Real Estate Litigation 2025

Last Updated March 12, 2025

Dominican Republic

Law and Practice

Authors



Ulises Cabrera was established in 1966 by Dr Ulises Cabrera. The firm has evolved into a full-service multidisciplinary law firm with over 55 years of experience, advising national and international clients across all areas of law. The firm has a team of 30 attorneys, with offices strategically located in Santo Domingo to serve its diverse client base in the growing Dominican Republic economy. Its expertise spans key practice areas, including corporate law, real estate, intellectual property, energy, mining and environmental law, among others, ensuring a comprehensive approach to complex legal matters. Notable recent work includes advising Siemens Mobility on regulatory compliance for the expansion of the Santo Domingo Metro and assisting Gildan Activewear with environmental permit renewals and risk assessments. The firm is the exclusive Dominican member of the Alliott Global Alliance, reinforcing its capacity to provide global solutions. Ulises Cabrera is recognised by Chambers Global and Chambers Latin America.

Regulatory Body

Decree No. 4807 contemplated a process before the regulatory body “Rental and Eviction Control” when an owner needed access to a property or to occupy it for repair purposes. However, as part of the effect of the ruling of the Constitutional Court and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice (Ruling No. TC/0174/14, Ruling No. TC/0208/21), it was rendered powerless, and in practice said regulator has no useful functions.

Owners’ Rights

The owner has the right to access the property for repairs, but this requires the tenant’s authorisation. If authorisation is not granted, the owner must request authorisation from the court. The same applies in the event that, instead of access, a request is made to hand over the property in order to carry out repairs or for it to be occupied by the owner himself or herself (when applicable).

According to article 1724 of the Civil Code, urgent repairs are assumed by the tenant at their cost, and if the repairs last more than 40 days, the rent will be reduced proportionately.

Should an amicable solution not be reached, the owner may file a lawsuit in court to terminate the rental contract and evict the tenant. These proceedings begin in a first-degree court (justice of the peace, expected to take one year or less) and, if successful, conclude with a ruling that allows immediate eviction, even if the tenant appeals the court decision.

The tenant may stop the execution of the judgment that ordered their eviction by means of a judicial process called “referral”, until the appeal is finalised.

This process is usually completed in the court of first instance within one to three months.

In emergency situations, there are two alternative and accelerated routes that property owners could use, depending on the nature of the case:

Action in Referral

This is an accelerated process that can be requested on the basis of the existence of an emergency situation that could cause irreversible damage or on the basis that illegal acts are being committed and have been clearly perceived.

Action for Protection (Amparo)

This is a speedy process intended to protect the fundamental rights of the individual as defined by the Dominican Constitution in its articles 37 to 67 (right to life, property, education, protection of minors, senior citizens, the environment, etc), when no other remedy is available.

For this action to be justified, the violation of the right must:

  • be current, that is, it cannot be something that occurred more than 60 days prior;
  • be imminent, that is, inevitable and occurring soon;
  • be unjustified or of manifest illegality; and
  • infringe, restrict, alter or threaten the fundamental right in question.

The limitation with this action is that if there is another way to remedy the violation, namely, another available judicial process, it is not admissible by the court.

Property owners are solely responsible to the neighbours for any damage caused by the property, and the tenant is liable for any damages caused by him or her to third parties.

The owner has a right of recourse against the tenant, if the owner is forced to compensate neighbours for damages caused by the property due to a lack of repairs not carried out because the tenant denied the owner access.

The trend for several years has been for rental agreements to include a requirement that the tenant takes out an insurance policy with a reputable insurance company in favour of the owner for damages to third parties.

In the event of harassment by the landlord, the tenant may try to resolve the issue amicably; otherwise, the issue must be brought to the courts either to defend against intimidating claims or to request remediation or protection. A tenant can also seek compensation for damages, be they material or moral, caused by the owner’s actions.

The most common remedy is a “referral” to lift the seizures on bank accounts.

When dealing with situations of a criminal nature, it is necessary to go to the prosecutor’s office to obtain a restraining order, a protection order or similar.

Vertical residential buildings (apartment blocks) are regulated by Law No. 5038, which establishes the rules for incorporating and operating condominiums. Its stipulations are binding.

For horizontal residential areas not incorporated under the aforementioned law, the owners usually create a “neighbourhood council” that is registered with city hall, but its decisions are not binding.

Both the above require the payment of maintenance fees, the preservation of common areas, and other responsibilities.

In other cases, there are tourist projects, where the developer forces the purchasers to accept contractual terms and conditions regarding the rules of coexistence and administration of the residential area.

Effects of Conflict Situations Between Owner and Tenant

A conflict between a tenant and an owner has no consequences, unless maintenance fees usually covered by the owner are owed and that is part of the conflict at hand.

Should the condominium, owner or council restrict access in any way to the tenant, the tenant may warn them of potential legal action should they not remedy the situation, which may include monetary compensation.

If the above is insufficient, then the judicial route is used through the expedited referral or protection action process.

Although there is no legal concept of “harassment”, there is extensive and comprehensive legislation aimed at protecting the rights of persons, be they natural or legal, by means of interpretation of the owner’s actions to determine what violations of those rights have occurred in order to identify the appropriate legal route.

There is a wide range of consequences that an owner could face, and it will depend on the nature of the violation – which can only be determined by the competent courts – but, in most cases, it will be a matter of financial penalties with the aim of compensating the victim.

In the Dominican Republic, the concept of “statutory tenancies” does not exist, and property owners are protected by the Dominican Constitution (article 51), which states that no owner may be restricted, limited or prevented from the use, enjoyment and benefit of his or her property.

Therefore, landlords will always have the right to terminate a lease, either due to the end of its term, or early (provided this is in a reasonable manner), or due to non-compliance by the tenant. No person may, by virtue of their occupancy of a registered property (which has title), become its owner or indefinite occupant without the consent of the legal owner.

See 1.3.1 Statutory Tenancies: Types and Differences.

See 1.3.1 Statutory Tenancies: Types and Differences.

See 1.3.1 Statutory Tenancies: Types and Differences.

Governed by the Lease Agreement

A tenant’s failure to comply with a cure period may or may not be of contractual consequence, depending on the lease agreement’s terms and conditions.

