Investment Funds 2026

Last Updated February 05, 2026

Spain

Law and Practice

Authors



PricewaterhouseCoopers Tax & Legal, S.L. is the legal firm of PwC Spain, with significant depth and range of resources across five continents, including those focused on the investment management sector. The firm’s professionals think big and anticipate regulatory challenges and risks that could affect clients’ business. As a leading tax and legal adviser, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) stands out not only in size – the largest law firm and tax advisory practice – but also in the scope and reputation of its services. Backed by a seamlessly connected international network, the firm is able to support investment fund clients, helping them make the best decisions for their business and offering them a holistic approach during the full fund life cycle, from structuring and formation to marketing, operations and transactions. PwC provides ongoing or project-based legal and tax services. The firm is ranked in multiple Guides by Chambers and Partners, including Global, Europe, and NewLaw.

Spain offers a mature and sophisticated regulatory environment for investment funds, covering both alternative investment funds and retail funds. The framework is designed to balance investor protection with market efficiency, enabling sponsors to structure, market and manage products benefiting from established supervisory practices, transparent authorisation processes and a consistent approach to ongoing oversight. Spain remains an attractive jurisdiction for both domestic and cross-border fund initiatives.

The Spanish regime is aligned with the EU’s legislative architecture, most notably the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) and the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) framework. These Directives have been transposed into a well‑established national rulebook, creating continuity between European standards and Spanish operational practice. This dual anchoring – EU rules implemented through mature local legislation – supports legal certainty, facilitates cross‑border distribution and ensures that investor safeguards meet European benchmarks.

Spanish sponsors can access a broad suite of vehicles, including both Spain‑specific structures and EU‑passportable options, enabling tailored solutions across asset classes and investor profiles. These vehicles are well known to the market and have a track record of acceptance among domestic institutions, international allocators and retail investors alike. The availability of recognisable structures reduces friction in fundraising, simplifies due diligence and supports efficient distribution. In practice, managers can align vehicle selection with strategy, liquidity and tax considerations, while remaining within a framework that investors already understand.

The Spanish Securities Market Commission (CNMV) is the competent authority for investment funds. Through circulars, guidance and publicly available Q&A materials, the CNMV clarifies expectations on authorisation, disclosure, risk management and ongoing reporting. This guidance fosters consistency in supervisory outcomes and helps market participants operationalise regulatory requirements with confidence. Importantly, the CNMV’s emphasis on transparency and investor protection has supported trust in the Spanish funds market.

Spanish Law 22/2014 transposed the AIFMD and provides the core framework for Spanish closed-ended alternative investment funds, while Law 35/2003 (LIIC) and Spanish Regulation 1082/2012 (RIIC) govern open-ended funds, including UCITS and non-UCITS AIFs. Structures are identified by their legal form and investment policy. The market relies on a set of established vehicles that align with private equity and venture capital, broader closed-ended strategies, EU-labelled vehicles, and open-ended hedge strategies.

Spain offers both corporate (with separate legal personality) and contractual (fund, with no separate legal personality) forms for AIF. Sponsors select the corporate form where governance, board control and equity-style mechanics are prioritised, and the fund form where LP-style (limited partner) commitments and capital accounts are preferred.

Spanish AIF Vehicles

Spanish closed-ended vehicles under Law 22/2014 include the following categories, each available as a company or a fund.

  • Private equity entities (entidades de capital riesgo – ECR), which can be incorporated as limited partnerships (FCR) or as companies (SCR) and that can accommodate mainly private equity and venture capital strategies.
  • Small and medium-size private equity entities (entidades de capital riesgo-PYMES – ECR-PYMES), which can be incorporated as limited partnerships (FCR-PYMES) or as companies (SCR-PYMES), and can accommodate mainly private equity and venture capital strategies to invest in SMEs.
  • Closed-ended collective investment undertakings (entidades de inversion colectiva de tipo cerrado – EICC), which can also be incorporated as limited partnerships (FICC) or as companies (SICC) and, unlike the ECR or ECR-PYMES, may be used for all kinds of asset classes, including debt and pure real estate investment strategies.

Spanish opened-ended vehicles under LIIC include the fondo de inversión libre (FIL or IICIL) and funds of hedge funds (FOFIL or IICIICIL), with corporate analogues also available.

EU-Labelled Vehicles

Other AIFs that can be established in Spain but will be regulated by the relevant EU Regulation (and on a supplementary basis by Law 22/2014) are as follows, also available under a corporate or fund form.

  • European venture capital funds (EuVECA) – known in Spain as FCRE (fondo de capital riesgo europeo), they suit early‑stage and growth venture strategies that target qualifying portfolio undertakings and the wish to access a simplified cross‑border marketing label.
  • European social entrepreneurship funds (EuSEF) – known in Spain as FESE (fondo de emprendimiento social europeo), they fit social entrepreneurship and impact strategies that comply with specific use‑of‑proceeds and portfolio eligibility tests.
  • European long-term investment funds (ELTIF) – know in Spain as FILPE (fondo de inversión a largo plazo europeo), they are used for long‑term private markets strategies – including private credit, infrastructure, real estate and growth equity – and can be structured as closed‑ended or, subject to liquidity safeguards, with limited redemptions during life.

Managers and Advisers: Principal Legal Vehicles

Spanish AIF funds must be managed by a regulated management company while corporate form Spanish AIFs may opt to be self-managed (in which case they need to be authorised prior) or to delegate the management of their assets to a regulated management company.

Closed-ended AIFs are managed by a Sociedad Gestora de Entidades de Inversión de Tipo Cerrado (SGEIC) regulated under Law 22/2014. SGEICs come in two categories that align with AIFMD thresholds:

  • exempt SGEICs with assets below management thresholds; and
  • fully licensed SGEICs when such thresholds are exceeded.

Fully licensed SGEICs are subject to enhanced requirements on depositaries, investor disclosures, investment restrictions and regulatory reporting, and can access the AIFMD passport to manage or market within the EU.

Under LIIC, a Sociedad Gestora de Instituciones de Inversión Colectiva (SGIIC) manages open-ended AIFs and may also manage closed-ended AIFs, subject to authorisation. SGIICs operate under a comprehensive risk, valuation and liquidity framework suited to open-ended strategies, including hedge funds. In practice, sponsors choose SGEIC for closed-ended programmes and SGIIC for open-ended platforms, although some groups maintain both licences for platform flexibility.

Manager licensing decisions consider AUM (assets under management) profiles, desired EU passporting, and whether a closed-ended or open-ended platform is contemplated.

Investment advisory functions can be performed by entities authorised to provide investment advice, often within the manager’s group. Advisory entities typically take the form of Spanish corporations and are subject to CNMV oversight where they provide regulated advice. Where advice is intra-group and provided to the licensed manager, advisory entities generally operate under contractual arrangements with clear delegation and oversight provisions to meet regulatory standards.

Registration and/or Approval Requirements

AIFs without legal personality (contractual fund form)

Contractual AIFs must appoint a licensed management company from inception to manage and represent the fund. For closed-ended contractual AIFs, no prior authorisation from the CNMV is required; incorporation is effected by executing the constitutive document (which may be a private document) and filing for administrative registration with the CNMV. Open-ended contractual AIFs require prior CNMV authorisation for incorporation and subsequent registration with the CNMV’s administrative register.

AIFs with legal personality (corporate form)

Corporate AIFs are incorporated as Spanish public limited companies (Sociedad Anónima or SA). They may either appoint an external AIFM from inception or operate as self-managed vehicles. Where the AIF is self-managed, prior CNMV authorisation is required before incorporation to verify adequate organisational, human and technical resources. If asset management is delegated to a duly authorised AIFM, that prior authorisation for the AIF as self-managed is not required, as the AIFM’s authorisation covers the management function.

In all cases, the deed of incorporation must be executed before a Spanish Notary. The deed must first be registered with the Mercantile Registry corresponding to the AIF’s registered office and then filed for administrative registration with the CNMV.

Key Required Documentation

A compliant offering document or prospectus (folleto informativo) with regulated content is required in all cases. For contractual AIFs, the prospectus is complemented by fund rules, management regulations or an LPA; for corporate AIFs, the by-laws are typically accompanied by investment terms and conditions that sit alongside the by-laws to address provisions not suitable for Mercantile Registry filing but mirroring the substantive terms found in fund regulations. Sustainability annexes are especially relevant where the AIF is classified under Articles 8 or 9 of the SFDR and should clearly set out the environmental or social characteristics or sustainable investment objectives and related disclosures.

Where units or shares of the AIF are marketed to retail investors, a key information document (KID) must accompany the offering materials.

Subscription agreements or commitment letters are also fundamental for closed-ended vehicles and should align with the governing documents on capital commitments, drawdowns, default provisions and transfer mechanics.

All governing and investor-facing documents must be published on the CNMV’s website and kept current; material changes generally require prior notification or approval, depending on their nature.

Other Relevant Information as to the Setting-Up Process in Spain

Where no prior CNMV authorisation is required, the process is generally streamlined and can be completed in approximately two to three months. Vehicles requiring prior CNMV authorisation should expect a longer timetable of roughly six to nine months. See 2.3.4 Regulatory Approval Process for more details.

CNMV fees are set and not typically the main cost driver. They include filing and registration fees for new vehicles, fees associated with authorisation reviews where applicable, and ongoing supervisory levies.

