Local conglomerates typically act as sponsors for infrastructure projects. These include San Miguel Corporation, Metro Pacific Investments Corporation, Aboitiz Equity Ventures, Ayala Corporation and other groups. Local sponsors may also form consortia with foreign or local partners that have the technical expertise to undertake a particular component or phase of the project. However, given the relaxation of restrictions on foreign equity in public services and renewable energy (“RE”) (see Section 1.3 Structuring the Deal), foreign investors may be inclined to take a more active role and not limit themselves to acting as minority investors or technical partners.
Local banks play a major role in arranging and financing infrastructure projects. Multilateral institutions (such as the Asian Development Bank) and other international financial institutions (such as the Japan Bank for International Cooperation, Korea Export-Import Bank and China International Trade and Investment Corporation) also participate in financing infrastructure projects.
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are governed by the Build-Operate-and-Transfer Law (Republic Act. No. 6957; the BOT Law) and its 2022 implementing regulations (the BOT Rules).
Under this framework, the private sector may participate in the construction, rehabilitation, improvement, expansion, operation, financing and maintenance of projects which are normally undertaken by the public sector.
PPP projects may include infrastructure or development projects, such as the following and their related facilities: highways and roads; port infrastructure and related services; airports; power generation, transmission and distribution; renewable energy and related infrastructure; telecommunications; IT networks and infrastructure; irrigation; water supply, sewerage, and drainage; and others.
The principal contractual arrangements for PPPs include build-operate-and-transfer (BOT), build-and-transfer, build-own-and-operate (BOO), build-lease-and-transfer and other variants. Contractual schemes not expressly contemplated by the statute may also be undertaken, subject to approval by the President.
PPP projects may be structured as either availability PPPs or concession-based PPPs. In an availability PPP, the implementing agency (IA) contracts with a private entity to provide a public good or service at a constant capacity for a given fee (capacity fee) and a separate charge for usage of the public good or service (usage fee). Fees or tariffs are regulated by contract to provide for the recovery of debt service, fixed operating expenses and a return on equity. In a concession PPP, the IA grants a private entity the right to build, operate and charge the public for the use of the good or service, a fee or tariff that is regulated by the government.
Generally, the BOT Law also provides that for BOT and similar arrangements, the private proponent will be repaid by collecting reasonable tolls, fees, rentals and/or charges for a fixed term, which must not exceed 50 years. (The private proponent in other contract variants may be compensated using a different structure.)
PPP projects are also subject to approval by different government approving bodies (each an Approving Body) as follows:
Additionally, a proposed PPP contract is subject to review by the procuring entity’s statutory counsel, such as the Office of the Government Corporate Counsel or Office of the Solicitor General. The head of the IA or LGU concerned (or the procuring entity) approves the reviewed PPP contract. If required, the Department of Finance (DOF) should also review the draft contract of (i) projects of national government agencies, (ii) local projects involving funds of the national government and (iii) local projects requiring ICC approval.
PPP projects may be awarded through public bidding or by the submission of an unsolicited proposal.
Public Bidding of Solicited Projects
Public bidding may be initiated through pre-qualification or simultaneous qualification proceedings. The goal of the bidding process is to choose the private partner in an open, competitive, fair and efficient manner.
In a pre-qualification proceeding, upon approval of the parameters and terms of a PPP project, the procuring entity must publish a notice inviting prospective proponents to pre-qualify and bid. Prospective bidders have at least 15 calendar days from the last publication of the invitation to pre-qualify to prepare their pre-qualification requirements (eg, proof of due incorporation, experience or track record and financial capability). These will be evaluated by a pre-qualification, bids and awards committee (PBAC) within 20 calendar days after the deadline for submission of the pre-qualification documents.
Alternatively, when necessary, the procuring entity may conduct a simultaneous qualification and call for the simultaneous submission of qualification requirements and bid proposals.
Unsolicited proposals (USPs) for projects may also be accepted from a private proponent, provided that (i) such projects involve a new concept in technology and/or are not part of the government’s list of priority projects, (ii) no direct government guarantee, subsidy or equity is required, and (iii) the procuring entity has invited by publication comparative or competitive proposals and no other proposal is received for a period of 60 working days.
