An employee is a person who has entered into or works under a contract of service with an employer. On the other hand, a person who has entered into a contract for service is not an employee. Whether a person is an employee is determined by a flexible and fact-sensitive approach that considers, holistically, the parties’ working relationship with reference to factors such as the employer’s control over the person’s work and whether the person’s work forms an integral part of the employer’s business.
The Employment Act generally covers all employees (subject to very limited exceptions), but additional statutory protection of certain employment terms and benefits under Part IV of the Employment Act only applies to classes of employees who are considered more vulnerable in their ability to negotiate their terms of employment, as follows:
Platform Workers
Based on the recently introduced Platform Workers Bill which was passed by parliament on 10 September 2024, platform workers will be recognised as a distinct and separate group of workers. Due to the flexible nature of their work, platform workers are neither classified as employees nor self-employed. For more details on platform workers and the ongoing efforts to protect their interests, see 5.3 Other New Manifestations.
An employment contract may be for a fixed or indefinite period.
Key Employment Terms
An employer is required to provide employees (other than transient employees) with written records of at least the key employment terms, which include:
Any term of an employment contract which is less favourable than the conditions of service prescribed by the Employment Act for an employee covered under the Act is deemed to be illegal, null and void to the extent that it is less favourable.
Terms Implied in Law
In addition to the agreed employment terms, there is some indication that the Singapore courts are likely to recognise that an implied duty of mutual trust and confidence exists between employer and employee.
Working Hours and Overtime Regulations
Employees whose terms of employment are protected by the Employment Act (see 1.1 Employee Status) are not required to work more than:
If an employer requires a protected employee to work overtime, the employer has to pay the employee at least 1.5 times the employee’s hourly basic rate of pay.
In addition, a protected employee is not allowed to work overtime for more than 72 hours in a month. Working on a rest day or public holiday does not count towards the 72-hour overtime limit except for work done beyond the usual daily working hours on those days.
Part-Time Employment
An employee who is required to work fewer than 35 hours a week is considered a part-time employee. Part-time employees covered under the Employment Act are entitled to the same rights and benefits as full-time employees, but their statutory entitlements (eg, to annual leave, sick leave and maternity leave) are prorated.
Flexible Working Arrangements
The Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) – a body with representatives from the government, trade unions and employers – encourages employers to enable flexible working arrangements, which have become more accepted in the workplace.
In April 2024, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) announced that all ten recommendations by the Tripartite Workgroup on the Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests (the “FWA Guidelines”) have been accepted by the government. Employers are expected to abide by the mandatory FWA Guidelines when they come into effect on 1 December 2024. The FWA Guidelines are aimed at making it easier for employees to request flexible work arrangements, while acknowledging that employers continue to have the prerogative to decide on work arrangements.
The FWA Guidelines establish how formal flexible work arrangements requests should be made, how employers should consider such requests in a proper manner, and the requirement for employers to communicate decisions on such requests in a transparent and timely manner.
No Minimum Wage – Progressive Wage Model
There is no general minimum wage in Singapore.
However, employers in certain prescribed sectors which employ low-wage employees are required to implement a progressive wage model (PWM).
In respect of each sector, the PWM provides minimum basic wage requirements, minimum annual increases as well as the necessary certifications and qualifications that employees in these sectors would need to secure a higher minimum wage under the PWM.
The Singapore government is seeking to expand the PWM to cover more sectors over time.
National Wages Council
The National Wages Council is a tripartite body comprising representatives from employers, trade unions and the government. It formulates wage guidelines in line with Singapore’s long-term economic growth, which are used by both unionised and non-unionised companies as a framework or reference point to determine wage increases for their employees. The guidelines are recommendations, not legal requirements.
Bonuses
Bonuses are payable depending on contractual terms and employers’ discretion.
Annual Wage Supplement
The MOM encourages employers to give employees an annual wage supplement (AWS) comprising a single annual payment on top of an employee’s total annual wage, also known as a 13th-month bonus. The AWS is not compulsory, unless it is provided for in the employment contract.
Central Provident Fund (CPF) Contributions
During the 2023 Budget, it was announced that the Central Provident Fund (CPF) monthly salary ceiling will be increased. The increment will take place in four stages to allow employers and employees to adjust to the changes. The increment is as follows:
There will be no change to the current CPF annual salary ceiling of SGD102,000. This will be reviewed periodically to ensure that it continues to cover about 80% of employees.
To keep pace with rising wages and to strengthen the retirement preparedness of senior employees, there will also be changes to the CPF ordinary wage ceiling and contribution rates. As of 1 January 2024, the current contribution rates are as follows:
Public Holidays
Employees are entitled to paid holidays on public holidays. If the public holiday falls on a non-working day, employees will be entitled to another day off or one extra day’s salary in lieu of the public holiday. If an employee is required to work on a public holiday, the employee is entitled to another day off, time off (only for employees not covered under Part IV of the Employment Act), or one extra day’s salary.
Annual Leave
At the minimum, the Employment Act requires that employees who have worked for their employer for at least three months are entitled to seven days of paid annual leave within the first 12 months of continuous service with that same employer.
Thereafter, employees are entitled to one additional day of paid annual leave for every subsequent year of continuous service with the same employer, subject to a maximum of 14 days’ paid annual leave.
Sick Leave
The Employment Act requires that employees who have worked for at least three months are entitled to paid outpatient sick leave and paid hospitalisation leave.
Employees who have worked for at least six months are entitled to 14 days of paid outpatient sick leave in each year and 60 days of paid hospitalisation leave. The amount of paid outpatient sick leave and paid hospitalisation leave is capped at the amount of the employee’s sick leave entitlement.
Where an employee has worked for an employer for less than six months but for at least three months, the employee’s entitlement to paid outpatient sick leave and paid hospitalisation leave ranges from five to 11 days and 15 to 45 days respectively, depending on the length of service.
