The Singapore Legal System
Singapore adopts a common law system, and its sources of law are derived from the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, legislation, subsidiary legislation and case law. Judicial power in Singapore is vested in the Supreme Court of Singapore and in such subordinate courts as may be provided by any written law currently in force.
Overview of the Laws and Regulations Applicable to a Business Operating in Singapore
The laws and regulations applicable to a business operating in Singapore depend on factors such as the legal form of the business, its industry sector and its business activities.
An incorporated company is the most common legal form by which businesses operate in Singapore. The main statute applicable to a company incorporated in Singapore is the Companies Act 1967 of Singapore (the “Companies Act”). The Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority of Singapore (ACRA) is responsible for the administration of the Companies Act, and is the regulator of, amongst others, business registration in Singapore. Depending on the proposed business name and business activity, specific approval may be required from industry-specific regulatory authorities in Singapore. Once a company is incorporated in Singapore, it will be a separate legal entity capable of entering into contracts, of suing and being sued, and having perpetual succession with power to hold land.
Some key legal and regulatory regimes applicable to a company incorporated in Singapore include:
Singapore generally has an open investment regime, in line with its broader economic development strategy designed to attract inbound foreign direct investment (FDI), and offers a variety of grants and incentives to eligible foreign investors.
Historically, there has been no specific legislation that governs inbound FDI, and there is generally no requirement for an investment to be reviewed or approved by any Singapore regulatory authority for the sole reason that such investment is from a foreign source.
However, laws and regulations applicable to certain regulated sectors may restrict foreign investments, such as investments in the domestic news media and broadcasting sectors. Please refer to 8.1 Other Regimes for more information.
In addition, under the new Significant Investments Review Act 2024 (SIRA), which came into force on 28 March 2024, the regulation of significant investments by both local and foreign investors into entities critical to Singapore’s national security interests that are designated under SIRA (the “Designated Entities”) has increased. For entities designated under SIRA, notification or approval obligations for specified changes in ownership or control of the entities will be imposed. For example, financial sponsors who are buying into Designated Entities will be required to notify the Minister for Trade and Industry (the “Minister”) after becoming a 5% controller and will have to seek the Minister’s approval before becoming a 12%, 25% or 50% controller. Financial sponsors will also have to seek the Minister’s approval before becoming an indirect controller or acquiring as a going concern the business or undertaking, or parts of it.
In recent years, Singapore has witnessed a transformative shift in its regulatory landscape, marked by a concerted effort to enhance sustainability practices and embrace digital innovation.
The co-ordinated initiative to improve sustainability practices reflects a growing recognition of the importance of ESG factors in corporate performance and risk management. As more businesses are compelled to provide transparent and comparable sustainability data, such businesses are not only held accountable to regulators and investors but are also encouraged to adopt more responsible practices that align with global sustainability goals.
The move to go digital through the introduction of the digitalisation of document verification also represents a marked improvement in terms of operational efficiency and security in business transactions. This initiative will streamline the authentication process for essential documents, allowing companies to engage in faster and more reliable cross-border transactions.
On the regulatory front, concerns arising out of the “Income-Allianz” deal, including those regarding Income Insurance’s ability to fulfil its social mission if the deal went through, contributed to the Singapore Parliament passing the Insurance (Amendment) Bill on 16 October 2024. While there may be concerns that this may negatively impact Singapore’s reputation as an open, rules-based and pro-enterprise business hub, the Second Minister of Finance, Chee Hong Tat, stressed that Singapore remains committed to maintaining this reputation. In this connection, the Insurance (Amendment) Bill was specifically devised to target an insurer that is either a co-operative or linked to a co-operative, which helps to limit the impact on the larger insurance market.
Together, these initiatives reflect an approach to governance that prioritises sustainability, accountability and innovation — key pillars for navigating the complexities of modern business in an increasingly interconnected world. As these changes take effect, businesses will need to adapt to new compliance requirements, ultimately contributing to a more resilient and responsible economic landscape.
Some of the trends and developments that have emerged in Singapore are set out in the Singapore Trends and Developments chapter in this guide.
Overview
Transaction structures used in Singapore depend on factors such as the existing shareholding structure of the target company, the assets involved, the commercial objectives of the parties, the industry, and regulatory considerations.