If there is no provision in the lease agreement regarding time limits for remedies and/or penalties for non-compliance, the tenant is not obliged to carry out the remedy within the time period required by the landlord. The landlord must reach an amicable settlement with the tenant or go to court to claim any right related to compliance with what the landlord is demanding from the tenant.

Tenant Solutions

In the event that a tenant disagrees with the application of the contractual penalty or the landlord demands a remedy within an unachievable period, the tenant may:

  • notify the owner of the impossibility of executing the remedy within the required period, justifying the reason and indicating the period within which the remedy will be completed; and/or
  • go to court, through a quick action (referral) or a traditional lawsuit, to claim a right or defend himself or herself against the owner’s actions.

If the referral action requested by the tenant is rejected, the decision can be appealed and later on appealed in cassation before the Supreme Court of Justice.

At the same time, a separate lawsuit can be filed by the tenant to claim a right or the fulfilment of an obligation by the owner in defence to any action taken by the owner to justify the failure to comply with the remedy within the required period. This could take years.

See 1.2.1 Landlord Harassment, 1.4.1 Injunctive Remedies for Tenants Facing Insufficient Cure Periods and 1.4.2 Impact of Failing to Obtain an Injunction and Alternative Options.

Lack of Regulation

The use of a lease as a guarantee instrument for financing or investments is not regulated in the Dominican legislation.

Alternate Guarantee

However, when it comes to long-term leases (18 years or more) and when the property ownership right is registered before the Title Registry, it is possible to obtain the real estate registration of the lease as an accessory right to that of the property, issuing a title that accredits the same (certification of accessory in rem rights).

This type of instrument provides investors and financiers with certainty regarding the exclusivity of the right to use the property for a certain period of time, enforceable against everyone; that is, once the title is published in the Title Registry, no purchaser or creditor can claim not to know the terms and conditions of the lease, which are imposed on them.

This concept is very common in energy projects, which usually last from 20 to 25 years, since this registration of the right is used as part of the package of guarantees for financing and investments with foreign and local entities.

Note that the existence of a credit secured by a lease can only be known by third parties interested in the lease agreement, when it is disclosed by the debtor or guarantor.

Due to the particularities explained above, regarding revocation of a guarantee that has been granted, everything will depend on the terms and conditions of the guarantee contract. In principle, its revocation would result from an agreement between the signing parties or from a court order, and a unilateral revocation by the guarantor would not be possible, given that it is unlikely that the creditor would accept a clause in the contract that allows such action.

To recover on guarantees, the creditor may take legal action based on the contract, in the way mentioned above.

Non-Judicial

The non-judicial process allows for the voluntary delivery of the property by the debtor, which is formalised through a transactional agreement and payment in kind establishing the debt balance upon delivery of the property and authorising the transfer of the property, be it the one subject to the debt or a different property, in favour of the creditor.

Judicial

The judicial process is more expensive and time-consuming. Creditors resort to the real estate seizure process in the following ways:

1. Ordinary seizures: A document confirming the debt is necessary (ie, promissory note or court order) (article 673 et seq of the Code of Civil Procedure). The peculiarities of this process are as follows:

  • After the creditor has notified the debtor of a payment order and a 90-day period has elapsed, the seizure may be registered before the real estate authority (Title Registry), thereby blocking the property, meaning that the debtor or any other creditor cannot register real estate transactions on that property.
  • There is very little possibility to hinder or stop a real estate seizure. The law provides for limited and specific situations in which the court is obliged to suspend one.
  • Within an estimated period of two to four months after the registration of the seizure, the property is awarded to the creditor or sold at a public auction.
  • All liens that may have existed on the property prior to the registration of the seizure are cancelled, with some exceptions, and its transfer is made in favour of the successful awardee or successful bidder, free of liens.
  • The awardee, upon presenting the judgment issued by the court, which is not subject to appeal, may request the assistance of law enforcement from the prosecutor of the property location to evict any occupant who may be living there (approximately one to six months).
  • The court’s decisions on seizure cannot be appealed.

2. Foreclosures regulated by Law No. 6186 of 1963 (reserved for agricultural credit associations and mortgage secured loans):

  • After the debtor has been notified and a 20-day period has elapsed, the seizure may be registered before the Title Registry, and from that moment on transactions on the property will be blocked.
  • All the other characteristics explained above that apply to an ordinary seizure also apply.
  • If the sale of the property did not produce sufficient value to settle the debt, the creditor may register as an unsecured creditor and, consequently, will be authorised to pursue other assets of the debtor until the debt is fully collected.

3. Foreclosures regulated by Law No. 189-11 (reserved for banks and trust companies and mortgage secured loans):

  • After the debtor has been notified and a 20-day period has elapsed, the seizure may be registered before the Title Registry, and from that moment on the property will be blocked.
  • All other characteristics explained above apply to an ordinary seizure.
  • The creditor has the power to choose the date of the sale within the legal deadlines.

If a property owner pledges their equity as a collateral, a lender can foreclose on that equity in case of default. However, when there are co-owners, it is unlikely for the creditor to physically materialise that foreclosure on the property since a plan approved by the Title Registry is required and the property must be divided. The creditor could reach an agreement with the co-owner; if not, they must petition the court for the partition of the property.

In practice, mortgage loans are only granted if all the owners agree to the guarantee.

In mortgage contracts in the Dominican Republic, it is common to include clauses that authorise the creditor to terminate the contract in the event of non-payment of an instalment or even a fraction thereof, without the need to grant additional terms to give the debtor a notice of default.

When a debtor fails to meet a payment obligation, the creditor generally grants the debtor an additional period that varies according to that financial entity’s policies.

This concession given by the creditor is not contemplated in the Dominican legislation; rather, it results from the creditor seeking to recover the credit in cash and not incur the legal expenses of execution usually associated with communicating through emails, text messages and phone calls and, as a last resort, demand for payment via a court bailiff.

In the Dominican Republic, the rights of redemption are not clearly stated but may be derived from the following:

Dominican Civil Code:

  • The debt may be paid by the guarantor or a third party (article 1236).
  • A court may grant payment of the debt in instalments and suspend the execution of the real estate guarantee with a six-month grace period (article 1244 et seq).
  • The debtor may offer the payment via a bailiff’s act, should the creditor refuse to accept payment (article 1257).