Maternity Leave
Under the Child Development Co-Savings Act 2001 (CDCA), female employees are entitled to 16 weeks of paid maternity leave provided that:
If an employee is not entitled to maternity leave under the CDCA, she will be entitled to 12 weeks of maternity leave provided that:
Eight of those 12 weeks of maternity leave will generally be paid leave unless, at the time of delivery, the employee has two or more living children and those children were born during more than one previous confinement.
Paternity Leave
Under the CDCA, male employees are generally entitled to two weeks of government-paid paternity leave provided that:
Furthermore, employers may grant an additional two weeks of government-paid paternity leave on a voluntary basis, which will be reimbursed by the government.
Paid Childcare Leave
Under the CDCA, both male and female employees are entitled to up to six days of paid childcare leave within a period of 12 months depending on their length of service, provided that:
The CDCA also provides that both male and female employees are entitled to two days of paid extended childcare leave within a period of 12 months, provided that:
However, an employee is not entitled to more than six days of childcare leave and extended childcare leave within a period of 12 months.
If an employee is not entitled to childcare leave under the CDCA, an employee covered by the Employment Act is entitled to two days of paid childcare leave within a period of 12 months provided that:
Unpaid Infant Care Leave
Under the CDCA, employees are entitled to a maximum of six days of unpaid childcare leave within a period of 12 months, regardless of the number of children, provided that:
An employee’s entitlement to unpaid infant care leave is in addition to the entitlement to paid childcare leave.
Post-termination restrictive covenants, such as non-compete and non-solicitation clauses, which impose restrictions on an employee after they have ceased working for their employer, are enforceable if they satisfy the following criteria.
The reasonableness of a restrictive covenant is assessed at the time the contract was made.
The reasonableness of a restrictive covenant will also be assessed with reference to other restrictive covenants in the employment contract. For example, if an employment contract contains a confidentiality clause and a non-solicitation clause, a court may take the view that the employer’s legitimate proprietary interest regarding its trade secrets and trade connections is sufficiently protected, and that a non-compete obligation on the employee is an unreasonable prohibition on competition, unless it can be shown that there is some other reason that necessitates the non-compete clause. This may be the case if it can be shown that the particular circumstances are such that it is much more difficult to enforce the non-solicitation clause or confidentiality clause compared to the non-compete clause.
If a restrictive covenant is found to be too wide, the court may apply a “blue pencil” test to sever parts of the clause that are unjustified. This can only be done if no words need to be altered or added and the remaining words of the clause continue to make grammatical sense.
However, it should be noted that a restrictive covenant containing cascading restrictions that are intended to accommodate the blue pencil test, or the insertion of a modification clause that provides that restrictions will be modified in order to make the covenant valid, may not save an otherwise unenforceable restrictive covenant.
The MOM and tripartite partners are currently developing a set of tripartite guidelines to shape norms and provide employers with further guidance on the inclusion of restrictive covenants in employment contracts. The MOM has said that employers should generally avoid including restrictive covenants in employment contracts for lower-paying jobs.
Enforcement
If an employee breaches a restrictive covenant, an employer can apply to court for an injunction to restrain the employee from continuing the breach. The employer can also seek damages.
The employer may also have a claim against the new employer if the new employer has induced the employee to breach the restrictive covenant clauses.
However, a restrictive covenant cannot be enforced by employers who have themselves committed a repudiatory breach of the contract that is accepted by the employee. Therefore, an employer who has wrongfully dismissed an employee cannot enforce any non-compete or non-solicitation clause.
Employees who believe that they are affected by unreasonable or unjustified restrictive covenants may seek assistance from their unions, TAFEP, or MOM.
The principles regarding restrictive covenants discussed in 2.1 Non-competes apply to non-solicitation clauses.
Non-solicitation of Customers
Clauses prohibiting the solicitation of customers protect an employer’s legitimate proprietary interest in its trade connections. For such clauses to be enforceable, there must be personal knowledge of and influence over the customers of the employer.
Non-solicitation of Employees
Clauses prohibiting the solicitation of employees protect an employer’s legitimate proprietary interest in maintaining a stable and trained workforce. The reasonableness, and consequently the enforceability, of such clauses may turn on whether the former employee has influence over the categories of employees that they are restricted from soliciting.
Applicability of the PDPA
There is no employment-specific data privacy law. In general, employee personal data is governed by the general data protection legislation in Singapore – ie, the Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (PDPA).
The PDPA governs the processing of individuals’ personal data by private sector organisations and is administered and enforced by the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC).
Under the PDPA, personal data is defined as data, whether true or not, about an individual who can be identified from that data, or from that data in conjunction with other information to which the organisation has or is likely to have access. This would include the personal data of employees (full time and part time) and job applicants.
Need to Obtain Consent From Individuals
The PDPA requires organisations to obtain consent before collecting, using or disclosing an individual’s personal data, unless otherwise required or authorised under written law, or an exception under the PDPA applies (“consent obligation”).
Consent is validly given if the employer has provided the individual with information regarding the purposes for the collection, use or disclosure of the personal data (as the case may be) on or before collecting the personal data (“notification obligation”).
Exceptions to Consent
Section 95 of the Employment Act requires all employers to maintain detailed employment records of employees covered under the Employment Act, which includes the employees’ identity card number or foreign identification number, residential address, date of birth, gender, and other relevant information as specified under the Employment (Employment Records, Key Employment Terms and Pay Slips) Regulations 2016. Thus, to the extent that the collection of personal data is authorised or required under these laws, employers may collect such employee personal data without employees’ consent.
For example, under Section 17 of the PDPA, read with Part 3 of the First Schedule of the PDPA, employers may collect, use and disclose employee personal data without consent where:
For job applicants, deemed consent may also apply when they voluntarily provide their personal data to the organisation during the application process, provided it was reasonable for them to have been asked to provide such data.
Need to Notify Employees of Collection
However, while consent may not be required in certain scenarios, the employer is still required to notify the individual of the purpose of such collection, use or disclosure, and, on request by the individual, the business contact information of a person who is able to answer the individual’s questions relating to such processing.
For new and existing employees, organisations may choose to provide them with notice of such collection, use or disclosure in the employment contract, employee privacy policy, employee data protection handbook, or data protection notices on the company intranet. For job applicants, organisations may include a data protection notice in the job application form.
