Main Commercial Vehicles
The main corporate vehicles used in Ecuador are as follows.
Other Entities and Vehicles
The following are also relevant.
Key Decision Factors
The key factors to be considered when choosing a structure are as follows.
Entity Types and Key Requirements
The main requirements for each entity type are as follows.
It should be noted that boards with three or more members require gender parity.
Incorporation Procedure
The incorporation procedure follows these steps.
Ongoing Compliance
The following obligations are ongoing.
Statutory Rules Governing Share Capital
Under the Ecuadorian Companies Act (Ley de Compañías), S.A. and S.A.S. entities issue shares, while Limited Liability Companies (Cía. Ltda.) issue social quotas.
Share Classes and Rights
The S.A.S. allows broad contractual flexibility, while the S.A. is rigidly regulated.
Key Requirements on Distributions and Returns of Capital
The following requirements must be met.
Buybacks, Redemption, Cancellation, Solvency and Financial Assistance
Disclosure Obligations
The following must be reported.
Consequences of Missing or Late Reports
If reports are not filed on time, or are not filed at all, the penalties include:
Primary Legislation
Corporate governance in Ecuador is built mainly on the Companies Law, which sets the rules on shareholders’ meetings, boards, managers, directors’ duties and minority rights for all commercial companies, including the simplified joint stock company (S.A.S.). The Organic Monetary and Financial Code adds specific governance requirements for banks, insurers and other regulated financial institutions. The Securities Market Law imposes additional disclosure, audit and conduct obligations on issuers whose securities are publicly offered.
Secondary Regulation
The following secondary regulations are of relevance:
Codes and Best Practices
The SCVS has issued Ecuadorian corporate governance standards that are largely voluntary for ordinary companies but are increasingly expected of issuers. Separately, savings and credit co-operatives and similar entities must follow the 2025 Good Co-operative Governance Standard issued by the Superintendency of Popular and Solidarity Economy, adapting their internal rules by April 2026.
Core Fiduciary Duties
Directors and managers in Ecuador owe two main duties to the company: the duty of diligence requires them to act with the care of a prudent and informed business person, while the duty of loyalty requires them to put the company’s interests ahead of their own and to disclose and avoid conflicts of interest. Recent reforms to the Companies Law also recognise a business judgement rule, protecting decisions made in good faith, on an informed basis and without personal interest.
Judicial Interpretation
Published case law on directors’ duties remains limited. Many disputes are resolved through arbitration or before the SCVS, so courts have not yet developed a detailed body of doctrine. In practice, judges focus on whether the director followed the law, the by-laws and shareholder resolutions.
Personal Liability
Directors may be held personally and jointly liable when they:
Private Companies
Ecuadorian law gives private companies broad freedom in designing their governance structure. A board of directors is optional, and many companies are managed directly by a general manager and a president appointed by the shareholders. There are no general nationality or residence requirements for directors, although in practice the legal representative needs local tax registration and a reliable presence in Ecuador to deal with authorities.
Listed Companies and Issuers
Issuers of publicly offered securities face stricter standards. They must set up an audit committee whose members are independent from day-to-day management, and they are subject to closer oversight by the SCVS. Banks and insurers must also have their directors qualified by the relevant regulator, which reviews suitability, experience and potential conflicts.
Independence and Diversity
The regulator’s voluntary governance standards recommend independent directors and diverse boards.
Savings and credit co-operatives must apply gender equity in board nominations and have boards of between three and nine members, under the 2025 co-operative governance standard.
When the board of directors has three or more members, at least one member must be female.
Legal Framework
Ecuador’s Constitution recognises the rights of nature, and the Organic Environmental Code imposes strict liability for environmental damage. Recent reforms to the Companies Law also allow companies to adopt BIC status, which commits them to social and environmental goals upon which they must report annually.
Disclosure Requirements
There is currently no mandatory climate-related financial disclosure regime for ordinary companies. However, ESG reporting is growing through other channels:
Directors’ Duties
Directors’ duties are owed to the company, and the law does not expressly require them to weigh stakeholder interests. In BIC companies, however, directors must consider those interests as part of the company’s purpose.
Best Practices
Boards are encouraged to assign ESG oversight to a specific committee, to integrate ESG risks into enterprise risk management, and to report voluntarily under recognised international standards.
General Rules for Companies
Under the Companies Law, directors and managers with a personal interest in a transaction must disclose it and abstain from taking part in the decision. Transactions between the company and its directors generally require prior approval from the board or the shareholders’ meeting, depending on the by-laws. Directors who ignore these rules may be personally liable for any resulting damage.
Financial Institutions and Issuers
Stricter rules apply in regulated sectors:
Tax and Disclosure
Related-party transactions are also subject to transfer pricing rules. Companies above certain thresholds must file annual reports with the tax authority, showing that prices reflect market terms. In practice, many companies adopt internal conflict-of-interest policies and require annual declarations from directors and senior officers.
Core Rights
Ecuadorian law grants shareholders a set of fundamental rights that the by-laws cannot remove. These include:
Shareholders also hold statutory pre-emptive rights on new issuances, although S.A.S. shareholders may waive or modify them. Voting power is proportional to paid-in capital, and by-law clauses restricting the freedom to vote are void, although shareholders may agree privately on how to vote. In limited liability companies (Cía. Ltda.), transfers to outsiders require unanimous consent.
Access to Information
Shareholders have unrestricted access to financial statements, management and audit reports, meeting minutes and the shareholder list. Other company records may be examined under management supervision, and access may be refused only on objective grounds, unless holders of at least 50% of the capital support the request. Before a meeting, shareholders may submit written questions on agenda items and ask to postpone an item for up to three days if information is insufficient. A breach of these rights gives rise to damages rather than the annulment of the meeting.
Fundamental Changes
The general meeting decides on by-law amendments, mergers, spin-offs, transformations, dissolution and the purchase or sale of essential assets. An asset is presumed essential when the transaction exceeds 25% of total assets in the latest approved balance sheet. Shareholders dissenting from these asset transactions or a transformation may withdraw and receive the fair value of their shares.
Statutory Remedies
Holders of 10% of the capital may require a general meeting to be called and, if management fails to act within 15 days, may ask the SCVS to convene it. Holders of 5% may also add one item to the agenda of a convened meeting, within 72 hours of the notice. Challenge routes include:
Judges may also fine claimants who litigate abusively, up to 5% of the company’s equity.
