Life Sciences 2024

Last Updated March 18, 2024

South Korea

Law and Practice

Authors



Lee & Ko has become one of Korea’s premier full-service law firms, widely recognised for its leadership and outstanding success in every area of legal practice. As has been confirmed in numerous reviews conducted by Korea’s major media outlets, as well as ratings produced by international law firm rating services, Lee & Ko enjoys one of the highest levels of client satisfaction and a particularly excellent reputation for the quality of the firm’s legal services. Lee & Ko’s healthcare practice group of more than 70 professionals focuses on providing legal services expertly tailored to meet the needs of clients with specific concerns around healthcare and related matters, including pharma, bio, medical devices, food and beverage products, medical data with AI application, genome analysis, DTC, tobacco and cosmetics.

The primary legislation governing pharmaceuticals in Korea is the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act (PAA). The Act on the Safety of and Support for Advanced Regenerative Medicine and Advanced Biological Products (AABP) regulates cutting-edge biopharmaceutical products such as cell therapy, gene therapy, and tissue engineered products. The Medical Devices Act and the In-Vitro Medical Devices Act (collectively, MDA) regulate medical devices. All Acts, together with related presidential decrees, regulations and guidelines, are promulgated by the Office of the Prime Minister and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS).

On a related note, the Digital Medical Product Act was newly enacted on 23 January 2024. It aims to define and regulate digital medical products, including digital medical devices, digital integrated drugs, and digital medical/healthcare support devices. Such products were previously governed by the existing PAA, Medical Device Act, In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Act, their subordinate regulations, and MFDS guidelines. The Digital Medical Product Act will now have precedence over those regulations. It will first be effective for digital medical devices and digital integrated drugs on 24 January 2025, and sequentially for digital medical/healthcare support devices on 24 January 2026.

The Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW) and the MFDS (which is overseen by the MHW) are the main regulatory bodies in relation to pharmaceuticals and medical devices, and they are responsible for issuing and enforcing most of the regulations, guidelines and administrative orders for pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Local governments (such as the Seoul Metropolitan government) also monitor pharmaceutical and medical device entities within their jurisdiction.

Administrative orders issued by the MFDS, MHW or local governments to entities in violation of the PAA, AABP or MDA may be challenged via an administrative appeal to the competent administrative appeals commission under the Administrative Appeals Act, or via administrative litigation to the competent court under the Administrative Litigation Act. In most cases, either action will request that the competent commission or court revoke or declare null the administrative order. Rulings rendered by an administrative appeals commission may also be appealed to the competent court.

In general, these challenge procedures are applicable to other regulated products, such as food products.

Pharmaceuticals are categorised into over-the-counter (OTC) drugs and prescription drugs. In principle, all pharmaceuticals must be delivered to patients by licensed pharmacists at pharmacies, except in some cases such as administration of pharmaceuticals to patients by doctors within medical institutions. While prescription drugs require a prescription from physicians, OTC drugs can be supplied to consumers without a prescription. Additionally, the MHW has designated certain OTC drugs as emergency drugs to treat light symptoms in urgent situations at patients’ discretion, and such OTC drugs may be sold at 24-hour convenience stores by non-pharmacists after such stores’ registration with the local government.

Medical devices are classified into Classes I to IV, based on their intended use and the risk level associated with the device. Class I devices present the lowest risk, while Class IV devices are considered the highest risk and are subject to the greatest scrutiny.

The prospective Digital Medical Product Act, to be implemented for digital medical devices and digital integrated drugs on 24 January 2025, and for digital medical/healthcare support devices on 24 January 2026, allows the Minister of Food and Drug Safety to classify digital medical products into different tiers depending on their purpose, function, and potential risk, among other factors.

The PAA, the MDA, the Bioethics and Safety Act (BSA) and relevant regulations govern clinical trials of medicinal products and medical devices, and the MFDS oversees approval for clinical trials.

To conduct a clinical trial, the relevant clinical trial protocol must be reviewed and approved by an institutional review board (IRB) of the MFDS. The materials required to be submitted by the applicant for clinical trial approval include the following:

  • for medicinal products, the clinical trial protocol, development plan, investigator’s brochure, material on manufacturing and quality of the investigational drug, preclinical trial data, materials on medical institution conducting the clinical trial, institute analysing the clinical trial sample, and the investigator and Contract Research Organisation (CRO), policies and forms regarding the clinical trial subjects, etc; and
  • for medical devices, the clinical trial protocol, materials proving that the clinical trial medical device is being manufactured in accordance with the facility, manufacturing and quality management system standards, purpose of use, working principle and technical documents to verify performance and safety.

Once approved, clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with the protocol and standards regarding good clinical practice for medicinal products and medical devices, as applicable.

