The Philippine legal system is characterised as a civil law jurisdiction, and its sources of law are derived from the 1987 Philippine Constitution, statutes, administrative and local issuances, and case law.
The 1987 Philippine Constitution establishes a presidential system with three co-equal and independent branches: the legislative, the executive and the judicial.
The executive branch is headed by the President who is elected by direct popular vote. It is responsible for implementing and enforcing laws and managing the bureaucracy through various departments and agencies.
The legislative branch is divided into the Senate and the House of Representatives. They are authorised to make laws, alter and repeal them.
The judicial branch is composed of a Supreme Court and lower courts. It holds the power to settle controversies involving rights that are legally demandable and enforceable.
The 1987 Constitution also recognises local autonomy, allowing local government units (LGUs) to manage their own affairs within the framework of national unity. Each LGU has elected officials and its own jurisdiction, and is authorised to enact local ordinances, collect local taxes and promote local development. These LGUs enjoy local autonomy but remain under the supervision of the national government.
Overview of the Laws and Regulations Applicable to a Business Operating in the Philippines
In general, the Philippine Civil Code governs obligations and contracts, which includes the framework for sources of obligation and the elements of a valid contract.
The primary law governing corporations in the Philippines is Republic Act No 11232, otherwise known as the Revised Corporation Code (RCC), which became effective on 23 February 2019. The RCC defines a corporation as “an artificial being created by operation of law, having the right of succession and the powers, attributes and properties expressly authorised by law or incident to its existence”.
Under the RCC, corporations are classified as either stock corporations or non-stock corporations. Stock corporations must have capital stock divided into shares and must be authorised to distribute to its shareholders dividends out of its surplus profits.
Corporations created under the RCC are distinct from those created under special law, which are generally owned or controlled by the government, and are primarily governed by such special law, supplemented by the Revised Corporation Code as far as applicable.
In addition to the RCC, Republic Act No 7042 or the Foreign Investments Act of 1991 (FIA), as amended by Republic Act No 8179 and further amended by Republic Act No 11647, provides for the nationality restrictions on business activities and capital requirements for certain sectors when such activities and sectors include FDI.
The Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the national government regulatory agency charged with supervision over the corporate sector, the capital market participants, and the securities and investment instruments market, and the protection of the investing public. In this regard, the SEC enforces the provisions of the RCC.
As a general rule, foreign individuals, corporations or other entities are allowed to engage in business in the Philippines. However, the extent of equity held by foreigners in some business activities is restricted or limited under the 1987 Philippine Constitution and special laws. The FIA governs the participation of foreign entities in economic and commercial activities in the Philippines.
The Regular Foreign Investment Negative List promulgated from time to time enumerates the business activities that are subject to foreign equity restrictions and limitations.
The most recent Twelfth Negative List was issued on 27 June 2022. It contains two lists:
Some activities included in List A of the Twelfth Negative List are as follows.
The maximum amount of equity held by a foreigner in a corporation will, therefore, depend on the type of activity that the entity will engage in.
If the corporation is engaged in a partially nationalised business activity, foreigners may become members of the board of directors only in proportion to their allowable participation or share in the capital of such entities. Further, foreigners cannot intervene in the management, operation, administration or control of corporations that are engaged in nationalised or partially nationalised business activities, whether as officers, employees or labourers thereof. However, the Secretary of Justice may authorise their employment as foreign technical personnel.
Domestic market enterprises produce goods or provide services exclusively for the domestic market. If they export a portion of their products, they do not consistently export at least 60% of their output. Domestic market enterprises can be 100% foreign owned if the following conditions are met:
If a domestic market enterprise does not meet the minimum paid-in capital requirement, foreign ownership is limited to 40%. Foreign investments in export enterprises are permitted up to 100% equity participation, provided the enterprise does not engage in any activity listed on the Negative List.
In recent years, the Philippines has liberalised nationality restrictions, allowing up to 100% foreign equity in most domestic enterprises, except where restricted by the 1987 Constitution or the Foreign Investment Negative List.
Amendment to the FIA
Under Republic Act No 11647, which amended the FIA, the list of enterprises reserved to Philippine nationals was amended. Except as otherwise provided under Republic Act No 8762, otherwise known as the Retail Trade Liberalization Act of 2000 (RTLA), and other relevant laws, micro and small domestic market enterprises with paid-in equity capital less than the equivalent of USD200,000 are reserved to Philippine nationals. However, Republic Act No 11647 provides that in the following instances, a minimum paid-in capital of USD100,000 shall be allowed to non-Philippine nationals:
Registered foreign enterprises employing foreign nationals and enjoying fiscal incentives shall implement an understudy or skills development programme to ensure the transfer of technology or skills to Filipinos.
Amendment to the RTLA
Republic Act No 11595 amended the RTLA by lowering the required paid-up capital for foreign retail businesses. Previously, there was a high minimum paid-up capital requirement of USD2.5 million for foreign retailers and restrictive prequalification requirements. Under Republic Act No 11595, the minimum paid-up capital for foreign retailers was reduced from USD2.5 million to PHP25 million or approximately USD425,000. For foreign retailers engaged in retail trade through more than one physical store, the minimum investment per store must be at least PHP10 million.
Republic Act No 11595 also removed the pre-qualification requirement for the Board of Investments (BOI). However, foreign retailers are required to maintain the required minimum paid up capital.
Amendment to the Public Service Act
Republic Act No 11659 amended Commonwealth Act No 146 and permits 100% foreign ownership of public services in the Philippines that are not categorised as public utilities.
Under Section 4 of Republic Act No 11659, “public utility” refers to a public service that operates, manages or controls for public use any of the following:
Section 4 of Republic Act No 11659 further provides that no other person shall be deemed a public utility unless otherwise subsequently provided by law. Thus, the definition introduced by Republic Act No 11659 limits the coverage of public utility to specific sectors that will remain subject to the 40% foreign equity ownership limit provided for by the 1987 Constitution.
Considering this amendment, Republic Act No 11659 allows for 100% foreign ownership in public services that are not categorised as public utilities. This includes sectors such as telecommunications, transportation, tollways and airports.