Code of Civil Procedure:

  • The surplus amount after a public auction may be requested by the debtor (Law No. 6186, article 688).
  • The debtor may interrupt the seizure process by settling the debt or making payment agreements.

Law No. 6186:

  • The debtor may settle the debt at time.
  • Thew debtor may challenge the procedure on the grounds of unlawful acts and breaching the law.
  • The surplus amount after a public auction may be requested by the debtor.

Law No. 189-11:

  • The debtor may pay off the debt within 15 days before the foreclosure begins.
  • The debtor may receive the surplus from the sale.
  • The debtor may submit legal objections to the seizure within the established deadlines.

When the property is acquired by a bidder at a public auction, nothing prevents the debtor from negotiating purchase from that bidder.

A creditor could pursue the co-owned property of his or her debtor but will be unable to execute the seizure due to the lack of a plan defining its size and location.

The creditor may pursue action against the debtor’s assets in multiple proceedings in the following ways:

  • A creditor may pursue other actions over the debtor’s assets at the same time as a seizure, provided that the creditor has a judicial mortgage in his or her favour, obtained when the credit is backed by a judgment or a promissory note.
  • Pursuant to the provisions of the Dominican Civil Code (article 2130) and Law No. 6186, if, after the sale of the property at a public auction, there remains an outstanding balance of the debt, then the creditor becomes an unsecured creditor with respect to that difference and may pursue the remainder of the debtor’s assets, as well as his or her future assets (article 192).

Conventional Mortgage

The law does not allow the creditor to simultaneously execute other personal actions against the debtor, since the creditor’s actions are limited to the properties that were set up as collateral.

Right of Redemption

A debtor who is the subject of a seizure has the right to claim the return of the surplus of the value obtained, once the debt with the creditor has been settled (article 1235 Dominican Civil Code).

Non-Judicial

A non-judicial process may take two to four months including paying tax, registering the amicable agreement and issuing a title in favour of the creditor.

Judicial

The time frame of a judicial process is estimated as follows:

  • Ordinary seizures: 1 to 3 years.
  • Seizures regulated by Law No. 6186: Between 8 months and 1 year.
  • Seizures under Law No. 189-11: Between 6 months and 1 year.

In a real estate seizure, the formula for calculating the debt is:

Capital + interest + legal fees and expenses = debt

If, after sale at a public auction, the securities received are insufficient to cover the debt, the creditor may apply the amount from the sale, first to legal fees and expenses, then to interest, and finally to the capital.

Both Law No. 6186 and the Dominican Civil Code grant the creditor the power to become an unsecured creditor, meaning the creditor has the ability to continue to pursue the debtor’s assets until the total collection of the debt, but no longer has the right of preference over other creditors.

The most common entities for joint ventures are:

  • Limited liability company (SRL): An owner’s liability is limited to the capital it contributes to the company, with a minimum of two members.
  • Public limited company (SA): Shares are freely traded, and at least two shareholders are required.
  • Simplified joint-stock company (SAS): This is a flexible business model with less restrictive regulations, with a minimum of two shareholders.

A joint venture requires the collaboration of the partners on a specific project. Commonly, one partner may contribute with assets such as capital or land and another with know-how. Specific projects may include, for example, renewable energy projects, tourism projects, etc.

Persons with ownership interests in a real estate joint venture must act in accordance with the constitution, laws and regulations of the country and in good faith, prioritising the best interests of the joint venture.

Considering the real estate legal system, there are three types of mechanisms to seek remedy against owners who violate those duties:

  • Registry actions (Law No. 108-05): Preventive warnings may be registered against the title to make any conflict related to the property enforceable against third parties intending to register a promissory note, mortgages and caveats.
  • Judicial proceedings: These may be referrals seeking to stop an act that is clearly illegal or that would cause irreversible damage, consisting of any of the following claims: a constitutional rights action; a real estate lawsuit; or a civil or commercial lawsuit.
  • Arbitration: If the remedies sought pertain to commercial or civil matters, the parties may agree to local or international arbitration.

Conflicts that relate to decision-making within the joint venture, when there is no amicable agreement for their solution, and provided that they do not affect the property rights of a property (limit them, restrict them, modify them or create burdens), are resolved in one of three ways:

  • Contractually: in accordance with the process established in the joint venture agreement;
  • Judicially: if the joint venture agreement did not include a provision for the resolution of the conflict in question; or
  • By arbitration: as established in the joint venture agreement.

Any conflict that is not resolved amicably and that involves the modification, limitation or creation of a burden on a real estate right will have to be resolved judicially before the courts of the real estate jurisdiction.

Automatic entry of judgment is not possible since court orders are preceded by a legal action initiated by a person before a court and its enforceability would not be immediate, except for referral and protection of constitutional rights, which are immediately enforceable.

Otherwise, court orders on non-urgent claims may only be executed when they are not subject to appeal and their suspension has not been ordered on the basis of an appeal in cassation, which is the last resort before the courts.

Provisional Measures

When applicable, provisional measures are available to preserve the rights associated with real estate, the most frequent being:

  • Provisional filing: This is a warning to all parties interested in acquiring, mortgaging or transacting with the property that the title of the property is registered before the authority and is subject to a legal conflict.
  • Injunctive relief: This is a request made to the civil court to register a provisional judicial mortgage to guarantee the payment of a sum that is subject to validation by a court. If favourable, it is registered and renewed every three months until a document is obtained that allows it to be transformed into a definitive judicial mortgage. This mortgage has a similar effect to a preventive annotation, but it is not conclusive against a creditor who has registered a promissory note, a conventional mortgage or a definitive judicial mortgage before this date.

The methods of termination of the joint venture will be contained in a dissolution clause in the contract, be it by the will of the partners, or at the end of a set period, or in the event of poor business performance such as low returns on equity, failure to capture market share, etc.

In the event that a new company has been established to channel the operation of the joint venture, the company is dissolved as per the stipulations in the bylaws or in the partnership agreement. Once the company has been dissolved, the liquidation period will start, except in the case of a total merger or spin-off or any other form of global transfer of assets and liabilities.