Common Structures Used for Acquisitions in Singapore
The acquisition of a Singapore private company or a business is commonly structured as:
The acquisition of a Singapore public company listed on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (SGX) is commonly structured as:
Common Structures for a Minority Investment in a Private Company Incorporated in Singapore
A minority investment in a private company incorporated in Singapore can take the form of a subscription of shares or convertible instruments issued by the private company or the acquisition of shares from the existing shareholders of the private company via a secondary sale.
Overview
Singapore mergers and acquisitions (M&A) transactions can generally be categorised as:
Private M&A Transactions Involving Private Companies
The acquisition of shares or the business and assets of a Singapore private company is generally not regulated in Singapore. However, certain M&A transactions may require regulatory review and approval, such as:
Private M&A Transactions Involving Unlisted Public Companies
In addition to the considerations set out above, an M&A transaction involving the acquisition of an unlisted Singapore public company with (i) more than 50 shareholders and (ii) net tangible assets of SGD5 million or more has to comply with the letter and spirit of the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers (the “Takeover Code”). Approvals by, waivers from, and/or notifications to the Securities Industry Council of Singapore (SIC) may be required depending on the terms of the private M&A transaction.
Public M&A Transactions
In addition to the considerations set out above, an M&A transaction involving the acquisition of a public company with a primary listing on the SGX has to comply with the Companies Act (if the target is a Singapore-incorporated company), the Securities and Futures Act 2001 of Singapore (SFA), the Takeover Code and the Listing Manual of the SGX (the “Listing Manual”). Approvals by, waivers from, and/or notifications to the SIC and the SGX may be required, depending on the terms of the public M&A transaction.
A private limited company is the most common legal form by which businesses operate in Singapore, representing approximately 72.6% of all live entities on ACRA’s register. The key corporate governance rules and requirements applicable to a company can be found in the Companies Act, the constitution of the company, and, if applicable, the shareholders’ agreement.
In addition, a company in Singapore listed on the SGX also has to comply with the Listing Manual as well as the Code of Corporate Governance.
Depending on the company’s industry sector and its business activities, additional corporate governance rules, requirements and norms may also apply. For example, financial institutions incorporated in Singapore are required to comply with the Guidelines on Corporate Governance issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).
In the case of a private company, it is common for the shareholders of the company to enter into a separate shareholders’ agreement setting out the terms governing their relationship, including the rights available to the minority shareholders, such as board or board observer rights, and a list of reserved matters which would require the minority shareholders’ consent. Apart from the shareholders’ agreement, the constitution of a company sets out the contractual relationship among the shareholders inter se and between the shareholders and the company. In addition to the protections available to the shareholders in the constitution and shareholders’ agreement, shareholders of a company may also rely on protections and remedies available under the Companies Act.
In the case of a public listed company, minority shareholders’ protections can be found in the Companies Act, the Code of Corporate Governance, the Listing Manual and the Takeover Code.
There are no specific disclosure obligations for FDI in Singapore. However, general disclosure requirements apply to all persons making, holding or disposing of shares in companies.
Private Company
In the case of a private company incorporated in Singapore, any transfer of shares has to be lodged by the company with ACRA. The information required in such lodgment (including the new shareholder’s identity and shareholding) will be reflected in the company’s electronic register of members and business profile, which is publicly available through ACRA’s business filing portal (the BizFile+ portal).
Public Company Listed on the SGX
In the case of any shareholding in a Singapore company listed on the SGX, there are additional disclosure and reporting obligations under the SFA that apply to a “substantial shareholder” – ie, a shareholder who has an interest or interests in one or more voting shares (excluding treasury shares) in the company – and the percentage of the total votes attached to such shares is not less than 5% of the total votes attached to all voting shares (excluding treasury shares) in the company. These disclosure obligations apply to shareholders who are directly or indirectly holding voting rights in the listed company.
A substantial shareholder is required under the SFA to give a notice in writing to the company within two business days after the substantial shareholder becomes aware that it has become, or has ceased to be, a substantial shareholder. Any change in the percentage level of the substantial shareholder’s interest is also disclosable by the substantial shareholder to the company by notice in writing within two business days after the substantial shareholder becomes aware of the change. Upon receiving such notice, the company is required under the SFA to announce or otherwise disseminate the information stated in the notice to the SGX as soon as practicable and, in any case, no later than the end of the business day following the day on which the company received the notice.
Companies can access funding and financing relatively easily through capital markets and bank financing.
