The main laws and regulations applicable to Mexican banks are as follows.
Laws
Regulations
Authorities
Regarding the supervision authorities of banks, the Ministry of Finance bears the primary supervisory responsibility and is supported by an autonomous agency functionally attached to it, the CNBV, that regulates, among others, banks, broker-dealers and investment funds. Banco de México, in addition to managing its normal central bank operations, also regulates deposit, lending and funding transactions of banks, as well as the foreign exchange and derivatives markets in Mexico.
Two other decentralised public agencies involved with operations of Mexican banks are the Instituto para la Protección al Ahorro Bancario or IPAB, which is in charge of the banking deposit system and of managing a formal deposit insurance system, and the Comisión Nacional para la Protección y Defensa de los Usuarios de Servicios Financiero (the “National Commission for the Defense of Financial Service Users”, or CONDUSEF).
Bank Authorisation Regime in Mexico
Obtaining a banking licence in Mexico is a very complex regulatory processes, governed primarily by the Banking Law and applicable provisions of the CUB. Below is a summary of the key aspects of the authorisation regime.
Authorisation Requirement and Activities Covered
To establish and operate a bank in Mexico, an entity must obtain authorisation from the CNBV, with a favourable opinion from Banco de México. Mexican banks may engage in all activities permitted under the Banking Law or opt to perform only specific transactions. Adjustments to these activities require prior CNBV approval.
Foreign banks cannot establish branches in Mexico for general banking activities, and representative offices are restricted from conducting active banking transactions.
Application Process and Requirements
The application process involves filing an application in triplicate, along with its exhibits, to the CNBV. The documentation must be submitted in Spanish, translated by a certified translator. The timeline for obtaining approval ranges from six to nine months following submission of a complete application. Key steps include:
1. Filing and deposit guarantee:
2. Minimum capital requirements:
3. Incorporation requirements:
4. Operational readiness:
5. Officers and directors:
Approval Process
The process involves two key stages:
1. Favourable opinion (preliminary authorisation):
2. Final authorisation and operational approval:
Restrictions and Ancillary Activities
Licensed banks in Mexico are limited to the scope of activities specified in their authorisation. Any changes require CNBV approval. Ancillary activities, such as providing payment services or offering financial advice, are subject to separate approvals under applicable regulations.
Costs and Engagement With Regulators
The cost of obtaining a banking licence includes the deposit with Banco del Bienestar and operational expenses associated with meeting CNBV’s rigorous requirements. Entities seeking authorisation must maintain active engagement with the CNBV throughout the process to address any regulatory queries or adjustments.
In Mexico, banks are subject to strict regulatory oversight regarding ownership and changes in control, with specific obligations for shareholders to inform or seek authorisation from the CNBV. The requirements vary based on the level of direct or indirect participation in a bank’s capital.
Regulations Governing Changes in Control
1. General obligations during authorisation
During the authorisation process to establish a bank, potential shareholders must provide the CNBV with detailed information about their identity and financial resources.
2. Shareholding disclosure obligations
Once the bank is operational, shareholders – not the bank itself – are responsible for notifying or obtaining approval from the CNBV regarding any acquisitions or transfers of shares, in accordance with the applicable thresholds.
Regulatory Filings and Obligations
Pursuant to Articles 336 and 337 of the General Provisions Applicable to Credit Institutions (CUB), shareholders subject to the thresholds above must submit specific documentation, including identification and financial statements, as part of their notification or authorisation request to the CNBV.
Banks are required to ensure compliance with these obligations by refraining from registering non-compliant share transfers in their shareholder registry. Additionally, banks must notify the CNBV of such unauthorised transfers within five business days of becoming aware of them.
Consequences of Non-Compliance
If shareholders fail to notify or obtain the required authorisations, the equity and corporate rights associated with their shares will be suspended until the CNBV’s authorisation is granted, and all requirements under the Banking Law are fulfilled.
Ongoing Requirements
Shareholders must maintain transparency in their ownership structure and ensure timely compliance with all reporting and approval requirements. Banks are obligated to monitor share transfers and report irregularities to the CNBV, fostering continued regulatory oversight and compliance.
Mexican banks are subject to various corporate governance and regulatory requirements under the Banking Law and the CUB. These requirements aim to ensure sound management, operational efficiency, and compliance with legal and ethical standards.
