In the early months of 2025, the Trump administration introduced several changes in US immigration policy, focusing on border and interior enforcement. These measures include more limited visa renewal interview waivers, the reintroduction of stricter screening and vetting procedures for foreign nationals, updates to alien registration requirements, actions to end or limit parole programmes and certain Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations, and a proposal to limit birthright citizenship for children born in the US if neither the father nor mother is a US citizen or green card holder. Some of these measures have faced legal challenges, with litigation ongoing. As these developments demonstrate, immigration policy remains highly dynamic, and additional changes will be announced throughout the year.
Under an Executive Order issued on 20 January 2025, immigration agencies were directed to identify countries for potential travel bans or other restrictions. On 4 June 2025, the Trump administration announced travel restrictions affecting nationals of several countries.
Ongoing Litigation Cases
Several immigration-related policies have faced legal challenges, with litigation ongoing in key cases. These include lawsuits over the USCIS fee rule, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) programme, categorical parole programmes for certain countries, Temporary Protected Status designations, and the Executive Order on birthright citizenship.
2025 Regulatory Agenda
In January 2025, regulations created under the Biden administration related to the H-1B visa and other temporary visas went into effect. For H-1B visas, this:
Beyond H-1B visas, these regulations also codified the practice of USCIS granting deference to previous approvals when there has not been a change in the facts, extending cap-gap work authorisation to qualified F-1 students selected in the annual H-1B cap through April 1st of the following year.
At the time of writing, the Trump administration has not published its regulatory agenda, but is expected to do so in the coming months.
The most common forms of employment-based temporary work visas and green card categories for corporate purposes in the USA are outlined below.
Employment-Based Temporary Visas
H-1B Visa specialty occupation
The H-1B Visa classification applies to jobs in a “specialty occupation”, which requires the theoretical and practical application of highly specialised knowledge. Typically, this entails the completion of a specific course of higher education relevant to the job. For certain individuals with specialised skills and considerable work experience that shows a progressive increase in responsibility, equivalency evaluations can be obtained to meet the educational requirements. The H-1B Visa is subject to an annual quota, which is detailed below, and certain DOL requirements regarding wages and working conditions.
L-1 Visa intracompany transfers
The L-1 Visa classification applies to intracompany transferees who, within the three years preceding entry to the USA, have been employed outside of the USA continuously for at least one year in a managerial, executive, or specialised knowledge capacity, and who will be employed by a branch, parent, affiliate, or subsidiary of that same employer in the USA in a managerial, executive, or specialised knowledge capacity. Employees who will be working in the USA in a specialised knowledge role will receive L-1B status. Employees who will be working in the USA in a managerial or executive role will receive L-1A status.
O-1 Visa extraordinary ability/achievement
The O-1 Visa classification applies to individuals with an extraordinary ability in the sciences, education, business, athletics, or the arts, or a demonstrated record of extraordinary achievement in the motion picture or television industry. Generally, O-1 applicants will be required to prove that they have extraordinary talent and skill or extraordinary achievement, and that they are renowned in their field.
Country-specific non-immigrant visas
Citizens of Australia, Canada, Chile, Mexico, and Singapore may have additional work and training visa options (eg, the TN, E-3, and H-1B1 Visas).
Employment-Based Immigrant Classifications (Green Cards)
There are five employment-based immigrant preference categories that lead to permanent residence in the US. The three most common are outlined below.
EB-1
Three types of foreign nationals may qualify for the EB-1 or First Preference category:
EB-2
Foreign nationals may qualify for the EB-2 Second Preference category on the basis of their i) advanced degree; or ii) exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business. This category typically requires a job offer from an employer and a PERM Labor Certification from the DOL, but this requirement can be waived for foreign nationals who qualify for a National Interest Waiver (NIW).
EB-3
Foreign nationals may qualify for the EB-3 Third Preference category under the following three types of circumstances: i) skilled workers; ii) professionals; and iii) unskilled workers (other workers).
