Private Wealth 2025

Last Updated August 12, 2025

Germany

Law and Practice

Authors



Flick Gocke Schaumburg has seven offices in Germany – in Bonn, Frankfurt am Main, Hamburg, Berlin, Munich, Stuttgart and Düsseldorf. With more than 50 years’ experience in the field, the firm combines outstanding expertise in German and international tax law with specialist know-how in other relevant areas of business law. Flick Gocke Schaumburg advises on national and international mergers and acquisitions, disposals, venture capital and private equity transactions, and complex restructurings; it also provides comprehensive advice to high net worth individuals, family-owned businesses, foundations and non-profit organisations on all tax and legal issues related to wealth management and succession. The firm’s client roster is currently in excess of 2,000, including the majority of DAX-listed companies. In terms of tax crime and white-collar matters, Flick Gocke Schaumburg covers the entire spectrum, from risk assessments to representation in criminal proceedings.

Income Tax

Germany imposes a federal personal income tax on the worldwide income of resident individuals, under the Income Tax Act (ITA). Resident corporations, associations and certain segregated pools of assets are subject to federal corporate income tax, under the Corporate Income Tax Act (CITA). Both taxes are levied annually.

An individual who has a place of residence or a place of habitual abode in Germany has a worldwide income tax liability, pursuant to Section 1(1) of the ITA. While a place of residence is defined as the possession of a property with the intention to occupy (not necessarily on a full-time basis), a place of habitual abode is where the taxpayer remains for more than six months.

Non-resident individuals are subject to income tax from certain German sources specified in Section 49 of the ITA, especially on income derived from German real estate.

The following types of income are subject to income tax pursuant to Section 2(1) of the ITA:

  • income from farming and forestry;
  • business income;
  • income from self-employment;
  • employment income;
  • income from capital assets;
  • rental income; and
  • other types of income listed in Section 22 of the ITA.

There are specific rules for each category, which regulate the types of expenses that may be deducted and the tax-free allowance available for those categories. Gains on the sale of privately held assets are subject to income tax under Section 22 of the ITA if they have been held for less than ten years in the case of real estate, or one year in the case of other assets.

In calculating the individual’s taxable income, the income from each of the above categories is added together, and losses can be deducted. There are provisions by which losses can be carried backwards or forwards. A taxpayer can deduct special expenses such as pension contributions, health insurance, school fees and charitable donations, and extraordinary expenses such as the cost of medical treatment (in each case, up to a prescribed threshold). There are also tax reliefs for those with children, and rules that allow married couples and registered partnerships to be taxed jointly. A special tax regime applies to income from capital assets, which is subject to withholding tax at a rate of 25% and is not subject to supplementary taxation at the taxpayer’s usual rate.

The income tax rates for 2025 are as follows:

  • the tax-free personal allowance includes income up to EUR12,096 per annum;
  • the tax rate for income above EUR12,096 per annum starts at 14% and increases up to 45% for income above EUR277,826 per annum; and
  • in addition to income tax, a solidarity surcharge will be levied as a separate tax, at a rate of 5.5% of the definite income tax liability – this solidarity surcharge applies only to taxpayers with an annual income tax liability amounting to more than EUR19,950 (for a single person) and to income from capital assets.

Corporations and other types of legal entities listed in Section 1(1) of the CITA are subject to corporation tax on their worldwide profits if their place of management or registered office is in Germany. Non-resident legal entities are subject to corporate tax from certain German sources mentioned in Section 2 of the CITA in connection with Section 49 of the ITA.

Partnerships are not subject to corporation tax, but the partners are individually subject to income tax. Partnerships may choose to be taxed as a corporation and for their partners to be taxed as shareholders of a corporation. Corporation tax is levied on a corporation’s income, which is determined in accordance with the income schedules in Section 2(1) of the ITA, as mentioned above (the CITA refers comprehensively to provisions of the ITA that deal with determining the income). After the deduction of any available allowance, profits are subject to corporate tax at a rate of 15% (plus the solidarity surcharge of 5.5% of the corporate tax liability).

Exit Tax

If an individual of any nationality who has been resident or has had a place of habitual abode in Germany for at least seven out of the last 12 years emigrates, the unrealised gain on any shareholding in excess of 1% will be charged to income tax, according to Section 6 of the German Foreign Tax Act (FTA). However, the exit tax lapses with retroactive effect upon the re-establishment of German unlimited tax liability for a maximum period of 12 years (“temporary absence”). A limited tax deferral is possible in this case. The current FTA exit taxation regime has applied since 1 January 2022. Following the amendment, the payment can now be made in seven interest-free instalments.

The German tax authorities published a decree in 2025 on the application of the returnee provision above in cases of substantial distributions from the shareholding covered by the FTA. Distributions made after 16 August 2023 by corporations whose shareholders are subject to exit taxation trigger immediate exit taxation regarding the shares if the distributions exceed one quarter of the fair market value of the corporation.

In 2023, a 2011 relocation case to Switzerland that applied the previous legislation, which did not provide for a permanent, interest-free tax deferral for relocations to non-EU/EEA countries, was ruled on by the Federal Fiscal Court, which held that such a tax deferral is applicable. Therefore, the Federal Fiscal Court is expected to rule in favour of a permanent, interest-free tax deferral in EU/EEA cases. The German tax authorities issued a decree in 2025 that the ruling will only be applied to relocation cases to Switzerland prior to 2022.

However, no adaptation of the current exit taxation is in sight. Moreover, the German tax authorities published a decree in 2023 on the application of the exit tax: in the case of temporary absence, the exit tax only lapses with retroactive effect if Germany’s right of taxation is directly re-established exactly at the time of departure.

If a German citizen who has been an income tax resident in Germany for at least five of the last ten years moves to a country that is classified as a low-tax jurisdiction while retaining significant economic interests in Germany, the individual will be subject to extended limited income tax liability for ten years. This means that the individual will be subject to German income tax on a more extensive list of German income sources than other non-residents. Furthermore, extended limited inheritance tax liability will apply for the same period. If the emigrant makes gifts or dies during this period, the class of assets that are treated as German assets (and therefore subject to inheritance tax even if the donor and donee are non-resident) is widened, pursuant to Section 4 of the FTA. This is in addition to the standard five-year inheritance tax shadow.

A further German exit tax may be triggered if, for example, a limited partner of a German GmbH & Co KG that does not qualify as a permanent establishment under the relevant double tax treaty terminates their German residence.

The rules imposing ongoing tax liabilities on emigrants are subject to the application of any relevant double tax treaty in Germany’s wide treaty network.

In 2024, Germany also introduced an exit tax on interest and shares in investment funds in case the historic acquisition costs per fund unit/share class exceeds the amount of EUR500,000. The above rules on the deferral of payment of the exit tax apply also to the exit tax in shares of investment funds. These new provisions in the German Investment Tax Act are applicable to cases from 31 December 2024.

Gift and Inheritance Tax

General tax principles

Transfers at death and gratuitous transfers are subject to federal inheritance and gift tax under the Inheritance and Gift Tax Act (IGTA).

In Germany, the estate is not subject to inheritance tax, but the acquisition of the respective heir or legatee is; they are ultimately liable for tax on their individual share of the estate. Inheritance tax also depends on the family relationship between the decedent and the heirs.

Gift tax is levied on gratuitous transfers. Like inheritance tax, it is based on the concept of the accretion of wealth or enrichment. Only transfers that are not contingent on future events and that result in a present benefit to the transferee are taxable. While income tax employs factual criteria such as so-called economic ownership (beneficial ownership) in addition to legal criteria to identify taxable transfers, inheritance and gift tax takes a more formal approach. As a rule, a taxable transfer requires the transferee to obtain legal title to the property or at least an enforceable claim under private law.

Gift tax complements inheritance tax. Therefore, gratuitous transfers and transfers at death by an individual to the same recipient within ten years are aggregated into one transfer. Likewise, the same tax rates and tax-free allowances apply to gratuitous transfers and transfers at death.