All clinical trials are registered with the MFDS. Basic information regarding clinical trials such as sponsor information, information on the clinical trial including its title, purpose and use, information of drug used, plan for clinical trial, method to arrange the participants subject to experimental group or control group, the status of the clinical trial (eg, on-going, completed), method to administer and evaluate the clinical test (eg, primary and secondary end point), and subject inclusion and exclusion criteria can be searched at the medicinal products comprehensive information system, which is a website of the MFDS.

No restriction exists on using online tools to support clinical trials. However, it is generally required that clinical trials are to be conducted by doctors or hospitals with in-person interviews, and written informed consents from clinical trial subjects. Recruitment of clinical trial subjects can be conducted online.

When a crisis alert level of serious magnitude or higher is declared, and if deemed necessary to protect patients, medical personnel, and medical institutions from the risk of infection, the protocols allowing provisional “untact” medical care (a term coined by a research team in Korea for non-face-to-face contact) under Article 49–3 of the Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act may be implemented. This may apply to clinical trials, where the treatment for and monitoring of patients during clinical tests may be converted to untact treatment and monitoring.

The data from clinical trials is considered as personal and sensitive data and the institutions conducting clinical trials are subject to the Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) for the collection, use, provision, etc, of such personal and sensitive information. In addition, information with respect to the participant’s identity or sponsor’s intellectual property, etc, shall not be disclosed to third parties unless there is explicit permission granted to access that information. Further, in order to protect the clinical trial subjects’ identity, unique identity numbers need to be assigned to subjects instead of their name.

When obtaining consent on the clinical trial from its subjects, the medical institution conducting the clinical trial must explain that the records of subjects’ personal information will be kept confidential, stipulate the same in writing, and make it clear that such personal information shall be maintained confidential even if results of the clinical trial become publicly available. It further needs to inform that the records relating to clinical trial including the subjects’ medical record can be accessed by the sponsor’s monitoring agent or inspector through an institutional review board (IRB) of the medical institution, and that the MFDS may also access and review such information and relevant materials.

In addition to the requirements described in 2.5 Use of Data Resulting From Clinical Trials, according to clinical trial management standards, such database needs to have a security system which prevents unauthorised persons from accessing the information, and matters as prescribed by the chief of MFDS for proper management of electronic records must be complied with. The sponsor also has to use identifier code for clinical trial subjects. 

Under Article 2 of the PAA, “drugs” are defined as those other than quasi-drugs, among the articles listed in the Korean Pharmacopoeia, or articles, other than appliances, machinery or equipment, used for the purposes of diagnosis, treatment, alleviation, care or prevention of diseases of human beings or animals, or used for the purpose of exerting pharmacological effects upon the structure or functions of humans or animals.

A “medical device” is defined under the MDA as an instrument, machine, apparatus, material, software or any other similar product specified in the following:

  • a product used for the purpose of diagnosing, curing, alleviating, treating or preventing a disease;
  • a product used for the purpose of diagnosing, curing, alleviating or correcting an injury or impairment;
  • a product used for the purpose of testing, replacing or transforming a structure or function; and/or
  • a product used for the control of conception.

With regard to medical devices, sometimes it is difficult to distinguish medical devices from personal healthcare products (which do not require medical device approval) even when considering the purpose of use and the risk to the human body. In such case, guidance or administrative interpretation from the MFDS may be requested.

To market biological drugs in Korea, the initial marketer is required to obtain marketing approval the same as that for chemical drugs. Key factors to consider when reviewing an application for market approval are:

  • data on origin or discovery and development process;
  • data on structure and physicochemical properties;
  • data on stability;
  • toxicological data;
  • data on pharmacological mechanism;
  • data on clinical trial results; and
  • data on domestic and overseas usage and approval status.

For some biologics such as the botulinum toxin, additional strict requirements on use, transfer, etc, apply. Meanwhile, unlike generic drugs, a bioequivalence test does not replace data on stability and efficacy in order to obtain market approval for biosimilars.

On the other hand, cell therapy products (medicine manufactured by physical, chemical, or biological manipulation, such as cultivation, proliferation, or screening of living cells of humans or animals in vitro), gene therapy products (medicine containing genetic material or drug-containing cells into which genetic material has been modified or introduced), tissue-engineered products (medicine manufactured by applying engineering technology to living cells or tissues of humans or animals for the purpose of regenerating, restoring or replacing tissues), advanced bio-convergence products (cell therapy products, gene therapy products, tissue engineered products, and medicinal products formed through physical and chemical combination (including fusion, complex, combination) with medical devices under the MDA) are regulated by AABP, and marketing authorisation must be obtained accordingly. (For those not regulated by AABP, PAA applies.)