Other Obligations Under the PDPA
Employers must also comply with several other data protection obligations under the PDPA, as set out below.
Purpose limitation obligation
Employers must only collect, use or disclose employee personal data for purposes that a reasonable person would consider appropriate in the circumstances.
Access and correction obligation
While there is a general requirement for organisations to provide individuals with the right to access and correct their personal data, there are some exceptions to this requirement. For example, employers do not need to provide job applicants with the opinions formed in the course of determining the applicant’s suitability and eligibility as this would be considered opinion data kept solely for evaluative purposes.
Retention limitation obligation
While employers can retain the personal data of former employees and job applicants for future job opportunities, they should not retain such personal data if it no longer serves the purpose for which it was collected and if it is no longer necessary for legal or business purposes. This includes the minimum statutory retention period under the Employment Act.
Accuracy obligation
Employers must make reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy and completeness of employee personal data.
Protection obligation
Employers must protect the employee personal data that they possess or control by making reasonable security arrangements to prevent unauthorised access, collection, use, disclosure, copying, modification, disposal or similar risks, as well as the loss of storage mediums or devices on which personal data is stored.
Transfer limitation obligation
Employers must not transfer employee personal data to a jurisdiction outside Singapore except in accordance with the requirements set out in the PDPA and the Personal Data Protection Regulations 2021, to ensure that transferred personal data is accorded a standard of protection comparable to the PDPA.
Data breach notification obligation
In the event of a data breach involving employee personal data, employers must assess whether a data breach is notifiable and notify the PDPC and/or affected individuals where it is assessed to be notifiable.
Accountability obligation
Employers must appoint a person responsible for ensuring compliance with the PDPA (typically called a data protection officer). Employers must also implement the policies and practices necessary to meet their PDPA obligations, including a process to receive complaints. In addition, employers must communicate information about such policies and practices to their employees and make such information available upon their request.
Foreigners must generally have a valid work pass before they start work in Singapore.
Employing a foreigner without a valid work pass is an offence. Where a foreigner without a work pass is found at any premises, the occupier of the premises is presumed to have employed the foreigner, until the contrary is proved.
Types of Work Passes
There are three main types of work passes.
Employment Pass
The Employment Pass (EP) is for foreign professionals, managers and executives who earn at least SGD5,000 a month in the non-financial services sectors and SGD5,500 a month in the financial services sector and have acceptable qualifications. Older, more experienced candidates will require higher salaries to qualify (the qualifying salaries increase progressively with age, up to SGD10,500 for a candidate in their mid-40s in a non-financial sector and up to SGD11,500 for a candidate in the financial services sector). The minimum qualifying salary will be revised to SGD5,600 in the non-financial services sector and SGD6,200 in the financial services sector for new applications and renewals from 1 January 2025.
Aside from meeting the qualifying salary, candidates will also need to pass a points-based Complementarity Assessment Framework (COMPASS), which has applied to new applications from 1 September 2023 and will apply to renewal applications from 1 September 2024. COMPASS is an additional stage in the EP application process; that is, candidates must pass a two-stage eligibility framework – stage 1 being the above-mentioned EP qualifying salary, and stage 2 being COMPASS. COMPASS evaluates EP applications based on a holistic set of individual and firm-related attributes, and applicants are scored on four foundational criteria (ie, salary, diversity, qualifications and support for local employment). There are also two bonus criteria: a skills bonus (for candidates in jobs where skills shortages exist) and a strategic economic priorities bonus (for partnerships with the Singapore government on ambitious innovation or internationalisation activities).
There are certain exemptions to COMPASS; that is, a candidate will be exempted from COMPASS if they fulfil any of the following conditions:
MOM has released a self-assessment tool for employers to use in order to get an indicative outcome for each EP application, including performance on the EP qualifying salary and COMPASS (with breakdown of scores by criterion).
Generally, employers submitting EP applications must first advertise the job vacancy on the national jobs bank, MyCareersFuture, for at least 14 calendar days and consider all candidates fairly.
S Pass
The S Pass is for foreign mid-level skilled staff who earn at least SGD3,150 a month in the non-financial services sector and SGD3,650 a month in the financial services sector, and they meet the assessment criteria in terms of qualifications and work experience. Older, more experienced candidates will require higher salaries to qualify (the qualifying salaries increase progressively with age, up to SGD4,650 for a candidate in their mid-40s in the non-financial services sector, and up to SGD5,650 for a candidate in the financial services sector). The qualifying salaries mentioned above apply to new applications from 1 September 2023, and to renewals from 1 September 2024. For renewals prior to 1 September 2024, the qualifying salaries of at least SGD3,000 and SGD3,500 apply for the non-financial and financial services sectors respectively.
The minimum qualifying salary will be revised to at least SGD3,300 in the non-financial services sectors and at least SGD3,800 a month in the financial services sector for new applications from 1 September 2025, and for application renewals from 1 September 2026. The qualifying salaries mentioned in this paragraph are not yet the finalised figures, which will be announced closer to the implementation date.
Employers are limited by a quota and subject to a levy for each S Pass-holder employee.
Generally, employers submitting S Pass applications must first advertise the job vacancy on the national jobs bank, MyCareersFuture, for at least 14 calendar days and consider all candidates fairly.
Work Permit
The Work Permit is generally for foreign semi-skilled workers in the construction, manufacturing, marine shipyard, process or services sector. There is no minimum salary for employees on a Work Permit, but employers are limited by a quota and subject to a levy. Depending on the sector, there may also be restrictions based on source country or region, minimum age, maximum period of employment and other restrictions.
Applications for work passes are made to the MOM. When making work pass applications, the prospective employer needs to get the worker’s written consent.
When making an EP application, the prospective employer needs to provide particulars of the foreign worker’s passport, the foreign worker’s educational certificates and the employer’s latest business profile information. Employers are required to verify educational qualifications submitted to the MOM in support of an EP application. The verification can be done through selected background screening companies, which are listed on the MOM’s website. Alternatively, the MOM will also accept verification proof obtained from online portals of countries’ governments or educational institutions, which are also listed on the MOM’s website. The MOM is currently studying the feasibility of other avenues of verification, such as digital certificates.