By contrast, professional advisory and service provider costs drive most of the budget. Depositary fees will vary based on asset type, custody complexity and valuation support needs, although there is a regulatory framework that limits these fees. Audit costs depend on portfolio composition, valuation policies and the number of entities within the structure. Legal and tax advisory fees are shaped by the fund’s investment strategy, investor negotiations (including side letters), cross-border elements and any bespoke structuring.

Spanish AIFs operate on a limited liability model for investors. In broad terms, an investor’s financial exposure is capped at the amount it has subscribed or committed. This principle aligns with the AIFMD framework, which places management, operational and safeguarding responsibilities on the authorised AIFM and the depositary, rather than on investors. As a result, third-party creditors of the fund generally have recourse only to the fund’s assets, and not to investors’ assets beyond their contractual obligations to the fund.

Where the AIF takes a corporate form, the Spanish Companies Act reinforces limited liability. Shareholders are not personally liable for corporate debts beyond their capital contribution and any outstanding, valid commitments.

Investors do not incur liability for the AIF’s debts or obligations provided they do not intervene in the management of the fund or its assets. The legal architecture under Law 22/2014 and the AIFMD places portfolio and risk management with the authorised manager. Passive investment, including exercising customary investor rights, receiving information, and participating in investor meetings or advisory committees, does not convert an investor into a manager or create additional liability. Similarly, serving on the board of a corporate AIF whose management is delegated can remain an oversight function. Liability risks arise if LPs step into de facto management, approve or direct specific investments, or otherwise exercise control over management functions.

Law 22/2014 sets out disclosure and reporting obligations for AIFMs and the AIFs they manage or market in Spain. The regime covers:

  • pre-contractual disclosures to investors;
  • ongoing investor reporting; and
  • regulatory reporting to the Spanish regulator (CNMV).

These requirements apply to:

  • Spanish AIFMs; and
  • non-EU/EU AIFMs managing and/or marketing AIFs in Spain.

Broadly, Spain follows AIFMD standards while supplementing them with local rules on format, timing and supervision.

Pre-Contractual Disclosures to Investors

Before any investment, AIFMs must provide a prospectus for each AIF they manage containing the fund’s constitutional documents and, at a minimum, clear information on:

  • investment strategy and policy;
  • the fund’s and underlying entities’ place of establishment (if fund‑of‑funds);
  • eligible assets, techniques and all associated risks;
  • investment restrictions; and
  • when and how leverage may be used (types, sources, limits, collateral/reuse and maximum leverage).

The prospectus must also explain:

  • how the strategy/policy can be changed;
  • the key legal terms of the investment relationship (jurisdiction, governing law, and judgment recognition/enforcement);
  • the identity and duties of the depositary, auditor and other service providers, and related investor rights;
  • how the manager covers professional liability risk;
  • any delegation of management or custody (who, what functions, and related conflicts);
  • valuation procedures and methodologies (including hard‑to‑value assets);
  • liquidity risk management and investor redemption rights in normal and exceptional circumstances;
  • all fees, charges and expenses (including maximums);
  • fair treatment of investors and any preferential treatment (its nature, who receives it, and any legal/economic ties);
  • issuance and sale procedures;
  • historical performance (if available);
  • the identity of any prime brokers/financing intermediaries;
  • the terms of those arrangements (conflict management, depositary permissions for transfer/reuse of assets, and any liability transfers); and
  • how and when the ongoing disclosures will be made.

Prospectus updates must be filed with the CNMV.

In addition, prior to investment, investors must be given the latest annual report, the most recent NAV or market price per interest, and any management delegation agreement. Managers must also prepare a PRIIPs Key Information Document (KID) under Regulation (EU) 1286/2014 and file KID updates with the CNMV.

Ongoing Investor Reporting

AIFMs must provide investors with periodic reports, including annual reports for each AIF they manage or market in Spain. The annual report shall comprise the annual financial statements (the financial year shall coincide with the calendar year), the management report, the audit report, any material changes in the information provided to unitholders or shareholders that occurred during the financial year covered by the report, and the remuneration information. In addition, the AIFMs must provide investors with periodic information, at least in the annual report, on:

  • the percentage of the AIF’s assets subject to special measures due to illiquidity; and
  • the fund’s actual risk profile and the risk management systems used by the manager.

They must also promptly inform investors of any new liquidity management measures, as well as any changes to the maximum leverage limit and rights to reuse collateral. For funds that use leverage, AIFMs must periodically inform investors, at least in the annual report, about changes to the maximum leverage the manager may employ on behalf of the fund, any rights to reuse collateral or guarantees, and the total leverage employed by the fund. These disclosures must comply with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 231/2013.

Regulatory Reporting to the CNMV

AIFMs must provide the CNMV with any information it requests, especially on the main markets and instruments traded on behalf of the AIF they manage, the markets of which they are members or in which they trade actively, and the principal exposures and concentrations of each managed AIF. The frequency, scope, and content of this reporting are set by the Minister of Economy and Competitiveness or, with the Minister’s express authorisation, by the CNMV. All this information enables the CNMV to monitor systemic risk.

For each AIF managed, AIFMs must report:

  • the percentage of the entity’s assets subject to special measures due to illiquidity;
  • any new liquidity management measures;
  • the entity’s effective risk profile and the risk management systems used to manage market, liquidity, counterparty, and other risks (including operational risk);
  • the main asset categories in which the entity has invested; and
  • the results of stress tests performed under applicable law.

The frequency, scope, and content are set by the relevant minister or, with authorisation, the CNMV.

In addition, they must provide the CNMV with:

  • the annual report for each EU investment entity managed and for each investment entity marketed in the EU by the AIFM for each financial year; and
  • before the end of each calendar quarter, a detailed list of all investment entities managed by the SGEIC.

AIFMs that manage AIFs that make substantial use of leverage must report the overall level of leverage for each entity, breaking down leverage arising from borrowing cash or securities and leverage embedded in derivatives, and indicating the extent to which the entity’s assets have been reused. This must include the identity of the five largest sources of cash or securities borrowing for each entity and the leverage obtained from each.

See 3.1.4 Disclosure Requirementsfor the disclosure requirements applicable to FILs.

Spanish law recognises three broad categories of investors: professional investors, elective professional investors and retail investors. See 2.3.7 Marketing of Alternative Funds for further detail.

Institutional capital has historically anchored the Spanish AIF market. Domestic insurance companies and pension funds, alongside international funds-of-funds, family offices, and wealth managers, are frequent cornerstone investors. Public sponsors have also been influential in catalysing fundraising, with national and European programmes supporting private equity and venture strategies. In practice, these institutional and quasi-public anchors have provided scale and credibility, particularly for first-time or sector-focused managers.

Retail participation has grown meaningfully, and managers increasingly tailor strategies and distribution to this segment. Appetite spans diversified private equity, private credit, infrastructure, and real assets. Recent reforms lowering the minimum subscription from EUR100,000 to EUR10,000 in certain cases – subject to suitability, diversification caps, and other investor-protection safeguards – have broadened access and deepened demand. Banks’ private banking networks and digital platforms have become important channels for these offerings to retail investors.

In Spain, AIFMs must take the form of a capital company. In practice, this means incorporation as either a public limited company (Sociedad Anónima, SA) or a private limited liability company (Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada, SL). Both corporate forms are governed by the Spanish Companies Act. Spanish AIFMs are authorised under one of two regulatory regimes, depending on the types of AIFs they manage. Closed-ended AIFs are managed by SGEICs authorised under Law 22/2014. Open-ended AIFs are managed by SGIICs authorised under the LIIC, which may also manage closed-ended AIFs.

Before commencing activities, Spanish AIFMs must obtain authorisation from and be registered with the CNMV. The process assesses programme of activity, governance, capital, risk, valuation, and delegation frameworks, as well as key function holders’ fitness and propriety. Once authorised, managers are subject to continuing supervision, including reporting, conduct of business standards, and oversight of delegation and outsourcing.

Spain applies a differentiated regime based on the investor’s status and the type of AIF and AIFM. See 2.3.7 Marketing of Alternative Funds for further details.

Spain’s AIFs are primarily governed by two pillars: Law 22/2014 (which regulates closed-ended collective investment entities and their managers) and the LIIC, which regulates open-ended schemes and their managers and is relevant for the broader supervisory architecture of Spain’s collective investment market.

Within Law 22/2014, ECR and ECR-PYMES are subject to mandatory investment ratios that require them to channel a minimum percentage of their computable assets (60%/75%, respectively) into eligible assets consisting of equity and equity-like instruments, as well as certain qualifying loans (notably, participative loans and other debt with equity-type features), issued by operating, non-financial and non-real estate companies, with a carve out for specific fintech business models. Spanish diversification rules for ECR/ECR-PYMES are stringent: generally, no more than 25% of the fund’s computable assets may be invested in a single issuer, and no more than 35% may be invested in entities belonging to the same group. These limits operate alongside the mandatory investment coefficients to shape portfolio construction and concentration in practice.

By contrast, EICC benefit from broad investment freedom and, unlike ECR/ECR-PYMES, are not subject to statutory diversification limits. That flexibility is balanced by distribution constraints: EICC cannot be marketed to retail investors in Spain and are squarely positioned as professional-only products. As a cross-cutting point, Spanish AIFs may opt into EU labels such as EuVECA, EuSEF or ELTIF. If a Spanish AIF elects one of these labels, it must comply with the applicable EU regime in addition to Spanish law, including the specific portfolio composition, eligible asset, leverage and marketing rules embedded in those regulations.