The main unsponsored non-immigrant and immigrant work and investment visas are outlined below.
E-1 Treaty Trader
The E-1 Visa classification applies to nationals of a treaty country with which the USA maintains ties of navigation and commerce. The individual must be an executive, manager, or specialist in a treaty-nation company where that individual owns at least half of the company, or at least 50% of the company is owned by nationals of the treaty country. Certain employees of a qualifying treaty-nation company may also qualify for E-1 Visa classification.
E-2 Visa Treaty Investor
The E-2 Visa classification applies to nationals of a treaty country with which the USA maintains ties of navigation and commerce. The individual must have invested, or be actively in the process of investing, a substantial amount of capital in a real and operating commercial enterprise in the USA. The proffered position in the USA must be an executive/supervisory position or require skills essential to the company’s operations in the USA. Certain employees of a treaty investor may also qualify for an E-2 Visa.
EB-5 Visa Immigrant Investor
The main investment immigrant visa is the EB-5 classification. There are two primary requirements to qualify for the EB-5 Fifth Preference category: i) making the necessary investment of capital in a commercial enterprise in the US; and ii) planning to create or preserve the required full-time jobs for qualified US workers.
Unsponsored Work Immigration Routes
For unsponsored work immigration routes, certain qualifying foreign nationals are eligible to file a Form I-140 (Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker) on their behalf as a “self-petitioner” without an offer of employment from a US employer. This type of green card process is referred to as “self-sponsorship”. The following employment-based preference categories allow foreign nationals to file their own Form I-140:
Other Options
USCIS has published online resources to provide an overview of some of the temporary and permanent pathways (including the International Entrepreneur Rule) for non-citizen entrepreneurs to work in the USA.
A visitor may participate in limited activities of short duration as authorised by US immigration authorities. Business visitors enter the USA either on a B-1/B-2 Visitor Visa or under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP).
The VWP permits foreign nationals to conduct qualifying business activities for up to 90 days without obtaining a B-1/B-2 Visitor Visa at a US embassy or consulate, provided they are eligible citizens of a qualifying country. Visitors who are citizens of Canada or Bermuda, Bahamian nationals or British subjects in certain islands are not required to have a visa to travel as a visitor.
The following are examples of permissible activities for a business visitor:
If an activity requires work authorisation, entering the USA as a business visitor is generally not permitted.
Foreign nationals travelling to the USA under the VWP must have an approved Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA). Business visitors not eligible for the VWP must generally obtain a B-1/B-2 Visitor Visa prior to travel by submitting an application to a US Embassy/Consulate.
ESTA is not considered a visa but serves as an entry requirement under the VWP. Similar to a visa, ESTA approval does not guarantee admission to the USA. It allows an individual to board a carrier for travel to the US under the VWP. Dual nationals of certain countries and individuals who have travelled to specific countries during certain time periods may be ineligible for ESTA and will be required to obtain a B-1/B-2 Visitor Visa prior to travel.
It is not possible to work remotely in the USA for an employer located abroad without work authorisation. The USA does not currently have a specific visa category for digital nomads. Business visitors are generally prohibited from engaging in productive work activities and must remain on foreign payroll.
Language requirements may apply to certain US non-immigrant classifications. Foreign nationals who plan to apply for an F-1 or M-1 visa must be proficient in English or be enrolled in courses leading to English proficiency. J-1 applicants must be proficient in English.
Additionally, to be eligible for naturalisation, foreign nationals must undergo a naturalisation test to demonstrate that they are able to read, write, and speak basic English.
When applying to become a lawful permanent resident (LPR) through an Adjustment of Status (AOS) application in-country or through the consular process for an immigrant visa to enter the USA as an LPR, a foreign national generally must provide a medical examination confirming their eligibility. As part of the medical exam, the doctor will check the foreign national’s vaccination records and ensure that the applicant has received all required vaccines for preventable diseases. The complete list of vaccinations needed can be found on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website.