Typical Uses
Shareholder agreements are widely used in joint ventures, private equity transactions and family businesses. They typically address voting commitments, rights of first refusal, tag-along and drag-along rights, lock-ups and exit mechanisms. In an S.A., the by-laws cannot restrict share transfers, so any such restrictions must be set out in a private agreement. S.A.S. by-laws, by contrast, may themselves prohibit transfers or require prior approval.
The SCVS’s Ecuadorian Corporate Governance Standards (Normas Ecuatorianas para el Buen Gobierno Corporativo) are voluntary unless incorporated into the by-laws, which requires two thirds of the capital. They recommend disclosing agreements to the other shareholders and, in widely held companies, avoiding provisions that bind directors’ votes or govern their appointment.
Enforceability
Agreements bind their parties but generally not third parties, unless a third party knew of them. Depositing the agreement at the company’s offices is a key practical step, as the company must then comply with it, and votes cast in breach are not counted. Following a breach, the affected party may seek specific performance or termination, in both cases with damages.
Dispute Resolution
Mediation and arbitration clauses may be included in the by-laws or in a shareholder agreement. By-law arbitration clauses also bind future shareholders, but adding or removing them requires unanimous approval.
Oppression of Minority Shareholders
Ecuador recognises a specific oppression action, comparable to common law unfair prejudice remedies. Any non-controlling shareholder may sue majority shareholders whose conduct undermines minority rights, within one year of the oppressive resolution. Courts may cancel the resolution, order the conduct to cease or require the company to purchase the minority’s shares at fair value.
Derivative Actions
If the general meeting approves proceedings against directors but the company fails to file within one month, any shareholder may sue on its behalf. Claims for breach of the duty of loyalty may be brought directly, without meeting approval. Derivative actions also extend to conflicted shareholders, shareholders who abuse their votes and shadow directors, and are time-barred after five years.
Abuse of Voting Rights
A vote is abusive when it is cast to harm the company or other shareholders, or to obtain an unjustified advantage. Where the minority or a deadlocked group abusively blocks a resolution, courts may order its implementation, which is a useful tool against deadlock.
Exit and Winding-Up
Ecuadorian law does not allow shareholders to petition for winding-up on just and equitable grounds. Disputes are instead generally resolved through buyouts, withdrawal rights or the exclusion of a shareholder. The SCVS may dissolve a company at a party’s request where achieving its corporate purpose becomes clearly impossible.
Principal Sources of Law
M&A transactions in Ecuador are primarily governed by:
Labour, tax, data protection and investment rules also play a decisive role in how transactions are structured.
Private Acquisitions
Most acquisitions involve unlisted companies and are structured as share purchases. Shares in an S.A. or S.A.S. are transferred by private assignment, which becomes effective against the company once recorded in its share register. The SCVS must then be notified within eight days.
In a Cía. Ltda., transfers to third parties require unanimous partner approval. Transforming the target into an S.A. or S.A.S. before the sale may therefore facilitate the transaction.
Asset purchases are less common. Where the assets exceed 25% of the seller’s total assets, shareholder approval is required, and dissenting shareholders may withdraw.
Statutory Mergers and Spin-Offs
Companies may merge by absorption or by forming a new company. Each company’s general meeting approves the merger terms, the SCVS approves the public deed, and the merger takes effect upon registration. The absorbing company succeeds to the rights and obligations of the absorbed company, including licences and permits, provided it meets the applicable requirements.
The Companies Law also offers streamlined routes:
Spin-offs may be total, partial or by segregation of a business unit. These alternatives allow sellers to carve out the relevant business before a sale.
Role of the Courts and Creditors
Ecuador does not provide for court-sanctioned schemes of arrangement, and courts intervene only in specific circumstances. Once the SCVS approves certain corporate acts, an extract is published online and creditors may oppose registration before a civil judge within six days. In mergers by absorption, this step may be avoided where the absorbing company assumes the absorbed company’s liabilities and has sufficient resources to discharge them.
Tender Offers
Acquiring a significant stake in a listed company requires an SCVS-authorised tender offer and, where applicable, competition clearance. Tender offers remain uncommon given the limited number of listed companies.
There is no statutory squeeze-out mechanism. In a merger, however, the absorbing company may offer to acquire minority shares at fair value.
Key Structuring Considerations
Common Deal Structures
Negotiated share purchase agreements are the usual structure, often supported by escrow arrangements or deferred payment mechanisms. Buyers frequently integrate the target through a subsequent merger by absorption, while sellers may use a spin-off to separate the business being sold.
Recent Legislative and Regulatory Changes
The 2023 reforms to the Companies Law introduced the streamlined merger procedures outlined above and additional spin-off modalities. In October 2025, the SCE issued non-binding guidelines on the assessment of concentrations, giving notifying parties greater predictability.
Judicial Developments
The most significant recent ruling is Constitutional Court Judgment 51-25-IN/25 of September 2025, which invalidated a June 2025 law that had barred S.A.S. companies from strategic sectors such as mining, with retroactive effect. Consequently, the S.A.S. remains available as an acquisition vehicle for all lawful activities, although its shares cannot be listed.
Regulatory Framework
Ecuador’s securities rules sit in Book II of the Organic Monetary and Financial Code (COMF), known as the Securities Market Law. Detailed rules appear in the codified resolutions of the Financial and Monetary Policy and Regulation Board. Together they cover offerings, exchanges, brokers, fund and trust managers, rating agencies and issuers.
Regulatory bodies
Public Offerings
A public offering is any invitation to the public, or part of it, to buy or sell securities. Before launching, an issuer must:
Legal representatives are liable for the prospectus. An issuer’s bonds, securitisations and accepted invoices cannot exceed 200% of equity unless extra guarantees cover 120% of the excess; banks and savings co-operatives face a 50% limit.
The SCVS has 15 days to approve a complete file, with silence counting as approval. Financial issuers need their own supervisor’s approval. Approval lasts nine months, and is extendable once. Issuers report material events within three business days and file semi-annual statements.
Exchange Listing
After SCVS approval, securities must also be registered with a stock exchange, which admits them based on that approval. Registering with Quito or Guayaquil covers both. Exchanges require extra documents and reports, and may suspend securities that break their rules, separately from SCVS sanctions.
Prospectus Exemptions
Ecuador has no general private offer exemption: any public offer needs approval, whatever its size. The SCVS can stop offers that look public but lack approval. The following limited cases are not public offerings:
Small and medium-sized companies can use the Special Stock Exchange Registry (REB), which is a simpler segment. Only institutional investors or qualified investors (people with investment experience) may buy.
