The medical device market in Poland is primarily regulated by EU regulations, which create a uniform system of requirements for safety, quality and supervision within the European Union. Two regulations of the European Parliament and of the Council are of key importance: Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) on medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) on in vitro diagnostic medical devices, which the Republic of Poland, as an EU member state, applies directly.
The above regulations are supplemented by national provisions on medical devices. With regard to specific aspects that are not regulated by the main act, implementing acts have been issued – regulations of the Minister of Health. In addition, medical devices are also subject to other national regulations, including provisions on reimbursement and medicinal products.
In practice, it is also necessary to monitor the announcements of the President of the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products (hereinafter also referred to as the President of the Office) on a continuous basis in order to stay up to date with the supervisory authority’s interpretative positions.
Below is a detailed list of legal acts relating directly and indirectly to medical devices.
Legal Acts Directly Relating to Medical Devices
Legal acts directly regulating the manufacturing, placing on the market, making available, surveillance and advertising of medical devices are as follows.
Legal Acts Relating to Other Product Groups That May Apply to Medical Devices
The following legal acts, although relating to other product groups, may also apply to medical devices:
Legal Acts Indirectly Applicable to Medical Devices
The following legal acts, although not directly related to medical devices, are of significant importance for the economic activity of entities operating in this sector.
Polish regulations do not provide for separate provisions for medical instruments.
Cosmetics
The basic sectoral regulations concerning cosmetics in Poland are primarily based on harmonised EU law. The key legal act is Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 on cosmetic products, which comprehensively regulates issues related to the safety, composition and surveillance of cosmetics. In addition, on 4 October 2018, the Polish legislature adopted the Act on Cosmetic Products, which supplements the provisions of the Regulation in areas left to be regulated at national level, resulting from the exclusive competence of member states, including the organisation and functioning of supervisory authorities, control procedures, the imposition of administrative sanctions and national requirements for reporting undesirable effects.
Biocides
This area is also subject to uniform EU regulations set out in Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of 22 May 2012 concerning the placing on the market and use of biocidal products, which establishes a legal framework for the introduction and marketing of biocidal products on the European market. These are supplemented in Poland by the Act of 9 October 2015 on biocidal products.
Food and nutrition supplements
In Poland, food and nutrition supplements are primarily subject to harmonised EU law, which is supplemented by national provisions on notification, control and sanctions. At national level, the basic act is the Act of 25 August 2006 on food and nutrition safety, which implements EU regulations, specifies the procedure for notifying the Chief Sanitary Inspector of the first placing of a supplement on the market, the competence of the control authorities and the procedure for imposing sanctions. It is supplemented by regulations of the Minister of Health concerning, among other things, the list of permitted enriching substances, detailed composition requirements and notification templates to the supervisory authority.
Pharmaceuticals and Blood Products
The Act of 6 September 2001 – Pharmaceutical Law regulates the manufacture, import, placing on the market, marketing authorisation, advertising and surveillance of medicinal products.
The Act of 1 July 2005 on the collection, storage and transplantation of cells, tissues and organs sets out the rules for the procurement, storage, processing and use of cells, tissues and organs, including advanced therapy medicinal products. This Act also applies to stem cells.
The Act of 22 August 1997 on public blood services regulates the organisation of blood donation, the safety of blood and blood products, and the rules for their use.
The Reimbursement Act of 12 May 2011 on medicines, foodstuffs for particular nutritional uses and medical devices lays down the rules for financing medicines from the state budget under the health care system.
The Act of 9 March 2023 on Clinical Trials of Medicinal Products for Human Use specifies in particular the procedure for granting authorisation for clinical trials, the rules and procedure for ethical evaluation of clinical trials, the obligations of the sponsor, principal investigator and investigator, and the rules on civil and criminal liability of the investigator and sponsor.
Of key importance in the medicinal products sector are the regulations of the Minister of Health, which specify, among other things, clinical trial procedures, requirements for registration documentation, details of marketing in pharmacies and wholesalers, as well as announcements by the Minister of Health concerning reimbursement rules, availability of medicines and information on drug programmes.
Psychedelics and Cannabidiol (CBD) When Used for Medicinal Purposes
The Act of 29 July 2005 on counteracting drug addiction is the main legal act regulating the status of controlled substances in Poland. The Act classifies these substances as narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances, depending on their properties and addictive potential. The Act introduces a general prohibition on the possession, manufacture, processing, import, export and placing on the market of these substances, providing for criminal sanctions for violations of the prohibition. Exceptions specified in the legislation are only permitted in strictly defined cases, such as approved scientific research, which requires a permit from the Chief Pharmaceutical Inspector.
In Poland, the use of medical cannabis is permitted under Article 33a of the Act on Counteracting Drug Addiction, according to which pharmaceutical raw material derived from non-fibrous hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) may be used for the preparation of prescription medicines, provided that it has been given marketing authorisation. This type of product is dispensed only on the basis of a medical prescription and is subject to control under the rules laid down in the Pharmaceutical Law.
On the other hand, products containing cannabidiol (CBD) come from fibre hemp, varieties of which are permitted for cultivation provided that the THC content in the dry matter does not exceed 0.3%. At this concentration, the product can be marketed without a prescription. The entire process is supervised by the President of the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products, who authorises the raw material for use, and the Chief Pharmaceutical Inspector, who controls wholesale and retail trade.
Telemedicine
Polish law does not contain a single, precise definition of telemedicine. According to legal practice and case law, it is the provision of health services using Information and Communication Technology (ICT) or communication systems. Telemedicine in Poland operates on the basis of a number of regulations which explicitly allow for the provision of remote health services using ICT or communication systems. The legal basis is primarily provided by the Act of 15 April 2011 on medical activity, the Act of 5 December 1996 on the professions of physician and dentist, and the Act of 6 November 2008 on the rights of patients and the Commissioner for Patients’ Rights, which guarantee patients the same rights in telemedicine as in the case of in-person visits, including the right to information, informed consent and personal data protection.
Teleconsultation may include not only diagnosis and recommendations, but also the issuance of e-prescriptions, e-referrals or e-orders for medical devices. The rules for their implementation are laid down in the Act of 28 April 2011 on the health care information system and the implementing provisions of the Minister of Health.
An important element of the telemedicine system in Poland is the Internet Patient Account, which is a central tool for accessing e-health services, enabling, among other things, checking the history of issued and filled e-prescriptions, e-referrals, test results, history of visits financed by the National Health Fund, as well as downloading the EU COVID-19 Certificate. The Internet Patient Account operates within the P1 system, the rules of which are laid down in the Act of 28 April 2011 on the health care information system, the Act of 27 August 2004 on health care services financed from public funds, and the provisions on personal data protection. The Regulation of the Minister of Health of 12 August 2020 specifies the organisational standards for teleconsultations in primary healthcare, including the method of verifying the patient’s identity, documenting the visit and transmitting recommendations.