The real estate guarantees are:

  • Antichresis: The debtor gives the use of a property to the creditor as a guarantee of payment of a debt, characterised by the following:
    1. The creditor may benefit from the fruits or income produced by the property.
    2. It must be registered before the Title Registry.
    3. The creditor has the responsibility to care for and maintain the property.
  • Mortgages: The Dominican Civil Code defines mortgages as in rem rights over real estate that are affected by the fulfilment of an obligation. These are classified as follows: legal (credit based on law); judicial (by judgment); or conventional (based on an agreement). A mortgage can be constituted if the real estate is commercialisable, which means that it can be legally subjected to any transaction.
  • Guarantee trust: The debtor transfers the property to a trust to guarantee that he or she will not default on his or her obligations. Once the financial commitment has been settled, the property may return to the debtor’s estate (Law No. 189-11).

In unsecured loan contracts, creditors usually do not prohibit the debtor from making transactions with his or her assets. However, it is customary in practice that it constitutes a violation of the contract and the debtor loses the right to pay within the agreed term, and the creditor may demand the balance before its due date.

If the debtor engages in fraudulent conduct or bad faith acts aimed at becoming insolvent so that the creditor cannot pursue his or her assets, the debtor may be subject to civil, commercial or criminal actions, depending on the circumstances and the acts committed by the debtor.

Key Elements for Enforcing or Defending the Execution of Real Estate Guarantees

  • Conduct due diligence on the property to confirm that it belongs to the potential debtor, that it is located in the place shown, that it has the dimensions stipulated in the title, and that it is free of liens or environmental, mining, energy or any other encumbrances that in some way limit or restrict the right of ownership.
  • Secure the credit with a formal document establishing the mortgage guarantee.
  • Register this act with the real estate authority (Title Registry), so that it can be imposed on any other person who intends to carry out a transaction with the property.
  • Clearly specify in the contract the term for the balance, the interest, the method of payment, the identity of the property, and the conditions under which the creditor would be entitled to execute a seizure.
  • Ensure that the documentation submitted to the court reflects the legal or contractual basis for the debt.

General Rules for Mortgages

  • The contract must clearly establish the property subject to the guarantee, the amount of the loan and the rank of the mortgage.
  • The mortgage affects the entire property and cannot be divided.
  • Only the person registered as the owner of the property can consent to the mortgage.
  • The mortgage is only registered if the act that constitutes it is formalised in the Dominican Republic before a notary public or before an official of equal rank (consul).

Waivers of Defence

The Dominican Civil Code establishes that legally formed agreements have the force of law between the contracting parties (article 1134); however, the validity of the clauses on waiver of rights established in a contract will be subject to legal review, if these are contrary to the law in the sense that they violate a fundamental right or a public order rule.

In the Dominican Republic, real estate seizure governed by Law No. 189-11 is considered expedited compared to other seizures, and is reserved for banks and trust companies legally established in the Dominican Republic. Pursuant to Article 149, it only applies when the mortgage guarantee has been granted in a conventional manner. The creditor can only pursue the properties that were used as collateral through a mortgage loan contract.

Although it is an expedited process compared to others, it limits creditors by their type (banking and fiduciary sector) and does not allow the pursuit of other assets of a debtor who has already agreed to use one or more properties as a guarantee of payment.

Expedited Procedure

An expedited procedure is accepted by the courts when it is sought to end a manifestly illicit or harmful situation, and therefore the need for receivership is of an urgent nature.

The appointment of a receiver is made through an expedited procedure called “referral”, which is characterised by its speed due to the urgency of the request. The process is usually made in a maximum of two hearings, and the court issues its decision within a period of two months or less.

In principle, this type of action is introduced after a lawsuit has been initiated in court seeking the recognition or annihilation of some right, since this establishes before the referral court that there is a serious and formal claim or conflict which justifies the need for the judicial administrator.

Selection of a Receiver

Typically, the administration of a property involves the management of assets, whether from the operation of the business that exists there, rents, maintenance and other related matters; therefore, the judicial administrator that is commonly proposed is a certified public accountant.

The judicial administrator can be chosen in one of the following ways:

  • The official entity where all certified public accountants are registered issues a proposal with three candidates, from which the court chooses one; or
  • The plaintiff presents one or more candidates to the court, which chooses one that is not objected to by the defendant.

Associated Costs

Receivers are independent professionals who freely establish their fees and expenses to be charged for the service for which they are appointed by the court. The plaintiff is usually the one who must cover this cost as an interested party in safeguarding the asset of interest, but in some cases the costs are shared by both parties.

The use of receivers is common in the following disputes:

  • Inheritances: It is common to appoint a receiver when there are properties of high importance due to their commercial use or strategic location, in the event of a conflict between multiple heirs, in order to prevent the benefits arising from these assets from being used disproportionately among the heirs, until such time as their division and distribution is ordered by a court.
  • Family companies: Entities that develop their businesses with a family base for their operations tend to be subject to internal conflicts that end in litigation before the courts. There is commonly a distrust in the management of the business, and this leads to the appointment of a judicial administrator.

Likelihood of Appointment

This measure is invasive and therefore, when evaluating its importance, the courts will take into consideration whether or not it is more harmful to safeguard the property, and the businesses associated with it.

For example, a large company with a recognised presence in the market, where there appears to be no danger to its assets, is unlikely to have a receiver appointed by the court, unless the plaintiff can demonstrate a manifestly unlawful or harmful situation.

In inheritance conflicts, the probability of the appointment of a receiver with respect to real estate is high, because the law establishes very clear rules and principles regarding the rights of the heirs, which are equal and proportional to their interest, and therefore no one can benefit more than others, except for limited exceptions that are allowed by law.

In the Dominican Republic, there are two concepts similar to “bankruptcy”, limited to companies and traders:

  • restructuring that is requested by the debtor or the creditor before the court, whereby people can continue their business operations, and a plan is established indicating the manner in which the debtor will cover its liabilities; and
  • liquidation, where there is a judicial distribution of a debtor’s assets among the creditors when a restructuring plan is not fulfilled or is unfeasible.

Should there only be one real estate property, the admissibility is decided by a judge on a case-by-case basis.