FILs enjoy broad investment latitude, including the use of derivatives, short sales, leverage and exposures to unlisted securities and complex instruments, but are constrained by product‑level rules. While not subject to UCITS‑style diversification ratios, CNMV practice requires adequate diversification, stress‑testing and limits on issuer and counterparty concentration commensurate with the strategy.

Service provider regulation in Spain follows the AIFMD framework as implemented in Law 22/2014 and the CNMV rules, with important local specificities. The depositary or custodian of a Spanish AIF must be an eligible entity and, as a matter of Spanish law and supervisory practice, must be established in Spain or act through an authorised Spanish branch. Eligible categories typically include credit institutions and, subject to the asset scope and safeguarding model, certain investment firms or other entities expressly permitted by Law 22/2014. Depositaries are subject to licensing/registration and ongoing CNMV oversight, including capital, organisational and liability requirements.

Fund administration per se is not a separately licensed activity under Spanish law when it comprises purely administrative back‑office tasks. However, if the AIFM delegates portfolio management or risk management to a third party (local or non‑local), that delegate must be appropriately authorised and the delegation must comply with AIFMD delegation rules, including due diligence, oversight, conflict management and “letter‑box” prohibitions.

External valuers, when appointed, must meet the professional competence, independence and liability standards set in Law 22/2014 and CNMV guidance; where the valuer is non‑local, AIFMD‑equivalent regulation, professional registration and co-operation arrangements are relevant to the CNMV’s assessment.

Statutory auditors of Spanish AIFs must be registered in Spain’s official auditors’ registry (ROAC) or operate under recognised EU frameworks that satisfy Spanish auditing standards and supervision.

Distributors that market AIF interests in Spain must be appropriately authorised (eg, investment firms or credit institutions) and registered with the CNMV; EU distributors may rely on passporting where applicable, subject to host‑state conduct and marketing rules.

Spanish law recognises two Spanish manager types for AIFs:

  • SGEIC under Law 22/2014 (for closed-ended AIFs); and
  • SGIIC under the LIIC (for opened-ended AIFs although it may also be authorised to manage closed‑ended AIFs).

This dual framework is important for structuring multi‑product platforms and for aligning manager permissions with fund typologies.

EU AIFMs may manage Spanish AIFs under the AIFMD management passport, either cross‑border without a branch or through an EU branch, following the standard home‑to‑host notification process; the CNMV will receive the notification and supervise host‑state aspects (including reporting and compliance with any Spanish product‑level or marketing‑level provisions).

For third‑country (non‑EU) managers, Spain requires prior authorisation to manage Spanish AIFs. In practice, many sponsors either appoint an EU‑authorised AIFM to manage the Spanish AIF or establish a locally authorised manager (SGEIC/SGIIC) to comply with Spanish law and ensure operational alignment with depositary, valuation and reporting requirements.

See 3.3.3 Local Regulatory Requirements for Non-Local Managers in connection with the local regulatory requirements for non-local managers of FILs (ie, open-ended AIFs).

Where no prior CNMV authorisation is required, the process is generally streamlined and can be completed in approximately two to three months from the point at which near-final regulatory documents are prepared. This category includes ECR, ECR-PYMES and EICC that are structured as funds (ie, without legal personality), as well as those organised as corporate vehicles that appoint an external AIFM to manage their assets. In these cases, there is no authorisation phase prior to constitution; instead, the vehicle must be registered with the CNMV before commencing operations. The two-to-three-month timeline typically covers execution of the incorporation document or deed, registry turnaround and CNMV administrative registration, assuming no substantial comments on the filing.

Vehicles requiring prior CNMV authorisation – open-ended AIFs (FIL) and self-managed corporate AIFs should expect a longer timetable of roughly six to nine months. This reflects the authorisation review, iterative rounds of information requests and comments from the CNMV, and the corresponding refinements to constitutional and offering documentation.

The upper end of each range is more likely where the strategy is novel, the structure is complex, there are cross-border features, or the governance and delegation model departs from CNMV market practice. Early alignment with the CNMV on any novel features and ensuring that the AIFM’s authorisation scope matches the proposed strategy can materially reduce review cycles.

Spain follows the EU “pre-marketing” regime introduced under the Cross-Border Distribution of Funds framework and integrated into the AIFMD. In Spain, the applicable domestic rules are found in:

  • Law 22/2014, for closed-ended AIFs; and
  • the LIIC, for open-ended AIFs.

Under this regime, “pre-marketing” covers activities by an EU AIFM that, without enabling subscriptions, test professional investor interest in an AIF. In Spain, pre-marketing is permitted exclusively to professional investors and must comply with the following rules, with the CNMV as the competent supervisory authority.

  • Pre-marketing may only be carried out by EU AIFMs themselves or through certain permitted intermediaries (such as investment firms, credit institutions, AIFMs or UCITS management companies, and their tied agents).
  • Materials provided during the pre-marketing phase cannot be sufficient to allow investors to commit to acquiring units or shares of an AIF. No final-form subscription documents may be provided, and no final-form offering documents or constitutional documents may be circulated; any drafts shared must clearly state that they are incomplete, not an offer, and subject to change. Term sheets, presentations and draft documents are generally permissible if they do not permit a subscription.
  • AIFMs must notify their home regulator within two weeks of beginning pre-marketing.
  • Any subscription by a professional investor within 18 months of the start of pre-marketing in Spain is deemed to be the result of marketing. Reverse solicitation cannot be used to circumvent this rule during that 18‑month period.
  • Pre-marketing to retail investors is not in scope; engaging with Spanish retail investors requires full marketing compliance (CNMV registration and retail disclosures).

Spain follows the EU “marketing” regime introduced under the AIFMD and transposed by means of:

  • Law 22/2014, for closed-ended AIFs; and
  • the LIIC, for open-ended AIFs.

The CNMV is the competent authority for notifications, approvals and ongoing supervision. Where marketing targets retail investors, additional Spanish conduct, advertising and facilities requirements apply.

Spanish law recognises three broad categories of investors in alternative investment funds (AIFs): professional investors, elective professional investors (retail clients who opt to be treated as professionals and meet regulatory criteria), and retail investors. Professional investors typically include financial institutions, insurance companies, pension funds, large corporates, sovereign or public agencies, and certain investment firms. Elective professional investors are individuals or entities that, after an assessment and appropriate disclosures, elect to be treated as professionals due to their experience, knowledge, and financial capacity. Retail investors comprise the remainder of the market and are generally subject to enhanced protection and suitability rules.

As a baseline, Spanish AIFs may be marketed to professional investors as defined under MiFID II. This includes per se professional clients as well as retail clients who validly elect to be treated as professionals under MiFID II’s opt‑in criteria.

Direct marketing of Spanish AIFs to retail investors is generally not permitted. The principal carve‑out allows retail access to the Spanish ECR, including ECR‑PYME, provided the fund is managed by a fully authorised AIFM.

Retail distribution is also possible for EU-labelled AIFs in line with their specific EU regulations (including in those cases where the AIFM is a sub-threshold AIFM). In Spain, this primarily covers EuVECA/FCRE, EuSEF/FESE and ELTIF/FILPE. Any retail offer of these funds must comply with the conditions in the relevant EU framework, together with Spanish conduct‑of‑business and marketing rules.

In Spain, the marketing regime for AIFs mirrors the AIFMD framework, including the EU passport for cross‑border marketing to professional investors and differentiated rules for non‑EU scenarios.

EU AIFs managed by EU AIFMs may be marketed in Spain to professional investors once the AIFM’s home authority notifies the CNMV and transmits a standardised file; the CNMV cannot ask for additional documents beyond the list in the law. The notification must include fund identification, marketing arrangements, constitutive documents, offering documents (where required), latest annual report, depositary details, and investor information. AIFs must also comply with Spain’s rules on marketing and advertising, supervised by the CNMV.

For non‑EU AIFs marketed by EU AIFMs, prior CNMV authorisation and registration are required, subject to co-operation agreements, FATF “non‑cooperative” checks, and tax information exchange – plus filing of fund and marketing documentation and a home‑state authorisation certificate. The CNMV may refuse authorisation on prudential, investor‑protection, or market‑order grounds. For non‑EU AIFMs, a similar prior authorisation, co-operation and equivalence regime applies before marketing to professionals in Spain, with ongoing information and conduct requirements supervised by the CNMV.

Firms that market AIFs in Spain have ongoing obligations to both investors and the CNMV. They must provide investors with an annual report, keep offering documents and the KID/PRIIPs KID up to date, and deliver these materials or make them available in the required language; updates must be sent to the CNMV. See 2.1.4 Disclosure Requirements for further details.

Marketing of AIFs is generally limited to professional investors. Retail access is the exception and is subject to strict safeguards such as appropriateness/suitability checks, enhanced risk disclosures, and investor warnings. Depositary oversight, valuation controls, and leverage monitoring apply as core protections.

There are specific retail restrictions for closed‑ended vehicles. Marketing to retail investors of EICC is not permitted. Likewise, ECR and ECR‑PYMES managed by a firm that is not a fully licensed AIFM cannot be marketed to retail investors.