Medical apps and wearable devices are not subject to separate regulations in Poland. If they meet the definition of a medical device or medical device accessory, they are subject to the regulations referred to in 1.1 Medical Devices.
The problem of borderline products (medicines, medical devices, personal protective equipment, food, cosmetics, biocidal products) is quite common in Polish commercial practice, as in other EU member states. Their classification is based on the interpretation of definitions contained in individual legal acts, Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rulings and recommendations developed by experts, in the case of medical devices by the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG). The application and proper legal classification of borderline products depend primarily on their use, composition and mechanism of action, which is why the product description and intended use declared by the manufacturer are of key importance.
Under Polish law, the Pharmaceutical Law lays down the principle of the primacy of pharmaceutical law in situations where a product meets the criteria for both a medicinal product and another type of product – eg, a supplement, cosmetic or medical device. This means that if a product meets the criteria of different categories regulated by separate provisions and at the same time can be classified as a medicinal product, the provisions of pharmaceutical law apply to it. This provision is crucial for borderline products, as it determines that the status of a “medicinal product” is overriding and determines how it is authorised for marketing. This avoids a situation where products with medicinal properties would be placed on the market under less restrictive legal regimes applicable to other categories.
Pursuant to the Medical Devices Act, the President of the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products issues, at the request of the head of the customs and tax office, an opinion on whether a device, system or procedure pack meets the requirements specified for it. The President of the Office may also issue an opinion on whether a product on the market meets the definition of a device.
However, pursuant to the Act on the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products, the President of the Office is assisted by the Commission for Borderline Products, which deals with products that meet the criteria for both medicinal products and other types of products, and the Commission for Medical Devices, which deals with medical devices. The tasks of the Commission include issuing opinions on the classification of borderline products.
The design and manufacture of medical devices is carried out in accordance with the requirements of Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746, taking into account all applicable implementing provisions and standards, including ISO 13485. In particular, the manufacturing process takes into account the requirements set out in Annexes I to both Regulations relating to the safety and performance of medical devices. In part, the provisions of the national Medical Devices Act also apply here.
Detailed Polish regulations refer in particular to the manufacture of medical devices in health institutions. The Minister responsible for health may restrict the production or use of certain products manufactured in these institutions if this is necessary to protect life, health or the safety of use of the products. Restrictions may include, among other things, conditions of production or use, the technical equipment required for the facilities and the qualifications of the personnel employed.
Under Polish law, the regeneration of single-use devices is permitted, but at the same time, the making available or further use of regenerated single-use devices is prohibited in the territory of the Republic of Poland.
Poland has no additional regulations concerning requirements for manufacturing sites or location requirements, in respect of the entity responsible for compliance requirements overall.
Poland has introduced regulations concerning corporate social responsibility, the environment and sustainable development, which may indirectly apply to the medical devices and health-related consumer products sectors.
With regard to obligations related to ensuring sustainable development throughout the product life cycle, it should be noted that Poland has implemented the provisions of Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2013/34/EU and Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 as regards corporate reporting, including on sustainability. These directives have been implemented into the Polish legal system by amendments to the Accounting Act and the Act on statutory auditors, audit firms and public oversight. In particular, it is worth noting the latest Act of 9 July 2025 amending the Accounting Act, the Act on Statutory Auditors, Audit Firms and Public Supervision and certain other acts concerning the postponement of ESG reporting by two years, which concerns the disclosure by companies of information on, among other things, the impact of their activities on the environment, society and corporate governance.
Another legal act on environmental protection and the protection of human health and life, aimed at preventing waste generation, reducing its volume and minimising the negative impact of its generation and management, is the Act of 14 December 2012 on Waste. These provisions also cover the proper handling of medical waste, which includes, inter alia, used medical products and consumables such as syringes, needles, cannulas, dressings, gauze pads, plasters and medical gloves.
Healthcare service providers are required, inter alia, to register in the national database of products, packaging and waste management (BDO), keep records of medical waste, and segregate and store it in a manner that prevents exposure to potential infectious agents.
Due to the need to protect the environment, Polish law lays down specific rules for the handling of potentially infectious medical waste. These rules are set out in the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 5 October 2017 on the detailed procedure for the handling of medical waste.
The Act of 13 June 2013 on packaging and packaging waste management is also of significant importance in the area of medical device management and their impact on the environment. It sets out the requirements to be met by packaging placed on the market and the rules for handling packaging and packaging waste at all stages of the product life cycle, from manufacture and distribution to waste management.
Advertising in Polish Regulations
In its regulations on medical devices, the Polish legislature did not introduce a legal definition of the term “advertising”, which means that it has not been expressly defined in national legislation relating to medical devices. Consequently, in determining which activities fall within the scope of this term, it is necessary to refer to the literal and linguistic interpretation of the word. It is also necessary to take into account the views expressed in case law and legal doctrine, which provide certain guidelines for distinguishing elements that constitute advertising from those that constitute purely informational communication.
The Supreme Court has indicated that when distinguishing between information and advertising, it must be borne in mind that a statement constitutes advertising when the incentive to purchase the goods prevails over its informative content. This reflects both the intention of the sender and the perception of the average recipient to whom the message is addressed. In addition to the incentive factor, the second key element of advertising is the ability to identify the product. Therefore, a message will constitute advertising only if it is actually possible to identify a specific medical device. Thus, advertising of a medical device may be considered any activity relating to a specific device with the aim of encouraging recipients to purchase or use it.
The Polish Medical Devices Act provides a negative list of activities that do not constitute advertising within the meaning of the provisions. Thus, the following are not considered advertising of a device:
It should be emphasised that the above list is not exhaustive, which means that other activities not explicitly mentioned in the Medical Devices Act may also be classified as information, provided that they do not pursue a promotional purpose.
Advertising Directed to the General Public
Advertising directed to the general public includes messages addressed to the average recipient, in particular the patient. Such advertising includes not only advertising addressed to non-professionals, but also messages which, even contrary to the advertiser’s intentions, actually reach this group of recipients.
The Polish Medical Devices Act introduces a number of restrictions on advertising addressed to the general public. First of all, it requires that such advertising be formulated in a manner understandable to laypersons. It is also prohibited to use the image of persons practising in medical professions or claiming to be such persons, as well as to portray persons presenting the product in a way that may suggest that they are practising a medical profession.
In addition, advertising to the general public may not relate to products intended for use by users other than lay persons. It should be emphasised that, in accordance with the position of the surveillance authority, this prohibition covers products that can only be used by professionals. However, if a product can be used by both lay persons and professionals, its advertising in public communications is permissible.
