In the past 12 months, the technology M&A market in Paraguay has shown moderate growth, aligned with post-pandemic economic recovery. While the global pace of growth has been faster, increased activity in fintech and digital services transactions has been seen in Paraguay, driven by accelerated digitalisation and growing interest from foreign investors in the region. Locally, tech companies are seeking consolidation and attracting foreign capital, highlighting the crucial role of foreign investment in the market’s growth.
Before this publication, Paraguay recently reached investment grade status, a significant milestone that is expected to have a positive impact on the technology M&A market. Therefore, in the short and midterm, a considerable boost in foreign investment in general in anticipated, and given the rapid advance of technology, this niche will increase in prominence in the country, providing promising prospects for investors and tech companies alike.
Over the past year, there has been a notable increase in investments in technology, particularly in fintech and telemedicine, which are critical sectors for developing the digital ecosystem in Paraguay. Government incentives for the technology sector and the growth of tech start-ups have contributed to this trend. Additionally, international investors are increasingly interested in acquiring stakes in local tech companies.
Start-ups in Paraguay are usually registered locally to benefit from the low corporate income tax (CIT), with a 10% annual rate, and the simplified tax regime. The process of registering a company in Paraguay is quite efficient, typically taking only two to eight weeks depending on the type of entity used – simplified stock corporation (empresa por acciones simplificada; EAS), stock corporation (sociedad anónima; SA) or limited liability company (sociedad de responsabilidad limitada; SRL) – and whether the investor is present in the country or represented by a proxy when signing the deed. It is common for companies to acquire shelf companies, especially SAs, which can be incorporated and ready to operate within one to two weeks. The entire acquisition process can be completed electronically.
Except for certain fintech companies (eg, electronic wallets), there is no initial or minimum capital requirement in Paraguay. This flexibility, based on local practices, allows start-ups to enter the market easily, with the only recommendation being to have sufficient capital to carry out their activities.
Entrepreneurs are generally advised to incorporate as an SA or an EAS, depending on the size of the project and the level of liability founders are willing to accept.
The EAS is a new type of vehicle available from 2020. It is easier and faster to incorporate if the pro forma by-laws are used, as it is incorporated via a government system and is ready within a week or two. However, everything must be done under such a system. Another advantage of this kind of vehicle is that it is the only one that allows one shareholder. All other vehicles require at least two, even if the second shareholder has a minimum stake.
An SA requires a notary public and registration before the Public Records Division. Since this type of company has existed for decades, it is the most widely recommended vehicle for investors with various shareholders, and for those who plan a local IPO (EAS shares or bonds cannot be traded in the local stock market).
Seed investment for start-ups in Paraguay typically comes from individuals or companies who are the founders. If a start-up is deemed to have potential, local or foreign investors often acquire a majority stake in it. Meanwhile, the previous owners may continue as managers or consultants for a few years.
The process usually involves private investment agreements that outline the terms and conditions of the investment. Additionally, depending on the bank’s risk appetite, some local bank funding can be obtained. Recently, some digital – ie, less traditional – banks have been established, and this type of loan is becoming more common.
Venture capital in Paraguay is still in the early stages of development, with limited local funding sources and minimal government-sponsored support. However, there is a growing trend of foreign investors providing funding for promising start-ups. International venture capital firms, particularly those from neighbouring countries, have begun to express interest in Paraguay’s expanding tech sector.
While venture capital regulation and documentation guidance or statutes in Paraguay are almost non-existent and less standardised than in other jurisdictions, international best practices are often followed, especially for deals involving foreign investors.
As start-ups grow, they may be advised to change their corporate structure, move to another location to access better financing options or enter new markets. However, many tech start-ups remain in Paraguay due to favourable tax laws and government incentives. In this scenario, the parent company, particularly if it is a venture capital investor, plays a crucial role in seeking capital or a foreign IPO to fund the local entity.
Only a few Paraguayan companies issue bonds abroad, usually on the New York Stock Exchange, while maintaining their local legal structure.
In Paraguay, start-up investors are more inclined to pursue a sale process rather than an IPO due to the limited depth of the local stock exchange. Dual-track processes are uncommon in the local market, and an exit through a sale is generally the preferred option.