For Work Permit applications and S Pass applications, the employer is required to buy and maintain medical insurance as follows.
When making a Work Permit application, the employer is required to post a SGD5,000 security bond for each worker (with the exception of Malaysians).
Under the Workplace Safety and Health Act 2006 (WSHA), the “workplace” is defined in Section 5(1) as any premises where a person is at work or is to work, where a person works for the time being, or customarily works, and includes a factory.
With increased recognition of Flexible Work Arrangements (FWAs) (see 1.3 Working Hours), organisations are more open to allowing their employees to do their work away from conventional offices. In a case study published by TAFEP, it was found that FWAs are key to hiring and retaining talent.
As such, workplaces may possibly extend to locations outside the office. This would include mobile working where employees are often required to be on the move to carry out their job.
Work Injury
An employer is liable to pay compensation under the Work Injury Compensation Act 2019 (WICA) where the employee suffers from a work injury arising out of and in the course of their employment. Hence, based on the wording of the WICA, the place where the work injury was suffered does not appear to matter and employees engaged in mobile working would likely be covered under the WICA.
In fact, Section 9 of the WICA provides that employers are even held liable for accidents happening to employees outside of Singapore if the employee is ordinarily resident in Singapore and is employed by an employer in Singapore but is required to work outside Singapore.
Data Privacy
As mentioned in 3.1 Data Privacy Law and Employment, the PDPA contains a transfer obligation. Hence, where employees are posted to an overseas office such as for an overseas assignment and personal data of that employee is transferred to the overseas office, the local office transferring that data must ensure that the overseas office provides a standard of protection to the personal data that is comparable to its protection under the PDPA.
Social Security
CPF contributions are payable if the employee is employed in Singapore but is required to go overseas for an assignment, such as an overseas business trip or training.
A sabbatical leave is an extended period of leave taken for personal reasons such as for further studies, travelling or to rest.
There is no statutory requirement for sabbatical leave in Singapore, and the offering of sabbatical leave is a matter of contractual agreement.
Employers may allow for a sabbatical in the form of non-statutory leave, which is an additional provision to cater to an employee’s welfare. Employers may decide to offer fully paid, part-paid or unpaid sabbatical leave. Typically, sabbatical leave would be provided to employees who have had a long period of service. The duration of the leave would depend on the employer. Typically, an employee would be entitled to a period of two months to a year, continuing their employment upon their return from the sabbatical.
An example is the National Council of Social Services’ (NCSS) Sabbatical Leave Scheme that allows application for up to ten weeks of paid leave for a sabbatical. The NCSS Sabbatical Leave Scheme is available to social workers, therapists (occupational therapists, physiotherapists and speech therapists), psychologists, counsellors and EIPIC (Early Intervention Programme for Infants and Children) teachers.
FWAs
FWAs include working arrangements that differ from traditional arrangements of fixed daily work hours at the workplace. FWAs are usually offered by employers to enable their employees to better manage work as well as family and personal responsibilities. Please also see 1.3 Working Hours.
FWAs may come in the form of flexi-load, flexi-time or flexi-place. A few examples for each category are as follows:
Flexi-load
Flexi-time
Flexi-place
Platform Workers
With the advent of online platforms such as food delivery and ride-hailing apps, there has also been a rise in the number of platform workers using these platforms to provide their services.
However, the government has recognised that platform workers are in a precarious position due to their generally modest incomes and exposure to significant risk due to the amount of time spent on the road. Hence, the Advisory Committee on Platform Workers was established to look into how platform workers could be better protected.
In November 2022, the Advisory Committee on Platform Workers published 12 recommendations that sought to address the lack of protection for platform workers. The following 12 recommendations were accepted by the government.
These 12 recommendations have been incorporated into the Platform Workers Bill, which has been passed by parliament on 10 September 2024.
Trade unions are associations of workers or employers with the regulation of employer-employee relations as their main aim, for the purposes of:
Trade unions are required to apply to the Registrar of Trade Unions to be registered. They are regulated under:
Trade unions play a key role in representing their members in collective bargaining and negotiating with employers for collective agreements (see discussion in 6.3 Collective Bargaining Agreements).
Although uncommon in Singapore, trade unions may take industrial action. They may do so only if they have obtained the consent of the majority of members who would be affected, through a secret ballot.
Trade unions are the representative bodies for employees in Singapore.
Under current legislation, platform workers cannot form unions as they are self-employed. They are currently represented by three industry associations (the National Private Hire Vehicles Association, National Delivery Champions Association, and National Taxi Association), although these associations have limited powers compared to trade unions.
However, based on the recently passed Platform Workers Bill, a new legal framework will be introduced for the representation of platform workers. Platform work associations (PWA) will be required to be registered in order to be formally recognised. Registered PWAs will have similar powers as unions to engage in collective bargaining on behalf of platform workers, to represent platform workers in disputes and to provide platform workers with support services.
Collective agreements are agreements between an employer and the trade union on the employees’ employment terms. They are valid for a minimum of two years and a maximum of three years.
Certain matters are statutorily excluded from the scope of collective bargaining, such as:
A trade union must be accorded recognition by the employer under Section 17(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1960 and the Industrial Relations (Recognition of a Trade Union of Employees) Regulations before it may engage in collective bargaining.
Either the employer or the trade union may initiate the collective bargaining process through serving notice.
If a collective agreement cannot be reached within the prescribed timeframes, any party to the negotiations may make a request to the MOM for conciliation assistance. If no agreement can be reached between the parties through conciliation, the trade dispute can be referred to the Industrial Arbitration Court as a last resort.
An employment contract may be terminated by agreement, including by way of notice (see 7.2 Notice Periods), or by a fundamental breach on the part of the other party, including dismissal for cause (see 7.3 Dismissal For (Serious) Cause).