If no comparative or competitive proposal or no complying bid is received, the project will be immediately awarded to the original proponent. If another proponent submits a lower price proposal, the original proponent will have the right to match that price within 30 working days from receipt of a notification of the result of the bid. If the original proponent fails to match the comparative proposal, then the project contract will be awarded to the comparative proponent; otherwise, it will be awarded to the original proponent.
If the procuring entity accepts the USP, a letter of acceptance will be issued, and the proponent will be granted the status of an “original proponent”. The head of the procuring entity will then endorse the same to the relevant Approving Body, which will determine the reasonable rate of return appropriate for the project and other parameters for negotiation. Negotiations between the procuring entity and the original proponent will then commence with the procuring entity being required to submit a report to the Approving Body on the results of such negotiations within seven calendar days after the negotiation period. After the issuance of a certification of successful negotiation, the PBAC will publish the invitation for comparative proposals.
Pending bill on strengthening PPPs
There is a pending legislative proposal to amend the BOT Law (the PPP Bill) and streamline the PPP process. It is expected that some version of the PPP Bill will be enacted soon. The changes introduced by the PPP Bill include the following:
Note that the final version of the PPP Bill (if enacted into law) may include different features than those described above.
Under the Local Government Code (Republic Act No. 7160 or the LGC), LGUs are authorised to enter into contracts with any duly pre-qualified contractor for the financing, construction, operation and maintenance of infrastructure facilities under BOT arrangements, subject to the applicable provisions of the BOT Law and other relevant laws. Aside from the BOT Law, the LGC and the local PPP ordinances provide for the legal framework for the local PPP projects.
Some of the major issues that need to be considered when structuring PPP projects are as follows:
The most important factor in structuring the deal is choosing the best PPP contractual arrangement. The appropriate PPP contractual arrangement will depend on a project’s goals and coverage. Legal, tax, financial and financing needs and restrictions may influence the choice. The BOT Law outlines the typical BOT variants. Projects undertaken through the BOO scheme or through contractual arrangements or schemes other than those deﬁned under the BOT Law require approval by the President.
Variations/Adjustments to Permitted Tariffs, Tolls or Charges
Under the BOT Law, the tolls and/or other charges under a PPP contract may be subject to adjustment based on an approved formula/adjustment schedule in such contract. For this purpose, prior to bidding, the concerned procuring entity shall secure the advice of the relevant regulatory body for such formula. In case the regulatory body disapproves the proposed adjustment, the procuring entity may allow the project proponent to recover the shortfall through measures allowed in the contract, subject to the Constitution and applicable laws. Additionally, if the adjustment of tolls and/or other charges is approved by the appropriate regulatory body, but the procuring entity falls to implement such adjustment, then the project proponent may recover the shortfall through measures allowed in the contract.
The BOT Rules also provide that contract variations may be approved by the head of the procuring entity, provided that:
For contract variations that do not meet the foregoing requirements, approval by the relevant Approving Body is required. Failure to observe this rule renders the contract variation void.
The government may provide support or contribution to solicited projects, such as credit enhancements, direct government guarantees, and direct government subsidies. A direct government subsidy is an agreement whereby the government or IA will:
Notably, in the case of unsolicited projects, direct government guarantees, direct government subsidies and direct government equity are prohibited.
Under the Constitution, land of the public domain, including forests and other natural resources, are owned by the State. No natural resources may be alienated, except for agricultural land. The restrictions on the use and ownership of land are further discussed in 5.2 Licence Requirements.
Additionally, the exploration, development and utilisation of natural resources must be under the full control and supervision of the state. The state may either directly undertake such activities or enter into co-production, joint venture, or production sharing agreements with Filipino citizens or corporations at least 60% owned by Filipino citizens. Such agreements may be for a period not exceeding 25 years, renewable for not more than 25 years, and under such terms and conditions as may be provided by law.
