The Cayman Islands is a jurisdiction recognised worldwide as an international financial centre of the highest calibre. Leading financial institutions, Fortune 500 companies and private and public businesses from across the globe have chosen the Cayman Islands as their jurisdiction of choice for many reasons, including the following.
As a British Overseas Territory, the Cayman Islands has a familiar and reliable legal system based on English common law, supplemented by a modern and commercial statutory framework. With a sophisticated, well-developed court system; a history of stable government; and a deep, respected bench of jurists familiar with complex commercial cases, the Cayman Islands provides a secure venue for high-stakes commercial litigation. The ultimate appellate court for Cayman Islands matters is the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London.
Statistics produced by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority for Q2 2026 show growth across both mutual funds and private funds. This includes 18,132 private funds and 13,013 mutual funds. Most new funds launched in the past year focus on equities, fund-of-funds, aggregator funds, continuation funds, private debt, digital assets and tokenised funds. The use of subscription line facilities and net asset value loans by private equity funds continues to be a popular tool in capital raising.
Types of Alternative Funds
The Cayman Islands imposes no restrictions on the types of investment funds that can be established. The types most commonly established include:
Investment funds are classified as either open-ended (ie, voluntary redemptions/withdrawals permitted) or closed-ended (ie, voluntary redemptions/withdrawals not permitted).
Fund Structures
The Cayman Islands offer a wide range of investment vehicles for the establishment of investment fund structures. These include:
The type of investment vehicle utilised for a fund structure depends on the needs of fund promoters and proposed investors. When deciding on what type of vehicle and structure to use, tax considerations typically factor into the analysis. Cultural factors are also often taken into account, as it is usually desirable to choose a vehicle or structure with which potential investors are already familiar and therefore comfortable investing in.
Typical structures include the following.
Standalone
The simplest structure is a standalone investment fund. Under this structure, investors simply purchase equity interests in a single vehicle.
Multi-class or umbrella
Multi-class funds split shares or units into different classes, each with different investment objectives and pools of underlying investments. Such funds are often established as segregated portfolio companies.
Side-by-side or parallel
Side-by-side fund structures usually involve the establishment of a standalone onshore fund and a standalone Cayman Islands fund. Under this structure, the onshore and Cayman Islands funds each make identical investments in assets managed by the same investment manager.
Master/feeder
Master/feeder structures typically involve three investment fund vehicles:
Under this structure, the onshore and offshore feeder funds invest in the master fund, which utilises the proceeds of such investments to acquire a pool of assets. Usually, these structures allow US investors to invest in the offshore master fund through the onshore feeder fund and US tax-exempt and non-US investors to invest in the offshore master fund through the offshore feeder fund. In some cases, only two investment fund vehicles are used, with US investors investing in the onshore feeder and US tax-exempt and non-US investors investing directly in the offshore master fund.
Fund-of-funds
This term describes investment objectives rather than structures. A fund-of-funds has the investment objective of investing its investment capital in other investment funds.
Evergreen or hybrid structures
Open-ended funds are typically established as evergreen vehicles; however, evergreen closed-ended funds are increasingly being launched to provide investors with periodic subscription and redemption opportunities while investing primarily in illiquid assets. These structures are particularly popular for private credit, infrastructure and certain real estate strategies and are often targeted at a broader investor base, including private wealth channels.
Hybrid structures are also becoming more prevalent, combining features of traditional open-ended and closed-ended funds. For example, hybrid funds may have limited redemption rights, periodic liquidity windows or continuation vehicle features to accommodate long-term investment strategies while offering investors a degree of liquidity.
Open-ended funds are regulated pursuant to the Mutual Funds Act (MFA) and closed-ended funds are regulated pursuant to the Private Funds Act (PFA).
The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) is the regulatory authority in the Cayman Islands.
The MFA
A “mutual fund” is defined as an investment vehicle that issues “equity interests” allowing participation by a pool of investors in the profits or gains from such vehicle’s investments.
An “equity interest” means a share in a company, an LLC interest in a limited liability company, a unit in a unit trust, an interest in a partnership or any other representation of an interest that carries an entitlement to participate in profits or gains of such entity and which is redeemable or repurchasable at the option of the investor.
Therefore, to trigger the MFA, an investment vehicle must permit investors to withdraw/redeem at their option and investor funds must be pooled.
Broadly speaking, there are four categories of mutual funds under the MFA:
Another subcategory is master funds. A master fund must have one or more regulated feeder funds (ie, one of the four categories listed above) either directly or through an intermediary entity established to invest in it.
Limited investor funds
A limited investor fund is a mutual fund with the following characteristics:
Limited investor funds are not required to have a prescribed minimum initial investment amount, nor is there any requirement to appoint an administrator, although limited investor funds are required to register with CIMA by:
All limited investor funds must have their audited financial statements prepared or signed off by an approved Cayman Islands auditor and filed with CIMA within six months of their financial year end.
Registered funds
Registered funds are the most common form of mutual funds in the Cayman Islands. For a registered mutual fund, the initial minimum subscription per investor must be at least USD100,000 (or equivalent) or the equity interests must be listed on an approved stock exchange (including an over-the-counter market).