Advisory on Managing Excess Manpower and Responsible Retrenchment
The TAFEP’s Tripartite Advisory on Managing Excess Manpower and Responsible Retrenchment strongly encourages employers to take a long-term view of their manpower needs, including the need to maintain a strong Singaporean core, and preserve jobs as far as possible.
Retrenchment should be the last resort and, if all other feasible options have been exhausted, should be conducted in a responsible and sensitive manner. This includes providing a longer notice period beyond the contractual or statutory requirements, where possible.
Employers who have businesses registered in Singapore and have at least ten employees must notify the MOM if any employee is notified of their retrenchment, within five working days after such notification.
Notice Period
The Employment Act provides that either party to an employment contract may, at any time, give the other party notice of their intention to terminate the employment. The length of the notice must be the same for both the employer and employee and is determined by the employment contract or, if there is no such provision, the statutory notice period will follow Section 10(3) of the Employment Act and is up to four weeks, depending on the length of service.
The employment may also be terminated by either party without notice by paying a sum to the other party equal to the salary which would have accrued to the employee in lieu of notice.
The Tripartite Guidelines on Wrongful Dismissal provide that where the employment contract provides for termination with notice, the employer is entitled to terminate the employment with notice without providing a reason.
Formalities
The Employment Act requires that notice of termination must be in writing. Even where the Employment Act does not apply, it is usually prudent to give notice in writing.
The notice should generally contain the date of termination, or make it ascertainable by computation. In addition, where an employer is giving notice, it is generally useful to state the employer’s expectations of the employee’s work and conduct up to the last day of work.
Severance Payments
Generally, there is no statutory requirement for an employer to pay retrenchment benefits/severance payments. However, an entitlement to retrenchment payments/severance payments may be provided in the terms of employment contracts.
Employees who fall under Part 4 of the Employment Act will not be entitled to any retrenchment benefit if they have not been in continuous service with their employer for two years or more. Non-Part 4 employees are not statutorily entitled to any retrenchment benefit.
The quantum of severance benefits will often depend on the terms of the employment contract or, where the employee is unionised, the collective agreement.
Where there is no contractual provision for the quantum of severance benefits, the TAFEP’s Tripartite Advisory on Managing Excess Manpower and Responsible Retrenchment recommends that employers pay severance benefits of between two weeks’ to one month’s salary per year of service, depending on the financial position of the company and taking into consideration the industry norm. The TAFEP’s recommendation represents the prevailing norm for the quantum of severance benefits.
An employee may be summarily dismissed for cause, without notice or salary in lieu of notice, if the employee commits a fundamental breach of the employment contract, such as where there is disobedience, negligence, incompetence or disloyalty.
An employee may also be summarily dismissed if the employment contract provides for the immediate termination of the contract on the occurrence of certain events and such an event occurs. For example, an employment contract may provide that an employer may immediately terminate the contract if the employee is convicted of a criminal offence involving fraud or dishonesty.
Procedure Under the Employment Act
Where an employee is covered by the Employment Act, an employee can only be summarily dismissed for misconduct after a due inquiry. The requirement for there to be a due inquiry only applies if the employee is summarily dismissed for misconduct, and not for wilful breach of the employment contract or some other reason (eg, gross incompetence).
A due inquiry requires that the employee concerned be properly informed about the allegation(s) and the evidence against them so that they have an opportunity to defend themselves by presenting their position and any other evidence. Additionally, the person hearing the inquiry should be seen as impartial.
A failure to carry out a due inquiry may constitute wrongful dismissal. See 8.1 Wrongful Dismissal.
Procedure Under Common Law
There is no general common law prescription of procedural due process or requirement for the application of natural justice.
However, where there is an employment contract, or other terms are incorporated into the employment contract that set out the procedure for inquiry into misconduct, the employer will have to comply with such procedure for dismissal on the grounds of misconduct.
It is common for employers and departing employees to enter into termination agreements, which may contain obligations in the remaining period of employment, as well as post-employment obligations. Some of the provisions in such agreements include severance payments, arrangements for employee stock option plans (ESOPs) and other benefits payments, mutual waivers and releases, non-disparagement clauses, and post-termination restrictive covenants. These agreements provide clarity and closure at the end of the employment relationship and minimise the risk of disputes.
Employers need to handle the presentation of termination agreements with care. For example, employers will want to avoid their employees apprehending discussion of such agreements as constructive dismissal from employment or perceiving that they are under duress or other undue pressure to enter into the agreements.
The dismissal of an employee because of discrimination on the basis of that employee’s age, race, gender, religion, marital status and family responsibilities, or disability is regarded as wrongful dismissal. It is also wrongful dismissal to dismiss an employee in order to deprive them of benefits/entitlements that they would otherwise have earned (eg, maternity benefits), or to punish the employee for exercising an employment right (eg, filing a mediation request, or declining a request to work overtime), according to the Tripartite Guidelines on Wrongful Dismissal.
It is also an offence under the Industrial Relations Act 1960 for employers to discriminate against members of trade unions.
Wrongful dismissal is the dismissal of an employee without just or sufficient cause. The termination of employment with notice but without giving any reason is presumed not to be wrongful. However, if an employer chooses to give a reason, the dismissal can be wrongful if the reason given is proven to be false. If no reason is given, an employee must substantiate a wrongful reason for the dismissal, such as discrimination, deprivation of benefit, or to punish an employee for exercising their employment right (Tripartite Guidelines on Wrongful Dismissal).
Damages for Wrongful Dismissal
The normal measure of damages in a case of wrongful dismissal is for the amount which the employee would have received under the employment contract had the employer lawfully terminated the contract by giving the required notice or paying salary in lieu of notice. However, if the wrongful dismissal claim is brought to the Employment Claims Tribunal, the successful employee may be awarded compensation for harm suffered in addition to the employee’s loss of income.
Reinstatement of Employment
For employees covered under the Employment Act, an employee who considers that they have been dismissed without just cause or excuse may lodge a claim with the Employment Claims Tribunal for the reinstatement of their former employment, or compensation.
However, under common law, the reinstatement of former employment is generally not granted and the former employee will typically be compensated by damages.