Resale Restrictions and Consequences
Ecuador sets no minimum holding period. Resale still has limits: offering issued securities to the public needs SCVS approval, and securities in the REB can be traded only there.
Breaking the rules can lead to:
Continuous Disclosure Requirements
Entities registered with the SCVS, not only exchange-listed ones, must keep information current. They file:
Material Events
Legal representatives must report anything that could influence investment decisions, such as mergers or director changes, to the SCVS (and exchanges where relevant) within three business days. Confidentiality needs three-quarters of directors’ approval, with SCVS notice the next business day. False reports are sanctioned.
Market Abuse and Insider Trading
Inside information is knowledge of facts that are able to move securities prices before they become public. Directors, officials and others with access, and their close relatives, must keep such information secret and may not trade on it, reveal it or advise others to trade on it. Price manipulation is banned. The Criminal Code (COIP) punishes fictitious trades, fraudulent price-fixing and false information with three to five years’ prison, but has no specific insider trading offence.
Enforcement Powers
The SCVS can inspect participants and investigate, fine, disqualify and suspend offerings and registrations. It reports crimes to prosecutors. Exchanges sanction rule breaches.
Shareholder Disclosure
Ecuador regulates significant shareholdings in companies registered with the SCVS.
Thresholds and Entities Covered
Consequences of Non-Compliance
Trading without the required notice or OPA is an administrative infringement, punishable by fines and disqualification.
Compliance Programmes and Internal Controls
Directors must act with an orderly businessperson’s care. Brokers, exchanges and fund managers must run an anti-money laundering programme comprising a registered prevention manual, client due diligence, staff training, independent testing and a compliance committee. Each appoints a compliance officer and a deputy.
Whistle-Blowing
These firms must report suspicious operations within five days and transactions of USD10,000 or more monthly. The identity of staff who file such reports is protected. Citizens must also report suspicious activity through the financial intelligence unit’s secure channel.
Governance Frameworks
Companies must adopt conflict-of-interest procedures for directors, and must register beneficial owners with the tax authority.
Principal Laws and Types of Security
Secured lending in Ecuador is governed mainly by:
The main forms of security are as follows.
Perfection and Enforcement
Each type of security has its own formalities. A mortgage needs a public deed and registration; without registration it has no value, and its date counts only from registration. Agricultural and industrial pledges need a written contract and registration in the local registry, and take effect between the parties and against third parties only from that date. Retention of title must be in writing and registered at the Mercantile Registry where the goods are delivered.
A commercial pledge needs a written contract with recognised signatures, and its privilege lasts only while the creditor holds the asset. Pledged shares are noted in the company’s share ledger, and a pledged receivable requires delivery of the title and notice to the debtor. A guarantee trust needs a public deed, and the lender must approve in writing the assets and their value.
Priority follows the Civil Code. The order is as follows:
Trust assets cannot be seized by the debtor’s creditors, unless the contract allows it.
A creditor holding an executive title, such as a notarised contract, mortgage deed or promissory note, can use executive proceedings. The debt must be clear, due and quantifiable, and the debtor’s defences are limited. Pledged assets are sold at public auction or awarded to the creditor at an expert valuation; clauses letting the creditor keep the asset are void. The creditor can bid and offset the price against the debt. Mortgage creditors need not wait for a general insolvency process, but must post a prudent guarantee for first-class claims.
Acquisition Financing
Acquisition financing mixes ordinary security with company law limits. Lenders can take pledges over the target’s shares, mortgages and guarantee trusts. In a share pledge, the owner keeps the votes and dividends, unless the parties agree otherwise. To pledge shares in a limited company, all partners must agree. A company cannot lend money against its own shares. If a listed company gives security over 10% or more of its assets to related parties, an independent expert must prepare a report.
In a guarantee trust, the trustee never becomes the debtor. Banks can benefit from these trusts only for certain listed loans, such as housing or infrastructure, and the trust must be registered in the Securities Registry. Priority among lenders follows the legal order described above.
Recent Changes
Since 2023, promissory notes and bills of exchange (whether physical, dematerialised or electronic) and loan contracts accepted electronically are executive titles; the auction rules were also changed. In 2021, the rules on banks as beneficiaries of guarantee trusts were reformed. The 2024 anti-money laundering law, reformed in 2025 and 2026 and implemented by a February 2026 regulation, bars cash payments of USD10,000 or more, except for obligations arising from financial system products. It also requires companies to register their beneficial owners, and obliges financial institutions to apply customer due diligence. The Commerce Code, issued in 2019 and last reformed in 2025, contains the pledge and retention-of-title rules.
Formation
Ecuador follows the civil law tradition and has no consideration doctrine; its functional equivalent is causa. A valid contract requires capacity, consent free from defects, a lawful object and a lawful cause. Commercial contracts are generally consensual and may be proven by any lawful means, but some transactions are formal. Real estate transfers require a public deed recorded in the Property Registry, and distribution agreements must be in writing. Electronic signatures are fully valid and have become standard practice, including before notaries.
The 2019 Commercial Code replaced a framework dating back to 1906 and regulated contracts that had long remained innominate despite being common in practice, including supply, agency, distribution, franchising and joint ventures. Parties now negotiate against statutory default rules rather than a blank slate.
Invalidity
Absolute nullity arises from an unlawful object or cause, the omission of a required formality, or acts of absolutely incapable persons, and cannot be ratified. Relative nullity arises from defects of consent (mistake, duress or fraud) or relative incapacity, and may be cured by ratification.
Interpretation and Enforcement
A valid contract is “law for the parties” and must be performed in good faith, binding the parties to everything flowing from the nature of the obligation. Where intent is clearly established, it prevails over literal wording. Liability caps and exclusions are generally enforceable, but a waiver of future fraud is void, and gross negligence is treated as equivalent to fraud. Penalty clauses are enforceable but may be judicially reduced when excessive. There is no general B2B unconscionability doctrine, although abusive clauses are void in consumer contracts.
Parties may choose a foreign governing law, subject to public policy and mandatory rules. Arbitration under the Arbitration and Mediation Law is increasingly the preferred forum for commercial disputes, offering speed and specialisation that ordinary courts often cannot.
Remedies
In bilateral contracts, every agreement carries an implied resolutory condition. If one party fails to perform, the non-breaching party may elect either specific performance or termination, and in both cases may claim damages. Damages cover actual loss (daño emergente) and lost profits (lucro cesante). They are limited to foreseeable losses, except in cases of fraud, where the breaching party also answers for unforeseeable direct consequences. As a rule, damages accrue only once the debtor is in default. A party may also withhold its own performance while the other remains in breach (exceptio non adimpleti contractus).