There is an unlimited, extended unlimited, limited or extended limited gift or inheritance tax liability in Germany.

The (extended) unlimited inheritance and gift tax liability applies especially if the deceased/donor or the heir/legatee/donee has a residence or habitual abode in Germany or is a German citizen who left Germany for not more than five years (ten years in the case of Germany–USA).

In 2022, the Federal Fiscal Court ruled that the extended unlimited inheritance and gift tax liability does not violate the principle of equality, the freedom to leave the country or the free movement of capital.

The limited inheritance and gift tax liability is applicable if a person who lives abroad has, for example, an interest in a German partnership with business assets, or holds a share of at least 10% in a German corporation (alone or with other closely related persons).

The extended limited inheritance and gift tax liability can be relevant for Germans who had unlimited income tax liability for at least five of the last ten years before leaving Germany.

After deducting the tax-free allowance, the tax rate applicable to the gift or inheritance is as follows.

  • Gifts and inheritances of up to EUR75,000 are taxed at a rate of:
    1. 7% in Tax Class I;
    2. 15% in Tax Class II; and
    3. 30% in Tax Class III.
  • Gifts and inheritances between EUR75,000 and EUR300,000 are taxed at a rate of:
    1. 11% in Tax Class I;
    2. 20% in Tax Class II; and
    3. 30% in Tax Class III.
  • Gifts and inheritances between EUR300,001 and EUR600,000 are taxed at a rate of:
    1. 15% in Tax Class I;
    2. 25% in Tax Class II; and
    3. 30% in Tax Class III.
  • Gifts and inheritances between EUR600,001 and EUR6 million are taxed at a rate of:
    1. 19% in Tax Class I;
    2. 30% in Tax Class II; and
    3. 30% in Tax Class III.
  • Gifts and inheritances between EUR6,000,001 and EUR13 million are taxed at a rate of:
    1. 23% in Tax Class I;
    2. 35% in Tax Class II; and
    3. 50% in Tax Class III.
  • Gifts and inheritances between EUR13,000,001 and EUR26 million are taxed at a rate of:
    1. 27% in Tax Class I;
    2. 40% in Tax Class II; and
    3. 50% in Tax Class III.
  • Any gifts and inheritances of more than EUR26 million are taxed at a rate of:
    1. 30% in Tax Class I;
    2. 43% in Tax Class II; and
    3. 50% in Tax Class III.

As soon as the respective amount is exceeded, the entire amount is subject to the relevant tax rate.

If neither the donor nor the donee has a place of residence or habitual abode in Germany, the tax-free allowances may be reduced by a partial amount. Pursuant to Section 16(2) of the IGTA, the tax-free amount is to be granted pro rata when only part of the acquisition is subject to the limited tax liability. Previous pecuniary benefits accrued by the same person within ten years must also be included in the calculation of the specific allowance.

Germany has double tax treaties that cover inheritance taxes with five other countries. Furthermore, Section 21 of the German Inheritance Tax Act provides for foreign estate taxes on foreign property to be credited against the German inheritance tax liability when the donor/decedent or the donee/heir has their residence or place of habitual abode in Germany or opts to be treated as being resident in Germany.

Tax-Free Allowances

Spouses, children and stepchildren, grandchildren, other descendants or (in the case of inheritance upon death) parents or grandparents, fall within Tax Class I, under which:

  • spouses have a gift and inheritance tax allowance of EUR500,000;
  • children or stepchildren have a gift and inheritance tax allowance of EUR400,000;
  • grandchildren have a gift and inheritance tax allowance of EUR200,000; and
  • other descendants, parents or grandparents have a gift and inheritance tax allowance of EUR100,000.

Tax Class II includes parents or grandparents (in the case of a lifetime gift), siblings, nieces or nephews, step-parents, sons- or daughters-in-law, mothers- or fathers-in-law and former spouses, all of whom have an allowance of EUR20,000.

Other donees, such as trusts, fall within Tax Class III and have an allowance of EUR20,000. This allowance is granted once within ten years for the same donor and testator.

Tax Exemption Concerning Family Home

The family home can be transferred tax-free between living spouses without any restrictions. There is no inheritance tax on a transfer of the family home between spouses, and there is an exemption for the first 200 square metres of a family home transferred on death to the decedent’s children. However, the tax on a transfer on death can be clawed back if the property is sold or let within ten years.

Transfer of Business Assets, Agricultural or Forestry Property and Capital Interests

Special treatment applies to business assets, agricultural or forestry property, and capital interests in corporations. Two levels of relief are available for the transfer of business assets, agricultural or forestry property and capital interests, each with different conditions attached.

Relief of 85%

This is subject to the conditions that:

•       the donee retains the property for five years; and

  • the total sum of salaries paid during that period is at least 400% of the annual average for the five years before the gift or inheritance (ie, previous employment levels must be largely maintained).

If there are more than five but fewer than ten employees, the total sum of salaries must be 250% of the annual average for the five years before; if there are more than ten but fewer than 15 employees, it must be 300%.

Relief of 100%

This is subject to the more stringent conditions that:

  • the donee retains the property for seven years;
  • the total sum of salaries paid during that period is at least 700% of the annual average for the seven years before the gift or inheritance (500% if there are more than five but fewer than ten employees, and 565% if there are more than ten but fewer than 15 employees); and
  • no more than 20% of the value is attributable to assets under administration.

Relief depending on value

This relief cannot be claimed independently of the value of the acquired business assets. A particularly complex tax system applies if the value of the acquired business assets exceeds EUR26 million (all acquired business assets of the deceased/donor within a ten-year period have to be taken into account). According to the “ablation model”, the relief is reduced by 1% for each EUR750,000 by which the amount exceeds EUR26 million.

Above EUR90 million, the relief for business assets can no longer be claimed. If the value of the acquired assets exceeds EUR90 million or the transferee opts not to use the ablation model, they can only apply for an examination of need for relief. The transferee is not required to use “privileged” business assets, but they have to use 50% of the value of all other assets that they already own or that they acquire within a ten-year period to pay the regular rate on the privileged business assets.

They also have to use 50% of the value of the management assets that they already own or acquire within a ten-year period to pay the regular rate for business assets. The total rate for acquired assets that do not qualify as privileged business assets can be 80% or more. This makes tax planning complicated for entrepreneurs if the value of the privileged business assets exceeds EUR26 million.

Management assets

So-called management assets within the preferential business assets are fully taxable at the regular rate insofar as the value of such assets exceeds 10% of the acquired company’s assets. The management assets will be calculated and totalled at the group company level (consolidated appraisal of management assets). Therefore, all management assets in the company and its subsidiaries will be taken into consideration and must be valued.

Special Tax Relief for Family Businesses

The maximum special tax relief for family businesses is an additional 30%. There are special requirements for the articles of incorporation that have to be fulfilled (eg, limitation on disposal and on distributions or withdrawals). These provisions have to be incorporated in the articles of incorporation two years before the relevant transfer, and have to remain unchanged and respected for the subsequent 20 years. Family businesses are therefore advised to examine their articles of incorporation and amend them if their provisions do not meet the special requirements of tax relief for family businesses.

Transfer of Real Estate Property and Art

In principle, a 10% tax relief for gifts and inheritances is available for personally held real estate that is let for residential purposes and that is located in Germany, the EU or the EEA. Since 2024, the relief also applies to properties in non-EU/EEA countries that exchange inheritance and gift tax information with Germany.

There are also up to 100% reliefs for loss-making property or assets of artistic, historical or scientific importance, provided that the donee retains the property for ten years and additional conditions are fulfilled.

Tax Step-Up for Family Partnerships

Real estate that is privately held for more than ten years can be transferred to asset management limited partnerships without triggering income tax. The transferred real estate receives a step-up in basis to its fair market value. The step-up allows an additional depreciation volume for income tax purposes, and it can be repeated after ten years.