Furthermore, advertising may not contain direct appeals to children encouraging them to purchase the product or to persuade their parents or other adults to purchase it.
It is also important that all advertising of medical devices intended for the general public must contain certain information required by law, in particular the details of the manufacturer, the authorised representative and the entity responsible for the advertising. In addition, it is necessary to include a warning stating: “This is a medical device. Use it in accordance with the Instruction for use or label”. The form of presentation of the warning depends on the type of advertising message.
Details concerning the publication of advertisements are specified in the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 21 April 2023 on the advertising of medical devices.
Marketing Activities Aimed at Professionals
The Medical Devices Act does not explicitly specify which entities should be considered professionals. Based on the wording of the Medical Devices Act and pharmaceutical law, it can be concluded that advertising directed at professionals may be addressed in particular to persons practising a medical profession and persons trading in medical devices.
Those wishing to advertise exclusively to professionals must take appropriate measures to ensure that their advertising does not reach the general public. This issue is most problematic in the case of advertising via the internet. Therefore, when deciding to advertise to professionals in this form (website, social media), appropriate injunctive relief should be sought.
Other Important Issues in the Field of Medical Device Law
The Polish Medical Devices Act stipulates that advertising of a device may only be conducted by economic operators, including manufacturers, importers and distributors of medical devices. Advertising of a device may also be conducted by other entities, but only after written approval by the economic operator concerned.
However, digital advertising on the internet, including on Google and Meta platforms, and advertising by influencers, which are not explicitly regulated in the medical device law, raise many doubts. In the case of the latter, it is necessary to carry out additional verification of messages under the provisions on combating unfair competition and competition and consumer protection law.
Other Legal Regulations Applicable to the Advertising of Medical Devices
Pursuant to the Pharmaceutical Law Act, it is prohibited to advertise non-pharmacy outlets and their activities relating to medicinal products or medical devices, where non-pharmacy outlets are defined as herbal medicine shops, specialist medical supply shops and shops open to the general public. In practice, this means restrictions on advertising at points of sale, such as general stores, petrol stations and shopping centres, if the advertising includes or refers to medical devices.
According to the Act on Combating Unfair Competition, unfair competition includes, in particular, advertising that is contrary to the law, good morals or human dignity, misleading to the client, appealing to emotions by causing fear, as well as advertising that significantly interferes with privacy – eg, through intrusive solicitation in public places or abuse of technical means of communication. Comparative advertising – ie, advertising that enables direct or indirect recognition of a competitor or their goods or services, is also considered an act of unfair competition if it is contrary to good morals.
Misleading market practices under the Act on Counteracting Unfair Market Practices include, among others:
Special regulations apply to medical devices financed or co-financed from public funds. The Reimbursement Act for medicines, foodstuffs for particular nutritional uses and medical devices provides for sanctions for unlawful activities aimed at increasing the sale of reimbursable products. For example, it is prohibited to offer conditional sales, discounts, rebates, packages and loyalty programmes, donations, prizes, trips, games of chance, mutual betting, various types of vouchers and coupons, as well as to grant other financial or personal benefits to beneficiaries and proprietors.
Under Polish law, trading in medical devices does not require a licence, permit or entry in the register of regulated activities authorising trading in medical devices. Unlike medicinal products, which may only be sold wholesale by pharmaceutical wholesalers, trading in medical devices does not require entities to have the status of a pharmaceutical wholesaler. In the case of reimbursable medical devices, this issue raises doubts and discussions are currently underway regarding changes in the law (more in the Trends & Developments chapter in this guide).
As a rule, products placed on the Polish market must meet the requirements of the regulations on medical devices. One of the key exceptions provided for in Polish law is the possibility of placing on the market or putting into service a product that has not undergone a full conformity assessment procedure. This applies to special situations where public health interests or the need to protect the life and safety of patients so require. In such cases, the President of the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products may authorise the placing on the market or use of the product. An application for such authorisation may be submitted by, among others, entities providing healthcare services, national consultants, the President of the Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System, the President of the National Health Fund or the President of the Government Agency for Strategic Reserves.
In addition, Polish regulations on medical devices provide for a number of prohibitions aimed at protecting public health and ensuring the safety of patients and users. These include:
In the event of a breach of the above prohibitions, the President of the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products may issue an administrative decision to withdraw from the market or use products introduced, distributed, made available or used in violation of the provisions, if required by public health protection or patient safety.
Under Polish law, medical devices may not be sold by means of an agreement concluded outside the business premises within the meaning of the Act of 30 May 2014 on consumer rights. An exception is when the agreement is concluded during a visit to the consumer’s home or place of residence, provided that it was made at the consumer’s express invitation. A distinction should be made between off-premises sales and distance sales, which are not subject to such restrictions.
With regard to medical devices used in the territory of the Republic of Poland, detailed national regulations apply concerning the language in which information must be provided and documents drawn up. These are intended to ensure full transparency of data for patients, users and surveillance authorities, and thus the safe and correct use of devices.
In accordance with the Medical Devices Act, a device intended for lay users must have labels, a user’s guide and a user interface in Polish (possibly using harmonised symbols or recognisable codes) and a declaration of conformity in Polish or translated into Polish. As an exception, the interface may be in English – with the exception of devices for use in life-threatening situations – provided that all commands and terms are explained in the instructions, this does not pose a risk to the user, and this fact is clearly indicated on the packaging.
The situation is different for products intended for professional users. In this case, labels, instructions and declarations of conformity may be in Polish or English, but only information directly addressed to the patient must remain in Polish or be presented using harmonised symbols or codes.
Within the EU single market, the main driver of expansion is the harmonisation of legal regulations resulting from the application of MDR/IVDR and technical requirements resulting from the implementation of harmonised standards by the Polish Committee for Standardisation (PKN). Compliance with these regulations opens up access to the European Economic Community, which by definition reduces barriers to entry between EU member states and facilitates the movement of products between jurisdictions within the EU.
In addition, the President of the Office – on the basis of Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746 and the Act on Medical Devices – issues Free Sale Certificates confirming that a product bearing the CE mark can be legally marketed in the EU and is primarily intended for export. In Poland, the FSC is issued within 15 working days of the submission of the application, for a fee of PLN700 (approximately EUR165). In 2024, the President of the Office received 863 applications and issued 757 certificates, which shows that this instrument is widely used for expansion into non-EU markets.
In the Polish context, the decision to expand abroad is influenced by many factors, including the scale of operations, raw material prices, production and labour costs, the level of taxation and the availability of subsidy programmes. In highly regulated sectors, such as medicinal products and medical devices, entities planning global sales must in any case meet full compliance requirements and be subject to surveillance. However, additional difficulties arise from formal national requirements in target markets and divergent approaches by regulators to the qualification and classification of products and borderline products, which often prolong the market entry process and increase its costs.