Starting a restructuring process impacts the lender’s ability to foreclose or collect on a debt, as there is a suspensive effect until the conciliation and negotiation is concluded or is converted to a judicial liquidation (article 59 Law No. 141-15):

Suspension Exclusions

It should be noted that, pursuant to Law No. 141-15, the following actions and/or obligations are not suspended:

  • all judicial, administrative and arbitration actions when there is a final judgment, or when they deal with contracts on securities subject to public offering originated prior to the request for restructuring, but with a settlement date after it;
  • the rest of the legal and administrative actions in progress not included within those set out above, which must be heard and decided by the competent court, after the conciliator and the creditors have been summoned to court;
  • child and family support payments;
  • labour receivables; and
  • payments essential for the ordinary operation of the company, determined and justified in a case-by-case manner before the conciliator.

Resumption of Legal Actions

All actions aimed at collecting sums of money suspended by virtue of Article 54 will resume at the request of the creditor once the credit is determined or recognised, either by a conventional act or by a court decision and when the credit is verified and fixed by the restructuring plan.

The real estate jurisdiction has exclusive jurisdiction to resolve conflicts regarding the right of ownership or its accessories (article 3 Law No. 108-05, confirmed by the Supreme Court of Justice).

However, in matters of commercial or contractual disagreement involving a property, if the cause of the dispute has no relation to land ownership rights, then arbitration is appropriate.

See 6.1 Prevalence of Arbitration Clauses.

See 6.1 Prevalence of Arbitration Clauses.

The most frequent and efficient provisional measures are the following:

  • Provisional filing: The purpose of this is to warn the public that there is a dispute pertaining the property, so that any person who carries out a transaction will have to face the consequences of that dispute.
  • Provisional judicial mortgage: This is the most popular measure used by unsecured creditors. It is valid for three months, after which it is necessary to register its renewal, otherwise it loses its status.
  • Legal mortgage for married women: This is a reservation for married women to prevent their husbands from selling or mortgaging the property without their consent.
  • Mortgage by promissory note: This is a mortgage whose registration does not require the authorisation or acceptance of the debtor, when it results from a promissory note in which the debtor committed his or her personal assets to the creditor.
  • Condominium privilege: When one of the members fails to pay maintenance, the condominium may register this lien for the amount owed and initiate a real estate seizure.
  • Tax privilege: The State may register a lien on the debtor’s real estate based on unpaid tax, taking preference over any other registered creditor that exists.
  • Seizures: On the occasion of a criminal investigation by the public prosecutor, the State may register “seizures”, which consist of blocking a property so that it may not be the object of real estate transactions until it is released by the public prosecutor or by a court order.
  • Judicial administration: This measure restricts and/or limits the use of a property until a conflict is resolved or a situation that motivated the request for this measure is overcome.

The registration of a provisional measure is made by request from the creditor, by court order or by an act signed by the debtor prior to failure to pay, as follows:

  • Cautionary note: This is registered at the request of the creditor presenting a certification of an ongoing litigation issued by the court.
  • Provisional judicial mortgage: This can be registered after obtaining a judgment (not final) or a judicial authorisation, recognising that there is a debt or potential debt.
  • Legal mortgage for married women: This is requested by the wife and must be accompanied by the marriage certificate.
  • Mortgage by promissory note: This is requested by the creditor, requiring only the promissory note signed by the debtor.
  • Condominium privilege: This is requested by the group of owners of the condominium with the minutes of the condominium meeting that authorised such registration.
  • Tax privilege: This is requested by the State via the tax office.
  • Seizures: This is requested by the public prosecutor, authorised by the court. Due to the nature of the order (crime or offence), the debtor becomes aware of the court order when it is executed.
  • Judicial administration: This is requested by the creditor, with judicial authorisation.

The inappropriate use of provisional measures is understood as the registration of liens based on documents that appear to be valid but in reality do not comply with the essential legal conditions for their validity, or when an abusive use of these has occurred.

The consequences of inappropriate use of provisional measures can be summarised as follows:

  • The Title Registry can refuse registration of the measure.
  • In the event that the measure is registered, it can be invalidated by an annulment ordered by a court.
  • It may involve the civil liability of the creditor, who is susceptible to a judicial conviction in compensation for the benefit of the debtor.

It should be noted that the current legislation establishes provisional measures that do not require a court authorisation, although those that do require a court authorisation are limited, namely provisional judicial mortgages, judicial administrations and seizures.

Courts usually accept requests for provisional measures, provided that they have sufficient legal basis, which includes the documentation that, according to the applicable regulations, is essential to accept this type of request.

Once the application is filed, the process until the court issues a decision usually takes between two and four months, or days in the case of seizures.

Everything relating to liability for damages is regulated by the Dominican Civil Code, since the real estate regulations do not include provisions or sanctions for reparable or non-reparable damages. Although there is the possibility of requesting that compensation for damages be considered reckless in a real estate lawsuit, the reality is that real estate courts do not usually accept these requests.

All damage must be repaired. The affected party has the possibility of going to the civil or commercial courts to claim compensation by demonstrating a direct link between the cause and the damage.

The concept of “mechanic’s liens” does not exist as such in real estate regulations, but instead any person who has a credit which the debtor in writing has accepted their commitment to pay, has the possibility of requesting and obtaining any of the charges (provisional measures) that have been described in 7.1 Types of Provisional Remedies in Real Estate Disputes.

In the Dominican Republic, the closest concept is that of real estate development trusts, specifically those for low-cost housing, which have the dual purpose of countering the housing shortage and making the mortgage market more flexible.

Real estate seizures affecting properties acquired under a trust are the responsibility of civil courts and are governed by Law No. 189-11. This law regulates the process of executing the guarantee in the event of non-compliance by the debtor, establishing simpler and faster procedures compared to the seizure process provided for in the Civil Procedure Code.

Law No. 189-11 allows the creditor to recover the debt within a relatively short period (approximately six months) through the proceeds of the sale of the property at a public auction or, if there are no interested parties, through the transfer of the property to his or her estate.

Claims seeking the termination or execution of a contract are filed before the Civil Court, which will analyse the content of the document to identify whether the terms and conditions governing the agreed transaction have been met.

