Doing Business In.. 2024 Comparisons

Last Updated July 24, 2024

Contributed By Walder Wyss Ltd

Law and Practice

Authors



Walder Wyss Ltd is one of the most successful and fastest-growing Swiss commercial law firms and a full-service law firm with leading specialists across all legal fields, including corporate and commercial, employment, banking and finance, intellectual property and competition, healthcare and life sciences, insolvency, real estate, dispute resolution and tax law. Clients include national and international companies, publicly held corporations and family businesses, public law institutions and private clients. It is a dynamic law firm with flat management structures. The team of around 250 legal experts is augmented by approximately 100 employees working in support functions. Growth and a close relationship with clients are the factors that determine the firm’s success. With offices in Zurich, Geneva, Basel, Berne, Lausanne and Lugano, the firm provides clients with a seamless one-stop shop, and personalised and high-quality services in all language regions of Switzerland.

Switzerland has a civil law legal system. The most important source of law is written law. Switzerland’s federalist structure has three levels: 

  • the Confederation (the federal state); 
  • the cantons (the states); and
  • the municipalities (the local areas). 

The Federal Constitution ranks first in the order of priority. It allocates certain authorities to the Federal Confederation. Where an area is not allocated to the Federal Confederation, the cantons exercise sovereign rights. 

The different forms of written law generally have this order of priority: 

  • federal laws prevail over cantonal laws; 
  • constitutional rules prevail over ordinary statutes; and 
  • statutes enacted by a legislative body prevail over regulations prepared by a government or administrative body. 

The topic of foreign investment control is currently on the political agenda in Switzerland.

Unlike many neighbouring countries, Switzerland has no foreign investment control regime in place. No notification or clearance of a governmental agency is required when a foreign national or a foreign company invests in Switzerland or acquires a Swiss company. However, in specific sectors such as residential real estate, banking, insurance, national defence and electricity, sector-specific restrictions apply.

Depending on the outcome of current political initiatives, Switzerland might implement a limited foreign investment control regime in the foreseeable future. The administration published a piece of draft legislation at the end of 2023 focusing on state-owned investors active in particular critical sectors. There is still opposition to the draft legislation; the argument being that the cost/benefit ratio is unfavourable and the existing regulations are sufficient. It remains subject to the further political process whether and, if so, what foreign investment legislation will be introduced.

Switzerland is one of the world′s largest recipients of foreign investment. It is also one of the world′s largest investors abroad. Being open to inward foreign investment is important for Switzerland as a business centre. The country, therefore, aims to remain attractive for foreign investment even if a screening of foreign investment is introduced as a result of the current political initiatives.

For the time being, no general foreign investment control regime is in place. For current political initiatives, see above under 2.1 Approval of Foreign Investments. Only in specific regulated sectors do foreign investors need to obtain approvals. The steps vary depending on the process set forth for the regulated sector.

For the time being, no general foreign investment control regime is in place. For current political initiatives, see 2.1 Approval of Foreign Investments. In certain regulated sectors, the foreign investors need to undergo a screening regarding the source of funds.

Depending on the regulated sector, the legal process to challenge a decision by an authority may vary. As a general principle, decisions taken by an authority can be challenged in court.

In Switzerland, there are different ways to engage in commercial activities, either through structures that require capital investment or through personal commitment with associated liabilities. Accordingly, a variety of legal forms are available in Switzerland, including sole proprietorships, general partnerships, limited partnerships, corporations, LLCs, co-operatives and foundations. While Switzerland, as a member state of the Hague Trust Convention, recognises foreign trusts, trusts are not available under Swiss law, and comparable functions are served by foundations.

The most frequently used structures for the development of commercial activities are share corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs), both providing substantial flexibility and enabling the accommodation of a broad range of possible governance and operation setups.

Share corporations have a mandatory share capital of CHF100,000 split into shares of a nominal value that needs to be higher than zero, which can be issued to one or more shareholders. At incorporation, at least CHF50,000 portion of the share capital must be paid in cash or by contribution in kind of assets or rights.

LLCs have a mandatory quota capital of CHF20,000 split into quotas of a nominal value of CHF100 or more, which can be issued to one or more several quota holders. The entire quota capital must be paid in cash or by contribution in kind of assets or rights.

Shareholders of a share corporation are not disclosed in any publicly available register (except under the disclosure rules for listed companies). In contrast, the commercial register reflects the quota holders of all LLCs.

Typically, share corporations and LLCs are incorporated within two weeks, although it is possible to accelerate the process if necessary.

The incorporation requires the filing and registration in the competent commercial register of the canton of the seat of the following documents:

  • a public deed on the resolutions of the founders′ meeting;
  • articles of association;
  • proof that the share or quota capital has been paid in and/or proof that contributions in kind were made;
  • documentation on the appointment and the acceptance thereof of the board of directors/management and the auditors (if any);
  • legalised signature specimens for those directors and other representatives with signatory rights; and
  • documentation of the company’s domicile.

Corporate Actions

A number of corporate actions and changes need to be registered in the commercial register, including:

  • changes in the board/management;
  • changes of signatories;
  • in the case of an LLC, changes in the quota holder(s); and
  • changes to the articles of association, including changes to the company’s registered seat, capital, purpose, transfer restrictions, etc.

Reporting to the Equity Holders and Audit Requirements

The directors/management of a private company need to submit the company’s business report, consisting of (i) annual financial statements and, for larger entities, (ii) a management report and (iii) consolidated financial statements to the shareholders/quota holders for approval.

While the financial statements of private companies do not have to be filed in a public register or publicly disclosed, listing regulations require listed entities to publish their financials in line with international standards.

Whether an ordinary or a limited audit of the financial statements needs to be performed depends on a company’s size and economic relevance. Smaller companies can, with the unanimous consent of their shareholders/quota holders, waive the audit requirement altogether under certain conditions.

The financial statements of private companies are subject to an ordinary audit requirement in case, for two consecutive fiscal years, at least two of the following threshold values are exceeded:

  • CHF20 million for the balance-sheet total;
  • CHF40 million for revenue; and
  • 250 full-time employees.

