The main sources of real estate law in Kenya are as follows:
Sustainable Real Estate Finance
Sustainable real estate finance continues to gain traction in Kenya, with notable developments including the following:
Affordable Housing Scheme (AHS)
Affordable housing remained one of the most visible themes in the Kenya real estate market. The Affordable Housing Regulations, 2025, which came into effect in July 2025, operationalise parts of the Affordable Housing Act. Project delivery has continued across a number of counties, with official updates showing that, in early 2026, more than 260,000 units were under development countrywide. In December 2025, approximately 4,500 units were handed over under the Mukuru Affordable Housing Project.
Private developers are also investing in affordable housing products independent of the AHS, including TSAVO, HIS Kenya and Acorn Holdings Limited.
Significant Real Estate Deals Over the Last 12 Months
Key projects and deals include the following.
Impact of Inflation Environment and 2025 Interest Rates
In 2025, the Kenyan real estate market was affected less by fresh inflationary pressure and further interest rate increases than by the after-effects of the earlier tightening cycle. CBK progressively reduced the CBK Rate from 10.75% in February to 9% in December 2025, while commercial banks’ weighted average lending rates also trended downward. In practice, however, borrowing costs remained elevated enough to continue affecting affordability, leverage levels and project timing. Developers therefore tended to favour phased developments, prime and income-generating assets and refinancing or alternative sources of capital where available.
CBK also announced the issuance of a revised risk-based credit pricing model anchored on the overnight interbank average rate (KESONIA), signalling a move towards greater pricing transparency and a more market-linked benchmark framework for debt going forward. KESONIA took effect from 1 September 2025 for all new variable-rate Kenya shillings loans and from 28 February 2026 for existing variable-rate Kenya shillings loans.
Impact of Disruptive Technologies
The following digital solutions have been adopted:
These technologies will have the following effects:
The Land Control Bill, 2022 seeks to rationalise the law on dealings in agricultural land with the provisions of the Constitution, the Environmental and Land Court Act, the LA and the LRA. The Bill proposes to introduce Land Control Committees, which will regulate dealings in agricultural land in accordance with the law and traditions, customs and way of life of the community of the controlled area. If enacted, it will be significant for investment, ownership and development transactions involving agricultural land.
The Real Estate Regulation Bill, 2023 seeks to introduce a new framework for regulating real estate agents and projects in general and would repeal the Estate Agents Act, Chapter 533. If enacted, it could have a material effect on the marketing and sale of real estate projects, and on the wider regulatory environment for real estate service providers.
There are two main categories of property rights:
The LA and LRA are the primary statutes that apply to the transfer of real estate title, be it residential, retail, industrial, business or hotels. For community land, the Community Land Act also applies. The SPA is the primary statute governing the transfer of sectional titles.
Conducting Due Diligence
Transfer of title begins with due diligence being performed by the purchaser; see 2.4 Real Estate Due Diligence.
Preparation of an Agreement for Sale
Agreements for sale must generally meet the requirements under Section 38 of the LA and Section 3 of the Law of Contract Act, and therefore must:
The agreement is prepared by the seller’s advocates.
Obtaining Completion Documents
The seller’s advocates obtain the completion documents, which include the title document, the signed transfer document and Land Control Board (LCB) consent (where applicable). The transfer is drafted by the purchaser’s advocates.
Transfer of Title
Upon payment of the full purchase price to the seller or the issuance of suitable undertakings to the seller or the seller’s advocates for payment of the financed balance of the purchase price (if any), the seller’s advocates release the completion documents to the purchaser’s advocates. Thereafter, the transfer is submitted through Ardhisasa for valuation of the property for purposes of assessing the stamp duty payable. Although the roll-out of Ardhisasa has been phased and remains county- and transaction-specific, all valuation of property for stamp duty purposes across the country will be processed through Ardhisasa. All parties to the transaction will be required to have Ardhisasa accounts. Subsequently, the purchaser pays stamp duty and files the transfer at the land registry for registration.
If the property is on Ardhisasa, the transfer is initiated on the platform and signed by the parties electronically. Valuation of the property will be initiated online, and payment of stamp duty done via Ardhipay. When the transfer is registered, the original title and registered documents are collected from the land registry.
The law does not require landowners to insure their titles. Title insurance is not common in Kenya.
Title due diligence in Kenya is not just about the current register entry. Increasingly, purchasers are also undertaking deeper title and development due diligence in order to verify the history and legality of the title and to identify planning, environmental and public land risks that may not be apparent from the register alone.
The purchasers’ advocates conduct due diligence as follows:
Increasingly, purchasers are also instructing professionals such as surveyors and planners to undertake in-depth due diligence over properties to determine whether properties are on a road reserve, airport land, forest land or public utility land, and to confirm beacons and boundaries.
Representations and Warranties
On the purchaser’s insistence, the seller may issue representations and warranties to the effect that:
Representations, warranties and their survival periods are not prescribed by law; they are negotiated by the parties. A seller may cap their liability as at the date of the agreement for sale, while a purchaser may negotiate to extend the seller’s liability until the date of transfer or a reasonable period thereafter. A seller may also cap their financial liability to the purchase price amount.
Enforcement of Representations and Warranties
The agreement for sale gives the purchaser the option to:
Representation and warranty insurance is not common in Kenya.
In addition to those discussedin 1.1 Main Sources of Law, the following laws are also significant:
The starting point is the polluter-pays principal, so primary liability does not automatically attach to a buyer merely because they have acquired contaminated property. However, a buyer may still face regulatory and practical exposure as the current owner or occupier of the property, especially if contamination is ongoing or remediation is required for the continued use of the land. Accordingly, it is critical for a buyer to manage this risk by environmental due diligence and contractual protections such as disclosures, indemnities and remediation obligations on the seller.
