Technology M&A 2024

Last Updated November 03, 2023

China

Law and Practice

Authors



Han Kun Law Offices has been widely recognised throughout the years as a leader in complex cross-border and domestic transactions. The firm’s main practice areas include private equity, M&A, international and domestic capital markets, investment funds, asset management, compliance, banking and finance, aviation finance, foreign direct investment, antitrust/competition, data protection, private client/wealth management, IP, bankruptcy and restructuring and dispute resolution. Han Kun has nearly 800 professionals located in its offices in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hong Kong, Haikou and Wuhan – as well as in Singapore, a leading financial centre in the Asia-Pacific. All the firm’s lawyers are graduates of top universities and have extensive experience in complex cross-border transactions and dispute resolution as counsel to both Chinese and foreign clients.

The M&A market in China’s technology sector has been more active in 2023 than it was in 2022. This heightened activity has been influenced to some extent by the active international M&A market. However, it has been even more shaped by the change in China’s COVID-19 policies, government encouragement of capital market operations, and the industry revolution sparked by the AI wave.

The pace of deal activity in China during the past 12 months has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, inflationary trends, changes in the financing market, and geopolitical factors such as the tensions between China and the USA. Despite these challenges, there have been numerous M&A cases in the AI sector – thanks to the Chinese government’s shift away from COVID-19 zero-tolerance policies, its support for capital market operations, and the AI boom driven by ChatGPT. One such example is Meituan’s acquisition of AI start-up Guang Nian Zhi Wai.

The regulation of AI was a key trend in China in 2023. Generative AI services are subject to dedicated AI and algorithm regulations, as well as general applicable regulations on content safety, data privacy and security, consumer protection, etc, in China.

In response to the popularity of generative AI services such as ChatGPT and Midjourney (and their Chinese counterparts), the CAC issued the Interim Measures for Generative Artificial Intelligence Services (the “Interim Measures”) in July 2023. Generative AI may also be governed by the regulations on “deep fake” services and algorithm-based information services. The latter mainly include algorithm-based services for content generation and synthesis, personalised pushing, sorting and selection, search and filtering, dispatch and decision-making, etc.

China is promulgating its first dedicated and comprehensive law on AI, which has been listed in the 2023 legislative agenda of the State Council.

New start-up companies are typically advised to incorporate in China. However, if entrepreneurs intend to seek an overseas listing in the future, they may be advised to incorporate or restructure into an offshore holding company (principally in the Cayman Islands).

China has relaxed its incorporation requirements throughout the years, to the extent that it now usually takes:

  • one or two weeks to incorporate a purely domestic company; and
  • one or two months to incorporate a foreign-invested company.

Generally, there is no initial paid-in capital requirement for a company incorporation unless the company will be engaging in certain specified business activities.

New start-up companies are typically advised to incorporate in China as limited liability companies. The partnership form is usually chosen for the purpose of setting up an investment fund or holding vehicle.

Entrepreneurs and many venture capital firms typically provide early-stage financing to a start-up company. If the funds are provided by venture capital firms, simplified investment agreements will be entered into to set forth the usual preferred rights for venture capital firms.

Typical sources of venture capital in China include funds of funds, wealthy entrepreneurs, government-sponsored funds, and large corporations. Both local and foreign venture capital firms are active in China. Government-sponsored funds have also been quite active recently.

There are well-developed standards for venture capital documentation in China, including for deal terms. Since 2017, Han Kun Law Offices has issued an annual Venture Capital/Private Equity Deal Data Analysis Report, which recaps the most common terms in venture capital/private equity deals in China each year and has become the market standard in this field.

Start-ups are generally advised to restructure their corporate forms from an onshore structure to an offshore structure if they intend to list overseas (and vice versa). Also, in the case of domestic listings, Chinese law provides that only joint stock companies can be publicly listed. Therefore, start-ups that intend to list in mainland China (A-share listing) or in Hong Kong (H-share listing) must change their corporate form from a limited liability company to a joint stock company.

Start-up investors tend to look for a liquidity event after the start-up has been in operation for more than five or six years. In the past, investors preferred IPOs to a trade sale. However, they currently appear to be more flexible when it comes to exit options and, depending on the specific terms of the transaction, are open to either an IPO or a trade sale.

In general, Chinese companies choose to list domestically rather than overseas – although Chinese companies in TMT industries prefer listing overseas, based on a variety of factors. Among other things, companies need to consider:

  • whether the proposed exchange will give a higher valuation and provide more liquidity after listing (eg, companies in TMT industries prefer listing overseas, whereas those in traditional industries prefer domestic listings);
  • whether the company fulfils the listing requirements of the proposed exchange (eg, A-share listing requirements tend to be stricter than those for overseas listing);
  • whether the company needs to restructure in order to list and whether this would be prohibitive in terms of time and cost; and
  • whether the company needs to go through certain procedures required by Chinese authorities in order to be listed overseas ‒ for example, filing with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) is required if a PRC-based company intends to list on a foreign exchange, and consent from the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) may be required additionally if it has more than a million users’ data.

If the company chooses to list on an overseas exchange (ie, neither A-share nor H-share), it must conduct its business through an offshore structure. Use of an offshore structure may:

  • complicate a future sale if the buyer is a purely domestic company; and
  • give rise to other implications, such as cross-border tax issues and scrutiny by multiple jurisdictions.

If the sale of a company is chosen as a liquidity event, the sale process is more likely to be run as a bilateral negotiation with a chosen buyer than as an auction. An auction sale is more common if it is a cross-border deal.

The typical transaction structure in China is either to:

  • buy the entire company; or
  • buy a controlling interest (eg, where the offeror buys out the venture capital funds but requests that the management or entrepreneurs retain a portion of their shares after the sale in order to ensure a smooth transition period).

Most M&A transactions in China are conducted as a sale of the entire company for a combination of stock and cash, particularly in the TMT sector.

Founders are usually expected to stand behind representations and warranties and certain liabilities after closing. Venture capital investors are generally expected to stand behind limited representations, warranties and liabilities only in respect of themselves. An escrow/holdback (ranging from 10–30% of the consideration) is customary for these purposes. Representations and warranties insurance is not customary in China.

Spin-offs are customary in the technology industry in China.

Key drivers for considering a spin-off include:

  • the spun-off business may perform better after the spin-off;
  • the spun-off business no longer fits with the parent business; and
  • the spun-off business may have a better chance of raising funds and listing independently.