Amendment to Tax Incentives
Republic Act No 12066, also known as the CREATE MORE Act, was passed to further enhance the Philippines’ investment climate by making the tax incentive system more competitive, predictable and investor-friendly while still safeguarding government revenues. The law responds to concerns from investors about the complexity and rigidity of the existing tax regulations.
Republic Act No 12066 allows for longer and more flexible incentive periods for business enterprises (RBEs) which are registered with Investment Promotion Agencies, especially those engaged in high-value, strategic or export-oriented activities. This provision helps investors achieve long-term planning stability and encourages large-scale and capital-intensive investments.
The law refines the 5% Special Corporate Income Tax on Gross Income Earned, making it more attractive and clearer in application. This tax option remains in lieu of all national and local taxes, reducing the overall tax burden and simplifying compliance for qualified RBEs.
Republic Act No 12066 expands and clarifies VAT zero-rating and VAT exemption provisions, particularly for export enterprises and domestic market enterprises with export activities. These measures aim to lower production costs and enhance competitiveness in global markets.
The law likewise promotes a more balanced incentive structure that benefits both domestic and foreign investors, encourages reinvestment, and supports technology transfer, job creation and regional development.
The CREATE MORE Act fosters investment by making tax incentives more competitive, predictable and responsive to investor needs. By refining corporate tax incentives and improving administrative clarity, the law aims to attract more investments, generate employment and support sustainable economic growth in the Philippines.
To engage in business activities in the Philippines, foreign investors may either establish: (i) a representative office/liaison office; (ii) regional or area headquarters; (iii) regional operating headquarters; (iv) branch office; or (v) domestic subsidiary.
Representative Office
A representative office acts merely as a liaison office between its head office and the latter’s Philippine-based clients or customers. Its permitted activities are restricted to tasks such as information sharing, product promotion, quality control and similar functions.
The representative office is prohibited from concluding sales agreements on behalf of its head office or generating income in the Philippines. All expenses incurred by the representative office are covered by its head office.
Regional or Area Headquarters (RHQ)
An RHQ is meant to act as an administrative branch in the Philippines of a multinational company engaged in international trade. It principally serves as a supervision, communications and co-ordination centre for its subsidiaries, branches or affiliates in the Asia-Pacific region and other foreign markets.
It is not allowed to earn or derive income in the Philippines. It is required to submit an undertaking that such amount as may be necessary to cover its operations in the Philippines, which must be at least USD50,000, will be remitted annually to the Philippines.
Regional Operating Headquarters (ROHQ)
An ROHQ is a branch established in the Philippines by a multinational company, which is engaged in certain qualifying services.
It is allowed to derive income in the Philippines. However, an ROHQ is prohibited from offering qualifying services to entities other than its affiliates, branches or subsidiaries, nor shall it be allowed to solicit or market goods and services directly and indirectly, whether on behalf of its mother company, branches, affiliates, subsidiaries or any other company.
An ROHQ must initially remit into the Philippines at least USD200,000.
Branch Office
If a foreign corporation intends to conduct the business operations of its parent company in the Philippines and generate income from the country, it may establish a branch office, which is treated as an extension of the parent foreign corporation and does not have a separate legal identity. Thus, any judgment or claim for liability against the branch office in the Philippines will be directed against the parent company. Furthermore, a branch is considered a foreign entity. For this reason, if the business activity is subject to foreign equity restrictions, the foreign investor may not be allowed to establish a branch office.
At least USD200,000 or its equivalent in other acceptable foreign currency must be remitted to the Philippines as initial funding for the branch office. The amount of required minimum capital may be reduced to USD100,000 if the branch office will engage in a business that involves advanced technology, as determined by the Philippine Department of Science and Technology, or directly employs at least 50 employees, as certified by the Department of Labor and Employment.
A branch office is required to deposit with the SEC acceptable securities (certain government debt instruments and equity instruments) with an actual market value of not less than PHP500,000, for the benefit of present and future domestic creditors of the foreign corporation within 60 days after the issuance of its licence to conduct business.
Domestic Corporation
Subject to legal requirements, foreign investors may establish and register a domestic corporation.
A foreign investor can establish a regular corporation or a local subsidiary in the Philippines through registration with the SEC. This entity has a juridical personality separate and distinct from that of its shareholders. A regular corporation or a local subsidiary of a foreign corporation is considered separate and distinct from its parent company.
Shareholders are only liable up to the extent of their investments as represented by the shares they have subscribed to. Corporate entities are permitted to act as incorporators of corporations, with a minimum of two incorporators required. Corporations have a perpetual term unless stated otherwise in their Articles of Incorporation. Furthermore, unless stipulated by law, corporations are not obligated to meet a minimum requirement for subscribed and paid-up capital. The minimum paid-up capital of a domestic corporation with foreign equity participation exceeding 40% of its outstanding and voting capital stock that will operate as a domestic market enterprise must be equivalent to at least USD200,000.
Merger control in the Philippines is governed by Republic Act No 10667 or the Philippine Competition Act (PCA). The PCA introduces the pre-notification regime for M&A, which requires covered transactions to be notified to the Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) for its approval.
Parties to a merger or acquisition that satisfy the thresholds set by the PCC are required to notify the PCC before the execution of the definitive agreements relating to the transaction. From 1 March 2025, if a party to an M&A transaction is greater than PHP8.5 billion in value and if the transaction size is greater than PHP3.5 billion, such M&A must be notified to the PCC before it can proceed.
In addition, the public offering of securities in the Philippines is governed by the SRC, which provides that no security can be sold or offered for sale or distribution within the Philippines without a registration statement duly filed with, and rendered effective by, the SEC.
Takeovers of public companies are also regulated by the SRC Rules on tender offers. Compliance with the disclosure rules and requirements is monitored and enforced by the SEC. A mandatory tender offer applies whatever the method by which control of a public company is obtained, either through the direct purchase of its stocks or through indirect means.
Every corporation, domestic or foreign, doing business in the Philippines, is required to comply with the following basic reporting requirements of the SEC. The following documents must be submitted.
Audited Financial Statements (AFS)
The AFS must be audited by an independent certified public accountant. If the total assets or total liabilities of the corporation are less than PHP600,000, the financial statements shall be certified under oath by the corporation’s treasurer or chief financial officer. The AFS must be stamped as “RECEIVED” by the Bureau of Internal Revenue which must be filed within 120 calendar days after the end of the fiscal year, as indicated in the financial statements.