Permitted Use
The Physical Planning Act and county laws govern zoning and planning at the national and county levels, respectively. The use or development of land must be in accordance with the National and County Physical and Land Use Development Plans. The permitted use of a parcel of land is usually indicated on some title documents. Where this is not the case, the permitted use can be ascertained by a search at the land registry or survey of Kenya, or by inspecting documents relating to the application and approval of change or extension of use.
Development Agreements
It is possible to enter into development agreements with relevant public authorities in order to facilitate a project; see 4.6 Agreements With Local or Governmental Authorities.
Compulsory Acquisition
Article 40 (3) (b) of the Constitution allows the state to compulsorily acquire land for a public purpose, subject to the fair and prompt compensation of the interested persons. Section 107 of the LA prescribes the process of compulsory acquisition, which takes place in four stages as follows.
Disputes may arise around valuation methodology, delay in payment or whether the acquisition steps were strictly followed.
Taxes in Direct Sale of Real Estate
Capital gains tax (CGT) and stamp duty are applicable in real estate transactions. CGT is paid by the seller at a rate of 15% of the net gains received upon sale of the immovable property. Stamp duty is paid by the purchaser at a rate of 2% of the value of the property if located in a rural area, or 4% of the value of the property if located in an urban area.
The Income Tax Act, Chapter 470 prescribes transfers exempted from CGT, including the transfer of property to a registered family trust. Similarly, the Stamp Duty Act prescribes transfers that are exempt from stamp duty, including transfers to first-time homeowners under the AHS.
The Value Added Tax Act (the “VAT Act”) exempts the sale of land or residential premises from VAT. However, the sale of commercial premises is not exempt from VAT.
In addition, transfer of a business as a going concern is now classified as a supply exempted from VAT. Transfer of an income-generating real estate property could be classified as a transfer of an asset that constitutes a going-concern business, which is exempt from VAT, although this depends on the facts and should not be assumed automatically.
Taxes in Sale of Real Estate by Way of Shares
Where real estate is purchased by way of the acquisition of shares in a land holding company, stamp duty will be paid by the purchaser at the rate of 1% of the value of the acquired shares. The seller will pay CGT at a rate of 15% of the net gain on the transfer of shares. In instances where the holding company is incorporated outside Kenya, CGT will still be payable where the shares or comparable interest derive more than 20% of their value directly or indirectly from immovable property in Kenya.
Transaction Costs
The transaction costs typically borne by the seller are:
The transaction costs typically borne by the purchaser are:
Foreign Ownership of Land
Article 65 of the Constitution prohibits foreigners from owning freehold land. Foreigners may own land based on a leasehold tenure only, and such leases are for a maximum period of 99 years. Any freehold land or lease for a term exceeding 99 years held by a foreigner is deemed to be a lease of a maximum period of 99 years from 27 August 2010.
Under the Constitution, a body corporate is regarded as a Kenyan citizen only if it is wholly owned by Kenyan citizens. Where the property is held in trust, it is regarded as being held by a Kenyan citizen if all its beneficiaries are Kenyan citizens.
Dealings in Agricultural Land
Sections 6 (1) (a) and (c) as read with Section 9 (1) (c) of the LCA prohibit LCBs from approving:
The acquisition of commercial real estate is usually financed as follows:
Where the government is involved, acquisition may be financed by the government itself or by public-private partnerships.
A commercial real estate investor that is borrowing funds to acquire or develop real estate will typically create the following security.
There are no restrictions on granting security over real estate to foreign lenders, nor on making repayments to a foreign lender under a security document or loan agreement. However, like citizens and Kenyan corporations, a foreign lender or foreign security trustee would be required to have an Ardhisasa account in order for security over immovable property to be created in its favour. For security over movable assets, the foreign lender would need to appoint a Kenyan agent (typically, Kenyan counsel) to register relevant notices at the Collateral Registry on its behalf. Foreign lenders should also note the potential implications of Section 974 of the Companies Act, which prohibits a foreign company from carrying on business in Kenya unless it is registered. Recent High Court decisions have not been entirely uniform on the consequences of non-registration: some decisions have taken a strict approach to locus standi while more recent decisions suggest that non-registration does not itself bar a foreign company from suing and that whether it is carrying on business in Kenya is a matter of fact. Accordingly, although a foreign lender may validly take Kenyan security, it should consider the recent High Court decisions.
When granting security, the borrower will be responsible for the following costs:
In addition, the borrower is usually responsible for the lender’s enforcement costs, including legal fees.
The following requirements must be met:
Enforcement of a Legal Charge
Section 90 of the LA prescribes the formalities for the enforcement of a legal charge in the event of default by the borrower. If the borrower is in default for one month, the lender issues a notice of the default to the borrower, requiring the borrower to remedy the default within the notice period (at least three months if the default relates to non-payment). If the borrower fails to do so and the lender opts to exercise statutory power of sale, the lender issues another 40-day notice. Upon lapse of the notice period, the property is valued and sold. The time taken to sell the property would vary according to market demand and could range from a month to more than a year.
The LA also provides additional remedies available to the lender:
Enforcement of these remedies may take longer than exercising the statutory power of sale, especially if the matter is contentious.
Priority of Legal Charges
According to Section 81 of the LA, charges rank according to the order in which they are registered, unless the charge instrument (with the prior written consent of a prior security holder) states otherwise.
According to Section 81 of the LA, charges rank according to the order in which they are registered. However, existing legal charges may be subordinated to newly created legal charges by agreement between the lenders. The holder of the prior registered charge would typically sign a consent form on the subsequent charge, consenting to the creation of the subsequent security and confirming that its security ranks subsequent to the new charge. Lenders can also enter into an intercreditor agreement.
Kenyan courts apply the “polluter pays” principle, under which the person responsible for environmental damage is liable for it.
A lender is not liable for non-compliance with environmental laws since a legal charge does not constitute a transfer of the property. However, when enforcing the security by the appointment of a receiver or the leasing or taking possession of the charged property, a lender qualifies as an “owner‟ under the EMCA and will therefore be liable for non-compliance with environmental laws.