Termination
Ecuadorian law does not recognise unilateral termination for breach as a default rule: termination must be declared by a court or arbitral tribunal. Parties increasingly negotiate express termination clauses to accelerate exit, but their self-executing effect remains debated, and prudent drafting pairs them with arbitration. Long-term and typified commercial contracts, such as agency and distribution, carry additional notice and compensation rules under the 2019 Commercial Code. Wrongful termination is itself a breach, exposing the terminating party to damages and, where still possible, to an order of specific performance.
Force Majeure, Hardship and Frustration
Force majeure is defined as an unforeseeable event that cannot be resisted. It excuses the debtor unless the debtor was already in default or contractually assumed the risk. Ecuador has no general statutory hardship (imprevisión) doctrine, and frustration of purpose is not recognised as an autonomous ground for termination. The COVID-19 pandemic tested this gap. The 2020 Organic Humanitarian Support Law encouraged renegotiation of affected contracts on a temporary basis, but did not create a permanent hardship remedy. As a result, market practice has shifted toward bespoke hardship, renegotiation and price-adjustment clauses, which are now standard in long-term supply, construction and real estate development agreements.
IP is governed by the 2016 Organic Code of the Social Economy of Knowledge, Creativity and Innovation (Código Ingenios), together with Andean Community Decisions 486 (industrial property) and 351 (copyright), and is administered by the National Service of Intellectual Rights (SENADI). Assignments and licences of registered rights should be recorded with SENADI to be enforceable against third parties, and recordal is also relevant for the tax treatment of royalties. Trade secrets are protected as undisclosed information under Código Ingenios and through unfair competition rules, so robust confidentiality covenants remain essential in any deal.
Ownership of IP Created in Commercial Relationships
Código Ingenios reversed the traditional employer-friendly rule, which is the single most important IP point in Ecuadorian M&A and technology deals.
Copyright
Unless otherwise agreed or specially provided, ownership of works created under an employment relationship or on commission belongs to the author, not the employer or commissioning party. Moreover, such authors retain a right to equitable remuneration for the exploitation of their work, except in the case of software, and this right applies even where ownership of the work is transferred. Express assignment clauses in employment and service contracts are therefore indispensable, and IP chain-of-title is now a standard due diligence item.
Patents
Patent rights over inventions developed in performance of a contract belong to the commissioning party or employer, unless otherwise agreed, but inventors hold an inalienable right to participate in ownership and in the benefits of exploitation in a percentage of no less than 25%.
Joint development
Absent agreement, co-ownership rules apply, making contractual allocation critical.
AI-generated content
Authorship presupposes a human creator. There is not yet any specific legislation or case law on AI-generated works, so ownership must be allocated contractually.
Remedies
Rights holders may pursue administrative enforcement before SENADI (cease-and-desist orders and fines), civil actions for injunctions and damages, precautionary measures including seizures, and border measures. Criminal liability is limited to commercial-scale counterfeiting and piracy.
Principal Framework
Consumer relationships are governed by the Organic Consumer Protection Law (LODC). Its provisions are of public order, prevail over ordinary laws, and must be interpreted in the manner most favourable to the consumer in case of doubt. In practice, this means commercial terms cannot contract out of the LODC in B2C dealings. Key features include:
E-commerce is further governed by the Electronic Commerce Law, the e-commerce provisions of the 2019 Commercial Code and the 2021 Organic Personal Data Protection Law, which now shapes most online consumer contracting.
Enforcement
The Ombudsman’s Office (Defensoría del Pueblo) handles consumer complaints and mediation. Infringements are prosecuted before judges with jurisdiction over contraventions, who can impose fines and order full reparation. The competition authority sanctions misleading advertising and deceptive practices as unfair competition.
Approach of Courts and Regulators
Enforcement remains largely complaint-driven and fragmented, which is precisely what the legislature has tried to fix. A comprehensive bill to replace the 2000 law, adding specific rules on e-commerce and digital platforms and a dedicated sanctioning regime, passed first debate in May 2025. However, the committee recommended shelving it at second debate, and a new reform bill was introduced in early 2026. For businesses, the practical takeaway is to align online terms with international standards: platform regulation is coming, and the direction of travel is clear.
Framework
Merger control is governed by the Organic Law on Market Power Regulation and Control (LORCPM) and its regulations, and enforced by the SCE. Only horizontal and vertical transactions require mandatory prior notification. Conglomerate deals have been excluded from mandatory control by the authority’s own precedents, so do not require notification.
Thresholds and Timing
Notification is mandatory when either of the following two thresholds is met:
A recent reform created uncertainty as to whether turnover is now measured only in the affected relevant market, although the SCE’s notification form still refers to the parties’ total turnover in Ecuador.
The filing deadline is unusually tight, at eight calendar days from the conclusion of the agreement. Pre-filing consultations and a fast-track procedure are available. The substantive test asks whether the transaction may significantly restrict competition, with the SCE assessing market definition, shares and concentration indices (HHI).
What’s New
On 6 October 2025, the SCE issued its non-binding Guidelines for the Analysis of Economic Concentration Transactions, which clarify jurisdictional questions, simplified review scenarios and the treatment of ancillary restraints such as non-compete clauses.
Failure to Notify
Failure to notify a transaction subject to prior control, or closing before authorisation, is a serious infringement. It exposes the parties to turnover-based fines and to corrective measures, including the reversal of the transaction.
Anti-Competitive Conduct
Cartels and abuse of dominance are sanctioned with fines calculated as a percentage of turnover, together with cease-and-desist orders and corrective remedies. A leniency programme is available for cartel participants who self-report. Private parties may also claim damages before the courts.
Review and Approval
Ecuador has no general foreign investment screening regime. Under the Organic Code of Production, Trade and Investment (COPCI), foreign investors receive national treatment and may freely establish companies, acquire shares and repatriate profits. Foreign direct investment is registered with the Central Bank for statistical purposes only. There is no approval requirement, no deal-size threshold and no filing fee.
Restricted Sectors
The Constitution reserves strategic sectors to the State, including hydrocarbons, mining, energy, telecommunications and water. Private and foreign capital participates through concessions, delegated management and public-private partnerships rather than outright ownership. Further sector-specific rules apply.
These restrictions are enforced through sector licensing; non-compliant transfers may be denied registration or approval, or declared void.
National Security Review
There is no standalone national security review process. Security considerations operate only through the sector-specific rules outlined above.