The limited inheritance and gift tax liability is applicable when a non-resident, non-citizen directly owns real estate situated in Germany. The same applies to German real estate held via a partnership. However, a ruling of the German fiscal court held that a bequest of German real estate was not subject to limited inheritance tax liability. Following the ruling, the German legislature amended the IGTA to put domestic and foreign legatees on an equal footing.

Liabilities linked to the real estate may be deducted from the taxable acquisition. In the case of limited tax liability, a pro rata deduction of debts and encumbrances has been possible since 2024, even if they are not economically related to assets that are subject to limited tax liability.

The transfer of foreign corporations holding German real estate is not subject to German inheritance and gift tax. Rental income derived from German real estate is generally subject to German income tax.

The German transfer tax regime is currently in a rather stable phase. Germany elected a new federal parliament (Bundestag) in 2025, with a government led by the Christian Democratic Union. So far, no major changes in transfer taxes have been announced. Like many other countries, Germany is still facing the consequences of the war in Ukraine; hence, changes might be expected.

Moreover, it remains unclear if the gift and inheritance tax exemptions for business assets are constitutional. It can be expected that within the next two years the German Federal Constitutional Court will render a decision in this regard.

Since July 2020, there has been a reporting obligation for cross-border tax arrangements in Germany. Moreover, there is a publicly accessible transparency register in Germany. German-registered commercial partnerships and legal persons governed by German private law, as well as German-based trustees, must report their beneficial owners or beneficiaries.

The transfer of assets through generations is regularly performed with control rights in favour of older generations, especially if minors or inexperienced persons are involved. The donor of such assets can retain a usufruct right on the transferred assets, so that they can claim the emoluments of the assets after the transfer. The withholding of a usufruct right is an estate planning strategy that has been practised for hundreds of years.

The insertion of broad reclaim regulations in gift agreements or the appointment of executors in last wills, as well as the establishment of binding partnership structures, are used to divide control and wealth.

Advising high net worth individuals and their families has become an international matter, as younger generations are often not as deeply rooted in their native countries as former generations were. Nowadays, family members frequently change their life circumstances in accordance with their study and business plans, and it is not rare for children of high net worth individuals who have spent several years abroad to be married to partners of other nationalities. Consequently, estate structuring requires the interaction of estate planning teams from different jurisdictions.

One of the major issues in this area concerns exit tax planning. The cross-border donation of business assets can trigger gift tax as well as exit tax. Management holding partnerships are used in an effort to combat this tax burden.

The German forced heirship regime depends on the applicable succession law. The EU Directive on succession has been applicable since 17 August 2015, meaning that in principle the succession law of the last habitual residence of the deceased applies. However, the testator has the right to opt for the laws of the testator’s citizenship in the testator’s last will. If the testator had their last domicile in Germany or was a German national and chooses the German law of succession, the German succession law is applicable for their entire estate.

In 2022, the German Federal Court ruled that German forced heirship law was applicable even though the testator, an English national, had chosen English law to govern their succession. Here, the last habitual residence of the testator was in Germany and hence German law of succession was generally applicable. According to the German Federal Court, the choice of English law was (partially) in violation of the German ordre public, since the English law of succession does not provide for any kinds of forced heirship rights. Therefore, the choice of English law was (partially) invalid and, consequently, German forced heirship law was applied.

According to German succession law, descendants, spouses and parents may have a forced heirship right in the amount of 50% of their potential heirship share, according to the rules of intestate succession. The basis of the calculation is the estate at the time of death.

A so-called supplementary statutory share may also apply, since the testator will not be able to avoid forced heirship rights by minimising their estate through donations to third parties within a period of ten years before their death. For calculating the supplementary statutory share, the value of the decedent’s estate will be increased by the value of such donations. The donations will be fully taken into account within the first year prior to the decedent’s death, and will be taken into account by one tenth less for each further year prior to the decedent’s death.

The German statutory matrimonial property regime is the regime of accrued gains if the spouses have not entered into a marital contract. The spouses are allowed to modify their statutory matrimonial property regime, or choose the regime of community property, or the regime of separation of property. However, the matrimonial property regime can only be modified or chosen by marital contract.

If the matrimonial regime of accrued gains applies, each spouse’s assets remain the property of the respective spouse regardless of whether they were acquired before or during the marriage. In the case of divorce or the death of one of the spouses, or if the matrimonial regime is changed to the separation of property, the spouses must equalise their accrued gains made during the marriage. For the calculation of accrued gains, the period between the day of marriage and the day the matrimonial regime ends is decisive. According to that, the amount to be paid due to the equalisation has to be determined by comparing the initial assets (ie, the assets at the time the spouses entered into the marriage) with the final assets of each spouse (especially on the day the divorce petition was delivered to the respondent).

Gratuitous transfers from a spouse to a third party will be taken into account for the calculation, unless they were performed more than ten years ago or were performed with the other spouse’s consent. Otherwise, such transfers will be added to the initial assets of the respective spouse.

In general, there are no differences between assets transferred during lifetime or at death. For income tax purposes, assets are also held with their updated historical acquisition costs after the transfer. Donees/heirs carry forward these historical costs, instead of the donor/decedent. The transfer itself usually does not trigger capital gains tax or exit taxes; therefore, no step-up occurs.

The gift and inheritance tax-free allowances listed under Section 16 of the IGTA are available every ten years. If estate planning is started at an early stage of the donor’s/testator’s life, these tax-free allowances can be utilised multiple times as donations are made over several decades. If the donor decides to donate profitable assets such as shares or rented real estate, they can make a gift while retaining a usufruct right. However, this usufruct right is taken into consideration when determining the value of the transfer of assets.

Family limited partnerships are used as tax-planning mechanisms, making the children of the donor/testator limited partners in this structure. The main benefit of such a structure is that the donor/testator can divide controlling rights to ease their children into the responsibilities of wealth management and limit their initial involvement in the operations of the structure, while at the same time retaining a large degree of control over the partnership structure. As limited partners, the children of the donor/testator have no ability to control, direct or otherwise influence the operations of the partnership structure.

Prenuptial and postnuptial agreements can also be a tax-efficient tool for transfers between spouses.

The digital estate is an interplay of inheritance law, fundamental rights, privacy and business practices of service providers. In Germany, there are only a few judicial verdicts in relation to the digital estate, so many legal issues are still unclear and somewhat controversial. There is no problem when the data is on a device such as a USB stick or a hard disk, as these objects are transferred by way of universal succession to the heirs.

A problem arises when the data is stored online – eg, on a cloud or in an online account. There is no agreement in the literature on whether digital assets should be included in the inheritance, as they are personal assets; it is argued that accounts and data of a private nature are not inheritable. According to the prevailing opinion in the relevant literature, the digital estate should be inheritable.

In a ruling in 2018, the German Supreme Court decided that the heirs were entitled to access the Facebook account of the deceased. The account would also be transferred to the heirs by way of universal succession. The court stated that neither the secrecy of telecommunications nor the post-mortem personal right to privacy stands in the way of inheritance.

In 2025, the Higher Regional Court of Oldenburg ruled that the contractual user relationship, with its rights and obligations for social media accounts (in this case: Instagram), is transferred to the heirs by way of universal succession. The heir may continue to actively use the account.

In a testamentary disposition, orders should also be made regarding digital assets. It should be noted, in particular, that the heirs should also be given access to the digital assets – for example, by deposition of the corresponding passwords.

As the German civil law system does not acknowledge the concept of trusts in its own right, trusts are not an estate planning vehicle in Germany.

The private law foundation plays a prominent role in the German tax and estate planning regime. This is especially true for the family foundation, which is not its own legal form but rather a private benefit foundation focused on beneficiaries who are related to the founder of the foundation. In addition to the regular tax burden of a private benefit foundation, a back-up inheritance tax is levied on the estate of the family foundation every 30 years. The gift and inheritance tax rate is favourable since it is based on the relationship between the settlor and the beneficiaries. Whether the back-up inheritance tax and the privilege of the tax rate violate European law is currently unclear. The German tax authorities hold that the privilege of the tax rate only applies to foundations established in Germany, as only these foundations are liable to the back-up inheritance tax. The provisions are not applicable to foreign foundations. In his statement to the European Court of Justice in 2025, the Advocate General expressed the opinion that such an application of the provisions does not violate the free movement of capital.