A registered mutual fund is not required to be licensed. Instead, it must register with CIMA by filing its offering document and certain prescribed details relating to the offering of its equity interests.
Fees are payable to CIMA on registration and annually thereafter.
All registered mutual funds must appoint an administrator and have their audited financial statements prepared or signed off by an approved Cayman Islands auditor and filed with CIMA within six months of their financial year end, along with an annual return in the prescribed form.
Administered funds
A mutual fund will be an administered mutual fund if its principal office in the Cayman Islands is provided by a Cayman Islands licensed mutual fund administrator. No minimum initial investment amount is prescribed. The registration process for an administered mutual fund is the same as for a registered mutual fund, except it must file an additional form with CIMA signed by the Cayman Islands-licensed mutual fund administrator.
Licensed funds (also known as “retail funds”)
Licensed mutual funds are the rarest form of mutual funds regulated under the MFA.
Unless a mutual fund falls within one of the other categories described above, it must obtain a mutual fund licence, which involves a prior approval process requiring CIMA to be satisfied that the promoter is of sound reputation and that the administration of the fund will be undertaken by persons with sufficient expertise and who are fit and proper to act in their respective positions.
All licensed mutual funds must have a registered office in the Cayman Islands or, in the case of a unit trust, must have a locally licensed trustee.
A limited investor fund, a registered mutual fund or an administered mutual fund can voluntarily choose to be licensed.
Master funds
Any Cayman Islands investment vehicle that issues equity interests and has a dedicated feeder fund regulated by CIMA investing in it must register as a master fund. The registration requirements are less onerous and do not require a master fund to file an offering document.
The PFA
A “private fund” is defined as a company, unit trust or partnership that offers or issues (or has issued) investment interests, the purpose or effect of which is the pooling of investor funds to with the aim of enabling investors to receive profit or gains from such entity’s acquisition, holding, management or disposal of investments, where:
As the definition of “private fund” is so broad, the PFA includes a list of “non-fund arrangements” that are not considered private funds and are therefore outside the scope of the PFA.
A private fund must do the following (among other things).
The MFA
Registered funds, administered funds and licensed funds are required to file an offering document with CIMA. The MFA requires the offering document to describe the equity interests in all material respects and to contain such other information as is necessary to enable a prospective investor to make an informed decision asbou to whether or not to subscribe for such equity interests.
In addition, CIMA has issued a Rule on Contents of Offering Documents – Regulated Mutual Funds, which sets out the information that must be included in offering documents issued by mutual funds. Such information includes details regarding:
The PFA
The PFA does not require a private fund to prepare an offering document. However, CIMA does require, at a minimum, a summary of terms to be filed at the time of registration. Any offering document, marketing materials or summary of terms used by a private fund must comply with CIMA’s Rule on Contents of Marketing Material – Registered Private Funds. The information required under this Rule is similar to the information required under the Rule on Contents of Offering Documents – Regulated Mutual Funds, which is summarised above.
Any offering documents, marketing materials or summary of terms filed with CIMA are not publicly available.
Beneficial Ownership Regime
The Beneficial Ownership Transparency Act (BOTA) and accompanying Regulations and Guidance require Cayman companies and partnerships to maintain and file a beneficial ownership register with the Cayman Islands Registrar. Mutual funds and private funds registered with CIMA can opt for an alternative route to compliance (namely, filing certain required particulars rather than maintaining a beneficial ownership register (BOR)).
Cayman Islands registered funds can nominate a contact person to hold up-to-date information on their beneficial owners that can be provided to the Cayman Islands Registrar within 24 hours of any request. The contact person must be a Cayman Islands fund administrator or other entity licensed by CIMA. Where a contact person is nominated, their details will appear on the fund’s BOR instead of the fund’s investors or controllers.
The Cayman Islands levies no capital gains, income, profits, corporation or withholding taxes (whether on the investment fund or its investors or managers).
If the investment fund is incorporated as an exempted company, it can obtain an undertaking from the Cayman Islands government that it will remain tax-free for up to 30 years; in the case of a limited liability company, exempted trust or exempted limited partnership, the period is up to 50 years.
Cayman Islands funds may originate loans and invest in consumer credit and other loan portfolios. No restrictions or rules apply solely because a fund engages in these activities.
The lending activities of a Cayman fund do not, in themselves, generally require the fund to obtain a licence in the Cayman Islands.
There are no restrictions on the types of assets in which a Cayman Islands fund may invest, including digital assets, cannabis/cannabis-related investments and litigation funding.
However, when structuring a Cayman Islands fund, you must consider certain Cayman Islands laws to ensure full compliance. These include:
Digital Assets
A fund could trigger the VASP Act, requiring registration or licensing under such Act, if it provides virtual asset services that fall outside traditional fund activities. “Virtual asset services” include the issuance of virtual assets, custody of virtual assets or the transfer/exchange of virtual assets, for or on behalf of others.