Some temporary travellers may also require a medical exam at the consular officer’s discretion or based on US immigration policy, such as the requirement that visa applicants be referred to a panel physician for medical testing if they have a single alcohol-related arrest or conviction within the last five years, or if there are two or more alcohol-related arrests or convictions within the last ten years, or if there is any other evidence to suggest an alcohol problem.
Salary and qualification requirements for the most common corporate non-immigrant and immigrant visas (green cards) in the USA are outlined below.
Employment-Based Temporary Visas
Country-Specific Non-Immigrant Visas
Employment-Based Immigrant Classifications (Green Cards)
Before an employer can sponsor a foreign national for a green card in certain employment-based immigrant preference classifications, the employer must conduct a bona fide, good-faith test of the US labour market to demonstrate that there are no willing, able, and available US workers who qualify for the role.
In general, an individual can work only for the employer for which they received the visa, but may obtain authorisation to work for a different or additional employer in some circumstances.
An H-1B employee may change employers; however, the new employer must first sponsor the employee’s new work authorisation by filing a petition with USCIS before the employee begins working for the new employer.
An O-1 employee may change employers with prior approval. The new employer must file Form I-129 with USCIS.
TN, E-3, and H-1B1 employees may also change employers with prior approval. Please note that E-1 and E-2 Visa holders may only change to an employer meeting the treaty requirements.
L Visa holders cannot change employers unless the new employer meets the corporate relationship requirements of the L-1 classification. Depending on the case, prior approval may be required.
USCIS may conduct criminal background checks from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and other DHS or interagency security checks for any individual applying for immigration or naturalisation benefits or requests.
The Trump administration’s focus on immigration enforcement has led to enhanced vetting and screening on visa and benefit applicants, including criminal background checks.
When applying for either a non-immigrant or immigrant visa at a US Embassy or Consulate, the Department of State may conduct similar background checks prior to issuing a visa.
The need for police clearance certificates depends on the specific visa category and immigration benefit requested.
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) specifies various “grounds for inadmissibility”, that may render a foreign national ineligible to enter the US or obtain a visa outside the US or obtain certain benefits while in the US. These grounds include health-related concerns, immigration law violations, certain criminal or security offences, and other specified factors. Individuals deemed ineligible under these provisions may seek waivers addressing specific grounds of inadmissibility by presenting evidence to justify an exception.
Financial requirements for US immigration and non-immigration processes vary significantly based on the classification of the visa or petition. Certain employment-based non-immigrant and immigrant classifications may require employers to demonstrate their ability to meet specific salary requirements. Business visitors who apply for a B-1/B-2 Visitor Visa at a US Embassy or Consulate and certain other temporary visa applicants may be required to demonstrate their ability to pay for all costs of their trip as part of their application.
For US visa applications and petitions, the filing method can be either paper-based or electronic, depending on the type of application or petition and the relevant authority/agency. Certain applications, such as Form I-765 (Application for Employment Authorization), can be filed online via the USCIS online portal. This platform allows applicants to submit forms electronically and upload supporting documents directly.
Certain applications continue to require submission in paper format. Applicants may be required to send completed forms and supporting documentation to the appropriate USCIS location or US Embassy or Consulate.
Applicants are generally required to file their visa applications at the US Embassy or Consulate in their country of residence or citizenship. Under certain circumstances, foreign nationals may qualify to apply for a visa at a US Embassy or Consulate in a “third country” where they do not hold residence or citizenship. This is subject to the US Embassy or Consulate’s discretion.
In certain circumstances, US Embassies or Consulates may accept jurisdiction for processing a visa application if the applicant demonstrates genuine hardship in returning to their previous country of residence. Such difficulties could include situations like ongoing conflict, widespread instability, or other compelling hardships. Additionally, individuals residing in countries where visa services are unavailable or severely limited, where the US does not have a consular presence, or where political or security issues pose serious risks to operations, may have their applications handled at an assigned processing location.