Under the PAA, marketing authorisation for pharmaceuticals is valid for five years, and renewal is required after five years. For renewal, safety data, domestic manufacturing/import data, and a GMP compliance certificate must be submitted to the MFDS at least six months before the expiration date. If the marketing authorisation holder does not file the application for renewal or fails to meet the requirements, the marketing authorisation is cancelled.

In the case of medical devices, no renewal system existed previously, but since 8 October 2020, marketing authorisation for medical devices is to be valid for five years from the marketing authorisation date. Similar to pharmaceuticals, for medical devices, data proving that safety and efficacy has continued to be the same since the initial issuance of the marketing authorisation, and data on production/import performance, etc, must be submitted for renewal at least 180 days before the expiration date.

Data proving safety and efficacy, such as clinical trial results, must be submitted to the MFDS for obtaining marketing authorisation. In some cases, such as generic drugs or incrementally modified drugs, however, safety and efficacy data can be replaced with bioequivalence test result data.

The procedure for assessing marketing authorisation on medical devices varies depending on the risk they pose to human bodies. In the case of high-risk medical devices (Class III/IV), a higher level of scrutiny will apply, such as requesting and reviewing more data, including clinical data proving the efficacy and safety, compared to low-risk medical devices (Class I/II) where various data such as clinical trial data is exempted.

In the event that the indications for drugs or medical devices are changed after marketing authorisation, it is possible to file an approval for change, and the procedure is similar to the procedure for new marketing authorisations.

It is also possible to transfer a market approval from one market approval holder to another.

In Korea, even if no marketing authorisation has been obtained, investigational drugs can, after relevant clinical trials are implemented and approved, be used as part of a compassionate use programme. The compassionate use programme is permitted only in the following cases:

  • when treating patients with life-threatening conditions such as an end-stage cancer or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS);
  • when treating emergency patients, such as those in a critical condition or for whom there are no alternative treatment options; and
  • when attempting to use investigational drugs for research or analysis (referring to research or analysis not involving human subjects).

In addition, certain orphan drugs and drugs for the treatment of rare diseases that are directly imported and distributed by the Korea Orphan & Essential Drug Center (KOEDC), as well as drugs that the MFDS admits for urgent introduction for the treatment of patients, are exempted from the requirement for obtaining marketing authorisation.

Pharmaceuticals and medical devices are subject to PMS during the following re-examination periods, starting from the date of issuance of the market approval:

  • new drugs – six years;
  • pre-approved prescription drugs with a new indication – four years; and
  • new medical devices – four to seven years.

Of note, the National Assembly passed an amendment to PAA on 1 February 2023, which will repeal the drug re-examination system and introduce a comprehensive risk management system which integrates the safety management policy after the drug’s commercial release. The amendment has not been officially announced yet, but MFDS stated that it will be officially announced sometime in February 2024. Once announced, it will go into effect in one year from the announcement.

Approved pharmaceuticals or medical devices may be subject to re-evaluation if the MFDS finds it necessary to re-evaluate the safety and efficacy of the product. To re-evaluate, the MFDS reviews not only documents and materials submitted before the marketing authorisation, but other post-approval information, including side-effect data since launch, status in other countries and amendments to the marketing authorisation made in relation to safety and efficacy.

Under the PAA and MDA, if the applicant files a request in writing to protect information or data contained in the application for marketing authorisation against disclosure, such information or data should not be disclosed unless otherwise required by the public interest. The PAA and MDA even impose criminal penalties for breaching the non-disclosure obligation above.

Further, the Korean Criminal Act (KCA) punishes a public official or former public official who divulges secrets obtained in the course of performing their official duties.

While the contents of the application are not disclosed, third parties may infer from the following circumstances that certain marketing authorisations may be granted shortly:

  • clinical trial approval status for drugs is published on the MFDS website; in particular, it can be inferred that generic drugs are scheduled to be released from the clinical trial approval status, since the submission of bioequivalence test results is required for approval of generic drugs; and
  • the MFDS notices the DMF registration of APIs on its website.

A person who sells medicinal products or medical devices without marketing authorisation shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than five years or by a fine not exceeding KRW50 million. Also, the MFDS may suspend the manufacturing business for six months as an administrative sanction (licence may be revoked for repeat offenders).

It should be noted that, unlike criminal punishment, an administrative sanction can be imposed regardless of the violator’s intent.

The PAA and MDA have no regulation on the importation or exportation of counterfeit pharmaceuticals and medical devices.

However, the Korea Customs Service (KCS) should notify the owner of IP rights when discovering suspected counterfeits of the medical devices or pharmaceuticals which are protected by valid IP rights. Upon notification, the right-holder can request the KCS not to provide customs clearance to such counterfeits.

