In 2024, venture capital investments in Korea amounted to KRW11.9 trillion, with an increase of 9.5% compared to the previous year. The number of companies attracting venture investments also reached 4,697, the highest number ever recorded in Korean venture investment history.
The Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector remained the most attractive, with a 38% increase compared to the previous year, maintaining the upward trend observed in the prior period. Following ICT, substantial investments were made in the bio/medical and electrical/mechanical/equipment sectors.
This year, three companies that attracted investments of KRW1 billion or more were all from the ICT sector: ETECH SYSTEM (KRW180 billion), which operates a cloud business, Rebellion (KRW165 billion), an AI semiconductor start-up, and Upstage (KRW100 billion), a generative AI development start-up. ETECH SYSTEM attracted investment solely from SG Private Equity, while Rebellion gained attention for receiving investment from Aramco, the world’s largest energy and chemical company, marking the first such investment as a venture company in Korea.
According to the 2024 Venture Capital Market Brief, published by the Korea Venture Capital Association, new funding for venture capital firms in 2024 fell by approximately 15.4% compared to 2023, while new investments by venture capital firms increased by 22.9% year-on-year. In addition, a majority (54.4% to be exact) of the investment recovered by venture capital firms was recovered through third-party sales, whereas 30.6% of such investments were recovered through IPOs. While the number of IPOs increased and the proportion of third-party sales declined in 2023, 2024 saw a slight reduction in IPO activity, accompanied by an increase in the proportion of third-party sales.
According to the 2024 Venture Capital Market Brief, published by the Korea Venture Capital Association, the ICT service sector accounted for the highest share of VC investments at 31.3%, followed by the bio/medical sector at 16.1%. Building on the trends observed in 2023, there has been a notable increase in investor interest in “deep tech” start-ups, particularly in the AI semiconductor and robotics industries. This has led to a substantial rise in investments in the ICT services, ICT manufacturing, and electrical, mechanical, and equipment sectors. Conversely, investments in the film, performance, and music industries have experienced a significant decline.
In Korea, venture capital funds are commonly established and operated in the form of a partnership, trust or corporation. Each form of entity is subject to different regulations, with a different set of incorporation requirements, and there are standardised versions of incorporation documents for each form of entity. For example, a venture capital fund established as a partnership requires an investment partnership agreement to be executed by the partners, whereas a venture capital fund established as a trust requires a trust agreement to be executed with a trust company, an investment agreement to be executed between the general partner and limited partners, and articles of association for the management of the fund. Lastly, a venture capital fund established as a corporation must have in place the articles of incorporation that regulate matters relating to management of the fund.
Fees payable to fund initiators/managers/principals (“Fund Principals”) are usually divided into (i) management or operating fees, and (ii) carried interest. Carried interest is determined on a case-by-case basis, and as a general matter, it is customary for approximately 20% of the excess profit to be paid as carried interest if the internal rate of return (IRR) exceeds a certain threshold, normally 7–8%.
The following key terms pertaining to the relationship between Fund Principals and investors are included in the standardised form of the investment partnership agreement published by the Korea Venture Capital Association, which form is widely used in practice:
Domestic venture capital funds are regulated under the Venture Investment Promotion Act (VIPA), which was enacted and came into effect in 2020. VIPA brings together regulations on venture-related investments that used to be dispersed across several pre-existing pieces of legislation, including the Act on Special Measures for the Promotion of Venture Businesses and the Support for Small and Medium Enterprise Establishment Act. Compared to previous regulations, VIPA partially relaxes regulations on investment in venture companies in order to promote such investments by private investors. In addition, to cultivate an environment favourable to venture capital investment that conforms to global standards, VIPA allows for the execution of a simple agreement for future equity (SAFE) with a venture company. Such agreements, though widely used in venture capital investment in the United States, were not previously recognised under Korean law. In addition, the issuance of convertible notes by venture companies has also been permitted.