A company must also undergo an ordinary audit if it must consolidate or if shareholders holding at least 10% of the company′s shares request an ordinary audit (opting up). An ordinary audit of the annual financial statements can also be required by the company’s articles of association or a resolution of a shareholders’ meeting.

If the above criteria are not met, a company’s financials are subject to a limited audit.

A company may limit the audit partially (opting down) or fully (opting out) with the shareholders’ unanimous consent if the company does not employ more than ten full-time employees.

Beneficial Owners

Companies are required to keep a register of the beneficial owners of the shares issued by them, and such beneficial owners must be disclosed to the company by the shareholders when the threshold of 25% (on a standalone basis as well as when acting in concert) of the share/quota capital or votes is reached, within one month following the relevant acquisition.

Tax Filings

Annual tax returns must be made on an annual basis, while various other taxes are subject to a variety of deadlines.

Share corporations and LLCs, in general, have three bodies, namely:

  • the shareholders’ meeting/quota holders’ meeting;
  • the board of directors/management; and
  • the auditor (subject to potential opting-out).

The shareholders’ meeting is the supreme authority of a share corporation, resolving the fundamental organisation of the company, electing the board of directors and taking a (limited) number of key decisions.

The board of directors is the executive body responsible for all matters not reserved for the general meeting, and shall manage the business of the company to the extent it has not delegated such management to individual members or the executive management.

The auditor is a controlling body, with the scope of its tasks depending on whether a limited or ordinary audit is to be conducted.

Despite corporate law thus generally providing for a one-tier model, in practice, the day-to-day management (except for certain reserved matters) is, in many cases, delegated to the executive management, effectively leading to a two-tier structure. Certain companies, including banks and insurance companies, are even legally required to establish such two-tier structure The following are non-transferable, inalienable duties that may not be delegated:

  • the overall management of the company and the issuing of all necessary directives;
  • determination of the company’s organisation;
  • the organisation of the accounting, financial control and financial planning systems as required for the management of the company;
  • the appointment and dismissal of persons entrusted with managing and representing the company;
  • overall supervision of the persons entrusted with managing the company, in particular with regard to compliance with the law, articles of association, operational regulations and directives;
  • compilation of the annual report, preparation for the general meeting and implementation of its resolutions;
  • filing an application for a debt restructuring moratorium and notification of the court in the event that the company is overindebted; and
  • in the case of companies whose shares are listed on a stock exchange, the preparation of the remuneration report.

In general, members of the board of directors and the executive management are personally responsible to the company, its shareholders and creditors for damages caused intentionally or negligently by default of their duties. The liability is, however, excluded if a task was properly delegated and if due care was given in selecting, instructing and supervising the person(s) put in charge of the relevant task. Under the business judgement rule, a business decision taken in a proper, unbiased and reasonably informed manner does not lead to liability, even if, in retrospect, it becomes clear that such decision was materially wrong and to the detriment of the company.

Liability actions can be brought by the company, its shareholders (either directly if they suffered direct damage or on behalf of the company in case of indirect damages such as by a diminished share value) and, in the event of its bankruptcy only, the company’s creditors. However, formal actions against board members are not common in practice.

Once shareholders have fully paid in their shares, they are not personally liable for the company′s obligations. Under the “piercing of the corporate veil” concept, shareholders can, in exceptional cases, be held liable if the legal separation between the shareholder and the company has been disregarded and it would be abusive to rely on the legal independence of the company.

Nature and Hierarchy of the Legal Rules Governing Employment Relationships

There are various legal sources which may be of relevance when it comes to determining the mutual rights and obligations in connection with a particular employment relationship. These are typically the following (listed in hierarchical order):

  • mandatory statutory law (including pertinent case law);
  • mandatory standard employment contracts, ie, a special kind of legislative decree (as the case may be); 
  • collective bargaining agreements (as the case may be);
  • operating regulations (as the case may be);
  • employment contract;
  • regulations of the employer (if any);
  • non-mandatory standard employment contracts (as the case may be);
  • non-mandatory statutory law (including pertinent case law);
  • instructions of the employer (if any); and
  • judge-made law based on the hypothetical will of reasonable contracting parties (in the absence of any other applicable legal source).

Principle of Freedom of Form

Principle

Swiss employment law is governed by the principle of freedom of form, meaning that there are, as a matter of principle, no formal requirements for the conclusion of an employment contract. Therefore, the conclusion of an employment contract generally only requires explicitly or impliedly communicated corresponding declarations of intent pursuant to which:

  • the employee undertakes to work in the service of the employer for a limited or unlimited period; and
  • the employer undertakes to pay a remuneration to the employee.

For the purpose of proof alone, however, it is always advisable to conclude an employment contract in writing.

Exceptions

There are also exceptions to the before-mentioned principle of freedom of form. Firstly, there are specific employment contracts whose conclusion requires the observation of the written form (eg, apprenticeship contracts). Secondly, there are a number of specific contractual provisions in any employment contract that may only be bindingly agreed upon in writing (eg, post-contractual non-compete restrictions).

Duration of Employment Contracts

Permanent versus fixed-term employment contracts

Swiss employment law provides for two basic types of employment contracts, ie, permanent and fixed-term employment contracts:

  • permanent employment contracts are entered into for an indefinite period, and their termination requires a notice of termination (which may, in the sense of temporal protection against terminations, not be given at an inopportune juncture); and
  • fixed-term employment contracts simply cease at the end of their fixed term and do not, at least as a matter of principle, provide for a premature ordinary termination option (although this is a possibility the parties may agree on).

Prohibition of “illegal chain employment contracts”

In order to guarantee a minimum of temporal protection against terminations for the benefit of the employee, case law has developed the rule that it is not possible to agree on multiple consecutive fixed-term employment contracts without an objective reason for preferring this to a permanent employment contract. In the absence of such an objective reason, the seemingly fixed-term employment contracts are, therefore, simply reinterpreted into one permanent employment contract.