A manufacturing plant of pharmaceutical products is subject to an authorisation for manufacturing pharmaceuticals under the PAA, and a manufacturing plant of medical devices needs an authorisation for manufacturing medical devices under the MDA. The MFDS grants such authorisation. When a person, who intends to manufacture pharmaceuticals or medical devices, prepares and files the application for manufacturing authorisation and necessary documents with the local district of MFDS to which the manufacturer belongs, such local district MFDS reviews whether the applicant for manufacturing approval (in the case of a company, the representative) is qualified, whether all necessary documents are satisfied, and assesses whether the applicant has necessary facilities and labour force, and if appropriate, it grants authorisation. Once authorisation is granted, it will be valid without any other special renewal procedure unless grounds for revocation occur under the PAA or the MDA.

Of note, separate from MFDS’s authority under PAA/MDA with regard to requirements for facilities and labour force, other license/authorisations will be required for plant construction (such as those related to environment and safety).

Wholesale of pharmaceuticals is subject to authorisation from the head of Si/Gun/Gu (ie, the local government) in Korea. To obtain such authorisation, the applicant should meet qualifications and have a business place, warehouse and other facilities as prescribed by Presidential Decree of the PAA. The authorised wholesaler is in principle required to employ a pharmacist to manage the relevant tasks. Such authorised wholesaler can sell or acquire pharmaceuticals for sales purposes which comply with the standards for quality management of pharmaceuticals in distribution. There is no validity period for the authorisation of wholesale of pharmaceuticals. 

For the wholesale of medical devices, the wholesaler should file a notification of distribution with the competent Special Self-Governing Mayor, Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu. Once such notification of distribution is accepted, the person can distribute medical devices and there is no period of validity for wholesale notification.

Pharmaceuticals are classified into OTC drugs and prescription drugs under the PAA.

OTC drugs refer to any of the following drugs, which meet the standards determined and publicly notified by the Minister of Food and Drug Safety, following consultations with the Minister of Health and Welfare:

  • a drug, the misuse or abuse of which is of little concern, and whose safety and efficacy can be expected even when used without a prescription by a physician;
  • a drug that may be used to treat a disease without a physician’s or dentist’s professional knowledge; and/or
  • a drug which has a relatively small side effect on human bodies in light of their dosage form and pharmacological action.

Emergency drugs among the OTC drugs are used mainly for minor symptoms at the sole discretion of patients, and are publicly notified and prescribed by the Minister of Health and Welfare. Such emergency drugs can be purchased at places other than pharmacies. Conversely, prescription drugs mean drugs which are not OTC drugs and require a physician’s prescription. 

Meanwhile, orphan drugs mean either drugs used for the purposes of diagnosis or treatment of rare diseases under the Rare Disease Management Act or drugs with rare subject of application, whose alternative drug does not exist or whose safety or efficacy has been significantly improved compared to its alternative drug, which are designated by the Minister of Food and Drug Safety.

Other than the above, drugs essential for health and medical treatment, whose stable supply is difficult based only on market function, are designated and managed as national essential drugs.

The PAA and MDA are the primary laws governing the import and export of pharmaceuticals and medical devices, while the Customs Act and Integrated Public Announcement promulgated by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) pursuant to the Foreign Trade Act, apply the requirements of the PAA and MDA to the actual customs process.

In principle, pharmaceuticals and medical devices manufactured abroad are subject to the same regulations as those manufactured domestically. The importers of such products are responsible for obtaining the necessary licences from the MFDS, such as import business licences and marketing authorisation for particular products, and complying with all obligations under the PAA or MDA, such as quality testing. In addition to the above, importers also need to register overseas manufacturing facilities and undergo inspections of those facilities.

A manufacturing business licence and manufacturing authorisations for particular products are required for the manufacture of pharmaceuticals or medical devices, whether for domestic use or export. However, manufacturing authorisations for pharmaceuticals or medical devices that are only exported, and not sold or distributed domestically, are exempted from certain requirements and do not require renewal.

The MFDS regulates licences and authorisations for both pharmaceuticals and medical devices, while the Korean Customs Service enforces the relevant regulations at the point of entry for imports.

Only those with an import business licence from the MFDS for pharmaceuticals or medical devices can act as their importer of record.

In order to receive an import business licence for either pharmaceuticals or medical devices, the entity applying for the licence must fulfil certain requirements, such as having the required storage facilities, quality testing facilities and equipment, and personnel such as import managers and safety managers. Additionally, local presence is required in order to hold an import business licence for pharmaceuticals and medical devices.

In principle, only entities with an import business licence and marketing authorisation for the particular imported product can import pharmaceuticals or medical devices into Korea.

Exceptions of varying degrees to this rule include imports for the treatment of rare diseases, emergency use, clinical trials, research and testing, and personal use.