The capital markets in Singapore are primarily regulated by the MAS. The MAS regulates activities such as the offer of securities, including debt and equity securities, to investors in Singapore pursuant to the SFA.
Companies can raise funds via initial public offerings, or if they are listed on the SGX, they can undertake a rights issue or placement of their shares to new investors. Companies that list their securities on the SGX are also regulated by the SGX and are required to comply with the Listing Manual, which comprises the Mainboard Rules and the Catalist Rules.
Unless exempted, all offers of securities must be accompanied by a prospectus and a product highlights sheet registered with the MAS. Such exemptions include:
Companies that list their securities on the SGX are also regulated by the SGX and are required to comply with the Listing Manual.
In relation to foreign investors structured as investment funds and making a foreign direct investment into Singapore, there is generally no requirement for an investment to be reviewed or approved by any Singapore regulatory authority for the sole reason that such investment is from a foreign source. However, foreign investors should note the changes to the investment regime highlighted in 1.2 Regulatory Framework for FDI.
The merger control regime in Singapore is set out in the Competition Act 2004 of Singapore (the “Competition Act”), and the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) is the regulatory body governing merger control regimes.
Generally, unless otherwise exempted or excluded, Singapore prohibits mergers that have resulted, or may be expected to result, in a substantial lessening of competition within any market in Singapore for goods or services (the “Merger Restrictions”).
A merger is deemed to occur where:
The Merger Restrictions apply even if any party to a merger or anticipated merger is outside Singapore or any other matter arising out of such merger is outside Singapore. Accordingly, the merger control regime applies to FDI.
The Merger Restrictions do not apply to any mergers (i) relating to certain specified activity, including licensed postal services and the supply of wastewater management services, and (ii) any merger in which economic efficiencies outweigh the adverse effects of the substantial lessening of competition in the relevant market in Singapore.
Voluntary Notification Regime
It is not mandatory to notify the CCCS of any merger, whether before or after its implementation. It is possible to make the investment first before notifying the CCCS of the merger. However, the risk is that the CCCS may commence investigations if there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that a merger has infringed or that an anticipated merger, if carried into effect, will infringe the Merger Restrictions.
Self-assessment
If the merger is not excluded or exempted under the Competition Act, parties should perform a self-assessment to determine whether the Merger Restrictions may be infringed. The CCCS should be notified if the merged undertaking has a market share of at least 40%, or the post-merger combined market share of the three largest firms are at least 70% and the merged undertaking has a market share of at least 20%.
Confidential advice
Parties may apply to the CCCS for confidential advice on whether an anticipated merger, if carried into effect, is likely to infringe the Merger Restrictions. The advice is non-binding on the CCCS. To be eligible for confidential advice, the parties must intend to carry the anticipated merger into effect and the merger must not be publicly known at the time of application.
Notification
Parties can apply to the CCCS for a formal decision if they consider that the Merger Restrictions may be infringed.
Review
The review of applications to the CCCS for a decision on the merger or anticipated merger is conducted in two phases. The CCCS will first conduct a preliminary assessment (Phase 1 review) based on the information collected during the Phase 1 review period. This is expected to take around 30 working days, and the merger will be cleared at Phase 1 if the CCCS is able to reach a favourable decision. A Phase 2 review is triggered if the CCCS is unable to conclude, during the Phase 1 review period, that the merger does not raise competition concerns. The CCCS will request additional information before conducting a more detailed assessment, which is expected to be completed in 120 working days.
The CCCS assesses whether a merger situation results or may be expected to result in a substantial lessening of competition in a market by comparing the extent of competition in each relevant market if the merger proceeds and if the merger does not proceed.
Factors that the CCCS will consider include:
Remedies can take the form of commitments or directions. Additionally, the CCCS is also able to impose a financial penalty on any of the merger parties. In determining the appropriate remedy, the CCCS will have regard to the principle of proportionality in assessing the effectiveness of different remedies and their associated costs in practice.
Commitments
The CCCS may, at any time, before determining whether the Merger Restrictions have been or will be infringed, accept commitments from the parties to take or refrain from taking such action that it considers appropriate to remedy, mitigate or prevent the substantial lessening of competition.
Directions
Where the CCCS determines that the Merger Restrictions have been or will be infringed, the CCCS may give directions to remedy, mitigate or eliminate the adverse effects of such infringement and prevent its recurrence. Such directions include:
Financial Penalties
The CCCS may impose a financial penalty if it determines that the Merger Restrictions have been infringed intentionally or negligently.