Chinese tax law allows spin-offs to be conducted in a tax-deferred manner ‒ that is, the spin-off price is set at net book value instead of fair market value. Certain criteria must be met, such as

  • the shareholding structure must remain unchanged;
  • the spun-off entities’ business operations must remain unchanged; and
  • cash payments may be no more than 15% of the total transaction consideration.

Chinese law allows spin-offs to be immediately followed by a business combination. There are no specific requirements for this.

Spin-offs typically take between several months and one or two years to complete, depending on how the spin-off is structured. There is no need to seek tax authority pre-approval for spin-off arrangements. However, in practice, it is recommended that the arrangements are discussed with a competent tax authority before the transaction is executed ‒ particularly in the case of large-volume restructurings. Such discussions may take one or two months.

It is customary for buyers in China to acquire stakes in listed companies before making an offer to acquire; stakes are often built through negotiated transfers or by other means. Acquisitions of listed technology companies are predominantly conducted by way of transfer agreements and supplemented by a tender offer or other arrangement.

Reporting Thresholds

Buyers are obliged to report their stake in a listed company within three trading days once the stake reaches 5% of the shares of the listed company (eg, upon acquiring shares on the open market or after the execution of a transfer agreement). Buyers must thereafter report each additional 5% increase or decrease in ownership in accordance with the same three-day time limit. Additionally, once the buyer acquires a 5% stake in the target listed company, the buyer must notify the target of every 1% increase or decrease in shareholding on the trading day following the occurrence of such change. The target listed company will then publicly announce the buyer’s change in shareholding.

Disclosure Thresholds

Buyers are not allowed to trade shares in the listed company prior to submission of the above-mentioned reports and the making of an announcement. In addition, when making these reports, each buyer must disclose the purpose of its acquiring a stake in the target listed company and whether it intends to continue its stakebuilding within the next 12 months. If the buyer has acquired 20% or more of the shares in the target, it must also disclose its future plans for the listed company, including whether it intends to adjust the company’s business, organisation and structure, personnel arrangements, and other matters. The buyer may not deviate from any disclosed plans and commitments in its subsequent actions.

Lock-Up Period

Buyers who acquire a listed company are not allowed to transfer the acquired listed company’s shares within 18 months of completing the acquisition. (If the buyer is an offshore investor, the restriction period is three years.) However, transfers between different entities controlled by the same overall controller are not restricted.

A buyer must make a tender offer to all shareholders of a listed company once its stake in the company reaches 30% if it intends to continue increasing its shareholdings, according to the provisions of the relevant administrative measures. This is also called a mandatory offer.

It is worth noting that a tender offer to acquire all the shares held must be made to all the shareholders of the company if:

  • the acquisition will cause shares owned by the buyer to exceed 30% (eg, from 26% to 31%); and
  • the buyer intends to acquire listed company shares other than by way of a tender offer, such as:
    1. acquisition through a negotiated transfer agreement from a specific seller; or
    2. indirect acquisition of an entity that holds certain shares of the listed company.

Exceptions exist for certain cases in which the buyer satisfies special conditions, such as:

  • transfers between entities under the same control; or
  • where the 30% shareholding threshold is passively exceeded as a result of the listed company’s targeted share buybacks.

As previously discussed in 6.1 Stakebuilding, acquisitions of listed companies in China are principally conducted by way of transfer agreements (direct or indirect) and supplemented by other means, such as:

  • by subscription to shares issued by the listed company via private placement;
  • tender offers;
  • purchasing shares via stock exchange trading systems;
  • becoming the actual controlling party by way of an investment relationship; or
  • agreement or other arrangement (eg, by accepting proxy voting rights or agreeing to carry out concerted actions with other parties).

Acquisition by Merger

Acquisitions of listed companies may also be completed by merger; however, such transactions are rare in China. Mergers in this context are uncommon because the CSRC and the relevant exchange must pre-approve operational matters, which usually include:

  • the buyer applying for an IPO on the A-share market (where the buyer is an unlisted domestic company);
  • the buyer issuing shares (where the buyer is a listed company); and
  • stock-for-stock mergers.

The approval process is complicated and more restrictive, as it requires compliance with a number of laws and regulations concerning listing and restructuring.

Consideration and Payment Methods

Public company acquisitions in the technology industry tend to be structured as cash transactions, rather than stock-for-stock, a combination of cash and stock, or other legal methods. Cash is favoured in these acquisitions because securities (including stocks) used as consideration must meet certain requirements – for example, that the shares can be traded conveniently and have a reasonable valuation ‒ and tender offers require three years of annual audit reports and a securities valuation report.

The cash option must be provided where the securities are not listed on a stock exchange. It should be noted that, in some cases, cash consideration is mandatory or may be offered. Cash consideration is mandatory if the buyer is required to issue a tender offer for all the shares either:

  • in order to terminate the company’s listed status; or
  • owing to a failure to satisfy the exemption conditions for a tender offer.

Additionally, as mentioned earlier, a cash option should be provided to the counterparty if the buyer can also provide a cash option in which it pays with securities other than the shares of a non-listed company as the consideration.

Minimum Price Requirements

Acquisitions and business combinations in China are subject to minimum price requirements, which vary according to how the transaction is structured.

Agreements and tender offers

The minimum pricing in an acquisition by agreement must not be lower than 80% or 90% (depending on the listed market) of the closing price of the listed company on the trading day preceding the execution of the agreement. For tender offers, the minimum price must be no less than the highest price paid by the buyer within six months prior to the date on which the tender offer is announced. In practice, this price is generally not lower than the arithmetic average of the daily weighted average price for the 30 trading days prior to the date of announcement.

Stock-for-stock mergers

The pricing of stock-for-stock merger transactions must not be lower than 80% of any of the following: the average trading price of the company’s shares for the past 20, 60 or 120 trading days prior to the announcement of the listed company’s board resolution concerning the merger transaction. (There is usually some premium based on the listed company’s share price average for the previous 20 trading days.)

Use of contingent value rights

Buyers and sellers generally do not agree on mechanisms to adjust transaction consideration because the Chinese securities regulators impose a minimum price requirement for the acquisition of listed companies and regulate the overall arrangements for such transactions. However, in some cases, the parties will agree on performance commitments for the listed company through commercial negotiations. In such cases, the exiting controlling shareholder or the actual controlling party in the listed company may:

  • attempt to achieve certain performance commitments within a certain period of time; and
  • compensate the buyer accordingly if the company fails to achieve these performance commitments.