Maximum Duration of Employment Contracts

After ten years, any fixed-term employment contract concluded for a longer duration (which is extremely unusual) may be terminated by either party by giving six months’ notice expiring at the end of a month.

No Minimum Working Time for Salaried Employees

Swiss law does not provide for minimum working times. As a matter of principle, it is up to the parties to agree on a salaried employee′s workload.

Maximum Working Time for Some Salaried Employees

Maximum weekly and daily working time for a large group of salaried employees

At least for a large group of employees employed in Switzerland, the Federal Act on Work in Industry, Trade and Commerce (the “Labour Act”) provides for weekly and daily maximum working times. These maximum working times pursuant to the Labour Act particularly, but not exhaustively, apply to most so-called “blue-collar workers” but explicitly not to employees holding a higher executive position, employees performing a scientific activity and employees performing an autonomous artistic activity (to name a few of the exceptions).

Maximum weekly working time for salaried employees who are subject to the Labour Act

With regard to employees who are subject to the Labour Act, the maximum weekly working time is generally either 45 hours (roughly simplified: for employees performing predominantly intellectual work in offices or office-like jobs) or 50 hours (roughly simplified: for employees with a predominantly manual field of activity). These limits may still be exceeded in exceptional cases, however.

Maximum daily working time for salaried employees who are subject to the Labour Act

With regard to employees who are subject to the Labour Act, there is also a general maximum daily working time of 12.5 or 13 hours (depending on the calculation method) to be observed. This follows (indirectly) from the Labour Act’s various provisions regarding minimum rest periods (such as mandatory minimum breaks and the general prohibition of work during the night and on Sundays/public holidays).

Overtime and Extra Hours

Distinction between overtime and extra hours

There are (respectively, may be) two main categories of hours worked in excess of the applicable usual weekly working time that need to be distinguished:

  • “overtime” means the hours that an employee works in excess of the (usual) weekly working time that has been contractually agreed, is customary or has been defined in an applicable collective bargaining agreement or standard employment contract; and
  • “extra hours” means the hours that an employee works in excess of the applicable maximum weekly working time (if any).

In the context of variable working time systems (eg, flexitime systems), there may be an additional important category of hours worked in excess of the applicable usual weekly working time (ie, hours worked based on the employee’s “time sovereignty” which are to be distinguished from overtime).

Employee’s duty to perform overtime and extra hours

While the employee is obliged to perform overtime if such overtime is required and to the extent they are able and may reasonably be expected to do so, the performance of extra hours (additionally) requires the existence of exceptional circumstances.

Compensation for overtime and extra hours

Pursuant to statutory law, overtime and extra hours are principally compensated by corresponding time off (only if the employee consents) or by an additional salary payment including a 25% surcharge (if the employee does not consent to compensation by time off).

However, this statutory compensation rule is only mandatory with regard to extra hours (for some employees, only from the 60th extra hour per calendar year). With regard to mere overtime, any employee’s compensation claim (ie, both a compensation in cash or in kind) may be excluded by a parties’ agreement observing the written form or by a respective provision in a collective bargaining agreement or standard employment contract.

Freedom of Termination

Principle

Ordinary terminations of employment (ie, terminations observing the applicable notice period) do not require a particular lawful reason, so Switzerland may be described as an “employment at will” jurisdiction. If the other party so requests, the party giving notice must state its respective reasons for termination in writing.

Limitations to the principle

However, there are important limitations to the before-mentioned principle of freedom of termination, as set out below.

  • Terminations must principally observe the applicable notice period (during which the employer remains obliged to pay the employee’s compensation).
  • Terminations may never be issued in bad faith (so-called abusive terminations), whereas such bad faith is specified in a non-exhaustive legislative enumeration of circumstances (eg, bad faith is assumed if a termination is the result of the other party asserting claims under the employment relationship in good faith) – while even an abusive termination is valid, it entitles the terminated party to a penalty payment of up to six monthly salaries (provided that said party submits a written objection against the termination before the expiry of the notice period and brings the claim before the competent court within 180 days of the end of the employment relationship).
  • Terminations with immediate effect (ie, without observing the applicable notice period or an agreed fixed term) require the existence of good cause. This is only very exceptionally assumed if the terminating party may not reasonably be expected to continue the employment until the expiry of the applicable notice period or the agreed fixed term and acts within just a few days of becoming aware of the respective good cause – while even respective terminations without good cause result in an immediate termination of the employment, the (non-)existence of good cause determines the further legal consequences of a termination with immediate effect, such as an additional penalty payment of up to six monthly salaries (in the case of an employer’s termination without good cause).

While statutory law does not provide for severance payments, this may, in particular, be provided for in employment contracts or collective bargaining agreements (subject to the respective prohibition for members of the board of directors, the executive board and the advisory board, and persons close to them, of Swiss stock corporations whose shares are listed on a stock exchange).

Termination Agreements

As a matter of principle, the parties may agree on a mutual termination of their employment relationship in a termination agreement. This, however, requires that such a termination agreement is not concluded to circumvent statutory provisions protecting the employee’s interests (such as mandatory provisions in connection with incapacity for work due to illness or accident) but rather constitutes an actual “settlement”. It is against this background that respective termination agreements usually provide for an additional “voluntary” severance payment that shall compensate the employee for a fixation of an exact termination date (respectively, the exclusion of any statutory prolongation of the employment in connection with an employee’s incapacity for work) and/or which shall compensate the employee for a waiver of his or her potential claim to an additional penalty payment in view of an abusive termination. Non-compliance with the “actual settlement” requirement leads to the entire termination agreement being declared null and void.