The SEC may place the company under delinquent status in case of its failure to submit the reporting requirements three times, consecutively or intermittently, within a period of five years.
General Information Sheet (GIS)
The corporation is likewise required to submit a GIS to the SEC, to be filed annually and within 30 days from the date of the annual stockholders’ meeting. The SEC may place the company under delinquent status in case of its failure to submit the reportorial requirements three times, consecutively or intermittently, within a period of five years.
Stock and Transfer Book (STB)
A stock corporation, or a corporation which has capital stock divided into shares and is authorised to distribute to the holders of such shares, dividends, or allotments of the surplus profits on the basis of the shares held, is required to register its STB with the SEC within 30 days from its incorporation.
The STB shall contain a record of all stocks in the names of the stockholders alphabetically arranged, the instalments paid and unpaid on all stocks for which subscription has been made, and the date of payment of any instalment, a statement of every alienation, sale or transfer of stock made, the date thereof, by and to whom made, and such other entries as the by-laws of a corporation may prescribe.
Disclosure of Beneficial Owners
SEC Memorandum Circular No 15, series of 2025 requires reporting entities to keep and preserve in its principal office adequate, timely and accurate information relating to its beneficial owner or owners to be identified in the matter provided by the SEC.
The information on beneficial ownership is adequate when the reporting entity has the complete names, specific residential addresses, dates of birth, sex, nationalities, mobile number and/or landline, email addresses, tax identification numbers, if any, civil status, politically exposed persons, date the individual became a beneficial owner and percentage of ownership, if applicable, of all its beneficial owners.
The RCC provides for the following rights of minority shareholders in a domestic corporation.
Pre-Emptive Right
All stockholders of a stock corporation shall enjoy the pre-emptive right to subscribe to all issues or disposition of shares of any class, in proportion to their respective shareholdings, unless such right is denied by the articles of incorporation.
However, such right shall not extend to shares issued in compliance with laws requiring stock offerings or minimum stock ownership by the public; or to shares issued in good faith with the approval of the stockholders representing two-thirds of the outstanding capital stock in exchange for property needed for corporate purposes or in payment of previously contracted debt.
Cumulative Voting for Directors
In cumulative voting, a shareholder’s votes are multiplied by the number of directors to be elected and the shareholder can concentrate the total number of its votes on one candidate or group of candidates.
Right to Call Special Meetings
A stockholder may propose the holding of a special meeting and items to be included on the agenda. Whenever for any cause, there is no person authorised, or the person authorised unjustly refuses to call a meeting, the SEC, upon petition of a stockholder on a showing of good cause, may issue an order directing the petitioning stockholder to call a meeting by giving proper notice.
Further, SEC Memorandum Circular No 7, series of 2021, as applicable for publicly listed companies, allows any number of shareholders of a corporation who hold at least 10% or more of the outstanding capital stock to call a special stockholders’ meeting.
Inspection of Books and Records
Corporate records, regardless of the form in which they are stored, shall be open to inspection by any director, trustee, stockholder or member of the corporation in person or by a representative at reasonable hours on business days, and a demand in writing may be made by such director, trustee or stockholder at their expense, for copies of such records or excerpts from them.
A requesting party who is not a stockholder or member of record, or is a competitor, director, officer, controlling stockholder or otherwise represents the interests of a competitor shall have no right to inspect or demand reproduction of corporate records.
Appraisal Right
Any stockholder shall have the right to dissent and demand payment of the fair value of the shares in the following instances:
In addition, the RCC requires certain acts to be approved by at least two-thirds of the outstanding capital stock, namely:
Other than disclosure through the General Information Sheet and Beneficial Ownership Declaration (described in 4.1 Corporate Governance Framework), there are generally no disclosure requirements specially applicable to FDI. Foreign investors may register their investment with the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), but this is not mandatory. Such registration of foreign investments with the BSP is only required if the foreign exchange needed to service the repatriation of capital and/or remittance of dividends, profits and earnings which accrue thereon shall be sourced from the Philippine banking system.
Foreign exchange needed for capital repatriation and remittance of dividends, profits and earnings of unregistered foreign investment may be sourced outside of the banking system.
The primary regulator of securities, corporations and capital market participants is the SEC.
The Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE), a shareholder-based and revenue-earning corporation, is the only stock exchange in the Philippines. It is classified as a self-regulatory organisation (SRO), meaning that it can implement its own rules and establish penalties on erring trade participants (TPs) and publicly listed companies. In addition, the Capital Markets Integrity Corporation (CMIC), which is also licensed as an SRO, provides audit, surveillance and compliance oversight over TPs and listed companies.
As SROs, the PSE and CMIC can adopt their own rules with the prior approval of the SEC, enforce compliance by trading participants and listed companies with those rules, and impose penalties on erring TPs and listed companies. To a certain extent, PSE exercises disciplinary authority over other market participants determined by the PSE to be responsible for offer-related violations. However, the PSE and CMIC remain under the oversight of the SEC.
In a 2024 publication of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the equity market in the Philippines was described as lacking “the consistent dynamism of other Asian economies, with both the amounts of capital raised and the number of offerings failing to achieve steady growth”. Particularly, it was stated that “IPO activity has been substantially lower in the Philippines than in peer countries both in terms of the number of IPOs and capital raised. Regarding the non-financial sector, only 77 Philippine companies have entered the market since the early 2000s, collectively raising USD11 billion”. As of 2025, there are 287 listed companies on the PSE.
The 2024 publication of the OECD described the bond market as ranking second-to-last relative to its peer countries in terms of number of bonds issued, with 567 bonds since 2000. The Philippine Dealing & Exchange Corp (PDEx) is the only regulated fixed income marketplace in the Philippines where corporate bonds can be listed and traded. The PDEx operates an electronic trading platform and is designated by the SEC as an SRO.
The SRC provides for regulations on the issuance of securities in the Philippines and sets out the registration requirements for issuances of securities and the exemptions therefrom.