If a company decides to become publicly traded, it is more likely that it will pursue a listing on a foreign stock exchange. This is particularly true when the local stock market lacks the depth of other emerging or established regional and global markets. Foreign exchanges provide better access to capital and increased liquidity for shareholders.
The decision to list on a foreign exchange can significantly influence the feasibility of future M&A transactions. For instance, foreign exchanges often have stringent minority shareholder protection rules, including squeeze-out mechanisms that are not commonly available under Paraguayan law. This could pose a challenge in implementing a successful tender offer and squeezing out minority shareholders, especially if the company is not listed on the home country exchange.
Understanding the tax implications is crucial. For instance, if shares of a publicly listed company in the Paraguayan stock exchange are sold, the capital gain is entirely exempt. On the other hand, the sale of a non-listed share is subject to Paraguayan taxes.
In Paraguay, the sale of a company typically involves bilateral negotiations with a specific buyer rather than going through an auction process. The smaller market size often results in fewer competing buyers, making auctions less frequent, if not non-existent, in the past.
In Paraguay, the typical transaction structure for a privately held tech company involves selling a controlling interest. Current trends show that venture capital funds often choose to exit entirely, while founders may remain as shareholders. This structure allows investors to cash out while ensuring continuity in the management of the company.
In Paraguay, most transactions are conducted as cash sales for a liquidity event. However, stock-for-stock deals may occur when the buyer is a foreign company listed on an exchange. It is rare to have a combination of cash and stock, but this may happen, especially when valuation uncertainties need to be addressed.
In a liquidity event, founders and venture capital investors are usually required to support representations and warranties, such as tax liabilities, employee claims and environmental issues, after the deal is finalised. Escrow accounts or hold-backs are commonly used to cover these potential liabilities, but representations and warranties insurance is not yet widely used in this jurisdiction.
Spin-offs, while not particularly common in Paraguay due to its limited regulations, have been on the rise in recent years, particularly in the technology sector. This trend is driven by the need for efficient capital and the strategic separation of business units, which is attracting investment in specific technology segments.
In Paraguay, spin-offs can potentially be structured as tax-neutral transactions at the corporate level, subject to compliance with specific legal and tax requirements.
At the shareholder level, a spin-off presents an opportunity to significantly reduce the burden of a liquidity event. Selling shares of a new local entity could result in a maximum of 4.5% tax on the gross selling price, or even zero tax if the spin-off is strategically arranged with a foreign entity as the shareholder of the target company.
A spin-off may qualify as tax-neutral at the corporate level if executed at book value and in line with other relevant corporate restructuring provisions. If such conditions are met, the transfer of assets during the spin-off should not trigger immediate tax liabilities, such as the CIT or the withholding tax (WHT) on dividends (impuesto a los dividendos y utilidades; IDU).
It is important to note that as of the time of writing, there are no specific provisions in place regarding the continuity of ownership, business or purpose in relation to spin-offs in Paraguay.
Key requirements for achieving tax neutrality in a spin-off include:
Spin-offs followed immediately by a business combination are possible in Paraguay. The key requirements include ensuring compliance with tax regulations (keeping the assets at book value) and corporate law, as well as obtaining shareholder and board approvals. This is the most common way in which spin-offs are utilised.
The typical timeline for a spin-off in Paraguay depends on the transaction’s complexity, the shareholders’ agreement, the kind of assets involved and regulatory approval (for some industries), but it generally takes four to six months. A tax ruling from the Paraguayan tax authority is not required, but some opt for it. In such a case, obtaining it can take three to six months.
It is not customary in Paraguay to acquire a stake in a public company before making an offer. The reporting threshold for acquiring an interest in a public company is 10%.
Regarding the disclosure, unless it could be considered a “material event”, the company has three business days to inform the relevant authorities, namely, the Securities Superintendency (Superintendencia de Valores; SIV), equivalent to the American SEC, and the Asunción stock exchange (Bolsa de Valores de Asunción; BVA). Generally, the acquisition of shares by a third party should not be considered a material event. A merger, on the other hand, is considered a material event.