The VASP Act defines virtual assets as “a digital representation of value that can be digitally traded or transferred and can be used for payment or investment purposes but does not include a digital representation of fiat currencies”. This definition captures all payment tokens, cryptocurrencies and other digital assets that are tradable or transferable, except digital fiat currencies. Where tokens have qualities that constitute securities, they may be separately regulated under the Securities Investment Business Act (“SIBA”), although the VASP Act may apply in parallel. Virtual service tokens which provide access to a software platform rather than serving a payment or investment purpose are expressly excluded from the definition of virtual assets. The VASP Amendment Act 2025 confirmed, with retroactive effect, that the tokenisation of equity or investment interests in regulated Cayman funds does not constitute the issuance of virtual assets under the VASP Act.
Cannabis
Under the Misuse of Drugs Act, it is an offence to have dealings in controlled drugs (including cannabis). The Cayman Islands has made advances in permitting the use of medical cannabis where prescribed by a medical doctor; however, it remains an offence to cultivate, sell, distribute or possess cannabis for recreational and other purposes.
Under the Proceeds of Crime Act, a Cayman Islands entity risks committing an offence if it deals with or acquires the proceeds of criminal conduct (which would include dealings with cannabis that amount to an offence under the Misuse of Drugs Act). However, this may not be an offence under Cayman Islands law where the dealings with cannabis occurred outside the Cayman Islands and are not an offence under the laws of the country where they occurred.
Litigation Funding
The Private Funding of Legal Services Act, 2020 introduced a statutory framework for conditional fee agreements, contingency fee agreements and litigation funding agreements. Such a statutory framework would need to be considered for any Cayman Islands law-governed fee/funding agreements to be entered into by a litigation funding fund.
It is common to use subsidiaries as holding vehicles to segregate assets and also as blockers for tax purposes.
Co-investment vehicles are also widely used, particularly by private equity, private credit, infrastructure and real estate sponsors.
A Cayman Islands fund is not required to have a Cayman Islands investment manager.
Other Local Requirements
All Cayman Islands investment funds are required to maintain a registered office in the Cayman Islands.
Corporate funds are not required to have local directors; however, a fund structured as an exempted limited partnership must have at least one “qualifying” general partner that is a person or entity resident, incorporated or registered in the Cayman Islands. Therefore, an exempted limited partnership must have a general partner that is either:
Cayman Islands funds are not required to maintain any business premises in the Cayman Islands (other than the registered office noted above), to hire local employees or to satisfy any other substance requirements.
Each individual director of a mutual fund regulated under the MFA must register with CIMA under the Directors Registration and Licensing Act and must update their registration annually. Professional directors (a person appointed to 20 or more covered entities) and corporate directors (a body corporate appointed as a director for a covered entity) must be licensed under that Act. The Directors Registration and Licensing Act does not apply to:
Cayman Islands funds are not required to have any service providers located in the Cayman Islands, except as follows:
Non-local service providers, including administrators, custodians and investment managers, will not be subject to Cayman Islands regulation/registration requirements as long as they do not establish a place of business in the Cayman Islands and do not conduct business from or within the Cayman Islands.
No changes are currently anticipated.
A Cayman Islands fund is not required to have a Cayman Islands investment manager; therefore, investment managers for Cayman Islands funds are usually not located in the Cayman Islands.
Investment managers for Cayman Islands funds are based across the globe, including in North America, Europe, Asia and Latin America.
The Cayman Islands offers a wide range of vehicles for establishing investment managers and while companies are the most popular, the type of vehicle utilised will depend on familiarity, preference and onshore tax considerations.
Where Cayman Islands vehicles are used for a fund’s manager, they allow flexible equity incentive arrangements for equity holders through bespoke constitutional documents and shareholder agreements. A remuneration policy is required for the governing body and certain employees of a Cayman Islands licensed or registered investment manager, which must:
The principal Cayman Islands legislation applicable to alternative fund managers is SIBA. SIBA provides for the licensing and control of persons engaged in a securities investment business activity (which would typically include activity undertaken by investment managers) in or from the Cayman Islands.
SIBA regulates dealing in, arranging, managing or advising on securities, which are broadly defined and include equity interests, debt interests, warrants, futures, options, contracts for differences and virtual assets representing such securities. Anyone carrying on a “securities investment business” must apply to CIMA for a licence unless they can rely on an exemption.
Exemption from licensing is available if services are to be provided by a Cayman Islands investment manager solely to funds falling within the following categories of persons:
Although a licence is not required for the above-listed exemptions, an investment manager availing of them must register with CIMA and update that registration annually. Cayman Islands funds managers are also required to comply with anti-money laundering obligations and, unless an exemption applies, with FATCA/CRS obligations under Cayman Islands law.
SIBA registered fund managers should also comply with CIMA-published rules and statements of guidance and have in place policies and procedures in respect of:
There are no current registration/licensing requirements for parties conducting securities investment business who are not Cayman Islands entities and who are not conducting securities investment business from an established place of business in the Cayman Islands.