Another important structure for tax and estate planning is the limited partnership.

As stated in 3.1 Types of Trusts, Foundations or Similar Entities, trusts are not an estate planning vehicle in Germany, as the German civil law system does not acknowledge the concept of a trust in its own right.

Treatment of Trusts

Germany is not a member of the Hague Trust Convention and thus has not ratified the provisions thereof. The German treatment of trusts is typically determined by analogising the trust in question to some other legal arrangement recognised under German law. The analogising procedure involves searching for “similar” or comparable legal structures that can be used for estate planning purposes in the German jurisdiction instead of a trust. The analogising procedure is mainly influenced by the specific trust structure.

Testamentary trusts

If German succession law applies to the decedent’s estate, it is not possible to establish a trust mortis causa nor to bequeath parts of the estate to an existing trust. In such a case, especially when the testator has established a last will under foreign laws together with a testamentary trust, the trust arrangement will be regarded as German executorship, and the trustee will be regarded as executor and not as heir/legatee. The trust beneficiaries will be treated as heirs/legatees.

Inter vivos trusts

Two different views are taken in Germany with respect to inter vivos trusts. According to one view, they are legal institutions similar to a contract for debt, in which case, the principles of the international law of contracts for debt pursuant to the EU Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) analogously apply to the contractual obligation. Thereby, an inter vivos trust could also be created by German nationals serving as settlors.

Another more restrictive view considers the trust to be a legal institution under corporate law, in which case the link will be the same as under international corporate law.

As the trustee’s function in a trust is solely of a fiduciary nature with no own interest in the estate and the income of the trust, the mere appointment of a German citizen to serve as a trustee will, as a rule, have no tax consequences.

Place of business management in Germany

However, if the trustee conducts business in Germany, the place of business management (see Section 10 of the German Fiscal Code) might be in Germany. Consequently, the trust itself will be considered a corporation with unlimited tax liability according to Section 1(1) No 5 of the CITA; as a result, all worldwide income gained by the trust will be subject to German corporation tax. Similarly, unlimited tax liability will be established regarding gift and inheritance tax according to Section 2(1) No 1 lit d) of the IGTA. Ultimately, if the place of business management is established outside Germany again, a taxable disjunction of trust assets can be triggered.

For tax purposes, whether the concrete trust is a fiduciary arrangement or a separate legal entity must be determined. The tax implications for beneficiaries are the following.

Trust as a separate legal entity

The creation of a testamentary trust triggers inheritance tax. As manager of the trust assets, the trustee is obliged to file an inheritance notification with the German tax authorities. In the creation of an inter vivos trust, the settlor and the trustee are obliged to file a gift notification.

In the case of distributions from the trust to the settlor and/or the beneficiaries, the persons concerned have to file income tax returns and gift tax returns. The trustee as asset manager is also obliged to do this.

If the trust fulfils the prerequisites for the unlimited or limited corporate income tax liability pursuant to Section 1(1) or Section 2(1) of the CITA, the trustee is obliged to file a notification pursuant to Section 137 of the German Tax Procedure Act after trust creation, and has to file corporate income tax returns annually.

In 2023, the German tax authorities amended their decree on the application of the FTA in also addressing the income taxation of trusts. If the trust assets can be attributed to the persons behind the trust pursuant to general tax principles, the trust qualifies as transparent. The qualification is determined by assessing how the agreements are structured and how they are implemented in each individual case. If, according to the underlying agreements, the settlor can dissolve the trust at their free will so the assets can be distributed to the settlor, a transparent fiduciary agreement for German tax purposes can usually be assumed. Incidentally, ancillary agreements such as letters of wishes can also be included in the assessment.

In 2024, the Schleswig-Holstein Fiscal Court decided if an opaque trust is subject to German inheritance tax following the death of the German resident settlor – if an Anglo-American trust has been validly established in accordance with the applicable law (in this case, Guernsey law) and the settlor has not reserved any powers of control which would allow them to continue to dispose freely of the assets held in the trust, the assets held in the trust are to be regarded as legally independent (an opaque trust) and do not form part of the settlor’s estate on the death of the settlor. Hence, the trust assets are not subject to German inheritance tax.

Family Trusts Within the Meaning of Section 15 of the FTA (Special Tax Regime for Undistributed Income)

Scope of application

Section 15 of the FTA contains a special income tax regime for foreign so-called family foundations that are not subject to taxation of worldwide income and thus could be utilised to shelter income from taxation.

Foreign family foundation and trusts

A foreign family foundation is defined as an entity that has neither a registered office nor a place of effective management in Germany, and that was created to benefit the members of a family. The latter requirement is fulfilled if more than half of the foundation’s property and income is set aside for the founder and/or their relatives (Section 15(2) of the FTA). In Section 15(1) of the FTA, a proportionate share of the foundation’s income is included annually in the income of the settlor or of those beneficiaries and remaindermen who are German residents. Section 15(4) of the FTA extends this taxation mechanism to foreign “pools of assets” that were set up to benefit a family as required by Section 15(2) of the FTA. The German Federal Fiscal Court ruled in 1992 (Jersey trust) and 1994 (US trust) that trusts are such foreign “pools of assets”.

Exemption for EU/EEA trusts

Section 15(6) of the FTA excludes family foundations that have their registered office or place of effective management in EU/EEA member countries from the special taxation regime, provided that the trust’s property is extracted from the power of disposition of the settlor and their relatives, and that Germany and the respective state have entered into a certain exchange of information agreement.

Typically, the place of management of a trust is with the trustee. Nevertheless, when determining the place of management of a trust, one should also consider the rights and duties of a protector’s committee, if one exists.

In 2025, the Federal Fiscal Court ruled that the restriction in Section 15(6) of the FTA to foreign foundations that have their registered office or place of management in the EU/EEA violates the free movement of capital. Hence, the provision is generally applicable to all foreign family foundations and trusts if they fulfil the additional requirements of Section 15(6) of the FTA.

Tax consequences and taxation regime pursuant to Section 15 of the FTA

In accordance with the special taxation regime established by Section 15 of the FTA, which is applicable when the place of effective management of the trust is not located in Germany, property and (positive) income (negative income cannot be allocated to the settlor/beneficiary – see Section 15(7) sentence 2 of the FTA) of the family trust are attributed to the beneficiary on a pro rata basis if the beneficiary is a German resident. As long as the beneficiary is alive and the trust income accumulates to the trust, the trust income – as determined by German tax law – is added to the taxable income of the beneficiary on a pro rata basis. The beneficiary is entitled to a foreign tax credit with respect to foreign income taxes paid on the income by the trust. The trust income is included in the taxable income of the beneficiary in the taxable year in which the income arises, under general income tax rules on the level of the trust. Distributions of accumulated trust income that was subject to taxation in a prior year are not taxed a second time.

If the trust qualifies as a foreign family trust within the meaning of Section 15 of the FTA, and is not exempt under Section 15(6), its property and income are attributed to the beneficiary on a pro rata basis and added to their taxable German income.

According to Section 20(1) of the FTA, double tax treaties cannot prevent the allocation of income pursuant to Section 15(1) of the FTA. However, distributions of accumulated trust income that have been taxed under Section 15 of the FTA will not be taxed a second time when distributed to the German beneficiaries, according to Section 20(1) No 9 of the ITA.

Trust distributions of income or capital to German residents

The distribution of the income or capital of the trust to a German beneficiary may trigger income tax as well as gift tax.