Visa processing times vary. The length of time it takes for USCIS to process a petition or the Department of State to process a visa application after they receive it depends on several factors. USCIS’s website publishes general processing times based on the type of petition or application and the Field Office or Service Center location adjudicating the petition or application.
The Department of State’s National Visa Center (NVC) and Kentucky Consular Center (KCC) do not adjudicate visa applications, but have a role within the Department of State’s process. Processing times for the NVC can be found on their website. Wait times for appointments for visa applications filed at a US embassy or consulate abroad can be found on the Department of State’s website. In addition, for post-specific information about visa processing, applicants may consult the appropriate US embassy or consulate website for the most up-to-date information regarding visa processing, appointment availability, and requirements for expedited requests.
There may be travel restrictions while an immigration application is pending, or even after an application or visa has been issued, that travellers should be aware of. Generally, information about such restrictions is available on USCIS’s website, the Department of State’s website, or the website of the embassy or consulate where the application was filed.
Applicants applying from abroad must generally first obtain a visa through a US embassy or consulate before travelling to and entering the USA. Citizens of Canada or Bermuda, Bahamian nationals or British subjects in certain islands may not require a visa to enter the USA and may apply to enter the USA directly at the port of entry.
Individuals in the USA submitting applications/petitions through USCIS may not be able to travel while their application is pending. It is recommended to seek immigration counsel in order to determine if international travel might be possible, depending on the case.
For those with pending green card petitions with USCIS, travel authorisation may be required. A travel permit must generally be obtained prior to travel, or the application can be denied.
Visa processing in the USA may involve multiple government agencies and application processes, for which processing times may vary.
USCIS premium processing is available for certain petitions or applications. An additional fee must be paid on top of the normal application costs. Please note that premium processing may be temporarily suspended at the discretion of USCIS at any time. Additional information about who is eligible for premium processing and specific premium processing times is available on the USCIS website.
USCIS may also expedite certain cases based on severe financial loss, emergencies and humanitarian reasons, and other limited reasons.
Visa application processing at US embassies and consulates abroad cannot generally be expedited. Individuals with urgent travel needs may request an expedited visa interview appointment by following the expedite request instructions for the US embassy or consulate where the application is filed. Expedites are limited and are typically reserved for emergencies. Applicants are required to provide a written justification of their need for urgent travel.
There are no post-visa requirements or steps for an applicant to complete. However, they should be mindful of their Form I-94 (denotes authorised period of stay) to determine if an extension is required so that they remain compliant with immigration laws. As Customs and Border Protection (CBP) no longer issues admission stamps in passports, foreign nationals should retrieve their online I-94 from the CBP website after every entry to ensure the information is correct.
Foreign nationals should also be mindful of their visa expiration date, as the visa can only be used to seek admission to the USA during the period the visa is valid. The visa expiration date does not dictate how long an individual may stay in the USA; the Form I-94 does.
Foreign nationals in the USA must report a change of address to the government within ten days of moving. This requirement applies to individuals in the USA on a temporary status (ie, non-immigrants) and individuals who hold a green card (ie, lawful permanent residents). More information on how to notify USCIS of the change of address can be found here.
Foreign nationals who will remain in the USA for 30 or more days are required to be registered with the government within that timeframe. Many foreign nationals will already be registered. This includes, but is not limited to, individuals who have received a Form I-94 or been issued a non-immigrant visa before travelling to the USA. Foreign nationals who turn 14 while in the US are required to re-register within 30 days of their 14th birthday.
Foreign nationals 18 years and older are required to carry acceptable documentation showing their registration at all times.
The cost of sponsoring an employment visa in the USA varies greatly depending on the visa classification and whether the application is submitted in the USA or abroad. Visa fees for non-immigrant (temporary) and immigrant (green card) visas can be found here.
USCIS significantly raised filing fees for immigration benefit requests for most high-skilled classifications, effective 1 April 2024. The rule imposed significant costs on employers.