A borrower’s insolvency does not, in and of itself, affect a lender’s security interest. However, where an administrator has been appointed, the consent of the appointed administrator or approval of a court of competent jurisdiction would need to be obtained in order to enforce security. In addition, although an administrator’s proposals may not affect the rights of a secured lender without that lender’s consent, the secured lender’s remedies are still subject to the insolvency process and any applicable court supervision. Security may be challenged if it was granted at a relevant time before insolvency as a preference, or as part of a transaction at an undervalue, and the court’s remedial powers include releasing or discharging that security.
The following taxes apply to loans.
The national government is responsible for developing planning policies and co-ordinating planning by the county governments, and the county governments are responsible for county planning and development.
The principal laws for strategic planning and zoning in Kenya are the Constitution, the Physical Planning Act, the Urban Areas and Cities Act, the National Building Code, 2024, the EMCA, the NCA Act, applicable county legislation, zoning instruments and development plans.
The principal public authorities involved are:
Process
The Physical Planning Act requires development permission to be obtained prior to the improvement of land, which entails the submission of building plans prepared by a qualified planner. The development permit will be issued only if the development complies with zoning laws. The permit may also prescribe conditions for undertaking the development. It is rare for the permit to prescribe requirements on the appearance of the development or method of construction. However, the methods and standards of construction are regulated under the NCA Act.
The Physical Planning Act requires the developer to apply to the relevant county government for development permission. Upon receipt, the county government circulates the application to the relevant state agencies, including the Director of Surveys, the NLC and NEMA, for their comments. The state agencies may object to the issuance of the development permit if the development does not comply with the law. The county government also publishes a notice in the Kenya Gazette and newspapers circulated nationwide, inviting public participation in the proposed development. After considering the comments of the state agencies and the general public, the county government may reject the application or issue the development permit.
In addition, the following approvals are required, among others.
Appeal
A developer may appeal a county government’s decision not to grant development permission before the National or County Liaison Committee (as applicable). The developer may lodge a further appeal against the decision of a County Liaison Committee to the National Liaison Committee. Thereafter, an appeal against a decision of the National Liaison Committee may be made to the ELC.
If NEMA declines to grant the EIA licence or revokes it, the developer may appeal such decision at the National Environment Tribunal (NET) within 60 days. A further appeal may be made to the ELC against the decision of the NET.
If the LCB declines to consent to the development of agricultural land, the developer may appeal to the Provincial Land Control Appeals Board within 30 days of the decision being delivered. A further appeal may be made to the Central Land Control Appeals Board. If the developer is not successful, they can consider effecting a change of use of the land to avoid the need to obtain the LCB consent for the development.
If the NCA declines to register a construction project, the developer may appeal to the Appeals Board established under the NCA Act.
Enforcement
Section 72 of the Physical Planning Act enables the County Executive Committee member for physical and land use planning to issue an enforcement notice to an owner, occupier, agent or developer of land (the “recipient”) if a developer commences development without a development permit, or if any conditions of the development permit are not complied with. The enforcement notice will prescribe the remedial action to be taken by the recipient, who will face imprisonment and/or be subject to fines if they do not comply with the notice.
Section 108 of the EMCA enables NEMA to issue environmental restoration orders instructing the recipient to refrain from causing harm to the environment and/or prescribing remedial action to restore the environment to its original state. The order may also impose fines against persons contravening environmental laws, or may award compensation to those affected by environmental degradation or pollution. The ELC may also issue environmental restoration orders.
Section 112 of the EMCA allows courts to grant environmental easements and conservation orders to preserve environmental resources.
Rule 28 of the NCA Regulations, 2014 empowers the NCA to set up a committee to investigate complaints against contractors and any developments if they are suspected of contravening the law. The committee may recommend the deregistration of a contractor or the revocation or suspension of its licence. Where a contractor is deregistered, all construction contracts being executed by that contractor will be terminated immediately.
The main vehicles for investment in real estate are limited liability companies (LLCs), LLPs and real estate investment trusts (REITs). LLCs are the most common and preferred investment vehicles, but LLPs are beginning to gain traction.
LLCs
LLCs are the most common and preferred investment vehicles, and are regulated by the Companies Act 2015. LLCs have corporate personality, and the liability of the members is limited. Given this, an LLC may own property, enter into contracts, and sue and be sued in the name of the company.
LLCs are tax residents in Kenya and are subjected to tax at a rate of 30%. The taxable income is calculated as the gross revenue less allowable expenses that were wholly and exclusively used in the production of income. Subsequent distribution of dividends by an LLC would be subject to WHT at the rates indicated in the following.
Aperson making payments on dividends and interest to a resident (or non-resident entity with a branch/permanent establishment in Kenya) will pay:
A person making payments on dividends and interest to a non-resident will deduct 15% WHT for both the dividend and interest income.
LLPs
LLPs have gained traction as the real estate investment vehicles of choice, and are regulated by the LLP Act. LLPs have legal personality, and the liability of the partners is limited. LLPs may also own property, enter into contracts, and sue and be sued in the name of the LLP.
An LLP has a minimum of two partners and at least one manager, who must be a natural person. An LLP is not recognised as a distinct person for the purposes of income tax even though it has legal personality. Accordingly, tax on income accrued in or derived from Kenya is accounted for by the partners individually and not by the LLP. Each partner will therefore pay taxes on their share of the profit earned from the LLP based on the applicable income tax rates.
REITs
Following the enactment of the Capital Markets (Real Estate Investment Trusts) (Collective Investment Schemes) Regulations (2013), REITs have gained traction as the premier vehicle for collective investment in real estate in Kenya. They are licensed and regulated by the Capital Markets Authority (CMA). A REIT is structured as an unincorporated common law trust divided into units and established by way of a trust deed. REITs must have a licensed independent REIT trustee who holds the REIT assets on behalf of the investors and a licensed REIT manager who manages the day-to-day affairs of the REIT.
A REIT scheme may be structured as follows.