Under the SRC, securities offered or sold to the public are generally required to be registered with the SEC, unless the securities are exempt. This is done by filing a registration statement to be approved by the SEC. However, the SRC exempts certain transactions from registration, such as limited or private offerings, sales to qualified buyers, and other transactions that pose minimal public risk. The SEC may also exempt other transactions, if it finds that the requirement of registration under the SRC is not necessary in the public interest or for the protection of the investors, for example because of the small amount involved or the limited character of the public offering.
With regard to reporting requirements, issuers are required to file an annual report, quarterly report and current reports, as necessary, to make a full, fair and accurate disclosure to the public of every material fact or event that occurs, which would reasonably be expected to affect investors’ decisions in relation to those securities. Disclosure requirements are also required of beneficial ownership of 5% of any class of equity securities of a company satisfying the requirements of Section 17.2 of the SRC.
Further, the SRC provides the requirements relating to tender offers, including mandatory tender offers and those exempt therefrom.
FDI in the Philippines is subject to the nationality restrictions in the FIA and securities regulation under the SRC. Other than that, there is generally no requirement for an investment to be reviewed or approved by any Philippine regulatory authority.
Merger control in the Philippines is governed by the PCA, which was enacted to enhance economic efficiency, promote free and fair competition, prevent economic concentration which will unduly stifle competition, lessen, manipulate or constrict the discipline of free markets, and penalise all forms of anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position and anti-competitive mergers and acquisitions.
The PCA introduces the pre-notification regime for mergers and acquisitions, which requires covered transactions to be notified to the PCC for its approval, namely those transactions that exceed both the size of transaction (SOT) and size of party (SOP) thresholds, which are adjusted annually. Starting from 1 March 2025, mergers and acquisitions that exceed the parameters of size of party of PHP8.5 billion and size of transaction of PHP3.5 billion must be notified to the PCC before proceeding.
Upon submission of the prescribed Notification Form, the PCC has 15 days to check the completeness of the submitted documents. Once confirmed, the PCC will conduct its Phase I review within 30 days from the date of confirmation (“Phase I Review”). Should the PCC determine that a more comprehensive or detailed analysis of the merger or acquisition is necessary, it shall conduct its Phase II Review for an additional 60 days. However, the total review period shall not exceed 90 days. To facilitate time-sensitive transactions, the PCC allows for an Expedited Merger Review.
If a transaction falls below the SOP and SOT thresholds, the PCC may, motu propio, review transactions if it believes that the transaction is likely to substantially prevent, restrict or lessen competition in the relevant market.
Parties to a transaction that is subject to compulsory notification must notify the PCC within 30 calendar days after the signing of definitive agreements relating to the merger but prior to any acts of consummation.
If parties to a merger and their ultimate parent entity fail to notify the PCC or breach the waiting period before consummating the merger, the merger or acquisition is considered invalid and without legal effect. Further, the parties will be fined 1% to 5% of the transaction’s value.
The PCA also prohibits anti-competitive conduct, such as anti-competitive agreements, and abuse of dominant position. In general, anti-competitive agreements are agreements that substantially prevent, restrict or lessen competition. These may be between competitors (horizontal agreements) or between and among enterprises in a production or distribution chain (vertical agreements) that prevent, distort or restrict competition in a territory. Examples include price fixing, output limitation, market sharing and bid rigging. On the other hand, abuse of dominant position occurs when an entity with a significant degree of power in a market engages in conduct that substantially prevents, restricts or lessens competition. Examples include predatory pricing, price discrimination, limiting production, markets or technical development and exploitative behaviour towards consumers, customers or competitors.
Rule 4 of the IRR of the PCA provides that the PCC, motu proprio or upon notification, shall have the power to review mergers and acquisitions having a direct, substantial and reasonably foreseeable effect on trade, industry or commerce in the Philippines, based on factors deemed relevant by the PCC.
In conducting this review, the PCC shall assess whether a proposed merger or acquisition is likely to substantially prevent, restrict, or lessen competition in the relevant market or in the market for goods and services as may be determined by the PCC; and take into account any substantiated efficiencies put forward by the parties to the proposed merger or acquisition, which are likely to arise from the transaction.
In evaluating the competitive effects of a merger or acquisition, the PCC shall endeavour to compare the competitive conditions that would likely result from the merger or acquisition with the conditions that would likely have prevailed without it.
Further, the PCC evaluates the competitive effects of a merger or acquisition, and may consider, on a case-by-case basis, the broad range of possible factual contexts and the specific competitive effects that may arise in different transactions, such as:
Under the PCC’s Merger Remedies Guidelines, the parties may propose behavioural and structural remedies, and ancillary measures.
Behavioural remedies seek to address the identified substantial prevention, restriction or lessening of competition (SLC) by regulating the conduct of parties, post-transaction. This is achieved by imposing requirements or restrictions on certain conduct of the merged firm post-transaction so that it does not act in an anti-competitive manner or exercise its enhanced market power to foreclose rivals despite having the ability and incentive to do so. Behavioural remedies target and seek to minimise the adverse effects of the transaction by regulating post-merger outcomes. An example is access or non-discrimination obligations.
Proposed behavioural remedies must conform to the following: (i) their terms are readily and affordably monitored, (ii) there is a straightforward punishment mechanism with strong deterrence effect for breach, and (iii) there is more benefit to adopt a behavioural remedy than a structural remedy or a structural remedy is not feasible.
On the other hand, structural remedies affect the structure of the market, usually by creating, restoring or maintaining a firm that will compete independently. These are self-policing and do not require active monitoring; their effects on the market have a degree of permanence; and they directly address the source of competitive harm by eliminating its root cause. Divestiture is an example of a structural remedy.
Ancillary measures refer to additional steps or conditions that the parties must comply with before, during and/or after the implementation of the remedy to ensure the effectiveness of the proposed remedy.
The PCC has the power to conduct inquiries, investigate and hear and decide on cases involving any violation of the PCA. It may also exercise its powers of review to prohibit mergers and acquisitions that will substantially prevent, restrict or lessen competition in the relevant market. Further, the PCC has the power to issue adjustment or divestiture orders including orders for corporate reorganisation or divestment in the manner and under such terms and conditions as may be prescribed in the rules and regulations implementing the PCA.
