Laws, Regulations and Industry Codes of Conduct Regulating the Digital Economy
Nigeria does not have a specific law that governs the digital economy, although a Digital Economy and E-Governance Bill is currently in its final legislative stages. Nevertheless, there are several laws and regulations that significantly impact the digital economy in Nigeria, including the following.
Key legal challenges affecting the digital economy in Nigeria include the following.
Companies Income Tax (CIT)
The worldwide profits and gains of a Nigerian company, including profits derived from the provision of digital services and goods are subject to companies income tax (CIT) at the rate of 30%. Small companies (with gross turnover of NGN50 million or less per annum with total fixed assets not exceeding NGN250 million, excluding companies providing professional services, are exempt from CIT.
Under the provisions of Section 17(9)(b) of the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025 and the Companies Income Tax (SEP) Order 2020, a non-resident entity (NRE) is deemed to have a significant economic presence (SEP) in Nigeria and is liable to tax on its profits derived from Nigeria if it:
Withholding Tax
Where any amount is payable by a Nigerian company to another company or person as fees for the provision of technical, professional, management or consultancy services, the company is required to deduct withholding tax (WHT) at the rate of 5% (if the payment is due to another Nigerian company) or 10% (if due to an NRE) and pay it to the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS). The WHT deducted on any of these payments to an NRE is the final tax payable in Nigeria. For all other service payments, the company is required to deduct WHT at the rate of 2% (if the payment is due to another Nigerian company) or 5% (if due to an NRE). This 5% WHT will be the final tax where the service is provided offshore, otherwise, it will be treated as an advance payment of CIT, which an NRE can use to offset its ultimate CIT liability upon filing its tax returns.
Capital Gains Tax
From 1 January 2026, capital gains tax (CGT) will no longer apply as chargeable gains arising from the disposal of digital assets in Nigeria, and will be taxed alongside other income of companies at the applicable CIT rate.
VAT
VAT is levied on the supply of digital services and goods in Nigeria at the rate of 7.5%.
Tax Compliance Management Challenges
NREs that supply digital services to Nigerian customers are required to register with the NRS for VAT purposes, collect VAT on their supplies and remit it to the NRS. In order to fulfil these obligations, an NRE may appoint a local third party as its tax compliance agent.
There are no special rules for the taxation of digital advertising revenues in Nigeria. The tax treatment of digital services applies equally to digital advertising revenues.
Consumer Protection Laws in the TMT Sector
The FCCPA is the principal consumer protection law applicable to digital goods and services in the TMT sector. Certain sectors have their own specific consumer framework. For example, in the financial sector, the CBN issued the Consumer Protection Regulations 2019 and the Consumer Protection Framework 2016 and in the telecommunications industry, there is the Nigerian Communications (Consumer Code of Practice) Regulations 2024.
Upholding Consumer Rights in the Digital Economy
To uphold consumer rights in the digital economy, companies should implement internal policies that will ensure that they comply with applicable consumer protection legislation and embrace transparency and fairness in their dealings with consumers.
Legal Frameworks for the Resolution of Consumer Complaints in the Digital Economy
A consumer can file a complaint via the FCCPC’s consumer portal. In addition to the portal, consumers can also file complaints through other channels such as email, letter, or in-person visits. The NCC, the CBN and other regulators have similar procedures for the filing of complaints.
Handling Consumer Disputes Effectively
To handle consumer disputes effectively, TMT companies should:
Cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology have impacted the legal landscape, necessitating the creation of new regulations. Some key effects include the following.
Regulation
The SEC has introduced rules to regulate digital assets and expanded its regulatory incubation programme to accommodate entities providing services related to cryptocurrencies and other forms of digital assets. The regulation of cryptocurrencies has led to the creation of different licence categories for various VASPs.
Taxation
The NTA defines digital assets as “digital representation of value that can be digitally exchanged, including crypto assets, utility tokens, security tokens, non-fungible tokens (NFT), such other similar digital representation or derivatives of any of the listed or similar assets and any other asset as may be defined by the relevant regulatory authority”.
Profits or gains from transactions in digital assets are subject to CIT at the applicable CIT rate.
Challenges
Anonymity v KYC/AML laws
The pseudonymous nature of cryptocurrencies presents a significant challenge with respect to compliance with KYC and AML laws.
Cross-border legal disputes
Blockchain transactions occur across multiple jurisdictions. This complicates the determination of applicable law and forum for settlement of disputes.
Opportunities
Efficient cross-border operations
Cryptocurrencies eliminate intermediaries in cross-border transactions, reducing costs and delays.
Intellectual property and content management
Automating royalty payments and licensing through smart contracts has the potential to reduce disputes and administrative costs. Blockchain can also provide transparent and tamper-proof records of content ownership and usage, aiding in copyright enforcement.
New business models
Blockchain can enable tokenisation of assets or revenue streams, creating new business models.
Blockchain and Crypto Regulation
Blockchain
In May 2023, following the approval of the Federal Executive Council, the NITDA issued the National Blockchain Policy for Nigeria (the “Blockchain Policy”) as a roadmap for Nigeria’s adoption of blockchain technology. Through the Blockchain Policy, the Nigerian government recognised cryptocurrency as a potential catalyst for the adoption of blockchain. One of the expected outcomes of the Blockchain Policy is the creation of supportive legal and regulatory frameworks that will provide clarity and certainty to persons who intend to adopt blockchain to create innovative solutions in any sector.
Before the introduction of the Blockchain Policy, the NITDA had developed and issued the National Blockchain Adoption Strategy (the “Adoption Strategy”), providing a detailed roadmap and strategy for adopting blockchain. In terms of regulation and legal framework, the Adoption Strategy envisions a principle-based and technology-neutral approach that encourages innovation and development.
Cryptocurrencies
In 2022, the SEC released the Digital Assets Rules. The Digital Assets Rules created various categories of digital assets service providers and their respective registration and licensing requirements, including VASPs, digital asset offering platforms (DAOPs), digital asset custodians (DACs) and digital asset exchanges (DAXs).
However, the Digital Assets Rules were not operationalised and applications for registration or licensing were not accepted by the SEC. In 2024, the SEC issued the ARIP Framework to facilitate the onboarding of qualified cryptocurrency entities into the SEC’s ARIP Framework and provide a path to registration for operators.
The SEC subsequently issued the Exposure of Amendments to the Digital Assets Rules in 2024, which came into effect on 30 June 2025. The amendments to the Digital Assets Rules cover advertisements, marketing and promotion, including third-party/social media promotions and mandate disclosure of paid promotions. Furthermore, the amendments create a new digital assets intermediary (DAI) category to cover persons that are not DAOPs, DAXs or DACs but are facilitating virtual assets transactions.
Similarly, the CBN reversed its prohibition on banks facilitating cryptocurrency transactions, through the issuance of the Guidelines on Operations of Bank Accounts for Virtual Assets Service Providers (the “VASP Guidelines”), which permit financial institutions to open bank accounts for cryptocurrency businesses, provided the requirements set out in the VASP Guidelines are fulfilled, including obtaining a relevant licence or registration from the SEC.
Laws, Regulations and Industry Codes of Conduct in Cloud and Edge Computing
There is no specific legislation on cloud and edge computing in Nigeria. However, the NITDA issued the Nigeria Cloud Computing Policy 2019 (the “Policy”), which applies to public institutions and government-owned corporations. The aim of the Policy is to ensure an increase in the adoption of cloud computing by public institutions and small and medium enterprises that provide digital enabled services to the government.
The Policy requires public sector entities to prioritise the procurement of cloud-based information and communication technologies where a cloud-based offer is essentially equivalent to other kinds of technology solutions.
Restrictions on Certain Industries
As there is no specific legislation on cloud and edge computing, no industry is subject to greater restrictions than others.
Personal Data Processing in the Context of Cloud Computing
In cloud computing, the provisions of the NDPA with regards to processing personal data must be complied with at all times specifically the following.
Laws, Regulations and Industry Codes of Conduct in Relation to the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
There is no legislation that specifically governs the use of AI in Nigeria. However, the provisions of the NDPA, the CA 2022, the FCCPA, the Cybercrimes Act, the SEC Rules on Robo-Advisory Services 2021 etc may all impact the use of AI in Nigeria.
Deepfake Technologies
The CA 2022 protects original works of creators, including literary, musical and artistic works, audiovisual, sound recordings and broadcasts. The CA 2022 recognises and protects the moral rights of the original creators of works that are eligible for copyright protection. Therefore, where a person’s moral rights are breached by deepfake technologies, the person can have recourse to the remedies provided under the CA 2022.