Notifications to Regulatory Authorities
The previous registration system, established by the previous Medical Devices Act of 2010, was based on submission made by manufacturers and authorised representatives and on notifications made by importers and distributors. Under transitional provisions, these entities (with the exception of distributors) may still fulfil their registration obligations under the “old” rules, but once they have registered in the Eudemed database, they are exempt from national procedures.
At the same time, the Medical Devices Act of 2022 introduced new, fully electronic registers kept by the President of the Office. These include:
Registration in these systems is free of charge.
Post-Market Surveillance Obligations
The main post-market surveillance obligations arise from the MDR and IVDR, while the Polish Act specifies the national path for reporting medical incidents.
Any person may report a serious incident that has occurred in Poland to the President of the Office. However, the obligation to report immediately a serious incident or, where applicable, to report a suspected serious incident to the manufacturer or its authorised representative lies in particular with entities and persons using the devices professionally, as well as importers, distributors, testing laboratories, institutes, entities servicing and calibrating devices, and entities conducting external quality assessment of diagnostic laboratories. A copy of the report shall be forwarded in parallel to the President of the Office. The notifier shall be obliged to provide the manufacturer, their authorised representative and the President of the Office with the necessary assistance in the investigation, including providing information and making the device and products used in combination with it available for testing.
Safety notes shall be published by the President of the Office, where justified by the need to protect public health, in the Public Information Bulletin on the website of the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products.
The President of the Office has extensive supervisory powers over entities operating on the market, including control of compliance with requirements after the products have been placed on the market. The scope of these powers is described in detail in 3. Regulator Engagement and Enforcement.
The President of the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products is the central government administration body responsible for matters related to:
The State Pharmaceutical Inspection, in order to protect the public interest in the safety of human health and life in the use of medicinal products and medical devices in pharmaceutical wholesalers, pharmacies, hospital pharmacy departments, pharmacy outlets and non-pharmacy outlets, exercises surveillance over, inter alia:
The State Sanitary Inspection is established to perform tasks in the field of public health in order to protect human health against adverse environmental effects and nuisances, prevent the occurrence of diseases, including infectious and occupational diseases, in particular by exercising surveillance over the conditions of:
The tasks of the President of the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products include surveillance of medical devices and their safety. The detailed powers of the President of the Office in relation to medical devices are specified in the Act on the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products and the Act on Medical Devices. According to these acts, the President of the Office plays a key role in the medical device surveillance system. They have key competences, which include issuing administrative decisions on prohibiting or restricting the availability of a device, its withdrawal from the market or from use. In the event of a breach of the provisions on the advertising of medical devices, they order the removal of the identified infringements, the cessation of the publication, display or advertising of the advertisement in question, or the publication of the decision in places or media of mass communication.
Persons authorised by the President of the Office to carry out inspections have a wide range of powers to effectively detect non-compliance and gather evidence. They may visit any premises, sites and means of transport used by the inspected entity, as well as its suppliers and subcontractors. These powers also include the right to request oral or written explanations, to inspect documents and other information carriers, and to access data relevant to the subject of the inspection. Inspectors have the right to examine documents, products and equipment, take samples of products for testing and verify the implementation of post-inspection recommendations.
The tasks of pharmaceutical inspection in the area of medical devices include, in particular, control of the conditions of transport, handling and storage of products, surveillance of pharmacies and other entities engaged in the wholesale and retail trade in medicinal products and medical devices, as well as control of the correct labelling and advertising of medicinal products and the labelling of medical devices.
The consequences of violating safety rules in the trade of medical devices are reflected in administrative penalties. Such violations include, for example, failure by entities in the supply chain to comply with the requirements laid down in Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746, failure by the manufacturer to establish a risk management system, and failure to comply with information obligations towards surveillance authorities. An important measure for enforcing the regulations is the establishment of a system of administrative fines. These fines can be as high as PLN5 million (approximately EUR1,178,000). The amount of the penalties is a preventive measure and serves as a disciplinary measure for entities involved in the medical device supply chain.
The Polish legislature has also provided for administrative penalties for violations of the rules on advertising medical devices. The ratio legis of this solution is primarily to ensure the safety of users, as incorrect information provided in advertising may lead to the misuse of a device and, consequently, pose a threat to life or health. For this reason, advertising that misleads as to the device’s intended purpose, safety or performance of a product is subject to a penalty of up to PLN5 million (approximately EUR1,178,000), while other violations of advertising rules may be punished with fines of up to PLN2 million (approximately EUR,471,000).
Pharmaceutical law provides for sanctions not only in the form of administrative fines of up to PLN5 million (approximately EUR1,178,000) or in the form of immobilisation of the place of manufacturing or import, pharmaceutical warehouse, pharmacy, pharmacy outlet or other facility, or withdrawal of a medicinal product or medical device from the market, but also criminal sanctions in the form of fines, restriction of liberty or imprisonment for up to five years.
Although the MDR and IVDR regulations have been in force for some time, in practice the process of adapting to their detailed requirements is still ongoing. This is due both to the large number and complexity of the regulations and to the need to change the existing practices of market operators. At this stage, however, most administrative proceedings do not concern direct breaches of safety rules by the devices themselves but focus on formal issues such as the incorrect choice of clinical trial procedure, irregularities in documentation, misleading or unlawful advertising practices.
Experience to date shows that when imposing administrative penalties, the President of the Office often mitigates them, making the amount of the penalty dependent on several factors, in particular the number and nature of the infringements, their seriousness, and the scale and importance of the economic operator’s business. The aim is to ensure that the penalty remains proportionate to the degree of the infringement and the real economic capacity of the entrepreneur.
Under the rules laid down in the Medical Devices Act, the President of the Office may also waive the imposition of a penalty. This applies to situations where the event was incidental, did not pose a risk, and the entity remedied the infringement within the time limit set by the President and informed the authority thereof. In practice, however, waivers of penalties are rare.
With regard to claims for damages, the provisions of the Civil Code governing liability for damage caused by a defective product, adopted as part of the implementation of Council Directive 85/374/EEC, are of key importance. The liability regulated by these provisions is based on the principle of risk – ie, it is independent of any fault on the part of the liable party. In a dispute with the liable party, the injured party must therefore prove the occurrence of damage, the defective nature of the product and the causal link between the defective product and the damage.
Medical devices may be classified as defective if they do not provide the expected safety when used normally. Importantly, such “defectiveness” of a product may result not only from its composition or design, but also from its presentation on the market and the information provided to consumers, such as instructions for use or a leaflet. It cannot be ruled out that damage may occur as a result of an error on the part of the injured party, which of course excludes the attribution of liability to other entities.