In Korea, investment of government funds in venture companies and start-ups, through the formation of a fund of funds, and with the aim of fostering the growth of venture companies and start-ups, is active. A fund of funds is a parent fund that invests in one or more funds formed by private venture capitalists aiming to invest in SMEs and start-ups. A fund of funds is formed with government funds sourced from the Ministry of SMEs and Start-Ups, the Korea SMEs and Start-Ups Agency, the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, the Korean Intellectual Property Office and other government departments and agencies. A fund of funds invests in other funds established using venture capital, and the latter invests in venture companies/start-ups. In most cases, the main investment by a particular fund of funds will be restricted to a particular sector.
In most cases, venture capital fund investors conduct a level of due diligence similar to that conducted for a typical M&A transaction. In the case of targets that obtain venture capital investments, funding typically occurs over multiple rounds, so at each stage, it is necessary to take a close look at the terms of the investment agreement(s) executed in the previous round(s). In addition, due to the nature of venture capital investments, target companies are often start-ups that are tech-focused or based on online platforms, so IP and personal information protection are often key areas of focus in due diligence.
It usually takes two to four months (including due diligence) for each round to be closed. However, it is difficult to determine a uniform timeline because the progression of a deal differs for each investment, depending on various factors and requirements (the size of the investment, whether existing investors participate in the new round with multiple investors, whether joint counsel is used, whether the consents of all existing shareholders are required, etc).
Venture capital firms prefer to invest in redeemable convertible preferred stock (RCPS), which is a type of preferred stock with both redemption right and conversion right, or convertible preferred stock (CPS), which is a type of preferred stock with conversion right only, at an early stage of a company’s development. In addition, venture capital firms often make investments in the form of convertible bonds or bonds with warrant.
Securities with these characteristics are preferred at an early stage because they provide better opportunities to (i) secure exit by providing the holder with a priority in payment of distributions in the event of liquidation or occurrence of a redemption-triggering event, and (ii) realise the upside potential of the target company with the right to convert securities into common stock.
Historically, there was no standardised form of agreement for venture capital investment in South Korea. As a result, in many cases (especially if start-ups did not hire professional legal advisors, which was often the case), investment agreements and other legal documents were often poorly drafted or created by the investors themselves without assistance from lawyers. There was therefore a demand for improvement in the quality of investment agreements, and, as a result, the Korea Venture Capital Association, in collaboration with the Korea Business Angels Association and the Korea Accelerator Association, prepared and published a standard set of venture investment agreements to be used for different stages of investment (early, mid-term, and late investments). At present, venture capital firms in Korea tend to enter into investment agreements by using these standardised forms, which are then customised to meet the needs of a given investment.
In general, venture capital firms try to secure downside protection through liquidation/dividend distribution preferences, conversion rights (including customary adjustment to conversion price), redemption rights, anti-dilution protection, consent rights over material matters, put options against the major/controlling shareholder of the target company, and information rights.
Both anti-dilution protections and pre-emption rights are frequently used. Venture capital firms may secure the right to consent to the issuance of securities, or include the issuance of securities at a price lower than their subscription price as a ground for adjusting the conversion price, or secure the right to subscribe for new shares issued by the company pro rata to their relative shareholding ratios (“pre-emption right”).
As a general matter, the following rights are usually granted to venture capital investors in relation to the company’s corporate governance.
Right to Appoint Director(s)
The venture capital investor will have the right to nominate a certain number of directors, and the parties to the investment agreement with the investor (typically the target company and the largest shareholder) will be contractually obliged to appoint person(s) nominated by the investor as director(s) by voting accordingly at a general meeting of shareholders. In Korea, directors of a company are listed in a company registry (which is a publicly available document), and there is no nationality or residency requirement for directorship. Also, investors often seek and obtain the right to nominate an observer to the board of directors. For reference, in Korea, an observer is, unlike a director, a de facto position, which has no legal basis in the Korean Commercial Act.
Consent Rights Over Material Matters
The type of material matters over which the venture capital investor has a consent right may vary depending on the negotiation of the parties involved, but in general, they usually include amendments to the articles of incorporation, changes in capital structure, fundamental changes in the company’s organisation (such as dissolution, liquidation, merger, division, division and merger and business transfer), issuance of new securities, grant of stock options, and significant transactions (ie, those with a value exceeding a certain threshold).