For cross‑border marketing, EU AIFMs use the AIFMD passport to market to professionals in Spain and must follow Spanish conduct and disclosure rules. Retail marketing requires prior CNMV approval and adherence to Spanish product governance and disclosure standards. Non‑EU AIFMs face tighter entry conditions and are limited to professional investors, subject to CNMV clearance.

See 2.1.4 Disclosure Requirements for reporting obligations towards investors.

The CNMV takes a pragmatic and collaborative approach to supervising the AIF sector. In the authors’ experience, the CNMV is approachable, solutions‑oriented, and open to early engagement on novel structures or questions of interpretation. Interactions are generally constructive, with staff willing to discuss issues to pre‑empt avoidable friction during authorisation or ongoing compliance. While formal processes and documentation remain important, the overall tone is supportive of industry development consistent with investor protection and market integrity.

The CNMV is accessible for both face‑to‑face and telephone meetings, as well as virtual calls when preferred. It is common to arrange preliminary discussions to clarify expectations on filings, disclosures, or organisational requirements for AIFs and AIFMs. These meetings typically focus on practical implementation issues, allowing applicants to refine submissions and reduce iterative queries. The regulator is also receptive to follow‑up conversations where a matter raises technical or policy considerations.

The CNMV’s website is comprehensive and user‑friendly, bringing together core materials relevant to AIFs and AIFMs. Key resources include:

  • current regulations and supervisory guidance applicable to AIFs, AIFMs, and service providers;
  • public information on authorised AIFs, AIFMs, and other providers (such as depositaries and valuers), which supports due diligence and market benchmarking;
  • standardised templates and forms that streamline submissions and ongoing reporting; and
  • questions and answers that set out the CNMV’s interpretative positions on the regulatory framework and market principles, helping firms align practices with supervisory expectations.

The CNMV has also set up an electronic platform (CIFRADOC) to facilitate the exchange of documents and information with the AIFMs.

See 2.3.1 Regulatory Regime for the investment restrictions applicable to each type of AIF.

There are also regulations in place in connection with an AIF’s assets. A depositary must be appointed for each closed-ended AIF that is managed by a fully licensed AIFM (ie, with AUM exceeding the “sub‑threshold” limits). The depositary is governed by the LIIC framework for duties and liability.

There are also regulations related to risk, leverage/borrowing, valuation, conduct, transparency, and related safeguards which are aligned with AIFMD. AIFM must implement liquidity‑risk systems (for leveraged funds), perform periodic stress tests, and follow AIFMD risk standards; they must also ensure robust, consistent, and independent valuation procedures for each fund.

Spanish law does not set out statutory borrowing caps at vehicle level. In general, borrowing restrictions (if any) are contractually required by investors.

The AIF finance regime pivots on AIFMD-style disclosure/monitoring: the prospectus must set maximum leverage, permitted sources, and collateral arrangements, and annual reports must quantify leverage used.

Borrowings are often used to bridge capital calls through, up to 12-month revolving facilities. Lenders typically take security over capital-call rights and AIF collection accounts.

AIFs incorporated in Spain are generally subject to standard tax rules, however certain tax incentives apply depending on the AIF legal form, specifically in connection with ECRs.

Corporate Taxation

AIFs incorporated in Spain are corporate taxpayers subject to the standard 25% CIT (corporate income tax) rate regardless of their corporate or fund form. However, ECRs regulated under Law 22/2014 might be eligible for a 99% exemption on capital gains provided that the transfer occurs from the beginning of the second year of holding counted from the time of acquisition or exclusion from listing and up to the fifteenth year, inclusive. This exemption only applies whenever the capital gain is not eligible for the Spanish regular participation exemption.

The Spanish regular participation exemption is de facto 95% to the extent the dividends and capital gains eligible for the exemption are reduced by 5% to cover deductible management expenses related to the securities transferred. The requirements of the Spanish participation exemption are generally as follows.

  • Direct or indirect participation of at least 5%, held uninterruptedly for one year prior to distribution (holding period can be completed after the dividend receipt).
  • If the first-tier subsidiary derives more than 70% of its income from dividends/capital gains, the taxpayer must hold at least an indirect 5% in the underlying entities, which is calculated on consolidated results if the first-tier entity consolidates.
  • Subject-to-tax test (applicable to non-Spanish subsidiaries) – the subsidiary must be subject and not exempt to an analogous foreign tax at a nominal rate not lower than 10%. This requirement is deemed as met if the entity is resident in a treaty country with an information-exchange clause with Spain.
  • Dividends that generate a tax-deductible expense on the payer side do not qualify for the exemption (anti-hybrid rule).

Historically, the Spanish participation exemption resulted in a full exemption from capital gains, in this scenario the 99% fall-back exemption for qualifying ECRs was consistent – ie, where the 100% shelter was not available, the ECRs were still eligible for a substantial protection (99%). The current wording of the corporate tax law once the effective exemption has been reduced to 95% is, however, inconsistent since the standard and preferential regime for capital gains is less efficient than the fall-back protection (99%).

On dividends, the ECRs are entitled to apply 95% participation exemption regardless of the ownership period (otherwise one year) or the level of shareholding (otherwise minimum 5% required).

Other types of income obtained by the ECRs, such as interest, will be subject to the general Spanish CIT rate of 25%.

Spanish corporate taxpayers with a turnover not lower than EUR10 million are subject to the so-called minimum accounting prepayment, a corporate tax instalment (23% CIT rate) calculation method based on the accounting result where no exemptions can be applied. The mismatch between the final CIT calculation (when exemptions are available) and the instalments may generate material financial costs. However, Spanish ECRs are excluded from this calculation method (ie, corporate tax leakage on CIT prepayment should generally match the final CIT quota and therefore there is no financial cost associated).

The ECR corporate tax benefits are not available in case of income obtained through non-cooperative jurisdictions or if the acquirer is in such territories (these are listed in Order HFP/115/2023).

ECR Investors

Investors in AIFs are not generally granted a preferential tax regime. However, ECR investors benefit from the following incentives.

  • Spanish corporate taxpayers or Spanish non-residents with permanent establishment in Spain are eligible for participation exemption on dividends and capital gains regardless of the percentage of ownership and holding period.
  • Dividends and capital gains obtained by international investors would not be considered Spanish-sourced.

These tax incentives are not available if the income is obtained through non-cooperative jurisdictions or the acquirer is located in such territories.

Carried-Interest Regime for Managers

The characterisation of carried-interest income as employment or capital income has been controversial in the past. In 2022, the Personal Income Tax Law was amended introducing a clear tax treatment for carried interest obtained by certain AIF managers. Specifically, the law considers employment income amounts derived, directly or indirectly, from shares or other rights, including success fees, that grant special economic rights in any of the AIFs listed below, when obtained by the directors, managers or employees of those entities or of their management companies or group entities.

  • ECRs or ECR-PYMES.
  • EuVECAs.
  • EuSEFs.
  • ELTIFs.
  • Other investment vehicles that are analogous to the foregoing. While the Law does not specify which entities can be considered analogous, the administrative interpretation is that entities that are analogous from a regulatory perspective should be eligible for the tax incentive. This includes EU or third-territory vehicles.

Only 50% of the employment income originated from the instruments outlined will be subject to tax. The position of the Spanish tax authorities is that the withholding tax agent should consider only the 50% of the remuneration subject to tax – ie, there should be no withholding tax in excess of the final tax to be settled on these amounts by the taxpayer.

The following requirements must be met.

  • The special economic rights attached to such interests, shares or rights must be conditional upon the other eligible AIF investors obtaining a minimum return as defined in the entity’s regulations or by-laws.
  • The interests, shares or rights must be held for a minimum period of five years, unless they are transferred to mortis causa, or are redeemed early, terminated, or lost in whole or in part as a result of a change of management company, in which case they must be held continuously until such circumstances occur.

Additionally, the reduction will not apply where the special economic rights derive directly or indirectly from entities located in non-cooperative jurisdictions or with which there is no legal framework on mutual assistance in the exchange of tax information.

The tax authorities have specifically accepted the application of the tax incentive to bonuses payable to employees of the AIFM whenever related to the referred special economic rights.

Indirect Taxation

ECRs are not considered as entrepreneurs for Spanish VAT purposes provided their activity consists of passive holding of investments which should not constitute an economic activity for Spanish VAT purposes.

Specifically, administrative interpretation has ruled out the entrepreneur status for VAT purposes of an ECR incorporated as a fund (no legal personality and managed by the AIFM) but this cannot be extrapolated to ECRs incorporated as a corporation where factors different than legal status should be considered: organisation of human and material resources for activities different than passive holding of securities. In this regard, administrative practice has considered the ECRs – different than those incorporated as a fund – as entrepreneurs if performing financing activities (loans/profit participating loans) on a recurring basis.

Services granted by the AIFM to alternative funds are VAT exempt. While the VAT exempt status of the different services must be analysed on a case-by-case basis, the administrative interpretation has considered AIFM core activity as eligible for the exemption even in case it is subcontracted by the manager to parties different than AIFMs. Services which could be provided, from a regulatory perspective, by parties different than the AIFM should not qualify for the exemption.