The CCCS may conduct an investigation if there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the Merger Restrictions have been or will be infringed, including where there are substantiated complaints from third parties and via its market intelligence function. The CCCS can accept commitments or impose directions for such infringements, as set out in 6.3 Remedies and Commitments.
Parties may appeal to the Competition Appeal Board against the CCCS’s decision in respect of whether the Merger Restrictions have been or will be infringed, and directions imposed by the CCCS. A further right of appeal exists against the decision of the Competition Appeal Board to the High Court (and subsequently to the Court of Appeal) on any point of law and the amount of financial penalty in relation to such decision.
There is generally no requirement for an investment to be reviewed or approved by any Singapore regulatory authority for the sole reason that such investment is from a foreign source. Please refer to 8.1 Other Regimes for more information on certain key sectors where foreign ownership restrictions apply and 1.2 Regulatory Framework for FDI for changes to the regulatory framework for FDI.
This is not applicable in Singapore.
This is not applicable in Singapore.
This is not applicable in Singapore.
There are laws, regulations and sanctions regimes which may restrict foreign investments in certain key sectors and business activities.
Domestic News Media Sector
Under the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act 1974 of Singapore, unless governmental approval is obtained:
Broadcasting Sector
Under the Broadcasting Act 1994 of Singapore, unless the minister otherwise approves, a company must not be granted or hold a broadcasting licence if:
Other Activities
Singapore has established targeted financial sanctions regimes in respect of designated individuals, entities and activities.
For example, the Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) Act 2002 of Singapore (TSOFA) prohibits certain acts which have the effect of financing terrorism or terrorist acts, such as providing or collecting property with the intention, or knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe, that the property will be used to commit any terrorist act, or using or possessing property for the purpose of facilitating or carrying out a terrorist act. The TSOFA has an extra-territorial effect and may apply to acts committed by any person outside Singapore.
In addition, as a member state of the UN, Singapore is committed to implementing resolutions of the UN Security Council. Some of these resolutions prohibit persons in Singapore from dealing with UN-designated individuals and entities, eg, by providing resources and services for the benefit of such persons, and any FDI to this effect may be subject to sanctions by the MAS.
The main taxes imposed on companies doing business in Singapore are corporate income tax, goods and services tax (GST), and sometimes stamp duty.
Corporate Income Tax
All domestic and foreign companies are subject to tax on all profits that arise or derive from Singapore. Singapore’s corporate tax rate of 17% is considered one of the lowest rates internationally.
For income tax purposes, each partner of a partnership (including a limited partnership and a limited liability partnership) will be taxed on their share of the income from the partnership, based on a personal income tax rate if the partner is an individual, or the tax rate for companies if the partner is a company.
There are various tax incentives administered by different government agencies allowing eligible companies to pay a concessionary tax rate or receive a tax exemption on their qualifying income.
GST
GST is a consumption levied tax on the import of goods and almost all supplies of Singapore. The prevailing GST rate is 9% with effect from 1 January 2024.
Stamp Duty
Stamp duty is imposed on certain instruments prescribed under the Stamp Duties Act 1929 of Singapore (the “Stamp Duties Act”), which include instruments relating to charges over immovable property and shares, transfers of interests in immovable properties in Singapore and transfers of shares. The stamp duty rates vary depending on the type of instrument.
Payments such as interest, royalties, rent for the use of movable properties, and management fees made to non-residents are subject to withholding tax. Singapore does not impose withholding tax on dividends and, thus, dividends paid to foreign corporate shareholders by a company tax resident in Singapore are not subject to tax.
The rates of withholding tax depend on the nature of the income. For example, interest in connection with any loan or indebtedness is subject to withholding tax of 15% or the prevailing corporate tax rate, while income received or earned from the rights to use intellectual property such as copyrights, patents and trade marks are subject to withholding tax of 10% or at the prevailing corporate tax rate.
Withholding tax rates (if payable) may be exempted or subject to a reduction in tax rates under fiscal initiatives, treaty rates or double taxation agreements.