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
1. Board of directors
2. Organisational structure
While Mexican law does not mandate specific positions or bodies, the CNBV expects certain roles to appear in a bank’s organisational chart. These positions, which support operational and compliance obligations, typically include:
Qualifications for Key Positions
Persons appointed to key roles must meet strict qualifications, including the following.
Diversity and Voluntary Codes
While there are no formal diversity quotas in Mexican banking regulation, the inclusion of independent directors fosters a balance of perspectives on the board. Many banks voluntarily implement diversity and inclusion initiatives to align with global corporate governance trends.
Binding Rules of Conduct
Bank employees are not subject to a formal Bankers’ Oath; however, internal codes of ethics and conduct, often required as part of corporate governance practices, ensure that employees adhere to the highest professional and ethical standards.
Refer to 4.1 Corporate Governance Requirements.
In Mexico, banks are required to implement, maintain, and continuously review a “Remuneration System” that encompasses all forms of compensation, whether monetary or otherwise. These requirements, established under the CUB, aim to align remuneration practices with prudent risk management and long-term stability.
Individuals Subject to the Remuneration Requirements
The Remuneration System applies to all individuals whose roles significantly impact the bank’s risk profile, including members of the board of directors, senior management, and employees in administrative, control, and business units. The system must account for the risks inherent to the activities performed by each role.
Relevant Remuneration Principles
Banks must design their Remuneration Systems based on the following principles.
1. Responsibilities and governance:
2. Policies and risk alignment:
3. Performance and extraordinary remuneration:
4. Flexibility in risk scenarios:
5. Continuous review and disclosure:
Supervisory Approach
The CNBV oversees compliance with remuneration requirements by monitoring disclosures and conducting periodic reviews. Banks must maintain sufficient documentation to demonstrate compliance, ensuring that the Remuneration System aligns with the regulatory framework and supports long-term financial stability.
Mexico’s banking sector is subject to robust anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) regulations under the Banking Law and the Reglas a las Que se Refiere el Artículo 115 de la Ley de Instituciones de Crédito (the “Anti-Money Laundering Rules” or the “AML Rules”).
As a member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT), Mexico adheres to international standards and best practices. Mexican authorities actively co-operate with international counterparts to combat cross-border money laundering and terrorist financing activities.
Key Obligations for Banks
1. Customer identification – verify the identity of customers using reliable, independent source documents, data, or information.
2. Know-Your-Customer (KYC) – collect and maintain detailed information about the customer’s identity, business activities, and the purpose of the account.
3. Enhanced due diligence (EDD) – apply additional scrutiny to high-risk customers, such as politically exposed persons (PEPs) and those from high-risk jurisdictions.
4. Record keeping – banks are required to maintain records of all transactions and customer information for at least ten years. This includes account opening documents, transaction histories, and correspondence.
5. Reporting obligations:
6. Internal controls and compliance programmes – banks must establish and maintain an effective AML/CTF compliance programme, which includes:
Mexico’s depositor protection regime is governed by the Ley de Protección al Ahorro (the “Savings Protection Law” or the “IPAB Law”) which established the Instituto para la Protección al Ahorro Bancario (the IPAB). The IPAB operates as a decentralised federal agency with its own legal personality, assets, and liabilities. Its mission is to safeguard bank savings and manage financial reorganisation programmes for distressed banks.
Administration of the Scheme
The IPAB is overseen by a board of governors composed of seven members: three appointed by the Federal Government and four independent governors approved by the Senate upon the President’s proposal. An Executive Secretary leads the agency’s operations.
Coverage and Limits
The IPAB guarantees the payment of certain deposits and loans made to Mexican banks, up to a maximum of 400,000 UDIs (approximately USD135,000) per individual or corporate depositor across all accounts and loans with the bank. Payments are made within 90 days of the bank being declared in liquidation, suspension of payments, or bankruptcy.
Depositors must submit documentation, such as agreements or account statements, to claim payments. However, certain obligations are excluded from IPAB’s coverage, including the following.
Subrogation and Additional Remedies
When the IPAB makes a payment, it is subrogated into the rights of the depositor or creditor in the relevant insolvency proceedings. Depositors and creditors may seek recovery of amounts exceeding the guaranteed limit through other legal means.
Financial Support for Banks
In exceptional circumstances, the IPAB may provide financial support to distressed banks at its own initiative or at the request of the CNBV. Support measures include the following.
