The market for growth companies in Chile is relatively well developed within Latin America, although it remains small in scale compared to more mature global ecosystems such as the United States or Europe. Chile consistently ranks among the most advanced ecosystems in the region, with strong institutional, regulatory, and human capital foundations that facilitate the creation and scaling of start-ups.

In terms of trends, the Chilean market largely mirrors global venture capital cycles. Following the investment boom in 2021, the ecosystem underwent a correction between 2022 and 2024, followed by a recovery in 2025, in line with the global dynamic of adjustment and subsequent stabilisation in venture capital. However, this recovery has been more selective: capital is being concentrated in fewer start-ups, but with larger deal sizes, reflecting a global shift toward prioritising quality, efficiency, and proven business models.

In 2025, approximately USD854 million was invested, with an average ticket size of USD4.1 million per start-up. This information was provided by the Chilean Venture Capital Association (ACVC) to the media in Chile (as of the date of writing, the 2026 Impact Report, which covers the funding rounds from 2025, has not been published).

Among the main funding rounds of 2025 were:

• over USD300 million: Runway;
• over USD100 million: Xepelin;
• over USD50 million: ComunidadFeliz, Buk; and
• over USD30 million: AgendaPro, Toku Bioelements

In 2025, the Chilean venture capital market was characterised by a more disciplined and selective investment environment, reflecting a broader global normalisation following the post-2021 correction. Financing conditions improved modestly, but capital remained concentrated in fewer start-ups, with investors prioritising companies that demonstrated strong traction, clear paths to profitability, and capital efficiency. While early-stage investment (seed and Series A) continued to dominate, funding criteria became more stringent, and fewer companies advanced to later stages.

In terms of transaction structures, there was a clear shift toward greater valuation discipline and more investor-friendly terms compared to the peak years. Larger, conviction-based rounds became more common, often involving syndication with international investors, particularly in growth-stage financings where local capital remains limited. Overall, deal making reflected a focus on downside protection, sustainable growth, and proven business models, in line with global venture capital trends.

The industries that attracted the most capital in funding rounds were sports/entertainment, accounting for 37.4% of the total. They were followed by fintech/insurtech with 31%, and proptech/contech with 8.2%. These figures were provided by the ACVC (Chilean Venture Capital Association).

VC funds are typically structured through private investment funds managed by an administrator registered with the Financial Market Commission (CMF). Currently, there are corporate venture capital funds, family offices, and conventional VC funds. Some of these funds are composed entirely of private equity, while others combine equity with debt obtained through a CORFO credit line (ranging from USD6.7 million to USD89 million). It is also common to form a joint stock company (SpA) to pool capital, which is then invested in start-ups. In parallel, a separate SpA is often created to manage the fund and bring together the general partners and the VC team.

In general, fund principals participate in the fund’s economics by first charging a management fee, which typically ranges from 1% to 2.5% of the capital managed throughout the duration of the fund. On the other hand, they share in the fund’s success by receiving a carried interest, which is generally around 20%. Finally, it is common and preferred for the general partner(s) to also be contributors to the fund (due to tax limitations, they usually hold no more than 20% of the fund’s capital as contributors).

The Chilean ecosystem remains more focused on traditional fund structures and early-stage investing, with limited development of secondary or continuation-type strategies.

There is no specific regulation for venture capital funds. Both private and public funds are generally regulated by the Single Fund Law (No 20,712). However, there are certain specific benefits aimed at financing private funds, such as CORFO’s credit lines.

VC funds in Chile are supported by CORFO through financing lines that follow an equity/debt ratio of 2:1, 1:1, and 0.5:1. However, in recent years very few funds have been approved by CORFO, with lengthy processes becoming the norm, often leading applicants to drop out along the way.

Generally, these funds earmark a portion of their capital for follow-on rounds, with the objective of gradually liquidating investments throughout the life cycle. Finally, exits are not as common as in other markets.

In general, due diligence processes vary in intensity depending on the stage that the respective start-up is in. The main areas of focus are valuation, financial evaluation, market, founding team, technology used, clients, and governance.

As for legal due diligence, it typically includes reviewing the corporate structure, key contracts with clients, employment matters of employees and founders, tax compliance, litigation, and potentially regulatory issues affecting the company (eg, financial service providers regulated by the CMF).

