Contributed By Ulises Cabrera
Regulatory Body
Decree No. 4807 contemplated a process before the regulatory body “Rental and Eviction Control” when an owner needed access to a property or to occupy it for repair purposes. However, as part of the effect of the ruling of the Constitutional Court and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice (Ruling No. TC/0174/14, Ruling No. TC/0208/21), it was rendered powerless, and in practice said regulator has no useful functions.
Owners’ Rights
The owner has the right to access the property for repairs, but this requires the tenant’s authorisation. If authorisation is not granted, the owner must request authorisation from the court. The same applies in the event that, instead of access, a request is made to hand over the property in order to carry out repairs or for it to be occupied by the owner himself or herself (when applicable).
According to article 1724 of the Civil Code, urgent repairs are assumed by the tenant at their cost, and if the repairs last more than 40 days, the rent will be reduced proportionately.
Should an amicable solution not be reached, the owner may file a lawsuit in court to terminate the rental contract and evict the tenant. These proceedings begin in a first-degree court (justice of the peace, expected to take one year or less) and, if successful, conclude with a ruling that allows immediate eviction, even if the tenant appeals the court decision.
The tenant may stop the execution of the judgment that ordered their eviction by means of a judicial process called “referral”, until the appeal is finalised.
This process is usually completed in the court of first instance within one to three months.
In emergency situations, there are two alternative and accelerated routes that property owners could use, depending on the nature of the case:
Action in Referral
This is an accelerated process that can be requested on the basis of the existence of an emergency situation that could cause irreversible damage or on the basis that illegal acts are being committed and have been clearly perceived.
Action for Protection (Amparo)
This is a speedy process intended to protect the fundamental rights of the individual as defined by the Dominican Constitution in its articles 37 to 67 (right to life, property, education, protection of minors, senior citizens, the environment, etc), when no other remedy is available.
For this action to be justified, the violation of the right must:
The limitation with this action is that if there is another way to remedy the violation, namely, another available judicial process, it is not admissible by the court.
Property owners are solely responsible to the neighbours for any damage caused by the property, and the tenant is liable for any damages caused by him or her to third parties.
The owner has a right of recourse against the tenant, if the owner is forced to compensate neighbours for damages caused by the property due to a lack of repairs not carried out because the tenant denied the owner access.
The trend for several years has been for rental agreements to include a requirement that the tenant takes out an insurance policy with a reputable insurance company in favour of the owner for damages to third parties.
In the event of harassment by the landlord, the tenant may try to resolve the issue amicably; otherwise, the issue must be brought to the courts either to defend against intimidating claims or to request remediation or protection. A tenant can also seek compensation for damages, be they material or moral, caused by the owner’s actions.
The most common remedy is a “referral” to lift the seizures on bank accounts.
When dealing with situations of a criminal nature, it is necessary to go to the prosecutor’s office to obtain a restraining order, a protection order or similar.
Vertical residential buildings (apartment blocks) are regulated by Law No. 5038, which establishes the rules for incorporating and operating condominiums. Its stipulations are binding.
For horizontal residential areas not incorporated under the aforementioned law, the owners usually create a “neighbourhood council” that is registered with city hall, but its decisions are not binding.
Both the above require the payment of maintenance fees, the preservation of common areas, and other responsibilities.
In other cases, there are tourist projects, where the developer forces the purchasers to accept contractual terms and conditions regarding the rules of coexistence and administration of the residential area.
Effects of Conflict Situations Between Owner and Tenant
A conflict between a tenant and an owner has no consequences, unless maintenance fees usually covered by the owner are owed and that is part of the conflict at hand.
Should the condominium, owner or council restrict access in any way to the tenant, the tenant may warn them of potential legal action should they not remedy the situation, which may include monetary compensation.
If the above is insufficient, then the judicial route is used through the expedited referral or protection action process.
Although there is no legal concept of “harassment”, there is extensive and comprehensive legislation aimed at protecting the rights of persons, be they natural or legal, by means of interpretation of the owner’s actions to determine what violations of those rights have occurred in order to identify the appropriate legal route.