For public utilities, the Constitution requires that:
The Renewable Energy Act (Republic Act No. 9513) (the RE Act) establishes the framework for the accelerated development of RE resources and the development of a strategic programme to increase its utilisation.
RE resources refer to energy resources that do not have an upper limit on the total quantity to be used. Such resources are renewable on a regular basis, and their renewal rate is relatively rapid to consider availability over an indefinite period. These include biomass, solar, wind, geothermal, ocean energy, hydropower and other emerging renewable energy technologies.
Under the implementing rules of the RE Act (RE Rules), RE developers must register with the Department of Energy (DOE). Registration is not possible unless the RE developer holds a valid RE service/operating contract (the RE Contract). The RE Rules previously reserved the award of RE Contracts to corporations whose capital is at least 60% owned by Filipino citizens.
Recently, the Department of Justice (DOJ) opined that the exploration, development, and utilisation of certain RE resources, including solar and wind, are not covered by the foreign equity restrictions under the Constitution (see DOJ Opinion No. 21, s. 2022; the DOJ Opinion). According to the DOJ, the term “natural resources” as used in the Constitution contemplates only those that are susceptible of appropriation and which are exhaustible in nature. The DOJ further explained that the term “all forces of potential energy”, which is reserved for Philippine nationals under the Constitution, does not include kinetic energy sources, such as solar and wind energy.
The DOE issued DOE Department Circular No. 2022-11-0034 (the DOE Amendment), amending the RE Rules and other related issuances. The DOE’s current position is that RE Contracts for the exploration, development, production and utilisation of solar and wind energy may be awarded to 100% foreign-owned corporations.
However, the DOJ Opinion is not binding upon the courts. Actions of an administrative agency may be set aside by the courts if there is an error of law, lack of jurisdiction or grave abuse of discretion clearly conflicting with either the letter or the spirit of a legislative enactment. Thus, if a case is brought before the courts questioning the DOJ Opinion and DOE Amendment, there is a risk that the Supreme Court may rule that the 60% minimum Filipino ownership requirement should still apply to RE projects.
Public utilities were previously considered synonymous with public services. The Public Service Act (Commonwealth Act No. 146) (PSA) provided a broad definition of public services. The PSA also provides that no “public service” may operate without possessing a valid and subsisting certificate known as “certificate of public convenience” or “certificate of public convenience and necessity” (CPC/CPCN) issued by the relevant regulatory authority, confirming that the operation of said service and the authorisation to do business will promote the public interests in a proper and suitable manner. The PSA provides that CPCs/CPCNs may be issued only in favour of Filipino citizens or to corporations or other entities organised under Philippine law and at least 60% owned by Filipino citizens.
The recently enacted Republic Act No. 11659 (the PSA Amendment) draws a distinction between “public utilities” and “public services”. That statute limited the term “public utilities” to a public service that operates, manages, or controls for public use any of the following: (1) distribution of electricity; (2) transmission of electricity; (3) petroleum and petroleum products pipeline transmission systems; (4) water pipeline distribution systems and wastewater pipeline systems, including sewerage pipeline systems; (5) seaports; and (6) public utility vehicles.
Consequently, it appears that the 60% minimum Filipino ownership requirement no longer applies to businesses which are not included in the new enumeration of public utilities under the PSA Amendment. Please note, however, that the 40% cap is not based solely on the PSA, but primarily on Article XII of the Constitution (which cannot be amended by statute). There is some risk that the proposed amendment to the PSA may be challenged before courts on the ground that the same is unconstitutional.
There are still a number of restrictions upon foreign participation in the operation of public services, however. Under the PSA Amendment, any transaction that results in the grant of direct or indirect control to a foreigner over a public service may be suspended or prohibited by the President in the interest of national security.