The Customs Act requires those who import products required by law to have approval, licence, labelling or fulfil other requirements for their importation to show proof of the fulfilment of such conditions to the head of the competent customs office, which for pharmaceuticals and medical devices are the requirements imposed by either the PAA (for pharmaceuticals) or the MDA (for medical devices), see 6.1 Governing Law for the Importation and Exportation of Pharmaceutical Devices and Relevant Enforcement Bodies to 6.3 Prior Authorisations for the Importation of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices.

Whether the imported product is subject to the regulations and requirements of either the PAA or MDA would be determined by whether the product satisfies the criteria for pharmaceuticals or medical devices as defined in the respective acts.

As of February 2024, Korea has entered into 22 economic partnership agreements and free trade agreements with other countries, all 22 of which (the RCEP and FTAs with Chile, Singapore, EFTA, ASEAN, India, the European Union, Peru, the United States, Türkiye, Australia, Canada, China, New Zealand, Vietnam, Colombia, MERCOSUR, the United Kingdom, RCEP, Israel, Cambodia and Indonesia) are in force.

The government’s price control for pharmaceuticals is based on the relevant laws such as the National Health Insurance Act (NHIA), the Rules on the Standards of National Health Insurance Medical Benefits, and the Standards for Decision or Adjustment on Drugs. Also, the government’s price control for medical devices is in accordance with NHIA, the Rules on the Standards of National Health Insurance Medical Benefits, and the Standards for Decision or Adjustment on Activity and Medical Materials for Treatment, etc. The MOHW, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) and national healthcare insurance system (NHIS) control the price of pharmaceuticals and medical devices.

Prices for the majority of medical services provided and pharmaceuticals sold in Korea are reimbursed by the Korean NHIS, and most legal residents of Korea are insured by NHIS. If a medical service or a pharmaceutical product is covered by NHIS, a patient cannot be charged more than the co-payment amount corresponding to the maximum reimbursement price published by the MOHW. If a medical service or pharmaceutical is not covered by NHIS, the healthcare provider is free to determine the price of such product or service.

For pharmaceuticals and medical services to be reimbursed, the HIRA and the MOHW determine whether to reimburse the costs for medical services or pharmaceuticals after evaluating clinical efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and other factors.

Regarding medical devices covered by the NHIS, the device may be subject to its own maximum reimbursement price, or the cost of the medical device may be included in the maximum reimbursement price for the relevant medical service that utilises such a device.

For drugs, foreign prices may be referenced in the negotiation of the drug’s maximum reimbursement price. In general, the economic evaluation for pharmaceuticals takes precedence over such external price referencing in determining the price of drugs. Foreign prices have direct effect only when deciding the price of drugs whose economic evaluation can be exempted under relevant pricing regulations.

Meanwhile, in the case of pricing of medical devices, foreign prices are not referenced but the import price or the price of listed products with similar function are considered.

A substantial part of the costs of pharmaceuticals and medical services (using medical devices) is covered by the national health insurance scheme. However, even when covered by the national health insurance scheme, the full amount is not paid by the health insurance, as the patient is responsible for the applicable co-pay amount.

There is a difference in the way pharmaceuticals and medical services are covered by health insurance. In the case of pharmaceuticals, products not listed on the reimbursement list are not covered by health insurance (positive-listing system), however, in the case of medical services, the MOHW stipulates medical services not covered by health insurance (negative-listing system).

Where drugs are concerned, it is the principle of the positive listing system to determine the eligibility for reimbursement and reimbursement amount on the basis of HTA (health technology assessment – ie, cost-utility analysis). In the case of pharmaceuticals for treatment of cancer or orphan diseases, however, economic evaluation may be omitted if certain criteria are met.

Meanwhile, for medical devices, the cost-effective analysis would play a minor role only to a limited extent in determining the eligibility for reimbursement and reimbursement amount.

After the separation of prescribing and dispensing in 2000, only physicians can prescribe drugs in hospitals, and only pharmacists can dispense drugs in pharmacies (this applies to the case of outpatient only, and dispensing drugs in pharmacies within the hospital is possible for inpatients). In order to prevent the over-prescription of narcotic or psychotropic drugs such as propofol, monitoring of prescription details is performed through HIRA’s big data management system.

There are currently no specific rules which regulate medical apps. However, a medical app may be treated as a medical device if the medical app satisfies requirements for medical devices as prescribed by the MDA. That is, in a case that a medical app is used for the purpose of diagnosing, curing, alleviating, treating or preventing a disease, it may be treated as a medical device under Article 2 of the MDA. If it is not used for the purpose above, however, it would not fall under the definition of a medical device.