No specific disclosures are required for Cayman Islands fund managers, but a Cayman Islands fund’s offering documents are required to include:
Beneficial Ownership Regime
BOTA requires all legal persons (including Cayman incorporated or registered fund managers) to maintain a BOR, including certain required particulars in respect of their beneficial owners. A fund manager that is licensed under SIBA would be able to benefit from an alternative route to compliance and provide details of the regulatory law under which it is licensed rather than maintain a BOR.
Beneficial owners are individuals, Cayman Islands entities or, as applicable, trustees of trusts that:
Where no such registrable beneficial owner can be identified, a senior managing official should be included on the BOR as the contact person (ie, a director or chief executive officer).
The BOR must be maintained with current and up-to-date information with the legal person’s corporate services provider.
Please see 2.4 Tax Regime for Funds.
The Cayman Islands has no rules regarding permanent establishments or other taxable presences. Please also see 2.4 Tax Regime for Funds.
Please see 2.4 Tax Regime for Funds.
Managers can outsource investment functions or business operations.
CIMA has issued a Statement of Guidance setting out its minimum expectations for outsourcing material functions or activities, as well as outsourcing arrangements for SIBA registered/licensed managers and certain other CIMA regulated entities. Some of the key provisions include the requirement to:
If a Cayman Islands alternative fund manager provides discretionary fund management services to an investment fund, economic substance requirements may apply pursuant to the International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Act (the “ES Act”).
Economic substance requirements are satisfied by an entity in the case of the following.
The ES Act permits the outsourcing of activities to service providers in the Cayman Islands and such outsourcing could aid in satisfying some of the economic substance requirements. See also 3.7 Outsourcing of Investment Functions/Business Operations.
Economic substance requirements do not apply to:
Satisfying the economic substance requirements will be a question of fact. There is no one-size-fits-all approach and much depends on the size and scope of the business (both in the Cayman Islands and in other locations) and the expected gross income in the Cayman Islands.
Under Cayman Islands law, no regulatory or investor approvals are required for a merger, sale, restructuring or similar transaction involving a SIBA-registered fund manager or its parent company. Notice of any such change has to be provided to CIMA within 21 days.
However, if the fund manager is licensed with CIMA, CIMA’s prior approval is required for any transactions involving a change of control of the licensed fund manager.
No regulatory requirements or limitations in connection with the use of artificial intelligence, predictive data or big data exist in the Cayman Islands; however, any use of generative AI software, tools or technologies (including natural language processing, deep-learning algorithms or machine-learning models) must comply with the requirements of the Cayman Islands Data Protection Act (DPA).
The DPA is drafted around a set of EU-style data protection principles that data controllers must adhere to. Personal data must be collected only for specified lawful purposes, processed fairly and in accordance with rights of data subjects and must be protected by appropriate technical and organisational mechanisms. Any personal data collected must be adequate, kept up to date and not retained longer than necessary to fulfil the collection purpose. Importantly, the DPA provides a standard framework for both public and private entities in the management of the personal data they use.
Draft amendments to SIBA were published for industry consultation on 17 September 2025 with the intention of increasing regulation and enhancing supervision of registered persons. A revised draft was subsequently issued on 7 May 2026 and continues the consultation from September 2025.
Owing to the reasons set out in 1.1 General Overview of Jurisdiction, the Cayman Islands is the leading jurisdiction for investment funds, with over 30,000 regulated funds as of Q2 2026. Generally, no special requirements or restrictions with respect to investors investing into Cayman Islands funds exist; as a result, Cayman Islands funds attract investors from around the world. However, owing to various regulatory and disclosure requirements in the USA, US-taxable investors are the least common for Cayman funds.
Side letters are permitted and are widely used by Cayman Islands funds. For a side letter to be valid and enforceable, the fund’s constitutional documents must allow it. Additionally, the scope of the side letter must fall within the side letter disclosure provisions in the offering/constitutional documents and – for companies – must not modify existing shareholder rights enshrined in the fund’s constitutional documents.
CIMA’s Rules on the Contents of Offering Documents – Regulated Mutual Funds and the Contents of Marketing Material – Registered Private Funds require offering documents/marketing materials to include a statement confirming the power to enter into side letters that bind the fund and that contain any terms the effects of which provide an investor with more favourable treatment than other holders of the same class of interest, enhancing that investor’s ability to either:
There is no requirement to offer side letters to investors in a Cayman Islands fund.
Non-Cayman Islands Funds
A non-Cayman Islands fund is permitted to market without restrictions in the Cayman Islands provided the offering is limited generally to the following types of persons/entities:
If offering to persons/entities who are not Permitted Offerees, the non-Cayman Islands fund will be required to either:
Cayman Islands Funds
The investment vehicles (eg, exempted companies, exempted limited partnerships or limited liability companies) commonly used to structure Cayman Islands funds are not permitted to undertake business with persons in the Cayman Islands, except for the furtherance of the business of the fund carried on exterior to the Cayman Islands.
Consequently, Cayman funds, unless they are listed on the Cayman stock exchange, are not permitted to offer interests to the “public in the Cayman Islands”. Permitted Offerees are not included in the definition of “public in the Cayman Islands” and such persons are permitted to invest in Cayman Islands funds.