In this regard, before the investment is made, and provided that the transaction is subject to mandatory notification, the PCC may block an investment by not approving it. After an investment is made and if it was required to be notified but there was failure to do so, the PCC may declare the merger/acquisition as void and without legal effect.
Final orders or decisions of the PCC are appealable to the Court of Appeals in accordance with the Rules of Court. The appeal shall be made within 15 calendar days from receipt of the PCC’s decision. The appeal shall not stay the final order or decision sought to be reviewed, unless the Court of Appeals directs otherwise.
Foreign investors who conduct business in the Philippines are required to register with the SEC or the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), as appropriate, and secure additional registrations, permits and licences from relevant government agencies based on their specific industry.
However, other than the nationality restrictions, there is no national security review for FDI.
This is not applicable in the Philippines. See 7.1 Applicable Regulator and Process Overview.
This is not applicable in the Philippines. See 7.1 Applicable Regulator and Process Overview.
This is not applicable in the Philippines. See 7.1 Applicable Regulator and Process Overview.
Ownership of private land in the Philippines is limited to Filipino citizens and corporations whose capital is at least 60% owned by Filipino citizens. However, Republic Act No 7652 or the Investors’ Lease Act, as amended by Republic Act No 12252, allows foreign investors to enter into long-term leases of private land, subject to certain requirements, namely:
The taxes imposed on a domestic corporation are:
By way of exception, corporations with net taxable income not exceeding PHP5 million and with total assets not exceeding PHP100 million, excluding land on which the corporation’s office, plant and equipment are situated during the taxable year, shall be taxed at 20% corporate income tax.
Please also refer to the discussion on tax incentives in 2.1 Current Economic, Political and Business Climate.
Passive income, such as dividends or interest, is subject to withholding tax. Dividends distributed by Philippine companies to non-resident foreign corporations (ie, non-resident aliens not engaged in trade or business) are generally subject to a 25% final withholding tax. A reduced 15% rate applies if the home country exempts the dividend from tax or permits a 15% or greater credit for corporate taxes paid by the company paying the dividend.
In addition to the FIA, the Omnibus Investment Code of 1987 governs foreign investments in the Philippines, while the granting of incentives is administered by investment promotions agencies, such as the BOI under the DTI, and the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA).
BOI registered enterprises shall be entitled to incentives, including:
On the other hand, PEZA-registered enterprises are entitled to incentives available to BOI-registered entities plus additional incentives of exemption from:
Capital gains from the sale or other disposition of shares not traded on the stock exchange, whether involving domestic or foreign corporations, are uniformly taxed at a 15% final rate on the net capital gain.
Sales of shares of stock listed and traded on a local or foreign stock exchange, other than the sale by a dealer in securities, are subject to a stock transaction tax of 0.1%. The scope of the stock transaction tax now includes the disposition of (i) other securities listed and traded through a local stock exchange and (ii) shares of stock of a domestic corporation listed and traded through a foreign stock exchange.
The Philippines does not have a general anti-avoidance rule.
The Labor Code of the Philippines (the “Labor Code”) provides for the minimum labour standards and benefits of employment that employers must provide or comply with and to which employees are entitled as a matter of right.
It also protects employees’ rights to self-organisation and collective bargaining. Managerial and confidential employees, however, may not form or become members of labour unions. A labour union must be registered with the Department of Labor and Employment to enjoy the rights granted by law to labour unions.
The Labor Code provides that employees have the right to conduct a strike in accordance with law. On the other hand, the employer has the right to lock out employees in accordance with the circumstances under the Code.
Further, employees may form and join workers’ associations and other mutual aid and benefit associations for legitimate purposes, other than collective bargaining.
The following are the minimum standards of benefits:
In addition, the employer is required to register itself and its employees with the Social Security System (SSS), Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) and the Home Development Mutual Fund (Pag-IBIG).
Employees are generally compensated through cash and statutory benefits (including discretionary bonuses, stock options, retirement benefits, etc) under the Labor Code. Other kinds of compensation, or amounts above the minimum standards under the Labor Code, may be as stipulated in the employment contract (including performance/discretionary bonuses, stock options, retirement benefits, etc).
Republic Act No 7641, amended Article 301 of the Labor Code, governs company retirement plans. Upon reaching the retirement age established in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) or applicable employee contract, an employee may be retired. Upon retirement, an employee is entitled to the retirement benefits established in the CBA or applicable employee contract, provided that the terms thereof are not less than those established in law.
In the absence of a retirement plan or agreement providing for retirement benefits of employees in the establishment, an employee, upon reaching the age of 60 years or more, but not beyond 65 years, which is declared the compulsory retirement age, who has served at least five years in the relevant establishment, may retire and shall be entitled to retirement pay equivalent to at least half a month’s salary for every year of service, a fraction of at least six months being considered as one whole year.
Regular employees are entitled to security of tenure, which means that they cannot be terminated except for just and authorised causes as provided in the Labor Code.
In the event of an acquisition by share sale or change of control, the employee’s tenure and compensation/benefits are not affected since the employment contract is with the target company and there is no change of employer. In any other transaction which results in an authorised cause (enumerated below), the employee may be terminated and is entitled to separation pay. Notably, there is no legal obligation for a buyer in an asset sale to absorb an employee without an assumption clause.
As regards authorised causes, separation pay is dependent on the specific authorised cause. In case of termination due to the installation of labour-saving devices or redundancy, the affected worker shall be entitled to separation pay equivalent to at least one month’s pay or to at least one month pay for every year of service, whichever is higher. In case of disease, retrenchment to prevent losses and in cases of closures or cessation of operations of establishment or undertaking not due to serious business losses or financial reverses, the separation pay shall be equivalent to one month pay or at least one-half month’s pay for every year of service, whichever is higher. A fraction of at least six months shall be considered one whole year.
If the dismissal is based on authorised causes, the employer must give the employee and the DOLE written notice 30 days prior to the effectiveness of the separation.
Intellectual property is not an important aspect of screening FDI in the Philippines.
Republic Act No 8293, otherwise known as the Intellectual Property Code (the “IP Code”), enumerates the following intellectual property rights that can be protected: (i) copyright and related rights; (ii) trade marks and service marks; (iii) geographic indications; (iv) industrial designs; (v) patents; (vi) layout designs (topographies) of integrated circuits; and (vii) protection of undisclosed information.