With respect to a person’s likeness, the CA 2022 protects artistic and cinematographic works, which may include depictions of a person’s personality or image through mediums such as photographs, paintings, sculptures, or cinematography. Consequently, a person’s likeness that has been reduced to an artistic work such as a photograph is protected from unauthorised exploitation. A person’s likeness such as the person’s face, voice and mannerisms qualify as personal data under the NDPA, and as such the use of a person’s likeness needs to comply with the requirements of the NDPA.
Relevant Laws or Regulations About Applications of AI in Transport
There are no laws or regulations that specifically address the application of AI in transport.
Relevant Elements
Liability
Where any harm is caused by an AI system, the developers or users of the AI system, may be liable for such harm under the law of tort.
Data protection
Data protection is an integral aspect of AI as AI systems rely on a vast amount of data to function. Although recourse is not made expressly to processing in the context of AI in the NDPA, the NDPA requires that the data subjects be made aware of the processing of their personal data prior to the commencement of the processing activity. Accordingly, AI developers should inform individuals before they can use the personal data of the individuals to train their AI models. The NDPA also mandates that data controllers (including AI developers and deployers) inform data subjects about the existence of automated decision-making processes.
Intellectual property
The training of AI models with copyrighted materials should comply with the CA 2022. A critical IP consideration is the ownership of AI-generated works. Nigerian IP laws currently lack provisions on ownership of AI-generated works, leaving the ownership of these works in a grey area.
Fundamental human rights
The right to privacy and freedom from discrimination are two essential fundamental human rights provided for in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria (the “Constitution”). AI systems must be built to ensure that the right to privacy is not breached. It is also important to ensure that AI systems are trained on unbiased data to prevent bias and discrimination against any person or a group of people in AI outputs.
Laws, Regulations and Industry Codes of Conduct in Relation to the Internet of Things (IoT)
While there is no specific law on the internet of things (IoT) in Nigeria, the provisions of the NDPA, the Nigeria Communications Act, the Cybercrimes Act and intellectual property laws will all impact the use of IoT technologies.
Relevant Elements
Machine-to-machine communications, communications secrecy and data protection
The IoT primarily thrives on data exchange. To promote confidentiality and integrity of the data, it is necessary that data exchange is done securely. It is therefore expedient to deploy data protection and information security strategies to ensure data protection. Nigeria has enacted adequate data protection laws to ensure safe data processing in the course of deploying the IoT.
The Cybercrimes Act also criminalises intentionally accessing a computer system or network to obtain computer data, gain access to any programme, commercial or industrial secrets or classified information.
Compliance Challenges for IoT Solutions in Nigeria
There are no specific laws on IoT technologies and so it may be difficult for IoT companies to understand the regulatory landscape. Additionally, in deploying IoT solutions, companies are usually faced with requirements to comply with multiple regulations which can be very complex.
Governance Frameworks for Managing IoT Deployments in Nigeria
To manage IoT deployments in Nigeria, companies should implement:
Key Data Sharing Requirements for IoT Companies
IoT companies intending to share data with third parties may enter into a formal data sharing agreement and non-disclosure agreements with third parties. When the data to be shared includes personal data, the IoT companies are required by the NDPA to enter into a data processing agreement with the third party and ensure that the third party:
These data sharing requirements apply to all companies that share personal data with third parties.
Requirements for Specific Categories of Data
The NDPA has particular requirements for two specific categories of data: the personal data of children and sensitive personal data.
Under the NDPA, an IoT company processing a child’s personal data is required to obtain verifiable consent from the child’s parent or legal guardian. The company must also implement robust mechanisms to verify the child’s age and the authenticity of the consent provided.
Sensitive personal data means data relating to an individual’s:
Companies, including IoT companies, are prohibited from processing sensitive personal data except under the following conditions:
The Main Requirements for Providing Audiovisual Media Services
The provision of audiovisual media services in Nigeria is regulated by the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) under the National Broadcasting Commission Act. The NBC requires any applicant requesting a broadcasting licence to meet the following conditions.
Video streaming platforms currently operate in a regulatory grey area with respect to licensing. However, in 2021, the government directed the NBC to commence the licensing of all over-the-top (OTT) media platforms.
The National Film and Video Censors Board (NFVCB) also plays a critical role in regulating films and video content distributed within Nigeria. It issues licences to exhibit films and video works. While streaming and video-sharing platforms are not explicitly mentioned in the National Film and Video Censors Board Act (the “NFVCB Act”), films distributed via these platforms need to comply with the NFVCB Act.
Procedure
Application for a broadcasting licence
Apply to the director general of the NBC specifying the type of licence (eg, free-to-air terrestrial television, FM radio) required.
Submit an application along with the following:
Once approved, an applicant has to pay the prescribed licence fee and sign a licence agreement with the NBC.
A broadcast licence is valid for a period of five years from the date of issuance. The operator must apply for renewal at least six months prior to the licence’s expiration.
The fees for a broadcast licence in Nigeria vary based on the category of licence sought and the geographical coverage of the broadcast station. The fees are as follows.
Technologies and Services Within the Scope of Local Telecommunications Rules
The scope of Nigerian telecommunications laws
Nigerian telecommunications laws regulate all telecommunications services and networks used in Nigeria. Services in this sense include applications services, content services, network services, network facilities services or any combination of these services that facilitate any communication in the form of sound, data, text, visual images, signals or any other form. This includes internet access services, telephone network services, fixed wireless services, Voice over Internet Protocols, satellite communications and content provision services.
Nigerian telecommunications laws also regulate the use of all equipment, systems and technologies applied to communications including customer devices and equipment used for lawful interception of communication.
Requirements for introducing a product or service into the Nigerian telecommunications market
Every individual or corporate body that intends to introduce a product or service into the telecommunications market must ensure that the relevant licence is sought and obtained from the NCC. The applicant must also be an incorporated entity under Nigerian laws. Furthermore, the applicant must ensure that the product or service complies with technical regulations issued by the NCC. The applicant may also have to get clearance from other relevant agencies like the Standards Organisation of Nigeria.
Relevant security requirements for telecommunications services
Protection of consumer information
Providers of telecommunications services are required to ensure the protection of consumer information in line with Nigeria’s data protection laws. They are also required to disclose the security measures adopted to protect the information of consumers.
National interest
The NCA obligates a telecommunications services provider to use its best endeavours to prevent the network facilities it owns or provides, or its services, from being unlawfully accessed or used.
Rules and Regulations Around Net Neutrality
Regulatory framework
The issue of net neutrality is primarily regulated by the provisions of the Internet Code of Practice (the “Internet Code”) issued by the NCC. The Internet Code grants internet users the right to access and distribute information and content, use and provide applications and services and use appropriate terminal equipment of their choice. No lawful content, applications or services are to be blocked or made unavailable to users of internet services. No lawful content, applications or services will be discriminated against by any internet access service provider.
Internet service providers (ISPs) will treat all lawful traffic within the same service category equally, without discrimination, restriction or interference, irrespective of the sender and receiver, the content accessed or distributed, the applications or services used or provided or the terminal equipment used. Similarly, an ISP will not block any lawful content, applications, services or non-harmful devices, with the exception of reasonable network management. An ISP will not impair or degrade lawful internet traffic on the basis of internet content, source, destination, application or service or use of a non-harmful device, with the exception of reasonable network management. An internet access service provider is prohibited from engaging in preferential data prioritisation under any circumstances.
Impact on the telecommunications sector
ISPs are obligated to take reasonable measures to prevent unlawful content on the internet while promoting consumers’ right to an open internet. Effectively, the regulatory landscape facilitates a telecommunications industry that promotes innovation and prevents unfair and anti-competitive practices in the sector. For example, the Internet Code, which prohibits the blocking of any lawful internet service, prevents arrangements by big players in the telecommunications sector to stifle upcoming industry players in order to protect their position and revenue inflow.
Impact of Technologies Like 5G, IoT and AI on the Telecommunications Legal Landscape
The rapid advancement of 5G, IoT and AI has significantly transformed the legal landscape of telecommunications. These technologies demand a more robust regulatory framework to address critical issues like spectrum allocation, data protection, cybersecurity, intellectual property, consumer protection and antitrust regulations.
With respect to 5G, telecommunications investments and terrestrial fibre infrastructure in Nigeria are concentrated in large commercial cities like Lagos, Abuja and Port Harcourt, creating an infrastructure gap in rural areas. To bridge this gap, network infrastructure sharing, particularly for 5G, is essential. The NCC has issued 5G spectrum licences to two telecom providers. If these licensed operators share their 5G infrastructure with other operators, telecommunications coverage can easily be extended to underserved areas.
Although AI is relatively new and its impact on the telecommunications sector is in its infancy, it will play an important role in the deployment of 5G, especially in the areas of resource allocation, efficient spectrum usage and intelligent traffic steering.
The rise of IoT technologies has implications for the type of approval process of telecommunications equipment. As IoT devices proliferate, regulators will need to develop and implement updated type approval certification standards to address the unique characteristics of these new technologies.