Further, the company must update its ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) and legal entities records. The UBO record contains information about the individuals who ultimately own or control the company, while the legal entities record includes details about the company’s structure and ownership.
On a regular basis – ie, every quarter – the company is mandated to file and publicly disclose its financial statements, including all holders with more than 10% of the shares or the votes. This regularity, a testament to the transparency of the Paraguayan market, ensures stakeholders are consistently informed.
The acquirer is not required to disclose its intentions regarding the company, and importantly, there is no “put up or shut up” rule, providing a level of flexibility in the Paraguayan market.
Paraguay does not have a mandatory offer threshold for acquiring a public company. The process for acquiring control is typically governed by the company’s by-laws and shareholder agreements, if any.
Public company acquisitions in Paraguay are typically structured as tender offers, and mergers are less commonly used for public companies due to the corporate process of local merger regulations. Tender offers allow for a cleaner and faster acquisition process and are often preferred.
Acquisitions of public companies in the technology industry typically involve cash transactions, although stock-for-stock deals may happen when a foreign buyer is involved.
There is no minimum price requirement for a takeover offer, but contingent value rights and other mechanisms are used to address valuation uncertainties.
Typical conditions for a takeover offer include the following:
Paraguayan regulators typically allow reasonable flexibility in applying conditions, and usually approve transactions if the origin of funds complies with all relevant mutual legal assistance (MLA) regulations and the conditions do not violate antitrust regulations.
All bonds or securities in the market must be cancelled before the company can withdraw from public offering.
In Paraguay, it is customary for parties to enter into a transaction agreement regarding a tender offer. The target company’s board is usually not involved, and negotiations take place at the shareholder level.
Additionally, sellers and the company typically provide detailed representations and warranties, especially when the acquisition involves all shares. The specific details of these representations are usually negotiated on a case-by-case basis.
A typical minimum acceptance condition for tender offers in Paraguay is 51%, reflecting the majority control threshold. However, higher thresholds may be negotiated in some cases, especially when control over strategic decisions is crucial to the acquirer.
Paraguayan law does not provide specific squeeze-out mechanisms, which are legal procedures that allow majority shareholders to force minority shareholders to sell their shares, following a successful tender offer.
However, in the following situations, shareholders can exercise their right to leave the company through withdrawal (derecho de receso). To exercise this right, the shareholder must notify the company within a specific period, generally through written communication, requesting reimbursement of the value of their shares. The company must buy back the shares at fair value, usually determined by the last balance sheet, ensuring a fair and just process for the shareholder.
The triggering situations to exercise such a right are:
Furthermore, it is important to note that corporate by-laws or shareholder agreements can include rules regarding squeeze-out mechanisms. This underlines the importance of being informed and prepared as a shareholder.
In Paraguay, it is not mandatory by law to have specific funds, such as fully executed financing documents, to initiate a takeover offer. Nevertheless, it is standard procedure for the acquiring party to have financing arranged, and the offer may be contingent upon securing the necessary financing.
Deal protection measures like break-up fees, matching rights and non-solicitation provisions are permitted in Paraguay, although they are not as prevalent as in other jurisdictions. These provisions are typically open to negotiation between the parties since there is no specific regulation governing them. Therefore, the parties have the freedom to negotiate and establish these measures as they see fit.
If a bidder cannot acquire 100% ownership of a target, they may negotiate governance rights such as board representation, veto rights on strategic decisions and profit-sharing agreements to protect their interests. Given the lack of regulation for these covenants, the parties have complete freedom for negotiation.
In Paraguay, it is common practice to secure irrevocable commitments from significant shareholders to tender their shares. These commitments, which usually include a guarantee or a high penalty clause, also typically allow shareholders to withdraw if a better offer arises, but only after paying a break-up fee or similar. This provision for better offers can be seen as an opportunity for shareholders, adding a sense of optimism to the market.
If a competing offer is announced, whether the initial offer will be terminated or further evaluated depends solely on the conditions accepted by the shareholders. There are no specific regulations governing this situation, and it is based entirely on the agreement of the parties involved. All bonds or securities in the market must be cancelled before the company can withdraw from public offering.