In order to make mandatory offers, the buyer usually chooses to establish minimum acceptance conditions (in accordance with the provisions of the relevant administrative measures), which will be discussed in 6.7 Minimum Acceptance Conditions. However, when a buyer makes a voluntary tender offer, it usually sets up some other conditions (related to the acquisition price and ratio) in order to acquire shares.

Generally, the buyer prefers to offer a relatively high price based on the expectations of the listed company’s existing shareholders. If a voluntary tender offer is made to obtain control of a listed company, then the agreement usually sets forth a certain percentage of pre-offer shares as a condition precedent to the execution of the offer.

Chinese securities regulators implement restrictions with regard to the ratio (percentage of shares to be acquired) and price. However, this is limited only to achieving minimums (rather than maximums).

Voluntary tender offers are rare in comparison with mandatory tender offers triggered by a 30% shareholding threshold (see 6.2 Mandatory Offer). The circumstances under which voluntary tender offers occur are generally:

  • where the controlling shareholder(s) of the listed company is looking to increase control; 
  • where “white knight” investors bail out a listed company that is in trouble or stabilise the company’s share price; or 
  • where the voluntary tender offer supplements the acquisition of shares by other means.

It is customary in China for the parties to enter into a transaction agreement in connection with the acquisition of a listed company’s control rights through a transfer agreement or merger. However, for tender offers, it is not customary to enter into an agreement with the listed company or the seller; instead, the buyer usually puts forward a tender offer that is then accepted by the original shareholders.

When acquiring a listed company by agreement, the parties may agree in the transaction agreement on certain obligations that the listed company is to undertake. These obligations usually include:

  • relevant representations and warranties undertaken by the listed company with regard to its production and operating status; 
  • setting the completion of certain tasks by the listed company as a condition precedent in closing or post-closing requirements; 
  • requiring that the listed company operates in its ordinary course of business during the transition period; and
  • requiring co-operation from the listed company with regard to the closing and the buyer’s arrangements for its future production and operation, corporate governance, employment and personnel, etc.

The minimum acquisition threshold for acquiring a listed company by tender offer is based on a combination of factors, such as the concentration of the shareholding structure of the listed company, the buyer’s purpose in making the acquisition, the capital status of the buyer, and the cost of the acquisition. However, regardless of these factors, the following minimum requirements must be satisfied.

  • The percentage of acquired shares must be no less than 5% (no less than 10% if the buyer is a foreign investor). If the buyer intends to assume actual control of the listed company, the buyer will usually end up being the largest shareholder and the buyer’s voting share will be significantly larger (usually over 10% more) than that of the second-largest shareholder.
  • The price of acquired shares must be no less than the minimum price according to the provisions of the relevant administrative measures (see 6.4 Consideration and Minimum Price).
  • There is no mortgage, pledge, freezing, judicial seizure or any other form of encumbrance of rights in respect of the shares and the shares are not in the lock-up period.

The period of a tender offer may be no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days. The buyer is not allowed to modify the offer within the 15 days preceding the expiry of the offer period nor allowed to revoke the offer during the offer period. Apart from this, there are usually no strict requirements about the time limitation for other takeover offers.

Chinese law does not provide for squeeze-out mechanisms or ownership thresholds whereby, following a successful tender offer, a buyer can buy out the shareholders who have not tendered. Upon completion of the tender offer, the remaining shareholders who refused to tender their shares are entitled to continue as shareholders of the company.

When acquiring a listed company, if the buyer intends to make the acquisition in cash, “certain funds” are required to launch the offer in China. If the buyer has sufficient funds to implement the bid, the buyer also needs to disclose the source of its funds and submit relevant documents to prove that the funds are sufficient and legitimate. The Chinese securities regulators will usually focus on the buyer’s ability to perform contractual obligations and the source of its funds. Generally, the buyer’s funds must not stem from the listed company, the seller or its affiliates. In any case, the buyer itself should make the offer.

Buyers are also permitted to use bank loans or borrowings; however, the procurement of such bank loans or borrowings cannot be a prerequisite for the acquisition. Additionally, if there is a possibility that the buyer will not be able to obtain the corresponding loans or borrowings, it is required to propose a plan to replenish or secure the funds.

When acquiring a listed company, the buyer and the target company (or its selling shareholders) may negotiate certain deal protection measures. These measures include:

  • break-up fees;
  • exclusivity clauses;
  • co-operation with the due diligence to be conducted by the buyer to its satisfaction; and
  • an advance pledge of partial shares to the buyer.

In an acquisition via transfer agreement, the selling shareholders usually assume the corresponding obligations. The target company usually assumes these obligations in a merger transaction, however.

A successful bidder that obtains less than full ownership of a public target company may find it difficult to obtain additional governance rights. The circumstances differ depending upon whether the target company remains publicly listed or becomes private.

Company Remains Public

Target companies that remain public are subject to A-share regulatory independence requirements and buyers are often unable to obtain additional rights beyond those entitled to them by their shareholdings. To enhance control, buyers may negotiate with other shareholders of the target company in order to agree on certain governance arrangements.

Company Becomes Private

If a target company becomes private, the buyers may negotiate with other shareholders of the target company to agree on certain governance arrangements (such as profit-sharing). Subject to the provisions on joint stock companies, however, the same shares have the same rights; therefore, the buyer may be unable to obtain more voting rights than the number of shares they hold. In such cases, the target company could be restructured into a limited liability company after it becomes private in order to obtain additional rights; however, this may also require consent from the other shareholders that hold two-thirds or more of the voting rights.

In order to reduce uncertainty, it is customary in China for buyers to seek to obtain irrevocable commitments from the principal shareholders of the target company to tender or support the transaction. The parties usually execute a term sheet in order to reach consensus on essential terms. The principal shareholder is usually required to perform certain co-operative obligations and may not transfer or negotiate with another third party (eg, a competitor) with regard to the transfer of shares in a specified period. Principal shareholders who agree to the term sheet generally comply with the commitments, unless they are willing to assume liability for breach of contract.

Takeover and tender offers may be subject to approval, depending on how the proposed transaction is structured.

Acquisitions by Merger

The CSRC and the stock exchange must pre-approve acquisitions by merger, as discussed in 6.3 Transaction Structures. Under current policy, this review period is no less than six months. Additionally, the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM)’s approval is required if the buyer in a stock-for-stock acquisition is a foreign investor (although this is extremely difficult to arrange in practice).

Acquisitions by Tender Offer

In an acquisition of a listed company by way of tender offer or transfer by agreement, pre-approval from the Chinese securities regulators or the stock exchanges is not required. However, the relevant agreements and announcements will be disclosed and may be reviewed and scrutinised by the stock exchanges during the transaction. Pre-approval from MOFCOM will be required if the buyer is a foreign investor, whatever the method of acquisition.