Such assistance is contingent on a cost-benefit analysis confirming that supporting the bank is less expensive than paying the guaranteed obligations. The bank must agree to a financial reorganisation programme, with its voting shares pledged as collateral. If obligations are not met, the IPAB becomes the owner of the pledged shares and assumes control of the bank’s management.
Funding of the Scheme
Mexican banks finance the deposit guarantee scheme through ordinary and extraordinary contributions.
Conclusion
The IPAB plays a vital role in safeguarding depositor funds and maintaining stability in Mexico’s banking system. By guaranteeing deposits and managing distressed banks, it ensures confidence and continuity within the financial sector.
Mexico’s banking regulatory framework is aligned with international standards, including Basel III, as implemented by the CNBV through the CUB, and the Banking Law. Below is a summary of key requirements and regulatory framework.
Basel III Standards and Implementation
Mexico fully adopted Basel III standards through amendments to the Banking Law and the CUB, implemented by the CNBV in co-ordination with Banco de México. These reforms:
The CNBV may impose additional capital requirements or buffers, such as countercyclical buffers, to mitigate risks during economic downturns. While Mexico’s adoption aligns closely with Basel III, the rules allow flexibility, granting the CNBV discretionary power to adapt requirements to local market conditions.
Risk Management Rules
Mexican banks must implement comprehensive risk management frameworks encompassing credit, liquidity, market, operational, and technological risks. Key requirements include the following.
Failure to comply with these standards can lead to CNBV intervention, including imposing corrective measures or limitations on specific activities.
Risk exposures are monitored regularly, and banks must submit risk reports to the CNBV, including data on large exposures, related-party lending, and sectoral concentrations.
Capital Requirements and Buffers
Mexican banks’ capitalisation requirements follow Basel III principles but are tailored for local conditions.
This framework ensures banks maintain robust loss-absorbing capacity while aligning with international standards.
Liquidity Requirements
The amendments to the Banking Law also reinforced liquidity measures. Banks must comply with the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and maintain adequate liquidity buffers to meet short-term obligations. If a bank’s liquidity falls below mandated thresholds:
Additionally, Banco de México supervises compliance with liquidity ratios to ensure resilience during market shocks.
Systemically Important Banks
Systemically important banks (SIBs) are subject to heightened regulations due to their potential impact on the financial system. Requirements include the following.
Conclusion
Mexico’s banking regulation aligns with international standards, ensuring robust capital adequacy, liquidity, and risk management frameworks. These measures enhance financial stability while allowing regulatory flexibility to address local market conditions. For systemically important institutions, stricter requirements ensure their resilience, safeguarding the broader economy.
The Mexican banking system is governed by a robust legal and regulatory framework aimed at maintaining financial stability and protecting depositors. The key elements of this framework include licensing requirements, intervention mechanisms, resolution strategies, and specific insolvency rules.
Mexico’s framework for the insolvency, recovery, and resolution of banks is primarily governed by the Banking Law and the Bank Savings Protection Law (Ley de Protección al Ahorro Bancario, the LPAB), under the supervision of the CNBV and the Instituto para la Protección al Ahorro Bancario (IPAB). These laws provide mechanisms to ensure financial stability and protect depositors during bank failures.
Principal Means of Resolving a Failing Bank
The resolution of a failing bank involves various stages under the Banking Law.
1. Intervention:
2. Revocation of banking licence:
3. Liquidation process:
When a bank faces insolvency or financial instability, the following mechanisms are employed.
1. Recovery plans:
2. Resolution process:
The resolution process includes intervention by the CNBV and measures under the LPAB, such as the following.
3. Deposit insurance and payouts:
Implementation of FSB Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes
Mexico has implemented key elements of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes, including the following.
Insolvency Preference Rules Applicable to Deposits
Under Mexican law, depositors enjoy priority in insolvency proceedings.
Unsecured obligations cease to accrue interest upon liquidation, and derivatives or repurchase transactions are terminated and netted.
Conclusion
Mexico’s legal and regulatory framework aligns closely with international standards, including the FSB Key Attributes. The framework emphasises depositor protection, systemic stability, and orderly resolution, with clear priorities in insolvency proceedings and tools to manage failing banks effectively.
Banking Regulatory Requirements Related to ESG in Mexico
Mexico’s financial sector is undergoing significant regulatory changes to align with global environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards. These adjustments aim to integrate sustainability into financial practices and reflect Mexico’s commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and combating climate change. Below are the key ESG-related banking regulatory requirements currently shaping the sector.