Information Rights
The right to receive important financial/operational information of the company, and the type of information that the investor has the right to receive may vary depending on the negotiations of the parties involved, but they often include financial statements, business plans and budget plans at certain intervals.
The representations and warranties, covenants, and indemnity clauses and mechanisms observed in a financing round are similar to those included in an agreement for a typical M&A contract. Certain caveats to this are set out below.
Representations and Warranties/Covenants
A venture capital firm may not make representations, warranties, or covenants in the investment agreement, or make only fundamental representations and warranties (eg, incorporation or due authorisation) and basic covenants (eg, confidentiality obligations). However, if the investor is required to obtain any particular regulatory approvals (eg, clearance of merger filing or foreign exchange filing) in relation to the execution and performance of the agreement, the agreement will include representations, warranties and/or covenants related to obtaining such approvals. Target companies usually provide a fairly detailed set of representations and warranties relating to their operation and businesses, including financial statements, labour, intellectual property, real properties, etc.
Recourse for Breach/Violation
If the target company breaches any of its representations, warranties or covenants, in the case of an investment in RCPS, the company may be obliged to effect an early redemption of the RCPS as a result of the breach. In such cases, the penalty rate will apply in addition to the default interest rate until the redemption amount is fully paid. In addition, the company may be required to pay penalties to the venture capital investor in addition to compensation for damages resulting from the breach. In some cases, the investor may become entitled to exercise a default put option against the largest shareholder in the event of a breach.
There is no meaningful incentive programme for investors who make equity investments in SMEs and start-ups in Korea; instead, the Korean government provides support through providing funds for (i) investments in funds of funds and (ii) the expansion of investment in SMEs and start-ups.
A fund of funds is a fund funded by the Korean government that is mainly intended for investment in certain sectors. Specifically, a fund of funds is managed by Korea Venture Investment Corp., an institution established by the Korean government in accordance with VIPA. Korea Venture Investment Corp. selects a general partner, causes the general partner to form a fund with funding received from a fund of funds and capital received by the general partner from other investors, and the fund then makes investments in a certain sector. The investment targets of a fund of funds will vary depending on the fund in question, but they mainly include early-stage start-up companies, privately held SMEs and venture companies, and there are cases in which concentrated support is given to investment in a particular sector as needed.
Key characteristics of tax treatment relevant to venture capital investments are as follows:
As discussed above, the Korean government uses the fund of funds structure to create an environment favourable to venture investment in the private sector and to promote investment linked to innovation, especially in SMEs and venture companies. Although there are no restrictions on the investment methods of a fund of funds, a fund of funds is often used in equity financing for innovative technology businesses, start-up companies, and privately held SMEs. In this way, the government indirectly supports equity financing activities.
The most frequently used method to procure the founders’/key employees’ long-term commitment is the grant of stock options. Under the applicable laws and regulations of Korea, officers or employees must have worked at a company for a minimum of two years to exercise their stock options. A separate stock option agreement can be executed to require a longer period of service as a condition for exercising all or part of the stock options.
In recent years, the grant of restricted stock units (RSUs) has been on the rise. An RSU refers to the right to receive treasury shares held by the company if certain conditions are met. In this case, a method typically used is the incremental grant of shares upon the fulfilment of conditions linked to the period of service.
Effective 10 July 2024, an amendment to the Special Act on the Promotion of Venture Businesses (“Venture Business Act”) was enacted, facilitating the use of restricted stock units (RSUs) by venture companies. To grant RSUs, a venture company must acquire treasury shares as the source of funding. However, under the Korean Commercial Code, the acquisition of treasury shares was previously limited to the extent of distributable profits, which posed a practical challenge for early-stage venture companies, which often struggle to generate profits. The recent amendment to the Venture Business Act now permits venture companies to purchase their own shares, even without distributable profits, provided that such purchases do not result in capital impairment. This change is expected to promote more active utilisation of RSUs by venture companies moving forward.