The manufacturer (including the manufacturer of the material or parts of the product) is primarily liable for damage caused by a defective product. Entities claiming to be the manufacturer (eg, distributors) and importers are also liable in the same way as the manufacturer. Under medical device law, entities that make available a device under its name or registered trade mark, change the intended purpose of a device or modify a device already placed on the market, may be liable. Any other persons who, through their actions or omissions in connection with the product, have caused damage (eg, medical personnel or pharmacies) may also be held liable.
It is worth noting that the provisions of the MDR and IVDR impose an obligation on medical device manufacturers to take out insurance against potential liability under EU regulations on liability for defective products.
The provisions on liability for damage caused by a defective product do not exclude liability under other titles, so the injured party may consider seeking compensation on general grounds (ex contractu and ex delicto). Product defects may also give rise to claims under, among other things, the manufacturer’s warranty for defects or guarantee.
The EU legislature’s response to technological progress and the resulting need to adapt the nearly 40-year-old rules on liability for defective products is the adoption of Directive 2024/2853 of the European Parliament and of the Council. With regard to technological developments, the new directive provides, among other things, for the inclusion of digital manufacturing files and software in the definition of “product” and the obligation to take cybersecurity requirements into account when assessing product defects. The new provisions must be implemented into national law by 9 December 2026, so legislative work on amending the relevant provisions of the Civil Code can be expected in the near future.
Pursuing claims in court requires the injured party to file a lawsuit. The lawsuit must meet the formal requirements specified in procedural regulations, including, among other things, indicating the date on which the claim became due and the facts on which the claimant bases their claim.
Compensation cases (as property rights cases) are heard in the first instance by regional or district courts (if the value of the dispute exceeds PLN100,000 – approximately EUR20,000). An appeal against a first instance court judgment may be lodged with the district court or the court of appeal, as appropriate. A final judgment of the court of second instance may be appealed to the Supreme Court. However, a cassation appeal is not admissible if the value of the subject matter of the appeal is less than PLN50,000 (approximately EUR12,500) and is not based on allegations concerning the determination of facts or the assessment of evidence.
When initiating a civil trial, the claimant should, as a rule, pay a court fee. In the case of monetary claims, the amount of the fee depends on the amount claimed. However, it is possible to exempt a person in a difficult financial situation from court costs.
As a rule, the winning party is entitled to a refund of the costs of the trial. In exceptional circumstances, however, the court may order the losing party to pay only part of the costs or not to pay any costs at all. A partial success in a civil case leads to the mutual waiver or proportional allocation of costs. In the event of a court settlement or a court-approved settlement reached before a mediator, the parties bear the costs of the proceedings in equal parts (unless otherwise agreed in the settlement), and the claimant is entitled to a refund of half of the court fees paid.
In the case of a party represented by a professional representative, the costs of the proceedings consist of the costs of legal representation, court costs and the costs of compulsory appearance in court. The costs of legal representation are determined on the basis of minimum rates specified in a separate legal act, which depend on the value of the subject matter of the case or are assigned to a specific type of case. If a civil case requires a hearing, the civil court, taking into account the amount of work performed by the representative and the nature of the case, may set the costs of legal representation at up to six times the minimum rate.
In the event of an unfavourable decision by the national regulatory authority – the President of the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products (eg, prohibition of marketing or withdrawal from the market), the party may file an appeal in the form of a request for reconsideration of the case. The deadline for submitting such a request is 14 days from the date of delivery of the decision to the party in the first instance. The effective submission of a request for reconsideration suspends the execution of the contested decision, unless it is subject to immediate enforcement by law or on the basis of the order imposed by the first instance authority.
The model of judicial review of public administration in Poland gives the party the possibility to file a complaint against administrative decisions to an administrative court, which examines only the legality of the contested decision. The deadline for filing a complaint is 30 days from the date of delivery of the decision to the party. Unlike a request for reconsideration of a case, the suspension of the execution of a decision does not take effect upon the filing of a complaint with the administrative court. However, if the party is at risk of significant damage or irreversible consequences as a result of the enforcement of the decision, it should request that the enforcement of the decision be suspended. The party may appeal against the judgment of the administrative court to the Supreme Administrative Court.
The actions of entities operating on the medical device market, such as breaching the obligation to provide accurate information or acts of unfair competition, may also be classified as practices infringing the collective interests of consumers. In such a case, the national competition authority may issue a decision ordering the cessation of a specific practice. In this case, we also use the administrative appeal procedure.
In cases concerning liability for damage caused by a defective product, it is possible to bring a class action based on the Act on the Pursuit of Claims in Group Proceedings. The provisions on group proceedings apply when at least ten persons pursue claims of the same type based on the same factual basis or claims with common relevant factual circumstances. If monetary claims are being pursued, the amount of the claims of individual members of the group or of a subgroup (consisting of at least two persons) should be standardised. For a case to be heard in group proceedings, an appropriate request must be made in the lawsuit.
In order to be a member of a group acting as a claimant in group proceedings, the injured parties must submit a statement of accession to the group and agree on a representative of the group. However, the injured parties are not obliged to join the group and may pursue their claims individually.
Class action proceedings differ from ordinary civil proceedings in several important ways, including the jurisdiction of the court (cases in the first instance are heard by the district court regardless of the value of the claim) and the requirement for representation by a professional attorney.
In addition to class actions, there are also other mechanisms enabling the joint examination of several cases related to liability for a defective product, such as the combination of related cases for joint examination or formal participation on the part of the injured parties.
With regard to medical devices, class actions have not yet been used in practice by Polish courts.
Recognising the benefits for the justice system of out-of-court settlement of civil disputes, the legislature has provided for a number of legal mechanisms to encourage parties to ADR.
Before filing a lawsuit, the claimant should attempt to settle the dispute amicably. If no such attempt has been made, the claimant must explain the reasons for this in the lawsuit. In the course of the proceedings, the court should seek to settle the case amicably, which may take the form of a settlement reached before the court, a settlement reached before a mediator, or an out-of-court settlement.
In contractual relations, the parties may also include additional clauses related to ADR, such as a clause referring the dispute to arbitration (arbitration court) or a clause on out-of-court settlement of disputes arising from the contract.
Criminal, civil and administrative liability mechanisms are independent of each other in the sense that the absence of liability of one type does not automatically imply liability of another type. In particular, obtaining compensation or damages in criminal proceedings does not preclude the pursuit of the remaining part in civil proceedings. However, decisions made under individual mechanisms may influence the attribution of another type of liability. For example, a civil court is, as a rule, bound by the findings of a final criminal ruling regarding the commission of a crime.
The field of life sciences is increasingly becoming a topic of discussion in Polish politics. More legislative measures, development strategies, projects and discussions concern scientific research related to innovations in medicine, including their safety and impact on the environment. Polish authorities and state agencies are actively shaping policy in relation to the functioning of the medical devices sector.