Mexican sustainable taxonomy
Launched in March 2023 by the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit, the sustainable taxonomy is a cornerstone of Mexico’s ESG framework. It serves as a science-based classification tool to identify sustainable economic activities across six sectors.
This taxonomy mandates financial institutions to consider sustainability metrics when funding projects, ensuring they align with climate change adaptation, gender equality, and basic service access objectives.
Sustainable financing mobilisation strategy
Published in September 2023, this strategy is designed to align Mexico’s financial system with sustainability goals. Its three pillars include the following.
The strategy fosters a conducive environment for ESG-compliant financial practices, including low-cost financing for sustainable activities and transparent information disclosure.
Amendments to financial laws
Recent changes to the Securities Market Law and Mutual Funds Law (November 2023) reinforce climate action. These amendments empower the Ministry of Finance to issue provisions for monitoring sustainable development and gender equality within securities markets. This legal framework promotes accountability and transparency among financial institutions.
Sustainability Information Standards (NIS)
In May 2024, the Mexican Council for Financial Information and Sustainability Standards introduced NIS A-1 and B-1.
These standards are harmonised with international frameworks like the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards, ensuring Mexico’s alignment with global practices.
Self-assessment tool for ESG risks
Developed by the CNBV, this tool helps financial institutions evaluate their integration of ESG factors and climate-related risks. Based on global guidelines, it covers:
The tool generates confidential reports for internal use while providing aggregated benchmarks for Mexico’s financial sector.
ESG obligations for pension fund managers
Effective January 2022, Mexican pension fund managers (AFOREs) are required to consider ESG criteria when making investment decisions. This regulation ensures that pension funds contribute to sustainable economic and environmental projects, maximising benefits for the economy and society.
Conclusion
Mexico’s regulatory developments reflect a broader commitment to embedding ESG principles into its financial framework. From the introduction of the sustainable taxonomy to enhanced disclosure standards and tools, the nation is creating a robust environment for sustainable financing. These efforts not only support Mexico’s climate goals but also position its financial sector as a key player in the global transition to a sustainable economy. Financial institutions operating in Mexico must now navigate these regulations to ensure compliance while leveraging opportunities to support environmentally and socially impactful initiatives.
While the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is an EU regulation and does not directly apply in Mexico, certain regulatory frameworks in Mexico address operational resilience, cybersecurity, and third-party risk management in the banking sector, which align with DORA’s objectives.
ICT Risk Management
The CNBV requires financial institutions to implement robust frameworks for managing risks related to information and communication technology (ICT). Banks must establish internal controls, regularly assess vulnerabilities, and adopt measures to mitigate cybersecurity threats as per the CUB.
Incident Reporting
Mexican banks must report significant operational or cybersecurity incidents to the CNBV promptly. This is outlined in Article 168 Bis 16 of CUB, which aims to address and protect operational continuity and cybersecurity, ensuring transparency and timely intervention in the event of disruptions.
Third-Party Risk Management
Financial institutions are obligated to oversee and manage risks associated with third-party service providers, especially those offering ICT services. Regulations require due diligence, regular monitoring, and contractual safeguards to ensure resilience across outsourced operations.
Operational Continuity and Disaster Recovery
Banks in Mexico are required to maintain robust business continuity and disaster recovery plans, aligning with best practices for operational resilience. Testing and periodic updates of these plans are mandatory to ensure preparedness for operational disruptions.
International Standards Influence
While DORA is not directly applicable, Mexican regulators are influenced by global standards and practices, including those of the EU, to maintain international competitiveness and ensure the stability of cross-border banking operations. Mexican banks with EU operations or partnerships are particularly mindful of DORA’s requirements to maintain compliance in those jurisdictions.
These requirements reflect Mexico’s commitment to operational resilience in the financial sector, even though DORA itself does not impose direct obligations. Mexican banks should stay vigilant regarding international developments to ensure alignment where cross-border operations are involved.
Banco de México has published drafts of amendments to Circular 13/2017 and Circular 14/2017 for public consultation, open until 4 December 2025. These drafts propose targeted adjustments to existing provisions, focusing on refining operational requirements, updating thresholds, and enhancing the efficient functioning of payment systems. While subject to further changes, the proposed amendments indicate important regulatory developments for the banking sector in Mexico.