Depending on the nature of the activities, any firm marketing or advertising funds from or into the Cayman Islands might trigger SIBA. Please see 3.3 Regulatory Regime for Managers.
Although no regulatory filings are required for marketing, CIMA has issued a Marketing Policy applicable only to licensed funds. This policy requires licensed funds to refrain from using aggressive marketing policies based exclusively or primarily on confidentiality or secrecy to attract business. Licensed funds are also expected to demonstrate a high level of responsibility in the marketing of all their services.
While no product or distribution channel is exclusively tailored for high net worth investors, the regulatory framework governing investment funds in the Cayman Islands is primarily designed to attract institutional and high net worth clientele. As noted in 1.1 General Overview of Jurisdiction, Cayman-based funds offer a variety of advantages that make them particularly attractive to high net worth investors.
Although the Cayman Islands is not traditionally recognised as a retail fund jurisdiction, with licensed funds being the least common category of regulated mutual funds, there has been a noticeable shift. The rise of digital platforms has made it easier for retail investors to access Cayman-based funds. These platforms reduce the minimum investment requirements, often through fractionalised ownership or tokenised assets, thus opening up access to alternative investment strategies typically offered by Cayman funds.
There are no Cayman-specific products or distribution channels designed specifically to provide pension or self-directed retirement plan investors with access to alternative investment strategies.
See 4.5 High Net Worth or Retail Investors in connection with marketing non-Cayman Islands funds in the Cayman Islands. The Cayman Islands has no specific legal requirements or limitations governing reverse solicitation.
The use of placement agents is permitted and common for Cayman Islands funds.
Acting as a placement agent in or from the Cayman Islands will generally constitute “securities investment business” and will trigger SIBA requirements. Please see 3.3 Regulatory Regime for Managers.
No restrictions or special rules apply to compensation of a manager’s personnel for sales efforts.
Please see 2.4 Tax Regime for Funds.
The Cayman Islands has no double tax treaties. The Cayman Islands is tax-neutral and therefore does not require tax treaties, as there is no tax conflict and no risk of double taxation.
The Cayman Islands is a signatory to the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement to implement the OECD Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information – Common Reporting Standard (CRS) and to an inter-governmental agreement with the United States to improve international tax compliance and implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (the “US IGA”). The Cayman Islands has enacted laws and regulations to give effect to the CRS and the US IGA (the “AEOI Laws”) and has published guidance notes on the application of the AEOI Laws in the Cayman Islands.
The AEOI Laws have established a financial account information reporting regime in the Cayman Islands. All Cayman Islands entities classified as reporting financial institutions under the AEOI Laws must comply with registration, due diligence and annual reporting obligations, including the requirements to:
The TIA transmits reported information annually to the relevant overseas authorities.
Most Cayman Islands funds will be classified as reporting financial institutions for the purposes of the AEOI Laws and will be required to comply with the registration, due diligence and annual reporting obligations under the Cayman Islands AEOI regime. Cayman Islands funds are permitted to delegate some or all of their responsibilities under the AEOI Laws to third-party service providers.
Cayman Islands funds are subject to:
To ensure compliance with the Cayman AML Regulations, Cayman Islands funds are required to adopt and maintain appropriate policies and procedures and require investors to verify:
Cayman Islands funds must also appoint individuals as the money-laundering reporting officer, deputy money-laundering reporting officer and anti-money-laundering compliance officer.
Where permitted and subject to certain conditions, Cayman Islands funds may rely on a suitable person for the maintenance of their anti-money laundering, anti-terrorism and anti-proliferation financing policies and procedures or may otherwise delegate such functions to a suitable person.
CIMA has a discretionary power to impose substantial administrative fines upon a fund in connection with any breaches of prescribed provisions of the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations and upon any operator or officer of the fund who consented to or connived in the breach or to whose neglect the breach is proved to be attributable.
Investors in funds increasingly require and demand data privacy. As obligations to collect personal data increase under new international data-sharing regimes, fund managers must pay close attention to data protection issues. These international obligations, along with cybersecurity concerns and innovative technology deployments, are making personal data regulation more complex than ever.
The Data Protection Act (DPA) regulates the processing of all personal data in the Cayman Islands. Drafted around a set of internationally recognised privacy principles, the DPA provides a framework of rights and duties designed to give individuals greater control over their personal data. Importantly, the DPA supports a growing expectation from international businesses and their clients that organisations operating in offshore jurisdictions have comprehensive data protection compliance requirements in place, backed up by robust data privacy legislation.
Personal data is defined widely to include any data relating to a living individual who can be identified. The average fund generates and retains large amounts of personal data. Fund managers may hold proprietary research and investment strategies, high-value email and contact lists and net worth information for individuals. Under the DPA, the fund must process all personal data fairly and lawfully and use it for a legitimate purpose. Personal data holdings should not be excessive in relation to the purposes for which they are collected and should be securely purged once those purposes have been fulfilled.
Data subjects should receive a privacy notice that can be included in the fund’s subscription documents, setting out the types of personal data processed, the purposes and legal bases of processing, transfers of personal data between jurisdictions, retention periods and data subject rights.