Approval of Offer Terms

The CSRC and the stock exchange do not usually pre-review other offer terms (eg, timing and price), provided that the offer is in compliance with the relevant Chinese laws and regulations concerning the acquisition of listed companies, which are outlined in 6.5 Common Conditions for a Takeover Offer/Tender Offer.

Timeline

The buyer is entitled to establish the timeline for the offer free from regulatory supervision, provided that the offer is valid for no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days. The offer period can be extended by more than 15 days if a competitive offer is announced and the buyer modifies the offer less than 15 days before the expiry of the original offer period. However, the offer period may not be extended later than the expiry of the other competitive offer.

As previously discussed in 6.13 Securities Regulator’s or Stock Exchange Process, the acquisition period for a tender offer:

  • must be no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days; and
  • may be extended (but not reduced) after the offer is made.

Such extensions do not generally exceed 60 days unless there is a competitive offer. There are usually no strict requirements concerning the time limitation for the other takeover offer.

As discussed before, pre-approval from the Chinese securities regulators or the stock exchanges is not required in a tender offer or transfer by agreement. If additional pre-approval from the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) and (if the buyer is a foreign investor) MOFCOM is necessary for an acquisition, this is usually set as a condition precedent to the offer and its closing where the M&A transaction of a listed company requires such. Regulatory approvals should be obtained following the announcement of the offer and before the offer is officially made or the agreement becomes effective. Therefore, the offer period is not affected by regulatory pre-approvals.

Setting up a new company in certain sectors of the technology industry in China is subject to specific regulations. Value-added telecommunications operators must obtain a value-added telecommunications business licence from the authorised telecommunications administration bureau, for example, which may take several months depending on the specific scope of the licence. Online game operators must obtain an online publishing permit from the competent publication authority, which may also take several months in practice.

The CSRC and the relevant PRC stock exchanges are the primary regulators for M&A transactions in China’s public securities markets.

Foreign investment is generally welcome and permitted in China. Foreign direct investment filings, which are mandatory under Chinese law, are straightforward and easy to complete.

Additional requirements or restrictions may apply if the foreign investment is to be made in certain industries. These are set forth in the Special Administrative Measures (Negative List) for Foreign Investment Access, which is amended from time to time.

National Security Review

China’s new national security review process, which was reformed by the Measures for Security Review of Foreign Investment, came into effect on 18 January 2021. The measures provide for a systematic review process for foreign investment from a national security perspective.

Forms and scope 

All forms of foreign investment are covered, including:

  • Sino-foreign equity joint ventures established through M&A;
  • newly established wholly foreign-owned enterprises or projects; and
  • other forms of investment (including foreign-to-foreign transactions in which the target has Chinese subsidiaries).

The scope of national security is also expanded to cover industries involving the military and military support, important agricultural products, important energy and resources, major equipment manufacturing, important infrastructure, important transportation services, important cultural products and services, important IT and internet products and services, important financial services, critical technologies and other important sectors related to national security.

Export Control

China’s Export Control Law, which unified the framework for China’s export control regime, took effect on 1 December 2020.

Controlled items

The Export Control Law applies to the export of “controlled items”, which are defined as “dual-use (both civil use and military use) products, military products, nuclear materials and other products, technologies and services relating to the protection of national security, national interest or the fulfilment of anti-proliferation and other international obligations”.

Licences

Those who wish to export controlled items are required to obtain a licence from the enforcement authority. Moreover, a licence may be required for the export of goods that fall outside the list of controlled items but nonetheless could:

  • endanger national security or national interest;
  • be used to design, develop, manufacture or facilitate weapons of mass destruction or their vehicles; or
  • be used for terrorist purposes.

End users and end use

Exporters must provide certificates for the end user and end use of controlled items. The certificates must be issued by the end user or the government authorities in the country or region where the end user is located. The end user must promise not to:

  • change the end use of the controlled items; or
  • transfer them to any third party.

Those importers and end users will be put on a blacklist and prohibited from dealing with Chinese exporters if they:

  • breach these requirements;
  • endanger national security or national interest; or
  • use controlled items for terrorist purposes.

In addition, China also recently enacted other laws and departmental rules that play an important role in establishing China’s export control and international trade regime, including the Law on Countering Foreign Sanctions, the Provisions on Unreliable Entities List, and the Rules on Counteracting Unjustified Extraterritorial Application of Foreign Legislation and Other Measures.

M&A and business combinations are subject to antitrust filing obligations according to China’s Anti-Monopoly Law (AML). If a transaction leads to a concentration of undertakings that reaches specific thresholds, it must be notified to the SAMR for antitrust review.

China’s new AML came into effect on 1 August 2022. It raises the maximum fine applicable to gun-jumping to:

  • no more than 10% of the turnover of the filing obligor(s) in the preceding fiscal year if the concentration has or may eliminate or restrict competition; and
  • no more than RMB5 million if the concentration does not have such effect.

Concentrations of Undertakings

The AML defines “concentration of undertakings” as:

  • a merger of undertakings; 
  • an undertaking acquiring control of another undertaking by means of equity or asset acquisition; or 
  • an undertaking acquiring control of another undertaking – or being able to exercise decisive influence over another undertaking ‒ by means of contracts or other arrangements.

The establishment of a joint venture (in which two or more shareholders have joint control) is deemed a concentration of the controlling shareholders.

Monetary Thresholds

The thresholds that trigger the obligation to notify mainly focus on the turnover of undertakings participating in the concentration. In particular, concentrations that reach the following thresholds must be notified:

  • the aggregate global turnover achieved by all the undertakings to the proposed concentration exceeded RMB10 billion and each of at least two of the undertakings to the concentration has had a turnover of more than RMB400 million within mainland China in the previous financial year; or
  • the aggregate turnover in mainland China achieved by all the undertakings to the proposed concentration exceeded RMB2 billion and each of at least two of the undertakings to the concentration has had a turnover of more than RMB400 million within mainland China in the previous financial year.

The Draft Amendments to the Rules of the State Council on the Notification Thresholds for Concentrations of Undertakings (the “Draft Amendments”), which was published on 27 June 2022, propose to increase the individual turnover threshold of each of at least two undertakings participating in the concentration to RMB800 million within China – thereby doubling the original figure. In addition, the draft amendments also increase the combined turnover thresholds by RMB2 billion to RMB12 billion globally and RMB4 billion within China respectively.