REITs are beneficial to investors because they are professionally managed and there is minimal capital risk, despite the variety of real estate products available. REITs also enjoy tax exemptions (see 8.5 Tax Benefits).
REITs are available in Kenya (see 5.2 Main Features and Tax Implications of the Constitution of Each Type of Entity). They may be unlisted or listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange. Foreigners are allowed to set up and invest in REITs provided that they comply with the applicable laws. To register a REIT, the prescribed minimum capital requirements (see 5.4 Minimum Capital Requirement) must be met, and the CMA must declare the REIT to be an authorised scheme.
The advantages of REITs are that:
Despite the benefits, there is still a low uptake of investment in REITs in Kenya for various reasons including low investor awareness, market volatility and high set-up costs.
There are no minimum capital requirements for LLPs and private LLCs.
A public LLC must have a minimum capital of KES6,750,000 (approximately USD52,200).
REITs must have:
Private LLCs
A private LLC is generally required to:
Public LLCs (Listed and Non-Listed)
Listed public LLCs are those listed on the Nairobi Stock Exchange. In addition to the governance requirements listed previously in respect of private LLCs, public LLCs are required to obtain a trading certificate for their operations. Furthermore, listed public LLCs must comply with the Capital Markets Act, Chapter 485A and relevant regulations applicable to listed companies.
LLPs
LLPs are required to:
Unless required under their partnership agreements, LLPs are not obliged to convene any meetings, nor to procure an audit on their accounts except during the winding-up and dissolution of the partnership. LLPs are also not required to file tax returns.
REITs
A REIT is required to:
The REIT trustee and the REIT manager are responsible for maintaining proper records in respect of the fund, the scheme and the REIT.
Nominal fees for annual entity maintenance are payable at the companies registry and the LLP registry for LLCs and LLPs, and at the land registry for trusts licensed as REITs. For REITs, additional compliance costs are incurred towards the renewal of the licences of the REIT trustee and REIT manager, and approval fees for any public offerings. The fees are paid to the CMA.
For accounting compliance, the costs will depend on the terms of engagement negotiated with the retained accounting firm.
Leases
Leases for a term of less than 21 years grant the tenant the right to the exclusive use and quiet enjoyment of the leased premises for the lease term. The same is true for leases that have longer terms but do not confer ownership.
Licences
A licence is a permit granted to the licensee to do some act in relation to the real estate (on a non-exclusive basis) that would otherwise constitute trespass.
Easements
An easement is a non-possessory interest in another’s land that allows the holder to use the land (or a portion of it) to a particular extent or requires the owner to undertake or refrain from undertaking an act relating to the land.
Public Rights of Way
This could be a wayleave or a communal right of way. The NLC may authorise a wayleave for the benefit of the national or county government, a public authority or any corporate body to enable them to carry out their functions in relation to the land. The NLC may also authorise a communal right of way for the benefit of the public upon application by a county government, an association or any group of persons.
The LA provides for the following types of leases.
Short-Term Leases
The LA defines a short-term lease as a lease for a term of two years or less without an option for renewal. A short-term lease is also a periodic lease.
Periodic Leases
The following are periodic leases:
Long-Term Leases
A lease is long term if it is for a period over two years. Leases of a period of 21 years and above may confer an ownership interest to the lessee.
Future Leases
Future leases are leases for a term that is to begin on a future date not being later than 21 years after the date on which the lease is executed. A future lease for a period above five years must be registered.
The terms of a lease, including the rent amount, are negotiated by the parties. However, Sections 65 and 66 of the LA impose some covenants on landlords and tenants, including:
The LTA further regulates the revision of rent of the following controlled tenancies:
The terms of a lease are contractual, except for the implied covenants under Sections 65 and 66 of the LA (see 6.3 Regulation of Rents or Lease Terms).
Length of Lease Term
The law does not prescribe the term of a lease, which is contractually agreed by the parties. For commercial leases, the term is typically above five years to avoid creating a controlled tenancy under the LTA.
Furthermore, where the term of the lease is not specified and no provision is made for the giving of notice to terminate a tenancy, the lease is deemed to be a periodic lease pursuant to Section 57 (1) (a) of the LA. In this case, the term of the periodic lease will be the period by reference to which rent is paid.
Finally, where the lease is terminated or the term lapses and the landlord accepts rent and allows the tenant to occupy the premises for at least two subsequent months, a periodic lease from month to month is deemed to have come into force, pursuant to Section 60 (2) of the LA.
Maintenance and Repair Provisions
Sections 65 (1) (c) and (d) of the LA impose an obligation on landlords to keep the exterior parts of leased premises in a proper state of repair, and to ensure dwelling houses are fit for human habitation.
Sections 66 (1) (c) and (e) of the LA impose an obligation on tenants to keep the interior parts of leased premises and boundary marks of land in a reasonable state of repair. Tenants are also required to yield up the leased premises in the same condition they were in when the term of the lease began (subject to fair wear and tear). The parties can agree to further terms.
Frequency of Rent Payments
The law does not regulate the frequency of rent payments, which is contractually agreed by the parties.
The law does not regulate rent variation, except in the case of commercial leases governed by the LTA, which sets out elaborate notice requirements and allows the tenant to challenge the proposed variation before the Business Premises Rent Tribunal (BPRT). If the lease is silent on rent variation, this can only be done by agreement between the parties.
Rent is varied based on a pre-agreed escalation rate indicated in the lease. The frequency of escalation is also indicated in the lease.
VAT is payable on rental income from non-residential premises at a rate of 16%. Rental income earned from the lease of residential premises is exempted from VAT payment under Part II of the First Schedule of the VAT Act.
The tenant bears the following costs:
The maintenance and repair costs for common areas are paid by the landlord or the management company from the service charge paid by the tenants. These costs are apportioned amongst the tenants.