Takeover offers can be extended in Paraguay, provided the target company and the sellers agree. To avoid delays, it is recommended to seek regulatory approval before launching the offer, but in general, transactions tend to be communicated after the offer is made.
Establishing and running a new technology company in Paraguay is governed by general corporate regulations. However, there are no specific regulatory bodies exclusively dedicated to overseeing the tech sector.
Nonetheless, certain areas, such as telecommunications and fintech, relating to loan concessions and electronic wallets, are regulated by entities like the National Telecommunications Commission (Comisión Nacional de Telecomunicaciones; CONATEL) and the Central Bank of Paraguay (Banco Central del Paraguay; BCP).
Obtaining permits from these entities may take two to four months. Further, they might be subject to assessment by the finance intelligence unit (Secretaría de Prevención de Lavado de Dinero o Bienes; SEPRELAD).
The primary securities market regulator in Paraguay is the SIV, which depends on the BCP, and the Antitrust Commission (Comisión Nacional de la Competencia; CONACOM), which oversees M&A transactions involving public and private companies.
There are no significant restrictions on foreign investments in Paraguay. Foreign direct investment filings are not mandatory, and no suspensory requirements exist.
Paraguay does not have a formal national security review process for acquisitions, and there are no specific restrictions on investments from certain regions. However, there is a ban on nationals of the countries bordering Paraguay (Bolivia, Brazil and Argentina) acquiring land within a 50-km radius of the Paraguayan border.
In Paraguay, antitrust regulations are governed by Law No 4956/13 on the Promotion of Competition, and CONACOM is the authority responsible for overseeing these matters.
Filing Requirements
A filing with CONACOM is required for takeover offers or business combinations that meet the following threshold: the combined turnover of the parties involved must currently exceed around USD35,000,000, updated annually according to Paraguay’s minimum wage.
When the Filing Must Be Made
The filing must be submitted within ten days after the transaction is executed. Unlike other jurisdictions where filings are required before closing, Paraguayan law allows the transaction to be completed first, with the obligation to file for antitrust approval within this post-transaction window.
CONACOM’s Powers
CONACOM has extensive powers to review, approve, conditionally approve or block a transaction based on its potential impact on competition. During its review process, which typically lasts 60 to 120 days, CONACOM can:
It is crucial that parties comply fully with CONACOM’s requirements. Failure to file within the required period, or to comply with the imposed conditions, could result in penalties or even a reversal of the transaction.
In Paraguay, employers must comply with several fundamental labour law regulations:
There are no works councils, but labour unions are becoming increasingly rare.
There are no formal currency controls in Paraguay. M&A transactions involving a central bank-regulated entity may require central bank approval to ensure compliance with MLA regulations.
In the past three years, Paraguay has not experienced significant court rulings related to M&A in general, nor in the technology sector in particular.
Although there is no specific regulation addressing this topic, three laws could potentially strengthen or facilitate M&A in the technology sector.
Overall, while specific M&A regulations may be limited, these laws provide a supportive framework that could enhance activities in the technology sector.
No response has been provided in this jurisdiction.
In Paraguay, data privacy legislation is scarce and limited mostly to credit scoring data. Further, public companies can provide necessary due diligence information to potential bidders. However, the board of directors must ensure that the information disclosed is not prejudicial to the company’s interests and does not provide undue advantage to any bidder. The same level of information must be provided to all bidders, and financial statements, corporate governance details and operational information must be shared.
Due diligence often includes a review of technology infrastructure, intellectual property and data privacy policies, as well as compliance with local regulations.
Paraguay still lacks a comprehensive data privacy law; however, some general privacy principles are included in Law No 6534/20. Companies that handle sensitive or personal data must take appropriate measures to protect that information during the due diligence process. Disclosing personal data without the individuals’ consent can lead to legal challenges, particularly in sectors like fintech, where the handling of personal data is especially sensitive. Data privacy restrictions can limit the scope of due diligence for technology companies, particularly if the target holds a significant amount of personal data.
If the acquisition is considered a material event according to the regulations of the Paraguayan Stock Exchange, the company is required to disclose the bid to the SIV and the stock exchange within three business days.