Tripartite Guidelines on Fair Employment Practices
The Tripartite Guidelines on Fair Employment Practices (TGFEP) are issued by the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP), consisting of the MOM, the Singapore National Employers Federation and the National Trades Union Congress.
The TGFEP is mainly guided by the following five principles of fair employment practices.
Newly Proposed Workplace Fairness Legislation
On 4 August 2023, the government announced that it has accepted the Tripartite Committee’s Final Recommendations For Workplace Fairness Legislation (the “WFL Recommendations”). The WFL Recommendations set out 22 recommendations to tackle workplace discrimination and the MOM has indicated that the government targets to enact the WFL Recommendations into legislation in the second half of 2024. The recommendations are categorised as follows:
While the existing TGFEP does not have the force of law, it is being retained and enhanced to work in concert with upcoming legislation. Thus, employers should continue to comply with the TGFEP even where the Workplace Fairness Legislation does not apply.
Discrimination in Dismissal and Retrenchment
The dismissal or retrenchment of an employee because of discrimination on the basis of that employee’s age, race, gender, religion, marital status and family responsibilities, or disability is wrongful (Tripartite Guidelines on Wrongful Dismissal; Tripartite Advisory on Managing Excess Manpower and Responsible Retrenchment).
Employers who have wrongfully dismissed employees on discriminatory grounds may be made to compensate the employees beyond their salaries payable in lieu of notice. Furthermore, the MOM may also take action against employers found to follow discriminatory practices by curtailing work pass privileges for such employers.
Court Proceedings
Most court proceedings in respect of civil disputes (including employment disputes) are now conducted via videoconferencing. Certain hearings, such as those involving the examination of witnesses, however, continue to be conducted in person. In some cases, parties may seek permission for witnesses who are situated abroad to give evidence via video conference.
Mediation
Mediation conducted by the Tripartite Alliance for Dispute Management (TADM), which is a prerequisite for a party to bring a claim to the Employment Claims Tribunal (see 9.1 Litigation), is mainly conducted online via the TADM online dispute resolution (ODR) system, or by email or phone. The process involves each party exchanging correspondence or responses via email or the ODR system, with the mediator facilitating the exchange and, where necessary, with the mediator having private discussions with the parties separately.
Mediation before a private mediation provider such as the Singapore Mediation Centre may also be conducted virtually, in-person, or in a hybrid manner, depending on the parties’ agreement. Flexibility in the conduct of the mediation can make it easier for parties with representatives that are located in different countries to participate in the mediation.
Employment Claims Tribunal
The Employment Claims Tribunal provides an alternative, low-cost forum for employees and employers to resolve salary-related claims or wrongful dismissal disputes. For a claim to be heard in the Employment Claims Tribunal, the following preconditions must be satisfied:
However, certain employees, namely, seafarers, domestic workers, and public officers are not allowed to bring claims before the Employment Claims Tribunal and employers are similarly not allowed to bring claims against such employees before the Employment Claims Tribunal.
All proceedings before the Employment Claims Tribunal are conducted in private. The parties must act in person and cannot be represented by lawyers.
Litigation
Parties may choose to bring their employment disputes before the Singapore courts. Claims not exceeding SGD60,000 are filed in the magistrate’s court, while claims not exceeding SGD250,000 are filed in the district court. Claims exceeding SGD250,000 are filed in the High Court.
There are no specific processes under Singapore law for bringing class action claims.
Arbitration
Parties can agree to have disputes arising between them determined through arbitration. If an action is brought before a court where the parties have entered into an arbitration agreement, the court will generally stay the court proceedings.
Mediation
The TADM provides mediation services for salary-related claims, wrongful dismissal claims and appeals under the Retirement and Re-employment Act. Only disputes that cannot be resolved via mediation may then be referred to the Employment Claims Tribunal.
Parties can also agree to refer employment disputes to private mediation service providers, such as the Singapore Mediation Centre.
Costs are generally awarded to the successful party at the discretion of the court, taking into account the conduct of all the parties (including before and during the proceedings) and the parties’ conduct in relation to any attempt to resolve the dispute through mediation or any other means of dispute resolution.
10 Collyer Quay
#10-01
Ocean Financial Centre
Singapore 049315
+65 6535 0733
+65 6535 4906
mail@drewnapier.com www.drewnapier.com2024 – Strengthening Singapore’s Workforce and Labour Mobility
The Singapore government has made several changes to the employment legislation and regulatory framework to empower more working-age adults to continue working or return to the workforce, and to improve labour mobility. In this article, we examine three key changes and their consequent impact on employers and employees in Singapore.
Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests
According to the 2023 Labour Force Report by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), nearly a quarter of the 1.12 million residents outside the workforce cited housework and caregiving as reasons for not working. With an ageing population in Singapore, there will likely be an increase in the proportion of workers with caregiving responsibilities.
Flexible work arrangements (FWA) can enable more working adults, including seniors, caregivers, and young parents, to balance work and personal responsibilities, allowing them to continue working or return to the workforce. Employers can use FWAs as a tool for talent attraction and retention. According to a survey conducted by Michael Page in 2023, 41% of local employees would consider changing jobs for better flexibility. By offering FWA, employers gain access to a larger talent pool and retain valuable employees who require the flexibility to continue working.
The tripartite partners of the MOM, the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and the Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF) have introduced the Tripartite Guidelines on Flexible Work Arrangement Requests (the “FWA Guidelines”), which come into force on 1 December 2024. The FWA Guidelines establish (i) how formal FWA requests should be made; (ii) how employers should consider such requests in a proper manner; and (iii) the requirement to communicate decisions on such requests in a transparent and timely manner.
Requirements for a formal FWA request
Under the FWA Guidelines, a formal FWA request must be made in writing, and include minimally the following information (the “Requirements”).
If an employer does not have any existing policy or procedure for employees to request FWA, employees can submit a formal FWA request by complying with the Requirements. The FWA Guidelines note that a text message may qualify as a formal FWA request if all the Requirements are met. However, if an employer has an existing policy or procedure for employees to request FWA, employees should adhere to the existing policy or procedure. This may include additional stipulations beyond the Requirements, such as using a certain template, submitting via a portal, or including further information. Employers are encouraged to continue any existing practices if they work well for both employers and employees.