There is a wide range of consequences that an owner could face, and it will depend on the nature of the violation – which can only be determined by the competent courts – but, in most cases, it will be a matter of financial penalties with the aim of compensating the victim.
In the Dominican Republic, the concept of “statutory tenancies” does not exist, and property owners are protected by the Dominican Constitution (article 51), which states that no owner may be restricted, limited or prevented from the use, enjoyment and benefit of his or her property.
Therefore, landlords will always have the right to terminate a lease, either due to the end of its term, or early (provided this is in a reasonable manner), or due to non-compliance by the tenant. No person may, by virtue of their occupancy of a registered property (which has title), become its owner or indefinite occupant without the consent of the legal owner.
See 1.3.1 Statutory Tenancies: Types and Differences.
See 1.3.1 Statutory Tenancies: Types and Differences.
See 1.3.1 Statutory Tenancies: Types and Differences.
Governed by the Lease Agreement
A tenant’s failure to comply with a cure period may or may not be of contractual consequence, depending on the lease agreement’s terms and conditions.
If there is no provision in the lease agreement regarding time limits for remedies and/or penalties for non-compliance, the tenant is not obliged to carry out the remedy within the time period required by the landlord. The landlord must reach an amicable settlement with the tenant or go to court to claim any right related to compliance with what the landlord is demanding from the tenant.
Tenant Solutions
In the event that a tenant disagrees with the application of the contractual penalty or the landlord demands a remedy within an unachievable period, the tenant may:
If the referral action requested by the tenant is rejected, the decision can be appealed and later on appealed in cassation before the Supreme Court of Justice.
At the same time, a separate lawsuit can be filed by the tenant to claim a right or the fulfilment of an obligation by the owner in defence to any action taken by the owner to justify the failure to comply with the remedy within the required period. This could take years.
See 1.2.1 Landlord Harassment, 1.4.1 Injunctive Remedies for Tenants Facing Insufficient Cure Periods and 1.4.2 Impact of Failing to Obtain an Injunction and Alternative Options.
Lack of Regulation
The use of a lease as a guarantee instrument for financing or investments is not regulated in the Dominican legislation.
Alternate Guarantee
However, when it comes to long-term leases (18 years or more) and when the property ownership right is registered before the Title Registry, it is possible to obtain the real estate registration of the lease as an accessory right to that of the property, issuing a title that accredits the same (certification of accessory in rem rights).
This type of instrument provides investors and financiers with certainty regarding the exclusivity of the right to use the property for a certain period of time, enforceable against everyone; that is, once the title is published in the Title Registry, no purchaser or creditor can claim not to know the terms and conditions of the lease, which are imposed on them.
This concept is very common in energy projects, which usually last from 20 to 25 years, since this registration of the right is used as part of the package of guarantees for financing and investments with foreign and local entities.
Note that the existence of a credit secured by a lease can only be known by third parties interested in the lease agreement, when it is disclosed by the debtor or guarantor.
Due to the particularities explained above, regarding revocation of a guarantee that has been granted, everything will depend on the terms and conditions of the guarantee contract. In principle, its revocation would result from an agreement between the signing parties or from a court order, and a unilateral revocation by the guarantor would not be possible, given that it is unlikely that the creditor would accept a clause in the contract that allows such action.
To recover on guarantees, the creditor may take legal action based on the contract, in the way mentioned above.
Non-Judicial
The non-judicial process allows for the voluntary delivery of the property by the debtor, which is formalised through a transactional agreement and payment in kind establishing the debt balance upon delivery of the property and authorising the transfer of the property, be it the one subject to the debt or a different property, in favour of the creditor.
Judicial
The judicial process is more expensive and time-consuming. Creditors resort to the real estate seizure process in the following ways:
1. Ordinary seizures: A document confirming the debt is necessary (ie, promissory note or court order) (article 673 et seq of the Code of Civil Procedure). The peculiarities of this process are as follows:
2. Foreclosures regulated by Law No. 6186 of 1963 (reserved for agricultural credit associations and mortgage secured loans):
3. Foreclosures regulated by Law No. 189-11 (reserved for banks and trust companies and mortgage secured loans):
If a property owner pledges their equity as a collateral, a lender can foreclose on that equity in case of default. However, when there are co-owners, it is unlikely for the creditor to physically materialise that foreclosure on the property since a plan approved by the Title Registry is required and the property must be divided. The creditor could reach an agreement with the co-owner; if not, they must petition the court for the partition of the property.