The Draft Amendments also introduce a new provision on filing thresholds proposing to capture “killer acquisitions” initiated by large-scale enterprises that meet the following criteria:

  • during the previous fiscal year, the turnover of one of the undertakings to the concentration (normally the buyer or investor) exceeds RMB100 billion within China; and
  • the market value or valuation of the other undertaking(s) to the concentration (normally the target) is no less than RMB800 million and its Chinese turnover accounts for more than a third of its worldwide turnover during the previous fiscal year.

As of 13 October 2023, the proposed amendments have not officially come into effect and the thresholds may be subject to further amendments.

The primary labour law regulations in China concerning M&A transactions include the PRC Labour Contract Law, the Social Security Law and other employment-related legislation, administrative regulations, departmental rules, local regulations and judicial interpretations.

Employers are required to consult with trade unions concerning many aspects of M&A transactions, including the formulation and amendment of certain policies, retrenchments, unilateral termination of employment contracts, or extension of working hours.

Provisions of the PRC Labour Contract Law apply in an M&A transaction where the employer decides to retrench 20 or more employees or fewer than 20 employees but more than 10% of the employer’s workforce. In such cases, the employer must:

  • notify the trade union or all employees 30 days in advance of the retrenchment;
  • solicit opinions from the trade union or the employees; and
  • report the retrenchment scheme to the labour administrative authorities.

The trade union’s opinion is not binding on the employer, as it is merely a procedural requirement. It is not required that such retrenchment should be approved by the board, according to Article 41 of the PRC Labour Contract Law.

Where the requirements of retrenchment under Article 41 are not satisfied or the employer prefers not to apply Article 41 to terminate employment with employees, the employer may choose to reach a mutual termination agreement with each employee or transfer employees to the other entity designated in an M&A transaction (if applicable).

In addition, the employer may also choose to unilaterally terminate the employment contract with the employees for applicable causes under the PRC Labour Contract Law ‒ for example, “major change of objective circumstances” under Article 40.3 ‒ on a case-by-case basis. Where the unilateral termination applies, the employer is obligated to report to the trade union.

During an M&A transaction, if the employer formulates or amends policies that affect employees (eg, policies related to remuneration, working hours, labour safety and health, and labour discipline, etc), the employer is required to:

  • disclose and discuss the amends with the employee representative congress or all the employees in the first instance; and
  • subsequently negotiate them with the trade union or employee representatives.

The trade union has the right to raise its concerns regarding any issues with the employer and such issues should be addressed through negotiation. The employer will disclose this formulation and amendment of certain policies with all its employees.

China has currency control regulations that limit the convertibility of the country’s official currency, the renminbi, into foreign currencies (and vice versa). In China, foreign exchange in connection with an M&A deal is permissible as long as the necessary filing procedures have been completed with the competent foreign exchange authority or its designated commercial banks.

On 17 February 2023, the CSRC – as approved by the State Council – released new rules for the filing-based administration of overseas securities offerings and listings by Chinese domestic companies (the “New Filing Rules”). The New Filing Rules signal a new era of unified filing systems for overseas offerings and listings by Chinese companies. From 31 March 2023, any PRC-based company that has submitted valid applications for overseas offerings and listings but has not obtained the approval from overseas regulatory authorities or overseas stock exchanges must complete the filing procedures with the CSRC prior to its overseas offerings and listings. This is a new requirement under the PRC laws.

Owing to the requirements of this new regulation, Chinese-based companies with offshore structures now face additional regulatory procedures when going public overseas, making the IPO process for such companies more extensive than before. As a result, an increasing number of red-chip structured companies are also exploring the path of M&A as an exit strategy.

A public company is allowed to provide due diligence information to bidders with regard to its operations and other relevant matters. Certain information may not be provided, such as confidential information not yet publicly disclosed or information pertaining to state secrets. If it is a public bid, the public company will generally provide the same information to all bidders. The company may allow for a reasonable level of technology due diligence, which will vary on a case-by-case basis, depending on the specific requirements of the bidders and the negotiations between the parties.

The recently adopted Data Security Law (DSL) and the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) are the major PRC data laws that set certain limitations on the due diligence of a technological company.

The DSL and Its Implications

On 10 June 2021, the 29th meeting of the Standing Committee of the 13th National People’s Congress formally adopted the DSL, which took effect on 1 September 2021. The DSL is the first dedicated and comprehensive Chinese law on data security.

Enhanced protection obligations for important data and core data

The DSL lays down the framework for data classification and multi-level data protection requirements. Certain data crucial to national security and public interests must be categorised as important data requiring enhanced protection. As well as data classification, graded protection and important data catalogues, the DSL requires a more stringent administrative system for national core data, which is created by the DSL and vaguely defined as data related to:

  • national security;
  • the lifeline of the national economy;
  • people’s livelihoods in important areas; and
  • significant public interests.

In light of this, enhanced data protection requirements will apply where:

  • a technology company subject to due diligence may be deemed as a critical information infrastructure operator (CIIO); or
  • the due diligence involves important data or core data.

Limitations on cross-border data transfers under the DSL

Relevant restrictions under the DSL apply where due diligence data comprises important data and to the export of such data, including transferring a copy abroad or allowing remote access from another jurisdiction outside mainland China.

The DSL requires the competent authorities to conduct a security assessment before important data collected and generated by CIIOs can be transferred cross-border. The DSL further stipulates that the cross-border transfer of important data pertaining to non-CIIOs is subject to security assessment or restrictions issued by the CAC and other relevant departments.

Based on the DSL, the Security Assessment Measures for Outbound Data Transfers (the “Security Assessment Measures”), which was published by CAC and took effect on 1 September 2022, requires data processors who provide important data abroad to apply to the CAC for security assessment. It also specifies the application procedures and materials to be submitted, along with other requirements. The CAC also published the Guidelines for Application of Security Assessment for Data to Be Transferred Abroad (First Edition) to provide guidance on security assessment.

The PIPL and Its Implications

On 20 August 2021, the 30th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the 13th National People’s Congress formally adopted the PIPL, which came into effect on 1 November 2021. The PIPL is the first dedicated and comprehensive PRC law on personal information protection and is considered the Chinese counterpart to the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Advisability of obtaining consent from relevant individuals

As with the GDPR, personal information under Chinese law refers to any information that is related to identified or identifiable natural persons and has been recorded (electronically or otherwise). Anonymised information, which does not identify particular subjects, is not considered to be personal information.