If the content of the contract is ambiguous, the judge will have the task of interpreting the will of the parties at the time of formalising the agreement. Finally, by means of a ruling, the court will establish the result of its review, determining the consequences in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.

Public interest has a significant impact on research and strategies that involve real estate projects, as well as the consideration of foreign and national investment.

In the Dominican Republic, it is unlikely that the State will carry out expropriations on properties established in trusts for low-cost housing, and even more so if there are already buildings on those properties. Although property rights are a fundamental right, when a property must fulfil a social function that benefits the community, the public interest prevails over the private interest of the owner, which is the case in expropriation cases.

Generally, the State declares properties of public utility for agricultural and energy projects, expansion of public roads, construction of irrigation canals, and installation of antennas for energy transmission, among others. These projects are not usually located in urban areas, where low-cost housing trusts are commonly developed.

In recent years, the State has adopted the practice of acquiring from the owner only the amount of land on the property necessary for the work, instead of expropriating the entire property as used to happen.

Ulises Cabrera

Av. John F. Kennedy 64
Santo Domingo
10512
Dominican Republic

+1 809 566 7111

info@ulisescabrera.com www.ulisescabrera.com
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



Ulises Cabrera was established in 1966 by Dr Ulises Cabrera. The firm has evolved into a full-service multidisciplinary law firm with over 55 years of experience, advising national and international clients across all areas of law. The firm has a team of 30 attorneys, with offices strategically located in Santo Domingo to serve its diverse client base in the growing Dominican Republic economy. Its expertise spans key practice areas, including corporate law, real estate, intellectual property, energy, mining and environmental law, among others, ensuring a comprehensive approach to complex legal matters. Notable recent work includes advising Siemens Mobility on regulatory compliance for the expansion of the Santo Domingo Metro and assisting Gildan Activewear with environmental permit renewals and risk assessments. The firm is the exclusive Dominican member of the Alliott Global Alliance, reinforcing its capacity to provide global solutions. Ulises Cabrera is recognised by Chambers Global and Chambers Latin America.

Development of Real Estate Projects for First and Second Homes

by Jeanny Arista Santana and Emely Ramírez

Introduction

The construction sector has seen a boom in real estate projects in recent years, mainly consisting of low-cost housing, developed as multitudinous complexes comprising multiple four-storey buildings, with two apartments per level and no elevators.

Issues

Housing projects are facing important challenges that are significantly affecting the market, including the following:

  • The cost of construction materials in 2024 showed an increase of more than 7% on the previous year, the most prevalent of those materials being steel and cement.
  • In addition to this, there is an agreed-upon and scheduled increase in the workforce in the beginning of 2025.
  • The annual interest rate on mortgage loans in Dominican pesos rose from 7% to 14% over the course of 2024 and is projected to increase to 16%.
  • Low-cost housing that was valued at less than USD34,000 in 2020 now exceeds USD84,000.

As a result of this situation, buyers are withdrawing from conditional purchases that had been agreed to be paid for in instalments and are demanding the builders reimburse the advanced amounts, causing a significant increase in legal claims before the courts, with the focus of discussion being whether the application of the penalty for the withdrawal should be based on the total of the amount advanced or on the sale price.

Simultaneously, while real estate projects are in decline, builders are forced to cease construction work on their projects and are not able to meet their contractual obligations with both the buyers and the banking institutions with whom they have entered into an agreement to finance those projects.

Banking institutions are making efforts to avoid seizures against real estate projects, buyers and builders, considering that the situation of non-compliance derives from elements of the banking sector that are directly affecting the real estate market, rather than from lack of demand for the purchase of homes, which continues to be a very significant and dynamic demand, and is additionally being encouraged by the Dominican State by means of the offering of tax, credit and financing incentives.

Solutions overview

The Central Bank of the Dominican Republic, as a measure to counteract this banking situation, authorised the release of DOP573 million from the legal reserve to boost mortgage and construction loans. This measure authorised financial institutions to grant loans at a reduced interest rate of no more than 10% per year.

Some of the solutions being presented include attracting local and foreign investors to complete real estate projects that are already underway.

An important trend of local banks is the inducement of Dominican nationals who reside outside the country to purchase real estate locally, offering mortgage loans, and as part of this, for example, a branch of the Reserve Bank of the Dominican Republic was opened in the US state of New York and investment promotion events have been held by other Dominican banks in that jurisdiction.

It is estimated that many Dominicans who live outside the country may be inclined to purchase a low-cost home in the Dominican Republic and that, compared to locals, they have a greater capacity to pay the mortgage products offered by the local market.

Update on the Real Estate Market in the Industrial and Warehouse Sector

by Jeanny Arista Santana and Emely Ramírez

Introduction

During 2024, there was an increase in demand for spaces for the installation of distribution and logistics centres, as well as warehouses, in strategic areas of Santo Domingo, mainly on the outskirts of the city, as well as in Punta Cana.

For this reason, there is a need to develop industrial zone projects for leasing, with sale being a less common option, and warehouses being the most common type of development.

Issues

Given this situation, the price of rent has increased significantly, so that owners with long-standing tenants are seeking immediate adjustment of the original prices, which is generating conflicts between owners and tenants, leading to measures being taken from simple extrajudicial acts to seizures, demands for the termination of contracts and eviction actions.

The actions of such landlords are characterised by their recklessness, as they attempt to present a case whereby the tenant has “breached” the contract by failing to pay the adjustments that the landlord has applied without prior mutual agreement with the tenant, all with the aim of intimidating the latter into either agreeing to the sudden increase in price or vacating the property.

From a legal perspective, these lawsuits are often without merit, but they do create uncertainty and discomfort for business owners, enough for them to consider the possibility of moving their logistics centre to another space where the rent is lower, but they need time to carry out an operation of that magnitude, so it is up to lawyers to assist them against attacks from the owners.

Solutions overview

There is an expectation that these situations will be mitigated if the draft of the new rental law in the Dominican Republic is approved, which, among other aspects, provides for the following:

  • the rental price may only be increased annually by up to 5%;
  • the owner may not terminate the lease early, except in the event of non-compliance by the tenant; and
  • the owner may terminate the contract upon its expiration date by not accepting its renewal, for which he or she must notify the tenant with six months’ notice.