Legal Considerations for TMT Companies in Integrating Emerging Technologies
Companies integrating emerging technologies in Nigeria should be aware of the following.
Data protection and privacy concerns
With 5G, IoT and AI technologies enabling the faster and more efficient transfer of personal data, including cross-border transfers of personal data, it is essential for companies to comply with the requirements of the NDPA. Essentially, companies should implement procedures to enable data subjects to exercise their rights.
Consumer protection
Compliance with the provisions of the FCCPC and other sector-specific consumer protection laws is essential. Companies must avoid unfair trade practices and provide clear terms of service in line with relevant consumer protection laws.
Freedom against discrimination
Companies must ensure AI systems are designed to avoid bias and discriminatory outcomes, aligning their efforts with Nigeria’s constitutional principles of equality and non-discrimination.
Tax implications
Tax implications are significant, particularly for digital businesses. Understanding and complying with digital tax laws is crucial.
Cybersecurity
Companies must anticipate ways these technologies may be exploited for cybercrimes and implement safeguards that align with Nigerian cybersecurity regulations and frameworks. The NDPA requires companies to adopt appropriate technical and organisational measures to protect information technology systems from unauthorised interference.
Main Challenges Faced by Organisations Entering into a Technology Agreement
Regulatory and compliance challenges
Given Nigeria’s complex and sometimes uncertain regulatory environment, with several laws and regulations, agencies and guidelines governing the technology sector, organisations have the burden of ensuring that their technology agreements comply with all these laws and regulations.
Increased cost
Technology transfer agreements in Nigeria are subject to mandatory registration with the National Agency for Technology Acquisition and Promotion (the “NOTAP”). Failure to do so will result in the Nigerian party being unable to remit payments through the official foreign exchange market. The NOTAP has specific guidelines regarding fee limits payable under the agreement, as well as certain local content requirements. Without these the technology agreement will not be registered.
Cross-border legal and jurisdictional issues
Technology agreements, such as technology transfer agreements, often involve cross-border collaborations. This can create complexities in contract enforcement. If the technology provider is based outside Nigeria, enforcing the agreement in case of a breach may pose significant challenges for the Nigerian party.
Data protection and data privacy concerns
Technology agreements that involve cross-border transfer of data face particular challenges, as they must comply with the additional requirement under the NDPA with respect to cross-border transfer of data.
Mandatory or Excluded Laws to be Taken into Account
Several requirements are mandated by certain regulations which parties cannot exclude by contract when entering into technology agreements in Nigeria. These include the following.
Price Revision
A telecommunication company cannot revise the prices of their services without the prior approval of the NCC.
Foreign Exchange Controls
The CBN has regulations in place governing foreign exchange transactions in Nigeria. Contracts that involve payments in foreign currencies (e.g., US dollars) need to comply with the applicable exchange control rules. When a party to a contract seeks to repatriate funds in foreign currency through an authorised dealer, such as a commercial bank, they are required to provide relevant documentation, including regulatory approvals such as approval from the NOTAP for technology transfer agreements or approval from the NCC for telecom-related agreements.
Regulated Industries
The financial sector in Nigeria is subject to greater regulations. This is due to the sensitive nature of the data these industries handle, as well as the specific regulatory requirements imposed on them. Consequently, the institutions must comply with both the NDPA and sector-specific regulations such as the CBN’s Cybersecurity Framework and Open Banking Guidelines which impose higher data protection obligations on participants.
Key Elements of Telecommunications Service Agreements
The NCC Nigerian Communications (Consumer Code of Practice) Regulations sets out mandatory terms to be included in a telecommunications service agreement, which are as follows.
Negotiating Favourable Contractual Terms
In negotiating favourable terms in telecommunications service agreements, companies can consider the following strategies.
Considerations for TMT Companies Before Entering Interconnection Agreements
Some factors companies should consider before entering interconnection agreements include the following.
Regulation of Trust Services, Electronic Signatures and Digital Identity Schemes
Regulation of trust services
Under the NITDA Public Key Infrastructure Regulations, the NITDA introduced a voluntary licensing regime for certification authorities. The licensing of a certification authority by the NITDA is an indication to the public that the certification authority is trustworthy and deserving of consumer confidence.
These certification authorities issue digital certificates, which are used to authenticate and verify electronic transactions and digital signatures. Digital certificates issued by licensed certification authorities provide this assurance, ensuring that the transactions are secure, reliable and tamper-free.
Recognition of electronic signatures
With regards to the recognition of electronic signatures, the Nigerian Evidence Act recognises the use of electronic signatures as a means of authenticating electronic records. However, the Act stipulates that an unsecured digital signature will only be deemed reliable if it can be proven that the signature is uniquely linked to the signatory.
Regulation of digital identity in Nigeria
The laws that regulate digital identity in Nigeria include:
The NIMC Act is the primary regulation that provides for digital identity in Nigeria. It established the NIMC. The responsibilities of the NIMC include the creation, management, maintenance and operation of the national identity database. The NIMC Act requires the details of the following persons to be included in the database:
The NCC Regulations
The NCC issued the Registration of Telephone Subscribers Regulations 2011 which provides a regulatory framework for the registration of subscribers to mobile telephone services using subscription medium in Nigeria. Telecommunication companies are required to register each subscriber and ensure that the information of the subscribers is protected and not disclosed to any third party.
Banking and Financial Sector-Specific Regulations
The CBN’s Know Your Customer (KYC) guidelines require banks and financial institutions to verify the identity of customers, often using identity information like national identification numbers or bank verification numbers. This ensures that financial institutions can securely identify their clients.
Relevant Elements
Liability
Licensed certification authorities are required to inform their users of the scope and limitations of certification authorities’ liabilities with respect to the expected reliance to be placed in the information contained in the digital certificates issued by the certification certificates.
Under the NITDA Public Key Infrastructure Regulations, the liabilities of licensed certification authorities are limited. Certification authorities will not be liable for any loss caused by reliance on a false or forged digital signature of a subscriber as long as the certification authorities have complied with the requirements in the NITDA Public Key Infrastructure Regulations.
Data protection
Trust service providers, telecommunication service providers, financial institutions and other organisations are required to put procedures and security controls in place to protect the privacy and confidentiality of the subscribers’ data. Confidential information provided by the subscriber must not be disclosed to a third party without the subscribers’ consent unless the information is required to be disclosed under Nigerian law or a court order.
Laws or Regulations in Relation to the Gaming Industry
Before November 2024, the regulation of lotteries and gaming was done at both the federal and state levels of government. These included:
However, following a Supreme Court decision in November 2024 in the case of Attorney-General of Lagos State & Ors and the Attorney-General of the Federation & Ors, the NLA has been declared void and the regulation of the industry is now limited to the State level.
Key Legal Challenges
Complex and multiple regulatory frameworks
Following the decision of the Supreme Court, the gaming industry is now subject to regulation by multiple state regulators and the FCCPC. The multiple state regulatory frameworks will require operators wishing to engage in lottery and gaming activities to obtain several licences from the various states in which they want to operate.
Licensing and compliance issues
Decentralisation complicates operations by requiring businesses to navigate diverse state regulations on licensing and compliance, leading to higher administrative burdens and costs for multi-state operators.
Remote operations
Online gaming operators licensed in one state (eg, Lagos State) but serving customers in other states may come within the regulatory purview of the various states. This will lead to potential conflicts of authority, regulatory overlap and conflicting legal requirements.
Sector-Specific Issues
Nigeria’s current gaming regulatory framework does not explicitly mention or address in-game purchases or loot boxes, but the laws of the various states could potentially apply. For in-game purchases, the FCCPC may intervene where, for example, a game’s in-game purchase system is misleading or causes harm to consumers or is found to use deceptive tactics to pressure users into making in-game purchases. Similarly, if loot boxes are considered to involve an element of betting or a game of chance, they will fall under the regulatory purview of the relevant state regulator.
Legal Requirements for Game Developers
In Nigeria, it is illegal for persons under the age of 18 to be involved in gambling activities. All operators must ensure that they adhere to responsible gaming policy by ensuring that persons under 18 are prevented from gaming. Consequently, games developers can employ anti-underage gaming measures such as reliable age verification methods or setting up age restriction options to prevent underage gambling.
Furthermore, under the LSLGA, it is a requirement for a grant of a licence for an operator to have measures in place to protect underage people from exploitation or harmful or addictive gaming tendencies. These measures which are to be submitted as part of the application process, will be reviewed and assessed by the LSLGA and serve as a determinant for whether or not it may grant the licence.
While video games are regarded as exempted works that do not require the prior approval of the NFVCB, video games will cease to be classified as such if, to any significant extent, they depict explicit sexual activities, mutilation or torture, acts of gross violence towards humans or animals.