Incentives
The main tool is the investment contract, which grants stability to tax incentives for its term, along with customs and foreign currency outflow tax (ISD) exemptions on capital goods and access to arbitration. The December 2023 Organic Law on Economic Efficiency lowered the minimum investment required to sign an investment contract from USD250,000 to USD100,000. The same reform relaunched the former special economic development zones (ZEDEs) as free trade zones, with more flexible rules and tax benefits for operators and users. Sector incentives also exist for tourism, renewable energy and PPP projects.
Recent Developments
The reforms of 2023 lowered barriers to investment contracts and revamped the free trade zones. Ecuador has also expanded its trade network, notably with the China FTA. The main remaining constraint is constitutional. Article 422 limits the State’s ability to submit investment disputes to international arbitration, and voters rejected lifting this restriction in the April 2024 referendum. Investors therefore rely on investment contracts and arbitration clauses within the constitutional exceptions.
Data protection is governed by the 2021 Organic Personal Data Protection Law (LOPDP), its 2023 General Regulation, and a fast-growing body of secondary rules issued by the Superintendency of Personal Data Protection (SPDP). The SPDP became fully operational in 2025, and that year marked the shift from a “law on paper” to active supervision. Sector rules overlay the LOPDP, notably for credit information and banking secrecy, health data and telecommunications.
Key Obligations
The LOPDP is closely modelled on the EU’s GDPR.
Cross-Border Transfers and Localisation
In the most significant development of 2026, the SPDP issued the General Regulation on National and International Transfers of Personal Data on 28 January 2026. International transfers not covered by an adequacy decision or recognised safeguards must now be registered in the National Data Protection Registry. Recognised safeguards include binding corporate rules, codes of conduct and certification. Controllers must also keep an updated record of all transfers, and a transitional regime allows previously undeclared transfers to be regularised. There is no general data localisation requirement, but intra-group data flows and cloud arrangements now require documented safeguards, making transfer mapping a priority for multinational groups.
The framework was overhauled in 2025. The Organic Law on the Prevention, Detection and Combat of Money Laundering and the Financing of Other Crimes entered into force on 29 July 2025, replacing the previous law. The changes most relevant to businesses are as follows.
Ecuador has no autonomous economic sanctions regime. Targeted financial sanctions by the UN Security Council are implemented through the AML framework: obliged entities must screen against binding lists and report matches. Export controls are limited to sector-specific rules. In practice, the greater exposure for local businesses comes from foreign regimes such as OFAC, which drive the requirements of correspondent banks.
The COIP establishes criminal liability for legal entities, and 2021 reforms criminalised private-to-private bribery, alongside recognising effective compliance programmes as a factor in assessing corporate liability. Companies typically structure programmes around a compliance officer, risk mapping, third-party due diligence, gifts-and-hospitality policies and whistle-blowing channels, often aligned with ISO 37001.
The UAFE and the sector superintendencies supervise and sanction obliged entities through fines, licence measures and, now, administrative freezes. The Attorney General’s Office prosecutes money laundering and corruption offences, and the Comptroller General audits the use of public funds.
Environmental Requirements
The 2008 Constitution is unusual: it recognises nature as a holder of rights and establishes strict and joint liability for environmental damage. Environmental actions are also imprescriptible. The Organic Environmental Code (COA) and its regulations implement this framework. Projects require a registration or an environmental licence, depending on their impact level, issued through the online system SUIA, with environmental impact studies and public participation required for higher-impact projects. In transactions, environmental licences and remediation obligations follow the asset or project, and transferring a licence requires authority approval. Environmental due diligence is therefore not optional. Ecuador has no carbon tax or emissions trading system, and carbon markets remain voluntary.
Climate Litigation and Corporate Liability
Ecuador is a global reference in rights-of-nature litigation. In the Los Cedros case (2021), the Constitutional Court annulled mining permits in a protected forest on rights-of-nature grounds. In the 2023 Yasuní referendum, voters mandated the phase-out of oil extraction in Block 43. Courts have also ordered the progressive elimination of gas flaring in the Amazon. For investors, the practical consequence is that constitutional actions can suspend permits already granted, so permitting risk now extends beyond regulatory compliance to rights-of-nature and prior consultation challenges.
Health and Safety
Ecuador is a unitary state, so there is no federal–provincial interaction. OHS obligations derive from the Labour Code and the 2022 Regulation on Occupational Health and Safety. They are supervised by the Ministry of Labour, while the IESS manages occupational risk insurance. Employers must maintain risk assessments, safety committees and medical surveillance proportional to their size.
Licensing and Sector Regimes
Every business needs municipal operating licences. Regulated sectors require specific authorisations:
In M&A, changes of control in regulated entities frequently require prior approval or notification, which should be built into transaction timelines as a condition precedent.
Ecuador has no AI-specific legislation. AI systems are governed by general rules, the most relevant of which is the LOPDP. It grants individuals the right not to be subject to decisions based solely or partially on automated processing, requires impact assessments for high-risk processing, and imposes transparency duties on controllers. Constitutional non-discrimination guarantees, consumer protection rules on information and misleading practices, and the human-authorship requirement under Código Ingenios complete the picture. In practice, AI governance in Ecuador today is data protection governance.
Policy and Proposed Legislation
2026 has been a defining year, albeit without a law.
Practical Obligations
Pending legislation, organisations deploying AI should treat LOPDP compliance as the baseline, implementing documented legal bases, impact assessments for profiling and automated decisions, human review mechanisms, and contractual allocation of liability with AI vendors. The direction of travel points to a risk-based model inspired by the EU AI Act, so early alignment with that model is the prudent course.
Beyond the regimes previously outlined, foreign investors most often underestimate the following four areas.
A further labour obligation affects larger employers, which must meet a minimum quota for hiring persons with disabilities; non-compliance is sanctioned with fines.
Compliance is increasingly digital. Electronic invoicing is mandatory, and the SRI and the Superintendency of Companies cross-check data automatically, so inconsistencies between tax, corporate and AML filings are now detected far more quickly than in the past. For new entrants, the practical recommendation is to build a single integrated compliance calendar from day one, covering corporate, tax, labour, data protection and AML obligations.
Principal Employment Framework
The employment regulatory framework in Ecuador is led by the Constitution, which guarantees non-waivable rights, job stability and fair compensation. Likewise, the Labour Code regulates the employment relationship, defining contractual modalities, working hours, salary payments, statutory bonuses and the calculation of overtime and supplementary hours. In addition, the Ministry of Labour regularly issues Ministerial Agreements that regulate specific employment contracts, administrative procedures and working schedules tailored to various economic sectors. Furthermore, the Social Security Law mandates compulsory enrolment for all payroll employees from their first day of work, while an approved Internal Work Regulation establishes the company’s operational rules and disciplinary regime.