Collective Redundancies

Procedural rules to be followed

The termination of a certain minimum number of employees (in any case at the very least ten employees) within 30 days and for reasons not pertaining personally to the affected employees (ie, collective redundancies) is subject to specific procedural requirements. Most importantly:

  • an employer may not decide to carry out collective redundancies before having informed the works council or (in the absence of such a works council) the employees in writing (including a copy sent to the cantonal employment office) and having consulted with them;
  • in connection with such consultation, the employer must at least provide the works council or the employees the opportunity to formulate (non-binding) proposals on how to avoid redundancies, limit their number and/or mitigate their consequences within a set deadline of (in standard cases) approximately two weeks (otherwise, any respective termination would qualify as abusive and entitle each affected employee to a penalty claim of up to two monthly salaries);
  • the employer must notify the cantonal employment office about the results of the consultation and provide it with further appropriate information in writing (including a copy sent to the works council or the employees); and
  • no individual employment relationship eventually terminated in the course of collective redundancies may end until at least 30 days after such notification of the cantonal employment office.

Employer’s duty to issue a social plan

Only employers normally employing at least 250 employees and intending to make at least 30 employees redundant within 30 days for reasons not pertaining personally to the affected employees are obliged to negotiate a social plan (ie, an agreement setting out measures to avoid redundancies, to reduce their number and to mitigate their consequences) with the works council or (in the absence of such a works council) the employees. If the employer fails to reach a respective agreement with the works council or the employees, the social plan will be issued by an arbitral tribunal.

Optional Constitution of a Works Council

According to the Federal Participation Act, employees of a Swiss employer with a headcount of at least 50 are entitled (but not obliged) to constitute a works council. At the request of 20% of the employees (or at the request of 100 employees of an employer with a headcount of more than 500), an anonymous vote must be held to determine whether the majority of the employees casting a vote are in favour of the suggested constitution of a works council.

Participation Rights

Also, according to the Federal Participation Act, the management must provide the works council with all the information necessary to carry out its tasks properly (at least once a year). In addition, the works council has special participation rights (such as specific information rights, consultation rights or even a right of co-decision) in connection with questions relating to occupational safety and employee protection, transfers of undertakings, collective redundancies and selected topics in connection with occupational pension funds. In the absence of a works council, the employees may exercise their respective rights individually.

Far-Reaching Consequences of a Violation of Participation Rights

The potential consequences of a violation of the before-mentioned participation rights are not uniform but may, depending on the pertinent subject, be quite far-reaching (eg, pursuant to case law, the termination of an affiliation contract with an occupational pension fund without the necessary consent of the works council/employees must be considered null and void).

Taxes Applicable to Employees

Income tax

Income tax is levied at federal, cantonal and municipal levels on:

  • the worldwide income from all sources in case of a tax resident employee (so-called “unlimited taxation‟); or
  • income earned in Switzerland in case of a non-tax resident employee (“limited taxation‟).

Individuals are considered tax resident if they are:

  • Swiss resident (ie, the centre of vital interests is in Switzerland);
  • involved in a gainful occupation and staying at least 30 consecutive days in Switzerland; or
  • staying at least 90 consecutive days in Switzerland (irrespective of any gainful occupation).

Exempt from unlimited taxation is income from enterprises and permanent establishments outside of Switzerland. Further exemptions from income tax may apply, eg, with regard to certain types of income (such as income from inheritance, gifts and matrimonial property rights, which may however be subject to gift or inheritance taxes), capital gains from disposal of privately held movable assets (eg, shares; such movable assets are in principle exempt unless the taxpayer is deemed a professional dealer) and gains from immovable assets (ie, real estate) located in Switzerland.

Swiss income tax rates are progressive, with the marginal income tax rates varying between approximately 22% and 41%. Reduced taxation applies for certain non-occupational income (such as dividend income in case of qualified participation of at least 10% of the nominal share capital). The applicable tax rates are determined based on the worldwide income, irrespective of whether unlimited or limited taxation applies.

Swiss domestic tax law and the above principles on Swiss income tax may be overruled if, in an international context, a double taxation treaty (DTT) applies. DTTs have been concluded by Switzerland with over 100 countries.

Wealth tax

Levied on a cantonal and municipal level only, the distinction between unlimited and limited taxation also applies.

In case of unlimited taxation, wealth tax will be levied on the worldwide wealth, excluding assets attributable to business operations, permanent establishments or real estate outside of Switzerland (these assets are, however, considered for determining the applicable tax rate). Wealth tax rates vary significantly depending on the canton and municipality of residence, with top marginal wealth tax rates varying between approximately 0.1% and 1.0% above a certain threshold, which is usually tax-free.

Social security contributions

Levied on the gross income, the “state pension‟ covers old-age and survivors’ insurance, disability insurance, and loss of earnings compensation in case of (military or similar) service and maternity. Social security contributions are split 50:50 between employee and employer, with the employee’s portion amounting to 5.3% of the gross salary and being deducted and directly paid by the employer.

Occupational pension contributions

Contributions to the occupational pension scheme(s), to be established or acceded to by the employer for its employees, are determined by the specific pension scheme based on individual factors (such as age and insured salary) and are usually split 50:50 between employee and employer (the employee′s portion may in any case not exceed 50% of the total contributions).

Employees earning above a certain annual threshold (from 2023: CHF22,050) are mandatorily required to join the employer′s pension scheme. Mandatory pension schemes are limited to a maximum annual salary (from 2023: CHF88,200), above which the employer may establish or accede to a voluntary pension scheme.

Unemployment insurance contributions

Providing certain compensation for a limited period in case of unemployment, weather-induced loss of working hours, short-time work, and non-payment in case of the employer′s insolvency, the contributions amount to 2.2% of the gross salary not exceeding CHF148,200, and 1% of the gross salary exceeding the said amount, and are split 50:50 between employer and employee.

Non-occupational accident insurance contributions

Employees working at least eight hours per week are mandatorily insured against non-occupational accidents. The contributions depend on the individual insurance contract and are usually borne entirely by the employee, and deducted and directly paid by the employer.

Daily sickness benefits insurance contributions

For a limited period, the employer is obligated to continue paying the salary if an employee is prevented from working due to illness. The employer may take out insurance to cover this risk and agree with the employee to bear up to 50% of the contributions, subject to the individual insurance contract.