Depending on the non-immigrant or immigrant (green card) visa classification, the sponsoring employer is responsible for certain costs. For example, the Department of Labor regulations expressly prohibit an employee from paying for or contributing to any fees and costs associated with the PERM Labor Certification application process. Certain costs may be paid by the foreign employee, such as the cost of obtaining required documents or any fees associated with the translation of documents. It is recommended to seek immigration counsel for further guidance on the costs of a particular visa application and obligations.
Fines and penalties vary among the different federal government agencies tasked with enforcing immigration laws. For example, non-compliance monetary fines for Form I-9 paperwork violations run from USD288 to USD2,861 per violation. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as well as the Department of Justice’s Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (DOJ IER) have the authority to issue civil penalties for failing to comply with Form I-9 employment verification requirements.
Committing or participating in document fraud for satisfying a requirement or benefit of the employment verification process or the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), knowingly hiring unauthorised workers, committing document abuse, and unlawful discrimination against an employment-authorised individual in hiring, firing, or recruitment, or referral for a fee can give rise to fines and even criminal liability.
The DOL may assess civil monetary penalties specific to the record-keeping requirements related to Labor Condition Applications (LCA) and the related Public Access File (PAF). Specifically, government regulations provide that DOL may assess penalties for violating requirements related to public access where the violation impedes the ability of the DOL to determine whether a violation has occurred or the ability of members of the public to have the information needed to file a complaint.
Additionally, information contained in or missing from the Public Access File could lead the DOL to assess civil monetary penalties for other violations of the DOL regulations (eg, the DOL could identify a deficiency in the PAF that then leads to an investigation regarding other H-1B obligations). The following are the most common violations enforced by the DOL:
Monetary penalties for these violations are steep and can rise to the level of disqualification from filing immigration petitions with USCIS. Outside the formal enforcement scheme, the agencies responsible for determining eligibility for immigration benefits and visas, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of State (DOS), also drive compliance with the legal requirements through adjudications. The agencies may apply increased scrutiny to a company’s H-1B and other immigration filings, leading to adjudication delays and workforce disruptions.
The government can also pursue criminal investigations related to immigration sponsorship. The False Claims Act prohibits knowingly making false claims to the government, and imposes significant monetary penalties on violators. A separate provision of federal law prohibits knowingly making under oath, or under penalty of perjury, knowingly subscribing as true, any false statement with respect to a material fact in any application, affidavit, or other document required by the immigration laws or regulations, or knowingly presenting any such application, affidavit, or other document which contains any such false statement or which fails to contain any reasonable basis in law or fact. A violation of this provision is punishable by a fine or imprisonment for up to ten years, or both, depending on the circumstances. The Department of Justice (DOJ) routinely publishes announcements of settlement agreements with companies that result from such investigations.
The INA also imposes severe immigration-related penalties for fraud or misrepresentation when seeking an immigration benefit. An individual found to have committed fraud or misrepresentation is subject to a permanent bar on admission to the United States. A misrepresentation can be characterised as material: (i) if the foreign national was inadmissible on the true facts; or (ii) if the misrepresentation tended to shut off a line of inquiry that was relevant to the individual’s eligibility and that line of inquiry might have resulted in a proper determination that the alien not be admitted.
Employer obligations in the USA for some of the most common corporate non-immigrant and immigrant (green card) visas in the USA include but are not limited to:
For information regarding penalties for non-compliance, please refer to 6.1 Enforcement Action.
Under US law, all US employers must conduct employment eligibility verification for every person hired in the USA if they will work for pay or other type of remuneration. Employers must conduct employment eligibility verification by completing and retaining Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, as required by law. This applies regardless of an employee’s citizenship, immigration status, or national origin. Specific exceptions may apply for completing and retaining Form I-9. Employers must complete the Form I-9 for each worker (including foreign nationals) who begins employment in the USA after 6 November 1986, including workers who remain on foreign payroll. Employers must generally reverify employment authorisation documentation for all employees whose authorisation is expiring to ensure that the employee is still authorised to work, although there are exceptions. The employment verification process in the USA is complex, and employers risk both civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance.