Please note that medical apps could be subject to the prospective Digital Medical Product Act (to be implemented for digital medical devices and digital integrated drugs on 24 January 2025, and for digital medical/healthcare support devices on 24 January 2026). If medical apps meet the requirements for medical devices, they will be deemed digital medical devices; if they do not meet the requirements for medical devices but still aim to support healthcare and maintain/improve health, they will be considered as digital medical/healthcare support devices. Both cases are subject to the prospective Digital Medical Product Act.

In principle, the Medical Service Act (MSA) does not allow telemedicine between physician and patient. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Korean government temporarily allowed limited telemedicine until 1 June 2023. Since then, telemedicine is being tested through pilot programmes within a limited scope. 

According to the non-face-to-face medical treatment pilot project guidelines revised in December 2023, for clinic-level medical institutions, the target patients are principally limited to those who have received face-to-face treatment within the past six months at the same medical institution. However, exceptions apply to certain geographical areas, patient classes, and time periods where access to medical institutions is difficult. Under these exceptions, non-face-to-face treatment is possible even without prior history of face-to-face treatment.

On the other hand, at hospital-level medical institutions, non-face-to-face treatment is available only to patients with rare diseases who have received face-to-face treatment within the past year at the same medical institution, as well as patients who require continuous management after surgery or treatment and have received face-to-face treatment within the past 30 days at the same medical institution.

The Fair Labelling and Advertising Act (FLAA) applies to advertising of all products including pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Also, product advertising on an online portal, company webpage, social network, etc, will be subject to “Evaluation Protocols on Online Advertising”, the regulation of the Korean Fair Trade Commission (KFTC).

The advertising and promotion of pharmaceuticals are also regulated by the PAA and supervised by the MFDS. Further, advertising and promotion of medical devices are regulated by the MDA, and online advertising of medical devices via online portal, company webpage, social network, etc, are required to receive an in-advance review of voluntary review institution under the MDA.

Electronic prescriptions with digital signatures prescribed by physicians or dentists are regulated under Article 17-2 of the MSA. However, as there is no officially authorised system which transfers electronic prescription data from a medical institution to a pharmacy, filling prescriptions via electronic prescription is not currently implemented. At the moment, MOHW is reviewing the introduction of an official electronic prescription transfer system.

Online sales of medicines are not permitted under the PAA. Conversely, medical devices can be sold by a person who notified such distribution to the mayor or governor of the local government in the area where their business place is located. However, as for some products designated under Article 38 of Enforcement Rules of the MSA such as a thermometer, electronic automatic tonometer, etc, online sales are possible without notification of distribution of medical devices. 

Electronic health records contain extensive information on a patient’s health. The PIPA considers such information sensitive data and therefore imposes strict regulation by preventing any use without consent from patients in principle. Having stated that, the PIPA stipulates that in the case of pseudonymisation of sensitive data, such data may be processed without the consent of data subjects for statistical, scientific research purposes, etc. However, discussions are ongoing on whether using pseudonymised electronic records without patients’ consent would violate the MSA.

Meanwhile, if medical institutions satisfy the standards as set forth in “Guidelines for Facilities and Equipment Necessary for Managing and Keeping Electronic Medical Records”, as published by MHW, they can store and keep such electronic medical records (EMR) in an outside system. Accordingly, in the event that medical institutions meet technical standards as prescribed by the above Guidelines (eg, network and system security equipment and backup storage device), they can transmit EMR of patients to a cloud platform for storage.

The PAA and the Patent Act (PA) are the main laws governing patents on pharmaceuticals and medical devices in Korea. Every patent is subject to the PA. The main legal issues regarding patents on pharmaceuticals and medical devices are patent application and registration, patent validity and term as well as invalidation actions and lawsuits.

Meanwhile, Korea implements the Drug Approval-Patent Linkage programme, and the PAA regulates the programme.

There are no patentability requirements that are specific to pharmaceuticals or medical devices, and general patentability requirements will apply.

It is possible to obtain an improvement patent in Korea for novel medical uses, dosage regimes and selected patient populations. For this, the novel medical uses, dosage regimes or selected patient populations must be specifically described in the claim of the patent while satisfying the general requirements of novelty and inventiveness. In addition, experimental results supporting the effects of the drug, such as pharmacological data or some form of specific information that can substitute such experimental results, must be described in the patent specification.

The act of selling such patented pharmaceuticals labelled with the registered medical uses, dosage regimes or selected patient population without permission from the patent owner constitutes patent infringement.

Korea implements a system where the patent term for pharmaceuticals may be extended by up to five years for periods that meet certain requirements in the drug approval process during which the patent inevitably could not be practiced. Specifically, in the case of a pharmaceutical manufactured with a novel active substance as its active ingredient which has received marketing authorisation for the first time in Korea, a term extension equal to the sum of the period elapsed for clinical trials and review by MFDS may be granted a single time.