Corporate income tax rebates are available to eligible companies to provide relief for business costs and restructuring. Both domestic and foreign companies (which are not subject to withholding tax) can qualify. Relief from stamp duty may be available for share transfers pursuant to a transfer of assets between associated permitted entities, subject to the conditions for relief being met. The key requirements for relief are that (i) the relevant transferor and transferee companies are closely associated in terms of shareholding and voting rights for a minimum of 12 months, and (ii) the transfers have a bona fide purpose.
Tax incentives, in the form of a concessionary tax rate or tax exemption, are available to eligible companies through schemes such as the Financial Sector Incentive Scheme, the Pioneer Certificate Incentive (PC) and the Development and Expansion Incentive (DEI). An approved company under the PC or DEI is eligible for a corporate tax exemption or a concessionary tax rate of 5% or 10%, respectively, on income derived from qualifying activities.
The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) also set up the M&A Scheme in 2010, which has been extended until 31 December 2025. Under the M&A Scheme, an acquiring company making a qualifying acquisition of the ordinary shares of a target company during the valid period would be granted an M&A allowance, based on the applicable rates during the period in which the qualifying share acquisition is made. Any contract or agreement for the sale of equitable interest in ordinary shares or on any transfer documents for the acquisition of ordinary shares in the M&A Scheme would also be granted stamp duty relief and double tax deduction on transaction costs, subject to terms and conditions.
Capital gains derived by a foreign investor from the sale or other disposition of FDI are not subject to tax in Singapore.
Singapore’s general anti-avoidance rules (GAAR) are found in Section 33 of the Income Tax Act. Similar provisions exist in the GST Act and the Stamp Duties Act. Whether there is tax avoidance is dependent on the facts of each case; this would involve an enquiry into the subjective motive of the taxpayer for entering into the arrangement and subjective consequences sought, as well as the manner in which the arrangement is carried out in the light of the specific legislative provision. According to the IRAS, examples of tax avoidance arrangements falling within Section 33 of the Income Tax Act are:
Transfer pricing rules apply to transactions between two related parties to ensure that the parties are taxed based on an arm’s length value of the transaction. Related parties are parties where one party directly or indirectly controls the other, or where both parties are directly or indirectly controlled by a common third party. This definition is construed broadly to include relationships between resident entities and non-resident affiliates. Where the pricing of a related-party transaction is not made at arm’s length and results in reduced profit for the Singapore taxpayer, the IRAS may adjust the profit of the taxpayer upwards.
Overview
The Employment Act is the main employment legislation in Singapore and applies to most employees (except for seafarers, domestic workers, statutory board employees and civil servants) working under a contract of service with an employer.
The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) also issues guidelines and advisories to supplement the law. While these guidelines and advisories are generally non-binding, the MOM may take action against employers for non-compliance.
Notably, the Tripartite Guidelines on Fair Employment Practices (TGFEP), which primarily seek to protect workers against discrimination based on age, race, gender, religion, marital status and family responsibilities or disability, will be enshrined in law. Currently, non-compliance with the TGFEP may result in the prosecution of the employer and/or key personnel and/or the debarment from making or renewing work pass applications for up to two years.
On 4 August 2023, the MOM announced that it has accepted the final set of recommendations by the Tripartite Committee on Workplace Fairness for the Workplace Fairness Legislation (WFL). The WFL is Singapore’s first workplace fairness law and is slated to be passed in due course. The key thrusts of the recommendations of the Tripartite Committee on Workplace Fairness are as follows:
When enacted, the WFL will likely complement, and not replace, the TGFEP.
Trade Unions and Collective Bargaining
According to the MOM’s website, at the time of writing, there are approximately 65 registered trade unions in Singapore.
Only trade unions recognised by the employer under the Industrial Relations Act 1960 of Singapore (IRA) can represent their members in collective bargaining. The collective bargaining process may be initiated by the trade union or the employer. Pursuant to Section 25 of the IRA, a collective agreement should be valid for at least two years but not more than three years, from the date on which it is expressed to commence, and must be filed to the Industrial Arbitration Court (IAC) within one week of signing. If a collective agreement cannot be concluded, the trade union or the employer may request for conciliation assistance from the MOM. Disputes which are unresolved through conciliation may be escalated to the IAC for arbitration.
Employees are generally compensated through cash and statutory benefits such as paid sick leave and hospitalisation leave. Some employers may offer equity compensation, such as the grant of employee share options or share award plans. The vesting of the options granted under the share options or share award plans may be accelerated as a result of an acquisition of the employer.