Social health insurance premiums

Though mandatory for all Swiss residents, social health insurance is a private matter of each employee, not related to the employment relationship. The employer is not obligated to contribute, nor is it customary that the employer contributes, to its employees′ social health insurance premiums.

Taxes Applicable to Employer

With regard to general taxation, please see 5.2 Taxes Applicable to Businesses. In addition, from the salary of employees who are:

  • non-tax residents (in Switzerland); or
  • neither Swiss citizens nor holders of a permanent residency permit nor married to a Swiss citizen,

a wage source tax in the amount of the income tax owed is levied and withheld by the employer.

Social security contributions

The employer′s portion of 5.3% is to be paid directly by the employer in addition to the gross salary (from which the employee′s portion of an additional 5.3% is deducted and directly paid by the employer).

Occupational pension contributions

See above, as for employees; usually split 50:50, at least 50% are to be borne by the employer.

Unemployment insurance contributions

See above, as for employees; usually split 50:50, at least 50% are to be borne by the employer.

Occupational and non-occupational accident insurance contributions

Occupational accident insurance is mandatory for all employees working in Switzerland and must be borne by the employer. Contributions depend on the individual insurance contract. With regard to non-occupational accident insurance, see above, as for employees.

Daily sickness benefits insurance contributions

See above, as for employees; usually split 50:50, at least 50% are to be borne by the employer.

Family allowance contributions

Family allowances (child and education allowances as well as birth and adoption allowances) are paid by the employer to entitled employees, for which the employer is reimbursed by the competent compensation office. Family allowance contributions are mainly borne by the employer based on a percentage of the salary and depend on the canton and the individual insurance contract (usually between 0.7% and 3.5% of the annual gross salary).

Corporate Income Tax

As for individuals, corporate income tax is levied on federal, cantonal and municipal levels:

  • on the worldwide net income from all sources in Switzerland in case of a tax resident legal entity, including companies, co-operatives, associations and foundations (so-called “unlimited taxation‟); or
  • on net income earned in Switzerland in case of a non-tax resident legal entity (“limited taxation‟).

A legal entity is considered a tax resident if (i) its statutory seat or (ii) its place of effective management is located in Switzerland.

Exempt from unlimited (corporate) taxation is income from enterprises and permanent establishments or real estate outside of Switzerland. Effective corporate income tax rates depend on the canton and the municipality and vary from approximately 12% to 22%.

Tax losses may be carried forward and offset against income for the following seven years.

Dividends and capital gains are subject to a participation relief in case of participation of at least 10% of the nominal share capital or a fair market value of the participation of at least CHF1 million. In the case of such qualified participations, the corporate income tax will be reduced by the ratio between the net income from the participation and the aggregate taxable income of the legal entity concerned.

Further deductions may be available, such as IP Box, R&D Super Deduction or Notional Interest Deduction.

Capital Tax

Tax resident and non-tax resident legal entities in Switzerland are subject to an annual capital tax on the cantonal and municipal levels. Levied on the tax-adjusted net equity, the applicable tax rates range between approximately 0.001% and 0.53%. The capital tax is creditable to the corporate income tax in some cantons.

Stamp Duty

A one-time capital duty of 1% is levied on any issuance of new shares by a tax resident company exceeding the amount of CHF1 million (nominal value and share premium, any issuance up to such amount being tax-free) and on contributions made to such company. In both cases, certain reliefs are available for, inter alia, recapitalisation, restructuring and migration.

A security transfer tax of 0.15% for Swiss securities and 0.3% for foreign securities applies to any transfer of taxable securities:

  • which are transferred against consideration;
  • where at least one of the parties involved in the transfer qualifies as a Swiss securities dealer; and
  • where none of the available exemptions applies.

Stamp duty is further levied in certain special legal cases (eg, on insurance premiums).

Value Added Tax (VAT)

VAT is levied at a federal level on taxable supplies and services made in Switzerland as well as on the import of goods. Taxable services from abroad are subject to the reverse charge mechanism.

The standard tax rate is 8.1%. A special tax rate of 3.8% applies to accommodation services (eg, hotels), and a reduced tax rate of 2.6% applies to the charge (and import) of certain elementary supplies such as food, water and medication.

Individuals and legal entities providing taxable supplies and services are subject to VAT if such supplies and services exceed CHF100,000 per annum (in certain special cases such as sports associations, the threshold amount is CHF150,000).

Withholding Tax (WHT)

Dividends in cash or in kind from a tax resident company are subject to WHT at a rate of 35%, to be withheld by the company and paid to the Swiss Federal Tax Authorities. The WHT is refundable or creditable in full to any shareholder having recognised the distribution in the income statement or reported it in the income tax return or based on a DTT or, under certain circumstances, the agreement with the EU regarding international automatic exchange of information. A notification procedure is available (instead of paying the tax and claiming the refund) under certain conditions.

Interest payments of tax resident legal entities are subject to WHT if:

  • made for customer deposits with Swiss banks; or
  • based on a collective debt fundraising (ie, debt raised from more than ten creditors at identical conditions or 20 creditors at deviating conditions, and the aggregate debt concerned amounts to at least CHF500,000).

Royalties paid by tax resident legal entities are not subject to WHT as long as they meet at arm′s length terms.

OECD/G20 Minimum Tax Rate

The second pillar of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development′s (OECD) Two Pillar solution has been implemented in Switzerland following approval of a constitutional amendment by a popular vote on 18 June 2023. On 22 December 2023, the Swiss Federal Council enacted a temporary ordinance with effect on 1 January 2024, implementing a minimum tax rate (Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax, QDMTT) of 15% for large multinational companies with an annual turnover of at least EUR750 million by means of a supplementary tax. The Federal Council must submit a draft law to Parliament to replace the ordinance within six years of the ordinance coming into force. The Federal Council has further decided to initially refrain from applying the international supplementary tax rules Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) and Undertaxed Payments Rule (UTPR).

Further tax credits and incentives – such as IP Box, R&D Super Deduction or Notional Interest Deduction – may be available; however, this depends on the cantonal implementation (if any) and is therefore subject to the tax domicile.