German income taxation

Generally, distributions of foreign irrevocable trusts are subject to German income tax pursuant to Section 20(1) No 9 of the ITA. This is true for periodic or ad hoc distributions of trust income, and generally also for distributions of trust property (repayment of capital). However, repayments at the expense of the capital contribution account in terms of Section 27 of the CITA are not taxable. Moreover, the Muenster Fiscal Court ruled in 2023, that in the event of dissolution of a trust, distributions might be subject to income tax but a step-up to the 2010 tax basis has to be granted. In 2023, the Federal Fiscal Court ruled for foundations that they cannot establish a capital contribution account like a corporation. However, tax-free repayments of capital may be proven in a suitable manner.

Such distributions are taxed under the final flat-tax regime (withholding tax on capital gains) at a rate of 25% (plus solidarity surcharge and, if applicable, church tax) of the fair market value of the distributed assets. Under this law, not only income but also trust corpus is taxable income when distributed to a German beneficiary or remainderman.

A distribution from a foreign irrevocable trust to the German beneficiary or remainderman is not taxed under Section 20(1) No 9 of the ITA if the relevant income was already attributed to the German beneficiary under Section 15 of the FTA.

German gift tax

The distribution of trust property to remaindermen also constitutes a taxable gift under Section 7(1) No 9 of the IGTA if the remaindermen are residents of Germany. The Munich Fiscal Court ruled in 2024 that the classification of distributions from a US trust as gifts does not violate the free movement of capital.

Section 7(1) No 9 of the IGTA applies to distributions upon the dissolution of testamentary and inter vivos trusts. It also applies to distributions of property from a trust that continues to exist, although the statutory language may imply otherwise. The wording of Section 7(1) No 9 sentence 2 of the IGTA is as follows: “Transfers upon the dissolution of a foreign pool of assets, having the purpose of segregating property, as well as transfers to intermediate beneficiaries during the existence of the pool of assets... are deemed to be a taxable gift.”

The term “intermediate beneficiaries” is not legally defined. In 2019, the Federal Fiscal Court interpreted the concept of the intermediate beneficiary to mean that an intermediate beneficiary is any person who, irrespective of a specific resolution on a distribution, is legally entitled to the assets tied up in the trust or foundation and/or the income generated by the entity, whether – according to German legal concepts – in the form of rights in rem or in the form of claims under the law of obligations. This means that not all recipients can be regarded as intermediate beneficiaries, but only those who are legally entitled to the grant, such as in a strict trust situation. This must apply to a trust in the same way it applies to a foreign family foundation.

Consequently, only those grants pursuant to Section 7(1) No 9 of the IGTA can be taxed when they are received by a beneficiary who has a legal claim to these grants from the outset. It is clear that the gift tax then arises on the actual receipt of trust income or trust property by the recipient of a discretionary trust. In Section 15(2) sentence 2 of the IGTA, family relationships are taken into account when determining the applicable tax rate. Depending on their proximity to the decedent or settlor, beneficiaries and remaindermen can qualify for Class I or Class III of the gift tax-rate system. However, the determination of the tax rate class can pose difficulties if the trust property was contributed by different persons.

The Federal Fiscal Court has also ruled that distributions from a foreign foundation are only taxable as gifts under Section 7(1) No 1 of the IGTA if they clearly violate the purpose of the statutes. This is because a gratuitous transfer within the meaning of Section 7 of the IGTA can only be assumed if the distribution clearly exceeds the statutory purpose of the foreign foundation. Regarding the question of whether a distribution pursues the purpose of the articles of incorporation, there is a foundation-internal assessment prerogative, which restricts an examination by the tax office and/or the tax court accordingly.

The Federal Fiscal Court issued three more rulings in 2021 regarding the taxation of trusts. A trust is transparent for German tax purposes if the settlor still has power over the assets of the trust. In this case, the settlor is seen as the direct owner of the trust assets, and hence, the establishment of the trust is not subject to gift tax. If the settlor does not have power over the trust assets, the trust is considered to be opaque. The distributions from a foreign opaque trust to a German resident are generally subject to income tax and may simultaneously be subject to gift tax.

Double Taxation

As highlighted above, trust distributions can trigger income tax as well as gift tax simultaneously. Pursuant to Section 35b of the ITA, inheritance tax can be credited against German income tax if triggered by inheritance but not by donation. However, German tax law does not provide for a credit of the income tax paid by the beneficiary on the gift tax, nor vice versa.

In 2023, the Muenster Fiscal Court ruled that, in the event of dissolution of the trust, the distributions might be subject to income tax as well as gift tax. However, a step-up for income tax purposes was granted.

Distributions From a Foreign Family Foundation

Distributions from a foreign family foundation may be subject to income tax if they are comparable to dividends. In the case of a Swiss family foundation, the Federal Fiscal Court has ruled that, the recipient of the distribution must be comparable to a shareholder. This is the case if they fulfil the requirements set out in the foundation’s statutes for receiving distributions, that is, if they belong to the group of beneficiaries and no consideration is to be paid in return. However, the recipient does not require any further asset or organisational rights under the foundation statutes.

Retaining a certain amount of control for a settlor of a private foundation is possible. Nevertheless, retaining too much control can lead to the settlement or foundation being treated as a sham or fiduciary structure, especially in trust cases or when foreign foundations are involved. This was also the topic of a 2021 Federal Fiscal Court decision on trusts.

The most popular methods for asset protection are prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, family foundations and partnership structures.

Marriage Agreement

With a marriage agreement, it is also possible to transfer assets from one spouse to the other without incurring taxes, removing the assets from the reach of creditors by doing so.

Family Foundations

Assets that are transferred to a family foundation have left the property sphere of the founder and are attributed to the foundation itself. In order for this effect to occur, it is a prerequisite that the founder has actually given up control over these assets, which is, in turn, assumed by the entities of the foundation. It is also advisable for the founder to have no means of influencing the entities of the foundation with regard to this property. Assets that are successfully transferred are exempt from being accessed by any creditors of the founder.

Partnerships

Partnerships are often used (depending on the types of assets) to transfer wealth to the next generation but at the same time retain a degree of control over the gifted assets.

See 2.6 Transfer of Assets: Vehicle and Planning Mechanisms and 1.2 Exemptions.

A partial interest will generally be valued at the current market value of the underlying assets. However, the Muenster Fiscal Court decided in 2022 that a valuation discount may be applicable to a co-ownership share in a real property, compared to full ownership. The valuation discount is subject to a well-founded appraisal. The Higher Regional Court Hamm ruled in 2023 that a substantial discount (30% to 50%) is applicable to a co-ownership share in a real property held by a community of heirs.

Probate arbitration and mediation are considered as an alternative to probate litigation in solving wealth disputes. An effective way to avoid long and costly probate disputes is to establish an arbitration clause in a last will. This clause is usually combined with a no-contest clause.

There is no special mechanism for compensation in wealth disputes.

The use of corporate fiduciaries is not prevalent in German law.

Piercing the veil of a trust or foundation is unusual. Nevertheless, if a trust or foundation is regarded as a mere fiduciary agreement, the veil can be pierced and income as well as capital of the trust will be attributed to the settlor or – in rarer cases – to the beneficiaries.

The prudent investor rule is applicable to a fiduciary and also to an investment adviser.

There are very few investment theories or standards in this field in Germany. The Tax Court Munich (decision of 25 April 2016 – 7 K 1252/14) held that non-profit corporations are largely free to choose their investments. They may choose any form of investment that is economically reasonable, applying an ex ante perspective.

In general, German citizenship can be awarded automatically by law or upon the request of an individual by administrative act.

By law, German citizenship will be passed to children by way of kinship if one of the parents of the child is a German citizen. Another way of obtaining German citizenship is by way of adoption by at least one German citizen.

With certain prerequisites, citizenship can be acquired by administrative act if a person has immigrated lawfully to Germany and has had their habitual abode in Germany for longer than eight years. The same applies if an individual is willing to abandon their former citizenship and has a spouse or a registered partner with German citizenship. Alternatively, citizenship can be acquired if the individual has custody of a child who has German citizenship.

Former German nationals who were deprived of their citizenship by arbitrary expatriations by the Nazi regime on political, racial and religious grounds between 1933 and 1945, and their descendants, may apply for naturalisation (without further requirements).