Termination Procedures and Just Cause (Visto Bueno)
To legally terminate an employment relationship without incurring wrongful dismissal indemnities, employers must substantiate the termination under statutory grounds set by law. The formal mechanism to establish just cause is the administrative procedure known as Visto Bueno, conducted before a Labour Inspector from the Ministry of Labour. This petition must be filed within a strict, non-extendable one-month deadline from either the commission of the infraction or the date the employer became aware of it. Common grounds include unexcused absences for more than three consecutive days, severe indiscipline, manifest ineptitude, and workplace harassment or violence.
During this administrative procedure, both parties submit evidence within a formal hearing, enabling the Labour Inspector to issue a reasoned decision. This decision may be challenged by either party through administrative channels and subsequently before the judicial courts. Without a favourable Visto Bueno resolution, any unilateral termination is treated as wrongful dismissal, triggering the obligation to pay statutory severance.
Wrongful Dismissal Claims and Remedies
Wrongful dismissal occurs when an employer unilaterally terminates an employment contract without statutory grounds or a favourable Visto Bueno ruling. In such cases, Ecuadorian law entitles the employee to statutory severance payments calculated based on length of service and compensation. Except for special protected categories (such as pregnant workers or union leaders), the standard legal remedy is monetary compensation rather than job reinstatement. Judicial claims for these payments and unpaid benefits may be brought before Labour Courts within a general three-year statute of limitations.
Constructive Dismissal and Employer Liability
Constructive dismissal occurs when employer actions force an employee to resign by substantially and adversely altering their agreed working conditions. Practices such as unilateral job demotions, unexpected compensation reductions or systematic wage delays entitle the employee to request a Visto Bueno against the employer. If the administrative or judicial authority confirms the employer’s breach, the company is required to pay indemnities equivalent to a wrongful dismissal. To mitigate these legal risks, companies must strictly document all organisational changes and maintain effective internal dispute resolution mechanisms.
Executive Compensation Structuring
Executive incentive structuring in Ecuador fundamentally depends on whether the officer is legally classified as a commercial manager or as an employee under an employment relationship. According to the Labour Code, legal representatives holding general administrative powers of attorney act as commercial managers and are excluded from standard labour regulations. Consequently, their fees and performance bonuses are freely negotiated without statutory obligations to pay mandatory employment benefits such as 13th and 14th month salaries, reserve funds or the 15% profit-sharing allocation. Conversely, senior executives without legal representation are protected by labour law, which mandates guarantees for social security enrolment, paid vacations, overtime and supplementary hours, agreed bonuses, profit sharing, statutory bonus salaries, and wrongful dismissal severance.
Equity-Based Incentives
The introduction of the S.A.S. has provided flexibility for issuing special share classes tailored for retention programmes. Despite this corporate option, phantom shares and cash-settled stock appreciation rights remain the most widely used tools in Ecuador as bonuses or long-term incentives. These synthetic incentives grant executives the right to receive financial payouts tied to company valuation without granting shareholder status, thereby eliminating corporate deadlock risks or minority litigation. Governed by freedom of contract principles, these plans feature vesting schedules or specific performance targets with clear payout rules, executed through commercial service contracts or payroll performance bonus agreements.
Tax and Social Security Implications
All monetary compensation received by an executive constitutes taxable income that must be reported as a bonus within the personal income tax base. For payroll employees, these amounts are also subject to mandatory contributions to the IESS. To ensure that these payments are deductible as operating expenses in the company’s corporate income tax return, employers must timely execute all corresponding tax withholdings and social security contributions. Any failure to withhold or contribute results in the rejection of the tax deduction and the assessment of tax adjustments and interest charges against the company.
Change of Control Provisions
These control agreements are fully valid and enforceable for commercial managers under general freedom of contract principles. Within these management agreements, parties may freely agree on financial compensation or contractual penalties triggered by an early removal resulting from a corporate merger or acquisition. However, for executives employed under a labour relationship, these benefits must be structured as independent extraordinary bonuses in addition to mandatory, non-waivable statutory severance payments. Rigorous drafting must prevent these bonuses from being reclassified as part of the executive’s regular salary, thereby avoiding retroactive claims for social security contribution recalculations.
Restrictive Covenants
The validity and enforceability of restrictive covenants in Ecuador vary substantially depending on the legal framework under which they are agreed upon.
Non-competition
During the employment relationship, the duty of non-competition is mandatory, and its breach constitutes just cause for dismissal through a Visto Bueno procedure. However, post-employment non-compete clauses in labour contracts are considered null and void for violating the constitutional right to work. In contrast, commercial non-compete covenants are fully enforceable provided they are limited in time, geographic scope and objective, and include express financial compensation.
Non-solicitation
Agreements prohibiting the diversion of clients or the poaching of key employees are broadly recognised under commercial and competition laws. Their procedural enforceability before courts is significantly enhanced by incorporating penalty clauses that predetermine liquidated damages, avoiding complex expert evidence on damages.
Confidentiality
Confidentiality and trade secret protection agreements are highly effective and may extend indefinitely following the executive’s departure. Ecuadorian legislation authorises civil precautionary measures and even criminal sanctions for the unauthorised disclosure or exploitation of commercial secrets.
Forms of Land Ownership and Acquisition
The Ecuadorian Civil Code recognises individual and collective private property rights, authorising co-ownership and horizontal property regimes for subdivided independent units. Real estate may be acquired through purchase, donation, dation in payment, acquisitive prescription, testate or intestate succession, or structured via trusts. In urban areas, land use and development are regulated by Land Use and Management Plans (PUGS) enacted by local municipal governments. In addition, the Constitution recognises community and ancestral land rights belonging to indigenous communities, which remain inalienable, unseizable and indivisible.
Requirements and Restrictions
Foreign individuals enjoy the same civil rights to acquire, encumber and sell real estate as Ecuadorian citizens, requiring only a valid passport to execute public deeds without prior legal residency requirements. For foreign corporations acquiring real estate as a passive asset or non-recurring investment, the Companies Law does not mandate branch domiciliation, requiring only the registration of a local general power of attorney. However, if property ownership or usage forms part of regular and ongoing commercial operations, the foreign entity is required to formally establish a local branch with the Superintendency of Companies.