The round duration generally depends on the number of investors and the stage the company is in. In early-stage investments, multiple investors usually conduct their own due diligence, which, even if simple, takes time and can distract the founders significantly. This process typically lasts between two to five months. In later stages, there is generally a lead investor who manages the due diligence process along with other VCs. Although more information is available at this stage, it is typically better organised, so the round generally takes between three to four months.

In Chile, the most common financing instrument at the early stage is the SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity), typically based on the Y Combinator model but adapted to comply with Chilean regulations. This facilitates setting up structures abroad (mainly Delaware and the Cayman Islands) in preparation for more advanced rounds, through the FLIP. These agreements allow investors to receive shares in a future funding round (a valuation cap is established, and potentially a discount) and generally do not specify an expiration date or interest associated with them.

Another commonly used instrument is the convertible loan, which is a debt instrument (a credit transaction) that can be converted into equity in future funding rounds, typically including a valuation cap and, in some cases, a discount. This instrument is subject to stamp tax, with the amount depending on various factors (amount, term, etc). To a lesser extent, capital increases with the issuance of ordinary or preferred shares are used. These instruments generally set rules for information and governance, preferential rights in liquidation, anti-dilution provisions, MFN (most favoured nation), etc.

In the Chilean venture capital market, secondary components are not yet a common feature of transactions and are only occasionally combined with primary investments. Most deals – particularly at early- and mid-stages – remain predominantly primary in nature, as the ecosystem continues to prioritise capital injection for growth over liquidity for existing shareholders.

In Chile, a start-up financing round in the growth stage typically involves the following key documents:

• Term Sheet: This is a preliminary document that outlines the basic terms and conditions of the investment. While non-binding in most of its clauses, it sets the foundation for subsequent negotiations.
• Capital Increase With Issuance of Paid Shares: This is an agreement where investors agree to contribute capital in exchange for shares in the company. Additionally, it may be agreed in parallel to purchase a certain number of shares from the founders, providing them with some liquidity.
• Shareholders’ Agreement: This is a crucial document that regulates the relationships between shareholders, including economic and political rights, drag-along and tag-along clauses, restrictions on share transfers, preemptive rights, and more.
• Statutory Modifications: These are legal documents that reflect the formal approval of the transaction by the company and any amendments to the by-laws agreed upon with the investor (typically, a new board of directors and governance structure is established).
• Supplementary Agreements: Depending on the case, these may include vesting contracts for founders (typically reverse vesting), stock option plans for employees, non-compete and confidentiality agreements, or specific clauses related to corporate control.

In Chile, there is no set of standardised, mandatory documents; however, it is common for ecosystem participants – particularly VC funds and incubators/accelerators – to refer to certain clauses from international models, especially those from the NVCA (National Venture Capital Association) in the United States, adapting them to Chilean legislation.

• Downside Scenario: In recent years, due to the current market conditions, clauses have been strengthened to protect investors during critical periods of the company, especially during liquidation. It is common for VC investors to have preferential rights to the proceeds in case of liquidation. Generally, these clauses allow them to recover their investment first (and in some cases, a multiple of it) before distributing the remaining proceeds among the founders and other shareholders. However, it is important to note that not all preference clauses have value. In a formal liquidation process under Law No 20.720 (the Law on Business and Personal Reorganization and Liquidation), the legal priority of credits applies, and creditors have precedence over shareholders in the distribution of the company’s assets.
• Anti-Dilution Clauses: SAFEs, commonly used in the early stages, usually do not include anti-dilution clauses because they are designed to be simple, quick, and favourable to start-ups at early stages. The original model from Y Combinator (widely used in Chile and adapted to our legislation) does not include anti-dilution clauses. “Weighted average” or “full ratchet” (to a lesser extent) are used in more advanced and growth-stage rounds. The most common mechanism is the “weighted average,” which adjusts the conversion price of preferred shares in the event of a future round at a lower valuation.
• Pre-Emption Rights: These are standard clauses in almost all shareholders’ agreements. They grant investors the right to participate proportionally in future funding rounds, allowing them to maintain their ownership percentage and avoid dilution. Like anti-dilution clauses, these are more commonly used in later-stage rounds and are rarely included in SAFEs.
• Additional Common Rights: In situations of greater uncertainty, clauses such as veto rights over key decisions, greater participation in the board of directors, and “pay-to-play” clauses, which require investors to participate in future rounds if they wish to retain certain privileges (such as preferential rights or anti-dilution), have also been strengthened. However, these clauses are also used in more advanced rounds and are rarely included in SAFE agreements.