Net Wealth Tax

Spanish individuals are subject to the Net Wealth Tax subject to certain thresholds. High-net-wealth individuals and families often manage investments from corporations provided with human and material resources of which ownership might qualify for Net Wealth Tax exemption subject to several requirements. This exemption is conditional to the active status of the corporation and any underlying investment.

Spanish ECRs have been considered as qualifying investments by the administrative interpretation and practice in multiple precedents. Specifically, the existence of the compulsory investment coefficient should characterise the ECR as a qualifying investment to the extent these securities are owned following a regulatory mandate. However, the non-compulsory investment percentage must be analysed considering the existence of human resources and the minimum shareholding required (5%). The ECR’s qualifying status would not apply in the period where the compulsory coefficient is not within, for example, the three-year grace period.

Capital Duty

ECRs are exempt from capital duty (contribution and capital reduction). Similarly, the contribution of equity to any regular corporation in Spain is capital-duty exempt.

Spain’s retail funds are governed by the Collective Investment Schemes Law (LIIC) and its implementing regulation. The market’s core retail products are financial UCITS set up either as funds without legal personality or as investment companies with variable capital, alongside a smaller real-estate retail fund segment under specific liquidity rules.

Principal Legal Vehicles for Retail Funds

Spanish UCITS take two main forms. A fondo de inversión (FI) is a separate pool of assets without legal personality, owned collectively by investors and managed and represented by a licensed management company with a depositary; investor returns depend on collective performance. A sociedad de inversión de capital variable (SICAV) is a public limited company whose share capital can increase or decrease within statutory limits through the company’s sale or purchase of its own shares at net asset value (NAV). Real-estate collective investment schemes (RE-IIC) are also recognised in fund and company form, investing mainly in urban real estate for lease under tailored liquidity and diversification rules.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Structure

  • FIs – advantages include operational simplicity (no legal personality but instead its manager (SGIIC) manages and represents the FI), ring-fenced compartments and unit classes, and limited investor liability to contributions. Potential disadvantages are full reliance on the manager and depositary governance framework and mandatory use of a depositary and manager.
  • SICAVs – advantages include corporate form, capital variability to provide liquidity at NAV, and optional listing or organised trading to facilitate liquidity. Disadvantages include corporate governance obligations, minimum shareholder thresholds, and the need to keep shares in treasury until placed.
  • RE-IIC – advantages are access to property exposure with a regulated liquidity and diversification framework; disadvantages include lower liquidity, with subscriptions/redemptions potentially limited (eg, annually) to match asset liquidity. They can be incorporated as funds or corporations.

In all cases, CNMV authorisation, ongoing disclosure (prospectus/KID and periodic reports), and depositary oversight promote investor protection but add regulatory cost and operational discipline.

Investors’ Interests

In funds, investors hold “participaciones” (units), which are the pro‑rata aliquots of the fund’s assets and may be issued in different classes. In SICAVs, investors hold “acciones” (shares), which may be issued in series and must be fully subscribed and paid up; minimum shareholders generally number 100.

Legal Vehicles for Investment Managers and Advisers

Retail funds are managed by SGIICs, which are Spanish corporations (SA or SL) with the exclusive object to manage investments, risk, administration, and subscription/redemption, acting with the diligence of a prudent manager and able to delegate under regulated conditions. SGIICs are authorised and supervised by the CNMV, must meet organisational, conduct, and audit requirements, and operate with an independent depositary safeguarding assets and monitoring the manager. UCITS management can also be performed on a cross‑border basis by EU management companies under passporting.

Investment advice to retail funds can be provided to the SGIIC or the fund through delegation frameworks, but delegation does not relieve the SGIIC of responsibility; advisory and distribution roles may be performed by licensed investment services firms pursuant to the UCITS/MiFID framework referenced in the law and regulation.

See 2.3.4 Regulatory Approval Process. The same process applicable for FILs (ie, opened-ended AIFs) applies to retail funds.

See 2.1.3 Limited Liability. Investors in retail funds enjoy limited liability when investing in retail funds following the same terms as described in the referenced section.

LIIC imposes specific disclosure and reporting obligations on UCITS – supervised by the CNMV – to ensure investor protection and transparency.

Pre-Contract Information and Key Documents

  • Prospectus and KID (PRIIPs) – UCITS must publish a prospectus and a key information document, plus annual and semi-annual reports, so all factors affecting value and risks are publicly known. The CNMV sets standardised models and requires prior registration of the prospectus and KID before marketing. The KID follows Regulation (EU) 1286/2014.
  • Delivery to investors before subscription – free prior delivery of the KID and latest semi-annual report, and on request the prospectus and latest annual report, which may be provided on a durable medium or via the fund/manager website and with paper upon request. For online subscriptions, CNMV guidance requires website availability, pre-access before subscribing, and investor acknowledgement systems.

Periodic Reporting

  • Annual, semi-annual (and optional quarterly) reports – content includes net assets, units, NAV per unit, portfolio and movements.
  • Publication deadlines – periodic reports must be published and delivered to investors within one month after period end. Audited annual accounts are published separately within four months and delivered within one month after preparation.
  • CNMV record-keeping and filings – all documents must be sent to the CNMV simultaneously with public release to keep registers updated; the prospectus and KID require prior CNMV registration. The CNMV maintains registers for prospectuses, periodic reports, audits, and KIDs.

Event Driven Disclosures and Material Changes

  • Significant events (hechos relevantes) – immediate communication to the CNMV and public dissemination of any event that may materially affect an investor’s decision or the NAV (eg, >20% redemptions), with later inclusion in the next periodic report.
  • Prior notice of key modifications – substantial changes (eg, investment policy, fees, manager/depositary changes, and valuation frequency) require prior notice to investors of at least 30 calendar days and an updated prospectus/KID upon effect.
  • Language of disclosures – prospectus and reports may be in Spanish, a common financial language, or another CNMV-admitted language. The KID and its updates must be in Spanish or another CNMV-admitted language.

Marketing, Transparency and Website

  • Marketing communications – must be consistent with mandatory disclosures; the CNMV’s circular on advertising applies (eg, performance scenarios for forward-looking data).
  • Website availability – UCITS must keep electronic copies of cross-border marketing documents on the website indicated to host state authorities; Spanish rules also require up-to-date online versions of the prospectus and KID on the manager/fund website.
  • CNMV supervision – the CNMV can require additional periodic information (eg, on investment limits) and set the form, content and timing of submissions.

Spanish law recognises three broad categories of investors:

  • professional investors;
  • elective professional investors; and
  • retail investors.

See 2.3.7 Marketing of Alternative Funds for further detail.

Investor appetite for UCITS in Spain is strong and predominantly shaped by bank-led distribution, a preference for conservative risk profiles, and tax-efficient switching within eligible domestic funds. Demand is cyclical: after years of low rates favouring mixed and global equity funds, 2023–2025 flows pivoted toward fixed income and capital-preserving solutions as yields rose.

Spanish retail investors value liquidity, capital preservation, and simplicity. Fixed income UCITS – especially short-duration, money market, and target-return/guaranteed funds – are popular in the current rate environment. Passive UCITS (including ETFs) are growing from a low base, while sustainability-themed UCITS attract interest where performance and fees are competitive. Funds-of-funds and discretionary portfolio solutions remain common.

See 2.2.2 Legal Structures Used by Fund Managers.

Retail funds can be subscribed to by retail investors as well as by professional and elective professional investors.

Spain’s retail funds are primarily governed by the LIIC and the RIIC, which also regulate managers (SGIIC) and are relevant for the broader supervisory architecture of Spain’s collective investment market. This Spanish legislation is based on the UCITS Directive.

See 2.3.2 Requirements for Non-Local Service Providers.

For UCITS, management by non-local UCITS managers is possible via the cross-border passport under the UCITS Directive which has been transposed in Spain by means of the LIIC. Thus, a UCITS ManCo (management company) authorised in another EU member state may manage a Spanish IIC (including FIs, SICAVs and RE-IICs) via a branch or LPs under the UCITS passport. Spain cannot require an extra authorisation or local domicile, beyond receipt by the CNMV of the home state notification and documentation. Such managers must comply with Spanish conduct rules, information duties, CNMV supervision, and (when acting under LPs) appoint a Spanish tax representative.

Non-EU ManCos wishing to manage UCITS incorporated in Spain will require prior CNMV authorisation and compliance with conditions, including appointment of a Spanish legal representative, effective supervisory co-operation agreements, FATF non‑blacklisting, and adequate tax information exchange with Spain. The CNMV may deny or condition authorisation on prudential/equivalence grounds and protection of investors/market discipline.

UCITS require prior CNMV authorisation and should expect a timetable of roughly three to six months. This reflects the authorisation review, iterative rounds of information requests and comments from the CNMV, and the corresponding refinements to constitutional and offering documentation.

Spain’s “pre‑marketing” regime applies only to AIFs, not to UCITS. Under the LIIC, pre‑marketing is expressly defined and permitted for IICs other than UCITS (ie, FILs) managed under the AIFMD framework.

The marketing in Spain of units/shares of UCITS authorised in another EU member state is “free” once the CNMV receives the home‑state notification with the standard UCITS documentation (notification letter, fund rules/constitutive documents, prospectus, latest annual/semi‑annual reports, KIID/KID, and the UCITS attestation). No additional documentation may be required by the CNMV. UCITS must also comply with Spanish rules outside the UCITS Directive (eg, advertising). Marketing must be conducted through authorised intermediaries and under the conditions of the LIIC and Spanish investment services law. The Spanish CNMV registration number must appear in all documents and advertising disseminated in Spain. The CNMV supervises compliance with this marketing law, may request periodic statistical/supervisory information on the marketing of foreign IICs in Spain, and will set the form and timing of such reporting.