A prospectus is typically required if shares are issued in a stock-for-stock takeover or business combination. The decision of where the buyer’s shares must be listed, either on the Paraguayan stock exchange or a recognised foreign exchange, is significant. However, it is important to note that Paraguayan regulation does not mandate listing.
Local regulation does not oblige bidders to disclose documents publicly. Publicly traded companies must provide financial statements, following International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) standards in Paraguay.
In Paraguay, parties must file copies of the primary transaction documents, such as the acquisition agreement and any relevant shareholder agreements, with the securities regulator if the transaction involves a public company. Private transactions may not require such public filings. In any case, should the transaction trigger any of the antitrust tests, it is imperative that they are filed with CONACOM. This is a key aspect of regulatory compliance that cannot be overlooked.
In Paraguay, the directors of a company involved in a business combination primarily owe their duties to the shareholders. However, they must also act in the best interests of the company as a whole, considering the potential effects on employees, creditors and other stakeholders. Directors are required to ensure that the transaction is fair and reasonable for all parties involved.
In Paraguay, it is uncommon for companies to form special or ad hoc committees during business combinations. However, when conflicts of interest arise, especially among directors, companies may establish committees to oversee negotiations and protect shareholder interests.
Typically, during the initial stage, the partners engage in negotiations. If shareholders approve, the board of directors may then become involved. In this scenario, the board may actively participate in negotiations throughout an M&A transaction. It is responsible for recommending or rejecting offers and may also defend the company against hostile bids if necessary. While shareholder litigation challenging the board’s decisions is uncommon in Paraguay, it can occur, especially if the board is perceived to be acting against the best interests of the shareholders.
It is standard practice for shareholders to seek independent financial and legal advice during a business combination. The board’s involvement is crucial, and they may also seek outside advice. While not mandatory, a fair opinion from a financial adviser is often obtained in significant transactions. Its purpose is to ensure the offer is fair to shareholders from a financial perspective.
Capitan Juan Dimas Motta 245 esquina Andrade
001408 Asunción
Paraguay
+595 981 547 839
mva@mv-a.com.py www.mv-a.com.py
Reorganisation Without Realisation: M&A Strategy and the Role of Tax Neutrality in Paraguay’s Corporate Framework
The mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market in Paraguay is entering a phase of expansion and increasing sophistication, driven by regional investment, business-to-business transactions and closer integration with the international financial environment.
Within this context, the principle of tax neutrality introduced by Law No 6380/2019 (the “Tax Law”) has become a strategic pillar for structuring efficient, predictable transactions aligned with international standards. Paraguay’s reorganisation regime – encompassing mergers, spin-offs and acquisitions – enables corporate transformations to be executed without triggering unnecessary taxation, provided that the legal and tax conditions set out by the statute are observed.
This article examines how Paraguay’s fiscal, corporate and governance frameworks have converged to form a modern and competitive environment for M&A, where continuity and integrity underpin a rapidly maturing transactional practice.
The evolving landscape of M&A in Paraguay
Paraguay’s economy is undergoing a process of formalisation, capitalisation and cross-border expansion, supported by a stable macroeconomic environment and a progressively consolidated legal framework. Investors from Brazil, Argentina, Chile and, increasingly, Europe and the United States view the country as an efficient and reliable gateway to the Southern Cone, offering a dynamic business base and competitive operating costs.
The local M&A market has diversified and grown more sophisticated. Technology-driven deals have expanded across fintech, software, logistics and agribusiness, while the financial sector is experiencing consolidation. Mergers between local banks are driven by the pursuit of scale, digital integration and capital optimisation, reducing the number of standalone entities.
Significant activity has also emerged in the automotive, entertainment and consumer sectors, reflecting a more professionalised market and growing investor appetite. These trends combine the maturity of local entrepreneurs with the arrival of foreign capital seeking efficient corporate structures and reduced currency exposure.
Many of these transactions involve complex reorganisations, necessitating an integrated legal, tax and financial approach that focuses on structural efficiency and investment sustainability.