Territorial Restrictions and Public Domain Assets
Ecuadorian legislation enforces specific geographic and legal boundaries on real estate acquisition.
Tax Framework, Exemptions and Foreign Currency Outflow Tax
Ecuador does not impose discriminatory taxes based on foreign nationality, but property transfers are subject to local municipal transfer taxes (Alcabalas) and urban capital gains taxes (Plusvalía). In addition, specific cantons such as Guayaquil levy an additional surcharge benefiting the Junta de Beneficencia, alongside mandatory regulated notary fees and Property Registry filing fees defined by local municipal ordinances. At the national level, capital gains realised by natural persons from occasional real estate sales (up to two non-habitual transfers per fiscal year) are exempt from Income Tax. When a non-resident owner sells property and repatriates the funds abroad via the financial system, the transfer is subject to the Foreign Currency Outflow Tax (ISD), while foreign capital is incentivised through a five-year Temporary Fiscal Residency for real estate investments of at least USD150,000.
Legal Framework and Real Estate Registration
The regulatory framework governing commercial real estate transactions in Ecuador is based primarily on the Civil Code and the Code of Commerce, and secondarily on the Companies Law and the Organic Code of Territorial Organisation (COOTAD). Property conveyances and the creation of in rem rights strictly require the execution of a public deed before a notary public. Furthermore, the land registration system is decentralised, with an independent Property Registry operating in each canton. Mandatory registration of the public deed at the Property Registry of the canton where the asset is located is a constitutive legal requirement for ownership transfer and enforceability against third parties.
Due Diligence, Title Insurance and Environmental Liability
Acquiring or disposing of commercial real estate requires rigorous legal due diligence to mitigate operational and financial risks. Key considerations include the following.
Title insurance is not a customary or standard practice in Ecuador, as legal certainty is achieved through comprehensive due diligence and official public land registry certificates. Regarding environmental liability, the COA imposes strict and joint liability for environmental remediation on property owners and operators. Consequently, conducting Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments is highly recommended for industrial and complex commercial assets, to avoid inheriting historical contamination liabilities.
Commercial Mortgage Financing
Commercial real estate financing is typically secured through mortgages executed via public deed and registered at the local Property Registry. Under the Civil Code, mortgage claims rank as third-class preferred credits, granting the lender priority over the proceeds from the judicial sale of the encumbered asset. This priority can only be displaced by first-class privileged claims, such as labour liabilities, statutory child support or direct tax debts, if the debtor possesses no other assets. When multiple mortgages encumber the same property, priority among creditors is determined strictly by the chronological order of their registration.
Upon a payment default, the lender initiates judicial foreclosure proceedings to obtain an attachment order and register a prohibition to sell the asset. Subsequently, the property is appraised by a court-appointed expert for public auction. In Ecuador, judicial foreclosures are conducted exclusively through the online auction system managed by the Judicial Council. Lenders are strictly prohibited from directly appropriating or taking possession of the mortgaged asset without completing the public auction process.
Commercial Leases
Commercial property leases are governed by the Code of Commerce and the Civil Code under general freedom of contract principles, distinguishing them from residential tenancies governed by the Tenancy Law. Parties to a commercial lease are free to negotiate duration, rent amounts, adjustment formulas and security deposits. By statutory default, tenants are strictly prohibited from assigning the lease or subletting the premises without the express written consent of the landlord.
Furthermore, commercial legislation does not grant tenants an automatic right to lease renewal or first refusal upon expiration. To prevent unwanted tacit renewals, commercial agreements typically include express expiration terms and structured renewal procedures. In cases of tenant default or breach of contract, parties commonly rely on contractual penalty clauses and dispute resolution through mediation and arbitration centres. In the absence of an arbitration clause, landlords must pursue judicial eviction and contract termination before civil courts.
Recent Developments
Ecuadorian authorities have recently tightened anti-money laundering controls through regulations issued by the UAFE. A notable regulation strictly prohibits cash payments equal to or exceeding USD10,000 for real estate transactions, requiring mandatory banking channels. For transactions under this threshold, parties must submit a sworn declaration confirming the lawful origin of funds. In addition, national tax regulations continue to exempt capital gains earned by natural persons from occasional real estate sales, provided the seller conducts no more than two transfers per fiscal year outside their ordinary business.
Avenida Francisco de Orellana
Edificio World Trade Center
Torre B, Piso 6, Of. 605
Guayaquil
Ecuador
(+593) 46008613
rarevalo@vivancoyvivanco.com vivancoyvivanco.com
Sports Corporations in Ecuador: Opening Professional Football to Private Capital
The end of the associative model
The most significant corporate development of 2026 in Ecuador came from an unexpected field: professional sport. The Organic Law on Sport, Physical Education and Recreation (LODEFR), published in Official Register No 223 on 11 February 2026, replaced the 2010 Sports Law and created the sports corporation, or sociedad anónima deportiva (SAD). For the first time, Ecuadorian football clubs can become commercial companies with capital divided into shares, open to private and foreign investment.
The framework was completed in June 2026. The General Regulation to the LODEFR was issued by Executive Decree No 422, and on 24 June 2026 the Superintendency of Companies, Securities and Insurance (SCVS) issued Resolution No SCVS-INC-DNCDN-2026-002, which regulates the transformation of existing clubs into SADs.
The reform responds to four structural limits of the associative model, under which clubs operated as non-profit corporations or foundations.
These limits weigh most heavily on the clubs that matter most to investors. Clubs with large fan bases and costly infrastructure, such as Barcelona SC, and clubs with growth-oriented models, such as Independiente del Valle, need organised finances to attract capital at an international level. The SAD gives them, for the first time, a corporate vehicle designed for that purpose.
Legal nature and dual regulatory framework
An SAD is a commercial sociedad anónima whose capital is divided into negotiable shares and whose corporate purpose is limited to sporting activities and related commercial activities. Shareholders are liable only up to their contribution, unless a court or arbitral tribunal disregards the company’s legal personality under the Companies Law.
The key to the regime is that each SAD belongs to two legal worlds at once.
For investors, this means two layers of oversight: one of the market and one of sporting integrity.
Several features distinguish the SAD from a club. Its highest body is the shareholders’ meeting, a board of directors is optional, and its legal representative is not subject to the re-election limits that apply to club officers. As profit-making entities, SADs cannot receive subsidies, transfers or grants from the sports authority, although they keep general tax incentives for sport. Specific tax rules from the Internal Revenue Service (SRI) are still pending.