The following entities may market UCITS in Spain (authorised financial intermediaries as defined in the LIIC).

  • A Spanish SGIIC may market the IICs it manages and, where applicable, other IICs if it has included the activity in its programme and filed the required prior activity declaration with the CNMV under the RIIC.
  • Duly authorised investment firms or credit institutions (which will not act as SGIIC agents). Distribution must observe suitability/appropriateness rules under Spanish securities law for advised or non-advised sales by the intermediaries marketing the UCITS.
  • For UCITS managed/marketed by an EU ManCo under a passport, if the ManCo itself markets in Spain without a branch, that activity is subject to the LIIC (UCITS passport marketing), including identification in the notification that the ManCo will also market the UCITS.

UCITS can be marketed to any investor in Spain (regardless of whether the investor is professional, elected professional or retail). The LIIC expressly provides that UCITS from another member state marketed in Spain are subject to the LIIC, without client-type restrictions.

The marketing of UCITS requires either authorisation by the CNMV (granted prior to incorporation) and its subsequent recording at the CNMV’s administrative registry or acquisition of a European marketing passport under the UCITS Directive (if the UCITS has been incorporated in another jurisdiction).

There are annual and semi-annual reporting requirements for managers of retail funds. The reports need to be published. See 3.1.4 Disclosure Requirements for further details.

There is a single information regime for the marketing of Spanish IICs that does not distinguish between professional and retail investors, which reinforces that the rules do not restrict UCITS to professionals. Before subscription, the prospectus, reports, and the PRIIPs-KID must be delivered in accordance with the LIIC.

See 2.3.11 Approach of the Regulator.

FI

Permitted activities and investments

These funds primarily invest in liquid, transferable securities and money market instruments. They follow diversification and concentration limits to reduce single‑issuer and sector risk. Use of derivatives is allowed for hedging and efficient portfolio management, with tight controls on exposure and counterparty risk.

Asset safeguarding

An independent depositary must be appointed. The depositary is an authorised institution that safeguards assets, oversees cash flows, and monitors compliance with investment and valuation rules. Client assets are segregated from the manager’s own assets to protect investors on insolvency.

Risk, borrowing, valuation and conduct

Risk management must cover market, liquidity, counterparty and operational risks, with stress testing and liquidity monitoring.

Borrowing is tightly restricted and typically only temporary for liquidity.

Valuation follows transparent, pre‑agreed policies; pricing is at fair value and applied consistently to subscriptions and redemptions.

Insider dealing, market abuse, and conflicts are addressed through internal controls and staff dealing policies.

Transparency includes a key investor disclosure and periodic reports.

Robust anti‑money laundering procedures are mandatory. Short selling is generally indirect (via derivatives) and subject to risk limits.

SICAV

Permitted activities and investments

SICAVs are corporate vehicles that invest in financial assets. When offered to retail investors, their portfolio and leverage rules align with retail fund (FI) norms, often mirroring type diversification and liquidity standards. They may be self‑managed or appoint a licensed management company (a SGIIC).

Asset safeguarding

A regulated depositary is required to safeguard assets, oversee cash and verify ownership and valuation processes. Asset segregation principles apply equally to SICAVs.

Risk, borrowing, valuation and conduct

Governance is through a board with clear oversight of risk, valuation and conflicts. Borrowing and leverage follow retail limits. Derivatives use is controlled and collateralised.

Valuation policies must be documented, independent, and consistently applied to NAV and dealing.

Market abuse, insider dealing, and AML rules apply. Investor reporting mirrors retail fund (FI) standards.

RE-IIC

Permitted activities and investments

These funds invest mainly in income‑producing real estate and related assets. Development activity is typically limited or subject to caps. Diversification often applies by asset, geography and tenant to manage concentration and vacancy risk.

Asset safeguarding

A qualified depositary should also be appointed. For real assets, the depositary performs oversight and ownership verification, while custody of financial instruments remains with eligible custodians. Titles may be held directly or via SPVs, with records and cash flows monitored.

Risk, borrowing, valuation and conduct

Independent property appraisals should be conducted on a regular schedule, with interim updates for material events.

Borrowing is permitted but capped to manage refinancing and interest‑rate risk; liquidity tools (gates, notice periods, and redemption windows) are used, given asset illiquidity.

Clear valuation and pricing policies, disclosure of NAV and appraisal bases, and enhanced liquidity risk management applies.

AML controls and market abuse rules are relevant (in the latter case where listed instruments are used).

Accessibility to Borrowing

  • FIs may borrow on a limited basis to manage short term liquidity (eg, settlement or temporary cash shortfalls). This is a recognised tool but tightly constrained in duration and size. Prospectuses must also ensure an adequate liquidity buffer to honour redemptions.
  • SICAVs follow the same rules, with a small additional allowance tied to immovable assets (see “Restrictions on Borrowings” below).
  • RE-IICs can access acquisition financing secured on properties, which is a standard feature of the product.

Restrictions on Borrowings

  • FIs – aggregate borrowing capped at 10% of assets must be used to resolve transitory treasury difficulties and generally for no longer than one month. Taking on debt for other purposes is restricted. Disclosure thresholds apply when third‑party obligations exceed 5% of NAV.
  • SICAVs – may also borrow for indispensable real estate used for operations, but total indebtedness cannot exceed 15% of assets.
  • RE-IICs – external debt must not exceed 50% of NAV. Additionally, they may incur up to 10% of assets for temporary liquidity needs (up to 18 months).

Security Package

  • FIs/SICAVs – portfolio assets generally cannot be pledged or used as collateral, save for securing market transactions and certain derivatives margining. Assets must remain under depositary custody. This limits classic collateralised fund‑level lending.
  • RE-IICs – lenders typically take mortgages over properties. The regime expressly contemplates mortgage‑backed acquisition and refurbishment financings.

Common Issues in Retail Fund Finance

  • Borrowing must be consistent with redemption/liquidity duties and disclosed liquidity coefficients. Mismatches can trigger supervisory scrutiny.
  • For FIs and SICAVs, debt is short-term and purpose-bound (treasury/settlement), requiring tight cash flow controls.
  • Inability to pledge the portfolio (beyond limited exceptions) narrows security options for lenders to FIs/SICAVs.
  • Exceeding 5% of third-party obligations requires market disclosure. Prospectuses should set out borrowing conditions and any CNMV-imposed constraints.

Corporate Taxation

Retail funds are eligible for a 1% corporate tax rate subject to certain requirements.

SICAVs

  • Minimum shareholders’ base of 100 – in order to factor in the investors’ base, only the following shareholders are eligible:
    1. shareholders investing at least EUR2,500 (by NAV at acquisition); and
    2. for umbrella SICAVs, shareholders with at least EUR12,500 invested.
  • The minimum investors’ base must be met for at least three quarters of the fiscal year.
  • Exceptions to these counting rules include investment companies of hedge-fund type, vehicles whose shareholders are exclusively other eligible UCITS (eg, master-feeder structures), and index-tracking-listed SICAVs.

FIs

  • Minimum unitholders base of 100 generally, subject to category-specific regulatory thresholds (eg, certain hedge-fund categories may require fewer, such as 25).

RE-IIC (non-developers)

  • Minimum investors’ base of generally 100 (shareholders/unitholders).
  • Exclusive purpose – investment in urban real estate for leasing.
  • Holding period – real-estate assets must not be transferred three years before acquisition, unless the CNMV authorises an exception.
  • Early disposal regularisation – if assets are sold early without authorisation, the disposal gain is taxed at 25%, and the entity must pay back the difference between 25% and 1% applied to prior years’ income from the asset, plus interest (and, where applicable, surcharges/penalties).

RE-IICs that develop housing for rent (developers)

  • Must meet all the non-developer RE-IIC requirements above.
  • Exclusive development activity – only residential units for leasing.
  • Development assets must not exceed 20% of total assets.
  • Maintaining separate accounting per property, with adequate breakdown by dwelling/unit.
  • Developed properties must be leased or offered for lease for at least seven years from construction completion (evidenced by the final works certificate).
  • If assets are sold before the minimum holding periods (three years for acquired; seven years for developed), the same 25% taxation on the disposal applies and payback of 25%–1% difference on prior years’ income from the asset, plus interest (and potential surcharges/penalties).

Similarly to ECRs, UCITS are not subject to the minimum corporate tax accounting prepayment. However, considering that UCITS are subject to 1% CIT, the same are not entitles to apply the Spanish PEX regime (participation exemption regime).

Payment of dividends to UCITS by Spanish entities are subject to 19% withholding tax; the difference between the withholding tax rate and the 1% CIT quota is refunded upon final corporate tax settlement.

UCITS under the Directive 2009/65/EC are exempt from Spanish-sourced dividends and capital gains but the exemption cannot lead to a lower taxation than the one that would have applied to local UCITS (1%). This protection is also available for UCITS located in the European Economic Area, provided that those states have concluded with Spain a tax treaty with an information exchange clause or an agreement for the exchange of information in tax matters.