Where personal information is used in the due diligence of a technology company, it is advisable to obtain the relevant individuals’ consent for processing the personal information ‒ despite the availability of other legal bases for processing, such as the performance of contracts. If the personal information is indirectly obtained from third-party vendors for such due diligence work, the contract with such vendors should include representations and warranties that the vendors will ensure the lawful collection and sharing of the personal information.

Cross-border data transfer limitations under the PIPL

The PIPL requires separate consent from individuals whose data will be transferred outside mainland China. Furthermore, the PIPL requires that CIIOs and certain high-volume personal information handlers pass a security assessment by the CAC before making such cross-border transfers.

The aforementioned high-volume personal information handlers are further defined in the Security Assessment Measures as those who process the personal information of more than a million individuals. Personal information handlers who have accumulatively exported personal information of no less than 100,000 individuals or sensitive personal information of no less than 10,000 individuals since January 1 of the previous year must also apply for the security assessment by the CAC, pursuant to the Security Assessment Measures. At the end of September 2023, the CAC issued the exposure draft of Provisions on Regulating and Promoting Cross-Border Data Flows(the “Draft Data Export Provisions”), which will exempt the security assessment or standard contractual clasues (SCC) filing requirements for less sensitive scenarios (eg, HR management-related data export). The Draft Data Export Provisions further set a lower bar (annual export of personal information of 10,000 individuals) for SCC filing and shift the threshold triggering the security assessment to annual export of personal information of 1 million individuals.

Information related to a bid (including its pricing) is required to be made public promptly, in accordance with relevant PRC laws and regulations. During the acquisition of a listed company, public disclosure of a bid is generally required either:

  • upon the execution of a term sheet or an official agreement by and between the parties; or
  • after a relevant resolution has been adopted by the company’s board of directors or board of supervisors.

Prospectus Requirements

A prospectus is required for the issuance of shares in a stock-for-stock takeover offer or business combination involving a listed company in certain circumstances. These include where the buyer is an unlisted domestic company (including foreign-invested enterprises) and the acquisition causes the buyer to have more than 200 shareholders.

The buyer may avoid the prospectus requirement by choosing to implement the stock-for-stock takeover as a major asset reorganisation of the target listed company. After obtaining CSRC approval, the buyer may directly apply to list its publicly issued shares on a stock exchange. In this way, the buyer is not required to prepare a prospectus – although it remains subject to the relevant IPO rules and requirements.

Exchange Listing Requirements

The buyer in a stock-for-stock takeover transaction of a listed target company must itself be exchange-listed or otherwise apply to list its shares. If the buyer is a foreign investor, for example, then it is required to be listed on an offshore exchange. Where the buyer is a domestic unlisted company, the buyer is required to apply to list all its shares on a domestic stock exchange in China.

Bidders are required to prepare and submit audited financial statements if their post-acquisition shareholding in a listed target company will reach or exceed 20% (whether the acquisition was in cash or stock-for-stock). In addition, if a buyer acquires shares in the target company in a private placement as part of a stock-for-stock acquisition, the buyer is required to submit relevant audited financial statements or a valuation report for the shares paid as consideration. These financial statements and reports must be prepared in accordance with either Chinese accounting standards or international accounting standards.

Transaction documents executed by the parties in order to complete a listed company acquisition must be filed with the stock exchange and/or the CSRC.

All the directors, as well as the supervisors and management, of a company must have the obligations of loyalty and diligence to the company under the PRC Company Law. This is similar to the concept of fiduciary duty under common law and is owed to the company.

It is not common for the board of directors to establish any committees in business combinations.

The board of directors of a company tends to play a limited role in Chinese M&A deals. The founders or controlling shareholders are usually more actively involved in negotiations than the board. Minority shareholders may be involved in the negotiations in a limited way, to the extent that the deal affects their own rights and interests (eg, in terms of consideration, escrow or tax withholding). The board’s decision to recommend an M&A deal is rarely challenged by shareholder litigation.

Financial advisers are commonly used to provide financial services and advice to the controlling shareholders or the founders of a company with regard to an M&A deal – especially in terms of valuation and deal structure. There have been limited cases in which a financial adviser was hired to provide a formal fairness opinion; however, this is not very common in domestic deals.

Han Kun Law Offices

9/F Office Tower C1
Oriental Plaza
1 East Chang An Avenue
Dongcheng District
Beijing 100738
China

+86 10 8525 5500

+86 10 8525 5511/5522

beijing@hankunlaw.com www.hankunlaw.com
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



DaHui Lawyers combines in-depth knowledge of China’s legal and business landscape with extensive international experience. The firm has particular strength in new economy industries as well as complex cross-border transactions. DaHui has become a go-to firm for multinational companies in the Chinese technology, media and internet/telecommunications sectors. The firm’s expertise in these highly regulated sectors has led to it becoming a key adviser and strategist to clients of all types and sizes in China’s emerging but challenging market, providing highly effective and solution-oriented services tailored to clients’ diversified business needs.

Introduction

China’s overall M&A activity in 2023 decreased in terms of both domestic and cross-border deals.

According to Wind, China saw 585 fewer domestic deals in the first three quarters of the year than it did during the same period in 2022 (ie, 6,101 compared with 6,686). Technology M&A in China did have an uptick in the second quarter of 2023, but markedly dropped in the third quarter; the direction of a trend, if any, remains to be seen.

Outbound M&A, which recovered somewhat in 2021, fell again in 2023. The announced deal value for the first half of 2023 came in at just over USD11.73 billion, according to a report from Ernst & Young. The decline is largely attributable to factors such as post-pandemic effects, geopolitical tensions, and fluctuations in the stock market.

The TMT sector, however, still has the most outbound M&A deals in China. Specifically, in the first half of 2023, it accounted for 69 deals ‒ more than 30% of all outbound M&A deals, according to the aforementioned Ernst & Young report.

Foreign Investment 

Contrary to what geopolitical trends might suggest, China continues to open its markets to foreign investors, including (if not especially) in many tech sectors. Although parts of the Chinese economy remain subject to foreign investment restrictions (ie, limiting or prohibiting foreign participation in various industry sectors), the level of such restrictions continued to decrease through 2023.

Unlike previous years, in 2023, China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) did not update the Special Administrative Measures (Negative List) for Access to Foreign Investment (the “Negative List”), which specifies prohibited sectors and the maximum foreign shareholding limits for limited sectors. However, both Beijing and Jiangsu provinces promulgated regulations or draft regulations – such as Beijing Foreign Investment Provisions (Draft for Comments) and the Provisions on Encouragement and Protection of Foreign Investment of Jiangsu Province – that encourage foreign investment and promote creative trial regulations in their respective free trade zones. As a general example, Beijing’s draft regulation promotes an online foreign-invested enterprise registration process. If all verification and registration processes can be carried out online, it will significantly simplify and accelerate the establishment process for foreign-invested entities in Beijing.