Key Adjustments to Circular 13/2017
This Circular regulates the proper functioning of payment systems, sets requirements for fund transfer services, and establishes obligations for participants. The proposed changes include the following.
1. Increased thresholds:
2. Stricter terms for third-party providers:
3. Exceptions for contract modifications:
Key Adjustments to Circular 14/2017
As the internal rules for SPEI (Sistema de Pagos Electrónicos Interbancarios), this Circular outlines technical and operational requirements for system participants. The proposed changes include:
1. Refined processing times:
2. Enhanced security standards for mobile transactions:
3. Stricter indirect participation requirements:
4. Streamlined notification and reporting obligations:
Conclusion
These amendments are designed to modernise and strengthen the regulatory framework for Mexico’s financial institutions, aligning it with current operational realities and risk management priorities. While the drafts may evolve before final publication, they highlight key areas that banks should monitor closely to ensure compliance and operational readiness.
Av. Pedregal 24
10th floor
Molino del Rey
11040
Mexico City
Mexico
+52 55 9178 7000
contacto@ritch.com.mx www.ritch.com.mxNew Repurchase Agreement (“Repo”) Regulations in Mexico: An Opportunity to Develop the Local Market
Introduction
On 16 May 2024, Banco de México, Mexico’s Central Bank, issued Circular 7/2024 that amended the rules governing repo transactions entered by Mexican financial institutions in Mexico (the Reglas a Las Que Deberán Sujetarse Las Instituciones de Crédito; Casas de Bolsa; Sociedades de Inversión, Sociedades de Inversión Especializadas de Fondos para el Retiro y la Financiera Rural en sus Operaciones de Reporto; the “Reporto Regulations”). This amendment, aimed at modernising Mexico’s repo regulations (known locally as reportos), aligns them with international standards in order to address the evolving needs of the local market. The purpose of these modifications was to foster the local market for repo trough eliminating certain legal barriers that existed, which the authors will explain in detail in this article.
Many market participants welcomed these changes, viewing them as a step toward bringing Mexico’s repo market closer to international practice. According to these participants and Banco de México, almost all repo transactions currently entered in Mexico are intraday, primarily for liquidity purposes. As a result, repos aimed at speculation, credit, or risk management are seldom seen in the country.
However, this contrasts with other data from Banco de México, indicating that government repos – both in the primary market (between other banks and Banco de México) and the secondary market (between banks and other financial entities) – are significant. Mexico is also the second-largest emerging market economy for daily repo transactions, just behind Brazil. This suggests a strong demand for repo activity in Mexico, yet many of these transactions are executed outside the country.
A widely accepted reason for Mexico’s repo market remaining primarily intra-day and conducted offshore is legal restrictions. Despite these limitations, both regulators and market participants have taken gradual steps to promote the Mexican repo market, with Circular 7/2024 being the latest action.
The purpose of this article is to examine:
Repo in Mexico (reportos)
Repo transactions were first introduced into Mexican law in 1932 through the Ley General de Títulos y Operaciones de Crédito (the “Negotiable Instruments Law”). Initially, repos were designed primarily for liquidity management, with a maximum term of 45 days. This restriction was later lifted for financial entities and, more recently, for large corporations. The elimination of this restriction is a clear example of the difficulties that repo transactions have encountered in Mexico to be consolidated as a real option for secured financing, not only for liquidity purposes. Initially repos where only governed by the Negotiable Instruments Law, however, in the 90s, financial authorities realised that it was fundamental to begin to develop a repo market in Mexico, starting with banks. Yet, conceptually, there were certain barriers to overcome.
Firstly, it is important to clarify that a Mexican reporto is not the same as a standard repurchase transaction, although it shares similarities with a sale and buy-back agreement. Under the Negotiable Instruments Law, a reporto involves one party, the Reportador (the “Purchaser”), acquiring ownership of securities from another party, the Reportado (the “Seller”), for a set price (the “Price”). The Seller is obligated to repurchase the same or equivalent securities on a specified date for the Price plus a premium (the “Premium”). In reporto transactions, the Purchaser receives title to the securities, and unless otherwise agreed, any interest or distributions generated by the securities during the reporto period are credited to the Seller.