Share Sale
In the context of an acquisition of a company incorporated in Singapore by way of a transfer of shares, the completion of such acquisition should not have an impact on the employment contract between the target company and its employees. The rights available to an employee of the target company would continue to be effective against the target company.
Business Transfer
In the context of a business transfer (including the disposal of business as a going concern and a transfer effected by sale, amalgamation, merger, reconstruction or operation of law), Section 18A of the Employment Act sets out the protection for employees affected by the business transfer. Where this Section applies, the outgoing employer has an obligation to, amongst other things, notify and consult with the affected employees and their trade union as soon as it is reasonable and before the business transfer. The employment of affected employees will be automatically transferred with the business, and their employment terms, including compensation, will remain the same unless otherwise agreed upon by the employees or the trade union.
Intellectual property is generally not an important aspect of screening FDI in Singapore. Please refer to 7.1 Applicable Regulator and Process Overview for a summary of FDI screening in Singapore.
Intellectual Property Protections in Singapore
Singapore is considered to have strong intellectual property protections, with international surveys consistently ranking Singapore’s intellectual property regime as among the best in the world.
Limitations
There may be difficulty obtaining protection for certain intellectual property. For example, under the Patents Act, an invention which would be generally expected to encourage offensive, immoral or anti-social behaviour is not a patentable invention. This is a broad limitation and might possibly extend to, for example, pharmaceutical products relating to genetic manipulations that raise safety concerns. Similarly, trade marks that are contrary to public policy or morality may not be registered under the Trade Marks Act.
Specific Laws and Regulations
The PDPA establishes general data protection and data privacy laws, and regulates the collection, use, disclosure and processing of personal data in Singapore. In addition to the PDPA, subsidiary legislation, such as the Personal Data Protection Regulations 2014, has been enacted to govern data protection in Singapore.
Extraterritorial Scope
The PDPA applies to organisations which collect, use or disclose personal data within Singapore. The definition of “organisation” under the PDPA is broad and includes any individual, company, association, or body of persons, corporate or unincorporated, whether or not formed or recognised under the law of Singapore, or resident or having an office or place of business in Singapore. Accordingly, the PDPA has an extraterritorial scope that could extend to a foreign investor in its home jurisdiction.
Enforcement
There is a strong enforcement focus for these laws, with the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) being established under the PDPA for the purpose of administering and enforcing the PDPA. The PDPC has a wide discretion to issue remedial directions as it thinks fit, including requiring an organisation to stop collecting and using personal data in contravention of the PDPA, and to destroy personal data collected in contravention of the PDPA.
The PDPC may also require an organisation to pay a financial penalty of up to 10% of the annual turnover in Singapore of the organisation (if such annual turnover exceeds SGD10 million) or SGD1 million, with the maximum amount varying depending on factors such as the provision of the PDPA that is contravened. The PDPC must consider certain factors when determining the amount of penalty imposed, including the nature and gravity of the non-compliance, the type and nature of the personal data affected, and whether the organisation had previously failed to comply with the PDPA. Additionally, non-compliance with certain provisions of the PDPA may constitute a criminal offence and may result in imprisonment.
The decisions relating to organisations found to have contravened their obligations under the PDPA are also published publicly on the PDPC’s website.
10 Collyer Quay
Tenth Floor Ocean Financial Centre
Singapore 049315
+65 6535 0733
+65 6535 4906
mail@drewnapier.com www.drewnapier.comIntroduction
In recent years, Singapore has witnessed a transformative shift in its regulatory landscape, marked by a concerted effort to enhance sustainability practices and embrace digital innovation.
The co-ordinated initiative to improve sustainability practices reflects a growing recognition of the importance of ESG factors in corporate performance and risk management. As more businesses are compelled to provide transparent and comparable sustainability data, such businesses are not only held accountable to regulators and investors but are also encouraged to adopt more responsible practices that align with global sustainability goals.
The move to go digital through the introduction of the digitalisation of document verification also represents a marked improvement in terms of operational efficiency and security in business transactions. This initiative will streamline the authentication process for essential documents, allowing companies to engage in faster and more reliable cross-border transactions.