The PSA Amendment also provides that businesses which are presently considered “public services” may subsequently be reclassified as “public utilities” by congressional act. The President may, upon recommendation of the NEDA, recommend to Congress the classification of a public service as public utility on the basis for the following criteria:
Additionally, the PSA Amendment introduces the concept of “critical infrastructure,” ie, any public service which owns, uses or operates systems and assets, whether physical or virtual, so vital that the incapacity or destruction of such would have a detrimental impact on national security, including telecommunications and other such vital services as may be declared by the President. Public services that are engaged in the operation and management of “critical infrastructure” remain subject to foreign ownership restrictions, ie, foreign nationals may not own more than 50% of such entities unless their country grants reciprocal rights of ownership to Philippine nationals.
The PSA Amendment does not provide for an exclusive enumeration of what constitutes critical infrastructure. Only “telecommunications” is specifically cited as constituting critical infrastructure. Instead, the determination of what public services constitute critical infrastructure is left to the President.
Under the BOT Rules, for purposes of pre-qualification, the contractor proposed to undertake the construction of the project must be licensed and accredited by the Philippine Contractors Accreditation Board (PCAB) in the case of a Filipino contractor, or by an equivalent accreditation institution in the contractor’s country of origin, in the case of a foreign contractor. Once the project proponent is awarded the project, such foreign contractor must also secure a licence and accreditation from the PCAB.
Under the PCAB Law (Republic Act No. 4566), no person or entity may engage in the construction contracting business without first obtaining a contractor’s licence from the PCAB.
The PCAB issues two types of licences:
Previously, the issuance of Regular Licences was generally reserved for Filipino contractors, or entities organised under Philippine law and at least 60% of whose capital is owned by Philippine nationals. Foreign contractors were only allowed to apply for and obtain Special Licences (for a specific project). The legality of this nationality restriction was recently struck down by the Supreme Court, which declared that these nationality restrictions were adopted by the PCAB in excess of its authority (as the PCAB Law does not provide for any nationality restrictions).
Due to the recent relaxation of restrictions of foreign investments in the RE sector and the operation of “public services”, it is expected that these sectors may be more active in next few years.
Based on the list of projects published by the PPP Centre, it appears that currently active sectors include transportation, roads, water, power and information technology.
Security may be created over both real property and personal property.
Real property generally refers to immovable property such as land and other real estate. (See Article 415 of the Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386) for a list of the properties considered real or immovable property.)
Security interests over real properties located within the Philippines are typically documented in the form of a real estate mortgage.
A registered mortgage creates a real right or lien over the property mortgaged, which right is enforceable against the whole world.
To constitute a valid real estate mortgage, the following requisites must be present:
The Property Registration Decree (Presidential Decree No. 1529) provides that a real estate mortgage must be signed by the persons executing the same and two witnesses and acknowledged before a notary public. Where the mortgage consists of two or more pages, each page must be signed on the left margin thereof by the signatories and their witnesses, and all the pages sealed with the notarial seal, and this must be stated in the acknowledgment.
Personal property generally refers to chattels and other movable properties. (See Articles 416 and 417 of the Civil Code for a list of the properties considered personal property.)
The Personal Property Security Act (Republic Act No. 11057) (PPSA) provides for the creation, perfection, determination of priority, establishment of a centralised notice registry, and enforcement of security interests in personal property (tangible and intangible), except aircraft and ships.
Under the implementing regulations of the PPSA (PPSA Rules), a security interest may be created by (1) a security agreement, (2) an operating lease for not less than one year, or (3) the sale of an account receivable (unless otherwise stipulated by the parties in the document of sale).
After a security interest has been created, it may be perfected by:
On perfection, a security interest becomes effective against third parties.
While the PPSA is already considered effective, the implementation of its provisions is conditioned upon the establishment and operation of a centralised and nationwide electronic registry, where security interests created under the PPSA may be registered. The Land Registration Authority (LRA) launched the Philippines Personal Property Security Registry (PPSR) at www.philppsr.lra.gov.ph. However, the LRA has clarified that the PPSR should not yet be considered as having been established and operational as contemplated by the PPSA. Nevertheless, the parties may agree to perfect the security interest over personal property through other modes of perfection, such as possession or control (through the execution of a control agreement).
Under the PPSA, a security agreement may provide for the creation of a security interest in future personal property or after-acquired assets, but the security interest in that personal property is created only when the grantor acquires rights in it or the power to encumber it.