Tax Residency

German tax residency may be obtained by maintaining a dwelling in Germany or by staying in Germany, when the stay is not merely temporary (generally, a stay of six months without interruptions suffices).

Citizens of the EU will be treated favourably in obtaining German citizenship as a result of the unity principle promoted by the EU.

On the one hand, they will not need to acquire a residence permit, but will be able to acquire this automatically if an application is filed with the responsible authorities. On the other hand, citizens of the EU are not required to drop their previous citizenship when obtaining German citizenship, thus gaining dual citizenship. Otherwise, EU citizens are held to the same standards as citizens of other countries.

A last will can be designed to focus especially on the needs of disabled children. In these cases, parents tend to consider specific provisions that ensure full support of the disabled child by state subsidy after their death, while keeping the estate itself untouched with regard to the day-to-day support of the child. This objective is reached by pairing a preliminary/posterior heirship with an executorship.

Appointing a guardian, conservator or similar party requires a court proceeding and ongoing supervision by the court. The district court as family court has the function to appoint guardians for minors or for adults with disabilities. The guardian is under the supervision of the court and is especially obliged to file financial reports.

A reform that became effective on 1 January 2023 has strengthened the right to self-determination and the autonomy of people in need of support. Regarding the custodianship law, the reform highlights the care of the person and the rights of the ward. Moreover, stricter rules apply to the care of property of the ward: gratuitous transfers of interest in partnerships and corporations to minors are treated equally, which implies that even the transfer of shares in a corporation will generally require a family court approval. In addition, in health emergency situations, one spouse may represent the other spouse who is temporarily unable to manage their healthcare affairs due to unconsciousness or illness for a limited amount of time.

The social insurance system in Germany includes mandatory nursing care insurance, which provides coverage in the event of an individual becoming care-dependent. The coverage of this insurance is determined by the level of the individual’s dependency on care.

German courts are increasingly dealing with maintenance issues, where parents demand maintenance payments from their children.

To avoid court-supervised care of a parent in the case of mental incapacity or something similar, it is common to produce a lasting power of attorney. However, such a power of attorney can only be established if the principal is still fully capable of acting in their own right. In this context, problems may arise, particularly in the event of dementia. The power of attorney may be revoked at any time.

A living will is usually drawn up together with a power of attorney.

In German tax and civil law, children born out of wedlock and adopted children are treated in the same way as children born in a marriage.

Same-sex marriages have been recognised in Germany since 1 October 2017; previously, it was possible to enter into a so-called registered partnership. It is possible to have a partnership that was registered before this date retroactively converted into a marriage. In addition, German registered partners are treated equally to other spouses regarding taxation.

Due to the high reliefs under the German income, inheritance and gift tax regime, structuring non-profit organisations can be a good way to combine private clients’ charitable interests with favourable tax planning.

Tax Reliefs

In general, tax reliefs are available for organisations that have tax-privileged purposes – that is, purposes that are in the public interest (defined as advancing the material, spiritual or ethical well-being of society), benevolent or religious. The statutory list of purposes in the public interest found in Section 52 of the German Fiscal Code is broad and includes:

  • the advancement of science;
  • art;
  • caring for the young or elderly;
  • education;
  • conservation;
  • social care;
  • caring for victims of persecution;
  • promoting international understanding;
  • accident prevention;
  • animal welfare;
  • international development;
  • consumer protection;
  • promotion of equal rights; and
  • sport.

The local tax office has jurisdiction to decide whether a particular organisation has tax-privileged purposes. If so, the organisation is exempt from most taxes (except in so far as it carries out a commercial activity not directly related to its tax-privileged purposes).

Tax Reliefs for Donors

Individuals can claim a tax deduction of up to 20% of their income in respect of gifts to tax-privileged organisations. In addition, an individual can deduct up to EUR1 million in any ten-year period in respect of contributions to the endowment of a tax-privileged foundation – that is, gifts of capital in respect of which the foundation may only distribute the income. A gift for tax-privileged purposes is free of inheritance tax.

This also applies to gifts to charities in EU and EEA member states for income and corporation tax purposes.

However, such gifts continue to be subject to gift tax unless a mutual recognition arrangement is in place, the applicable double-tax treaty provides otherwise or it is possible to structure the donation as a restricted gift, the use of which for exclusively charitable purposes is secured.

Structuring charitable organisations plays a significant role in German tax and estate planning. Charities can be set up in a variety of legal forms, including as foundations, corporations and associations.

Flick Gocke Schaumburg

Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49
MesseTurm
D-60308
Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 6971 7030

+49 697 170 3100

christian.von-oertzen@fgs.de www.fgs.de
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



Flick Gocke Schaumburg has seven offices in Germany – in Bonn, Frankfurt am Main, Hamburg, Berlin, Munich, Stuttgart and Düsseldorf. With more than 50 years’ experience in the field, the firm combines outstanding expertise in German and international tax law with specialist know-how in other relevant areas of business law. Flick Gocke Schaumburg advises on national and international mergers and acquisitions, disposals, venture capital and private equity transactions, and complex restructurings; it also provides comprehensive advice to high net worth individuals, family-owned businesses, foundations and non-profit organisations on all tax and legal issues related to wealth management and succession. The firm’s client roster is currently in excess of 2,000, including the majority of DAX-listed companies. In terms of tax crime and white-collar matters, Flick Gocke Schaumburg covers the entire spectrum, from risk assessments to representation in criminal proceedings.

Reform of the Foundation Law

The creation of foundations, in particular charitable foundations, is common among wealthy individuals in Germany, partly due to the changes in the German gift and inheritance law in 2016. In some cases, these foundations are majority shareholders of enterprises with several thousand employees and thus dispose of considerable fortunes. More than 25,000 foundations exist in Germany. A bill aimed at modernising German foundation law was passed in 2021 after various amendments. The bill includes a further harmonisation on the federal level (each German state still has its own foundation law), the recognition of the consumption foundation, possibilities to change the statutes, a possible merger of several foundations into a new foundation, and more liberal asset management. The new foundation law has been in force since July 2023. Moreover, the foundation law of most German states has been amended as a result of the changes on the federal level.

Introduction of a Foundation Register in 2026

To date, there is no foundation register in Germany in which all foundations are listed. A foundation register will be established on 1 January 2026. All foundations must be entered in this register. Existing foundations have until 31 December 2026 to register. The following data will be published in this register:

  • basic data of the foundation (name, registered office, date of recognition, period for which the foundation was established, if applicable);
  • information on the members of the foundation board and their power of representation;
  • information on the statutory restrictions on the power of representation of the foundation board; and
  • details of the special representatives and their power of representation.

Back-Up Inheritance Tax for German Foundations

Private law foundations play a prominent role in the German tax and estate planning regime. This is especially true for family foundations, which are not an own legal form but rather a private benefit foundation focused on beneficiaries who are related to the foundation’s founder. In addition to the regular tax burden of a private benefit foundation (gift tax and, potentially, capital gains tax and real estate transfer tax), a back-up inheritance tax is levied on the estate of the family foundation every 30 years. The gift and inheritance tax rate is favourable, since it is based on the relationship between the settlor and the beneficiaries.

Whether the back-up inheritance tax and the privilege of the tax rate violate European law is currently unclear. The German tax authorities hold that the privilege of the tax rate only applies to foundations established in Germany, as only these foundations are liable for the back-up inheritance tax. The provisions are not applicable to foreign foundations. In his statement to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in 2025, the Advocate General expressed the opinion that such an application of the provisions does not violate the free movement of capital.

Gratuitous Transfer of Real Estate: Valuation Changes

In case of gratuitous transfers, three valuation methods are generally applicable depending on the type of real estate:

  • the sales comparison method (taking into consideration the recent sale of comparable properties in the area);
  • the income capitalisation method (on the basis of the rental income earned from the building); and
  • the cost method (adding the value of the land and the costs of the building).