Most visa types allow for certain dependant family members, but which family members qualify for a visa may vary.
Certain family members of foreign nationals may obtain non-immigrant or immigrant (green card) visas or status based on their relationship with the foreign national. The foreign national is known as the “principal” non-immigrant, and the qualifying family members are known as the “dependant” or “derivative” non-immigrants.
Dependants are typically limited to the principal’s spouse (opposite or same-sex marriages) or unmarried children under the age of 21. Dependants may seek admission to the USA for the same duration as the principal’s stay. Domestic partners (opposite or same-sex), such as those in a civil union, may qualify for a B-2 Visitor Visa to accompany a principal to whom they are not legally married.
An immigrant visa (green card) may also be available to other family members, such as a son or daughter over 21, or the parents and siblings of US citizens. These family members are not typically considered “dependants” but may have a path to obtain a green card.
Only certain non-immigrant classifications allow the family members (also known as “dependants” or “derivatives”) to work in the USA.
Depending on the non-immigrant classification family members may be required to apply for and receive employment authorisation in the form of an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) from USCIS before they are eligible to accept employment in the USA.
Dependant family members must also comply with state and federal laws regarding employment, such as child labour laws that prohibit the employment of individuals below a certain age.
Individuals who receive lawful permanent resident status (a “green card”) are work authorised.
2400 N Glenville Drive
Building A
Richardson, TX 75082
USA
+1 469 290 9266
+1 571 422 2905
mfunk@bal.com www.bal.comAn Update on US Employment-Based Permanent Residence Strategies during the First Year of Trump 2.0
Last year, in July 2024, we authored an article titled “The Emerald Age of EB-2 NIW”, discussing the attractiveness of the EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW) green card category. Historically, EB-2 NIW was a relatively obscure immigration pathway, but several developments in 2022 and 2023 pushed many green card seekers (and employers) toward this category in 2024.
EB-2 NIW cases are subject to a precedent decision of the Administrative Appeals Office called Matter of Dhanasar, 26, I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016). The Dhanasar case created a three-prong test on whether a person is eligible for an NIW approval.
By 2022, post-pandemic, the traditional employer-sponsored green card process, PERM labour certification, administered by the US Department of labour, had become almost prohibitively slow (and sadly, it is even slower now).
Further, many high-profile employers nationwide were going through post-pandemic layoffs, which, for technical reasons, complicated the ability of those employers to complete the required PERM labour market test.
And at the same time that the PERM process became less attractive, USCIS under the Biden Administration had taken steps to promote EB-2 NIW as a positive alternative. These two forces – the increasing difficulty of PERM and the increasing attractiveness of EB-2 NIW – led to an unprecedented increase in EB-2 NIW filings:
So, it seemed word got out about EB-2 NIW (perhaps with too many people reading our article), and by the second half of calendar year 2024, USCIS started to move the goalposts.
The End of the Emerald Age
Sadly, as of the time of this writing in May 2025, it seems the Emerald Age of EB-2 NIW has ended. Since about August 2024, attorneys nationwide have been reporting a significant uptick in Requests for Evidence (RFEs) and denials of EB-2 NIW petitions, particularly for those cases filed via premium processing. It appears that USCIS, faced with tripled NIW petition numbers, has grown overwhelmed and more hostile toward the category, resulting in frequent “boilerplate” RFEs and even boilerplate denials in which the adjudicating officer does not appear to review submitted evidence in any meaningful way.
This shift began in the summer and fall of 2024, under the Biden Administration. Then, on 15 January 2025, in literally the last week of the Biden Administration, USCIS issued a Policy Alert describing new changes to NIW adjudications that make clear USCIS will be subjecting cases to a more challenging standard. The January 2025 Policy Alert therefore memorialised what at least some adjudicators within USCIS had already been doing for months.