Developers must also adhere to advertising standards, consumer protection laws and privacy regulations. They must ensure that promotional content for games, whether through in-game ads, TV, online ads or other media, complies with the advertising standards in the Nigerian Code of Advertising Practice.
Primary Regulatory Bodies
The primary regulatory bodies overseeing the gaming industry include:
In addition, the Federation of State Gaming Regulators of Nigeria (FSGRN), established in 2025 by the gaming regulators of some of the states in Nigeria, plays a co-ordinating and oversight role by fostering collaboration among state gaming and lottery regulators to promote uniform regulatory standards, enhance compliance and transparency, protect stakeholders, and reduce underage gaming across Nigeria.
Enforcement Powers
The enforcement powers of the regulators include:
Examples of Recent Enforcement Actions
In 2024, Netbet, Wakabet and Supabets were shut down for operating without licences. The management of the unlicensed operators were also arrested and face possible prosecution.
Following the Supreme Court’s decision nullifying the NLA, the Lagos State Lottery and Gaming Authority issued a directive requiring all gaming operators in Lagos to regularise their operations by obtaining the necessary licences. The NLA further warned that non-compliance would result in enforcement actions against operators.
Common IP Challenges
Some common IP challenges faced by game developers are the following.
Game cloning
The rampant practice of copying game concepts, characters, and storylines without proper authorisation from the authors.
Software piracy
The illegal/unauthorised copying and distribution of game software.
Trade mark squatting
Competing brands maliciously register trade mark(s) similar to existing game titles or characters to profit from the established trade mark’s reputation.
Counterfeiting
Counterfeiting of game mechanics and technology is another common challenge.
Creator Rights
In Nigeria, creators can protect their rights under the CA 2022 which affords creators protection over their literary and artistic works/expressions in a game, including the game’s source codes, artwork and associated music to prevent unauthorised use or reproduction.
Creators can protect their rights by registering their branding materials such as names, logos, colours or any other distinctive features as trade marks. Trade marks prevent others from using similar brand identity materials in the gaming industry.
Creators also have the right to protect the process/method involved in producing their product if the process is novel, results from an inventive activity and is capable of industrial application. This right also prevents others from using, making or selling the process without permission from the creator.
Key Considerations for Copyright in Digital and Virtual Assets
When dealing with copyright in digital and virtual assets, several key considerations arise. These include the following.
Originality
Copyright protects original works in that the creator of the work must have expended sufficient efforts to give the work an original character. With respect to virtual assets, it is critical for the creator of the asset to show that this threshold of originality is satisfied.
Ownership of copyright
The CA 2022 states that unless there is an agreement stating otherwise, the copyright in a work belongs to the person who created the work. It is necessary to clarify the ownership of virtual assets.
Rights in derivative works
Virtual assets typically build on or incorporate pre-existing works. The creation of derivative works based on pre-existing works requires permission from the original copyright holder unless the pre-existing work is deemed to be part of works in the public domain.
Applicability of Trade Mark Laws to Virtual Goods and Services
Trade mark laws apply to both physical and virtual goods and services. Trade marks are governed primarily by the Trademarks Act in Nigeria. The Trademarks Act is designed to protect marks associated with goods and services in the course of trade. While the Trademarks Act does not explicitly mention virtual goods and services, its principles may be extended to these categories of goods and services.
Nigeria utilises the Nice Classification of Goods and Services and under Class 42 of the Nice Classification, trade marks can be registered in respect of scientific and technological services including:
It is therefore possible for the Trademarks Registry to recognise and register trade marks for virtual goods and services.
Implications of User-Generated Content on IP Rights
User-generated content (UGC) refers to any form of content created by an individual. Users who create content, such as videos, images, music or text, often own the copyright to their original works. This grants them the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute and licence their content. Many platforms require users to grant broad licences to the platforms for the use and distribution of their content, potentially limiting the creator’s control.
While UGC is protected by copyright, the creators of the work may find it difficult to exercise any of their exclusive rights, especially where the works have been shared on social media platforms like Facebook or TikTok. This is because it is somewhat easy for other users of the platform to copy the works without permission.
Laws and Regulations Relevant to Social Media
Code of Practice for Interactive Computer Service Platforms/Internet Intermediaries
The Code aims to combat online harm by regulating platforms like social media where users share or access content.
CA 2022
The CA 2022 contains provisions empowering the copyright owner to notify social media platforms to take down or disable access to infringing content or links hosted on the platform.
Cybercrimes Act
The Act criminalises identity theft, cyber bullying, harassment, online fraud, the dissemination of false information, the distribution of obscene or pornographic content, phishing and unauthorised access to computer systems. The use of social media platforms to facilitate any of these offences such as spreading false information via Facebook with the intent to disrupt public order or distributing obscene or pornographic content through TikTok carries legal consequences.
National Broadcasting Commission Act
The broadcasting laws prohibit the broadcast of contents that contain hate speech or contents that incite violence. Broadcasts should also not contain contents that promote discrimination on the grounds of ethnicity, religion, gender, etc. The use of social media platforms to violate these requirements attracts penalties.
The NDPA and GAID
The disclosure of someone’s personal data on social media without authorisation and without any lawful basis can lead to legal actions under the NDPA. Consequently, users of social media must adhere to the NDPA and GAID. The social media platforms must also comply with the NDPA and GAID and ensure that users’ personal data is secured and processed in line with the NDPA.
Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria Act 2022
This Act governs advertising in Nigeria, extending its scope to online advertisements. Under its provisions as well as the provisions of the Nigerian Code of Advertising Practice, advertisers are required to obtain prior approval from the ASP before any advertisement is made available to the Nigerian market.
Key Legal Challenges
With respect to social media, the key legal challenges are as follows.
Primary Social Media Regulatory Bodies
The NITDA
The NITDA oversees the IT sector, including social media platforms. It also promotes the ethical use of technology, including social media.
Its enforcement powers include investigations of complaints of violations of the law related to social media platforms and issuing take down orders.
The NBC
Traditionally focused on radio and television broadcast, the NBC has extended its oversight to digital media.
Its enforcement powers include issuing take down orders and removing false information likely to cause public disorder.
The NDPC
The NDPC ensures that social media platforms collect and process users’ data transparently and lawfully. It mandates platforms to inform users about the purpose and use of their data.
Its enforcement powers include investigating any complaints related to data protection violations, conducting inspections of entities, issuing orders and directives and imposing penalties and fines.
The ARCON
The ARCON was established to regulate advertising in Nigeria, and as such it is responsible for ensuring that adverts exposed online comply with the advertising laws.
Its enforcement powers include imposing fines on organisations that expose adverts without the approval of the ASP. It can also demand organisations take down offending adverts.
The FCCPC
The FCCPC is responsible for consumer protection. It also ensures that users of social media platforms are protected against unfair commercial practices.
It has the power to impose fines on undertakings that violate consumer protection laws after conducting investigations.
Recent Enforcement Actions
In 2024, the FCCPC fined Meta Platforms USD220 million for violations of data protection laws. This was after a joint investigation by the FCCPC and the NITDA (the erstwhile data protection regulator) into the practices of Meta Platforms between May 2021 and December 2023.
Separately, in February 2025, the NDPC imposed a USD32.8 million administrative fine on Meta Platforms for alleged violations of the NDPA. Meta Platforms challenged the fine and the accompanying compliance directives before the Federal High Court, Abuja, seeking to set them aside. Subsequently, the parties entered into negotiations, which culminated in an out-of-court settlement. The agreed settlement terms were adopted by the court as a consent judgment in November 2025, thereby resolving the dispute.
The ARCON filed a lawsuit against Meta Platforms claiming NGN30 billion and a declaration that the continued publication and exposure of various advertisements targeting the Nigerian market through Facebook and Instagram, without ensuring the adverts are vetted and approved prior to exposure, is illegal, unlawful and in violation of Nigeria’s advertising laws.
Key Data Privacy Laws and Regulations
The NDPA and GAID
The NDPA is the primary legal framework governing the processing of all personal data in Nigeria, including within the telecommunications sector. Similarly, the GAID, issued as subsidiary legislation under the NDPA and providing operational and compliance guidance, applies equally to entities in the telecommunications industry.
NCC Regulations
Other than the draft Data Protection (Communications Services) Regulations issued by the NCC in 2023, there is currently no standalone, data-protection-specific regulation made by the NCC. Nonetheless, data privacy and protection principles are embedded across existing NCC regulatory instruments, including the Nigerian Communications (Consumer Code of Practice) Regulations 2024, the NCC Registration of Telephone Subscribers Regulations, and the NCC Mobile Number Portability Regulations, 2014, which impose obligations relating to the confidentiality, security, and lawful handling of subscriber and consumer information.
Cybercrimes Act
The Cybercrimes Act contains provisions requiring the preservation and retention of “traffic data”, which may oblige telecommunications service providers to retain subscriber and traffic data for the purpose of complying with lawful law enforcement requests. In practice, this obligation is commonly interpreted as requiring retention for up to two years, subject to lawful access and due process requirements.