In practice, mortgage loans are only granted if all the owners agree to the guarantee.
In mortgage contracts in the Dominican Republic, it is common to include clauses that authorise the creditor to terminate the contract in the event of non-payment of an instalment or even a fraction thereof, without the need to grant additional terms to give the debtor a notice of default.
When a debtor fails to meet a payment obligation, the creditor generally grants the debtor an additional period that varies according to that financial entity’s policies.
This concession given by the creditor is not contemplated in the Dominican legislation; rather, it results from the creditor seeking to recover the credit in cash and not incur the legal expenses of execution usually associated with communicating through emails, text messages and phone calls and, as a last resort, demand for payment via a court bailiff.
In the Dominican Republic, the rights of redemption are not clearly stated but may be derived from the following:
Dominican Civil Code:
Code of Civil Procedure:
Law No. 6186:
Law No. 189-11:
When the property is acquired by a bidder at a public auction, nothing prevents the debtor from negotiating purchase from that bidder.
A creditor could pursue the co-owned property of his or her debtor but will be unable to execute the seizure due to the lack of a plan defining its size and location.
The creditor may pursue action against the debtor’s assets in multiple proceedings in the following ways:
Conventional Mortgage
The law does not allow the creditor to simultaneously execute other personal actions against the debtor, since the creditor’s actions are limited to the properties that were set up as collateral.
Right of Redemption
A debtor who is the subject of a seizure has the right to claim the return of the surplus of the value obtained, once the debt with the creditor has been settled (article 1235 Dominican Civil Code).
Non-Judicial
A non-judicial process may take two to four months including paying tax, registering the amicable agreement and issuing a title in favour of the creditor.
Judicial
The time frame of a judicial process is estimated as follows:
In a real estate seizure, the formula for calculating the debt is:
Capital + interest + legal fees and expenses = debt
If, after sale at a public auction, the securities received are insufficient to cover the debt, the creditor may apply the amount from the sale, first to legal fees and expenses, then to interest, and finally to the capital.
Both Law No. 6186 and the Dominican Civil Code grant the creditor the power to become an unsecured creditor, meaning the creditor has the ability to continue to pursue the debtor’s assets until the total collection of the debt, but no longer has the right of preference over other creditors.
The most common entities for joint ventures are:
A joint venture requires the collaboration of the partners on a specific project. Commonly, one partner may contribute with assets such as capital or land and another with know-how. Specific projects may include, for example, renewable energy projects, tourism projects, etc.
Persons with ownership interests in a real estate joint venture must act in accordance with the constitution, laws and regulations of the country and in good faith, prioritising the best interests of the joint venture.
Considering the real estate legal system, there are three types of mechanisms to seek remedy against owners who violate those duties:
Conflicts that relate to decision-making within the joint venture, when there is no amicable agreement for their solution, and provided that they do not affect the property rights of a property (limit them, restrict them, modify them or create burdens), are resolved in one of three ways:
Any conflict that is not resolved amicably and that involves the modification, limitation or creation of a burden on a real estate right will have to be resolved judicially before the courts of the real estate jurisdiction.
Automatic entry of judgment is not possible since court orders are preceded by a legal action initiated by a person before a court and its enforceability would not be immediate, except for referral and protection of constitutional rights, which are immediately enforceable.
Otherwise, court orders on non-urgent claims may only be executed when they are not subject to appeal and their suspension has not been ordered on the basis of an appeal in cassation, which is the last resort before the courts.
Provisional Measures
When applicable, provisional measures are available to preserve the rights associated with real estate, the most frequent being:
The methods of termination of the joint venture will be contained in a dissolution clause in the contract, be it by the will of the partners, or at the end of a set period, or in the event of poor business performance such as low returns on equity, failure to capture market share, etc.