Contractual provisions should be put in place between the fund (as the data controller) and the third-party service provider (as the data processor) to ensure that:
Use of subcontractors by the service provider should be prohibited without the prior approval of the fund.
No changes are currently anticipated.
9th Floor
60 Nexus Way
Camana Bay
PO Box 190
Grand Cayman KY1-1104
Cayman Islands
+1 345 814 2054
salla@applebyglobal.com www.applebyglobal.com
Market Trends
The Cayman Islands’ alternative funds market continues its trend of expansion. Data published by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) shows 13,013 regulated mutual funds and 18,132 registered private funds at the end of Q2 2026. This compares with 12,876 mutual funds and 17,722 private funds at the end of 2025.
These figures indicate that demand for Cayman fund structures remains strong, although they do not reveal how the terms of those structures are changing. Slower private market exits, more selective fundraising and closer investor scrutiny are influencing the terms on which capital is raised, deployed and returned, contributing to demand for secondaries and financing solutions that generate liquidity without requiring an immediate sale of the underlying investments.
Evergreen structures
Evergreen and semi-liquid structures continue to attract interest, particularly for private credit and other strategies capable of generating recurring income. They allow capital to remain invested without the timetable associated with a succession of fixed-life funds. Depending on the strategy, investors may subscribe during scheduled dealing periods, while redemptions are controlled through contractual limitations designed to reflect the liquidity of the underlying portfolio. Unlike a conventional closed-ended fund, an evergreen fund does not operate according to a fixed fundraising, investment and realisation cycle.
For managers, the principal attraction is the ability to retain investments for as long as the investment thesis requires, rather than realise them as the fund approaches the end of its term. Realised capital can be redeployed, while investors obtain exposure that is not tied to a single fund vintage. This may be particularly attractive in private credit, where committed capital can be deployed comparatively quickly and investors and managers may prefer reinvestment to returning to the market every few years for a successor fund.
Evergreen does not necessarily mean fully liquid. A fund investing in illiquid assets will generally need to restrict the frequency or value of redemptions through a combination of notice periods, lock-ups, redemption gates and other liquidity management tools. The central structuring question is whether the liquidity offered to investors is compatible with the liquidity of the fund’s portfolio, and the documents should not promise liquidity that the portfolio cannot realistically support. Nor should an evergreen model developed for private credit be transferred without adaptation to venture capital, private equity or another strategy with a different pattern of valuation and realisation.
Private credit
Higher financing costs and changes in bank lending appetite continue to create opportunities for direct lending, asset-backed credit and other structured lending strategies. Established alternative asset managers and multi-manager platforms are responding by expanding their credit capabilities, increasing competition for origination, portfolio acquisitions and financing opportunities. Depending on the investor base and expected pattern of repayments, a fund may be structured as a conventional closed-ended drawdown vehicle or as an evergreen product offering limited periodic liquidity.
Private credit illustrates why the distinction between income and liquidity matters. A loan may generate regular cash flow while remaining difficult to realise at or near its reported value due to transfer restrictions, limited secondary demand or valuation uncertainty. Any redemption rights should therefore reflect the fund’s cash reserves, borrowing capacity and the time needed to realise assets without disadvantaging investors who remain in the fund.
Secondaries and alternative liquidity solutions
Slower exits are continuing to encourage a wider range of secondary transactions and other alternative liquidity arrangements. These include limited partner-led sales, general partner-led continuation transactions and financing solutions that allow investors or funds to retain exposure to assets rather than sell them into an unreceptive market. In a continuation transaction, selected portfolio investments are acquired by a newly formed vehicle, and investors in the selling fund may be offered cash, an interest in the new structure or a combination of the two.
The manager may act on both sides of the transaction or continue to receive management fees and carried interest in respect of the transferred assets. The governing body should be able to demonstrate how the transfer price was established, how conflicts were addressed, and why the options presented to investors were consistent with the fund’s governing documents. The appropriate process will depend on the fund documents and the nature of the conflict. Depending on the transaction, the process may include engagement with an investor advisory committee, independent valuation support or a fairness opinion. These measures do not eliminate the conflict, but they can support decisions by the fund’s governing body and give investors a clearer basis on which to assess their options.
Activity is not confined to traditional private equity portfolios. Credit secondaries are developing as investors seek liquidity from increasingly substantial private credit allocations and managers look to acquire seasoned portfolios with an established payment history. These transactions can require careful analysis of transfer restrictions, borrower consents, confidentiality obligations, valuation methodology and the treatment of accrued income.
Bespoke mandates and single investor funds
Institutional investors are increasingly seeking mandates designed around their own investment restrictions and reporting requirements, rather than investing solely through commingled funds. This has contributed to greater use of funds of one, co-investment vehicles and other single investor arrangements. In a single investor fund, matters such as concentration limits and consent rights can be negotiated directly with the investor, providing greater influence over the mandate than would ordinarily be available in a commingled fund.