The Lawful Interception of Communications Regulations 2019
The NCC’s Lawful Interception of Communications Regulations establish the framework for the authorised interception of communications in Nigeria, permitting interception only by designated security and law enforcement agencies and strictly pursuant to lawful authority, such as a court order. Under this regime, telecommunications licensees are required to maintain the necessary technical capabilities and to co-operate with authorised requests for interception or disclosure, subject to due process and applicable legal safeguards.
Main Challenges in Managing Customer Data
Telecommunications companies face distinct compliance challenges due to the scale, sensitivity, and granularity of the data they process, such as location data, call detail records, and biometric identifiers. The main challenges include the following.
Cross-Border Transfers and Data Localisation
Nigeria maintains a strict data localisation approach for the telecommunications sector, with NCC and NITDA guidelines generally requiring subscriber and consumer data to be hosted within Nigeria. Where cross-border transfers are necessary, the NDPA permits them only where the recipient country provides adequate protection or where NDPC-approved safeguards such as Standard Contractual Clauses or Binding Corporate Rules are in place. Data relating to government functions or critical national infrastructure is subject to even stricter local storage and security requirements.
Balancing Lawful Interception and Surveillance Obligations with Data Privacy Protections
Telecommunications operators must carefully balance customer privacy obligations with national security and law enforcement requirements. Under the NCC’s Lawful Interception of Communications Regulations 2019, operators are required to deploy and maintain technical interception capabilities that enable authorised agencies to access communications data. To guard against arbitrary surveillance, access to communications data is generally subject to judicial oversight, with law enforcement agencies typically required to obtain a warrant or court order, which operators must verify before granting access. In parallel, statutory data retention obligations apply: the Cybercrimes Act mandates the retention of traffic data and subscriber information for up to two years. The Nigerian Communications (Consumer Code of Practice) Regulations 2024 require the retention of billing and related records for a minimum of two years.
Role of Third-Party Vendors and Cloud Providers
Telecommunications operators rely on vendors and cloud service providers, which introduces additional data protection considerations. Under the NDPA, operators acting as data controllers must execute formal Data Processing Agreements with vendors acting as processors, and remain legally liable for any privacy breaches by these third parties. Operators are also required to conduct due diligence and regular audits to ensure that vendors implement adequate technical and organisational measures, such as encryption, access controls, and incident response mechanisms consistent with Nigerian law. The use of global cloud services is further complicated by data localisation requirements, which often necessitate that servers storing Nigerian subscriber and consumer data be physically located within Nigeria to comply with sectoral regulations.
Impact of Evolving Regulations on Infrastructure and Innovation
Evolving regulations in Nigeria serve both as a constraint and a driver of innovation in the telecommunications sector. Privacy by Design is required under the NDPA and the GAID, with new network deployments such as 5G necessitating Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) during the design phase to embed privacy into hardware and software architectures. Also, data localisation mandates compel operators to invest in local data centres, increasing infrastructure costs compared with using global cloud clusters. At the same time, consumer trust is emerging as a competitive differentiator, with operators developing privacy-preserving services such as secure messaging and digital identity management to appeal to privacy-conscious users.
Primary Legal and Operational Challenges
Legal challenges
Digital media providers in Nigeria face a complex and fragmented regulatory landscape. They are required to comply with the NDPA, GAID, sector-specific guidance from NITDA, and general consumer protection rules from the FCCPC. Aligning obligations across these legal frameworks creates legal uncertainty. Consent management presents another significant challenge, as the NDPA requires consent to be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous. Many platforms historically relied on implied consent, bundled consent, or pre-ticked boxes, which now expose them to compliance risk. Platforms that serve minors or engage in behavioural advertising must navigate heightened obligations regarding children’s data and profiling, including obtaining verifiable parental consent and age validation without excessive data collection. Finally, cross-border data processing remains a critical risk area, as many platforms rely on offshore hosting, and the NDPA restricts international transfers unless adequate safeguards, such as approved transfer mechanisms, are in place.
Operational challenges
On the operational side, digital media platforms grapple with the sheer volume and velocity of data they process. High-volume, real-time flows of behavioural, location, and preference data make strict data minimisation difficult to achieve. Furthermore, legacy consent mechanisms pose challenges for digital media platforms, as older platforms often lack the ability to track granular user preferences for analytics, personalisation, and advertising, necessitating significant system redesigns. Also, implementing robust security measures, including encryption, access controls, logging, and monitoring introduces trade-offs with performance, latency, and ad-delivery efficiency.
Implementing Privacy-by-Design and Security-by-Design
Digital media companies are increasingly embedding privacy and security into the design of their products and systems rather than treating them as afterthoughts.
Privacy-by-Design measures include the following.
Security-by-Design measures include the following.
Challenges of Third-Party Data Sharing
Digital media platforms face significant challenges when sharing user data with third parties, including advertisers, analytics providers, and other partners. Key challenges include the following.
Risk management strategies adopted by media platforms include the following.
Impact of Emerging Regulations on Operations and Agreements
Emerging cybersecurity requirements are reshaping both the operations and technology agreements of digital media platforms. Operationally, platforms face higher compliance costs, including investments in security operations centres, monitoring tools, forensic readiness, and specialised personnel. They must maintain mandatory incident readiness, detecting, responding to, and reporting breaches promptly. Additionally, product deployment timelines are often extended, as new features undergo thorough security and privacy reviews prior to launch.
These operational pressures are reflected in technology and vendor agreements. Contracts increasingly include strong security clauses, such as minimum security standards, penetration testing, audit co-operation, and cyber-insurance requirements. Vendors are expected to accept breach liability and indemnities, and data localisation and transfer obligations covering hosting location, encryption key ownership, and government access, have become critical negotiation points. Platforms also retain termination rights for cyber non-compliance, enabling them to suspend or end vendor relationships following serious security incidents.
4th Floor, Marble House
1 Kingsway Road
PO Box 52901
Falomo
Ikoyi, Lagos
Nigeria
+234 703 413 6930
+234 1 4617 092
lagos@aelex.com www.aelex.com
Nigeria’s technology, media, and telecommunications (TMT) industry is undergoing significant transformation, driven by advancements in innovation, evolving regulations and shifts in economic policy. As one of Africa’s largest and most vibrant markets, Nigeria continues to position itself as a hub for digital innovation. These changes have created new opportunities and challenges, underscoring the need for regulatory and judicial measures aimed at protecting consumer safety, fostering clarity, and promoting sustainable growth without stifling innovation.
This publication aims to provide insight into recent regulatory and judicial actions, as well as broader trends reshaping Nigeria’s TMT sector. It explores their implications for businesses, consumers, and policymakers, offering insights into how these developments are shaping the industry’s future.
Financial Technology
Cryptocurrency
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Exposure of Amendments to the Digital Assets Rules in 2024, is to take effect on 30 June 2025. After years of regulatory uncertainty, the amended Rules now provide a fully functional licensing regime for virtual asset service providers (VASPs), digital asset exchanges, custodians and other intermediaries, while also introducing stricter controls around advertising, promotion and disclosures. Combined with the Central Bank of Nigeria’s decision to permit banks to provide accounts to compliant virtual asset businesses, these developments signal Nigeria’s transition from regulatory experimentation to structured supervision of the cryptocurrency and digital assets ecosystem.
Cryptocurrency and blockchain technology continued to emerge as a rapidly expanding sub-sector within Nigeria’s fintech ecosystem in 2025, with an increasing number of active VASPs and digital asset platforms operating in the country. A defining development was the enactment of the Investment and Securities Act 2025 (ISA 2025), which for the first time explicitly recognised virtual and digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, as securities subject to oversight by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This legal classification brought a significant degree of regulatory clarity to the sector and placed licensing and supervision of VASPs, digital asset exchanges and related service categories squarely within the SEC’s regulatory purview, aligning Nigeria’s framework with capital markets principles.
Under the ISA 2025 regime, VASPs, including exchanges, custodians and other digital asset intermediaries, must register with the SEC and comply with governance, capital, disclosure and anti-fraud requirements under the Act and the SEC’s Digital Assets Rules, while market participants face a clearer pathway to lawful operation and potential investor protection safeguards. The Act’s formal recognition of digital assets as securities has also supported greater institutional interest and broader participation in blockchain-related services, underpinning a shift from regulatory uncertainty to structured oversight across Nigeria’s digital asset economy.