In the event that a new company has been established to channel the operation of the joint venture, the company is dissolved as per the stipulations in the bylaws or in the partnership agreement. Once the company has been dissolved, the liquidation period will start, except in the case of a total merger or spin-off or any other form of global transfer of assets and liabilities.
The real estate guarantees are:
In unsecured loan contracts, creditors usually do not prohibit the debtor from making transactions with his or her assets. However, it is customary in practice that it constitutes a violation of the contract and the debtor loses the right to pay within the agreed term, and the creditor may demand the balance before its due date.
If the debtor engages in fraudulent conduct or bad faith acts aimed at becoming insolvent so that the creditor cannot pursue his or her assets, the debtor may be subject to civil, commercial or criminal actions, depending on the circumstances and the acts committed by the debtor.
Key Elements for Enforcing or Defending the Execution of Real Estate Guarantees
General Rules for Mortgages
Waivers of Defence
The Dominican Civil Code establishes that legally formed agreements have the force of law between the contracting parties (article 1134); however, the validity of the clauses on waiver of rights established in a contract will be subject to legal review, if these are contrary to the law in the sense that they violate a fundamental right or a public order rule.
In the Dominican Republic, real estate seizure governed by Law No. 189-11 is considered expedited compared to other seizures, and is reserved for banks and trust companies legally established in the Dominican Republic. Pursuant to Article 149, it only applies when the mortgage guarantee has been granted in a conventional manner. The creditor can only pursue the properties that were used as collateral through a mortgage loan contract.
Although it is an expedited process compared to others, it limits creditors by their type (banking and fiduciary sector) and does not allow the pursuit of other assets of a debtor who has already agreed to use one or more properties as a guarantee of payment.
Expedited Procedure
An expedited procedure is accepted by the courts when it is sought to end a manifestly illicit or harmful situation, and therefore the need for receivership is of an urgent nature.
The appointment of a receiver is made through an expedited procedure called “referral”, which is characterised by its speed due to the urgency of the request. The process is usually made in a maximum of two hearings, and the court issues its decision within a period of two months or less.
In principle, this type of action is introduced after a lawsuit has been initiated in court seeking the recognition or annihilation of some right, since this establishes before the referral court that there is a serious and formal claim or conflict which justifies the need for the judicial administrator.
Selection of a Receiver
Typically, the administration of a property involves the management of assets, whether from the operation of the business that exists there, rents, maintenance and other related matters; therefore, the judicial administrator that is commonly proposed is a certified public accountant.
The judicial administrator can be chosen in one of the following ways:
Associated Costs
Receivers are independent professionals who freely establish their fees and expenses to be charged for the service for which they are appointed by the court. The plaintiff is usually the one who must cover this cost as an interested party in safeguarding the asset of interest, but in some cases the costs are shared by both parties.
The use of receivers is common in the following disputes:
Likelihood of Appointment
This measure is invasive and therefore, when evaluating its importance, the courts will take into consideration whether or not it is more harmful to safeguard the property, and the businesses associated with it.
For example, a large company with a recognised presence in the market, where there appears to be no danger to its assets, is unlikely to have a receiver appointed by the court, unless the plaintiff can demonstrate a manifestly unlawful or harmful situation.
In inheritance conflicts, the probability of the appointment of a receiver with respect to real estate is high, because the law establishes very clear rules and principles regarding the rights of the heirs, which are equal and proportional to their interest, and therefore no one can benefit more than others, except for limited exceptions that are allowed by law.
In the Dominican Republic, there are two concepts similar to “bankruptcy”, limited to companies and traders:
Should there only be one real estate property, the admissibility is decided by a judge on a case-by-case basis.
Starting a restructuring process impacts the lender’s ability to foreclose or collect on a debt, as there is a suspensive effect until the conciliation and negotiation is concluded or is converted to a judicial liquidation (article 59 Law No. 141-15):
Suspension Exclusions
It should be noted that, pursuant to Law No. 141-15, the following actions and/or obligations are not suspended:
Resumption of Legal Actions
All actions aimed at collecting sums of money suspended by virtue of Article 54 will resume at the request of the creditor once the credit is determined or recognised, either by a conventional act or by a court decision and when the credit is verified and fixed by the restructuring plan.