The January 2025 Policy Alert on NIW shows that USCIS has become more restrictive particularly when assessing the “national importance” element of Dhanasar Prong 1. In the January 2025 Policy Alert, USCIS articulates its scepticism that a candidate’s endeavour for a private sector employer (as opposed to a university or government employer) can have national importance.
USCIS adjudicators now fixate on the concept of “private benefit” even when there is substantial evidence that the impact of the proposed endeavour extends beyond the employer and its direct customers/clients.
The January 2025 Policy Alert on NIW articulates an especially strong hostility toward NIW petitions for IT and software professionals, stating:
“A software engineer adapting their employer’s code for various clients will have difficulty demonstrating the national importance of that endeavor, absent additional broader impacts supported by specific evidence.”
Our experience now, which is supported by experiences of other attorneys, is that candidates working in software, IT or cybersecurity face an insurmountable uphill battle for EB-2 NIW. To reinforce this point, the Trump White House has removed the Critical and Emerging Technologies (CET) list that was prominently part of the EB-2 NIW innovations made by the Biden Administration in 2022 and 2023.
To be clear, while IT/software professionals and engineers of various sorts face headwinds, candidates in other industries and engaged in other domain expertise, including pharmaceutical development (even in the private sector), appear to continue to benefit from a more favourable consideration of Dhanasar Prong 1. The January 2025 Policy Alert on EB-2 NIW specifically highlights:
“A person developing a drug for a pharmaceutical company may establish national importance by demonstrating the prospective public health benefits of the drug, instead of solely projecting the profits that will accrue to the employer.”
The January 2025 Policy Alert’s favourable statements about drug development have extended to EB-2 NIW approvals for those involved in quality assurance and regulatory affairs at pharmaceutical and life sciences and medical device companies.
Overall, traditional research-based NIW cases, which were successful even pre-Dhanasar, appear to remain viable, but the cases now that avoid RFEs via premium processing are generally for a candidate who has published several peer-reviewed articles that are well-cited, and has otherwise engaged in academically oriented activities (like peer review). It also continues to be helpful when a candidate is engaged in work directly supporting a US government agency. Letters of support on federal government agency letterhead are definitely given strong weight.
As we write, in May 2025, there can be no question that USCIS has retrenched from the advances promoted in 2022 and 2023 and now adjudicators are often citing pre-Dhanasar standards, including an expectation of prior significant contributions to the field.
The January 2025 Policy Alert on NIW does state that if the foreign national leads research that (i) impacts the development of similar technology by other employers, (ii) results in widespread adoption or licensing, or (iii) introduces novel and important manufacturing processes, the case may satisfy Dhanasar Prong 1. But a practical difficulty occurs in that USCIS typically requires independent evidence that exists outside of the immigration context. Identifying and obtaining such evidence often proves challenging. In an ideal case, the evidence would include internal company work product by the candidate and perhaps a letter from a manager explaining the significance of the work product; but many employers will restrict access to this kind of important and persuasive evidence.
Alternatives to NIW and PERM
While the shortcut strategy of EB-2 NIW has bogged down, and seems likely to stay bogged down in the months (and years?) ahead, things have not improved with PERM labour certification.
Because of the challenges of both EB-2 NIW and PERM labour certification, and the slow movement of cut-off dates on the Visa Bulletin, some individuals (and employers) are just going “all in” with an EB-1 filing.
EB-1A
EB-1A does not necessarily require employer sponsorship. Because of the availability of self-petitioning, the possibility of premium processing, and favourable consideration with the Visa Bulletin cut-off dates, many candidates have an extreme interest in EB-1A. However, the EB-1A category remains a very high standard that most candidates cannot meet, particularly because USCIS continues to use idiosyncratic interpretations of EB-1 regulatory criteria that often trip up the uninitiated.
Many who seek EB-1A believe success only requires satisfying three of the ten regulatory criteria enumerated at 8 CFR § 204.5(h)(3), without recognising that meeting three of ten criteria are table stakes, and the real challenge is the “Final Merits Assessment” as outlined in Kazarian v USCIS, 596 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010).