In the past, the valuations regularly led to a lower value than the fair market value of the real property. However, the Annual Tax Act 2022 provided changes resulting in higher valuations and thus possibly increasing gift and inheritance tax on German real estate. In contrast to this development, the Muenster Fiscal Court decided in a recent ruling that a valuation discount may be applicable to a co-ownership share in a real property, compared to full ownership. The valuation discount is subject to a well-founded appraisal. Moreover, the Higher Regional Court Hamm ruled in 2023 that a substantial discount (30% to 50%) is applicable to a co-ownership share in a real property held by a community of heirs.

Reform of the German Partnership Law

Case law and legal scholars have been amending the existing law on partnerships for decades. A bill passed in June 2021 was mainly aimed at codifying these developments. Moreover, civil-law partnerships can apply to be entered in a partnership register. Some civil-law partnerships do not have to be registered in this partnership register, which leads to even more transparency obligations. Partnerships holding real estate or interests in companies have to be registered. In addition, German company law applies to all partnerships registered in Germany, regardless of the place of their main activity. This allows German partnerships to move their main activity abroad. The new law on partnerships came into force on 1 January 2024.

Recent Amendments to the Law on Exit Taxation

Germany has revised its exit tax regime on the basis of the European Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive. The unlimited tax deferral in the case of exit tax for EU/EEA citizens within the EU/EEA area has been abolished. Moreover, the required period of unlimited tax liability for the application of exit taxation has been reduced from ten years to seven years. In contrast to former legislation, this calculation will not be based on the entire lifetime, but only on the last 12 years prior to exit. The exit tax lapses with retroactive effect upon re-establishment of German unlimited tax liability for a maximum period of 12 years (“temporary absence”). A limited tax deferral is possible in this case. The current exit tax regime has been applicable since 1 January 2022. Since the amendment, payment can be made in seven interest-free instalments.

Exit Taxation Under the Investment Tax Act

In 2024, Germany also introduced an exit tax on interest and shares in investment funds where the historic acquisition costs per fund unit/share class exceed the amount of EUR500,000. The above rules on the suspension of payment of exit taxes also apply to the exit tax in shares of investment funds. These new provisions in the German Investment Tax Act have been applicable to cases since 31 December 2024.

Exit Taxation Relocation to Switzerland

The Federal Fiscal Court ruled in 2023 on a 2011 relocation case to Switzerland, which applied the previous legislation that did not provide a permanent, interest-free tax deferral for relocations to non EU/EEA countries. The 2023 ruling was that such a tax deferral is applicable. Hence, it might be expected that the Federal Fiscal Court will rule in favour of a permanent, interest-free tax deferral in current EU/EEA cases, even though the present legislation does not provide such a tax deferral. However, no adaption of the exit tax is in sight, and the German tax authorities issued a decree in 2025 that the ruling will only be applied to relocation cases to Switzerland prior to 2022.

Tax Authorities on Exit Taxation

Moreover, the German tax authorities recently published decrees in 2023 and 2025 on the application of the exit tax. In the case of a temporary absence, the exit tax only lapses with retroactive effect if Germany’s right of taxation is directly re-established exactly it was at the time of departure. Particularly in cases with double taxation conventions, it must be ensured that the double taxation convention (re)assigns the right of taxation to Germany directly upon re-establishment of German unlimited tax liability.

Share distributions made after 16 August 2023 by corporations whose shareholders are subject to exit tax trigger immediate exit taxation if the share distributions exceed one quarter of the fair market value of the corporation.

Distributions From a Foreign Family Foundation

Distributions from a foreign family foundation may be subject to income tax if they are comparable to dividends. In the case of a Swiss family foundation, the Federal Fiscal Court ruled in 2024 that the recipient of the distribution must be comparable to a shareholder. This is the case if they fulfil the requirements set out in the foundation’s statutes for receiving distributions, that is, if they belong to the group of beneficiaries and no consideration is to be paid in return. However, the recipient does not require any further asset or organisational rights under the foundation statutes.

Taxation of Trusts in Germany

Germany has always struggled with common law trusts. German civil law does not recognise trusts, since Germany is not a member of the Hague Trust Convention and has not ratified the provisions of the agreement. German gift and inheritance tax law as well as income tax law, however, does recognise trusts, even though they are described as a “pool of assets, governed by foreign laws and aiming for the binding of assets”. The taxation of trusts is rather severe in Germany, especially in the case of distributions from the trust to beneficiaries in Germany.

Qualification of Trusts

The Federal Fiscal Court issued three decisions in 2021 regarding the taxation of trusts. A trust is transparent for German tax purposes if the settlor still has power over the assets of the trust. In this case, the settlor is seen as the direct owner of the trust assets and hence the establishment of the trust is not subject to gift tax. Where the settlor does not have power over the trust assets, the trust is considered to be opaque. In 2023, the German tax authorities published a new decree on the application of the Foreign Tax Act. Among other things, the decree addresses the income taxation of trusts: – if the trust assets can be attributed to the persons behind the trust pursuant to general tax principles, the trust qualifies as transparent. The assessment is determined by how the agreements are structured and how they are implemented in each individual case. If, according to the underlying agreements, the settlor can dissolve the trust at their free will and distribute the assets to the settlor, a transparent fiduciary agreement for German tax purposes can usually be assumed. Incidentally, ancillary agreements such as letters of wishes can also be included in the assessment.

Double Taxation of Trust Distributions

The distributions from a foreign opaque trust to a German resident are generally subjected to income tax and may simultaneously be subject to gift tax. Income of an opaque trust, that is not distributed to the beneficiaries, may also be attributed to German resident beneficiaries for income tax purposes.

The Muenster Fiscal Court ruled in 2023, that in the event of dissolution of the trust, the distributions might be subject to income tax as well as gift tax. However, a step-up for income tax purposes was granted.

Gift Tax

Generally no gift tax on distributions to beneficiaries or remaindermen in Germany

The Federal Fiscal Court stated in July 2019 that during the existence of a foreign foundation (and thus also of a trust), any distribution of principal or income to a beneficiary or remainderman in Germany who does not have a legal claim to the assets, is not subject to German gift tax. The Bavarian tax authority has confirmed the opinion expressed by the Federal Fiscal Court in a letter dated 5 March 2020.

Exceptional gift tax on distributions from a trust

The Munich Fiscal Court ruled in 2024 that the classification of distributions from a US trust as gifts does not violate the free movement of capital. Distributions by a German foundation to a beneficiary resident in Germany are not subject to gift tax. Meanwhile, distributions by a foreign foundation to a beneficiary resident in Germany are covered by the German gift tax. However, this distinction is justified by the fact that the German foundation has to pay back-up inheritance tax. The court was of the opinion that the coherence of the German tax system could act as justification.

Separation of Estate and Trust Assets

In 2024, the Schleswig-Holstein Fiscal Court decided if an opaque trust is subject to German inheritance tax following the death of the settlor, the following applies. If an Anglo-American trust has been validly established in accordance with the applicable law (in this case, Guernsey law) and the settlor has not reserved any powers of control which would allow them to continue to dispose freely of the assets held in the trust, the assets held in the trust are to be regarded as legally independent (opaque trust) and do not form part of the settlor’s estate on their death. Hence, the trust assets are not subject to German inheritance tax.

CFC Rules Partly Violate European Law

The assets and income of a foreign family foundation are attributed to the founder, if they are subject to German unlimited tax liability, or otherwise, to German resident beneficiaries or remaindermen. If a family foundation has its place of management or its registered office in EU/EEA countries and if there are sufficient exchanges of information between the foreign country and Germany, this provision is not applicable under certain conditions. In 2025, the Federal Fiscal Court ruled that this restriction to family foundations in EU/EEA countries violates the free movement of capital. Thus, the provision is applicable to all foreign family foundations if it is proved that the foundation assets are legally and actually withdrawn from the power of disposal of the settlor, beneficiary and remainderman. The separation must be considered on a legal and not on an economic basis. However, the German tax authorities still use an economic approach. In a press release, the Federal Fiscal Court extended the application of its decision to trusts. In the same ruling, the Federal Fiscal Court stated that the qualification as a remainderman does not require an enforceable claim, but merely a secured legal position with regard to the accrual of the assets.