On the regulatory front, concerns arising out of the “Income-Allianz” deal, including those regarding Income Insurance’s ability to fulfil its social mission if the deal went through, contributed to the Singapore Parliament passing the Insurance (Amendment) Bill on 16 October 2024. While there may be concerns that this may negatively impact Singapore’s reputation as an open, rules-based and pro-enterprise business hub, the Second Minister of Finance, Chee Hong Tat, stressed that Singapore remains committed to maintaining this reputation. In this connection, the Insurance (Amendment) Bill was specifically devised to target an insurer that is either a co-operative or linked to a co-operative, which helps to limit the impact on the larger insurance market.
The legal landscape in Singapore for 2025 is set to undergo continued transformation. Together, these initiatives and developments reflect an approach to governance that prioritises sustainability, accountability and innovation ‒ key pillars for navigating the complexities of modern business in an increasingly interconnected world. As these changes take effect, more businesses will need to adapt to new compliance requirements, ultimately contributing to a more resilient and responsible economic landscape.
Sustainability Reporting
Following the conclusion of the public consultation by the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority of Singapore (ACRA) and the Singapore Exchange Regulation (SGX RegCo) on recommendations to advance climate reporting in Singapore, ACRA and SGX RegCo have announced that, beginning in the financial year (FY) 2025, the latest international standards, the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards issued by the International Sustainability Standards Board, will be integrated into the existing climate reporting framework. This is part of Singapore’s broader commitment to enhancing corporate sustainability practices.
The IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards cover three categories of emissions:
This improved regime will be rolled out in phases, which aims to ease the transition for companies, particularly smaller ones. From FY2025, all listed issuers must report and file climate disclosures including Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Larger non-listed issuers, with annual revenues of at least SGD1 billion and total assets of at least SGD500 million, will have to make similar disclosures from FY2027. Furthermore, all climate-related disclosures must align with the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards.
SGX RegCo recognises the challenges smaller issuers may face in measuring and reporting Scope 3 emissions, which are more complex and variable than Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. Accordingly, the focus will initially be on larger issuers by market capitalisation, who will be expected to report on their Scope 3 emissions from FY2026. Larger non-listed companies are not required to report on their Scope 3 emissions at least until FY2029.
To give issuers ample time to prepare for climate-related disclosures in FY2025, the reporting of the following key components will only become mandatory starting in FY2026:
By adopting these international standards, Singapore aims to foster a low-carbon economy and enhance corporate responsibility. This proactive approach not only addresses growing global concerns about climate change but also encourages businesses to integrate sustainable practices into their operations, ultimately contributing to promoting globally consistent and comparable sustainability disclosures.
Multinational Enterprise (Minimum Tax) Bill
The Multinational Enterprise (Minimum Tax) Bill (the “MEMT Bill”) was read the second time and passed in Parliament on 15 October 2024 and implements top-up taxes as part of the BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two initiative, to which Singapore is a signatory. The two new top-up taxes consist of:
The MTT and DTT broadly aim to ensure a minimum effective tax rate globally and are generally applicable to multinational enterprise groups (MNE Groups) with annual revenues of at least EUR750 million, in at least two of the four preceding financial years. The MTT and DTT are scheduled to take effect from the MNE Groups’ financial years which commence on or after 1 January 2025. The applicability of MTT and DTT is set out broadly below.
The Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR) is another component of BEPS 2.0, which allows a country to increase taxes payable by a business if that business is part of a larger group that pays less than the proposed global minimum tax of 15% in another jurisdiction. However, it has not been included in the MEMT Bill, which prioritises the implementation of the DTT and MTT with plans to address the UTPR at a later stage.
These top-up taxes seek to introduce Pillar Two of BEPS 2.0 in Singapore, which aims to ensure that a global minimum effective tax rate of 15% is applicable globally to such MNE Groups. Notwithstanding the concern that these new taxes could deter MNE Groups from establishing their businesses in Singapore, Singapore has introduced initiatives such as the Refundable Investment Credit to maintain global competitiveness, encourage new investments and support research and innovation activities in the country.
Digital Authentication Under the e-Apostille Framework
Starting in 2025, the Singapore Academy of Law (SAL) will take steps to eliminate the need for the public to present physical documents for authentication for overseas use. This process will be digitised in collaboration with the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA), enhancing efficiency, security and reliability in document verification.
Under the new system, individuals can upload their documents online via the SAL Legalisation Portal for digital verification, costing SGD10 (before GST) per document, which is the same as the current physical authentication fee. Once verification is successful, a digital certificate of authenticity, known as an e-Apostille, will be emailed promptly. However, the SAL will continue to issue physical Apostilles as required.