In February 2025, the Council of Ministers adopted a regulation establishing the IDEAS Research Institute. The Institute’s activities include conducting scientific research and development work in the field of exact sciences.
At the same time, the following entities are actively involved.
In addition, initiatives such as the Green Coalition for Health are emerging in the country, providing a platform for co-operation for the sustainable development of the healthcare sector in Poland. The task of the Green Coalition for Health is to disseminate and promote sustainable development models, work to minimise negative environmental impacts, prevent the health effects of environmental hazards and improve the quality of sustainable management in the healthcare sector. In April 2025, the Coalition published a comprehensive report entitled “Medical devices from an economic and ecological perspective”.
Legislative work is currently underway to amend the Act on Reimbursement of medicines, foodstuffs for particular nutritional uses and medical devices, known as the Broad Amendment to the Reimbursement Act (Szeroka Nowelizacja Ustawy Refundacyjnej – SZNUR). This will be the second amendment to the Reimbursement Act in recent years, which aims, among other things, to facilitate access to medicines and medical devices, simplify procedures and correct errors in the previous amendment.
SZNUR provides for a number of legislative changes relating to the reimbursement of medical devices available in pharmacies on prescription (eg, certain dressings, glucose meter strips). The changes in this area are common to medical devices, medicinal products and foodstuffs for special nutritional purposes and concern, among other things, the waiver of the requirement to demonstrate the availability of a medical device on the date of submission of the reimbursement application, the possibility of changing the addressee of the reimbursement decision, and obligations regarding the volume and continuity of supplies.
With regard to medical devices issued to patients on the basis of a separate order (eg, orthoses, prostheses, hearing aids, wheelchairs), SZNUR provides for the introduction of an obligation to review medical devices reimbursed under this procedure at least once every two years, in order to enable comprehensive adaptation of the catalogue of reimbursed devices to the needs of patients and market realities, taking into account the growing social demand for these products and the development of medical technologies.
The key legal act regulating artificial intelligence is the AI Act – ie, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828. The Regulation entered into force on 1 August 2024 and will be fully applicable from 2 August 2026.
Regulations on artificial intelligence, in particular the AI Act, have a significant impact on the functioning of the medical device market. The AI Act indicates that more than one piece of Union harmonisation legislation may apply to a single product, such as Regulation (EU) 2017/745 or Regulation (EU) 2017/746, since making a product available or putting it into service may only take place if the product complies with all applicable EU harmonisation legislation. However, it should be noted that the AI Act and the MDR/IVDR have separate risk criteria and conformity assessment procedures. The risk classification under the AI Act applies to the AI system as such, and not necessarily to the entire product in which the system is used.
At the national level, work is underway on the Artificial Intelligence Systems Act. The Act is intended to be of an executive and implementing nature, with its main objective being to establish an organisational framework for the enforcement of the AI Act. The draft of this Act was updated in 2025, introducing, among other things, changes to the supervision of the AI market as well as to support for innovation and testing of new technologies. The draft provides for the establishment of the Artificial Intelligence Development and Security Commission, which would act as the market surveillance authority for artificial intelligence systems. It will operate a national contact point through which citizens and entities will be able to report infringements of the AI Act. The Commission would co-operate, among others, with the President of the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products in matters relating to the use of artificial intelligence systems in medical devices, medical diagnostics, disease treatment, and in connection with the manufacture, testing or use of medicines. The draft provides that the Commission will include, among others, a representative of the President of the Office.
Wilhelma Feldmana 4/12
31-130 Kraków
Poland
+48 124 100 525
kancelaria@kancelariadbs.pl www.kancelariadbs.plIntroduction
In recent years, the medical device sector in the European Union has undergone significant regulatory changes which, although demanding, open up new prospects for development. The new regulations are intended not only to strengthen the safety and quality of devices, but also to adapt the entire regulatory system to the pace of technological and scientific progress and to the growing expectations of patients.
In this context, implementing regulations, case law and social initiatives in both Europe and Poland are focused on finding solutions that will enable the potential of the new regulations to be exploited while mitigating their most demanding aspects.
Recently, the medical device market in Poland has been undergoing dynamic changes, driven both by regulatory changes (European and national) and growing demand for innovative technologies in healthcare.
Below, we discuss the key developments and trends in the medical device market in Poland that we believe have the potential to have a real impact on the further development of the industry.
New Legislation
The draft amendment to the Act on the reimbursement of medicines, foodstuffs intended for particular nutritional uses and medical devices, published on 22 May 2025, constitutes one of the most far-reaching reforms of the reimbursement system in recent years. The proposed provisions include, among other things, increasing the involvement of patient organisations in the reimbursement procedure, regular review of the list of medical devices reimbursed on the basis of a separate order, as well as procedures to streamline the decision-making process and increase the predictability of the system. These changes send a clear signal to the entire market that it is necessary to re-examine existing reimbursement models and efficiently prepare organisational and decision-making processes to function in the new legal environment.
The draft amendment is currently being analysed by the Ministry of Health in the light of comments submitted by state authorities and industry organisations. Given the planned date of entry into force of the amendment (1 January 2026), intensive legislative work and the publication of further versions of the draft are to be expected in the coming months.
Trends in Case Law – Tax and Regulatory Matters
Over the past year, certain trends have emerged in Polish case law concerning medical devices that are of significant importance to businesses operating in this sector. An analysis of the rulings shows that courts are increasingly combining the interpretation of medical device regulations with other areas of law, in particular tax regulations and local administrative requirements. A significant number of cases concern preferential rates of value added tax, the application of which depends directly on the correct classification of the product in the Combined Nomenclature or according to statutory definitions. Some of the proceedings are based on a divergence of views between businesses and the supervisory authority regarding the rules for determining the regulatory status of medical clothing. The resolution of this issue has a direct impact on tax consequences, and the interrelationship between regulatory and fiscal rules is becoming an important point of reference for courts when assessing such cases. It is also worth noting a new trend in intellectual property court rulings.
The judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of March 2025 is part of a growing trend in case law, in which the correct classification of medical devices is of key importance for preferential rates of goods and services tax. The dispute concerned hygienic underpads, registered as a Class I medical device, CE marked and authorised for sale in Poland. The manufacturer sought classification under Combined Nomenclature code 9619 (“other sanitary articles for persons unable to control their bladder or bowels”), which would allow taxation at a rate of 5% VAT. However, the tax authorities decided that the product falls under CN code 4818 (“articles of paper pulp, paper, cellulose wadding...”) and is subject to 8% VAT. The Supreme Administrative Court, in its judgment of March 2025, emphasised that the rate of VAT on a medical device is determined not only by its status resulting from its registration as a medical device or CE marking, but above all by its correct classification in the Combined Nomenclature, carried out in accordance with the General Rules for the Interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature (ORINS). The court pointed out that CN heading 9619 covers only articles which, by their nature, are in direct contact with the human skin and fit to the body, such as sanitary pads, nappies or liners, whereas the hygienic underpads at issue serve to protect bedding, beds or wheelchairs and not to protect the skin directly, and are not designed to fit the user’s body. An analysis of the structural characteristics showed that their essential character is determined by cellulose pulp, which acts as an absorbent layer and constitutes the dominant element of the product, which determines their classification under heading 4818 of CN Chapter 48, covering articles of paper pulp, paper or cellulose fibres for household, sanitary or hospital use. Thus, the Supreme Administrative Court ruled that the 8% VAT rate is appropriate and that the allegations in the appeal concerning incorrect classification and procedural violations are unfounded.
In subsequent cases, the entity submitted a request to the Director of the National Tax Information Office for the classification of goods “apron with foil laminate”, “medical protective apron”, “medical procedure shirt” and “gynaecological skirt” for the purposes of determining the rate of tax on goods and services. In its judgments of October 2024, the Supreme Administrative Court overturned the decisions of the Director of the National Tax Information Office, emphasising that the nature of the infringement of the law requires the case to be re-examined. The court pointed out that although the tax authority correctly concluded that the goods in question did not fall within the definition of a medical device as specified in Article 2(1)(38) of the Medical Devices Act of 2010, the key issue in the case was the interpretation of Article 132 of the Medical Devices Act, which contains a broader definition of the term, including, inter alia, accessory for a medical device and systems and procedure pack. The Supreme Administrative Court did not rule on whether the goods met the conditions contained in the broader definition and did not make any recommendations as to the direction of the tax authority’s re-assessment of the case. However, it emphasised that the tax authority and the court of first instance had erred in limiting their assessment to a single, narrower definition of a medical device. This case illustrates an important trend in the application of the law – a move away from a narrow definition of a medical device towards a broader definition. The Supreme Administrative Court emphasised that since the Goods and Services Tax Act refers to “medical devices within the meaning of the Medical Devices Act”, all meanings of this term provided for in the Act must be taken into account, including those covering accessory for a medical device and system and procedure pack. Limiting the scope to the definition of a medical device would lead to a violation of the principles of legislative technique and systemic interpretation and could ultimately be detrimental to taxpayers.
The most recent case dealt with the request for interpretation of legal provisions in connection with the planned distribution of reimbursable medical devices from a warehouse that was not a pharmaceutical wholesaler. The company claimed that in such a case, a licence to operate a wholesaler was not required because it did not intend to trade in medicinal products. The Chief Pharmaceutical Inspector considered this position to be incorrect, arguing that hospital pharmacies and hospital pharmacy departments should purchase reimbursed medical devices exclusively from pharmaceutical wholesalers, which ensures compliance with Good Distribution Practice standards. At the same time, he stated that the interpretation of the provisions of the Reimbursement Act falls outside the competence of the State Pharmaceutical Inspection. The court disagreed with the latter position. The judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of December 2024 shows the growing importance of systemic interpretation in the assessment of provisions concerning the distribution of medical devices. Increasingly, authorities and courts are analysing the activities of businesses in the industry in the context of the entire legal system, rather than individual regulations. The court confirmed that administrative authorities, when considering a request for an individual interpretation, should take into account all provisions relevant to the case. This means that, in practice, distributors of medical devices can expect the authorities to fully assess their business model, taking into account, for example, the Reimbursement Act, pharmaceutical law and regulations on medical devices.
Trends in Case Law – IP Matters
It is also worth noting a new trend in the case law of intellectual property courts (“IP Courts”), resulting from a revolutionary change in the provisions of Polish civil procedure law relating to preliminary injunction proceedings. When examining applications by patent holders for a preliminary injunction, the IP Courts rejected a number of such motions due to the relatively high likelihood that the patent would be invalidated in ongoing proceedings before the Patent Office. These rulings demonstrate the practical significance of the provision of the Civil Procedure Code, effective as of 1 July 2023, which states that the IP Court must consider the likelihood of a patent being invalidated in other pending proceedings when determining the grounds for granting a preliminary injunction. Under the previous legal regime, the IP Court would not have taken into account the likelihood of a patent being invalidated in other proceedings when deciding whether to grant a preliminary injunction. This is because, in Poland, infringement proceedings are handled by the court, while invalidity proceedings fall under the jurisdiction of the Patent Office, with each process conducted independently by separate authorities. In patent disputes initiated by patent holders and involving competitors where parallel patent invalidity proceedings are pending, we have observed that IP Courts no longer grant preliminary injunctions as frequently as they did in the past. Furthermore, according to the amended provisions on preliminary injunction proceedings, the entity against which the application for a preliminary injunction has been filed now has, as a rule, the opportunity to participate in the proceedings, whereas under the previous legal regime, such proceedings were conducted ex parte. This has significantly altered the position of medical device manufacturers and distributors whose activities could be perceived by patent holders as falling within the scope of patent protection. In practice, this means that launching a medical device while a patent on a competing product is in force is no longer as risky. The court will not issue a temporary injunction without considering the other party’s position, or whether the patent meets the conditions for invalidation. This suggests that more new products, including medical devices, will be introduced to the Polish market.
Measures Taken by the President of the Office for Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products
Recently, there has been a growing trend towards the digitisation of supervisory processes and the simplification of selected administrative procedures, which is intended to make it easier for businesses to operate efficiently in a changing regulatory environment. The abolition of the obligation to submit notifications and submissions to the President of the Office for Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products (the “President of the Office”), which have been replaced by electronic systems, has resulted in shorter case processing times and allowed entrepreneurs to bring products to market more quickly.
Last year saw a high level of activity in the area of clinical trials of medical devices. The President of the Office issued 69 authorisations to commence clinical trials and 82 decisions authorising changes to such trials, which indicates the significant scope of research work in this field. The most common trials involved products in the fields of cardiology and orthopaedics. Most of these were products already on the market, but in new innovative applications.
We have noticed a clear increase in the activity of authorities in the area of product safety control and medical incidents. A threefold increase in the number of such inspections compared to the previous year demonstrates the priority that the President of the Office attaches to patient safety. Co-operation with notified bodies and customs authorities has also been strengthened in order to reduce the inflow of products that do not comply with the Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) on medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) on in vitro diagnostic medical devices.