Rights and defences are granted to owners of the various intellectual property rights stated above. Section 122 of the IP Code provides that rights to a trade mark shall be acquired through registration. Once the word mark is registered, the owner may maintain the registration by submitting proofs of use of the mark in any colour, typeface, style and/or design. Thus, in order to avail of the remedies under the IP Code for the protection of its intellectual property in the form of its trade marks, registration is essential.
Republic Act No 10173, otherwise known as the Data Privacy Act (DPA), was enacted to ensure that personal data in information and communications systems in the government and in the private sector are secured and protected. It applies to the processing of all types of personal information and to any natural and juridical person involved in personal information processing including those personal information controllers and processors who, although not found or established in the Philippines, use equipment that is located in the Philippines, or those who maintain an office, branch or agency in the Philippines.
The DPA requires corporations to comply with the following to ensure the privacy of personal information and sensitive personal information:
The DPA provides that processing of personal information is allowed, unless prohibited by law. On the other hand, processing of sensitive personal information and privileged information is prohibited, except in cases enumerated under the DPA IRR.
In case of data breach, the National Privacy Commission (NPC) and affected data subjects must be notified by the personal information controller within 72 hours upon knowledge of the incident. Notification of personal data breaches shall be required when sensitive personal information or any other information that may be used to enable identity fraud are reasonably believed to have been acquired by an unauthorised person, and the personal information controller or the NPC believes that such unauthorised acquisition is likely to give rise to a real risk of serious harm to any affected data subject.
Any natural or juridical person, or other body involved in the processing of personal data, who fails to comply with the DPA, the DPA IRR and other issuances of the NPC, shall be liable for such violation, and shall be subject to its corresponding sanction, penalty or fine, without prejudice to any civil or criminal liability.
9th, 10th, 11th & 12th Floors, One Orion
11th Avenue, corner University Parkway
Bonifacio Global City
Taguig 1634 Metro Manila
Philippines
+63 288105858
info@cruzmarcelo.com www.cruzmarcelo.com
The Philippines enters 2026 with renewed policy momentum, establishing itself as one of Southeast Asia’s more actively restructured investment destinations. The country’s incentive regime is shifting to a performance-based model, guided by targeted sector priorities under the forthcoming 2026–2028 Strategic Investment Priority Plan (SIPP). Investment-driven tax reforms and recent legislation complement this approach, strengthening capital market efficiency and widening the role of the private sector in infrastructure development. These developments define the operating environment that investors and practitioners must now navigate as the Philippines advances its agenda for strategic, export-oriented, and technology-driven investment, supported by clearer governance standards and sustained fiscal discipline.
Investment Trends
Fiscal incentives for businesses in the Philippines are no longer handed out as guaranteed privileges. They are now measured and aligned with sectors the government considers most important for economic progress. The current framework places emphasis on incentives that are performance-based and aligned with national development goals, prioritising high-value, export-driven and technology-focused sectors.
At the core of this strategy is the SIPP, a three‑year investment roadmap that identifies priority economic activities and sectors that are eligible for fiscal and non‑fiscal incentives. This strategy encourages investment in areas that create more jobs, expand export capacity, modernise domestic industries, or support environmental and technological resilience. To do this, the plan groups qualified activities into three tiers, with higher tiers typically receiving longer and more significant incentive packages. The SIPP is reviewed and updated periodically to reflect national goals and global industry shifts.
The latest SIPP, which shall cover the period between 2026 and 2028, is due to be issued soon. Based on initial reports, Tier I Activities cover Basic Needs & Sustainability which focuses on activities that address modern basic needs and support sustainable growth, including: (i) agriculture, fisheries, and forestry, (ii) manufacturing, (iii) halal, kosher, and organic‑related production, (iv) services (including healthcare and disaster risk management), (v) infrastructure and logistics, (vi) energy and utility sectors, (vii) sustainability‑driven initiatives (eg, industrial waste treatment, bulk water supply) and (viii) export‑oriented activities and those covered by special laws.
Tier II covers goods or services not yet widely produced in the Philippines, including projects that reduce import reliance in areas tied to national defence, food security and gaps in important industrial supply chains.
Tier III is reserved for industries that push the boundaries of innovation, such as research and development, advanced manufacturing, digital technologies, and facilities that directly support start-ups and innovation ecosystems.
Tax Reforms
To attract more foreign investment, the Philippine government has rolled out tax reforms that aim to make doing business and investing in the country more accessible, equitable and cost-efficient.
Capital Market Efficiency Promotion Act
On 29 May 2025, the Philippine government enacted Republic Act No 12214, otherwise known as the Capital Market Efficiency Promotion Act (CMEPA), introducing comprehensive amendments to the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997. CMEPA aims to enhance the efficiency, simplicity and competitiveness of the Philippine capital markets through targeted tax reforms.
The law is rooted in the principle that strong capital markets are critical to economic growth. Accordingly, CMEPA advances several core policy objectives:
CMEPA clarifies definitions relevant to capital market transactions, such as “shares of stock”, “securities” and “passive income”, to ensure consistency in tax administration. One of the law’s most significant changes is the standardisation of tax on interest income and royalties. Where different tax rates once applied, interest income from Philippine bank deposits, trust funds, and similar financial instruments is now subject to a flat 20% final withholding tax.
The law also equalises how investment earnings are taxed: dividends now carry a 10% final tax, while profits made from selling shares that are not publicly traded are taxed at 15%, whether the corporation involved is domestic or foreign. This removes past inconsistencies in tax treatment and reinforces fairer conditions for both domestic and foreign investors.
To encourage more market activity and reduce the cost of investing, the stock transaction tax on the sale or exchange of listed domestic shares has been significantly reduced from 0.6% to 0.1% of the gross selling price. This lower rate now applies not only to local stock exchange transactions but also to those conducted through foreign stock exchanges, boosting regional competitiveness and investor appeal.
Further, CMEPA lowers the documentary stamp tax (DST) on original issuances of shares of stock and debt instruments from 1% to 0.75%, including bonds, debentures and similar instruments issued both locally and internationally. To further remove common tax hurdles, several transactions are now exempt from DST, including:
CMEPA marks a landmark tax reform in the Philippines, reducing investment and trading costs, strengthening investor protections and encouraging wider participation in the capital markets.