Tenants generally bear the cost of installing individual utility meters (water, electricity, etc) for the leased premises, and pay utility costs directly to the utility providers. For shared utilities, the landlord or management company will apportion the costs to the tenants, who will pay the landlord or management company in the form of service charges for onward payment to the utility providers.
The real estate taxes relating to rental property are:
Tenants are responsible for the stamp duty payable on the tenancy agreement, and landlords are responsible for payment of taxes on the rental income.
Resident persons (landlords) earning rental income between KES288,000 and KES15 million for the use or occupation of residential property during any year of income are liable to pay residential rental income tax at the statutory rate of 7.5% on the gross rental receipts as a final tax.
Resident persons outside the income threshold mentioned previously, including commercial landlords, are taxed under the ordinary income tax bands.
Rental income paid to non-resident persons, on the other hand, is subjected to WHT at a rate of 30%. This is deducted by the tenant at source and remitted to the KRA as a final tax.
In addition, landlords operating rental businesses are generally required to issue eTims-compliant electronic tax invoices. This is particularly relevant to tenants because business expenditure is not deductible for income tax purposes unless it is supported by a valid electronic tax invoice.
The landlord insures the building while the tenant insures the contents in the leased premises, including the assets of the tenant within the premises. The lease indicates the insured risks, which may include fire, burglary and natural disasters. In the post-pandemic market, standard commercial property and business interruption policies exclude losses arising from viruses or communicable diseases unless expressly endorsed.
The landlord may contractually restrict the use of the leased premises by a tenant if such restrictions are permitted by law. Furthermore, the law imposes user restrictions on tenants, with the Physical Planning Act and county legislation regulating the use and development of land in Kenya. These restrictions may be indicated on the title document. The LA also implies covenants on the use of leased premises by tenants.
Section 67 (2) (e) of the LA restricts tenants from developing the leased premises beyond what is permitted in the lease. The landlord’s consent would be required for restricted developments and is granted on the following conditions:
The LA applies to all leases, whether residential, industrial or commercial. The following categories of leases are governed by specific laws.
Controlled Tenancies Under the LTA
The LTA regulates controlled tenancies (see 6.3 Regulation of Rents or Lease Terms) over business premises to protect tenants from exploitation, including arbitrary rent revisions and illegal evictions.
Leases of Dwelling Houses Under the Rent Restriction Act (Rent Act)
The Rent Act regulates tenancies relating to dwelling houses of a standard rent of below KES2,500, to protect tenants from exploitation by landlords.
Leases Over Agricultural Land
The LCA regulates dealings in agricultural land, with the aim of advancing agricultural activities and restricting ownership by foreigners.
Under Section 73 (1) of the LA, the landlord has the right to terminate the lease if the tenant is declared bankrupt or goes into liquidation.
The tenant generally has no right to occupy the leased premises upon the expiry of the commercial lease, unless the lease provides otherwise or the landlord’s conduct gives rise to a further tenancy. To ensure that a tenant leaves on the agreed date, a landlord should ensure that the termination clauses are clearly drafted in the lease, serve any termination or non-renewal notices in good time, avoid conduct that may be treated as creating a fresh tenancy and avoid continuing to accept rent after expiry. If the tenant does not leave voluntarily, the landlord may evict the tenant; see 6.21 Forced Eviction.
The lease would typically prohibit the assignment of the lease or permit assignment subject to the landlord’s consent. If permitted, a tenant may assign its rights over all or part of the leased premises on the following conditions:
Section 73 of the LA allows the landlord to terminate a lease if the tenant:
The lease may also allow for early termination by the parties giving reasonable notice. Termination may also be permitted in the event of the occurrence of a force majeure event.
Controlled tenancies (see 6.3 Regulation of Rents or Lease Terms) may only be terminated in accordance with the LTA, which requires the other party’s consent to be obtained. The aggrieved party can challenge termination at the BPRT. In this case, termination of the lease will be subject to BPRT’s orders.
The termination of commercial leases can also be challenging, since these leases generally do not contain termination provisions so as to avoid creating controlled tenancies under the LTA. In these instances, termination is by agreement between the parties or by the issuance of reasonable notice, which depends on the circumstances of the case.
Short-term leases for two years or less without the option of renewal are not registrable. Long-term leases for more than two years are required to be registered under the LRA.
Leases are required to comply with the formalities of a valid contract. The lease will also be subject to stamp duty, charged at a rate of 2% of the average annual rent. The stamped lease is lodged at the relevant land registry for registration. An entry of the registered lease will be made on the title document and on the deed file of the property maintained by the land registry. The tenant meets the registration costs and the legal fees of its advocates and the landlord’s advocates.
Long-term leases of a period of 21 years and above, and which confer ownership, are deemed to be transfers of title. Accordingly, stamp duty is payable at 2% of the value of the leased premises if located in a rural area, or at 4% of the value of the leased premises if located in an urban area. Upon registration, a title is issued to the lessee, who bears the registration costs and the legal fees of its advocates and the landlord’s advocates.
Where a lease is lawfully terminated by a landlord as discussed in 6.19 Right to Terminate a Lease, or on expiry of the lease term, the landlord should first comply with the lease terms and applicable statutory termination or forfeiture requirements. If the tenant remains in occupation without consent, the landlord should seek vacant possession through the appropriate legal process rather than rely on forcible eviction. A landlord is required to obtain a court order to evict a tenant.
A tenant may apply to the ELC to challenge the eviction notice. For controlled tenancies, the tenant may challenge the eviction notice at the BPRT. In this case, eviction will be subject to the BPRT’s orders. For commercial leases, the tenant may challenge the eviction notice in courts of law. In this case, eviction will be subject to the court’s orders.
For leases in respect of dwelling houses of a standard rent below KES2,500, the tenant may challenge an eviction notice at the Rent Tribunal. In this case, eviction will be subject to the Tribunal’s orders.
A lease can be terminated by the government in cases of compulsory acquisition; see 2.9 Condemnation, Expropriation or Compulsory Purchase.