In practice, most acquisitions in Paraguay are structured as share or equity transfers of going concerns. Target companies are typically organised as corporations (public limited companies; sociedades anónimas), offering operational flexibility, liquidity and legal certainty in share transfers. This structure supports both exits for local investors and entry opportunities for regional and international buyers, consolidating Paraguay’s reputation as a reliable corporate jurisdiction.
Deal structures commonly combine cash consideration with variable components (earn-outs) linked to financial performance or post-closing verification of representations and warranties. Payment deferrals typically range from 90 days to one year after closing, depending on the deal complexity and the nature of contractual guarantees.
Tax indemnity clauses in favour of buyers are common, particularly when targets have undergone recent reorganisations or hold tax credits that are subject to audit or review. Escrow or holdback mechanisms, often implemented through notarial deposits or trusts, are increasingly used to secure these obligations. Although unregulated, these tools have become standard in local practice.
Corporate mergers and spin-offs are gaining ground. Mergers, governed by the Civil Code and complemented by tax provisions, are typically used in group integrations or restructuring processes, where consideration is granted in the form of shares or participations in the resulting entity.
Spin-offs, though not expressly regulated under civil and commercial law, are recognised for tax purposes, ensuring continuity of fiscal values and neutrality. In practice, they are used to separate business lines, reorganise asset holdings, or prepare spin-offs before new investor entry or the sale of a business unit.
Conversely, direct acquisitions of assets or shares are subject to taxation. The sale of assets is subject to corporate income tax (impuesto a la renta empresarial; IRE) and VAT, while share sales, though VAT-exempt, may still generate income taxable under the IRE and, subsequently, dividend tax withholding (impuesto a los dividendos y a las utilidades; IDU) upon profit distribution.
If the seller party is a non-resident, the realised gain on the share assignment is taxable at a maximum effective rate of 4.5% non-resident income tax (impuesto a la renta de no residentes; INR), which must be paid by the local company whose shares were sold. The local company is jointly and severally liable with the non-resident seller for the payment of this tax.
The indirect sale of Paraguayan companies’ shares remains untaxed, as no anti-abuse rules have been enacted so date.
This distinction shapes transaction strategy: reorganisations prioritise neutrality and deferral, while direct sales favour liquidity and simplicity. In both cases, early co-ordination between legal, tax and financial teams is crucial to ensure that the transaction structure aligns with the economic intent of the parties and optimises regulatory and fiscal outcomes.
The fiscal framework for corporate reorganisations
The Tax Law reorganised Paraguay’s tax structure and introduced the IRE as the core levy applicable to business entities.
For legal, financial and M&A advisers, its scope extends beyond taxation, as it shapes how transactions are structured, timed and executed. Its guiding principle – that of “effective realisation” – determines when income is deemed to have been generated, ensuring that only transactions involving a genuine transfer of economic risks and benefits are subject to tax.
This principle creates a bridge between corporate reorganisation and fiscal neutrality. It enables companies involved in technological carve-outs, holding realignments or regional consolidations (such as cross-border mergers within the Southern Cone), to restructure without triggering taxation, provided that asset and fiscal continuity are maintained.
The tax authority – now the National Directorate of Tax Revenue (Direccion Nacional de Ingresos Tributarios; DNIT), formerly the Subsecretariat of State for Taxation – has reinforced this interpretation through binding rulings, such as the one issued in April 2023 on the tax treatment of corporate spin-offs. In that case, the DNIT concluded that reorganisations preserving patrimonial continuity do not entail the effective realisation of income, and therefore do not constitute a taxable event under the IRE, and that this neutrality extends to related taxes, such as VAT and IDU.
Elective neutrality and strategic planning
In Paraguay, tax neutrality is not automatic but elective, and therefore strategic.
When structuring a merger or spin-off, companies may choose between:
This elective model grants flexibility in designing reorganisations. Continuity ensures accounting and fiscal coherence, while realisation allows alignment of tax bases with economic reality, at an immediate fiscal cost.
Unlike other jurisdictions that condition neutrality on business purpose tests or shareholder continuity over a prescribed post-merger period, Paraguay focuses solely on whether fiscal continuity or realisation occurs at the transaction date. This simplicity allows practitioners to tailor structures to the economic intent of each deal, provided they adhere to good faith principles and are subject to post-transaction audit.