For commercial leases, six months’ notice may often be insufficient, considering the complexity involved in moving a logistics centre or any business, so if the law is approved under these conditions, the solution would be to contractually provide for more realistic terms and mechanisms that are consistent with the business model that would be adopted in the property.

This bill is likely to be amended, given that its content needs significant improvements, and it is still subject to review and approval by the Chamber of Deputies of the National Congress.

Trends and Developments in Free Zone Real Estate in the Dominican Republic

by Mónica Villafaña

The Dominican Republic has long been a hub for free zone operations, as they offer tax incentives, strategic location advantages and a skilled labour force. In recent years, the free zone sector has evolved significantly, driven by new trends, technological advancements, and increasing demand for sustainable and specialised industrial spaces. For investors, this dynamic environment presents exciting opportunities in real estate development tailored to free zone parks.

This article examines the emerging trends and developments shaping the free zone real estate market in the Dominican Republic and how local and foreign investors can capitalise on them.

The rise of specialised free zone parks

One of the most prominent trends in the real estate sector is the rise of specialised free zone parks. While traditional free zones catered to general manufacturing and logistics, the demand for industry-specific facilities has grown substantially.

Key sectors driving this trend include:

  • Medical devices: The Dominican Republic is now one of the largest exporters of medical devices in Latin America. Various free zone parks are now tailoring their infrastructure to meet the specific needs of this industry.
  • Technology and electronics: The growing global reliance on semiconductors and electronics has spurred demand for advanced manufacturing facilities, including a special decree approved during 2024 to incentivise this specific sector.
  • Renewable energy: As sustainability becomes a priority, parks focused on renewable energy projects, such as Bani Free Zone, are gaining traction.

For investors, this shift means an opportunity to develop highly specialized facilities, such as clean rooms for medical device manufacturing or energy-efficient warehouses for renewable energy projects.

Sustainability and green development

Sustainability is no longer optional; it is a central focus for businesses operating in free zones. As companies strive to meet environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards, free zone parks are increasingly incorporating green development practices.

Emerging trends in sustainable free zone real estate include:

  • Energy-efficient buildings: Warehouses and offices designed to reduce energy consumption, incorporating features such as LED lighting and solar panels.
  • Water recycling systems: Facilities that minimise water usage, particularly in industries such as textiles.
  • Carbon-neutral operations: Developers are increasingly incorporating renewable energy sources and sustainable supply chain practices.

Investors who prioritise green building practices not only attract ESG-conscious tenants but also align with the Dominican government’s incentives for renewable energy projects, enhancing the long-term value of their investments.

Integration of technology

The free zone sector is undergoing a digital transformation, with technology playing a critical role in shaping the future of industrial and commercial spaces.

Key technological trends include:

  • Smart warehouses: Incorporating IoT (Internet of Things) devices, automated systems and real-time inventory tracking.
  • Data centres: With the growth of cloud computing and digital services, there is increasing demand for free zone facilities designed for data storage and management.
  • Advanced security systems: Modern free zone parks are integrating AI-driven security measures, such as facial recognition and automated access controls.

Developers who incorporate cutting-edge technologies into their projects stand to gain a competitive edge, attracting tenants seeking to streamline their operations and enhance productivity.

Shifting demand: flexibility and multi-use spaces

As global supply chains adapt to new realities, the demand for flexible and multi-use spaces in free zones is rising. Tenants now prioritise facilities that can adapt to changing business models and operational needs.

Key developments in this area include:

  • Hybrid spaces: Facilities that combine office, manufacturing and storage capabilities within a single unit.
  • Scalable infrastructure: Modular buildings that allow tenants to expand or downsize without significant capital investment.
  • Shared amenities: Free zone parks offering shared resources such as meeting rooms, cafeterias and recreational areas to enhance tenant satisfaction.

Investors can cater to this demand by designing versatile spaces that accommodate diverse industries and business models.

Expansion of logistics and e-commerce

The boom in e-commerce has created significant demand for logistics infrastructure, particularly in regions like the Dominican Republic, which serves as a gateway to the Americas. Free zone parks are increasingly being developed to support the growth of logistics and distribution networks.

Trends in this area include:

  • Last-mile delivery hubs: Facilities strategically located near urban centres to optimise delivery times.
  • Cold storage: Warehouses equipped for temperature-sensitive goods, such as pharmaceuticals and food products.
  • Regional distribution centres: Parks that cater to multinational companies looking to centralise their operations in the Caribbean and take advantage of various tax incentives for this business model.

For investors, focusing on logistics-oriented real estate within free zones offers long-term revenue potential as e-commerce and global trade continue to expand.

Government support and policy developments

The Dominican government has been historically very proactive in supporting the free zone sector, introducing policies and incentives to attract investment and modernise infrastructure. Recent developments include:

  • Modernised Free Zone Law: Proposed updates to Law No. 8-90 aim to expand tax incentives and streamline bureaucratic processes.
  • Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Increased collaboration between the government and private investors to develop new free zone parks and upgrade existing ones.
  • Infrastructure investments: Projects such as highway expansions and port modernisations are enhancing connectivity for free zone parks across the country’s main areas.

Investors should keep a close eye on these policy developments, as they create a favourable environment for real estate investments in the sector.

Opportunities for real estate investors

The trends and developments outlined above highlight a wealth of opportunities for real estate investors in the Dominican Republic’s free zone sector. By aligning their investments with these trends, investors can position themselves for success in a rapidly evolving market.

Key areas of opportunity:

  • Specialised facilities: Develop infrastructure tailored to high-growth industries, such as medical devices, renewable energy and technology.
  • Sustainable projects: Incorporate green building practices to attract ESG-conscious tenants and benefit from government incentives.
  • Technology integration: Invest in smart buildings and advanced technological solutions to enhance tenant operations.
  • Logistics infrastructure: Capitalise on the growth of e-commerce by developing modern logistics and distribution facilities.

The path forward

The free zone real estate market in the Dominican Republic is at an exciting crossroads, driven by trends in sustainability, technology and specialised industries. For investors, this sector offers not only profitable opportunities but also the chance to contribute to the country’s economic growth and innovation.