While the letter of the law does not refer to UCITS out of the EU regulations umbrella, the Spanish courts have created a solid trend towards expansion to third-territories’ analogous UCITS based on protection offered by Article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (free movement of capital).

Investors’ Tax Regime

Spanish individuals are eligible for a roll-over regime when proceeds obtained upon transfer or redemption of securities in UCITS are reinvested in these vehicles. The new securities keep the historic tax basis and acquisition date of the transferred/redeemed stake. The roll-over regime is denied if the individual obtains by any means cash from the transfer or redemption.

Spanish corporate taxpayers are neither entitled to apply the Spanish PEX regime nor tax credits to avoid double taxation on profits obtained from UCITS.

Profits distributed by UCITS to non-resident investors are considered Spanish-sourced and subject to withholding tax under the general tax rules for non-resident investors (protection subject to the corresponding double tax treaty with Spain).

Indirect Taxation

Similarly to ECRs, UCITS are generally not considered as entrepreneurs for VAT purposes, and management services granted to UCITS are VAT-exempt.

Capital Duty

Capital contributions made to UCITS are exempt from Capital Duty. While there are specific exemptions for certain UCITS, they should benefit from the general Capital Duty exemption.

In addition to the above, RE-IICs can benefit from a 95% tax relief in Transfer Tax and Stamp Duty on the acquisition of dwellings to lease subject to compliance with certain requirements.

For AIFs, the most consequential change on the horizon is the transposition of “AIFMD II” into Spanish law, which remains pending. Market participants are preparing for new rules on delegation, liquidity risk management, data reporting, and loan-originating fund regimes, alongside continued emphasis on investor protection and transparency. ELTIF 2.0, already applicable at EU level, is catalysing structures aimed at professional and, in some cases, retail investors, with Spain seeing growing interest in real assets and private credit access vehicles.

Liquidity risk management remains a standing priority, with managers refining stress testing, swing pricing or anti‑dilution measures, and disclosure of liquidity profiles.

ESG remains prominent: managers are aligning product design and naming with evolving EU guidance to mitigate “greenwashing” risk, while streamlining SFDR disclosures and periodic reporting. Experts are following the legislative process of the yet-to-be-approved SFDR II.

The CNMV has presented a plan to simplify supervisory actions with the aim of reducing by 50% certain types of information that supervised entities must provide in their periodic reports. The simplification plan should be implemented during 2026 and contains 31 concrete initiatives that combine actions to optimise internal CNMV procedures with proposals to amend CNMV circulars, with the goal of moving toward a more agile and proportionate risk-based supervision and reducing unnecessary burdens. None of these initiatives will have an impact on investor protection.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Tax & Legal, S.L.

Avenida Diagonal 640
Barcelona 08017

Paseo de la Castellana 259B
Madrid 28046
Spain

+34 932 532 700/+34 915 684 400

+34 934 059 032

ana.torres.g@pwc.com www.pwc.es
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



PricewaterhouseCoopers Tax & Legal, S.L. is the legal firm of PwC Spain, with significant depth and range of resources across five continents, including those focused on the investment management sector. The firm’s professionals think big and anticipate regulatory challenges and risks that could affect clients’ business. As a leading tax and legal adviser, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) stands out not only in size – the largest law firm and tax advisory practice – but also in the scope and reputation of its services. Backed by a seamlessly connected international network, the firm is able to support investment fund clients, helping them make the best decisions for their business and offering them a holistic approach during the full fund life cycle, from structuring and formation to marketing, operations and transactions. PwC provides ongoing or project-based legal and tax services. The firm is ranked in multiple Guides by Chambers and Partners, including Global, Europe, and NewLaw.

Navigating Spain’s New Funds Regime: AIFMD II, ELTIF 2.0 and ESG Enforcement

Background

Spain’s investment funds landscape is undergoing a decisive legal recalibration as European-level reforms reach implementation and domestic rules converge on a more facilitative, yet closely supervised, framework. The following are shifting market practice for managers (both alternative and retail fund managers):

  • combined potential effect of AIFMD II (Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive – yet to be implemented in Spain);
  • the revised ELTIF (European Long-Term Investment Fund) regime;
  • the product and market guidance of ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority) and the Spanish authority (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores, CNMV); and
  • Spain’s post‑stock exchange regulation reform (Ley 6/2023, de 17 de marzo, de los Mercados de Valores y de los Servicios de Inversión).

Managers of Spanish funds or passporting EU products into Spain are encountering a regulatory environment that is both more prescriptive in targeted areas and more permissive in others. Prescriptiveness is manifest in new hard‑wired limits for loan‑originating AIFs (Alternative Investment Funds), enhanced product naming constraints, expanded reporting, and stricter standards for retail marketing. Permissiveness appears in the liberalisation of ELTIFs for semi‑professional and retail distribution, streamlined passporting processes, and a clearer path for professional‑only strategies that had been constrained by former Spanish marketing limitations. The CNMV continues to prioritise investor protection and marketing fairness while embracing EU‑led initiatives intended to mobilise long‑term capital, including for private credit, infrastructure, real assets and growth equity.

Against this backdrop, fund sponsors should be attentive to the legal pivot points that are reshaping structuring choices and investor outreach in Spain. These include the implications of AIFMD II for EU and non‑EU management companies engaging with Spanish investors, the practical advantages of ELTIF 2.0 as a pan‑European wrapper with growing CNMV familiarity, the evolving ESG rulebook that directly affects product design and communications, and the operational doctrines the CNMV is applying to governance, delegation and oversight. Each of these trends present concrete, near‑term decisions for funds operating in or targeting the Spanish market.

Loan‑originating AIFs become mainstream under AIFMD II – with Spanish nuances

AIFMD II is yet to be implemented in Spain. The formalisation of loan‑originating AIFs under AIFMD II will directly impact private credit and direct lending strategies. Spain’s legal environment already accommodates lending strategies through EICCP (Entidad de Inversión Colectiva de tipo Cerrado de Préstamos – Closed-End Collective Investment Entity for Loans) or FIL (free investment schemes) in the alternative funds spectrum (see the Spain Law and Practice chapter of this gyide for more detail), but EU‑level harmonisation imposes uniform constraints that Spain must translate into practical fund terms and offering documents. The new regime introduces legally binding requirements on risk retention, leverage, credit policies, borrower concentration, and conflict management. These requirements are not merely policy guidance; they will be embedded in the funds’ documentation, delegation agreements and investor communications reviewed and approved by the CNMV for Spanish vehicles and considered in marketing filings for inbound EU products.

In practice, sponsors should expect the CNMV to focus on the robustness of loan origination and servicing policies, including underwriting criteria, valuation of credit exposures, and governance over restructurings. The leverage cap applicable to loan‑originating AIFs, coupled with retention obligations for loan transfers, will drive structuring choices around finance lines, NAV facilities and syndication. The Spanish legislative power is currently drafting provisions that operationalise these limits, including formula‑based leverage tests, board‑level approvals for exceptions, and reporting commitments that align with AIFMD II transparency.

Where Spanish borrowers are concerned, fund documents should anticipate domestic law enforcement pathways, inter-creditor norms and consumer credit exposures if retail borrowers are within scope.

Finally, marketing to Spanish professional investors has improved in predictability. Law 22/2014 (Ley 22/2014, de 12 de noviembre, por la que se regulan las entidades de capital-riesgo, otras entidades de inversión colectiva de tipo cerrado y las sociedades gestoras de entidades de inversión colectiva de tipo cerrado, y por la que se modifica la Ley 35/2003, de 4 de noviembre, de Instituciones de Inversión Colectiva) reassures institutional LPs (limited partners) and their compliance regime. Yet the CNMV will scrutinise any “semi‑professional” or elective professional classifications, particularly if leveraged private credit strategies are marketed beyond core institutions. Clear investor eligibility definitions and suitability processes are therefore becoming a central legal design feature in offering documents targeting Spain.

ELTIF 2.0 catalyses long‑term capital – retail access with guardrails

The revised ELTIF regime has transformed a niche product into a mainstream pan‑European wrapper for illiquid assets, and Spain is experiencing the practical implications of this change. The removal of the EU‑level minimum investment, the broader eligible asset set, and more flexible portfolio composition have unlocked the potential for ELTIFs to channel Spanish savings into private markets. For sponsors, the legal focus has shifted from “can we?” to “how do we safely and compliantly?” – particularly when structuring retail‑oriented ELTIFs that will be marketed under the Spanish retail rules and MiFID II product governance.

From a Spanish legal perspective, the decisive issues are investor protection and distribution arrangements. The CNMV will expect a clearly articulated liquidity framework consistent with ELTIF rules, including redemption gates or periodic liquidity mechanisms if offered. Disclosures must clearly present liquidity mismatch risks, valuation frequency, and the operation of any matching facilities. Marketing materials in Spain must be consistent with the KID (Key Information Document – where applicable) and the fund prospectus and must respect CNMV guidance on performance presentation, risk emphasis and the fair, clear and not misleading standard.

Spanish distributors play a critical role when ELTIFs are aimed at retail or mass affluent channels. Distribution agreements should allocate responsibility for target market assessments, appropriateness and suitability checks, and complaint handling. Spain is seeing heightened attention to inducement and value‑for‑money aspects in distribution remuneration, in line with broader EU retail investor protection trends. Distributors must have product governance processes calibrated to ELTIFs’ illiquid nature, and sponsors should ensure that Spanish‑language materials reflect the complexity and cost profile in a way that is intelligible to all non‑professional investors.