Early-stage investors are generally not involved in the management of the company. However, in more advanced stages (Seed-Series A and beyond), while investors typically do not engage in the day-to-day operations of the start-ups, they do seek to ensure a significant level of control and influence over the company’s strategic and structural decisions through contractual clauses and corporate governance structures. Some of the most common rights that are negotiated include:

• Board Member Appointment: This allows investors to have direct visibility into management, access relevant information, and participate in key decisions. In some cases, it is agreed that certain decisions can only be approved with the favourable vote of the director appointed by the fund (veto right).
• Veto Rights on Strategic Matters: Through the shareholders’ agreement (sometimes incorporated into the company’s by-laws), investors often establish that certain matters require their prior consent, such as capital increases, sale of significant assets (in Chile, a shareholders’ meeting is also required to approve sales representing more than 50% of the company’s assets), debt exceeding certain amounts, changes to the corporate purpose or structure, issuance of new shares or convertible securities, amendments to the by-laws, among others.
• Access to Information: Investors usually include clauses granting them the right to receive periodic (monthly, quarterly, annual) updates on the financial, operational, and commercial status of the company. This is commonly included from early stages. It is also common to find clauses that grant the investor the right to audit or review financial statements and accounting records. Once they hold a seat on the board, the investor gains permanent access to such information.

Early Stage

Generally, in SAFE agreements (commonly used in early-stage investments), the investor makes general representations such as having the legal capacity, understanding the investment’s purpose, and acknowledging the risks involved.

The start-up typically declares that it is duly incorporated, in good standing, and in compliance with the laws of its jurisdiction, and that it has the necessary legal capacity to enter into and execute the SAFE agreement. It affirms that the instrument has been validly authorised by its competent corporate bodies and does not contravene any relevant laws, contracts, or active authorisations. The start-up also declares that executing the contract does not create conflicts or adversely affect its assets, operations, or essential licences. Finally, the company states that it possesses the necessary intellectual property rights for the development of its business, without infringing third-party rights.

Later Stages (Especially Series A and Beyond)

Typically, in capital increases, subscription agreements (post-capital increase), and/or shareholders’ agreements, the following conditions are included:

Representations and warranties

The most common include:

• The company is validly incorporated and operates in accordance with the law.
• The financial statements reasonably reflect the company’s financial situation.
• There are no hidden liabilities or ongoing material litigation.
• The intellectual property used belongs to the company and does not infringe third-party rights.
• There are no prior agreements that may affect the investment or the investor’s rights.
• The founders usually also declare that they have acted in good faith and disclosed all relevant information (the “full disclosure” clause).

Covenants and undertakings (future commitments and obligations)

Common covenants and undertakings include:

• not incurring debt above a certain threshold without board approval;
• not amending the by-laws without investor consent;
• not distributing dividends without prior approval;
• promptly informing investors of relevant events; and
• the obligation to dedicate full time to the business or not compete with the company for a specified period, etc (in the case of “founders’ covenants”).

Remedies

In the event of breaches or false representations/warranties, the investor may seek various remedies, which are typically specified in the contracts:

• the right to seek damages, with or without limits (eg, caps on liability or limited warranty periods);
• the right to repurchase shares at face value or with a discount if the breach is serious;
• the right to remove a founder from the board or management (in cases of misuse of funds, fraud, etc);
• clauses accelerating certain obligations or preferential rights; and
• in some cases, escrow agreements or retention of part of the committed capital as a guarantee against potential contingencies.

On the other hand, start-ups typically negotiate liability limitations, minimum thresholds for claims, and limited prescription periods (eg, 12 or 18 months).

Finally, it is very relevant to review the interpretation of such clauses from a judicial perspective in Chile to have an effective understanding of the scope and viability of each one.

One of CORFO’s financing lines is the FC line, designed for funds that invest in the development and growth of start-ups. This differs from the FE and FET lines, which are granted to funds investing in early-stage companies. A fund that obtains an FC line must focus on investing in start-ups that have a validated product or service with sales.