The most commonly used method to align the interests of founders/key employees with the interests of the company is the grant of stock options. A recent development is the grant of RSUs to this end. In both cases, it is common to stipulate that the conditions for exercising/granting stock options/RSUs are linked to the period of service. To take stock options as an example, when a stock option with the right to receive a total of 100 new shares is granted, a condition attached can be that the stock option with respect to the first 50 shares can be exercised after two years of service, and the stock option with respect to the remaining 50 shares can be exercised after four years of service. The conditions for exercising/granting stock options/RSUs can also be linked to other performance indicators.
Under Korean tax laws and regulations, in principle, the difference between the market price of shares at the time of exercising the stock option and the exercise price is taxed as earned income (at the rate of up to 49.5%), but special measures provide for tax benefits with respect to stock options granted to officers and employees of a venture company registered with the Ministry of SMEs and Start-Ups. These special measures include:
If a company already has an employee incentive programme in place at the time of due diligence, or if a company plans to implement such programme during the investment process, such programme should be recognised as a dilution factor and reflected in the number of shares to be acquired before proceeding with the investment. In contrast, if an employment incentive programme is to be introduced after the venture capital investment has already been made, the programme would be subject to the investor’s right to consent.
Typically, an investor exits through an IPO or third-party sale. Depending on the specific situation at the time of exit, the investor can choose either of these options, or consider a dual track by pursuing both options at the same time. In addition, RCPS investors may consider exercising their redemption rights, or they may exercise a put option, if such options are provided in their investment agreements.
In Korea, when an investor makes a venture capital investment, it is not common for all shareholders to enter into a shareholders’ agreement; instead, it is more customary for each investor to execute an investment agreement only with the company and the largest shareholder/founder without other shareholders. As a result, there is often no one-size-fits-all contractual clause applying to the relationship among all shareholders in the event of an IPO or trade sale. More generally, each shareholder is entitled to exercise certain rights (eg, the right to demand a qualified IPO to be effected within a certain time period and/or a put option) against the company and/or its major shareholder/founder.
It is not common for an investment agreement executed by a Korean venture capital investor to include an agreement to limit the disposal of venture capital investors’ shares, but the investor may sometimes be deprived of certain rights granted under the investment agreement (eg, consent right, consultation right or right to nominate directors) if their shareholding percentage in the company falls below a certain threshold.
According to the 2024 Venture Capital Market Brief, published by the Korea Venture Capital Association, 54.4% of the investments recovered by venture capital investors were recovered through third-party sales, whereas 30.6% of investments were recovered through IPOs. Many start-ups have an IPO as their ultimate goal, and the average time for start-ups to successfully go public is generally thought to be about 10 to 14 years. The reason why it takes so long is not due to any legal hurdles, but because it takes a significant amount of time, commercially and practically, for a start-up to grow into a company that satisfies the qualitative and quantitative requirements to pass the listing eligibility review by the Korea Exchange (KRX).
Since KRX listing is relatively attractive in terms of initial cost and maintenance costs, almost all Korean start-ups established under Korean law choose to be listed in Korea, unless there is a particular need to raise capital overseas. As of 2024, the proportion of venture capital-backed companies listed on the KOSDAQ is 63.1%, which is an increase of 8.7 percentage points from 54.4% in 2023.
Recently, the Korean financial authorities have restructured the IPO system to prevent the sharp decline in stock prices of newly listed companies and protect individual investors by expanding the allocation of IPO shares to institutional investors with lock-up agreements. Under the revised regulation, effective in March 2025, more than 40% of the institutional investor’s volume (or 30% if the securities registration statement is filed by the end of 2025) must be prioritised for institutional investors with lock-up agreements. If the increase in lock-up for institutional investors leads to a reduction in the circulating stock volume, it may result in greater stock price volatility, making it more difficult for venture capitalists to recover their investments. This could also impact new investments made by venture capital firms, as they often rely on capital recovery to secure investment resources.