An application for patent term extension must be filed with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) within three months from the date of market approval, and the application must be made under the name of all co-owners when it is jointly owned. A third party may file a lawsuit seeking the revocation of the patent term extension.

Patent infringement on pharmaceuticals or medical devices occurs when a patent is practised without the consent of the patent owner. A patent is practised when a pharmaceutical or a medical device is manufactured, sold, used, leased, imported or offered for sale. In Korea, applying for marketing authorisation itself does not constitute patent infringement. It is possible to file a lawsuit based on the threat of infringement even if actual infringement has yet to materialise. The party claiming the threat of infringement should establish that there is a “likelihood of infringement” by a third party. A decision ordering product disposal and facility removal can be obtained.

Patent infringement is not found for:

  • practising of the patent for research and experimental purposes;
  • existing pharmaceuticals or devices at the time of patent application;
  • acts of combining two or more pharmaceuticals; and
  • pharmaceuticals resulting from the combination of two or more pharmaceuticals.

The Korean government can grant to itself or third parties compulsory licences on patents whose non-commercial practice is necessitated for public good during times of emergency or crises. Upon the decision by the chief of KIPO, compulsory licences can be granted to third parties in the following cases:

  • if a patent is not sufficiently practised in Korea for three years without justifiable grounds;
  • if there are findings of unfair trade practices by the executive or judicial authorities that call for remedial measures; or
  • if the practice of the patent is necessary for exporting pharmaceuticals to the importing countries.

The patent owner or the exclusive licensee can seek compensation of damages and an injunction by filing an infringement lawsuit. A preliminary injunction can be separately filed to expeditiously prevent the infringing product from entering the market by way of product disposal and facility removal. It is typical for the party accused of patent infringement to defend its action by filing a patent invalidation action or lawsuit. There are multiple cases in which the patent owner and the exclusive licensee file the patent infringement lawsuit and request a preliminary injunction at the same time.

The PAA provides that the generic entrant should declare its position on the patent of the original that is listed on the drug patent list on which the MFDS registers and maintains patents on drugs. In other words, the generic entrant should specify whether it plans to enter the market after the expiration of the patent term, obtain a grant of licence or challenge the validity of the patent. The generic entrant should establish that it has notified the patent owner of such declaration to obtain market approval.

The owner of valid intellectual property rights on pharmaceuticals or medical devices can make both civil (request for injunction and compensation of damages) and criminal claims against the manufacturer or seller of the counterfeits. Moreover, the Korea Customs Service should notify the owner of IP rights if its agents discover suspected counterfeits. Upon notification, the right-holder can request that such counterfeits do not receive customs clearance.

The Trademark Act provides that a trade mark which indicates, in a common manner, the quality, efficacy or usage of the product, lacks distinctiveness and thus cannot be registered. The provision also applies to pharmaceuticals and medical devices. In addition, for pharmaceuticals and medical devices, it is not permitted to register as a trade mark a brand name that is widely known among consumers.

In the case of parallel importation of authentic goods, whether such importation is allowed varies among cases. If the owner of the Korean trade mark and the foreign trade mark is the same, products distributed overseas can also be sold locally. However, if such is not the case, the importation and local sale of the products that were distributed overseas is prohibited under the principle of territoriality.

Like other products, pharmaceuticals and medical devices can receive IP protection under trade dress or design. The Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (UCPA) provides for trade dress rights, whereas the Design Act provides for design rights.

In Korea, data exclusivity is protected during the period for post-marketing surveillance (PMS). PMS periods vary depending on the types of pharmaceuticals:

  • six years for a new drug, a new combination drug and a drug with a different route of administration;
  • four years for a drug having a new indication; and
  • ten years for orphan drugs (11 years for children’s orphan drugs).

Korea does not distinguish between chemical drugs and biologics when it comes to data exclusivity.

Of note, the National Assembly passed an amendment to the PAA on 1 February 2023, which will repeal the drug re-examination system and introduce a comprehensive risk management system that integrates safety management policies after the drug’s commercial release. This amendment repeals re-examination-related policies and introduces provisions for an independent data exclusivity system, which previously relied on drug re-examination. Furthermore, the new provisions expand the scope to ensure that drugs approved with new clinical data also benefit from data exclusivity, in addition to conventional drugs subject to re-examination.

The amendment to the PAA sets the data exclusivity period for each drug type to be the same as the current re-examination period, and drugs approved with new clinical trial data newly subject to data exclusivity can obtain a data exclusivity period of four years. While this amendment has not been officially announced yet, the MFDS stated that it will be officially announced sometime in February 2024. Once announced, it will go into effect in one year from the announcement.