Taxation of Crypto-Assets

In 2025, the German tax authorities released their latest guidelines regarding the taxation of crypto-assets, updating the guidelines published in 2022. These guidelines define common terms such as mining, tokens, wallets or staking. According to the tax authorities, each transaction involving a crypto-asset of any kind may qualify as a taxable event, even if the transaction does not involve an exchange into fiat money. The Nuremberg Fiscal Court ruled in 2025 that the taxation of these transactions without an exchange into fiat money is not unconstitutional. The mere trading of crypto-assets (even in great volume) does not qualify as a commercial activity from a German tax perspective, if this activity is conducted in the usual manner of private investors. If crypto-assets are privately held, they can be sold income tax-free after a holding period of more than one year. This is not the case for crypto-assets which qualify as commercial assets. Where the sale of the crypto-assets is subject to German income tax, the gain is calculated either on the basis of the first-in-first-out method or the average method at the taxpayer’s discretion. Special activities, like forging or mining crypto-assets, are always considered as commercial activities.

Taxation of Foreign Currency Exchange Gains

Investing into foreign currencies can be reasonable from an economical point of view. According to a 2022 decree of the German tax authorities, gains from foreign currency exchanges are taxed at the personal tax rate or at the 25% flat tax for capital gains depending on circumstances, such as whether the foreign currency account is interest bearing. Gains may even be tax free after a holding period of more than one year.

German Limited Inheritance Tax Liability in the Case of a Real Estate Legacy

In 2022, the Federal Fiscal Court ruled that German real estate was not subject to limited inheritance tax liability if the real estate was transferred by bequest. Generally, German real estate is taxable in the case of limited inheritance tax liability, especially if the beneficiary is appointed as an heir. However, if the beneficiary is “only” a legatee (according to the applicable law of succession, a legatee only acquires a claim against the heir to transfer the real estate), this claim was not subject to limited inheritance tax liability. This principle also applied if the real estate was later transferred to the legatee in order to fulfil the claim. The German legislator then amended the Inheritance and Gift Tax Act to put domestic and foreign legatees on equal footing.

Application of the German Forced Heirship Law Despite Choice of English Law of Succession

The German Federal Court ruled in 2022 that the German forced heirship law is applicable even if the testator, an English national, has chosen English law to govern their succession. The last habitual residence of the testator was in Germany and hence German law of succession was generally applicable. According to the German Federal Court, the choice of English law was (partially) in violation of the German ordre public since English law of succession does not provide any kind of forced heirship rights. Therefore, the choice of English law was (partially) invalid and consequently, German forced heirship law was applied.

Deductions of Liabilities in the Case of Limited Inheritance Tax Liability

Generally, estate liabilities are deducted from the taxable acquisition. In the case of limited tax liability, debts and encumbrances were not deductible in so far as they are not economically related to assets that are subject to limited tax liability. Hence, the German Federal Fiscal Court ruled that claims arising from the compulsory portions were not deductible in the case of limited inheritance tax liability. In 2021, the CJEU ruled that this provision violates the free movement of capital. In 2024, the German legislator amended the provision. A pro rata deduction is now possible.

Tax Relief of 10% for Residential Properties in Non-EU/EEA Countries

In principle, a 10% tax relief for gifts and inheritances was available for personally held real estate that was let for residential purposes and that was located in Germany, the EU or the EEA. In 2023, the CJEU ruled that this provision violated the free movement of capital because properties in countries other than the EU/EEA were excluded from this relief. Therefore, since 31 December 2024, the relief has also been applied to properties in non-EU/EEA countries that exchange inheritance and gift tax information with Germany.

Double Taxation Convention Sweden

The double taxation convention with Sweden came into effect in 1992. However, Sweden abolished its estate and gift tax in 2005. In 2023, the German Federal Fiscal Court ruled that a donor or decedent could not be a resident of Sweden within the meaning of the Double Taxation Convention because the country of residence was determined by unlimited tax liability. Therefore, the convention did not offer protection even if the donor had their centre of life in Sweden and the donee was only resident in Sweden for tax purposes. The donor’s residence in Germany was sufficient to establish German unlimited tax liability with no treaty protection. Consequently, the provisions on estate and gift tax were removed from the convention in October 2024.

Extended Unlimited Inheritance and Gift Tax Liability Does Not Violate the Constitution or European Law

The extended unlimited inheritance and gift tax liability applies if the deceased/donor or the heir/legatee/donee is a German citizen who left Germany for not more than five years (ten years in the case of Germany–USA). In 2022, the Federal Fiscal Court ruled that the extended unlimited inheritance and gift tax liability does not violate the principle of equality, the freedom to leave the country or the free movement of capital because the nationality of the parties involved establishes a sufficient link to Germany for tax purposes.

Inheritability of Social Media Accounts

The digital estate is an interplay of inheritance law, fundamental rights, privacy and business practices of service providers. In Germany, there are only a few judicial verdicts in relation to digital estates, so many legal issues are still unclear and somewhat controversial. In 2018, the German Supreme Court decided that the heirs are entitled to access the Facebook account of the deceased. The account would also be transferred to the heirs by way of universal succession. The court stated that neither the secrecy of telecommunications nor the post-mortem personal right to privacy stands in the way of inheritance. In 2025, the Higher Regional Court of Oldenburg ruled that the contractual user relationship, with its rights and obligations in relation to social media accounts (in this case, Instagram), is transferred to the heirs by way of universal succession. The heirs may continue to actively use the account.

Stability of Tax Laws

The German transfer tax regime is currently in a rather stable phase. Germany elected a new federal parliament (Bundestag) in 2025, with a government led by the Christian Democratic Union. So far, no major changes in transfer taxes have been announced. Like many other countries, Germany is still facing the consequences of the war in Ukraine; hence, changes might be expected.

Moreover, it remains unclear if the gift and inheritance tax exemptions for business assets are constitutional. It can therefore be expected that within the next two years, the German Federal Constitutional Court will render a decision in this regard.

Flick Gocke Schaumburg

Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49
MesseTurm
D-60308
Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 69 717 030

+49 697 170 300

christian.von-oertzen@fgs.de www.fgs.de
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Flick Gocke Schaumburg has seven offices in Germany – in Bonn, Frankfurt am Main, Hamburg, Berlin, Munich, Stuttgart and Düsseldorf. With more than 50 years’ experience in the field, the firm combines outstanding expertise in German and international tax law with specialist know-how in other relevant areas of business law. Flick Gocke Schaumburg advises on national and international mergers and acquisitions, disposals, venture capital and private equity transactions, and complex restructurings; it also provides comprehensive advice to high net worth individuals, family-owned businesses, foundations and non-profit organisations on all tax and legal issues related to wealth management and succession. The firm’s client roster is currently in excess of 2,000, including the majority of DAX-listed companies. In terms of tax crime and white-collar matters, Flick Gocke Schaumburg covers the entire spectrum, from risk assessments to representation in criminal proceedings.

Trends and Developments

Authors



Flick Gocke Schaumburg has seven offices in Germany – in Bonn, Frankfurt am Main, Hamburg, Berlin, Munich, Stuttgart and Düsseldorf. With more than 50 years’ experience in the field, the firm combines outstanding expertise in German and international tax law with specialist know-how in other relevant areas of business law. Flick Gocke Schaumburg advises on national and international mergers and acquisitions, disposals, venture capital and private equity transactions, and complex restructurings; it also provides comprehensive advice to high net worth individuals, family-owned businesses, foundations and non-profit organisations on all tax and legal issues related to wealth management and succession. The firm’s client roster is currently in excess of 2,000, including the majority of DAX-listed companies. In terms of tax crime and white-collar matters, Flick Gocke Schaumburg covers the entire spectrum, from risk assessments to representation in criminal proceedings.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.