General Taxation Applicable to All Companies

Start-ups, like any other company in Chile (including those of investors), are subject to the general first-category tax (corporate tax) on their profits. Shareholders/investors (individuals) are taxed with final taxes (global complementary or additional tax) when they receive withdrawals or distributions of profits.

Profits obtained from the sale of start-up shares will be subject to taxes, although in some cases, they may qualify for exemptions or benefits established in the Income Tax Law, depending on the specific case.

Taxation Applicable to Investment Funds

Investors participating through regulated vehicles such as public or private investment funds can benefit from a more efficient tax treatment. The Single Fund Law (LUF) establishes that funds do not pay taxes on their capital gains, but taxes are incurred at the contributor level, which allows for deferral of taxation until the actual withdrawal of profits.

In Chile, recent governments have developed various initiatives to promote financing through capital in early-stage and growth-stage ventures, with a special focus on start-ups and innovative companies. The main public institution responsible for these policies is CORFO (Corporación de Fomento de la Producción), which has played a key role in the development of the venture capital ecosystem.

Some of the most relevant initiatives include:

• Financing Programmes for Investment Funds: CORFO has launched financing lines where it co-invests with an investment fund, not as a contributor but as a creditor of the fund through a credit line.
• Contributions to Start-Ups: Through instruments such as Start-Up Chile and Capital Semilla, among others, CORFO provides money to support entrepreneurs in the early stages, facilitating their subsequent access to investment rounds.
• Capital Markets Strengthening Initiatives: CORFO and Start-Up Chile have also collaborated on the development of platforms such as ScaleX (Santiago Venture Exchange), an alternative market on the Santiago Stock Exchange designed for start-ups and scale-ups to raise capital more efficiently.

These public policies have been crucial in building the venture capital ecosystem in Chile, attracting both national and international investors, and promoting a culture more open to risk investment.

In Chile, venture capital investors typically secure the commitment of founders and key employees through vesting clauses (reverse vesting for those who are already shareholders), which allow shares or economic rights to be acquired or consolidated gradually over time. These clauses are complemented by transfer restrictions, buyback rights (under certain conditions, the price per share is penalised), and non-compete agreements, all aimed at aligning the incentives of the founding team with the sustainable development of the business.

The most commonly used instrument to incentivise founders and key employees is primarily the stock option agreement in its various forms (depending on whether it is vesting for founders or stock options for employees).

A typical vesting period of four years with a one-year cliff is usually established, during which the beneficiary gradually acquires rights over the shares. Reverse vesting is also used, especially for founders, where the company has the right to repurchase shares in the event of early departure.

These instruments are usually tied to the beneficiary staying with the company, and the shares can be fully or partially lost if the employment or business relationship ends. It is important to note that the reason for the departure is relevant in these cases, and it could determine the forfeiture of the shares in the event of early departure.

From the worker’s perspective, generally, the stock option and vesting do not trigger taxation. In the case of exercising the option, if there is an increase in value (between the market value of the shares at the time of exercise and the price paid by the worker), the worker may or may not be taxed, depending on whether they have an individual or collective employment contract that addresses this right to stock options. If the benefit is established in the employment contract, taxation will only occur when the worker sells their shares (if there is a higher value), and not when they exercise the option. Otherwise, they will be taxed both when they exercise the option and upon the future sale of the shares (if there is a higher value in either case). It is important that these instruments are addressed from both a tax and labour perspective.

Investors in venture capital rounds typically request that the employee incentive plan be defined by the time the investment is closed. This ensures clear visibility of the fully diluted share capital and helps avoid future surprises regarding ownership stakes. The option pool generally ranges between 5-10%. The dilution resulting from the incentive plan can be absorbed by the founders or by both the founders and investors. Typically, it is the founders who propose the option pool, and the discussion usually focuses not on the need for the option pool itself, but on who will bear the dilution resulting from it.