Restrictions on Damages
There are no statutory limitations on damages that a landlord may collect in the event of a tenant breach. However, under the common law rules governing the award of damages and case law, general damages are at the discretion of the trial court. For special damages, the landlord would have to prove actual losses that have been incurred in monetary terms as a direct result of the tenant’s breach.
Remedies
The remedies available to a landlord are contractually negotiated. Typically, the lease will provide for a security deposit that will be forfeited in the event of a default by the tenant.
The following statutes prescribe other remedies available to landlords in the event of a tenant breach.
The price of construction projects is determined by the procurement method. For government-related contracts, competitive bidding is generally required, so it is preferable for the price of the project to be fixed or capped. The price would typically include the construction costs and professional fees for the project team.
For negotiated contracts, there is more flexibility on pricing. The cost may be estimated but free of any cap. The parties may also enter a cost-reimbursable agreement, which would cushion a contractor if the construction costs exceeded the estimates.
The design and construction of a project may be allocated as follows.
Construction risk is largely managed as per the terms of the construction contract, which may provide for:
The parties may agree to a milestone-based construction schedule. The contract may provide for liquidated damages to be paid by the contractor in the event of inexcusable delays in attaining the milestones. In cases of inordinate inexcusable delays, the contract may also provide for termination at the discretion of the aggrieved parties.
Project owners may call for additional security to guarantee a contractor’s performance, including:
Unless restricted in the construction contract, an unpaid contractor has a builder’s lien over the constructed property so long as it maintains possession of the property. Financiers may require a contractor to sign a waiver of a builder’s lien. Notably, the Government Proceedings Act prohibits the exercising of liens over government property.
For a project to be inhabited, a certificate of practical completion must be issued by a qualified architect, and a certificate of occupation must be issued by the relevant county government.
The sale of commercial premises is subject to VAT, while the sale of land and residential premises is exempt from VAT. The VAT Act also exempts the transfer of business as a going concern. That exemption may be relevant when structuring a transaction involving sale of income-producing real estate.
Large real estate investors mitigate tax liability by:
The landlord or owner is obliged to pay land rates to the relevant county government if the premises are within an urban area. Tenants may contribute towards land rates by way of the payment of service charges.
WHT
Foreigners are subject to WHT, which is levied at different rates depending on the category of income earned. The rate also depends on whether the foreigner is a resident or a non-resident. WHT is 30% on rental income earned by a non-resident, 15% on dividend and interest income earned by a non-resident and 20% on professional fees earned by a non-resident.
WHT is deducted by the payer at source and remitted to the KRA. Interest earned from loans obtained from foreign sources for purposes of investing in the energy or water sectors, or in roads, ports, railways or aerodromes, is exempt from WHT pursuant to Legal Notice No 91 of 2015.
CGT
Gains from the disposal of real estate are subject to CGT; see 2.10 Taxes Applicable to a Transaction.
Rental Income Tax
Rental income tax is paid by residents earning annual rental income of between KES288,000 and KES15 million. The tax is charged monthly at a rate of 7.5% of gross rent received per month. No expenses or capital deductions are allowed to be deducted while calculating the tax.
This tax is not applicable to non-residents. Rental income earned by a non-resident is subject to WHT at a rate of 30% of the gross rental income received.
There are no specific tax benefits from owning land. However, the following expenditures are allowable deductions when determining a person’s taxable income:
REITs also enjoy the following tax exemptions.
IKM Place, Tower A, 1st Floor
5th Ngong Avenue
Off Bishops Road
Nairobi
Kenya
+254 20 2777 3000
info@ikm.dlapiperafrica.com www.dlapiperafrica.com/kenya
Off-Plan Property Transactions and Consumer Protection in Kenya
Introduction
Over the last decade, there has been a marked surge in real estate development across Nairobi and Kenya at large. The prospect of home ownership has become engrained as a matter of significant public discourse. This surge has been the result of co-ordinated efforts to respond to rapid urbanisation by expanding the housing supply.
This transformation already manifests in the city landscape. If one takes a walk through Westlands, Kilimani, Lavington or the expanding suburbs in the outskirts of Nairobi, the scenery is the same: towering cranes and colourful billboards promising “The Future of Living”. For many, these billboards represent the ultimate Kenyan dream: owning a modern apartment at a massive discount before the first brick is even laid. This is the world of off-plan investing.
The appeal of the off-plan model lies in its positioning as both a home-ownership pathway and an investment opportunity. Buyers are typically able to secure units at prices often up to 20% below prevailing market rates, with flexible, phased payment structures that make entry more accessible. More importantly, developers frequently market these projects on the promise of capital appreciation, suggesting that by the time construction is complete, the property’s value will have risen beyond its initial purchase price. This creates a perceived early-mover advantage, where those who commit before construction stand to benefit from both discounted entry and anticipated market gains.
The implementation of off plan-type sales effectively deals with another issue specific to the Kenyan market: the demand for housing being correlated with the price of ready-made units. The biggest target market for these houses, the middle income earners, are not able to afford ready-made units, unless they have some form of financing from banks or other financing institutions. When looking at affordability in terms of pricing, the income level of the average Kenyan is a strong signifier of the uptake of off-plan investing. A payment model that allows for payment of a small deposit, then phased payments afterwards, is sure to have widespread appeal.
At the same time, this model is not without risk. Purchasing off-plan means committing funds towards a product that exists largely conceptually, only being anchored in architectural renderings and contractual assurances. In addition, most developers utilise the money paid by prospective buyers to effectively finance the development itself.
The Current Legal Landscape: What Protects Buyers Today?
The Sectional Properties Act, 2020 – a transformative framework
The most important legal development for buyers of apartments and other multi-unit developments is the Sectional Properties Act, 2020, read together with the Sectional Properties Regulations, 2021. These instruments represent a fundamental shift from the old regime under the repealed Sectional Properties Act, 1987 and the sublease system that previously dominated the market.