It is, however, important to note that Nigeria’s regulatory treatment of cryptocurrencies in 2025 is not exclusively anchored on securities law. Where a cryptocurrency or digital asset is deployed as a means of payment, rather than as security or an investment or capital market instrument, regulatory oversight falls within the remit of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). In this regard, the CBN continues to exercise jurisdiction over payment system activities pursuant to its statutory mandate to regulate Nigeria’s monetary and financial system. This dual-track regulatory approach reflects a functional classification of digital assets: crypto-assets that operate as securities are supervised by the SEC under the Investment and Securities Act 2025, while those used for payments, remittances or settlement fall within the CBN’s regulatory powers under the payments and financial services framework, including the CBN Act and relevant payments system regulations.
In practical terms, this means that digital asset businesses whose activities straddle both investment and payment use cases may be subject to parallel regulatory obligations to both the SEC and the CBN. While this approach enhances regulatory coverage and risk management, it also raises co-ordination and compliance complexity for operators, and underscores the need for clearer inter-agency guidance on the boundaries between capital markets regulation and payment systems oversight in Nigeria’s evolving digital asset ecosystem.
Rise of insurtech operations
Insurtech has continued to emerge as one of the most dynamic sub-sectors within Nigeria’s fintech ecosystem, driven by sustained efforts to deepen insurance penetration and modernise the delivery of insurance products and services. Over the past year, technology-driven innovators have increasingly deployed digital platforms, data analytics and embedded insurance models to address long-standing challenges in the sector, including low adoption rates, distribution inefficiencies and weak consumer trust. This momentum has resulted in a growing number of insurtech start-ups focused on simplifying policy distribution, premium collection, claims processing and customer engagement through technology.
In response to the growth of technology-driven insurance models, the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) has introduced a dedicated regulatory framework to govern insurtech activities, thereby moving the sub-sector from a largely unstructured innovation space into a regulated segment of the financial services industry. The framework is designed to provide regulatory clarity, safeguard policyholders and ensure that innovation is deployed in a safe, orderly and sustainable manner. It sets out permissible operational models, governance standards and compliance expectations for insurtech operators, and reflects a broader policy shift towards structured supervision of digital insurance solutions. This development is expected to enhance market confidence, support responsible innovation and accelerate the evolution of Nigeria’s digital insurance ecosystem.
FCCPC Digital Lending Regulations 2025
In July 2025, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) issued the Digital, Electronic, Online or Non-Traditional Consumer Lending Regulations 2025, establishing, for the first time, a comprehensive and uniform regulatory framework for digital lending activities in Nigeria. The Regulations apply broadly to all forms of digital and non-traditional consumer lending, including cash loans, airtime and data advances, cashback and other value-based credit offerings delivered through digital platforms. They introduce a mandatory approval and registration regime, impose detailed governance, disclosure, consumer protection, data protection and complaints-handling obligations, and subject non-compliant operators to severe administrative sanctions, including fines of up to NGN100 million or 1% of turnover. Notably, the Regulations assert FCCPC’s jurisdiction over cross-border and multi-state digital lending operations and require existing operators to regularise their arrangements within prescribed transition periods, signalling a decisive shift from fragmented enforcement to structured, proactive supervision of Nigeria’s digital credit market.
For fintech companies operating digital lending platforms, the Regulations fundamentally change the compliance requirements. Operators must now obtain prior FCCPC approval, restructure existing partnerships to fit the prescribed Consumer Lending Services Agreement framework, and significantly upgrade their disclosure, data protection, complaints handling and credit assessment processes. App-based lenders and embedded credit providers will also face higher compliance costs, tighter scrutiny of pricing and recovery practices, and greater exposure to enforcement risk, including delisting and heavy administrative penalties. In practical terms, the Regulations are likely to accelerate market consolidation, weed out non-compliant or under-capitalised players, and push serious operators towards more institutional governance, stronger risk management and closer co-ordination with sector regulators such as the CBN and the NDPC.
It is, however, important to note that the Regulations do not apply to financial institutions duly licensed and regulated by the Central Bank of Nigeria, lending arrangements between employers and employees undertaken strictly pursuant to employment contracts or staff policies, or duly registered and licensed co-operative societies operating in accordance with applicable laws.
Agent banking
In October 2025, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) issued the Guidelines for the Operations of Agent Banking in Nigeria, consolidating and replacing all previous frameworks on agent banking and super-agent licensing. Among other things, the Guidelines introduce a more prescriptive regime covering agent exclusivity, mandatory use of dedicated agent accounts, geo-fencing and geo-tagging of terminals, real-time transaction processing, tighter onboarding and due diligence standards, enhanced reporting obligations to the CBN, and a significantly expanded sanctions framework for non-compliance.
From an operational standpoint, the Guidelines materially raise the compliance and infrastructure bar for banks, payment service banks, mobile money operators, super-agents and other principals. Operators must now invest in stronger technology stacks capable of real-time processing, automated transaction controls, geo-location enforcement, audit trails and direct regulatory reporting. The requirement that all agent transactions be routed through dedicated agent accounts, combined with stricter limits, enhanced monitoring obligations and mandatory integration with PTSAs and CBN systems, means that informal or loosely supervised agent networks will no longer be sustainable. In addition, the exclusivity rule (one agent to one principal) and the tightening of super-agent responsibilities will likely lead to network restructuring, rationalisation of agent footprints and higher onboarding and supervision costs across the ecosystem.
Strategically, the 2025 Guidelines shift agent banking from a volume-driven inclusion tool to a highly regulated, risk-managed distribution channel. While this will increase short-term compliance costs and operational complexity, it is also likely to reduce fraud, improve service quality and strengthen trust in the agent channel. In practical terms, the new regime will favour well-capitalised and well-governed institutions with strong compliance, data and technology capabilities, while smaller or under-resourced operators may be forced to exit, merge or reposition. Agent banking in Nigeria has therefore entered a phase of institutionalisation and consolidation, with regulation, rather than speed of expansion, now defining the competitive landscape.
Payments infrastructure: ISO 20022 migration and mandatory geo-tagging of terminals
In August 2025, the CBN issued a far-reaching directive mandating full migration of all payment messaging to the ISO 20022 standard and the compulsory geo-tagging and geo-fencing of all payment terminals in Nigeria. Under the circular, all domestic and international payment messages must now be formatted in ISO 20022 with complete population of mandatory data fields, including payer and payee identifiers and transaction metadata, with full compliance required by 31 October 2025. In parallel, all PoS and payment terminals must be registered with a Payment Terminal Service Aggregator (PTSA), equipped with GPS-enabled geo-location capability, integrated with the National Central Switch, and configured to transact only within a tightly defined geographic perimeter. The directive forms part of the CBN’s broader push to improve data quality, transaction traceability, fraud detection and regulatory oversight across the payments ecosystem.
From a practical standpoint, this intervention materially raises technology, compliance and operational readiness requirements for banks, fintechs, acquirers, PTSAs, PTSPs and merchants. Operators must upgrade core payment systems to support ISO 20022 end-to-end, re-certify terminals, replace or retrofit non-compliant devices, and re-engineer transaction flows to capture and transmit geo-location data in real time. The geo-fencing requirement will also significantly constrain informal or roaming use of terminals and reduce location-based fraud, but at the cost of higher deployment, monitoring and support expenses. More broadly, the directive signals a decisive shift toward a data-rich, tightly supervised and infrastructure-heavy payments ecosystem, in which scale, systems integration and regulatory compliance capacity will increasingly determine competitive viability.
Growing impact of fraud on the Nigerian fintech ecosystem and regulatory countermeasures
The growth of Nigeria’s fintech industry has remained one of the most important drivers of financial inclusion, innovation and access to financial services across payments, lending, remittances, digital banking and investments. However, this rapid expansion has continued to expose the sector to heightened risks of fraud, cybercrime, identity theft, phishing and money laundering, with significant implications for consumer trust, systemic stability and regulatory confidence. These risks have translated into tangible costs for operators, including financial losses, reputational damage, service disruptions and intensified regulatory scrutiny.
In response, Nigerian regulators have progressively tightened supervisory and enforcement standards. Building on earlier measures such as the CBN Customer Due Diligence Regulations 2023 and the Nigeria Financial Intelligence Unit’s 2024 Guidelines on suspicious transaction reporting, 2025 marked a shift from enforcement to sustained supervision. This culminated in Nigeria’s exit from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Grey List in 2025, reflecting measurable improvements in AML/CFT effectiveness, supervisory co-ordination and enforcement outcomes across the financial services ecosystem, including fintech.
In practical terms, 2025 saw more visible and co-ordinated enforcement actions across the fintech ecosystem, including intensified inspections by regulators, targeted restrictions on customer onboarding by non-compliant operators, licence withdrawals or suspensions in appropriate cases, and the imposition of administrative penalties for breaches of KYC, licence conditions, data protection and consumer protection rules.