Future real property cannot be the object of a contract of mortgage because under the Civil Code, the mortgagor must have absolute ownership and free disposal of the property mortgaged.
The fees for the registration of security interests under the PPSA will likely only be available once the PPSR is established. In the meantime, a security agreement over personal property may be registered with the Chattel Mortgage Registry in the principal place of business of the security grantor and in the place where the property is located. In such cases, the fees for the registration of chattel mortgage are a base fee of PHP8,796, plus 0.45% of the amount secured in excess of PHP1,700,000.
The fees for the registration of real estate mortgage are a base fee of PHP8,796 plus 0.45% of the amount secured in excess of PHP1,700,000.
Under the PPSA, the security agreement must be in writing and contain a general description of the collateral. To register the agreement in the PPSR, the relevant fees must be paid and a notice (i) identifying the security interest, (ii) identifying the grantor of the security interest, (iii) identifying the secured creditor or an agent of the creditor, and (iv) describing the collateral must be filed with the electronic registry. The grantor of the security interest must also authorise registration of the agreement either (i) in a separate instrument in writing or (ii) by signing the security agreement itself.
The real estate mortgage must specify the subject property and be recorded in the Registry of Deeds to bind third persons.
The requirements for a valid corporate guarantee are:
Once the PPSR is operational, notices of security interest in personal property may be searched electronically.
The existence of a lien over real property may be verified by conducting a search at the Register of Deeds with jurisdiction over the place where the property is located. Currently, there is no central registry of liens over real property, however.
Once the PPSR is operational, the effectiveness of the notice of security interest on personal property may be terminated by registering a termination notice that identifies (1) the initial notice by its registration number; and (2) each secured creditor who authorises the registration of the termination notice.
A mortgage on registered land may be discharged or cancelled by filing an instrument requesting the cancellation of the annotation with the Register of Deeds.
Under the PPSA, the secured creditor may enforce its security through: (i) judicial process, or (ii) extra-judicial process, including (a) the sale of the secured assets through public or private disposition or (b) retention of collateral.
If judicial intervention is necessary to take possession of the collateral or if the grantor asserts that the retaking is wrongful or otherwise refuses to surrender possession, the secured creditor may file an action for replevin for the recovery of the collateral, and ask the court to allow it to retain the collateral during the pendency of the action.
Upon default by a debtor that has secured its obligations by a mortgage on real properties, the creditor is entitled to foreclose the real estate mortgage, either judicially (by filing a case in court) or extrajudicially (when the document of mortgage contains a stipulation irrevocably appointing the creditor as the debtor’s attorney-in-fact to sell the mortgaged property upon default).
The Supreme Court has recognised that parties to a contract may validly stipulate that such contract shall be governed by foreign law, provided that the law chosen does not violated Philippine law or public policy and bears a substantive relationship to the transaction.
However, a Philippine court may, in disregard of any provision of such law, apply the laws of the Philippines:
Further, under the rules of court, there is no judicial notice of any foreign law. Like any other fact, it must be pleaded and proved. If the foreign law is not properly pleaded or proved, the court will assume that the foreign law is the same as Philippine law.
A judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction is considered conclusive in case of a judgment upon a specific thing and is considered presumptive evidence of a right as between the parties and their successors in interest, in case of a judgment against a person. However, the foreign judgment may be repelled by evidence of want of jurisdiction, want of notice to the party, collusion, fraud or clear mistake of law or fact.
Foreign Arbitral Award
The Philippines is a party to the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention). Thus, the Philippines applies the provisions of the New York Convention to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, and such arbitral awards will be recognised and enforced by Philippine courts, subject to the defences against recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards set out in Article V of such convention.
A foreign arbitral award, when confirmed by a local trial court, will be immediately executory and enforced in the same manner as final and executory decisions of local courts.
See 4.2 Restrictions on the Granting of Security.