The law requires the abbreviation “SAD” in the company name, while the SCVS resolution refers to “S.A.D.”. The accepted form should be confirmed when reserving the name.
Two routes in: incorporation and transformation
An SAD can be incorporated from scratch or created by transforming an existing club. A new SAD follows the general rules for any sociedad anónima and then applies for entry in the National Registry of Sports Organisations.
A transformation, not a dissolution
The transformation route is the more innovative of the two. The club adopts the legal form of a commercial company without being dissolved and without losing its legal personality. The SAD is the legal successor of the club and retains all its rights and obligations, including player contracts, sporting recognitions and sporting rights. No new club is born: the same legal entity continues, with its full history, brand and fan base, under a new organisational structure.
Transformation is voluntary. The SCVS resolution makes it available to specialised or professional clubs organised as non-profit corporations or foundations, although the LODEFR itself uses broader wording. The voluntary design reduces the risk of legitimacy conflicts with members. Argentina offers a useful contrast: the opening promoted there in 2024 met strong resistance from the national football association and from clubs defending their social role.
Requirements of Article 181 of the LODEFR
Article 181 subjects transformation to three requirements:
The sports authority may refuse authorisation if the club owes money to athletes, coaches or other entities of the national or international sports system, or if it faces judicial or administrative proceedings affecting its institutional integrity.
The transformation roadmap
Once the transformation is approved, the process is expected to take between 30 and 60 days. The club’s president retains legal representation until registration and the appointment of the definitive legal representative.
Dissenting members may withdraw instead of becoming shareholders. However, because club assets cannot be divided, they receive no share of said assets.
Two registrations and the six-month deadline
An SAD exists once it is registered in the Mercantile Registry, but it cannot compete until it is also registered with the sports authority. If an SAD has no sports registration six months after its commercial registration, the SCVS may order its dissolution.
The law does not distinguish between new and transformed SADs, so transformed clubs should assume that the deadline applies to them as well. Sports registration requires an annual sports plan, a federation report, performance indicators and compliance with infrastructure standards. The sporting file should therefore be prepared in parallel with the corporate one, not after it.
SAD ownership: the multi-club restriction
An SAD can have a single shareholder, whether an individual or a company, and there is no maximum number of shareholders. The defining ownership rule is a restriction on multi-club holdings. No person may hold shares, directly or indirectly, in more than one SAD in the same sport. Holdings through subsidiaries or holding structures count. The rule protects the integrity of competitions and limits conflicts of interest, but it is also where the framework is least settled.
Until this is clarified, investors should seek confirmation from the authorities before structuring a multi-club investment.
Conversely, one SAD may hold more than one club, provided they do not compete at the same time in the same sport, category and series. Compliance must be verified by the SAD’s legal representative and, in a public offering, also by the brokerage house and the stock exchange.
Share transfers and anti-money laundering checks
SAD shares are registered and negotiable. A transfer follows the Companies Law: it is documented by an assignment, becomes effective once entered in the share register and is reported to the SCVS, subject to any conditions in the by-laws. Three additional checks apply.
If the shareholders decide to open the capital to the public, the rules on primary public offerings apply, with brokerage houses involved under SCVS supervision. This creates, for the first time, a potential route to an organised capital market for Ecuadorian sport.
Initial capital, losses and inherited debts
For a transformed club, the starting point is its audited financial statements. The external audit determines the club’s net equity, and the general assembly fixes the initial share capital on that basis. The assembly may also set a higher figure or authorise the issue of shares at a premium, which allows the entry valuation to recognise the value the club has accumulated. The by-laws may define how capital is allocated between continuing members and new investors.
The capital can never be lower than the minimum set by the SCVS. Neither the LODEFR nor its regulations fix a figure, and the general minimum for a sociedad anónima is currently USD800. Investors should watch for a specific, higher threshold for SADs.
If the audit shows losses, continuing members must contribute enough to cover such losses and reach the agreed capital, as approved by the assembly that resolves the transformation. Two points are critical.
The audit, the expert valuation, the interim financial statements and the transformation balance sheet may show different figures, so they should be co-ordinated early.
Open questions
The framework is new, and several points await secondary regulation or clarification.
The identity issue can be managed through the by-laws. Governance mechanisms such as minority quotas or veto rights over identity-related decisions can balance the interests of investors and fans.
There is also a structural paradox. The clubs most in need of capital tend to be the most indebted, yet Article 181 allows the sports authority to refuse transformation where sporting debts are unpaid. Without a financial restructuring plan, the SAD may remain open mainly to financially sound clubs.
Practical recommendations
For investors
An investor in an SAD does not finance an empty structure: it acquires a stake in an entity with a track record, a brand and a fan base, supervised by the SCVS and backed by audited accounts and an anti-money laundering verification from day one. According to public information available as of October 2026, no Serie A club has yet completed its transformation, so early movers will have more room to negotiate terms. Before investing, they should:
Once invested, they should account for ongoing duties. An SAD must:
Breaches can lead to cancellation of the sports registration.
For clubs
A club considering transformation should start with a comprehensive audit of its assets, liabilities and judicial contingencies, since future shareholders will inherit them. It should settle or restructure debts with athletes, coaches and sports entities before seeking authorisation. It should then design the by-laws and share allocation with legal and financial advice, and communicate transparently with members so that the two-thirds vote is informed, not merely formal.
Finally, the club must model its viability without public subsidies. That means projecting whether commercial, broadcasting and sponsorship revenue can offset the state support it will lose, and building a realistic timetable around the 15-day notice period, the 60-day filing window and the six-month registration deadline.
Conclusion
The SAD is the deepest reform of the legal organisation of professional sport in Ecuador in more than a decade. It offers a voluntary framework that combines legal continuity, SCVS oversight, mandatory audits, anti-money laundering controls and rules of competitive integrity. It places Ecuador within a regional and European trend that already includes Spain, Portugal, Chile and Brazil.
For investors able to manage the additional regulatory layer, the SAD may become the standard model for professional sport in the country. Its greatest risk, however, is the belief that a change of corporate form is enough to improve management. The SAD does not replace financial discipline, good governance or the relationship with the sporting community; it is only the instrument. If authorities refine the open questions and clubs protect members, athletes and creditors, the SAD can become an engine of modernisation rather than an empty shell.
Avenida Francisco de Orellana
Edificio World Trade Center
Torre B, Piso 6, Of. 605
Guayaquil
Ecuador
(+593) 46008613
rarevalo@vivancoyvivanco.com vivancoyvivanco.com