Under the old system, developers retained significant long-term control through the head titles and management companies they controlled, plans were often inconsistent and lacked proper geo-referencing, disclosure to buyers was weak and there were no standardised governance rules for common property. The 2020 Act and 2021 Regulations have corrected these deficiencies in several critical ways.
Collectively, these provisions deliver greater security of title, remove developer dominance after completion, standardise management and enhance transparency for off-plan purchasers. However, one notable implementation gap remains: the Act mandates the conversion of all existing long-term subleases into sectional titles based on approved geo-referenced plans. Many unit owners and management companies are still unaware of this requirement or have not yet complied, meaning the full benefits of the new regime have not yet reached all stakeholders of various developments across the country.
General Consumer Protection Under the 2012 Act
Buyers also benefit from the Consumer Protection Act, 2012, which prohibits misleading advertising, unfair contract terms and false representations. It gives consumers the right to accurate information about the product or service and provides remedies where developers fail to deliver as promised. In the context of off-plan sales, this can cover issues such as inaccurate brochures, hidden charges or unreasonable forfeiture clauses. While helpful, this is a general statute and does not contain the specific tools required for complex, multi-year off-plan transactions such as:
In practice, buyers remain heavily reliant on the strength of their individual sale agreements and the integrity of the developer.
Judicial protection – evidence from the courts
Kenyan courts have shown a clear willingness to protect buyers when developers breach their obligations. In the 2021 case of Nizarali Pradhan Sumar & Another v VK Construction Limited, the court awarded a full refund of the purchase price, reimbursement of repair costs, and compensation for lost rental income after the developer failed to deliver units of the promised quality and standard.
This decision reassures investors that judicial recourse is available and that courts will not hesitate to hold developers accountable for material breaches. Similar outcomes have been seen in other disputes involving delayed completion or substandard finishes. That said, litigation is time-consuming, expensive and emotionally draining, which is why stronger preventive regulation remains essential. Investors should view court protection as a last resort rather than a primary safeguard.
Defining features and legal characterisation of off-plan contracts
In an off-plan sale, the contract is executory, and its performance depends on future events. As Dr Naar Fatiha observes in her article “The Specificity of the Off-plan Sales Contract”, the defining feature is that “the object of the contract does not exist when the contract is concluded, but it is possible to exist in the future”.
Algerian Law No 11-04 of 2011 aptly describes such contracts as agreements for the sale of a building “on designs or in the process of completion”, where the developer transfers land and building rights progressively as construction advances, while the buyer pays in instalments tied to progress.
This structure creates distinct obligations: the developer must build, while the buyer pays in phases. Possession is typically granted upon substantial payment or full settlement, with final completion documents including the certificate of lease issued only when the unit matches the approved plans and all regulatory requirements are met. The completion date is therefore the most critical clause in any off-plan agreement.
An off-plan contract is simultaneously a contract of service obligating the developer to build the unit for the purchaser and a contract of transfer of property. Given this hybrid nature and the buyer’s vulnerability, the legal framework must impose heightened obligations on the developer and provide robust protections for purchasers.
Modern off-plan sale agreements frequently include arbitration clauses. These provisions confer significant protection for investors by offering faster, more cost-effective dispute resolution than court proceedings. Arbitrators with specialist knowledge in real estate and construction can deliver informed decisions, while awards are final, binding and readily enforceable both locally and internationally. This mechanism provides buyers with greater certainty and efficiency when pursuing remedies for delays, defects or non-performance.
Legal Risks Investors Must Understand
Unregulated developers
Unlike many developed markets, Kenya places few restrictions on who may launch off-plan real estate projects, allowing a wide range of players to undertake off-plan developments. Anyone can initiate a project once they secure land either through an outright purchase or a joint venture with a landowner, and obtain various regulatory approvals such as change of user, architectural and structural plans, and National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) environmental clearance. There are no mandatory minimum capital requirements, proven track records or independent financial vetting by a regulatory body.
This low threshold has allowed undercapitalised or inexperienced developers to enter the market, increasing the likelihood of project failure, delays or abandonment. Joint ventures can further obscure accountability, as the developer may be a special-purpose vehicle with limited assets. For investors, this means thorough due diligence on the developer’s financial standing and previous project delivery record is essential before committing any funds.
Delays, abandonment, fund diversion and structural failures
This remains the single biggest deterrent for prospective off-plan buyers. When developers receive substantial deposits but fail to secure a sufficient number of off-takers or encounter unexpected cash-flow problems, funds are sometimes diverted to other projects, operational expenses or even unrelated ventures. The result is prolonged delays often stretching well beyond the contracted completion period or complete abandonment.
Contracts typically include penalty clauses or interest on late handover, but enforcing these against financially distressed or insolvent developers is often impractical. In extreme cases, desperate cost-cutting or failure to adhere to regulatory and construction standards has led to structural failures and building collapses, resulting in total loss for buyers who have already paid significant sums. The fear of whether a project may be completed and investment security concerns continue to discourage many potential investors from entering the off-plan market, despite the attractive pricing.
The payment structure trap – locked-in buyers
Most off-plan sale agreements tie payment instalments to rigid calendar dates or arbitrary timelines rather than actual, verifiable construction progress. Buyers are contractually obliged to continue making instalments even when the project is visibly stalled or progressing far slower than anticipated, with limited or no contractual right to suspend payments or exit early without forfeiting substantial deposits.
A completion clause offers little practical protection. This mismatch between payment obligations and real project progress leaves buyers locked in, continuing to fund developments that may never reach completion. It is one of the most unfair and frustrating aspects of current market practice and directly contributes to the loss of investor confidence. Reforming payment structures to align with independent milestone certifications would fundamentally rebalance risk between developers and buyers.
Practical Reforms for Enhanced Buyer Protection
Drawing on international best practice, particularly the successful models in Dubai (Real Estate Regulatory Agency – RERA) and Algeria, and the specific challenges observed daily by practitioners in Kenya, the firm proposes a focused set of reforms that would significantly strengthen buyer protection while maintaining an entrepreneurial development sector. These reforms directly address the risks outlined above.