For managers, a bespoke vehicle can strengthen a relationship with a cornerstone investor and provide a platform for future opportunities. It can provide the investor with access to a particular strategy, asset or group of transactions without requiring it to accept all of the economic and governance terms offered to the wider market. Where the structure and operating arrangements have been established in advance, additional investment opportunities may be accommodated without renegotiating the terms of a broader commingled product.
Bespoke single investor funds nevertheless require careful consideration within the context of the manager’s wider platform. Investment allocation and fee arrangements may create conflicts between the tailored mandate and other funds pursuing similar strategies, particularly if they bear different fees or have different investment restrictions. The allocation policy should address how competing claims to an investment opportunity will be resolved where both vehicles are eligible to participate.
Fund level NAV financing and hybrid capital
The use of net asset value-based financing by individual funds continues to increase, notwithstanding higher borrowing costs. These facilities are generally supported by the value and cash flows of a fund’s investment portfolio, rather than by uncalled investor commitments, and may provide liquidity pending an exit, support follow-on investments or facilitate distributions to investors. They can be particularly useful where a manager does not wish to sell an asset in an unreceptive market, and the lender may itself be a private credit fund rather than a bank.
The use of an NAV facility raises questions concerning leverage limits, asset coverage, concentration risk, lender enforcement rights and the respective interests of investors at different stages of the fund’s life. Managers and financing providers are also exploring hybrid capital instruments that combine debt-like economics with equity features, including instruments designed around redemption rights and distributions rather than conventional maturity dates and interest payments.
Insurance capital and collateralised fund obligations
Insurance companies are becoming an increasingly important source of capital for private funds and private credit strategies. This is encouraging the development of rated feeder structures and collateralised fund obligations, through which interests in a portfolio of private funds or other private market assets support the issuance of rated notes and, potentially, an equity tranche. A principal attraction for certain insurance investors is that rated debt may receive more favourable risk-based capital treatment than a direct investment in a private fund, allowing private market exposure to be aligned more closely with regulatory capital and liability management requirements.
These arrangements require close consideration of portfolio eligibility, diversification, cash flow waterfalls, valuation, liquidity, noteholder rights and the relationship between the issuer, feeder and underlying funds. Cayman vehicles may be used at different levels of the structure, depending on the investor base, tax considerations and the location of the asset manager. The trend is also contributing to closer relationships between insurers and asset managers, including strategic partnerships, acquisitions and arrangements under which an asset manager originates or manages investments against an insurer’s liabilities.
Infrastructure and AI-related investment
Infrastructure strategies are attracting capital as the development of artificial intelligence increases demand for data centres, power generation, energy storage, cooling systems and digital connectivity. These projects may require substantial and long-dated capital, creating opportunities for infrastructure, private credit and hybrid capital funds. Their scale and development risk can also lead to bespoke co-investment, joint venture and financing arrangements.
Family offices
Family offices are becoming a more significant part of Cayman’s alternative investment market, with the expectation that Cayman is one of the jurisdictions likely to experience some of the greatest growth globally in family offices and family wealth structuring over the next few years.
The trend extends beyond the use of Cayman entities to hold investments, as more wealthy families establish a local presence and use Cayman structures for investment governance, succession planning and cross-border asset management. From an alternative funds perspective, family offices may establish bespoke or single investor vehicles, participate in co-investments, and provide patient capital to private equity, private credit and infrastructure strategies. They are also emerging as both borrowers against concentrated or illiquid portfolios and investors in the equity or subordinated tranches of collateralised fund structures.
Alongside these market trends, the Cayman alternative fund sector has recently seen significant legislative and regulatory change. Three developments are particularly relevant to Cayman Islands investment funds in 2026: the introduction of a new statutory framework for tokenised funds, new CIMA rules relating to compliance programmes, and the implementation of CRS 2.0.
Legal and Regulatory Developments
New statutory framework for tokenised funds
The Cayman Islands recently enacted legislation to provide greater regulatory clarity for tokenised investment fund structures. The new statutory framework came into force on 24 March 2026 and amended the Mutual Funds Act (2025 Revision) (the Mutual Funds Act), the Private Funds Act (2025 Revision) (the Private Funds Act) and the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act (2024 Revision) (the VASP Act).
A tokenised fund represents its equity or investment interests through digital tokens recorded on a distributed ledger. A tokenised fund’s investments need not be digital assets but may be traditional fund assets such as real estate, credit assets or private equity investments.
The new framework removes uncertainty around the regulatory treatment of investment fund structures whose equity or investment interests are represented by digital tokens using blockchain or similar distributed ledger technology, and follows an extensive consultation process with the financial services industry and CIMA. Under the new framework, the underlying legal rights and investor protections remain unchanged, but tokenisation may offer efficiencies in record keeping, transfer controls, settlement processes and investor onboarding.
Prior to the introduction of this bespoke legislative regime, there had been uncertainty as to whether issuing digital tokens representing fund interests constituted a “virtual asset issuance” under the VASP Act. That classification would have fundamentally altered the regulatory treatment of tokenised funds, bringing them within the scope of the regulatory regime under the VASP Act, which was not designed for investment funds.