This progress has been driven not only by regulatory pressure but also by industry-led initiatives. Fintech operators have continued to invest in more sophisticated fraud detection systems, transaction monitoring tools, customer education and inter-industry collaboration mechanisms such as shared fraud intelligence platforms. Taken together, these developments are gradually shifting the sector from a reactive, enforcement-driven posture to a more preventive and risk-based compliance culture. While fraud and financial crime risks remain structurally present in a fast-growing digital financial system, the strengthened regulatory architecture and more assertive supervisory posture in 2025 are increasingly restoring confidence in the ecosystem and positioning Nigeria’s fintech sector for more sustainable, institutionally credible growth.
In May 2025, the CBN issued an exposure draft of the Baseline Standards for Automated Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Solutions, signalling a regulatory move towards mandatory, system-wide adoption of automated and intelligent AML infrastructure across the financial sector. The proposed standards, which apply to banks, microfinance institutions, payment service providers and other regulated financial institutions, require the deployment of AML systems capable of real-time transaction monitoring, sanctions and politically-exposed persons screening, automated KYC and KYB processes, AI/ML-driven risk scoring, regulatory reporting and case management. The framework is explicitly aligned with FATF standards and global best practices and is designed to eliminate reliance on manual, fragmented and reactive compliance processes. This initiative represents a structural upgrade of Nigeria’s AML/CFT architecture and reinforces the country’s post-grey-list strategy of embedding prevention, detection and enforcement directly into the core technology stack of financial institutions.
For banks, fintechs and payment service providers, the CBN’s AML automation standards will materially increase compliance expectations and technology investment requirements. Operators will be required to either procure or build enterprise-grade AML systems capable of real-time monitoring, advanced risk analytics, automated reporting and deep integration with core banking and payment systems. This will increase short-term compliance and infrastructure costs, but will also significantly reduce regulatory risk, supervisory friction and exposure to enforcement actions over time. Institutions with weak governance, poor data quality or fragmented compliance architecture are likely supervisory sanctions. In practical terms, the standards will accelerate market stratification between well-capitalised, institutionally mature operators and smaller or under-equipped players, and will further entrench technology, data governance and compliance maturity as core competitive factors in Nigeria’s financial services and fintech ecosystem.
Proposed Fintech Regulatory Bill 2025
In 2025, the proposed Fintech Regulatory Bill was introduced before the National Assembly. The Bill is aimed at clarifying supervisory boundaries, reducing regulatory friction and providing a more coherent framework for the oversight of products and business models that straddle payments, banking, capital markets and digital assets. This reflects growing recognition that Nigeria’s current institutional architecture was not designed for the realities of platform-based, multi-product fintech ecosystems.
From a practical standpoint, the Bill, if enacted, would have significant implications for licensing strategy, regulatory engagement and product structuring. Fintech operators would benefit from greater certainty as to their primary regulator, reducing the risk of duplicative approvals, conflicting directives and regulatory arbitrage. At the same time, clearer demarcation of regulatory powers is likely to be accompanied by tighter, more co-ordinated supervision, meaning that while compliance may become more predictable, it may also become more exacting.
Digital Economy and E-Governance
In November 2025, the National Assembly confirmed that Nigeria is on the verge of enacting the National Digital Economy and e-Governance Bill. The Bill, jointly developed by the Senate and House Committees on ICT, Cybersecurity and Digital and Information Technology, is designed to provide Nigeria with a unified legal framework for digital governance, electronic transactions, cybersecurity co-ordination, data exchange across government institutions and the digitisation of public services. Its passage marks a strategic attempt to move Nigeria away from fragmented, paper-based public administration towards a technology-enabled state.
Substantively, the Bill responds to structural weaknesses in Nigeria’s public sector digital infrastructure, including siloed databases across Ministries, Departments and Agencies, weak ICT co-ordination and limited interoperability of government systems. By mandating digitisation of government processes, establishing a unified data exchange framework and providing a legal anchor for emerging technologies, the legislation seeks to improve efficiency, reduce leakages, enhance transparency and strengthen the delivery of public services.
From a practical perspective, once enacted, the Bill will significantly reshape compliance, procurement, data governance and service delivery models for both the public and private sectors. Government agencies will be legally required to digitise workflows, integrate systems and standardise data exchange, which will drive substantial demand for technology, infrastructure and digital transformation services. For businesses, particularly in fintech, telecoms, and data-driven services, the law will create new opportunities but also new compliance obligations, especially around interoperability, data sharing, cybersecurity and interaction with government platforms.
Data Protection
In 2025, the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) decisively shifted from public sensitisation to full-scale regulatory enforcement, signalling that data protection compliance is now a core regulatory and governance issue across Nigeria’s digital economy. A major milestone was the issuance of the General Application and Implementation Directive (GAID), which operationalises key provisions of the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 and provides detailed guidance on lawful processing, cross-border data transfers, data security, audit filings, breach notification, and the obligations of data controllers and processors.
This shift was reinforced by high-profile enforcement actions. In 2025, the NDPC imposed a substantial administrative fine on MultiChoice Nigeria for data protection violations, confirming that large, consumer-facing platforms are now firmly within the Commission’s enforcement sights. In parallel, the NDPC concluded a landmark consent judgment process with Meta, reflecting a more sophisticated enforcement posture that combines corrective measures, compliance commitments and regulatory supervision rather than relying solely on punitive sanctions. Together, these actions signal that enforcement is no longer symbolic, and that businesses are expected to meet Nigerian data protection standards.
Beyond individual cases, the NDPC also commenced sector-focused compliance investigations into organisations operating in the insurance, pension, gaming, banking and insurance brokerage sectors. By a formal Compliance Notice, affected organisations were required to, within 21 days, submit evidence of compliance audit filings, appointment of a Data Protection Officer, implementation of technical and organisational safeguards, and (where applicable) registration as a Data Controller or Processor of Major Importance. The NDPC warned that failure to comply may result in enforcement orders, administrative fines and possible criminal liability. Although the exercise is sector-targeted, it clearly signals that all data controllers and processors are now expected to maintain continuous, demonstrable compliance with the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023. For operators, the practical implication is clear: data protection compliance can no longer be treated as a mere legal requirement. It now directly affects product design, IT architecture, vendor management, cross-border operations, corporate governance and regulatory risk exposure, with real financial, operational and reputational consequences for non-compliance.
Gaming and Lotteries: Transition to State-Based Regulation and the Push for Regulatory Harmonisation
A major structural shift occurred in Nigeria’s gaming and lottery regulatory landscape following the Supreme Court’s decision annulling the National Lottery Act. The decision confirmed that the regulation of lotteries and gaming falls within the legislative competence of the states, effectively ending the era of centralised federal regulation of the sector. In the aftermath of this judgment, states have begun to actively assert and enforce their regulatory authority, while operators have commenced the process of obtaining state-specific licences in each jurisdiction in which they seek to operate. This has resulted in a transition to a decentralised, state-driven licensing and compliance framework for gaming and lottery operations in Nigeria.
While this development restores constitutional clarity, it has also introduced significant compliance complexity for multi-state operators, who are now required to navigate multiple regulatory regimes, licensing processes and enforcement approaches. In response to this emerging fragmentation risk, the Federation of State Gaming Regulators of Nigeria (FSGRN) was established by about 21 out of 36 states in Nigeria. The objective of FSGRN is to promote regulatory co-operation and work towards a more harmonised framework for gaming regulation across participating states. If successfully implemented, the proposed model could allow an operator licensed in one participating state to operate in other participating states without the need to obtain separate licences in each state.
This emerging framework represents an attempt to balance constitutional decentralisation with commercial practicality and regulatory efficiency. While still at an early stage, it signals a policy-driven effort to prevent excessive regulatory fragmentation, reduce compliance friction for operators and preserve a coherent national market for gaming and lottery services under a state-led but co-ordinated regulatory architecture.
For gaming and lottery operators, the regulatory environment significantly alters market entry and compliance strategy. Operators must now reassess their licensing footprint on a state-by-state basis, leading to higher compliance costs, multiple application processes and ongoing exposure to differing regulatory standards and enforcement cultures across states. Business structuring will become more important, particularly in deciding where to locate principal operations, which state licence to prioritise, and how to manage multi-jurisdictional offerings, especially for online and remote gaming platforms. In the absence of a fully operational mutual recognition regime, there is also a heightened risk of forum shopping, as operators may gravitate towards states with more permissive or efficient regimes, potentially triggering inter-state regulatory competition. While the proposed Federation of State Gaming Regulators of Nigeria could, over time, reduce these frictions through harmonisation and mutual recognition, in the short term operators should expect a more complex, fragmented and compliance-intensive operating environment.