Pre-marketing licensing and developer vetting
In July 2020, a committee appointed by the principal secretary of the State Department for Housing and Urban Development recommended the establishment of the Real Estate Developers Regulatory Board (REDRB). The key mandates of this board include
The establishment of the board is a step in the right direction, especially in the wake of a booming property market, amid increasing cases of fraudulent market players.
Additionally, developers should be prohibited from marketing or selling off-plan units as proposed in the Real Estate Regulation Bill, 2023, until they obtain a formal marketing licence. Licensing should require proof of secure land title or a valid joint-venture consent with landowner approval, approved architectural and structural plans, minimum financial capacity or bank guarantees and a credible project timeline with a clear milestone schedule. Marketing materials should be filed with the REDRB and become enforceable documents. This would finally impose meaningful barriers to entry, eliminate phantom projects and misleading brochures, and give investors’ confidence that only credible, capable developers can solicit their funds.
Mandatory escrow accounts with milestone-based payments
All purchaser funds should be held in a ring-fenced, project-specific escrow account managed by an independent trustee or escrow agent approved by the REDRB. Funds should only be released upon independent professional certification by a registered quantity surveyor or architect that defined construction milestones have been met (eg, completion of substructure, reinforced concrete frame, roofing and internal finishes).
Buyers should have the explicit contractual right to suspend further payments and, after a reasonable cure period, to terminate the agreement and recover their deposits with interest if milestones are not met within agreed timeframes. This single reform would directly address both fund diversion and the payment-structure trap, giving buyers real leverage and protection throughout the construction process.
Defects safety net, retention and mandatory insurance
A 5% retention from the total purchase price should be held in escrow for 6–12 months after practical completion as a performance bond; if structural defects or poor workmanship appear, there is an immediate pool of funds available to effect repairs if the developer fails to act. In addition, developers, contractors and architects should be required to maintain mandatory ten-year structural defect liability insurance, with buyers named as beneficiaries. These measures would provide both immediate recourse for workmanship issues and long-term protection against major defects or collapses, significantly reducing the risk of total loss.
Specialised Real Estate Dispute Tribunal
A dedicated Real Estate Dispute Tribunal should be established with powers to:
This would provide a fast, low-cost and specialist alternative to the High Court, restoring investor confidence that disputes can be resolved efficiently without years of costly litigation. The Tribunal should also have jurisdiction to enforce milestone certifications and direct refunds from escrow accounts.
Additional supporting measures
The firm further recommends the creation of a buyer protection guarantee fund, capitalised through a small (1–2%) levy on all off-plan sales, to provide emergency compensation in cases of developer insolvency, abandonment or structural collapse.
Standard-form sale agreements incorporating milestone payments, buyer exit rights and clear disclosure requirements should be prescribed by regulation, reducing the ability of developers to impose one-sided terms.
Finally, a co-ordinated national programme involving the Ministry of Lands and relevant professional bodies to accelerate conversion of sublease developments under the 2020 Act would ensure that all unit owners, not just those in new projects, enjoy the full protections of the modern regime.
The Future Outlook for Off-Plan Investments in Kenya
The outlook for off-plan investment in Kenya is positive and full of potential, provided the regulatory reforms outlined above are prioritised and implemented with urgency. With the housing deficit still hovering around 2 million units and urbanisation continuing at approximately 4.3% annually, demand for quality, transparently managed housing remains strong and largely unmet.
Full operationalisation of mandatory escrow with milestone triggers, developer licensing and vetting, a fast-track tribunal and a buyer protection fund would move the sector from high-risk, high-reward to a genuinely investable asset class for a much wider pool of capital, including:
In the meantime, investors should exercise heightened due diligence and treat off-plan purchases with the same rigour as any other significant investment. Key questions to ask any developer before signing include:
Additionally, engaging an experienced property lawyer to review the sale agreement, conduct due diligence and negotiate protective clauses before signing remains the single most important protective step any buyer can take. The cost of proper legal advice upfront is minimal compared with the potential loss of a lifetime’s savings.
Developers who embrace transparency, milestone-based payments, independent escrow and third-party oversight will be best positioned to attract capital, complete successful projects and build long-term reputations. Those who continue with opaque practices, rigid payment schedules and limited accountability risk losing market share as investor awareness and regulatory expectations rise. The market is maturing, and the developers who adapt will thrive.
Conclusion
Off-plan property sales in Kenya sit at a critical and exciting juncture. The Sectional Properties Act, 2020 has already delivered meaningful post-completion protections through automatic owner-controlled management corporations and geo-referenced certificate of lease titles. Judicial decisions such as the Sumar case demonstrate that Kenyan courts will uphold buyer rights when developers breach their contractual obligations. The Consumer Protection Act, 2012 provides an additional layer of general safeguards against misleading practices.
Yet significant gaps remain, particularly in the pre-construction and construction phases, where most investor risk is concentrated. Unregulated developer entry, fund diversion, rigid payment structures and the slow pace of lease conversions continue to expose buyers to unnecessary and avoidable risk.
However, the outlook for off-plan development in Kenya is exceptionally bright, provided the transition to formal regulation remains a priority. With a housing deficit still hovering around 2 million units and urbanisation accelerating at 4.3% annually, the demand for quality, transparently managed housing is insatiable. The firm anticipates that the full operationalisation of the laws and proposed laws in place will move the market towards safe-haven status, attracting both institutional capital and a surge in diaspora investment. As the Nairobi skyline continues its ambitious ascent, the success of the sector will ultimately depend on this delicate balance, maintaining the entrepreneurial energy of developers while ensuring the law remains the ultimate shield for the buyer.
Pitman House,
1st Floor
Jakaya Kikwete Road
PO Box 20617-00100
Nairobi
Kenya
+254 20 646 6000
info@garaneadvocates.com www.garanesomaneadvocates.com