The amendments clarify that tokenised investment fund structures are most appropriately regulated within the existing framework of the Mutual Funds Act and the Private Funds Act, with the targeted amendments having been made to support technological innovation while maintaining investor protection and anti-money laundering standards. The VASP Act was also amended to clarify that issuance of tokenised interests by a tokenised fund is regulated under Cayman Islands funds legislation rather than the virtual asset issuance regime. It should be noted, however, that tokenised funds that provide virtual asset services to third parties (such as custody, exchange or transfer services) will remain fully within the scope of the VASP Act.
The new regime imposes additional obligations on tokenised funds and their operators, including obligations to securely maintain records relating to the issuance, creation, sale, transfer and ownership of tokenised fund interests, to make those records available to CIMA upon request and to provide CIMA with an annual confirmation of compliance with the applicable record keeping obligations.
The new framework also requires that tokenised fund interests only be transferable with the approval of the fund’s operator in accordance with the fund’s offering document. The fund’s offering document must also contain appropriate disclosures of any risks specific to the digital tokens representing the fund interests (including considerations regarding cybersecurity and transferability) and set out how those risks are addressed or mitigated for investors.
CIMA’s supervisory powers with respect to a tokenised fund include the power to inspect the digital technology underlying the fund and its digital token transactions.
New anti-money laundering and sanctions rules
In July 2026, CIMA published two new rules: the Rule on Effective Compliance Programme for the Prevention and Detection of Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Proliferation Financing for Financial Services Providers (the Compliance Programme Rule) and the Rule on Compliance with Financial Sanctions and Targeted Financial Sanctions (the Sanctions Rule).
These new rules came into force on 18 September 2026 and apply to all Cayman Islands investment funds regulated by CIMA. It should be noted that the Compliance Programme Rule and the Sanctions Rule do not apply directly to investment funds that are not subject to CIMA licensing or registration requirements (such as single investor funds, which fall outside the registration requirements under both the Mutual Funds Act and the Private Funds Act). However, such funds will nevertheless remain subject to applicable requirements under the Cayman Islands Anti-Money Laundering Regulations and other existing Cayman Islands regulations relating to sanctions and combatting terrorism and proliferation financing.
The Compliance Programme Rule prescribes the minimum components of an effective compliance programme for preventing and detecting money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation financing. These include written policies and procedures, periodic effectiveness testing (ie, independent audit procedures), ongoing training, a documented risk management framework and the appointment of an anti-money laundering compliance officer with responsibility for implementing and overseeing the programme. Although the Compliance Programme Rule introduces new obligations, many of its requirements overlap with CIMA’s existing guidance on implementing the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations.
The Sanctions Rule requires sanctions compliance to form part of the regulated fund’s wider compliance programme. Among other things, the fund must maintain appropriate policies, systems and controls, address sanctions in its risk assessments, meet applicable asset freezing and reporting obligations, maintain records of potential and confirmed matches and provide appropriate training to its staff.
The key areas in which CIMA’s new rules introduce new requirements, or clarify existing requirements, for regulated investment funds include the following.
Updates to the Cayman Islands CRS regime
The Cayman Islands implements the Common Reporting Standard (CRS or the Standard), a global standard for the automatic exchange of financial account information to combat tax evasion developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (the OECD), pursuant to regulations made under the Tax Information Authority Act (2021 Revision) (the CRS Regulations).
Cayman Islands reporting financial institutions, including most Cayman Islands investment funds, are subject to due diligence and annual reporting obligations, including filing an annual CRS compliance form, with the Cayman Islands Tax Information Authority (the TIA), which, in turn, exchanges account information on an automatic basis with authorities in over 100 other jurisdictions.
The amendments took effect on 1 January 2026 and implemented the first major update to the CRS since its adoption by the OECD in 2014, commonly referred to as “CRS 2.0”. The changes incorporate the OECD amendments adopted in August 2022 and make separate changes to the Cayman implementation of the CRS, including its reporting deadlines and service provider requirements.
Key changes introduced by the amendments to the CRS Regulations are as follows.
CRS 2.0 expands the definition of “Financial Assets” to include electronic money and central bank digital currencies, which were not expressly covered by the previous framework. Of particular importance for Cayman Islands investment funds (which are usually classified as “Investment Entities” under the Standard), the definition of “Investment Entity” has been expanded to include entities that invest in, administer, manage or trade in “Relevant Crypto-Assets”.
The Cayman Islands Department for International Tax Cooperation recently issued new self-certification forms to align with the updated requirements under the amended CRS 2.0 regulations.
It is worth noting that CRS 2.0 sits alongside the OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework, commonly referred to as “CARF”. CARF imposes transaction reporting requirements on in-scope crypto-asset service providers, whereas CRS 2.0 expands the financial account reporting regime to address certain digital money products and indirect investments in crypto-assets. The two regimes are intended to operate alongside one another while limiting duplicative reporting.
94 Solaris Avenue
Camana Bay
PO Box 1348
Grand Cayman KY1 1108
Cayman Islands
+1 345 949 4123
caymanislands@mourant.com www.mourant.com