Tax consolidation is available for VAT purposes. Legal entities, including permanent establishments, under common control, may form a VAT group, by which intra-group supplies are excluded from VAT.

The minimum equity of a tax resident company is calculated on the asset base, ie, the maximum indebtedness permissible for tax purposes for each category of assets, such permissible maximum indebtedness ranging between 0% and 100%. A company is considered thinly capitalised if the aggregate debt owed to related parties exceeds the calculated permissible maximum indebtedness.

Such a qualification has the effect that:

  • related party debt exceeding the calculated permissible maximum indebtedness will be deemed hidden equity for capital tax purposes (ie, increasing the basis of the capital tax); and
  • interest payments on such excess related party debt will be deemed a (hidden) dividend, resulting in respective taxes being applicable, in particular a 35% WHT.

As a principle, Switzerland has no statutory transfer pricing rules other than the requirement that intercompany charges are on arm′s length terms. Therefore, Swiss tax authorities accept, in principle, the transfer pricing methods described by the OECD guidelines.

Special rules apply with regard to interest rates on loans granted from or to shareholders and other related parties. The Swiss Federal Tax Authorities publish, on an annual basis, safe-haven interest rates applicable for the following year. Higher or lower interest rates may be applied if it can be proved that they are on arm′s length terms.

Swiss law does not provide for specific anti-evasion rules. Based on Swiss law and decisions by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court, the following two rules have been developed.

  • Legal entities are taxable at the registered seat or the place of effective management.
  • Arrangements may be disregarded if:
    1. the taxpayer’s legal form appears unusual or unsuitable for its economic goal;
    2. the legal form appears to have been chosen arbitrarily and only to achieve tax savings; and
    3. the legal form leads to tax savings.

Mergers and acquisitions must be notified if certain turnover thresholds are reached. Planned concentrations of undertakings such as mergers, acquisitions of sole or joint control over a previously independent undertaking as well as the setting up of full-function joint ventures (Concentrations) must be notified to the Competition Commission (COMCO) before their implementation if the following turnover thresholds are reached in the financial year preceding the Concentration:

  • the undertakings concerned together reported a turnover of at least CHF2 billion, or a turnover in Switzerland of at least CHF500 million; and
  • at least two of the undertakings concerned each reported a turnover in Switzerland of at least CHF100 million.

Regardless of whether the turnover thresholds above are reached, a Concentration must be notified in any case if one of the undertakings concerned has been held (in a binding decision) to be dominant in a market in Switzerland and the Concentration concerns either the same market or an adjacent, upstream or downstream market.

The merger control procedure can include two phases: COMCO has one month for a preliminary assessment of a notified transaction (Phase I). Then, the Concentration may be implemented, unless COMCO opens a Phase II investigation. The Phase II investigation must be completed within an additional four months. Before Phase I and, if relevant, Phase II is completed, Concentrations must not be implemented.

COMCO assesses whether the notified Concentration leads to the creation or strengthening of a dominant market position likely to eliminate effective competition. The threshold for intervention seems comparatively rather high. COMCO also can clear Concentrations under certain conditions and obligations only.

Agreements that significantly restrict competition in a market for specific goods or services and are not justified on the grounds of economic efficiency, and all agreements that eliminate effective competition, are unlawful.

Agreements and concerted practices between competitors (Horizontal Agreements) on prices or price elements (such as rebates), quantities or the allocation of territories or customers are presumed to eliminate effective competition (so-called hardcore restrictions). Such hardcore restrictions can hardly ever be justified on economic efficiency grounds.

Agreements between undertakings at different levels of the production and distribution chain (Vertical Agreements) regarding fixed or minimum prices are presumed to eliminate effective competition and thus qualify as hardcore restrictions, irrespective of whether the agreement has actual effects on the relevant market. The same is true for agreements on absolute territorial protection. Absolute territorial protection clauses prohibit passive sales, ie, prohibit the fulfilment of unsolicited customer orders.

Dominant undertakings and undertakings with relative market power behave unlawfully if, by abusing their position in the market, they hinder other undertakings from starting or continuing to compete (eg, by pricing below cost) or disadvantage trading partners (eg, by imposing excessive prices or unfair trading terms).

Undertakings are considered dominant in a specific market if they are able, as suppliers or consumers, to behave to an appreciable extent independently of the other participants (competitors, suppliers or consumers) in the market. A dominant position is generally presumed for a company with a market share of 50% or more. However, under certain circumstances, a lower market share of approximately 40% is sufficient to qualify as a dominant market position.

An undertaking has relative market power if other undertakings are dependent on it for the supply of or the demand for goods or services in such a way that there are no adequate and reasonable opportunities for switching to other undertakings.

The Swiss Cartel Act lists certain behaviours of dominant undertakings and undertakings with relative market power which are considered unlawful (non-exclusive):

  • any refusal to deal (eg, refusal to supply or to purchase goods);
  • any discrimination between trading partners in relation to prices or other conditions of trade;
  • any imposition of unfair prices or other unfair conditions of trade;
  • any undercutting of prices or other conditions directed against a specific competitor;
  • any limitation of production, supply or technical development;
  • any conclusion of contracts on the condition that the other contracting party agrees to accept or deliver additional goods or services; and
  • the restriction of the opportunity for buyers to purchase goods or services offered both in Switzerland and abroad at the market prices and conditions customary in the industry in the foreign country concerned.

The abuse of a dominant market position by a dominant company (but not the abuse of relative market power) is subject to a fine of up to 10% of the turnover of such company in Switzerland in the preceding three financial years.

Definition

An invention or process can be patented if it is:

  • new and does not form part of the state of the art, ie, all knowledge that has been made publicly available anywhere in the world prior to the patent application;
  • inventive, which means that it must not be obvious to a person skilled in the art; and
  • industrially applicable and practicable, and it is possible to replicate its implementation.

Neither the novelty nor the inventive aspect are examined prior to the grant of a Swiss patent but can be disputed by third parties in court proceedings challenging the patent.