While reportos and buy/sell back, repo and reverse repo transactions are similar, there are key distinctions: (i) in reporto transactions, the Seller must provide additional collateral (which may be a different type of asset) in certain cases as outlined by the Reporto Regulations; and (ii) local agreements differ in structure, defined terms, payment instructions, delivery of securities, and margin delivery mechanics compared to the GMRA. Notably, the Reporto Regulations permit the application of GMRA margin provisions when dealing with foreign financial institutions. Furthermore, Mexican law imposes additional requirements for the enforceability of collateral located within the country. In a Mexican reporto, the securities transferred by the Seller are not considered collateral. Collateral refers to the additional cash or securities pledged to secure the transaction.
As mentioned, collateral in reporto transactions differs from the underlying security. A reporto is not classified as a secured loan, and the underlying securities are not treated as collateral. Collateral is required when certain risk thresholds are reached, and in transactions lasting more than three business days, margin requirements must be met.
Note that in this article, the authors use reportos and repos interchangeably despite their technical differences.
Reportos are always governed by the Negotiable Instruments Law. Reporto transactions entered by Mexican financial entities such as banks, broker-dealers, pension funds, non-bank financial institutions, insurance companies, bonding companies, and mutual funds, must comply with the Reporto Regulations and be conducted with other financial institutions or institutional investors.
While the Negotiable Instruments Law provides the general legal framework for repo transactions, the Reporto Regulations establish uniform rules regarding contracting conditions, eligible counterparties, the types of securities allowed, early termination rights, and collateral requirements for certain reportos.
One of the main obligations under the Reporto Regulations is that Mexican financial entities such as banks, broker-dealers, pension funds, regulated non-bank banks, insurance companies, bonding companies and mutual funds must use the Contrato Marco para Operaciones de Compraventa de Valores y Reporto (the “Local Reporto Master Agreement”), issued by the Mexican Banks Association (the ABM) and the Mexican Broker Dealers Association (the AMIB), for all repo transactions with other financial institutions or institutional investors. However, Mexican financial institutions may also use international agreements such as the GMRA when transacting with foreign financial institutions. For transactions with individuals or other counterparties not covered by the Reporto Regulations, any mutually agreed master agreement can be used.
Historically, Mexican repos differed from international standards, which led banks to conduct repo transactions through their foreign branches, bypassing the Local Reporto Master Agreement. Some of the limitations included:
These restrictions were addressed in Circular 7/2024.
Banco de México modifications
Through Circular 7/2024, Banco de México introduced several key changes to the Reporto Regulations. These changes were largely expected and are intended to assist market participants in trying to enter into transactions as closely as possible to international standards but using the Local Reporto Master Agreement instead. This should translate into developing the local repo market due to the fact that agreements will be entered in Mexico and local participants such as custodians, teams based in Mexico, and third-party service providers such as lawyers will now be more in demand than before.
a. Substitution and delivery against payment
Mexican financial entities are now permitted to substitute securities during the lifespan of a repo transaction. The repo agreements must specify at least:
Furthermore, the obligation for the Seller to transfer securities against payment by the Buyer is now explicitly required.
b. Termination
The term of a repo, including any extensions, must end at least one banking business day before the maturity of the underlying securities. However, the agreement may allow for securities with a maturity date shorter than the repo’s term, provided the securities are substituted using the process outlined in section “a.”, at least one banking business day prior to the securities’ maturity.
c. Tri-party agency
The Reporto Regulations now allow the use of tri-party agents or custodians for repo securities, limited to Mexican banks or foreign financial institutions from recognised markets (eg, International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) or EU member states). Tri-party agents are authorised to:
However, tri-party agents are prohibited from negotiating repo agreements, securing obligations, covering any failure to comply with agreements, or providing credit or financing to the parties involved in the repo.
d. New counterparties
The new regulations now mandate that Mexican state-owned companies such as Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex) and the Comisión Federal de Electricidad (CFE) must use the Local Reporto Master Agreement and exchange collateral in their repo transactions.
Additionally, non-financial entities with a certain minimum credit rating are also required to use the Local Reporto Master Agreement.
e. New types of repos
Circular 7/2024 introduces new types of repo transactions that can be conducted in Mexico.
i. Open repo
This type of repo has no fixed termination date, and either party can terminate it on any banking business day with prior notice. Open repos must be settled by delivery of securities against payment within 365 days of the agreement. Cash and securities are exchanged only twice – once at the start and once at termination.
ii. Evergreen repo
An evergreen repo also lacks a fixed termination date and can be extended automatically, maintaining the same term as originally agreed. Either party can notify the other of their intention to terminate or extend the repo. In evergreen repos, the exchange of cash and securities occurs only at the start and termination, with no transfer required upon extension.
f. Forward starting repo
Circular 7/2024 sets forth that repos with a delivery date more than four banking business days after the agreement has been entered into will now be classified as derivatives and will require special authorisation from Banco de México.