CREATE MORE Act
Republic Act No 12066, known as the CREATE MORE Act, was passed to further enhance the Philippines’ investment climate by making the tax incentive system more competitive, predictable and investor-friendly while maintaining safeguards for government revenues. The law responds to concerns from investors about the complexity and rigidity of the existing tax regulations, aiming to improve policy stability and business confidence.
The CREATE MORE Act enables business enterprises (RBEs) which are registered with Investment Promotion Agencies to access longer and more flexible incentive periods, especially those engaged in high-value, strategic or export-oriented activities. This change helps investors achieve long-term planning stability and encourages large-scale and capital-intensive investments.
The law also makes the 5% Special Corporate Income Tax (SCIT) on gross income earned clearer and more attractive in its application. For qualified registered businesses, SCIT continues to apply in place of all national and local taxes, reducing the overall tax load and simplifying compliance for qualified RBEs.
The CREATE MORE Act expands and clarifies VAT zero-rating and VAT exemption provisions, particularly for export enterprises and domestic market enterprises with export activities. These adjustments are designed to reduce production costs and strengthen competitiveness in global markets.
The law also advances a more balanced incentive structure that benefits both domestic and foreign investors, encourages reinvestment and supports technology transfer, job creation and regional development.
Taken together, the CREATE MORE Act signals a push for incentives that are more competitive, more predictable and more responsive to investor needs. By improving clarity around corporate incentives and administrative processes, the law seeks to attract investment, expand employment and support sustainable economic growth across the Philippines.
Ease of Paying Taxes Act
Republic Act No 11976, also known as the Ease of Paying Taxes (EOPT) Act, was enacted to modernise tax administration in the Philippines and make tax compliance simpler, fairer and more efficient. The law aims to reduce the burden on taxpayers by streamlining procedures, strengthening taxpayer rights, and improving the overall efficiency of the tax system.
One of the main provisions of the EOPT Act is the adoption of a “file-and-pay-anywhere” system, which allows taxpayers to file tax returns and pay taxes through any authorised bank, revenue district office or electronic platform, regardless of where they are registered. This removes geographic restrictions and reduces compliance costs and delays.
The law also classifies taxpayers as micro, small, medium and large, based on their size and capacity. This ensures that tax requirements, reporting obligations, and penalties are proportionate and reasonable, especially for micro and small businesses.
The EOPT Act encourages wider adoption of electronic filing, electronic payments and digital record-keeping, expanding the country’s digital tax services to improve processing efficiency, reduce filing errors and strengthen transparency within tax administration.
The EOPT Act removes or reduces certain penalties linked to honest mistakes, including penalties for paying taxes at the wrong venue. This reform promotes fairness and encourages voluntary compliance rather than punitive enforcement.
The law shortens the processing time for VAT refunds, setting clearer timelines for the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to act on refund claims. This provision improves cash flow for businesses, especially exporters and VAT-registered enterprises.
The EOPT Act reinforces taxpayer rights by requiring clearer communication from tax authorities, simplifying audit procedures and increasing transparency in tax assessments and collections, which are measures aimed at strengthening trust between taxpayers and the government.
By simplifying filing and payment rules, expanding digital tax access, improving refund timelines, reducing venue-based penalties and reinforcing taxpayer rights, the EOPT Act seeks to lower administrative costs, reduce preventable disputes and support a more transparent, efficient and business-friendly compliance environment that benefits both taxpayers and the government.
PPP Code
The Philippines faces an infrastructure demand of extraordinary scale. Although the country is rich in natural resources, it has struggled to convert this advantage into sustained economic growth, with infrastructure limitations widely cited as a core barrier. Inadequate transport, energy, digital and public service infrastructure have constrained both economic expansion and poverty reduction.
At the same time, the country’s widening budget deficit of PHP250 billion (around USD4.4 billion as of September 2023), makes public financing for large infrastructure upgrades even more challenging.
Against this backdrop, the private sector’s participation has shifted from being a strategic complement to becoming a practical necessity. The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model remains one of the government’s most important mechanisms for securing private financing, technical expertise and long-term operational capability for infrastructure development.
The Build-Operate-Transfer Law (the “BOT Law”), enacted in 1990, played a pivotal role in opening infrastructure development to private proponents. It authorised government infrastructure agencies, subject to meeting statutory requirements, to contract prequalified private partners for the financing, construction, operation and maintenance of financially viable public infrastructure projects.
However, despite its early successes, stakeholders have long pointed to structural weaknesses in the BOT Law, particularly ambiguities that left risk and responsibility allocation unclear; issues that could not be fully resolved by updating its implementing rules alone.
To address these gaps, Republic Act No 11966 or the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Code of the Philippines (the “PPP Code”) was signed into law on 5 December 2023 and became effective on 23 December 2023.
The PPP Code covers all contractual arrangements between an Implementing Agency (IA) and a private partner to finance, design, construct, operate and maintain development projects ordinarily provided by the public sector. The PPP Code expanded its coverage to include not only BOT projects, but all contractual arrangements which possess characteristics or elements of a PPP, including joint venture agreements which were previously outside the BOT Law’s scope.
It also introduced clearer approval pathways for PPP projects. National PPP projects costing PHP15 billion and above now require approval from the NEDA Board, based on a positive recommendation from its Investment Coordination Committee (NEDA Board-ICC). Meanwhile, national PPP projects below PHP15 billion are approved by the head of the IA.
On the other hand, the approval of local PPP projects shall be undertaken by the respective local legislative councils in the case of Local Government Units (LGUs), or by the boards in the case of local universities and colleges. Prior to their approval, local PPP projects being implemented by the LGUs should be confirmed by the respective local development councils.
One of the most consequential additions under the PPP Code is the 120-day decision rule, which requires approving bodies to act on a complete submission within 120 calendar days. If no decision is issued within this period, the project shall be “deemed approved”, allowing the IA to proceed with procurement.
To ensure the financial and economic viability of the PPP project, the PPP Code specifically provides that when the IA fails to implement the initial tolls, fees and other charges, and any agreed adjustments, the private sector shall be allowed to recover the difference. This is a major win for the private sector as there have been many instances where the IA, due to political or other reasons, are not able to or are hesitant to approve any toll or fee increases, which have thereby economically prejudiced the private sector partner.