In Chile, the provisions that establish investors’ rights in the event of an exit or liquidity event are typically included in shareholder agreements. These mainly include pre-emptive rights, tag-along, drag-along, and liquidation preferences. These rules ensure that investors can exit their investment in events such as a trade sale, an initial public offering (IPO), or any other liquidity event. Tag-along rights allow minority investors to participate in the sale if the majority shareholder sells, while drag-along rights compel minority shareholders to sell if the majority shareholder decides to sell. Liquidation preferences ensure that existing shareholders have the right of first refusal to acquire shares from other shareholders who wish to sell.

Additionally, since exits are uncommon in Chile, investors often create funds with longer durations and set longer conversion conditions (eg, in a SAFE). Future investment rounds typically allow investors to sell all or part of their shares to other funds, even when a sale or IPO does not occur. These practices provide greater flexibility for investors in an environment with few liquidity events.

In Chile, IPOs are relatively rare as an exit strategy for start-ups. The path to an IPO is often a longer-term goal rather than an immediate option for early-stage ventures, particularly in the start-up and venture capital sectors.

However, ScaleX (from the Santiago Stock Exchange) allows public offerings that are exempt from the requirement of registration with the Commission for the Financial Market (CMF) of the issuer or securities, in accordance with General Rule No 452. The purpose of this is to facilitate the trading of securities from companies in the expansion stage. This has allowed some start-ups (very few so far) to explore this path, which was previously outright dismissed.

Pre-IPO liquidity in the Chilean ecosystem is still in its early stages but is starting to emerge. These are secondary or structured transactions that allow certain shareholders to sell their stakes in a high-growth start-up before it goes public. Some Chilean start-ups that are expanding internationally (for example, through Delaware structures) may gain access to funds offering secondary liquidity windows. These transactions are generally used to reward early-stage investors, founders, and key team members without having to wait for a full exit. They allow for a cap table reorganisation, facilitating the entry of new investors and retention of talent by providing partial liquidity while maintaining long-term incentives. Common forms include:

• private secondary sales to new investors (such as late-stage funds or family offices);
• buybacks by the company itself, funded through large investment rounds (typically Series C and beyond); and
• structured tender offers, where a lead fund allows some existing shareholders to partially liquidate their stake.

The Securities Market Law (Law No 18.045) distinguishes between public offerings and private offerings of securities. Venture capital investments are typically structured as private offerings, which do not require registration with the CMF’s Securities Register, as long as certain conditions are met (eg, being directed to a limited number of investors without mass advertising). In larger transactions, care must be taken not to exceed the thresholds that would trigger a public offering. On the other hand, the Fintech Law opens the possibility for creating alternative transaction systems that could allow a secondary market for shares, subject to certain restrictions.

The Corporate Law (Law No 18.046) addresses closed joint stock companies, a legal structure that is less common for Chilean start-ups (the most widely used is the SpA (Sociedad por Acciones, or Simplified Stock Corporation)), allowing partners to freely agree on terms through shareholder agreements. However, the issuance of new shares must meet certain legal and statutory requirements, including extraordinary meetings and respecting the pre-emptive rights of existing shareholders unless expressly waived. SpAs (created by Law No 20.190), on the other hand, provide greater flexibility for these and other types of transactions. In any case, the supplementary rule for SpAs will be the regulations concerning S.A.

There are no significant restrictions preventing a foreign VC investor from investing in a local growth-stage company or withdrawing their profits, but there are some regulatory considerations to keep in mind:

• Foreign investors can invest freely in Chile under the foreign investment regime established by Decree Law No 600 (now repealed but still applicable to older investments) or, currently, under the Foreign Investment Statute contained in Law No 20.848.
• Investments do not require prior authorisation, except in strategic or regulated sectors (eg, defence, telecommunications, energy).
• Chile does not impose exchange controls. Foreign currencies can be brought into and withdrawn from the country freely, as long as they comply with Central Bank regulations. The same applies to the profits or earnings generated by these investments. It is important to review the tax implications this may have. Additionally, foreign investors can trade currencies in the formal foreign exchange market.
• There are some specific restrictions in regulated sectors (such as banking, media, defence, or fishing), but these usually do not affect typical VC investments.
• The foreign investor must meet certain tax and legal identification requirements in Chile (eg, having an ID, appointing a legal representative with an address in the country).
• Finally, if the investor channels their investments through entities subject to the UAF (eg, banks, stockbrokers, AGFs, etc), the Chilean entity must apply KYC procedures and report suspicious transactions if applicable.