The real estate jurisdiction has exclusive jurisdiction to resolve conflicts regarding the right of ownership or its accessories (article 3 Law No. 108-05, confirmed by the Supreme Court of Justice).
However, in matters of commercial or contractual disagreement involving a property, if the cause of the dispute has no relation to land ownership rights, then arbitration is appropriate.
See 6.1 Prevalence of Arbitration Clauses.
See 6.1 Prevalence of Arbitration Clauses.
The most frequent and efficient provisional measures are the following:
The registration of a provisional measure is made by request from the creditor, by court order or by an act signed by the debtor prior to failure to pay, as follows:
The inappropriate use of provisional measures is understood as the registration of liens based on documents that appear to be valid but in reality do not comply with the essential legal conditions for their validity, or when an abusive use of these has occurred.
The consequences of inappropriate use of provisional measures can be summarised as follows:
It should be noted that the current legislation establishes provisional measures that do not require a court authorisation, although those that do require a court authorisation are limited, namely provisional judicial mortgages, judicial administrations and seizures.
Courts usually accept requests for provisional measures, provided that they have sufficient legal basis, which includes the documentation that, according to the applicable regulations, is essential to accept this type of request.
Once the application is filed, the process until the court issues a decision usually takes between two and four months, or days in the case of seizures.
Everything relating to liability for damages is regulated by the Dominican Civil Code, since the real estate regulations do not include provisions or sanctions for reparable or non-reparable damages. Although there is the possibility of requesting that compensation for damages be considered reckless in a real estate lawsuit, the reality is that real estate courts do not usually accept these requests.
All damage must be repaired. The affected party has the possibility of going to the civil or commercial courts to claim compensation by demonstrating a direct link between the cause and the damage.
The concept of “mechanic’s liens” does not exist as such in real estate regulations, but instead any person who has a credit which the debtor in writing has accepted their commitment to pay, has the possibility of requesting and obtaining any of the charges (provisional measures) that have been described in 7.1 Types of Provisional Remedies in Real Estate Disputes.
In the Dominican Republic, the closest concept is that of real estate development trusts, specifically those for low-cost housing, which have the dual purpose of countering the housing shortage and making the mortgage market more flexible.
Real estate seizures affecting properties acquired under a trust are the responsibility of civil courts and are governed by Law No. 189-11. This law regulates the process of executing the guarantee in the event of non-compliance by the debtor, establishing simpler and faster procedures compared to the seizure process provided for in the Civil Procedure Code.
Law No. 189-11 allows the creditor to recover the debt within a relatively short period (approximately six months) through the proceeds of the sale of the property at a public auction or, if there are no interested parties, through the transfer of the property to his or her estate.
Claims seeking the termination or execution of a contract are filed before the Civil Court, which will analyse the content of the document to identify whether the terms and conditions governing the agreed transaction have been met.
If the content of the contract is ambiguous, the judge will have the task of interpreting the will of the parties at the time of formalising the agreement. Finally, by means of a ruling, the court will establish the result of its review, determining the consequences in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.
Public interest has a significant impact on research and strategies that involve real estate projects, as well as the consideration of foreign and national investment.
In the Dominican Republic, it is unlikely that the State will carry out expropriations on properties established in trusts for low-cost housing, and even more so if there are already buildings on those properties. Although property rights are a fundamental right, when a property must fulfil a social function that benefits the community, the public interest prevails over the private interest of the owner, which is the case in expropriation cases.
Generally, the State declares properties of public utility for agricultural and energy projects, expansion of public roads, construction of irrigation canals, and installation of antennas for energy transmission, among others. These projects are not usually located in urban areas, where low-cost housing trusts are commonly developed.
In recent years, the State has adopted the practice of acquiring from the owner only the amount of land on the property necessary for the work, instead of expropriating the entire property as used to happen.
Av. John F. Kennedy 64
Santo Domingo
10512
Dominican Republic
+1 809 566 7111
info@ulisescabrera.com www.ulisescabrera.com