PPP projects must now specify a Reasonable Rate of Return (RROR), expressed as an annualised percentage in the contract. If actual returns exceed the RROR, the excess is remitted to the National Treasury.
The unification of the formerly disintegrated PPP legal frameworks, organisation of the evaluation and approval process for PPP projects alike, and the introduction of predictable tariff regimes to protect public interest and protocols to fortify PPP institutions, are evident testament to the country’s unremitting resolve to develop a more sustainable PPP programme.
Registration Processes in Key Industries
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has continued its efforts to simplify registration processes for companies engaged in key industries with the following issuances:
This follows previous SEC issuances for agribusinesses under SEC MC No 8 s. 2023 and Hospitals under SEC MC No 11 s. 2017.
SEC RENT
Under SEC RENT, the SEC recognised the sustained rise in rental property developments in the Philippines, noting that these projects present meaningful growth opportunities for developers, investors, property owners and other stakeholders. Participation in rental property projects increasingly involves pooled investment arrangements, which may include the sale or public offer of investment contracts, certificates of participation, or profit-sharing agreements issued to unit owners acting as investors.
To provide regulatory clarity, SEC RENT sets the guidelines for registering these securities before they are offered to the public.
The coverage of SEC RENT includes the issuance of investment contracts, certificates of participation, profit-sharing agreements and other forms of securities issued by real estate developers and/or managers in relation to rental pool agreements.
The issuance defines the term “rental pool agreements” as investment contracts whereby the applicant sells or offers units in real estate projects such as condominiums, hotels, resorts or dormitories to prospective buyers on the condition that the buyers shall contribute the units, whether mandatory or optional, to a rental pool managed and operated by the applicant or a third-party operator. Under these arrangements, investors receive a share of rental income based on agreed commercial terms, typically drawn from the revenue generated by leasing the units to third parties.
Under SEC RENT, the registrant is required to obtain clearances from the SEC’s Company Registration and Monitoring Department (CRMD), Corporate Governance and Finance Department (CGFD), Enforcement and Investor Protection Department (EIPD), Office of the General Counsel (OGC) and Office of the General Accountant (OGA) before filing its registration statement with the Markets and Securities Regulation Department (MSRD).
After completing pre-filing activities, the registrant must submit the documentary requirements to the MSRD for pre-processing, namely the OGA Pre-Evaluation Clearance Form, SEC RENT Pre-evaluation Checklist Form, SEC RENT Form, Prospectus and all other required exhibits. Thereafter and upon payment of the filing fees, the MSRD will begin the 45-day review period.
SEC POWERS
Under SEC POWERS, the SEC provided guidelines for a simplified registration of securities for power generation companies (PowerGen) and distribution utilities (DU) companies, which are mandated under the Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001 (EPIRA) and Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) Resolution No 09, Series of 2011, as amended, to offer and sell to the public a portion of not less than 15% of their common shares of stocks.
Under SEC POWERS, the registrant is required, among other procedures, to obtain clearances from the relevant SEC departments, namely the CRMD, CGFD, EIPD, OGC and OGA before filing its registration statement with the MSRD.
For both SEC RENT and SEC POWERS, upon favourable consideration by the Commission En Banc of the registration statement, the MSRD shall issue a pre-effective letter. Upon compliance with the requirements, the MSRD shall issue an Order of Registration and/or Permit to Sell Securities to the Public. The sale of the securities via public offering shall commence within ten business days from the date of the effectivity of the registration statement and shall continue until the end of the offering period or until the sale is terminated by the issuer. If the sale is not commenced within ten business days, the registration statement shall be cancelled and all fees paid thereon forfeited.
Proposed Revisions to Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) Rules and Minimum Public Ownership (MPO)
In November 2025, the SEC released a draft MC proposing updates to the REIT rules to broaden the definition of income-generating assets and provide flexibility for the REIT sponsors in reinvesting proceeds.
Under the proposed amendments, the definition of “income-generating real estate” is expanded by allowing a REIT to directly or indirectly own income-generating real estate through a shareholding in an unlisted special purpose vehicle wholly owned by the REIT and duly constituted to primarily hold or own real estate. The draft also includes within the definition of “regular stream of income” those with recurring and predictable cash inflows derived from the lease of, or other similar arrangements involving such properties. These may include rental properties from toll roads, railways, airports and air navigation facilities, ports, information and communications technology infrastructure, energy infrastructure assets, data centres, parking lots, buildings, malls, warehouses or storage facilities, immovable fixtures, machineries, facilities and structures, and real rights over properties. Thus, more companies may be classified as REITs under the amended rules.
With regard to reinvestment by the REIT sponsor, the draft proposes extending the reinvestment period for proceeds from REIT share or asset sales from one to two years. The reinvestment in the Philippines may take the form of investment in equity, the extension of loans or purchase of debt instruments or the repayment of loans or debt instruments in relation to any Real Estate or Infrastructure Project in the Philippines.
In December 2025, the SEC published a draft MC providing a tiered approach to MPO requirements, calibrated to issuer size and intended to balance multiple policy considerations, including market liquidity, investor protection, capital formation and overall market competitiveness.
Under the proposal, companies seeking to conduct an initial public offering will be grouped into five tiers based on their expected market value at the time of listing.
Companies must also meet post-listing MPO thresholds. Firms under Tiers I to III must maintain 20% public ownership, while Tier IV must keep 15% and Tier V 12%. Companies already listed prior to the new circular becoming effective will remain subject to the current 20% requirement.
Summary
The Philippines is actively reforming its investment landscape through tax reductions, performance-based incentives, digitalisation of compliance and sector-specific support. The trends show a focus on digital transformation, export orientation, streamlining of registration processes, capital market promotion, green investments and regional development, all aimed at attracting sustainable and high-impact investments while balancing fiscal responsibility and governance concerns.
9th, 10th, 11th & 12th Floors, One Orion
11th Avenue, corner University Parkway
Bonifacio Global City
Taguig 1634 Metro Manila
Philippines
+63 288105858
info@cruzmarcelo.com www.cruzmarcelo.com