Foreign capital in the technology sector continues to grow. According to a MOFCOM press conference, during the first quarter of 2023, the high-tech sector’s utilised foreign investment rose by 18% ‒ among which electronic and communication equipment manufacturing grew by 55.7%, science and technology outcome conversion increased by 50.3%, R&D and design services rose by 24.6%, and pharmaceutical manufacturing went up by 20.2%.

Foreign Investment in TMT

The market entry requirements for obtaining value-added telecommunications operating licences have been further eased under the Administrative Provisions on Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises (the “FITE Provisions”) since 1 May 2022. With such easing, the number of foreign-invested enterprises in the value-added telecommunications service sector also continues to increase. According to statistics issued by the China Academy of Information and Communication Technology, the total number of foreign-invested enterprises in value-added telecommunications increased from 1,097 to 1,448 from September 2022 to June 2023.

The key amendments in the FITE Provisions include the removal of the previous requirement placed on foreign-invested companies to demonstrate that their principal shareholders/parent companies have a “good track record in the telecommunications business”. The telecommunications track record requirement may have precluded foreign financial investors (eg, USD-denominated funds) from taking significant stakes in Chinese companies performing internet/telecommunications activities, given that such investors could be viewed as lacking established experience of providing telecommunications services.

Before May 2022, some strategic investors in this industry even had to adopt alternative structures to bypass the “good track record” requirement. Since the deregulation, however, foreign investors seeking to obtain telecommunications operating licences in China and to become FITEs are expected to have a much easier and more straightforward experience.

Artificial Intelligence Legislation

On 10 July 2023, the Cybersecurity Administration of China (CAC) – alongside six other PRC government departments – released the Interim Measures for the Administration of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services (the “Generative AI Measures”), effective as of 15 August 2023. Any entity, organisation or individual that provides services that generate any text, images, audios, videos or other content to the general public in mainland China using “generative AI technology” (“generative AI services”) will be subject to the Generative AI Measures. In addition to incorporating China’s long-standing online service/content requirements and other relevant regulations, the Generative AI Measures require generative AI service providers to:

  • execute service agreements with users who register for their generative AI services;
  • employ effective measures aimed at preventing minors from becoming over-reliant on or addicted to such services;
  • prominently label pictures, videos and other generated content in a reasonable place or area in order to alert the public to the services’ artificial/edited status if the generative AI service providers offer “deep synthesis” services;
  • promptly stop the generation or transmission of illegal content and remove it, and employ measures (such as model optimisation training) to rectify the processes responsible for generating such content, as well as reporting to relevant authorities;
  • carry out a security assessment in accordance with relevant state provisions; and
  • complete an “algorithm filing” via the CAC’s designated online platform within ten working days of providing relevant services if the providers employ recommendation algorithms.

The Generative AI Measures also provide that PRC regulators may take necessary technical and other measures against generative AI services that are provided to users in China on an offshore level (ie, via servers and data hosted outside China) yet violate the Generative AI Measures or other PRC laws and regulations. In practice, the authors expect the most frequent result of such “extraterritorial” application of the measures to only be that non-compliant offshore generative AI services are restricted or blocked by China’s Great Firewall.

The Generative AI Measures, however, do not specify any penalties beyond those already provided for in existing PRC laws. By way of example, violations of the personal information protection provisions of the Generative AI Measures will likely only trigger penalties under the PRC Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), which may include a warning, an order for rectification, confiscation of illegal gains and a fine of up to RMB1 million.

The Generative AI Measures provide that, upon the request of PRC regulators, generative AI service providers must co-operate during an investigation into generative AI services and explain the source, scale, type, labelling rules, algorithm mechanisms, etc, of their training data, as well as provide necessary technical, data and other support and assistance. This provision is likely of most concern to foreign investors.

In general, the Generative AI Measures can be viewed as a helpful development that will eliminate regulatory uncertainties in this cutting-edge industry and hopefully lead to the release of many more generative AI technologies and services in the near future. Specifically, the requirements of the Generative AI Measures seem softer and more friendly towards innovation and business when compared with its draft version. In the first half of 2023, China led the world in the number of funded generative AI start-ups.

Company Law Revisions

On 29 December 2023, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress released revisions to the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China (the “Company Law Revisions”), which will come into effect on 1 July 2024. The Company Law Revisions affect every type of Chinese company (including foreign-invested ones) in various ways, such as:

  • corporate governance;
  • contribution of registered capital;
  • potential legal liability faced by directors, supervisors, senior officers and shareholders; and
  • processes for liquidation and deregistration.

The key changes impact M&A specifically in two ways.

  • First, whereas the former Company Law requires a shareholder resolution in any M&A circumstances, the Company Law Revisions will provide for two instances in which it would not be needed:
    1. when a company is being acquired by a parent holding at least 90% of the acquired company’s equity (although the acquired company must notify all other shareholders, who then have a right to have their equity purchased at a reasonable price); and
    2. when a company seeks to acquire another company through consideration that does not exceed 10% of the acquiror’s net assets.
  • In addition, under the former Company Law, the shareholders of a limited liability company were not required to contribute the registered capital within a limited time. However, the Company Law Revisions impose a five-year time limit for contributing registered capital (commencing from the incorporation date).

Of course, there are changes in the Company Law Revisions that do not target M&A specifically but would nonetheless be relevant to acquirers and other investors ‒ for example, the expansion of liability for directors and a requirement that companies with 300 or more employees have an employee-representative director.

Cyber and Data

The areas of legislation, regulation and possibly enforcement that experienced the greatest growth in 2023 were cybersecurity and data protection. This trend has persisted in recent years, with implications across all tech activities ‒ not least in M&A.

Cybersecurity review

The so-called “cybersecurity review” was introduced with the promulgation of the Cybersecurity Law in 2016 and was emphasised by the issuance of the Cybersecurity Review Measures (CRM) of 2020. However, it has only recently shown – and further grown – its teeth.

On 1 September 2023, the CAC imposed a fine of RMB50 million against China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) – China’s equivalent of Google Scholar – for violating the Cybersecurity Law and the PIPL. CNKI’s violations included:

  • collecting personal information (PI) that was not necessary;
  • collecting PI without consent from subjects;
  • not disclosing or displaying the rules of collection and use of PI; and
  • not deleting users’ PI in a timely manner after they de-registered their accounts.