Recently, an atmosphere of active secondary market trading has taken hold in Korea. Due to the recent downturn in the IPO market, investors’ need for exits through secondary sales has increased. In addition, demand for investment through the secondary market is also increasing, as funds of funds have recently allocated their funding to funds that invest through secondary trading.
As secondary sales are often powered by funds of funds in Korea, the most important aspect of a secondary market deal is the price negotiation between the seller and the buyer. The seller fund needs to meet the target rate of return, while the buyer fund wants to keep the purchase price low, considering the expected price at the time of exit.
Warranty and indemnity (W&I) insurance policies are sometimes used in these secondary market deals, because the seller is a fund that was not responsible for the operation of the target company and does not want to provide representations and warranties on such matters, nor the corresponding indemnity. Even when the seller is willing to provide such representations and warranties and indemnity, the seller may have been dissolved or liquidated by the time that the buyer wants to exercise this right.
The KRX has three markets: KOSPI, KOSDAQ, and KONEX. KOSPI is the market for blue-chip conglomerates (a company with sales of KRW100 billion or more and that satisfies certain criteria including a base market capitalisation of KRW200 billion or more and equity of KRW150 billion or more). KOSDAQ is the market for “medium-sized” companies (ie, a company with KRW5 billion or more in profit from continuing operations before corporate income tax, a base market capitalisation of KRW30 billion or more, and sales volume of KRW10 billion in the most recent fiscal year). KONEX is a market for SMEs.
The English versions of the KOSPI Market Listing Regulation, the KOSDAQ Market Listing Regulation, and the KONEX Market Listing Regulation are available here. In addition, the listing requirements for each market are summarised in English here.
The restrictions that, among others, may apply to foreign investment in Korea are set out below.
Sectors in Which Foreign Investment Is Restricted
There are certain sectors where foreign investment is prohibited. These sectors include postal services; central banks; legislative agencies; administrative agencies; courts; prosecutors’ offices; police; fire departments; educational institutions (including early childhood education institutions, primary schools, middle schools, high schools and universities, graduate schools, and special schools); art, industrial, professional, political, religious, labour, and environmental movement organisations; nuclear power generation businesses; and radio and terrestrial broadcasting businesses.
The ratio of foreign investment in companies in certain sectors may not exceed a certain threshold. For example, the foreign investment ratio must be less than 50% in companies engaged in beef cattle breeding, air transportation, and magazine and newspaper publishing.
A detailed list of prohibited or restricted areas is published annually by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE).
Government Approval
A prospective foreign investor in certain restricted sectors must obtain approval from the relevant government agency:
A prospective foreign investor in a defence company must obtain prior approval from MOTIE.
A foreign investor wishing to invest in a company that possesses “national core technology” or to transfer “national core technology” overseas must obtain prior approval from MOTIE. National core technologies include those related to semiconductors, displays, batteries, automobiles/railways, steel, shipbuilding, nuclear energy, information and communication, and biotechnology. The list of national core technologies is published by MOTIE.
Recently, the Korean government has taken steps to strengthen the protection of national core technologies. Some provisions of the Foreign Investment Promotion Act, effective from 28 July 2016, require foreign investors acquiring control over companies managing defence industry companies, where there are concerns that it may affect the stable supply of defence materials, to undergo a review by the Foreign Investment Review Committee. Also, a legal amendment (Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology) has been passed, which includes regulations such as:
These changes are set to take effect on 22 July 2025. Therefore, potential foreign investors should closely examine the changes due to the strengthened sanctions resulting from the legal revisions.
Other Sectors
Other than the areas outlined above, foreign investment in Korean companies is generally not restricted. A foreign investor will generally be required to file an investment report or securities acquisition report with the Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency or a foreign exchange bank prior to the closing of its investment. The specific type and procedure for filing vary depending on the type of equity acquired and the amount of investment, but such reports are generally considered to be a routine matter.
Centropolis B
26 Ujeongguk-ro
Jongno-gu
Seoul 03161
Korea
+82 2 3404 0000
+82 2 3404 0001
bkl@bkl.co.kr www.bkl.co.kr/law?lang=en