Under the Manual of Foreign Exchange Transactions (MORFXT) of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), foreign loans are loans provided either by (1) local banks in foreign currency or (2) non-resident creditors (regardless of currency of denomination). Generally, foreign loans that are obtained by or guaranteed by the public sector require prior BSP approval (ie, the terms of the loans must be approved by the BSP before the loan agreements are signed). In contrast, private sector foreign loans that are not publicly guaranteed do not need the prior approval of the BSP. However, note that each disbursement under both types of the foregoing loans should be registered with the BSP.
The non-registration (or where applicable, non-approval) of such loans or disbursements does not affect the legality or validity of the loan. Approval and registration are required only so that the payments of interest and principal on the loan will be eligible for servicing using foreign exchange purchased from the Philippine banking system.
Note that in the imminence of or during a foreign exchange crisis or in times of national emergency, the Monetary Board, with the approval of the President, may temporarily restrict sales of foreign exchange and gold by the BSP and require any resident to deliver any foreign exchange obtained by such person to the BSP or to any bank or agent designated by the BSP, at the then effective exchange rate or rates.
Under the Foreign Bank Liberalisation Act (Republic Act No. 10641), a foreign bank can participate in foreclosure sales of real property mortgaged in its favour, subject to the following limitations:
In relation to shares of stock, generally, a security interest over shares of stock in a Philippine corporation may be created in favour of a foreign lender. However, if the Philippine corporation is subject to a foreign equity limitation, the foreign lender can acquire and take title to the shares only to the extent permitted under the applicable foreign equity limitation.
Generally, a foreign-owned entity will need to obtain a licence from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a branch or set up a local entity. In case of an establishment of a branch office or a domestic corporation that will have more than 40% foreign ownership (in instances when it is allowed), there is a minimum capitalisation requirement of USD200,000.
The Foreign Investments Act (Republic Act No. 7042) (FIA) mandates the formulation of the Foreign Investment Negative List (FINL), which is a list of areas of economic activity whose foreign ownership is limited to a certain level of equity (generally 40%). The FINL contains (among others) (i) List A, which enumerates the areas of activities reserved to Philippine nationals by mandate of the Constitution and specific laws, and (ii) List B, which enumerates the areas of activities where foreign ownership is limited for reasons of security, defence, risk to health and morals, and protection of small and medium scale enterprises.
Certain requirements apply if the borrower will purchase foreign exchange from the Philippine banking system to pay the loan. The MORFXT requires prior BSP approval for the following:
For private sector loans that are not publicly guaranteed, the borrower is required to submit a notice to the BSP at least one month prior to the target date of purchase of foreign exchange.
There are no Philippine restrictions upon the maintenance by Philippine companies of FX accounts offshore.
PPP contracts must be submitted to the PPP Centre for monitoring of implementation. An original signed copy of the contract must be submitted to the relevant Approving Body and the PPP Centre within five calendar days after signing thereof by the procuring entity.
For the financing or refinancing of a project, the private proponent is required to submit a copy of the loan or financing documents to the procuring entity, and the PPP Centre within 15 calendar days from its execution. Failure to provide a copy of the loan or financing document will be considered an event of default of the private proponent, and the latter will be prohibited from holding the procuring entity liable for any obligations arising from the loan or financing documents.
As discussed in 1.3 Structuring the Deal, all lands of the public domain, including forests and other natural resources, are owned by the state. No natural resources may be alienated, except for agricultural land.
Lands of the public domain are classified into agricultural, forest or timber, mineral and national parks. Only agricultural land is alienable. It should be noted that there are special rules applicable for the use of forest land, lands designated as protected areas, foreshore land, marshy land and land covered with water bordering upon shores or riverbanks.
Public land remains part of the inalienable land of the public domain unless the State is shown to have reclassified or alienated them to private persons. A positive act of the government is necessary to enable such reclassification.
Public agricultural land
Alienable and disposable agricultural land of the public domain may be leased (i) by private corporations at least 60% owned by Filipino citizens for a period not exceeding 25 years, up to a maximum of 1,000 hectares; or (ii) by individual Filipino citizens, up to a maximum of 500 hectares.