Ultimately, the choice between continuity and realisation has direct implications for asset valuation, risk allocation and deal pricing.
Formal compliance and fiscal risk
Paraguay’s reorganisation regime stands out for its conceptual clarity and operational simplicity, providing predictability and efficiency in practice. Neutrality applies only when the transaction takes a legally recognised form, merger, spin-off, absorption or transformation, duly registered under civil and commercial law.
Transfers of assets or liabilities outside this framework, such as intra-group transfers without formal reorganisation, are treated as taxable disposals subject to IRE, VAT and potentially IDU, and eventually INR if non-resident parties are involved. Asset or equity contributions, however, remain tax-neutral.
This design, centred on legal form and fiscal continuity, has proven effective for most local and intra-group transactions. Yet, its generality poses challenges for more complex deals involving purchase price allocation (PPA), intangible revaluation or regional consolidation. The absence of detailed guidance on accounting alignment or loss continuity requires careful planning and technical justification.
Nevertheless, Paraguay offers tangible advantages. Loss carry-forwards may be applied for up to five years and, in practice, can be utilised by successor entities in mergers or acquisitions, provided that patrimonial and accounting continuity are ensured – a pragmatic approach compared with restrictive regimes elsewhere.
In short, the Paraguayan system combines formal certainty with practical applicability, forming a solid base for modern corporate restructuring.
VAT, dividend tax and indirect effects
In Paraguay, fiscal neutrality in reorganisations extends beyond income tax to include indirect taxation and compliance. Mergers, spin-offs, absorptions and transformations are treated as internal asset transfers rather than commercial transactions, and thus remain outside the scope of VAT and IDU, provided no actual profit distribution occurs.
Conversely, transactions structured outside these legal forms, for example, direct asset or business sales, are fully taxable, potentially triggering VAT, IRE and subsequent IDU upon the distribution of profits.
The tax authority has reaffirmed this approach. In the 2023 binding ruling on corporate spin-offs, the DNIT confirmed that such reorganisations are exempt from VAT and do not trigger IDU unless an actual gain is realised. Similarly, in 2025, the DNIT extended this principle to electronic compliance, confirming that the absorbing entity in a merger may issue debit or credit notes on behalf of the absorbed entity under the electronic invoicing system (sistema de facturación electrónica; SIFEN), ensuring accounting and fiscal traceability.
This reflects a coherent and pragmatic application of neutrality across both fiscal and documentary dimensions. In practice, it requires careful co-ordination of balance approval, transaction timing and profit distribution to avoid unintended taxable events, alongside administrative duties such as updating invoice locations and cancelling registries.
Documentary cycle
In M&A transactions, documentation plays a central role, not merely as evidentiary support but as the core mechanism for allocating risk, ensuring traceability and achieving regulatory compliance.
The process usually begins with the preparatory and engagement stage, where non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) are executed to protect confidential information shared during initial discussions. These are followed by sale or purchase mandates, which define the scope of representation for advisers and financiers, and by letters of intent or term sheets, which outline the commercial parameters and negotiation roadmap.
Once a preliminary consensus is reached, the parties may issue binding or non-binding offers (BOs/NBOs) or formalise a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to consolidate commitments prior to conducting due diligence and drafting definitive contracts.
In cases of mergers or spin-offs, the documentary dimension broadens. The process requires formal approval by the shareholders’ meeting, execution of definitive reorganisation agreements, including special balance sheets, and compliance with civil and administrative publicity requirements, including registration and publication notices. These instruments legally formalise the universal transfer of assets, liabilities and legal relationships, ensuring enforceability against third parties and the continuity of rights and obligations.
At the core of acquisition transactions lies the share purchase agreement (SPA), which governs the transfer of control, the purchase price, adjustment mechanisms, representations, warranties and indemnities. In parallel, shareholders’ agreements (SHAs) or syndication agreements define post-transaction governance, exit provisions and strategic co-ordination between new partners.
In leveraged transactions, these are complemented by financing agreements or credit facilities, together with ancillary commercial contracts, such as supply, management, licensing or transition service agreements, designed to ensure operational continuity.