The following cannot be patented:

  • abstract ideas without specific technical solutions, discoveries of natural processes or phenomena, scientific theories and mathematical methods;
  • game rules and teaching methods;
  • diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical procedures used on humans or animals;
  • plant sorts, animal breeds, and other biological procedures for breeding plants or animals (however, biotechnological inventions – such as the extraction of human insulin from yeast cells – can be patented); and
  • inventions whose use would be contrary to public policy, explicitly forbidden or immoral.

Application

Swiss patent applications must be filed with the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property.

The following need to be submitted over the course of the filing process:

  • information on the applicant;
  • description of the invention;
  • at least one patent claim to define the invention;
  • technical drawings of reproducible quality;
  • declaration regarding international priority rights claimed (if any); and
  • names of the individual inventors.

Enforcement and Remedies

Any valid patent can be challenged before the Swiss Federal Patent Court. Patents (or parts thereof) can be cancelled if:

  • the invention was not new or innovative at the time of filing; or
  • the invention is not described sufficiently clearly and precisely for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art. This is referred to as insufficient disclosure. The plaintiff can also argue that important elements or steps relating to the invention are not mentioned or obvious in the patent specification.

Patent infringements can be prosecuted through both civil actions and criminal proceedings.

Length of Protection

Patents are protected for 20 years from the date of filing. This period is generally not extendable. However, for certain products (eg, medicinal products) a supplementary protection certificate may be requested that extends patent protection for up to five years.

Definition

A trade mark is a protected sign that distinguishes a company′s products or services from those of other companies.

The following categories of trade marks are available:

  • individual trade marks, being the most common category, typically used by companies to identify and market their products and services;
  • collective trade marks, used for the identification and marketing of products and services by associations and their members;
  • guarantee trade marks, guaranteeing that goods and services possess specific characteristics (eg, regarding the quality or geographical origin); and
  • geographical trade marks, requiring the existence of a prior registration, a foreign (controlled) designation of origin recognised by Switzerland, a geographical indication, the existence of a Federal Council ordinance or an equivalent foreign regulation.

The following types of trade marks are available:

  • word marks;
  • figurative marks (optionally with a colour claim); and
  • combined word and figurative marks (optionally with a colour claim).

The trade mark owner has the exclusive but transferable and licensable right to use the trade mark for goods or services for which it is registered and can prohibit third parties from using it.

Application

Swiss trade mark applications must be filed with the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property.

Enforcement and Remedies

Any trade mark can be challenged by means of an opposition if it could be confused with one or more other trade marks. The objection must be filed with the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property within three months upon registration of the trade mark. Trade marks can be challenged at any time after the expiration of the objection period before ordinary civil courts.

Trade mark infringements can be prosecuted through both civil actions and criminal proceedings.

The cancellation of a trade mark can be requested after a non-interrupted period of non-use of five years; it should be noted that the use of a trade mark either by the trade mark owner or by a third party with the consent of the trade mark owner is sufficient to prevent successful cancellation requests.

Length of Protection

Trade marks are protected for an initial period of ten years from the date of filing and can be renewed for an unlimited number of additional ten-year periods.

Definition

The design of products or parts of products is characterised in particular by the arrangement of lines, surfaces, contours or colours or by the materials used.

Designs can be protected if they are:

  • new (ie, they have not been made publicly available prior to the date of application or priority); and
  • sufficiently distinctive from existing designs in key features,

and are not:

  • otherwise unlawful;
  • contrary to public policy, explicitly forbidden or immoral; or
  • only comprised of features dictated solely by the technical function of the product.

The owner of a design has the exclusive right to its use and can prevent third parties from using it for commercial purposes. Protection covers the external appearance and visual impression of a product. The production, utility, intended use and technical effects of a design are not protected.

Animated creations are not covered by design protection in Switzerland.

Application

Swiss design applications are to be filed with the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property. Publication can be deferred for up to 30 months.

Enforcement and Remedies

Design infringements can be prosecuted through both civil actions and criminal proceedings.

Length of Protection

Designs are protected for an initial period of five years from the date of filing and can be renewed for additional five years for a duration of up to 25 years.

Definition

Intellectual creations (including visual and audio-visual works, music, works of architecture, computer software and scientific works) with an individual character are copyright-protected works. Software is an explicitly recognised work category. Further, photographs are protected even if they do not have an individual character.

Copyright does not protect, for example, ideas, achievements, products of nature or coincidence, concepts or instructions, laws and regulations. Patent specifications and published patent applications are not protected.

The copyright owner has the exclusive right to determine how and when the copyright-protected work is used. This includes:

  • the right to reproduce;
  • the right to distribute;
  • the right to make a work available to the public;
  • the right to perform and present; and
  • the right to adapt.

Protection

Protection arises automatically upon the creation of the work, with no registration required. Under Swiss law, it is not necessary to add “©‟ or “Copyright‟ for protection to apply.

As there is no register for copyrights, in case of a dispute the copyright owner needs to demonstrate authorship or having been assigned (by operation of law or contractually) ownership. Aside from other means of proof (witnesses, drafts, etc), the Swiss Copyright Act provides for a presumption of authorship, meaning that, unless proven otherwise, the author is deemed to be the person whose name or pseudonym appears on the copies of the work published.

Enforcement and Remedies

Copyright infringements can be prosecuted through both civil actions and criminal proceedings. Remuneration claims for certain types of works are only enforceable by societies for the collective management of copyrights.

Length of Protection

Protection lasts for the life of the author, plus:

  • 50 years for computer software and photographs; and
  • 70 years for all other copyrights.

Switzerland does not have an act dealing specifically with trade secrets. Instead, trade secrets are protected under various provisions as set out below.