Operationally, depositary oversight and valuation policies for ELTIFs with Spanish assets require careful Spanish‑law mapping. Real estate, infrastructure concessions, and private equity holdings located in Spain may involve Spanish‑law valuations, appraisals and title searches. The CNMV is alert to independence in valuation providers and to potential conflicts where affiliates contribute to appraisals or development management. Where a Spanish ELTIF vehicle is used, Spanish regulatory approval timelines and ongoing CNMV reporting should be built into the launch plan. Where a non‑Spanish EU ELTIF is passported into Spain, the marketing notification process has become more predictable, but sponsors should still budget time for translations and distributor onboarding controls.

ESG after the enforcement turn – naming, greenwashing and product design

ESG funds in Spain are now navigating the post‑enforcement phase. Supervisors at both EU and Spanish levels have pivoted from initial implementation of SFDR (sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector – the Disclosure Regulation) and taxonomy disclosures to active supervision of fund names, marketing narratives, exclusions, and sustainability claims. ESMA’s guidelines on fund names using ESG‑related terms, together with the CNMV’s own communications on greenwashing risks, are reshaping product design and branding strategies for funds sold in Spain. The legal task for sponsors is to ensure that fund documentation, investment processes, and marketing materials are consistent, measurable and defensible.

The immediate legal effect is visible in pre‑contractual disclosures and investment policies. Funds using sustainability‑related terminology in their names must meet specific asset composition thresholds or adopt exclusions aligned with supervisory expectations. Spanish filings increasingly include minimum sustainable investment commitments, and governance safeguards for data quality. Where data coverage is partial or estimates are used, disclosures must be proportionate: if a sustainability claim can be quantified, it should be; if it cannot, the fund should avoid overstating its ESG impact. Cross‑references between the prospectus, website disclosures and periodic reports must remain consistent over time. Sponsors should implement internal ESG governance frameworks that demonstrably link investment decisions to disclosed objectives, including protocols for investee companies.

Finally, Spanish institutional investors, including pension plans and insurance groups, are embedding SFDR alignment into mandates and side letters. This contractual layer adds enforceability beyond public disclosures. Management companies marketing to Spain should anticipate bespoke covenants around PAIs (Principal Adverse Impact disclosures, under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR)), exclusions (for example, thermal coal and unconventional oil and gas), and periodic reporting metrics. Side letters must be harmonised with fund‑level commitments to avoid unequal treatment and potential conflicts with MFN (most favoured nation) clauses. The legal trend is towards fewer, more precise ESG promises that can withstand supervisory review and investor audit.

Marketing, delegation and operational oversight – the CNMV’s supervisory priorities

Operational governance is at the forefront of the CNMV’s current supervisory programme. Three vectors stand out: marketing discipline, delegation oversight and depositary effectiveness. Each has practical consequences for both domestic Spanish funds and inbound EU funds passported for marketing in Spain.

On marketing discipline, the CNMV continues to police the “fair, clear and not misleading” standard with enhanced expectations around performance advertising, risk balancing and the treatment of costs. For retail‑facing materials, Spanish rules mandate prominence for risks and costs. Social‑media and digital campaigns are being reviewed with the same strictness as traditional channels. For AIFs marketed to professionals, marketing reviews focus on the accuracy of strategy descriptions, liquidity representations and leverage disclosures.

Delegation is receiving renewed scrutiny aligned with EU‑level concerns about “letter‑box” entities. Spanish management companies are expected to demonstrate substantive decision‑making and oversight when delegating portfolio or risk management. Legal documentation is evolving to include more granular reporting obligations, rights of information, periodic reviews and the manager rights to recover the delegated functions in the best interest of the investors. For cross‑border passported funds, Spanish counsel is advising on the interface between home‑state supervisory expectations and CNMV inquiries. Ensuring that Spanish‑distributed products can evidence genuine substance at the management company level despite delegation is key.

Depositary performance is another focus. The CNMV is interested in escalation protocols, anomaly detection and remediation timelines. Depositary agreements are being refreshed to codify incident reporting, thresholds for materiality, and co-operation during valuations in stressed conditions. For alternative assets prevalent in Spain – real estate, infrastructure and private debt – the depositaries are expected to understand asset‑class specifics and to maintain competent oversight over title verification, cash monitoring and ownership records. Contractually, sponsors are tightening SLAs, clarifying liability caps within the permissible regulatory perimeter, and defining information flows to avoid gaps during corporate actions, restructurings or enforcement events.

Carried-interest tax regime

On 21 December 2022, Law 28/2022 for the promotion of the ecosystem of emerging companies (also known as the “Start-Up Law”) was approved, providing for a specific tax treatment of certain carried-interest income in the common territory of Spain to align its tax treatment with those in other EU countries. These legal provisions came into force in January 2023.

Pursuant to these newly approved regulations, qualified carried interest earned by a certain category of individuals is deemed to be employment income for Spanish personal income tax purposes, but 50% of such income is excluded from the tax base provided that certain requirements are met.

  • The qualified carried interest is income derived directly or indirectly from units, shares or other rights, including success fee, that grant special economic rights to their holders – being directors, managers or employees of any of the entities considered as qualifying vehicles according to the Start-Up Law (ECR, ECR-Pymes, EuVECA, EuSEF, ELTIF or other analogous vehicles) (“Qualifying Vehicles”) or its AIFM or entities belonging to their group.
  • The special economic rights of the units, shares or rights are conditioned to the remaining investors in the Qualifying Vehicles obtaining a minimum return defined in the LPA (limited partnership agreement)/informative prospectus.
  • The units, shares or rights in the Qualifying Vehicles must be held (by its direct holders) for a minimum period of five years, unless mortis causa transfer occurs or if they are liquidated in advance or are without effect or are totally or partially lost as a result of a change of AIFM, in which case, they must have been maintained uninterruptedly until said date.
  • This special tax relief shall not apply when the special economic rights come directly or indirectly from an entity resident in a country or territory classified as a non-cooperative jurisdiction or with which there is no regulation on mutual assistance regarding the exchange of tax information.

Secondary transactions

Secondary deals have become a core portfolio-management lever to release cash, manage duration and reset value-creation plans without selling the asset outright. Managers are leaning into GP-led (general partner) transactions (continuation funds for high-conviction assets), strip sales, tender-offer solutions and preferred-equity/NAV-based structures to deliver liquidity to existing LPs while preserving upside through rollover exposure.

Liquidity without disposals

AIFs are increasingly obtaining liquidity without selling assets by using dividend recapitalisations and adjacent tools. At the portfolio-company level, a dividend recap typically involves raising new debt (or upsizing existing term facilities) and upstreaming the proceeds as a dividend to the fund, which can then distribute to LPs or rebalance capital across the portfolio. It converts embedded equity value into cash while maintaining control and future upside.

Beyond dividend recaps, managers are also using preferred equity at the fund or holding entity level, and structured liquidity lines to bridge distributions. Properly sequenced, these tools provide liquidity without forced disposals, preserving strategic flexibility while aligning with investor expectations on pacing.

Conclusion

The Spanish funds market is being shaped by EU‑driven harmonisation coupled with domestic supervisory pragmatism. Governance policies, delegation frameworks, depositary agreements, and valuation manuals are now front‑line legal documents that determine regulatory outcomes as much as the prospectus itself. Marketing teams and distributors in Spain must internalise the evolving ESG and digital asset expectations to ensure that campaigns are compliant at first publication. Spain is open for sophisticated fund business.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Tax & Legal, S.L.

Avenida Diagonal 640
Barcelona 08017

Paseo de la Castellana 259B
Madrid 28046
Spain

+34 932 532 700/+34 915 684 400

+34 934 059 032

ana.torres.g@pwc.com www.pwc.es
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



PricewaterhouseCoopers Tax & Legal, S.L. is the legal firm of PwC Spain, with significant depth and range of resources across five continents, including those focused on the investment management sector. The firm’s professionals think big and anticipate regulatory challenges and risks that could affect clients’ business. As a leading tax and legal adviser, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) stands out not only in size – the largest law firm and tax advisory practice – but also in the scope and reputation of its services. Backed by a seamlessly connected international network, the firm is able to support investment fund clients, helping them make the best decisions for their business and offering them a holistic approach during the full fund life cycle, from structuring and formation to marketing, operations and transactions. PwC provides ongoing or project-based legal and tax services. The firm is ranked in multiple Guides by Chambers and Partners, including Global, Europe, and NewLaw.

Trends and Developments

Authors



PricewaterhouseCoopers Tax & Legal, S.L. is the legal firm of PwC Spain, with significant depth and range of resources across five continents, including those focused on the investment management sector. The firm’s professionals think big and anticipate regulatory challenges and risks that could affect clients’ business. As a leading tax and legal adviser, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) stands out not only in size – the largest law firm and tax advisory practice – but also in the scope and reputation of its services. Backed by a seamlessly connected international network, the firm is able to support investment fund clients, helping them make the best decisions for their business and offering them a holistic approach during the full fund life cycle, from structuring and formation to marketing, operations and transactions. PwC provides ongoing or project-based legal and tax services. The firm is ranked in multiple Guides by Chambers and Partners, including Global, Europe, and NewLaw.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.