In order to effectively respond to pandemic issues such as COVID-19, the Special Act for the Promotion of Development and Emergency Supply of Medical Products to Respond to Public Health Crisis was both enacted and implemented on 9 March 2021. In the case of pharmaceuticals and medical devices designated as public health emergency response medical products:

  • an expedited review procedure will apply; and
  • the MFDS may take necessary measures to improve distribution with respect to the distributors, sales procedures, sales volumes and sales conditions of the relevant products.

The MFDS had published its clinical trial follow-up policy for 2021. According to the policy, in consideration of the difficulties in visiting hospitals due to the spread of COVID-19, phone counselling and prescriptions, proxy prescriptions and drug delivery to trial participants would be temporarily permitted during the clinical trials. In addition, the MFDS published guidelines titled “Considerations for Development of a COVID-19 Treatment” (14 April 2021) and “Considerations for Development of a COVID-19 Vaccine” (15 June 2021) detailing the pre-clinical and clinical trial requirements for market authorisation of COVID-19 treatments and vaccines.

Of note, the “Temporary Untact Treatment Permission Plan” (MOHW Notice No 2020-889, 16 December 2020) ended on 1 June 2023. Consequently, a new guideline for untact clinical trial operation seems to be necessary, as its legal basis no longer exists. However, there appears to be no plan for such a guideline at the moment.

Relatedly, the FDA announced a guideline for Decentralised Clinical Trials (DCT) in May 2023, defined as a “clinical trial where some or all of the trial-related activities occur at locations other than traditional clinical trial sites”. MFDS has also announced its intention to enact a guideline for companies to pursue DCT in Korea, although it has not provided a detailed timeline.

Based on the Special Act for the Promotion of Development and Emergency Supply of Medical Products to Respond to Public Health Crisis, emergency approvals for the use of pharmaceuticals or medical devices can be granted if it is deemed necessary for appropriately responding to a public health emergency or if there is a request from the chiefs of the relevant authorities in the central government. In the case of pharmaceuticals or medical devices that received emergency approval, it is possible to supply them either through importation or manufacture without obtaining market approval.

MFDS officials have traditionally been required to conduct an on-site inspection on overseas manufacturing plants for pharmaceuticals and medical devices. As a result of COVID-19, since 2020, the MFDS implemented a policy of document reviews rather than on-site inspections. However, it announced the plan to resume the on-site inspection on overseas manufacturing plants in 2023 as Korea and most of the other countries are phasing out of COVID-19, although a detailed timeline for resuming the on-site inspections has not been solidified in Korea.

There are no restrictions or flexibilities concerning import/export procedures that have been introduced in relation to medicines or medical devices due to COVID-19, other than the special provision on authorisation for importation explained in 11.1 Special Regulation for Commercialisation or Distribution of Medicines and Medical Devices and 11.3 Emergency Approvals of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices.

Under the PAA, telemedicine between the doctor and the patient is not allowed in principle. However, around March 2020, the MOHW made a public notice titled “Measures on Temporarily Allowing Phone Counselling, Prescription and Proxy Prescription”. Pursuant to the public notice, telemedicine, drug prescription and courier delivery of drugs were temporarily allowed during COVID-19 pandemic. The temporary untact diagnosis ended on 1 June 2023, with the decreased COVID-19 threat level. Currently, untact diagnosis is allowed in a limited scope via temporary pilot programmes.

Around December 2021, the National Assembly proposed an amendment to the Patent Act, which allows compulsory licences in cases of national emergency or extreme emergency if non-commercial practice of patents is necessary for public good. However, the amendment was not passed. There has not yet been any other announcement by the Korean government on compulsory licences.

There are no liability exemptions introduced in connection with COVID-19 vaccines or treatments.

There are no regulations regulating the requisition or conversion of manufacturing sites due to COVID-19.

There are no notable changes to the system of public procurement of medicines and medical devices due to COVID-19.

Lee & Ko

Hanjin Building
63 Namdaemun-ro
Jung-gu Seoul
04532
South Korea

+82 2 772 3036

+82 2 772 4001/2

keumnang.park@leeko.com www.leeko.com
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Lee & Ko has become one of Korea’s premier full-service law firms, widely recognised for its leadership and outstanding success in every area of legal practice. As has been confirmed in numerous reviews conducted by Korea’s major media outlets, as well as ratings produced by international law firm rating services, Lee & Ko enjoys one of the highest levels of client satisfaction and a particularly excellent reputation for the quality of the firm’s legal services. Lee & Ko’s healthcare practice group of more than 70 professionals focuses on providing legal services expertly tailored to meet the needs of clients with specific concerns around healthcare and related matters, including pharma, bio, medical devices, food and beverage products, medical data with AI application, genome analysis, DTC, tobacco and cosmetics.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.