Employer’s consideration of an FWA request
When considering a formal FWA request, employers should:
Employers should notify their employees of their decision on the FWA request within two months after the request was submitted. The two-month window gives employers enough time to consider what alternative arrangements are needed should the request be approved, and evaluate whether these arrangements are feasible.
If the request is rejected, the employer should include the reason(s) for rejection, and are encouraged to discuss viable alternatives with the employee. Employers and employees are encouraged to address any disagreements through the company’s internal grievance handling procedure as far as possible. Unionised employees may also seek assistance and advice from their unions.
Where employers do not adhere to the FWA Guidelines, employees can seek assistance from the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) or their respective trade unions. MOM and TAFEP will refer to the FWA Guidelines in supporting the adoption of, and handling cases related to, FWAs. In response to media queries, MOM has stated that where employers are recalcitrant or wilfully non-compliant, MOM “may issue a warning and require them to attend corrective workshops”.
Practical guidance for employers
Employers would do well to develop their own FWA policies, processes and frameworks before the FWA Guidelines come into force on 1 December 2024. This will allow employers to fine-tune their policies, processes and documentation before the implementation date where it can be expected that employers will start receiving FWA requests from their employees.
An FWA policy should cover the following.
The FWA Guidelines aim to normalise FWAs in the workplace by putting in place formalised and clear processes for employees to request them. Similar to legislation in countries such as Australia and New Zealand, the FWA Guidelines do not guide the outcome of FWA requests – employers retain the prerogative to decide on work arrangements, but are now obliged to properly consider the requests and base acceptance or rejection on reasonable business grounds.
Raising of Retirement and Re-employment Age
With increased life expectancy and health, more Singapore residents are consequentially entering the older age bands, leading to a corresponding increase in the proportion of older workers in the resident labour force. It has been reported that Singapore presently has the third-highest employment rate for workers aged 65 to 69 among countries in the OECD, and is expected to have one in four citizens aged 65 and above by 2030.
In order to support older Singaporeans who wish to continue working to do so and better prepare them for retirement, on 19 August 2019, the MOM announced that the retirement and re-employment ages would be raised to 65 years and 70 years respectively by 2030.
As part of the progressive increase in the retirement and re-employment ages, on 1 July 2022, the retirement and re-employment ages were raised to 63 years and 68 years respectively. On 4 March 2024, the Minister of State for Manpower announced that from 1 July 2026, the retirement and re-employment age will be raised to 64 years and 69 years respectively.
Sectors that employ more part-time and older workers are likely to be more significantly impacted by the change in the retirement and re-employment ages. According to the Minister of Manpower in response to a Parliamentary question on 7 February 2023, the top five industries employing the most resident workers aged 65 and over in 2022 were “wholesale and retail trade, administrative and support services, transportation and storage, accommodation and food services, and manufacturing”. In addition, the Minister highlighted that “[a] third of the 207,000 employed residents aged 65 and over were working part-time”. Employers in these sectors should take note of the following in adapting to the increase in the retirement and re-employment ages.
Practical guidance for employers
The increase in the proportion of older employees in the workforce (who are also employed for longer) will inevitably give rise to consequential issues and tensions arising from a more inter-generational workforce. Coupled with rapid technological changes, the difference in backgrounds, mindsets and skill sets across different generations will become sharper. Generational gaps in values and work ethics may lead younger employees to feel that older workers are not agile enough to meet changing demands, while mature workers may feel uncomfortable reporting under a younger authority. Moreover, stereotypes may exist such that older workers tend to be considered less physically fit, harder to train, or less willing to adapt to new roles, and it can be difficult to retain them if the workplace culture is not welcoming of age diversity. Progressive employers must learn how to cope with these workforce dynamics so as to effectively tap into the growing pool of senior workers to meet their manpower needs in the long run.
In addition, employers should study and understand their workforce profile and plan their manpower needs in anticipation of more employees becoming more senior. They should consider setting up age-friendly workplaces to better tap into the growing pool of senior workers, such as by implementing technological solutions to minimise physical work for senior workers. In addition, employers should also adapt by putting in place progressive hiring practices that centre on skill sets rather than age, and by reviewing their hiring and HR policies to provide for flexible work arrangements and re-employment opportunities. In this regard, employers may take advantage of the Part-Time Re-employment Grant introduced by the Singapore government to support more flexible work options for senior workers. Employers can also receive support through the Senior Employment Credit scheme, which provides wage offsets to employers who hire Singaporean workers aged 60 and above.
Changes to Paternity Leave and Unpaid Infant Care Leave Benefits
Singapore is amongst the countries with the lowest birth rates globally and in 2023, Singapore’s resident total fertility rate dropped to 0.97, marking the first time in Singapore’s history that the total fertility rate has dropped below 1.
According to feedback received by the Singapore government, the cost of raising a child, especially when children are younger, up to six years old, and the ability to manage work and family commitments are some concerns that have been raised by Singaporeans. To this end, the Singapore government has implemented the following measures which recently came into force.
From 1 January 2024, working fathers of Singaporean children can take up to four weeks of government-paid paternity leave, up from the previous two weeks offered, depending on their employers. The additional two weeks of paternity leave is currently given by employers on a voluntary basis, but is expected to become mandatory in due course.
In addition, from 1 January 2024, working parents with Singaporean children aged below two years old are eligible to take up to 12 days of unpaid infant care leave per year, which is an increase from the previous six days of unpaid infant care leave.
These measures were put in place to encourage paternal involvement in raising children and to give parents more time to bond and with and care for their young children. Taken together with the FWA Guidelines, it is hoped that these measures will help to alleviate the concerns raised by Singaporeans regarding parenthood.
Practical guidance for employers
Given that the increased paternity leave to four weeks is expected to become mandatory in the future, employers should begin putting in place working arrangements and policies to facilitate the increase in paternity leave. This includes updating internal policies and systems as well as educating and training managers on how to handle requests for increased paternity leave and unpaid infant care leave and how to manage manpower needs in light of such requests.