No private land may be transferred or conveyed except to individuals, corporation or associations qualified to acquire or hold lands of the public domain.
By way of an exception to the rule proscribing foreign ownership of private lands, individual foreigners may own private land if such foreigners (i) acquired the land by hereditary succession or (ii) were previously natural-born citizens of the Philippines who lost their citizenship, subject to a maximum area of 5,000 square metres in the case of urban land (or three hectares in the case of rural land to be used by them for business or other purposes).
Under Presidential Decree No. 471, a lease of land to non-Philippine nationals may not exceed a term of 25 years, extendible for another 25 years. By way of exception, the Investors’ Lease Act (Republic Act No. 7652) (ILA) and its implementing regulations provide that a foreign investor may lease private lands for not more than 50 years, renewable once for another 25 years, provided that:
This type of lease will be authorised only for purposes of, and in connection with, the establishment of industrial estates, factories, assembly or processing plants, agro-industrial enterprises, land development for tourism, industrial or commercial use and/or other similar priority productive endeavours as determined by the Board of Investments.
Under Presidential Decree No. 1067 (Water Code), all water belongs to the state, and cannot be the subject of acquisition. However, the state may allow the use of water by administrative concession, which is under the regulation of the National Water Resources Board (NWRB).
Under the implementing regulations of the Water Code, only Philippine nationals or entities organised under Philippine law and at least 60% of whose capital is owned by Philippine nationals may file an application for a water permit.
Agent and trust concepts are recognised in the Philippines. The Civil Code provides that in an agency contract, a person binds himself to render some service or to do something in representation or on behalf of another, with the consent or authority of the latter.
The Civil Code also recognises the concept of trusts. A person who establishes a trust is called the trustor; one in whom confidence is reposed as regards property for the benefit of another person is known as the trustee; and the person for whose benefit the trust has been created is referred to as the beneficiary.
The BSP Manual of Regulations for Banks defines the trust business as any activity resulting from a trustor-trustee relationship involving the appointment of a trustee by a trustor for the administration and management of funds or properties of the trustor by the trustee for the benefit or advantage of the trustor or of others called beneficiaries. Banks which wish to engage in the business of a trust entity must first obtain authority to do so from the BSP.
In certain financing agreements, especially when the project loans are syndicated, the syndicate appoints a facility and/or paying agent to exercise powers delegated by the syndicate under the loan documents. The duties of the facility agent and paying agent under the loan documents are usually ministerial and administrative in nature. Such duties include receiving documents such as financial statements, notices, reports or other materials from the borrower. However, actions that require the exercise of discretion are referred to and require the approval of the syndicate.
PPP contracts generally allow concessionaires to assign, with the prior consent of the government, their revenues and receivables to the lender or, if the project loans are syndicated, to a common security trustee appointed by the syndicate of lenders to act for and on their behalf. Duties of the security trustee also include safekeeping documents related to the loan and the project.
Preference of credits
Liens on specific property of the borrower have preference on those assets and exclude all others to the extent of the value of the property to which the preference refers. If there are two or more credits with respect to the same movable or immovable property, they are to be satisfied in accordance with the order of preference set out in the Civil Code and other relevant statutes.
In satisfying several preferred credits that are registered with the Register of Deeds, the rule is that the credits take priority in the same order of their registration.
Under the PPSA, the priority of security interests and liens in the same collateral will, in general, be determined according to the time of registration of a notice or perfection by other means, without regard to the order of creation of the security interests and liens. There are also special rules on priority on specific types of property under the PPSA Rules.
Subordination of debt
Parties to a contract are free to agree on such stipulations as they deem fit, provided that the contractual clauses in question are not contrary to law, morals, or public policy. An agreement that the debt will be subordinated to claims of other is generally consistent with local law and hence, should be valid.
A project company that engages in business in the Philippines will need to obtain a licence to do so, either by incorporating as a local company or establishing a Philippine branch with approval of the SEC. Although there are a few projects in which the local project company is organised as a limited partnership, most project companies are organised as stock corporations.