Ultimately, the success of any transaction depends as much on the technical precision of its documentation as on its coherence with the economic, fiscal and regulatory objectives of the parties. Early and co-ordinated engagement of legal, tax and financial teams is therefore essential to ensure that the chosen structure – whether acquisition, merger or spin-off – accurately reflects the commercial intent and preserves both fiscal efficiency and sound corporate governance.
Governance, substance and compliance
Beyond tax considerations, corporate reorganisations in Paraguay promote transparency, traceability and sound governance, more through practice than through regulation. Proper implementation not only ensures fiscal neutrality but also enhances institutional confidence and market credibility before investors and regulators.
Although the country lacks a detailed framework on economic substance, corporate governance or post-merger continuity, market practice has evolved to adopt international compliance standards inspired by leading M&A jurisdictions. This spontaneous evolution has fostered a progressively sophisticated environment, even in the absence of prescriptive rules.
It is worth noting that tax filings in Paraguay are strictly standalone; only entities under special supervision consolidate financial statements for regulatory purposes, not for tax purposes. This structure creates technical challenges in aligning accounting and tax records for multinational groups, where parent companies must reconcile Paraguayan figures with consolidated reports, often requiring adjustments from consolidated to taxable results.
The absence of international transparency or controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules provides flexibility, but it also calls for prudence in regional structures that span multiple jurisdictions.
In sectors driven by intangible assets, such as technology, data and digital services, the proper valuation and transfer of software, licences and intellectual property are crucial to ensure compliance and avoid operational or regulatory disruption.
For investment funds, strategic buyers and multinational groups, traceability during reorganisations is a decisive factor for post-closing integration. It enables a smooth transition of risks and obligations, supports regional accounting consistency and strengthens Paraguayan companies’ capacity to integrate into international groups meeting OECD-level governance standards.
Ultimately, reorganisations in Paraguay rely more on professional maturity than on prescriptive norms. Their effective execution requires legal alignment and operational consistency – pillars that, even without a regulatory mandate, define the institutional evolution of the market and project an image of responsible, pragmatic and internationally convergent governance.
Conclusion
The fiscal and corporate reforms introduced by the Tax Law marked a turning point in the modernisation of Paraguay’s business framework.
The principle of effective realisation under the IRE offers structurers the ability to design efficient reorganisations without undermining fiscal integrity. Unlike automatic or restrictive regimes elsewhere, Paraguay’s model relies on taxpayer autonomy and ex post administrative review, combining operational simplicity with credible oversight. This pragmatic balance reflects an expanding market where predictability and neutrality are critical to attracting investment and supporting corporate consolidation.
Yet, the current framework faces interpretative rather than regulatory challenges. The absence of consolidated administrative or judicial precedent on issues such as loss continuity, intangible valuation or accounting alignment in cross-border reorganisations necessitates that practitioners ground their advice on technical rigor and economic substance. In practice, professional coherence and prudence fill the gaps that positive law has yet to address.
The challenge ahead will be to reinforce the regime’s technical integrity without compromising its neutrality, gradually integrating principles of economic substance and international consistency while avoiding over-regulation that could render reorganisations fiscally burdensome or procedurally rigid. The balance between simplicity, certainty and control will remain the key to Paraguay’s competitiveness.
Binding rulings issued by the tax authority, notably those on spin-offs and on mergers by absorption, confirm a consistent interpretation: that reorganisations preserving patrimonial continuity and avoiding realisation maintain neutrality, even at the documentary and technological level, as evidenced by their incorporation into the electronic invoicing system.
Together, these developments position Paraguay as an emerging jurisdiction in the Latin American M&A market – predictable, fiscally neutral and increasingly aligned with international standards of governance and transparency.
More than a system in transition, Paraguay’s framework represents a model in consolidation built upon neutrality, coherence and professional practice. Its maturity will depend not on the proliferation of new rules, but also on the clarity and consistency with which the existing ones continue to be applied.
Capitan Juan Dimas Motta 245 esquina Andrade
001408 Asunción
Paraguay
+595 981 547 839
mva@mv-a.com.py www.mv-a.com.py