This is especially pertinent in male-dominated sectors and smaller companies, which will need to consider how operational and manpower needs can continue to be met whilst employees are on leave, for example by looking at how the coverage of employees’ job responsibilities can be distributed such that there will be no disruption to the workflow.
Upcoming Tripartite Guidelines on the Inclusion of Non-competes in Employment Contracts
In February 2024, the Minister for Manpower announced that the MOM and its tripartite partners are developing a set of tripartite guidelines on the inclusion of restrictive clauses, such as non-competes, in employment contracts. The Minister stated that the guidelines are meant “to shape norms and provide employers with further guidance” and are targeted for release in the second half of 2024. In a clear warning to employers, the Minister warned that “MOM will not, will never, and does not condone any exploitative employment contracts”.
The proposed introduction of the tripartite guidelines presents an opportune moment to reflect on Singapore’s present approach towards non-compete clauses.
Singapore law position on non-compete clauses
Singapore law strikes a balance by holding a non-compete clause to be void unless the employer can show that the clause protects a legitimate interest of the employer and is both reasonable in the interests of the parties and the public.
Legitimate proprietary interests may include (i) trade secrets or confidential information, (ii) trade connections established with the employer’s customers or its suppliers, and (iii) the maintenance of a stable, trained workforce. Where there are other express provisions in the employment contract protecting one of these interests, for example, via a confidentiality agreement or a non-solicitation clause, the employer must be able to show that the non-compete clause protects additional legitimate interests beyond what is already protected in order for the clause to be upheld.
As to reasonableness, the Singapore courts will consider whether the clause is drafted no wider than is necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate proprietary interests. Factors such as scope of the activity, along with the geographical area and the duration of the restraint would be relevant. In relation to the interests of the public, a High Court case has found that an indiscriminate application of identical restrictive covenants across the employment contracts of all employees regardless of their seniority, nature of work or level of access to information, would be deemed unreasonable.
A recent decision by the High Court in relation to a suit commenced by e-commerce giant Shopee against its ex-employee helps illustrate some of the above principles in action. Shopee sought injunctions to restrain its ex-employee from, amongst others, accepting employment with ByteDance as a Leader for Governance and Experience of TikTok Shop. Pertinently, the ex-employee’s last role in Shopee was as Head of Operations for Shopee Brazil, which was confined to Brazil, in which TikTok Shop did not operate.
Shopee relied upon a non-compete clause, which prohibited the ex-employee from accepting employment with Shopee’s competitor in any country where Shopee had operations. One of Shopee’s main arguments was that the clause served to protect Shopee’s confidential information, which the ex-employee was allegedly privy to by virtue of his participation in regional operations meetings, where Shopee’s strategies for all markets would be discussed.
The High Court held that the non-compete clause was unenforceable. One key reason was that Shopee’s confidential information, which was allegedly the legitimate interest being protected by the non-compete clause, was already protected by an employee confidentiality agreement.
In relation to the reasonableness of the clause, the High Court observed that the confidential information in question must be specifically pleaded, and expressed serious doubts about the reasonableness of the scope of Shopee’s clause. This was because Shopee failed to plead any specific confidential information in respect of all markets where Shopee was operating, even though the ex-employee had only worked in Brazil under Shopee Brazil.
In another case, the High Court upheld a non-compete clause which prohibited an engineer of a marine manufacturing company from carrying on any activity in competition with the company’s business for two years within Singapore and Malaysia. The court held that the company had a legitimate proprietary interest in maintaining a pool of trained skilled workers; and that the clause was reasonable as it only specifically prevented the joining of businesses in competition with the design and manufacturing of marine hydraulic and electrical installations. The court also noted that the restraint was limited to only countries in which the company had business presence, and the duration of the restraint was also reasonable given the specialised nature of the industry.
Practical guidance for employers
Given the Singapore government’s clear policy direction in protecting workers through fair employment practices, employers can expect that non-compete clauses will be closely scrutinised by the MOM as well as the Singapore courts. Employers will bear the burden of showing that the restraint seeks to protect a legitimate proprietary interest over and above those that are already protected by any confidentiality and/or non-solicitation clauses. The clauses would also need to be as specific and targeted as possible in their restrictions to enhance their reasonableness and resulting enforceability. The use of expansive boilerplate “one-size-fits-all” non-compete clauses that purport to apply across all employee job functions and seniority levels will certainly not be enforceable.
Apart from investing time and resources to properly draft highly customised non-compete clauses to increase the prospect of their enforceability, employers can also rely on non-solicitation agreements, confidentiality agreements, as well as paid non-compete and/or garden-leave provisions/arrangements. The latter mechanisms can be triggered by an employer against a departing employee to require the employee not to work for a competitor for a stipulated period of time, in return for receiving a pre-agreed quantum of money.
Employers can also consider placing a reasonable price on training investments they make in employees and require repayments if they leave before the employer has recovered the training or opportunity investment.
Ultimately, employers need to understand that legal protections cannot be the only line of defence against employees leaving to join competitors. Employers need to ensure that their working environment, compensation and benefits policies and career progression tracks are attractive and competitive.
What to expect from the upcoming guidelines
We do not expect the tripartite guidelines to change the state of the law, which is well-established by the Singapore courts. However, to provide more guidance to employers, it is hoped that the tripartite guidelines will propose the recommended range of monetary compensation to be paid to the employee during the restraint period, suggest the recommended profile of employees that such clauses should be targeted at, and propose scenarios where such non-competes should not be enforced, for example, when an employee is being retrenched.
We expect that the guidelines will seek to create a balanced ecosystem by supporting employers in developing fair and reasonable non-compete clauses that protect legitimate business interests, whilst respecting employees’ rights to pursue their professional aspirations and maintain labour mobility.
9 Straits View #06-07
Marina One West Tower
Singapore 018937
+65 6536 3600
info@rajahtannasia.com sg.rajahtannasia.com