Comparative analysis: Mexican repos vs international standards and industry actions to align with the GMRA
In both the US and Europe, repo transactions are largely governed by master agreements like the GMRA. While the GMRA and Mexico’s Local Reporto Master Agreement share some similarities, they also have key differences.
(a) Similarities between the GMRA and the Local Reporto Master Agreement
(i) Regulatory authorisations: Both agreements are authorised by Banco de México for use by financial entities. However, as noted, Mexican banks must use the Local Reporto Master Agreement when transacting with Mexican counterparties, while the GMRA is permitted for repos with foreign financial institutions. Under Article 1093 of the Mexican Commerce Code (Código de Comercio), two Mexican parties cannot validly use the GMRA unless there is a foreign connection (eg, foreign accounts).
(ii) Structure: Both agreements serve as master agreements with non-negotiable general terms, supplemented by annexes for specific terms and confirmations. However, in practice, confirmations under the Local Reporto Master Agreement tend to be less sophisticated.
(iii) Industry associations: The GMRA is drafted by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) and the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), while the Local Reporto Master Agreement is drafted by the AMIB and ABM.
(b) Differences between the GMRA and the Local Reporto Master Agreement
(i) Collateral management: The Local Reporto Master Agreement does not provide for margin exchange or net exposure elimination by collateral replacement. It only mandates margin exchange in reportos with a term of three days or more. In contrast, the GMRA allows either party to request a margin transfer to eliminate net exposure at any time. In the GMRA, securities serve as collateral, while in the Local Reporto Master Agreement they are not treated as such.
(ii) Corporate rights and agency transactions: Under the Local Reporto Master Agreement, the Seller retains corporate rights unless otherwise specified. The GMRA does not allow the Seller to exercise these rights unless expressly stated in Annex I. On the other hand, the Local Reporto Master Agreement lacks provisions for agency transactions.
(iii) Events of Default and automatic early termination: The Local Reporto Master Agreement addresses both Events of Default and Termination Events, while the GMRA includes Events of Default and Tax Events. While the Local Reporto Master Agreement does not provide for automatic early termination without notification in the case of insolvency; Section 10(a)(vi) of the GMRA allows for automatic early termination without notice in certain insolvency scenarios.
(iv) Process agent, documents, and jurisdiction: The Local Reporto Master Agreement does not require a process agent for a Mexican counterparty as Mexico is the governing law. Additionally, both agreements require documents like powers of attorney, tax information, and corporate authorisations, but the GMRA also requires a process agent designation in addition to the issuance of a power of attorney. Lastly, while the GMRA prescribes English law and non-exclusive jurisdiction, it often requires modification to exclusive jurisdiction.
(v) Given these differences, Mexican industry associations have initiated a project to update the Local Reporto Master Agreement. This new version aims to incorporate the changes mandated by Circular 7/2024 while aligning more closely with the GMRA. Enhancing the structure of confirmations to accommodate more complex repo transactions is also anticipated.
Conclusion: new opportunities on the horizon
In conclusion, although reportos initially emerged in Mexico as intraday transactions for liquidity purposes, the landscape has evolved. Recent developments, such as Banco de México’s Circular 7/2024 and the ongoing revisions to the Local Reporto Master Agreement, are helping to enhance the Mexican repo market and align it more closely with international standards. Looking ahead, reportos are poised to play a larger role, not only for intraday liquidity but also for more complex transactions.
These new modifications will hopefully translate into a more robust market, creating new opportunities for more market participants to offer repo solutions to their clients, without the legal obstacles that existed for decades. Furthermore, Mexico could lead the way within emerging market economies in the repo market and provide an example on legal reforms that could help to incentivise and develop financial markets.
In the coming months, it will be essential for the associations to finalise the modernisation of the Local Reporto Master Agreement. This will be key to providing a flexible, modern agreement that serves as a viable local alternative to international frameworks like the GMRA.
Av. Pedregal 24
10th floor
Molino del Rey
11040
Mexico City
Mexico
+52 55 9178 7000
contacto@ritch.com.mx www.ritch.com.mx