Documents issued by ACRA, such as business profiles and business certificates, will be included in the first phase of the e-Apostille framework. The business profiles and business certificates, which provide basic information about a Singapore-registered entity and certify its registration with ACRA, respectively, are crucial for various business-related activities that require verified information about the business and its stakeholders. Prior to issuing the e-Apostille certification, the e-Apostille system will utilise ACRA’s trustBar verification service to confirm the authenticity of business profiles and business certificates.
The first phase of the new system focuses on improving the efficiency of authenticating approximately half of all documents, as ACRA documents account for this significant portion of submissions for legalisation. The digital authentication of documents issued by other public authorities will be implemented in subsequent phases.
The e-Apostille Framework is based on the World Wide Web Consortium’s Verifiable Credentials, positioning Singapore as one of the first countries worldwide to digitally authenticate public documents. This advancement is expected to optimise processes and align with international standards, facilitating safer and more efficient commercial transactions. According to Leong Der Yao, Assistant Chief Executive of IMDA, the World Wide Web Consortium’s Verifiable Credentials standard will enhance international co-operation and trade by ensuring global recognition of Singapore-issued e-Apostilles.
The introduction of the e-Apostille system in Singapore is poised to reduce the time required in connection with the document verification process, and is expected to enhance cross-border corporate and commercial transactions. By digitising the authentication of essential documents such as business profiles and business certificates, the new framework streamlines the verification process, reducing the time and administrative burden typically associated with document legalisation. This efficiency adds to Singapore’s reputation as an innovative and efficient business hub.
As Singapore continues to invest in robust digital infrastructure, the potential for innovation expands exponentially. The creation of a conducive environment for digitalisation ensures that businesses can leverage new technologies to enhance productivity and competitiveness. This digital ecosystem not only supports local enterprises but also positions Singapore as a key player in the global digital economy. Looking ahead, it is anticipated that more initiatives will emerge as Singapore strives to maintain its leadership in digital transformation.
Insurance (Amendment) Bill
The Insurance Act 1966 of Singapore requires that a person who intends obtain effect control of a licensed insurer incorporated in Singapore must obtain the prior written authority of Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). In this connection, the Insurance (Amendment) Bill was passed on 16 October 2024 to allow MAS to consider the views of the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) when approving such proposed transactions which involve an insurer that is either a co-operative or linked to one.
Currently, MAS assesses an application only on prudential grounds which includes the financial strength and track record of the applicant. The passing of this Bill authorises MAS to also consider the views of MCCY in transactions involving insurers that are either a co-operative or linked to one.
The Insurance (Amendment) Bill was tabled on an urgent basis due to concerns arising out of the “Income-Allianz” deal, including those regarding Income Insurance’s ability to fulfil its social mission if the deal went through.
While there may be concerns that this may negatively impact Singapore’s reputation as an open, rules-based and pro-enterprise business hub, the Second Minister of Finance, Chee Hong Tat, has emphasised that Singapore remains committed to maintaining this reputation. In this connection, that the Insurance (Amendment) Bill was specifically devised to target an insurer that is either a co-operative or linked to a co-operative, which helps to limit the impact on the larger insurance market.
Outlook for 2025
The global economic outlook for 2025 presents an optimistic scenario, with the International Monetary Fund projecting global GDP growth to be approximately 3.2%. This marks a slight increase from 3.1% in 2024, reflecting a gradual recovery from the impacts of previous economic disruptions. Key factors contributing to this growth include easing inflation rates, which are expected to decline from 6.9% in 2023 to around 3.4% by 2025, aided by tight monetary policies and reduced pressures from energy and goods prices.
Singapore’s central bank has maintained its current monetary policy, anticipating that the country’s core inflation will decline to around 2% by the end of 2024. The International Monetary Fund also forecasts that Singapore’s economic growth will continue to accelerate, reaching 2.3% in 2025, up from 1.1% in 2023. Emerging markets within South-East Asia are also likely to experience accelerated growth, supported by increased trade and investment flows. The positive trajectory of Singapore’s economy, alongside improvements across neighbouring countries, signals a robust regional outlook for 2025, fostering optimism about sustainable economic development and resilience against future challenges.
10 Collyer Quay
Tenth Floor Ocean Financial Centre
Singapore 049315
+65 6535 0733
+65 6535 4906
mail@drewnapier.com www.drewnapier.com