An important area of the President’s activities is administrative decisions related to compliance with regulations on the advertising of medical devices. In 2024, the first year after the introduction of new regulations on the advertising of medical devices, to which the market is still adapting, the President of the Office issued eight administrative decisions on penalties, including cases of violations of the rules for conducting promotional activities and non-compliance with the requirements for the content and form of communication. These decisions reflect the growing importance of supervising the marketing communication of medical devices, as well as the Office’s consistent enforcement of its obligations under the new Medical Devices Act.
We also note a trend towards intensifying work on the harmonisation of standards and the implementation of EU and international guidelines. In 2024, over a hundred opinions were issued on national, European and international standards, indicating a growing need to adapt the Polish market to a uniform, high level of product quality and safety. This harmonisation process supports the development of exports and makes it easier for Polish manufacturers to compete on foreign markets.
Implementation of the Regulation (EU) 2017/745 and Regulation (EU) 2017/746
The introduction of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) on medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) on in vitro diagnostic medical devices has been one of the key elements of the modernisation of the regulatory system in the medical device sector. The new regulations have not only raised patient safety and product quality standards, but also introduced a consistent, uniform legal framework for the entire European Union. More detailed requirements for the design, certification and marketing of products have prompted investment in specialised staff, compliance procedures, testing and modern surveillance tools.
From the observed trends, two main themes emerge: the continued emphasis on ensuring patient safety and the equally important need for clinical effectiveness. At the same time, innovation and competitiveness play a key role, particularly in improving access to highly specialised devices used in rare diseases or niche clinical applications. Strengthening these elements will support not only therapeutic outcomes but also the strategic position of the medical device sector.
The Polish market, like others in the EU, is undergoing a process of adaptation to the new realities, treating them as an element of the industry’s development and professionalisation. In this situation, clarity of regulations, transparency of processes – especially certification processes – and the possibility of shortening the time to market while reducing the costs of these procedures are of particular importance.
Currently, there are few notified bodies authorised to certify medical devices in Poland, which naturally lengthens the waiting time for obtaining a certificate of conformity. Despite these challenges, domestic manufacturers and importers are actively seeking ways to speed up processes, increase efficiency and maintain competitiveness. In this context, dialogue between the industry and European institutions and initiatives aimed at adapting regulations to market realities are becoming increasingly important.
Therefore, the European Commission’s December 2024 initiative on the possible deregulation of selected MDR and IVDR provisions was welcomed with high expectations. It opened the door to broad consultations involving individual entrepreneurs, industry associations and law firms specialising in the medical device sector, including lawyers from the DBS team.
The proposed modifications – including simplification and standardisation of procedures, from conformity assessment to documentation handling, as well as modernisation of processes through digitisation – have the potential to significantly accelerate the development of the sector. Their implementation could shorten the time it takes to bring innovative solutions to market, increase the predictability of administrative processes and strengthen the position of Polish companies in the European medical device ecosystem. Ultimately, this also means faster and easier access to modern, safe technologies for patients. A similar drive to simplify procedures and increase efficiency can also be seen in initiatives taken at a national level to respond to the specific needs of the Polish market.
Recommendations for Changes to Polish Regulations
In response to the need for greater transparency and real citizen participation in the law-making process, a Polish platform has been created in the form of a tool that enables the monitoring, analysis and promotion of legislative proposals. The platform is open and public, and its mission is to bridge the gap between citizens and the state.
Users – from doctors and entrepreneurs to patients – can submit their own ideas, evaluate existing initiatives and participate in substantive discussions.
The potential of the platform is particularly evident in the medical device sector, an area of fundamental importance for modern medicine. It features many proposals for changes that will directly or indirectly improve the functioning of this industry. Three of these initiatives deserve special attention and are discussed below. It is worth noting that these ideas are developed in the form of complete legislative proposals and then forwarded to policymakers in this form.
The first of the proposed initiatives concerns the abolition of national registers recording the placing of medical devices on the market in Poland. An electronic register of medical devices, introduced by the Act of 2022 (the so-called Distributors’ Register), has been in operation for over a year. At the same time, entities and individuals engaged in medical activities and other entities that use devices for business or professional purposes, including hospitals, are required to register all devices brought into Poland in a separate database. Some of the data in these systems is automatically retrieved from the European Eudamed database, which contains information on all medical devices placed on the European market by manufacturers and importers. In this context, maintaining additional national registers appears unjustified and, at the same time, constitutes an additional administrative burden for businesses and healthcare entities. The proposed amendment provides for the elimination of the redundant register and the reallocation of the resources of the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products to areas requiring greater support.
The second proposal aims to facilitate hospitals’ access to medical devices for which reimbursement decisions have been issued by clarifying the regulations on purchases. The current provisions of the Pharmaceutical Law regulating the trade in medical devices are interpreted by the Pharmaceutical Inspection Authority in a way that limits the list of entities from which medical institutions may purchase medical devices to pharmaceutical wholesalers only. In practice, this eliminates the possibility of using suppliers who often offer better financial and logistical conditions. The proposed amendment clearly states that hospitals may purchase medical devices from any entity that meets the quality and regulatory requirements, including directly from manufacturers. This solution would increase competition and could significantly reduce the costs incurred by healthcare facilities. This issue was also addressed in one of the rulings described above.
The third proposal concerns the abolition of the obligation to monitor and control temperature and humidity during the transport of all medical devices. Currently, these parameters must be documented even if the manufacturer has not indicated that this is necessary. This generates additional costs without bringing any real benefits. The proposed solution involves adapting the obligations to the actual properties and requirements of individual products.
Observing these initiatives, one can see the direction in which Polish regulations on medical devices should be heading. Representatives of the sector are increasingly calling for the simplification of procedures, the elimination of unnecessary formalities and the adaptation of regulations to market realities. This trend – the pursuit of efficiency and rationalisation of the law – is reflected in the proposals presented on the platform.
In the context of medical devices in Poland, the Budzimy Innowacje (We Wake Up Innovation) initiative is also particularly interesting, as it is part of a broader trend of searching for systemic solutions conducive to the development of modern technologies, including in the medtech sector. Its creators – Polish scientists, entrepreneurs and economists – emphasise that the removal of barriers is a prerequisite for the global success of domestic innovations. They point out that the government’s strategy “Poland. A Year of Breakthrough”, announced in February 2025, clearly emphasises investment in science, the development of new technologies and the creation of a dynamic capital market as the pillars of economic transformation. In practice, this means that the medical device sector, which is based on intensive research and a high level of technological advancement, could become one of the main beneficiaries of the planned reforms, provided that the new regulatory and financial framework genuinely supports a rapid transition from the research and development phase to global commercialisation. This approach could significantly strengthen the competitiveness of domestic medtech manufacturers on international markets.
Wilhelma Feldmana 4/12
31-130 Kraków
Poland
+48 12 410 05 25
kancelaria@kancelariadbs.pl www.kancelariadbs.pl