Cross-border data transfers

The biggest waves of 2023 in China’s data protection scene were made by the release of:

  • the Measures on Standard Contracts for the Outbound Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Information (the “SC Measures”), accompanied by the Guidelines on Standard Contract Filing for Outbound Cross-Border Transfers of Personal Information (the “SCC Filing Guidelines”); and
  • the Draft Regulation for Easing Cross-Border Data Transfers (the “Draft Easing Regulation”).

The broad framework set out in the PIPL – in which three avenues of regulatory compliance are provided for companies to choose from when transferring certain data out of China – is finally crystallising and thus likely coming into full effect. Any company acquiring or merging with a target that is itself a mainland China company (or that has substantial affiliates in mainland China) will have to pay more attention to regulatory compliance and its potential effects on operations in light of the concrete cross-border data transfer framework.

The SC Measures entered into effect on 1 June 2023 and, together with the Standard Contract for the Outbound Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Information (the “Standard Contract”) and the SCC Filing Guidelines, elaborate on the approach to legally exporting PI out of China. A PI handler engaging in the transfer of PI out of China based on contractual arrangements will be subject to the SC Measures unless such PI handler has already completed a PI protection certification from a qualified certification institution designated by the CAC. However, PI handlers that meet any of the threshold requirements for the mandatory application of the Data Export Security Assessment Measures (the “SA Measures”) will still remain subject to the CAC-led security assessment regime for their cross-border data transfers and are not permitted to engage in such transfers under the standard contract regime.

The SA Measures mandatorily apply to PI handlers transferring PI out of China in cases where the PI handler:

  • is a critical information infrastructure operator (CIIO) seeking to transfer PI offshore;
  • processes PI of more than a million data subjects and seeks to transfer any PI offshore;
  • transfers offshore, on a cumulative basis, PI of more than 100,000 data subjects within a period commencing on January 1 of the preceding year; or
  • transfers offshore, on a cumulative basis, the sensitive PI of more than 10,000 data subjects within a period commencing on January 1 of the preceding year.

The SC Measures also provide that the exporter must conduct a PI protection impact assessment (PIPIA). This should address a number of issues, mainly concerning the legality, legitimacy and associated risks of proposed transfers of PI, as well as the adequacy of proposed security measures to protect the same.

Similarly, a data exporter must not only execute a contract that substantially resembles the Standard Contract but must also file it and the PIPIA to the local provincial branch of the CAC within ten days. These are less stringent and burdensome requirements than those required by a security assessment.

However, on 28 September 2023, the CAC released the Draft Easing Regulation, which – if ultimately issued substantially in its present form – would benefit many multinational companies as they transfer various kinds of data out of China. The substance of the Draft Easing Regulation consists of exceptions to the requirements summarised earlier. By way of example, none of the PI export requirements under the SA Measures would apply in the following circumstances:

  • PI exporting that is necessary for the conclusion or performance of a contract to which the PI subject is a party, such as cross-border shopping, payments, ticket and hotel bookings, visa applications, etc;
  • exporting PI of employees for the purpose of implementing HR management according to employment policies and collective labour contracts;
  • exporting PI of no more than 10,000 individuals within one year;
  • exporting PI for the purpose of protecting an individual’s life, health, or property security in emergency situations;
  • exporting PI that is not collected or generated within mainland China; or
  • exporting non-PI data that is collected or generated during international trade, academic co-operation, cross-border manufacturing and marketing, and certain other as-yet unspecified activities – unless such data is recognised as “important data”.

The Draft Easing Regulation is expected to be issued soon and reduce the headaches that acquirers of Chinese companies would otherwise have in integrating local with overseas operations and administration.

Anti-Monopoly Law

Following the amendments to the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) passed in 2022, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) released four ancillary regulations – namely, the Provisions on the Prohibition of Monopoly Agreements, the Provisions on the Prohibition of the Abuse of a Dominant Market Position, the Provisions on the Review of Concentrations of Undertakings (the “Concentration Provisions”) and the Provisions on the Prohibition of the Abuse of Administrative Power to Exclude or Restrict Competition (collectively, the “Four New Provisions”).

The Four New Provisions clarify various matters of anti-monopoly law and provide enterprises with more accurate guidance. By way of example, the Concentration Provisions elaborate on several factors relevant to determining an “implementation of concentration”, including:

  • whether a market entity registration or registration of changes in rights has been completed;
  • whether senior management have been appointed;
  • whether one undertaking is actually participating in the business decision-making and management of another undertaking;
  • whether one undertaking has exchanged any sensitive information; and
  • whether one undertaking has substantially merged its business with another undertaking.

According to the AML, if an undertaking implements a concentration in violation of the AML, it may face a fine of as much as 10% of the sales from the preceding year or RMB5 million.

On 26 December 2022, the SAMR imposed a fine of RMB87.6 million on CNKI for violating the AML. Among other things, the SAMR found that CNKI used unfairly high prices, restricted transaction exclusions, limited market competition, and impacted market innovation, development and academic exchanges.

DaHui Lawyers

37/F China World Tower A
1 Jianguomenwai Avenue
Beijing 100004
China

+86 10 6535 5888

+86 10 6535 5899

info@dahuilawyers.com www.dahuilawyers.com
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Han Kun Law Offices has been widely recognised throughout the years as a leader in complex cross-border and domestic transactions. The firm’s main practice areas include private equity, M&A, international and domestic capital markets, investment funds, asset management, compliance, banking and finance, aviation finance, foreign direct investment, antitrust/competition, data protection, private client/wealth management, IP, bankruptcy and restructuring and dispute resolution. Han Kun has nearly 800 professionals located in its offices in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hong Kong, Haikou and Wuhan – as well as in Singapore, a leading financial centre in the Asia-Pacific. All the firm’s lawyers are graduates of top universities and have extensive experience in complex cross-border transactions and dispute resolution as counsel to both Chinese and foreign clients.

Trends and Developments

Authors



DaHui Lawyers combines in-depth knowledge of China’s legal and business landscape with extensive international experience. The firm has particular strength in new economy industries as well as complex cross-border transactions. DaHui has become a go-to firm for multinational companies in the Chinese technology, media and internet/telecommunications sectors. The firm’s expertise in these highly regulated sectors has led to it becoming a key adviser and strategist to clients of all types and sizes in China’s emerging but challenging market, providing highly effective and solution-oriented services tailored to clients’ diversified business needs.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.