The Kazarian final merits assessment means the adjudicator is permitted to evaluate the totality of the evidence to determine whether the beneficiary meets the high level of expertise required for this classification. The final merits determination is highly subjective and there appears to be a wide range of attitudes among adjudicators.
In an EB-1A final merits assessment, USCIS determines whether the candidate “is one of that small percentage who has risen to the very top of the field of endeavor” (USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2). Thus, EB-1A cases demand evidence that the candidate is truly among the best in their field, which, by definition, means most people do not qualify for EB-1A.
In October 2024, under the Biden Administration, USCIS issued policy guidance modestly improving and clarifying EB-1A adjudication standards.
EB-1B
USCIS statistics suggest a very high percentage of EB-1B employer-sponsored I-140 petitions are approved; however, unlike EB-2 NIW and EB-1A, EB-1B does require employer sponsorship. The rules permit candidates to pay for any costs associated with an EB-1B petition (including attorney fees for preparing the case), but EB-1B I-140 petition forms and generally at least one support letter must be signed by a qualifying representative of the petitioning employer.
While EB-1B is explicitly reserved for professors or researchers, the USCIS interpretation of who constitutes a “researcher” has been historically and continues to be somewhat liberally interpreted, meaning a relatively wide range of professionals working in a variety of technical areas and domains could seek EB-1B, including people working in product development, engineering, or other ancillary roles. EB-1B is not simply for R&D scientists working in laboratories.
For candidates considering EB-1B and working for private employers (as opposed to a university), the EB-1B regulations require that the sponsoring employer (petitioner) employ “at least three persons full-time in research activities” and must have “documented accomplishments in an academic field” (8 CFR § 204.5(i)(3)(iii)). These regulatory requirements might limit the availability of EB-1B to those working at smaller start-ups.
An EB-1B candidate must satisfy two out of six regulatory criteria (rather than three out of ten, as in EB-1A), and EB-1B candidates must also survive the highly subjective Kazarian “final merits assessment”.
“Tactical” EB-2 NIW
A final strategy to be mentioned is the “tactical” EB-2 NIW, a term invented by our firm to refer to non-frivolous EB-2 NIW cases that are filed to seek additional H-1B time. These are filings for candidates in H-1B status in their fifth year of H-1B time where there is simply not enough time to proceed on PERM. The H-1B rules allow for extensions of H-1B status in 12-month increments beyond the normal six-year limit if an EB-2 NIW I-140 has been filed and has been pending 365 days, including any appeal to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). Therefore, a tactical EB-2 NIW case is generally filed via regular, non-premium processing and if the case is denied, it is appealed to the AAO, allowing the candidate to extend H-1B time and hopefully allowing for the employer to proceed on PERM.
Final Thoughts on EB Green Cards in Year One of Trump 2.0
As noted at the start of this article, the January 2025 Policy Alert from USCIS regarding EB-2 NIW has re-calibrated the adjudication standards for EB-2 NIW such that a narrower band of candidates is eligible for EB-2 NIW. It is important to consider both the occupation and the domain/industry of a candidate to assess viability.
Employers who were able to use EB-2 NIW in 2022 or 2023 successfully and candidates who have friends that were approved for EB-2 NIW in 2022 or 2023 should brace for the fact that what worked at one point in history may not work now.
For candidates working in what increasingly feels like favored industries (eg, pharmaceutical, life sciences, medicine, biotech, medical devices), USCIS is still approving a wide range of EB-2 NIW cases.
For candidates in IT and software, the long slog of PERM labour certification may be the only viable route, for now; although a tactical EB-2 NIW filing may be useful in extending H-1B time until a PERM approval can be achieved.
9800 Shelard Parkway, #335
Plymouth
MN 55441
USA
+1 507 400 7405
bob@webberimmigration.com www.webberimmigration.com