In addition, with respect to projects to be implemented under a contractual arrangement which requires a public utility franchise for its operation, the project proponent must be duly registered with the SEC and at least 60% Filipino-owned, or, if a consortium of local, foreign, or local and foreign firms, Filipinos must have at least 60% interest in said consortium.
For projects that do not require a public utility franchise for its operation, the project proponent may be Filipino or foreign-owned, subject to other nationality restrictions as discussed in 1.3 Structuring the Deal and 5.2 Licence Requirements.
The general law on insolvency that applies generally to Philippine corporations is the Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act (Republic Act No. 10142) (FRIA).
A court-supervised rehabilitation proceeding will result in the issuance of a Commencement Order, which will, among other things:
The lien of a lender holding a security interest will not be impaired, except that the right to enforce said lien may be suspended during the term of the Stay Order. The court, upon recommendation of the rehabilitation receiver, may allow a secured creditor to enforce its security, if the said property is not necessary for the rehabilitation of the borrower.
Notably, a transaction that was entered into by the debtor with intent to defraud may be rescinded or declared null and void, even if it occurred prior to the issuance of the Commencement Order. Certain transactions are presumed to have been entered into with fraudulent intent (eg, those which involve an accelerated payment of a claim to a creditor within 90 days prior to the issuance of the Commencement Order).
Please see 5.4 Competing Security Interests. Generally, the rule is first in time, first in right – ie, credits take priority in the same order in which they were perfected as against third parties.
However, there are rules for determining priority for specific types of personal properties.
Please see 6.2 Impact of Insolvency Services.
The FRIA does not apply to banks, insurance companies, pre-need companies and national and local government agencies or units.
The Insurance Code prohibits Philippine corporations from procuring or obtaining insurance from a foreign insurance company that is not authorised to do insurance business in the Philippines.
There are no restrictions on foreign creditors receiving proceeds from insurance policies over project assets.
Generally, gross income derived by non-resident foreign corporations from sources within the Philippines (such as principal or interest payments) will be subject to a tax equal to 25%, subject to tax treaty relief.
A loan obtained by local companies is subject to documentary stamp taxes (DST) at the rate of 0.75% of the issue price of the loan agreement or debt instrument. A mortgage or pledge is subject to DST at the rate of 0.4% of the amount secured. Under local rules and practice, if the loan and security arrangements are integral parts of the same transaction, only one DST (at the higher rate) applies.
A loan agreement or debt instrument without the proof of payment of DST cannot be notarised and cannot be admitted or used in evidence in any court.
Rules on interest
The Civil Code provides that without an express written stipulation to pay interest, no interest may be collected. However, this rule does not apply to compensatory interest collected as indemnity for damages when there is delay in discharging an obligation consisting of the payment of a sum or money. In such cases, even if there is no stipulation on interest, the creditor is entitled to collect legal interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
While the parties may generally agree on the rate of interest, the courts may reduce such rate if it is found to be unconscionable or contrary to morals or public policy. Usurious interest stipulations may be declared void. Although currently, the BSP has not prescribed a maximum interest rate, the Supreme Court has struck down interest rates for being excessive, unconscionable, and exorbitant, and thus, contrary to public policy, depending on the circumstances (eg, an interest rate of 17% per annum plus penalty interest of 12% per annum was declared void).
The Supreme Court’s guidelines for payment of interest in the concept of damages (ie, default interest) are the following:
Other Protections Afforded to a Borrower
The following are the other protections afforded to a borrower under Philippine law:
Project agreements are typically governed by Philippine law and must comply with the requirements under the BOT Law and the BOT Rules.
Typically, financing agreements involving a cross-border element (eg, involving foreign lenders) are governed by New York or English law. However, the security agreements over property in the Philippines are governed by Philippine law, as required by the Civil Code.
Where the financing is provided by Philippine banks (or local branches of foreign banks) and/or is denominated in local currency, the agreements are typically governed by Philippine law.
The Philippines adheres to the rule of lex situs, ie, property is subject to the law of the country where it is situated. Thus, a security document over properties located in the Philippines will be governed by Philippine law even if the facility agreement is governed by foreign law.