By staying informed of emerging trends, partnering with local experts and aligning investments with tenant demands, investors can unlock the full potential of this dynamic market. The Dominican Republic’s free zones are not just a gateway for global trade; they are a gateway for forward-thinking investors ready to embrace the future of business.

Estate Trusts in the Dominican Republic: Tax Challenges and Opportunities

by Maricell Silvestre

Concept of a trust

A trust is a contract based on mutual trust between the settlor and the trustee. The trustee manages the trust assets for the benefit of the beneficiaries, following the instructions established in the deed of trust and under the applicable legislation. It can be established for any legal purpose.

Regulatory framework

In the Dominican Republic, trusts are regulated by:

  • Law No. 189-11: Develops the mortgage market and regulates trusts.
  • Decree No. 95-12: Complements Law No. 189-11 and regulates its application.

Types of trusts

The main types of trust, according to Law No. 189-11, include:

  • Estate planning trust.
  • Investment trust.
  • Real estate and development trust.
  • Public offering trust.
  • Guarantee trust.
  • Cultural, philanthropic and educational trusts.

Other trusts may be established, always subject to the current legislation and additional regulations.

Estate planning trusts

An estate planning trust appoints a trustee to manage the settlor’s assets after his or her death, for the benefit of designated heirs. Key points:

  • Only entities authorised by the General Directorate of Internal Revenue (DGII) can act as trustees.
  • The settlor can modify instructions through revocable trusts.
  • Instructions may be supplemented through memoranda or letters of wishes, provided that the purpose of the trust is not altered.
  • The structure must respect the legal reserve portion of the estate (reserva legal) established in the Civil Code.

Reserved inheritance

The hereditary reserve is the portion of assets that the deceased cannot freely dispose of, guaranteeing the rights to reserved heirs, and is a matter of public order that cannot be modified by the owner.

  • Hereditary reserve: Protects heir-at-law.
  • Available quota: Part that the deceased can freely dispose of.
  • Example (article 913 of the Civil Code):
    1. 1 child: 50% available.
    2. 2 children: 33% available.
    3. 3 or more children: 25% available.

Order of succession

Inheritance follows an established order:

1. Children and descendants.

2. Parents and siblings (privileged collateral relatives).

3. Brothers, sisters and their descendants (in the absence of parents).

4. Ordinary ancestors and other collateral relatives.

Impact of the hereditary reserve on trusts

Law No. 189-11 guarantees that trusts do not violate the hereditary reserve. If this occurs:

  • The affected provisions shall be void.
  • The trust will be adjusted to respect the reserved proportion.

The settlor can structure the trust to ensure:

  • Benefit for reserved heirs.
  • Compliance with legal percentages.
  • A balance of flexibility and legal compliance.

Steps to create an estate planning trust

1. Identify the heirs-at-law.

2. Calculate the hereditary reserve.

3. Assign assets to the trust.

4. Create the trust with an authorised trustee.

5. Periodically review its structure.

Fiscal impact and administrative complexity

Estate trusts have significant tax implications:

Applicable taxes:

  • Inheritance and gift tax: 3% on the estate, after deductions.
  • Real estate transfer tax: 3% of the value of the property.
  • Income tax (ISR): Applies to income generated (rent, interest, dividends).
  • Asset tax: 1% annually on productive assets.

Administration costs:

  • Trustee fees for incorporation and administration.
  • Administrative complexity: Tax declarations and compliance with formalities before the DGII.

Alternatives and solutions

Given the tax and administrative burden, local succession trusts face limitations. Suggested solutions:

  • Incorporate international structures (eg, private foundation or Anglo-Saxon trust).
  • Create hybrid strategies that combine:
    1. Local trusts for specific assets (eg, family businesses, real estate).
    2. International instruments to ensure confidentiality and tax efficiency.

Hybrid planning

The combination of local and international legal tools allows the settlor to:

  • Minimise the fiscal impact.
  • Protect the heritage.
  • Ensure efficiency and confidentiality.

Example: Using local trusts to develop productive real estate, and wills or private foundations for other assets.

Conclusion

The estate trust is a powerful tool for estate planning, but it faces tax and administrative challenges. The current trend favours diversified strategies that optimise legal and tax benefits. Carefully evaluating estate and family objectives is key to structuring an efficient and sustainable plan.

Ulises Cabrera

Av. John F. Kennedy 64,
Santo Domingo,
10512,
Dominican Republic

+1 809 566 7111

info@ulisescabrera.com www.ulisescabrera.com
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Ulises Cabrera was established in 1966 by Dr Ulises Cabrera. The firm has evolved into a full-service multidisciplinary law firm with over 55 years of experience, advising national and international clients across all areas of law. The firm has a team of 30 attorneys, with offices strategically located in Santo Domingo to serve its diverse client base in the growing Dominican Republic economy. Its expertise spans key practice areas, including corporate law, real estate, intellectual property, energy, mining and environmental law, among others, ensuring a comprehensive approach to complex legal matters. Notable recent work includes advising Siemens Mobility on regulatory compliance for the expansion of the Santo Domingo Metro and assisting Gildan Activewear with environmental permit renewals and risk assessments. The firm is the exclusive Dominican member of the Alliott Global Alliance, reinforcing its capacity to provide global solutions. Ulises Cabrera is recognised by Chambers Global and Chambers Latin America.

Trends and Developments

Authors



Ulises Cabrera was established in 1966 by Dr Ulises Cabrera. The firm has evolved into a full-service multidisciplinary law firm with over 55 years of experience, advising national and international clients across all areas of law. The firm has a team of 30 attorneys, with offices strategically located in Santo Domingo to serve its diverse client base in the growing Dominican Republic economy. Its expertise spans key practice areas, including corporate law, real estate, intellectual property, energy, mining and environmental law, among others, ensuring a comprehensive approach to complex legal matters. Notable recent work includes advising Siemens Mobility on regulatory compliance for the expansion of the Santo Domingo Metro and assisting Gildan Activewear with environmental permit renewals and risk assessments. The firm is the exclusive Dominican member of the Alliott Global Alliance, reinforcing its capacity to provide global solutions. Ulises Cabrera is recognised by Chambers Global and Chambers Latin America.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.