Artificial Intelligence
Increased adoption of AI and its regulatory impact
As is the trend globally, AI has moved in Nigeria from experimental deployment to mainstream with adoption accelerating across financial services, telecommunications, education, healthcare, commerce and public administration. In 2025, AI systems are now routinely deployed for fraud detection, credit scoring, customer service automation, language translation, content moderation and predictive analytics. This growing maturity was underscored by the Federal Government’s launch of the Nigerian Atlas for Languages & AI at Scale (N-ATLAS), an open-source multilingual large language model powered by Awarri, designed to support Nigeria’s over 500 languages and position the country as a continental leader in AI-driven digital public goods. The launch of N-ATLAS signals a strategic shift: AI is no longer merely a private-sector productivity tool, but is increasingly being treated as national digital infrastructure for inclusion, governance and economic development.
However, similar to several other jurisdictions, Nigeria lacks a robust and specific legal framework regulating AI, thereby creating a regulatory vacuum that raises legal and ethical concerns. Despite this gap, existing laws can be leveraged to address some of the challenges associated with AI adoption.
AI applications in Nigeria cover a broad range, including predictive analytics and fraud detection in financial services, personalised learning tools in education and customer service across several sectors. These applications are powered by the collection and processing of vast amounts of data, often personal and sensitive. In this context of personal data handling, the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 (NDPA) is relevant. While not AI-specific, the NDPA sets standards for data collection, processing, and storage, ensuring that AI developers and users have a statutory guide and are able to mitigate risks of data misuse and privacy violations, which are prevalent concerns in AI systems. Furthermore, the NDPA addresses the use of automated decision-making processes that significantly impact data subjects, ensuring that individuals are protected from AI-driven decision making.
Similarly, consumer protection is another area where existing laws can help address gaps created by the absence of comprehensive AI regulation. The use of AI in consumer-facing applications, such as e-commerce or customer service, could result in unfair practices, discrimination, or harm. In this regard, the provisions of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018 (FCCPA) play a crucial role by protecting consumers from unfair and deceptive practices, promoting accountability, ensuring redress mechanisms and mandating transparency and fairness.
Cybersecurity is another critical area impacted by AI adoption. While AI systems enhance efficiency, they also create vulnerabilities, including exposure to cyber-attacks and the risk of deploying biased or harmful algorithms. In this regard, Nigeria’s Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Act 2015 provides a useful framework to address cyber threats, covering offences such as hacking and unauthorised data access, which could be exploited in AI-driven environments.
Also, copyright law is relevant in the AI landscape as generative AI systems create content such as music, art and literature. In this respect, the Copyright Act 2022 recognises the rights of authors over their creations, but does not explicitly address issues surrounding AI-generated works, which raises questions about ownership, attribution, and licensing.
Despite the limitation of the Copyright Act in addressing AI authorship, the CA 2022 empowers the Nigerian Copyright Commission (NCC) to demand information and access any database relating to copyright, without warrant. This means that the NCC can potentially demand that an AI deployer provides access to the underlying data used in training its model, to ascertain if it was developed using copyrighted information.
While the above laws apply to certain aspects of AI, their general nature may limit their effectiveness in addressing the unique challenges AI technologies pose, such as algorithmic bias and accountability for autonomous decisions.
Notably, the Nigerian government has demonstrated keen interest in AI by developing a national AI strategy under the Ministry of Communications, Innovation, and Digital Economy. It is expected that this strategy will establish a clear path to the development of regulations to support and promote responsible AI practices and provide necessary protection in Nigeria.
Telecommunications
NCC Guidelines on Corporate Governance
In 2025, the NCC issued the Guidelines on Corporate Governance for Telecommunications Licensees, aimed at strengthening board oversight, transparency, ethical conduct and internal control frameworks within licensed operators. The Guidelines align the telecoms sector with broader corporate governance standards, and introduce more prescriptive expectations around board composition, risk management structures, compliance functions, conflict-of-interest management and accountability at senior management level.
From a practical perspective, the Guidelines require telecoms operators to revisit board structures, committee compositions, internal control systems and compliance reporting lines. For many operators, particularly indigenous or fast-growing licensees, this will entail additional costs in board recruitment, governance advisory, internal audit and compliance infrastructure. More importantly, governance lapses are now more likely to translate into regulatory exposure, meaning that enforcement risk is no longer limited to technical or service quality issues, but extends directly into boardroom conduct and organisational design.
Draft Regulatory Guidelines on Use of the Lower 6 GHz Spectrum
As part of its spectrum management reform agenda, the NCC in 2025 issued Draft Guidelines on the use of the Lower 6 GHz band, aimed at supporting next-generation wireless technologies, network densification and innovative broadband use cases. The exposure reflects the Commission’s attempt to proactively plan for future capacity demands and to align Nigeria’s spectrum policy with emerging global trends in 5G, Wi-Fi evolution and high-capacity wireless infrastructure.
For operators, the practical implication is both strategic and capital-intensive. The opening of the 6 GHz band creates new deployment opportunities, but also requires careful spectrum planning, equipment investment and regulatory engagement. Early movers may gain competitive advantage in high-capacity data services, but the eventual rules are also likely to reshape spectrum acquisition costs, network architecture decisions and long-term infrastructure investment strategies.
Public consultation on Draft Regulatory Instruments
In 2025, the NCC commenced a public consultation on key regulatory instruments, including the Draft Licensing Regulations, proposed updates to the Enforcement Processes Regulations, and the Draft Internet Code of Practice, reflecting a strategic effort to modernise Nigeria’s telecoms regulatory framework. The Draft Licensing Regulations, in particular, propose a significant tightening of requirements around corporate structure, ownership, technical competence, financial capacity and ongoing eligibility of licensees, while strengthening the NCC’s powers over licence lifecycle management, dormant licences and restructuring transactions. If adopted substantially in their current form, these reforms will materially affect market entry strategy, transaction structuring, M&A activity, internal reorganisations and ongoing compliance planning across the sector.
At the same time, the proposed Enforcement Processes Regulations, together with the Draft Internet Code of Practice, signal a shift towards a more active regulator and an expansion of regulatory oversight into online services and platform-like activities. In practical terms, operators should expect more frequent compliance audits, more formalised investigations and greater exposure to enforcement actions, while ISPs and digital service providers may need to invest in content governance, complaints handling systems, user protection mechanisms and enhanced internal compliance frameworks. Taken together, the 2025 consultation process points to a future in which regulatory strategy becomes a core business function rather than a mere regulatory obligation.
Telecoms cybersecurity regulatory framework
Throughout 2025, the NCC advanced work on a telecoms cybersecurity regulatory framework aimed at harmonising network security, incident reporting, resilience standards and risk management across the sector. Although not yet finalised, the initiative reflects increasing regulatory concern about national infrastructure security, data breaches, service disruptions and systemic cyber risk.
This signals that cybersecurity is moving from a technical IT issue to a core regulatory compliance obligation. Operators should expect future requirements around audits, breach notification, resilience testing and possibly sector-wide security benchmarks. This will drive higher compliance costs, deeper board-level oversight of cyber risk, and closer integration between technical security teams and regulatory functions.
NCC approves spectrum lease and national roaming arrangement between MTN and T2 Mobile
In 2025, the NCC approved a spectrum leasing arrangement between MTN Nigeria and T2 Mobile (formerly 9Mobile), under which MTN will lease 5MHz in the 900MHz band and 15MHz in the 1800MHz band for a three-year period commencing 1 October 2025. This transaction represents one of the most significant recent examples of active spectrum trading and secondary market use of spectrum in Nigeria, and reflects a growing regulatory willingness to support more flexible and efficient spectrum utilisation to address capacity constraints and improve quality of service.
The spectrum lease is strategically linked to the national roaming agreement executed between the parties in June 2025, which allows T2 Mobile subscribers to roam on MTN’s network in areas where T2’s coverage is limited. Taken together, the two arrangements signal a policy shift towards deeper infrastructure sharing. In particular, this model provides a regulatory pathway for smaller or capacity-constrained operators to remain competitive without duplicating capital-intensive infrastructure, while enabling larger operators to optimise spectrum holdings and monetise network investments in a manner consistent with the NCC’s objectives.
FCCPC and NCC partnership
The 2025 Memorandum of Understanding between the FCCPC and the NCC marks a decisive shift away from siloed regulation of Nigeria’s telecommunications sector towards co-ordinated, joint enforcement of consumer protection and competition rules. By formalising co-operation and information sharing between both regulators, the MoU increases the likelihood of faster, broader and more integrated regulatory interventions in issues such as pricing, billing disputes, service quality, contract terms and market conduct.
For operators, the practical effect is a clear escalation in regulatory risk. Telecoms and digital service providers now face the prospect of parallel or joint investigations and sanctions, with limited room for jurisdictional arguments. This will require stronger internal governance around consumer protection and competition compliance, and a more strategic, cross regulatory approach to regulatory engagement and risk management.
4th Floor, Marble House
1 Kingsway Road
PO Box 52901
Falomo
Ikoyi, Lagos
Nigeria
+234 703 413 6930
+234 1 4617 092
lagos@aelex.com www.aelex.com