  • Criminal law sanctions persons legally committed to keeping a secret from exploiting or revealing it. It further prohibits industrial espionage. Furthermore, a number of secrecy obligations are enforced with criminal sanctions in various industrial sectors and professions, such as the secrecy obligations applicable to lawyers, physicians, banking, etc.
  • Under Swiss competition law, unfair business practices regarding the unlawful procurement, misappropriation or exploitation of information are prohibited. A violation of these rules may lead to civil liability and criminal sanctions.
  • Corporate law prohibits the bodies and top management of companies from disclosing or otherwise utilising secret information other than for the scope of their mandates.
  • Employment law prohibits an employee from exploiting confidential information acquired in the course of work.
  • Agency and procurement law forbids an agent from making use of the principal’s trade secrets it has been entrusted with.

Furthermore, Switzerland is a party to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).

Data protection in Switzerland is mainly regulated by the Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP) and its ordinances, particularly the Federal Ordinance on Protection Act. However, sector-specific or overarching data protection legislation may provide for a broader scope of application. The new FADP that entered into force on 1 September 2023 aligned Swiss data protection to a significant extent to the European legislation and has, amongst others, implemented:

  • the principle of data protection by design and by default;
  • the obligation to perform an impact assessment under certain circumstances; and
  • the obligation to notify the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (FDPIC) or data subjects of data breaches unless an exception applies.

Given that Switzerland is not a member state of the EU, the EU General Data Protection Regulation only applies under certain circumstances, eg, if a Swiss-based company offers goods or services to individuals in the EU or monitors the behaviour of such individuals.

The FADP is applicable to the processing of personal data that has an effect in Switzerland, even if they occurred abroad. Therefore, if personal data concerning natural persons in Switzerland is processed abroad, the controller or processor abroad must comply with applicable Swiss law. In addition, private controllers domiciled or resident abroad must appoint a representative in Switzerland if they process personal data of persons in Switzerland.

The FADP establishes certain principles, which must be observed by controllers and – for most principles – also processors.

  • Lawfulness ‒ personal data must be processed lawfully, meaning that processing must not violate another norm of Swiss law directly or indirectly aiming at protecting the personality.
  • Good faith ‒ data shall be processed in good faith, meaning that the processing shall be evident to the data subject.
  • Transparency and purpose limitation ‒ the collection of personal data and its usage must be apparent to the data subject, and use shall be limited to the specified purpose.
  • Proportionality ‒ processing must be proportionate to the purpose (data minimisation) and must be “destroyed or anonymised” as soon as it is no longer needed with regard to the purpose of the processing.
  • Accuracy ‒ reasonable measures are to be taken to ensure that the personal data is up-to-date, and that it is possible to correct incorrect data.
  • Privacy by design and security ‒ controllers must set up technical and organisational measures in order to meet the data protection requirements (privacy by design) and, in particular, to ensure a level of data security appropriate to the risks (data security).
  • Privacy by default ‒ unless the data subject directs otherwise, the controller is required to limit the processing to the required minimum through pre-defined settings.

The transfer of personal data to countries that do not provide a level of data protection considered adequate by Swiss law is not permitted unless the protection of the personal data is ensured by other measures (eg, by using the standard contractual clauses of the EU with certain Swiss-specific amendments). In certain cases, the transfer mechanism requires prior approval by or notification to the Swiss Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (FDPIC), the Swiss data protection authority.

The FDPIC is an independent body tasked with supervising private persons and federal bodies with respect to data protection compliance. To this end, the FDPIC has published several non-binding guidelines.

The FDPIC may investigate cases either on its own initiative or at the request of a third party. If such an investigation reveals that data protection regulations are being breached, the FDPIC may issue binding orders (eg, that the processing is fully or partially adjusted, suspended or terminated). The individual or entity subject to such order (but not the data subject) may initiate proceedings against such order before the competent court. The FDPIC may also inform the public of its findings and its decisions in cases of general interest, which may lead to negative publicity. Moreover, the FDPIC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act and may be required, upon request, to release information to the public or the media.

The FDPIC does not have the authority to issue any fines. However, law enforcement agencies may issue fines of up to CHF250,000 for certain data protection breaches. These fines may be imposed on the individuals responsible for a breach, including, if applicable, on directors and officers and employees with independent decision-making power, provided these breaches have been committed wilfully (see Article 12, Criminal Code) and on condition that a subject makes a complaint.

In addition, data subjects may directly take legal action against the violation of their rights under the FADP and related Swiss data protection legislation.

Revised Corporate Law

The new Swiss Corporate Law entered into force on 1 January 2023, aiming to modernise Swiss corporate law. The main changes are:

  • added flexibility of the structuring of the share capital, inter alia with the introduction of the so-called “capital band‟ (a range within which the company’s board may increase or decrease the share capital without further approval by the shareholders’ meeting), allowing a company to have its share capital in its functional currency and reducing the minimum nominal value from CHF0.01 to any amount higher than zero;
  • added flexibility for dividends, in particular by enabling so-called “interim dividends‟, ie, dividends from the profits of the current year;
  • expanding the rights of minority shareholders;
  • enabling virtual shareholders’ meetings and written or electronic shareholders’ resolutions; and
  • restructuring the rules on insolvency and overindebtedness.

Companies have been granted a two-year grace period until 31 December 2024 to amend their articles of association in conformity with the new Swiss Corporate Law.

Walder Wyss Ltd

Seefeldstrasse 123
P.O. Box
8034 Zurich
Switzerland

+41 58 658 14 50

+41 58 658 59 59

philippe.nordmann@walderwyss.com www.walderwyss.com
Author Business Card

Law and Practice in Switzerland

Authors



Walder Wyss Ltd is one of the most successful and fastest-growing Swiss commercial law firms and a full-service law firm with leading specialists across all legal fields, including corporate and commercial, employment, banking and finance, intellectual property and competition, healthcare and life sciences, insolvency, real estate, dispute resolution and tax law. Clients include national and international companies, publicly held corporations and family businesses, public law institutions and private clients. It is a dynamic law firm with flat management structures. The team of around 250 legal experts is augmented by approximately 100 employees working in support functions. Growth and a close relationship with clients are the factors that determine the firm’s success. With offices in Zurich, Geneva, Basel, Berne, Lausanne and Lugano, the firm provides clients with a seamless one-stop shop, and personalised and high-quality services in all language regions of Switzerland.